4.1 letter of submittal and 4.2 attachments i-495 …...attachment 4.0.1.1 braddock road (route 620)...

132
4.1 LETTER OF SUBMITTAL AND 4.2 ATTACHMENTS State Project No.: (FO) 0495-029-123, P101, C501 Federal Project No.: STP-495-5(094) Contract ID No.: C00105130DB72 March 14, 2014 From: South of Old Dominion Overpass To: George Washington Memorial Parkway I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE FAIRFAX COUNTY, VA A Design-Build Project BEGIN PROJECT END PROJECT Live Oak Overpass Georgetown Pike Ramps Old Dominion Overpass GWMP Trumpet

Upload: others

Post on 20-Apr-2020

10 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS

State Project no.: (fo) 0495-029-123, P101, c501federal Project no.: StP-495-5(094)contract id no.: c00105130db72

march 14, 2014

From: South of old dominion overpass To: George Washington memorial Parkway

I-495 NortherNSectIoN Shoulder uSeFaIrFax couNty, Va a design-build Project

BEGIN PROJECT

END PROJECT

Live Oak Overpass

Georgetown Pike Ramps

Old Dominion Overpass

GWMP Trumpet

Page 2: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1

Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609)

Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County, Virginia

LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

1 of 2

Offerors shall furnish a copy of this Letter of Submittal Checklist, with the page references added, with the Letter of Submittal.

Letter of Submittal Component Form (if any) RFP Part 1

Cross Reference Page

Reference

Letter of Submittal Checklist and Contents Attachment 4.0.1.1 Section 4.0.1.1

Acknowledgement of RFP, Revisions, and/or Addenda Attachment 3.4

(Form C-78-RFP) Sections 3.4; 4.0.1.1

Letter of Submittal NA Sections 4.1

Letter of Submittal on Offeror’s letterhead NA Section 4.1.1

Offeror’s full legal name and address NA Section 4.1.1

Authorized representative’s original signature NA Section 4.1.1

Declaration of intent NA Section 4.1.2

120 day declaration NA Section 4.1.3

Point of Contact information NA Section 4.1.4

Principal Officer information NA Section 4.1.5

Offeror’s Corporate Structure NA Section 4.1.6

Full Legal Name of Lead Contractor and Lead Designer NA Section 4.1.7

Offeror’s VDOT prequalification information NA Section 4.1.8

DBE statement confirming Offeror is committed to achieving the required DBE goal NA Section 4.1.9

Final Completion Date NA Section 4.1.10

friedman
Typewritten Text
NA
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
1 of 2
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
1 of 2
friedman
Typewritten Text
2 of 2
friedman
Typewritten Text
2 of 2
friedman
Typewritten Text
2 of 2
friedman
Typewritten Text
2 of 2
friedman
Typewritten Text
2 of 2
friedman
Typewritten Text
2 of 2
friedman
Typewritten Text
2 of 2
friedman
Typewritten Text
1 of 2
friedman
Typewritten Text
1 of 2
friedman
Typewritten Text
1 of 2
friedman
Typewritten Text
1 of 2
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
NA
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
Page 3: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1

Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609)

Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County, Virginia

LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST AND CONTENTS

2 of 2

Letter of Submittal Component Form (if any) RFP Part 1

Cross Reference Page

Reference

Attachments to the Letter of Submittal NA Section 4.2

Affiliated and/ or Subsidiary Companies Attachment 4.2.1 Section 4.2.1

Certification Regarding Debarment Forms Attachment 4.2.2(a)

Attachment 4.2.2(b) Section 4.2.2

Offeror’s VDOT prequalification information NA Section 4.2.3

Evidence of obtaining bonding NA Section 4.2.4

Full size copies of DPOR licenses and SCC registrations NA Section 4.2.5

SCC registration information - businesses Attachment 4.2.5 Section 4.2.5.1

DPOR registration information - businesses Attachment 4.2.5 Section 4.2.5.2

Lead Contractor Work History Form Attachment 4.2.6(a) Section 4.2.6

Lead Designer Work History Form Attachment 4.2.6(b) Section 4.2.6

Conceptual Roadway Plans NA Section 4.2.7

friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
Section 4.2.8
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
NA
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
Written Statement Fully Compliant with RFP
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
NA
friedman
Typewritten Text
Tab 4.2.1
friedman
Typewritten Text
Tab 4.2.2
friedman
Typewritten Text
Tab 4.2.3
friedman
Typewritten Text
Tab 4.2.4
friedman
Typewritten Text
Tab 4.2.5
friedman
Typewritten Text
Tab 4.2.6
friedman
Typewritten Text
Tab 4.2.7
friedman
Typewritten Text
Tab 4.2.8
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
Tab 4.2.6
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
Tab 4.2.5
friedman
Typewritten Text
Tab 4.2.5
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
Page 4: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 5: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

FRANCIS O. DAY CO., INC. CONTRACTOR

850 East Gude Drive, Suite A, Rockville, Maryland 20850 Phone 301-652-2400 Fax 301-424-3697

March 14, 2014 Mr. Bryan W. Stevenson, P.E. Alternate Project Delivery Office Virginia Department of Transportation 1401 East Broad Street Richmond, VA 23219 RE: Letter of Submittal (4.1) and Attachments (4.2)

I-495 Northern Shoulder Use Fairfax County, Virginia / A Design-Build Project Project No. (FO) 0495-029-123, P101, C501 / Contract ID #C00105130DB72

Dear Mr. Stevenson: We are pleased to submit for your consideration one (1) original of our Letter of Submittal and Attachments to the Letter of Submittal, which bears original signatures, and one (1) CD-ROM containing the entire Letter of Submittal and Attachments in a single cohesive Adobe PDF file for this Design-Build (D-B) project in Fairfax County. In preparing this proposal, Francis O. Day Co., Inc. (F.O. Day) has carefully reviewed the Request for Proposal dated 2/6/2014; attended the Pre-Bid Conference on 2/14/2014; reviewed the RFP Q&A’s dated 2/27/2014 and 3/11/2014; Addendum No. 1 dated 3/06/2014; and visited the project site. F.O. Day will be the Lead Contractor and is the Offeror who has the overall authority on this project. F.O. Day is family-owned for over 60 years and has developed into an award-winning construction company (Site Development – Heavy/Highway – Asphalt) by building close relationships with our extended family of valued clients, trusted employees, and dedicated subcontractors and suppliers. F.O. Day has selected Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc. (JMT) as our lead designer to provide all engineering services for this project. JMT is a multi-disciplined architectural/ engineering employee owned company that offers a full array of consulting and technology services for infrastructure projects throughout the United States. Both F.O. Day and JMT have been involved with innovative project delivery methods including design-build for more than 15+ years. In accordance with Section 4.1 of the Instructions for Offerors we are submitting the following Letter of Submittal requirements for your review: 4.1.1 Authorized Representative Original Signature - This submittal is signed in ink

by an authorized representative of Francis O. Day Company, Inc. 4.1.2 Declare of Intent - It is Francis O. Day Company, Inc.’s intent to enter into a

contract with VDOT for the project in accordance with the terms of the RFP. 4.1.3 120 Day Declaration - Pursuant to Part 1, Section 8.2, Francis O. Day Company,

Inc.’s offer will remain in full force for one hundred twenty (120) days after the date the proposal is submitted to VDOT (“Letter of Submittal & Price Proposal Due Date”).

Page 6: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 7: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Affiliated and/Subsidiary Companies

Attachment 4.2.1

4.2.1 Affiliated and/Subsidiary Com

panies

Page 8: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

ATTACHMENT 4.2.1

State Project No. (FO) 0495-029-123, P101, C501

Affilia ted and Subs id iary Companies of the Offeror

1 of 1

Offerors shall complete the table and include the addresses of affiliates or subsidiary companies as applicable. By completing this table, Offerors certify that all affiliated and subsidiary companies of the Offeror are listed.

The Offeror does not have any affiliated or subsidiary companies. Affiliated and/ or subsidiary companies of the Offeror are listed below.

Relationship with Offeror (Affiliate or Subsidiary)

Full Legal Name Address

friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
X
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
Subsidiary FO Day Bituminous Co., LLC 850 East Gude Dr., Suite A Rockville, MD 20850
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
Same
friedman
Typewritten Text
Same
friedman
Typewritten Text
Same
friedman
Typewritten Text
Same
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
Subsidiary
friedman
Typewritten Text
Subsidiary
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
Subsidiary
friedman
Typewritten Text
Subsidiary
friedman
Typewritten Text
Forestville Asphalt Co., LLC
friedman
Typewritten Text
Frederick Asphalt Co, LLC
friedman
Typewritten Text
Charles County Asphalt Co., LLC
friedman
Typewritten Text
Loudoun County Asphalt Co., LLC
friedman
Typewritten Text
Day Development Co., LLC
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
Affiliate
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
Same
friedman
Typewritten Text
Page 9: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Certification Regarding Debarment Forms

Attachment 4.2.2

4.2.2 Certification Regarding Debarm

ent Forms

Page 10: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 11: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 12: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 13: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 14: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 15: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 16: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Offeror’s VDOT Prequalification Information

Attachment 4.2.3 4.2.3 Offeror’s VDOT Prequalification Inform

ation

Page 17: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

TRNSPORT - E22 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 02/21/2014 LSPPREQ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2:11 PM PREQUALIFIED VENDORS SORTED BY VENDOR NAME PAGE 130 THIS LIST INCLUDES ALL PREQUALIFIED LEVELS AS OF 02/21/2014 - D - =============================================================================== D1026 DAY AND SONS, INC. PREQ. EXP : 04/30/2014 --PREQ ADDRESS ------------------ WORK CLASSES (LISTED BUT NOT LIMITED TO) 517 PUMPHREY LANE 024 - JACKING AND BORING OF PIPE GLEN BURNIE, MD 21061-0000 045 - UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PHONE : 410-762-5582 101 - EXCAVATING FAX : 410-762-5584 BUSINESS CONTACT: DAY, KEVIN LAWRENCE EMAIL: [email protected] ------DBE INFORMATION------ DBE TYPE : DBE DBE CONTACT: N/A =============================================================================== D499 FRANCIS O. DAY CO., INC. PREQ. EXP : 04/30/2014 --PREQ ADDRESS ------------------ WORK CLASSES (LISTED BUT NOT LIMITED TO) 850 EAST GUDE DRIVE, STE. A 002 - GRADING ROCKVILLE, MD 20850-1387 003 - MAJOR STRUCTURES PHONE : 301-652-2400 004 - ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING FAX : 301-424-4443 007 - MINOR STRUCTURES 045 - UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BUSINESS CONTACT: FEMIANO, DANIEL JOSEPH EMAIL: [email protected] ------DBE INFORMATION------ DBE TYPE : N/A DBE CONTACT: N/A ===============================================================================

friedman
Highlight
Page 18: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Evidence of Obtaining Bonding Attachment 4.2.4

4.2.4 Evidence of Obtaining Bonding

Page 19: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 20: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

SCC Registrations and DPOR Licenses

Attachment 4.2.5

4.2.5 SCC Registrations and DPOR Licenses

Page 21: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

ATTACHMENT 4.2.5

State Project No. (FO)0495-029-123, P101, C501

SCC and DPOR Information

1 of 1

Offerors shall complete the table and include the required state registration and licensure information. By completing this table, Offerors certify that their team complies with the requirements set forth in Section 4.2.5 and that all businesses listed are active and in good standing.

SCC & DPOR INFORMATION FOR BUSINESSES (RFP Sections 4.2.5.1 and 4.2.5.2)

Business Name

SCC Information (4.2.5.1) DPOR Information (4.2.5.2)

SCC Number

SCC Type of Corporation

SCC Status

DPOR Registered Address

DPOR Registration

Type

DPOR Registration Number

DPOR Expiration Date

Francis O. Day Co., Inc. F048224-2 Corporation Active 850 East Gude Drive Suite A Rockville, MD 20850

Class A Contractor 2705051002 06-30-2015

Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc.

F149901-3 Corporation Active

72 Loveton Circle Sparks, MD 21152

ENG, LA, ARC, LA 0407001314 12-31-2015

13921 Park Center Rd. Suite 140 Herndon, VA 20171

ENG, LS 0411000441 02-29-2016

9201 Arboretum Pkwy. Suite 310 Richmond, VA 23236

ENG, LS 0411000029 02-29-2016

272 Bendix Rd., St. 260 Virginia Beach, VA 23452

ENG, LS 0411000440 02-29-2016

Quinn Consulting Services, Inc.

0492551-7 Corporation Active 14160 Newbrook Dr. Suite 229 Chantilly, VA 20151

ENG 0407003733 12-31-2015

DMY Engineering Consultants, Inc.

0768895-5 Corporation Active 45662 Terminal Drive Suite 110 Dulles, VA 20166

ENG 0407005631 12-31-2015

EEE Consulting, Inc. 0504941-6 Corporation Active 8525 Bell Creek Road Mechanicsville, VA 23116

ENG 0407003798 12-31-2015

Athavale, Lystad & Associates, Inc.

F060584-2 Corporation Active 8180 Greensboro Dr. Suite 550 McLean, VA 22102

ENG 0407002804 12-31-2015

Page 22: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Attachment 4.2.5 SCC Registrations

Page 23: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

SCCon

(Screen Id:/Corp_Data_Inquiry)

02/27/14

CISM0180 CORPORATE DATA INQUIRY 14:43:16

CORP ID: F048224 - 2 STATUS: 00 ACTIVE STATUS DATE: 05/22/85

CORP NAME: DAY CO., INC., FRANCIS O.

DATE OF CERTIFICATE: 05/23/1985 PERIOD OF DURATION: INDUSTRY CODE: 00

STATE OF INCORPORATION: MD MARYLAND STOCK INDICATOR: S STOCK

MERGER IND: S SURVIVOR CONVERSION/DOMESTICATION IND:

GOOD STANDING IND: Y MONITOR INDICATOR:

CHARTER FEE: MON NO: MON STATUS: MONITOR DTE:

R/A NAME: TRAC - THE REGISTERED AGENT COMPANY

STREET: 201 N. UNION STREET AR RTN MAIL:

SUITE 230

CITY: ALEXANDRIA STATE : VA ZIP: 22314

R/A STATUS: 5 B.E. AUTH IN VI EFF. DATE: 01/08/14 LOC 200

ACCEPTED AR#: 213 07 7551 DATE: 04/30/13 ALEXANDRIA CITY

CURRENT AR#: 213 07 7551 DATE: 04/30/13 STATUS: A ASSESSMENT INDICATOR: 0

YEAR FEES PENALTY INTEREST TAXES BALANCE TOTAL SHARES

13 100.00 1,500

:

Page 1 of 1

2/27/2014https://cisiweb.scc.virginia.gov/instant.aspx

Page 24: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

SCCon

(Screen Id:/Corp_Data_Inquiry)

02/24/14

CISM0180 CORPORATE DATA INQUIRY 09:58:04

CORP ID: F149901 - 3 STATUS: 00 ACTIVE STATUS DATE: 10/17/06

CORP NAME: Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc.

DATE OF CERTIFICATE: 10/17/2006 PERIOD OF DURATION: INDUSTRY CODE: 70

STATE OF INCORPORATION: MD MARYLAND STOCK INDICATOR: S STOCK

MERGER IND: CONVERSION/DOMESTICATION IND:

GOOD STANDING IND: Y MONITOR INDICATOR:

CHARTER FEE: 50.00 MON NO: MON STATUS: MONITOR DTE:

R/A NAME: ROBERT GALLAGHER

STREET: 9201 ARBORETUM PKY STE 140 AR RTN MAIL:

CITY: RICHMOND STATE : VA ZIP: 23236

R/A STATUS: 2 OFFICER EFF. DATE: 09/06/07 LOC 120

ACCEPTED AR#: 213 56 5183 DATE: 02/20/14 CHESTERFIELD CO

CURRENT AR#: 213 56 5183 DATE: 02/20/14 STATUS: A ASSESSMENT INDICATOR: 0

YEAR FEES PENALTY INTEREST TAXES BALANCE TOTAL SHARES

13 100.00 1,000

:

Page 1 of 1

2/24/2014https://cisiweb.scc.virginia.gov/instant.aspx

Page 25: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

SCCon

(Screen Id:/Corp_Data_Inquiry)

03/12/14

CISM0180 CORPORATE DATA INQUIRY 17:07:22

CORP ID: 0492551 - 7 STATUS: 00 ACTIVE STATUS DATE: 12/01/08

CORP NAME: QUINN CONSULTING SERVICES INCORPORATED

DATE OF CERTIFICATE: 10/24/1997 PERIOD OF DURATION: INDUSTRY CODE: 00

STATE OF INCORPORATION: VA VIRGINIA STOCK INDICATOR: S STOCK

MERGER IND: S SURVIVOR CONVERSION/DOMESTICATION IND:

GOOD STANDING IND: Y MONITOR INDICATOR:

CHARTER FEE: 50.00 MON NO: MON STATUS: MONITOR DTE:

R/A NAME: JOHN H QUINN JR

STREET: 2208 S KNOLL ST AR RTN MAIL:

CITY: ARLINGTON STATE : VA ZIP: 22202 2134

R/A STATUS: 4 ATTORNEY EFF. DATE: 10/24/97 LOC 106

ACCEPTED AR#: 213 12 8953 DATE: 08/21/13 ARLINGTON COUNT

CURRENT AR#: 213 12 8953 DATE: 08/21/13 STATUS: A ASSESSMENT INDICATOR: 0

YEAR FEES PENALTY INTEREST TAXES BALANCE TOTAL SHARES

13 100.00 5,000

:

Page 1 of 1

3/12/2014https://cisiweb.scc.virginia.gov/instant.aspx

Page 26: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

SCCon

(Screen Id:/Corp_Data_Inquiry)

02/26/14

CISM0180 CORPORATE DATA INQUIRY 21:06:08

CORP ID: 0768895 - 5 STATUS: 00 ACTIVE STATUS DATE: 09/06/13

CORP NAME: DMY ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INC.

DATE OF CERTIFICATE: 09/06/2013 PERIOD OF DURATION: INDUSTRY CODE: 00

STATE OF INCORPORATION: VA VIRGINIA STOCK INDICATOR: S STOCK

MERGER IND: CONVERSION/DOMESTICATION IND: Y

GOOD STANDING IND: Y MONITOR INDICATOR:

CHARTER FEE: 50.00 MON NO: MON STATUS: MONITOR DTE:

R/A NAME: WEIYI MA

STREET: 45662 TERMINAL DRIVE AR RTN MAIL:

SUITE 110

CITY: DULLES STATE : VA ZIP: 20166

R/A STATUS: 1 DIRECTOR EFF. DATE: 09/06/13 LOC 153

ACCEPTED AR#: 000 00 0000 DATE: LOUDOUN COUNTY

CURRENT AR#: 000 00 0000 DATE: STATUS: ASSESSMENT INDICATOR: 0

YEAR FEES PENALTY INTEREST TAXES BALANCE TOTAL SHARES

00 10,000

:

Page 1 of 1

2/26/2014https://cisiweb.scc.virginia.gov/instant.aspx

Page 27: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

SCCon

(Screen Id:/Corp_Data_Inquiry)

02/26/14

CISM0180 CORPORATE DATA INQUIRY 21:05:23

CORP ID: 0504941 - 6 STATUS: 00 ACTIVE STATUS DATE: 08/04/04

CORP NAME: EEE CONSULTING, INC.

DATE OF CERTIFICATE: 06/23/1998 PERIOD OF DURATION: INDUSTRY CODE: 00

STATE OF INCORPORATION: VA VIRGINIA STOCK INDICATOR: S STOCK

MERGER IND: CONVERSION/DOMESTICATION IND:

GOOD STANDING IND: Y MONITOR INDICATOR:

CHARTER FEE: 700.00 MON NO: MON STATUS: MONITOR DTE:

R/A NAME: CT CORPORATION SYSTEM

STREET: 4701 COX ROAD, SUITE 285 AR RTN MAIL:

CITY: GLEN ALLEN STATE : VA ZIP: 23060

R/A STATUS: 5 B.E. AUTH IN VI EFF. DATE: 10/04/13 LOC 143

ACCEPTED AR#: 213 52 4464 DATE: 05/24/13 HENRICO COUNTY

CURRENT AR#: 213 52 4464 DATE: 05/24/13 STATUS: A ASSESSMENT INDICATOR: 0

YEAR FEES PENALTY INTEREST TAXES BALANCE TOTAL SHARES

13 100.00 333,000

:

Page 1 of 1

2/26/2014https://cisiweb.scc.virginia.gov/instant.aspx

Page 28: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

SCCon

(Screen Id:/Corp_Data_Inquiry)

02/26/14

CISM0180 CORPORATE DATA INQUIRY 21:03:14

CORP ID: F060584 - 2 STATUS: 00 ACTIVE STATUS DATE: 03/02/89

CORP NAME: ATHAVALE, LYSTAD & ASSOCIATES, INC.

DATE OF CERTIFICATE: 03/02/1989 PERIOD OF DURATION: INDUSTRY CODE: 00

STATE OF INCORPORATION: MD MARYLAND STOCK INDICATOR: S STOCK

MERGER IND: CONVERSION/DOMESTICATION IND:

GOOD STANDING IND: Y MONITOR INDICATOR:

CHARTER FEE: MON NO: MON STATUS: MONITOR DTE:

R/A NAME: REES BROOME, PC

STREET: 1900 GALLOWS RD STE 700 AR RTN MAIL:

CITY: TYSONS CORNER STATE : VA ZIP: 22182

R/A STATUS: 5 B.E. AUTH IN VI EFF. DATE: 09/01/12 LOC 129

ACCEPTED AR#: 214 03 4212 DATE: 02/06/14 FAIRFAX COUNTY

CURRENT AR#: 214 03 4212 DATE: 02/06/14 STATUS: A ASSESSMENT INDICATOR: 0

YEAR FEES PENALTY INTEREST TAXES BALANCE TOTAL SHARES

14 100.00 1,000

:

Page 1 of 1

2/26/2014https://cisiweb.scc.virginia.gov/instant.aspx

Page 29: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Attachment 4.2.5 DPOR Licenses

Page 30: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 31: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 32: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 33: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 34: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 35: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 36: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 37: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 38: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 39: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Lead Contractor and Designer Work History Forms

Attachment 4.2.6

4.2.6 Lead Contractor and Designer W

ork History Forms

Page 40: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Attachment 4.2.6(a) Lead Contractor Work History Forms

Page 41: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(a)

LEAD CONTRACTOR - WORK HISTORY FORM

(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)

a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime design consulting firm responsible for the overall project design.

c. Contact information of the Client or Owner and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.

d. Contract Completion Date (Original)

e. Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)

f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Dollar Value of Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement.(in thousands)

Original Contract Value

Final or Estimated Contract Value

Name: I-270 West Spur at Democracy Boulevard and Westlake Terrace Location: Montgomery County, MD

Name: The Wilson T. Ballard Company

Name of Client/Owner: Maryland State Highway Admin. District 3 Phone: 301.513.7300 Project Manager: Darrell Mobley (currently Director of Prince George’s County DPW&T) Phone: 301.883.5600 Email: [email protected]

September 2003 (Original)

November 2004 (Actual)

MSHA issued Extra Work Order for

additional 414 days

$17,023 Contract Value

(Original)

$18,096 Contract Value

(Final)

$9, 469 Construction

Fee

h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement. If the Offeror chooses to submit work completed by an affiliated or subsidiary company of the Lead Contractor, identify the full legal name of the affiliate or subsidiary and the role they will have on this Project, so the relevancy of that work can be considered accordingly. Lead Contractor

Francis O. Day Co., Inc. (F.O. Day) was the low bidder on this project in January 2001, and work commenced on July 9, 2001. This interstate paving project located in an urban area involved:

o Maintenance of traffic; o Reconstruction of the Democracy Boulevard bridge over I-270 under traffic; o Construction of a new HOV bridge; o Widening of the existing Westlake Terrace Bridge; o Installation of concrete barrier wall, retaining walls; o Construction of a new noise wall; o Temporary under-pinning for pier cap repairs; o Reconstruction of existing ramp interchange at I-270 and Democracy Boulevard; o Construction of new ramps from Democracy Boulevard to I-270; o Storm drain; o Asphalt paving; o Signalization installations; o Permanent signage (includes overhead and cantilever signs); o Construction of traffic barrier W-beam; and o Final pavement markings.

The reconstruction of the Democracy Boulevard bridge occurred under traffic in phases. The entire existing bridge was removed and replaced with new construction. The traffic was controlled via bolting down single face temporary barrier wall for each phase. The newly constructed HOV Bridge was constructed via placing temporary barrier wall on both sides of I-270 with ingress/egress points created. This bridge had four piers and tied in to the existing Westlake Terrace Bridge. The Westlake Terrace Bridge was widened one lane under traffic as well. I-270 was improved and overlaid with various HMA mixes as well.

SIMILAR SCOPE ACTIVITIES ITS Devices/Systems (DMS, CCTV,

Vehicle Detection, RWIS) Electrical, Communications and Fiber

Optic Conduit, Wiring and Hook-ups Configuring, Integrating and Testing New

ATM Field Devices for Proper Operation and Control

Field Support for System Software Integration and Testing Surveying Asphalt Paving Underlying concrete joint repairs Signing and Striping Overhead Sign Structures/Lighting Dynamic Message Signs Drainage, E&S Control and SWM Concrete Barrier and Pier Protection Maintenance of Traffic Inspection, Testing, QA and QC PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS Completed project on time within Owner

adjusted time frame

This project fulfills RFP/ Addendum#1 requirements 4.2.6 for a project completed constr. within the last fifteen (15) years. In addition this project meets the requirements for: 1. An interstate paving project

with a min. contract value of $10M.

2. An interstate paving project located in urban area with a min. contract value of $15M.

Page 42: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(a)

LEAD CONTRACTOR - WORK HISTORY FORM

(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)

a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime design consulting firm responsible for the overall project design.

c. Contact information of the Client or Owner and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.

d. Contract Completion Date (Original)

e. Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)

f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Dollar Value of Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement.(in thousands)

Original Contract Value

Final or Estimated Contract Value

Name: MD 650 (New Hampshire Avenue) from MD 212 (Powder Mill Road) to North of U.S. 29 Location: Montgomery County, MD

Name: Jacobs Civil, Inc.

Name of Client/Owner: Maryland State Highway Admin. District 3 Phone: 301.513.7300 Project Manager: Neil Haines (currently Resident Construction Engineer, Office of Construction) Phone: 443.572.5233 Email: [email protected]

March 2006 (Original)

Jan 2006 (Actual)

Substantial Completion

$9,597 Contract Value

(Original)

$10,901 Contract Value

(Final)

$6,741 Construction

Fee

h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement. If the Offeror chooses to submit work completed by an affiliated or subsidiary company of the Lead Contractor, identify the full legal name of the affiliate or subsidiary and the role they will have on this Project, so the relevancy of that work can be considered accordingly. Lead Contractor

Francis O. Day Co., Inc. (F.O. Day) was the low bidder on this unique project as it provided the infrastructure for the new Food and Drug Administration (FDA) White Oak Campus. This major arterial paving project in an urban area included the widening of MD 650 (New Hampshire Avenue) from MD 212 (Powder Mill Road) to north of U.S. 29 for a total length of 2.058 miles just outside the I-495 (Capital Beltway). Construction services on this project included:

Construction of three 11-foot through lanes southbound; Four 11-foot through lanes northbound; 5-foot bike lanes in each direction, curb and gutter both sides; 5-foot sidewalk on both sides; 8-foot bike trail along part of northbound side; Retaining walls at the Shopping Center which included a brick form liner with stain applied; Widening of Lockwood Drive (east and west) including sidewalk and bike path construction; Widening of eastbound Powder Mill Road; Widening and removal of all ramps between MD 650 and U.S. 29; Improvements to Shopping Center parking lot; Stormwater management including newly constructed two SWM Ponds; and Grading and drainage improvements for all phases, permanent signs, pavement markings, and permanent signalization at five different

intersections. Through the course of the project, F.O. Day encountered an unknown tie-back system. F.O. Day worked aggressively with the MSHA to restore the structural integrity of the tie-back system and through redesign and construction, while significantly mitigating the impact to MSHA. This project also included numerous permanent utility relocations that required extensive coordination with the utility companies and F.O. Day, along MD 650. The paving on the project consisted of !3,608 TN of 12.5 MM HMA, 9,036 TN of 25 MM HMA, 4,497 TN of 19 MM HMA, and 4,077 TN of 9.5 MM for Wege/Leveling. The Project also required 91,544 SY of Grinding of existing asphalt. F.O. Day completed the Lockwood Drive portion of this project ahead of schedule at the acceptance of MSHA, based on the incentive program established.

SIMILAR SCOPE ACTIVITIES ITS Devices/Systems (DMS, CCTV, Vehicle Detection, RWIS) Electrical, Communications and Fiber

Optic Conduit, Wiring and Hook-ups Configuring, Integrating and Testing New

ATM Field Devices for Proper Operation and Control

Field Support for System Software Integration and Testing Surveying Asphalt Paving Underlying concrete joint repairs Signing and Striping Overhead Sign Structures/Lighting Dynamic Message Signs Drainage, E&S Control and SWM Maintenance of Traffic Inspection, Testing, QA and QC Retaining Wall PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS Nominated for an MdQI Partnering

Award. Completed a portion ahead of schedule,

which was key to the opening of FDA’s White Oak Campus.

Completed the contract within the allotted Contract time of 450 Working Days

This project fulfills RFP/ Addendum#1 requirements 4.2.6 for a project completed constr. within the last fifteen (15) years. In addition this project meets the requirements for: 1. A major arterial paving

project with a min. contract value of $10M.

Page 43: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(a)

LEAD CONTRACTOR - WORK HISTORY FORM

(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)

a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime design

consulting firm responsible for the overall project design.

c. Contact information of the Client or Owner and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.

d. Contract Completion Date (Original)

e. Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)

f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Dollar Value of Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement.(in thousands)

Original Contract Value

Final or Estimated Contract Value

Name: I-270 from North of MD 189 (Falls Road) to Muddy Branch Road Location: Montgomery County, MD

Name: Maryland State Highway Administration

Name of Client/Owner: Maryland State Highway Admin. District 3 Phone: 301.513.7300 Project Manager: Brian Young (currently District Engineer) Phone: 301.513.7300 Email: [email protected]

December 2007 (Original)

November 2007 (Actual)

$9,910 Contract Value

(Original)

$10,133 Contract Value

(Final)

$6,753 Construction

Fee

h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Contractor for this procurement. If the Offeror chooses to submit work completed by an affiliated or subsidiary company of the Lead Contractor, identify the full legal name of the affiliate or subsidiary and the role they will have on this Project, so the relevancy of that work can be considered accordingly. Lead Contractor

Francis O. Day Co., Inc. (F.O. Day) was the low bidder on this project in February 2007, and work commenced on April 23, 2007. This interstate paving project in an urban area involved the resurfacing and safety improvements on I-270 from 1,000 feet north of MD 189 (Falls Road) to Muddy Branch Road. The work consisted of:

o Maintenance of traffic; o Patching; o 686,630 SY of grinding; o 80,745 Tons of gap graded resurfacing; o ADA ramps; and o Traffic barrier W-beam.

The maintenance of traffic included major detours at each interchange, resulting in numerous temporary signs and Variable Message Signs. The sidewalk ramp works were per ADA requirements. All storm drain located within the project limits was cleaned out and flushed. The majority of the permanent striping consisted of Preformed Patterned markings applied during surface paving operations, and all other was Thermoplastic. The Traffic Barrier W-Beam works consisted of special ‘Brown Polyester Coating’ applied prior to shipping. A ‘Road Weather Information Sensor Station’ was installed with detection loops for indicators as well.

SIMILAR SCOPE ACTIVITIES ITS Devices/Systems (DMS, CCTV,

Vehicle Detection, RWIS) Electrical, Communications and Fiber

Optic Conduit, Wiring and Hook-ups Configuring, Integrating and Testing New

ATM Field Devices for Proper Operation and Control

Field Support for System Software Integration and Testing Surveying Asphalt Paving Underlying concrete joint repairs Signing and Striping Overhead Sign Structures/Lighting Dynamic Message Signs Drainage, E&S Control and SWM Concrete Barrier and Pier Protection Maintenance of Traffic Inspection, Testing, QA and QC PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS Complete ahead of schedule.

This project fulfills RFP/ Addendum#1 requirements 4.2.6 for a project completed constr. within the last fifteen (15) years. In addition this project meets the requirements for: 1. An interstate paving project

with a min. contract value of $10M.

Page 44: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Attachment 4.2.6(b) Lead Designer Work History Forms

Page 45: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(b)

LEAD DESIGNER - WORK HISTORY FORM

(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)

a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime/ general contractor responsible for overall construction of the project.

c. Contact information of the Client and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.

d. Construction Contract Completion Date (Original)

e. Construction Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)

f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Design Fee for the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement.(in thousands)

Construction Contract Value (Original)

Construction Contract Value (Actual or Estimated)

Name: I-95/I-695 Interchange (Section 100) Preliminary and Final Design Location: Baltimore/Balt. Co., MD

Name: G.A. & F.C. Wagman, Inc. / McLean Contracting Company A Joint Venture

Name of Client: Maryland Transportation Authority Phone: 410.931.0110 x251 Project Manager: David Labella, P.E. Phone: 410.931.0110 x251 Email: [email protected]

April 2011 (Original)

April 2011 (Actual)

$450,000 Contract Value

(Original)

$450,000 Contract Value

(Actual)

$26,000 Design

Fee

h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement. Include the office location(s) where the design work was performed and whether the firm was the prime designer or a subconsultant. Prime Designer

Design Work Performed at: Sparks, MD (Corporate); Herndon, VA; and York, PA

Developed the planning and preliminary design for Section 100 of the I-95 Express Toll Lane project and final design on the I-95/I-695 Interchange. This $1B project involved complete replacement of three (3) major interchanges and mainline interstate design which implemented the latest technologies in Traffic and ITS Management. Section 100 is the first project within Maryland to implement both general purpose lanes and managed lanes in the same facility. Preliminary and final design services included: Traffic/ITS/Lighting - Designed the communications system for the toll facility as well as field equipment locations used for overall traffic

management purposes. The systems included CCTV surveillance, Remote Weather Information Systems, Highway Advisory Radio, vehicle detection and classification and DMS systems were all included in the design. Interim plans used wireless communications to existing and temporary field devices were developed. Special provisions for all of the specialized ITS equipment were researched, developed and finalized for this project and for use with the adjacent projects. Responsible for electrical design drawings, specifications; voltage drop and computer lighting calculations; and coordination with utilities agencies. This project consisted of High Mast Lighting and Conventional Lighting design in accordance with MDOT/AASHTO requirements. Power distribution and branch circuit designs for both lighting and ITS elements were developed. Performed capacity and operational analyses, design of MOT plans, signing, pavement marking plans, and evaluated constructability issues. The signing plans included new guide signing on the I-95 and I-695 approaches to the interchange including the use of overhead sign structures.

Highway Design - The preliminary design included developing and analyzing multiple concepts for General Purpose and Managed Lanes for I-95’s mainline. In addition, JMT evaluated multiple line and grade options for the I-695 MD 43, and I-895 interchanges. One of the unique challenges was the re-design of the existing “double-braided” directional I-695 interchange to a fully directional multilevel design serving both the Express Toll Lanes and the General Purpose lanes of I-95. The preliminary design encompassed an array of design elements i.e. horizontal and vertical alignment, typical sections, developing and reviewing design standards, minimizing impacts to the existing ROW and utilities. Final design included (11) lane-miles of I-95, (12) lane-miles of I-695, (1) lane-mile of local roads and (16) lane-miles of ramps.

Structural Engineering - Prepared preliminary layouts of bridge structures in a complex network of multilevel interchange design at the MD 43, I-695 & I-895 interchanges that involved many elevated structures for the directional ramps. The preliminary structural design work included superstructure types, span arrangements, pier location and sizes and phased construction. Prepared final design plans for (22) bridges, (38) retaining walls, (7) noise barriers and (5) culverts at the I-95/I-695 interchange.

Additional Services - Wetland and forest delineation, coordination with environmental agencies (MDE, USACOE, MHT, etc.), permitting requirements, drainage and SWM, utility coordination and relocations, H/H analyses and an extensive public involvement and interagency coordination. JMT used focus group meetings with agencies and communities to establish the Purpose and Need, ARDS document and FONSI. Brochures, displays and material for the I-95 Section 100 website were prepared. All design was performed using GEOPAK and MicroStation, in accordance with MDTA, AASHTO and MSHA guidelines.

This project received the ACEC/MD Honor Award for Studies, Research & Consulting Engineering Services; the Mid-Atlantic Award of Merit; the ACI/MD Excellence in Concrete Award; National Partnership for Highway Quality Award; and the MdQI Award of Excellence (Partnering Silver).

SIMILAR SCOPE ACTIVITIES ITS Devices/Systems (DMS, CCTV,

Vehicle Detection, RWIS) Electrical, Communications and Fiber

Optic Conduit, Wiring and Hook-ups Configuring, Integrating and Testing New

ATM Field Devices for Proper Operation and Control

Field Support for System Software Integration and Testing Surveying Asphalt Paving Underlying concrete joint repairs Signing and Striping Overhead Sign Structures/Lighting Dynamic Message Signs Drainage, E&S Control and SWM Concrete Barrier and Pier Protection Maintenance of Traffic Inspection, Testing, QA and QC PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS First highway project in MD to implement

general purpose lanes and express toll lanes together in the same facility.

Implemented the latest technologies in Traffic and ITS Management.

Led the design of improvements to several miles of I-95.

Complete realignment of the I-95/I-695 interchange.

JMT fast tracked the design in 10 months.

This project fulfills RFP/ Addendum#1 requirements 4.2.6 for a project completed constr. within the last fifteen (15) years. In addition this project meets the requirements for: 1. An interstate project located

in an urban area with a min. constr. value of $15M.

2. An ITS highway project with a min. constr. Value of $2M.

Page 46: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(b)

LEAD DESIGNER - WORK HISTORY FORM

(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)

a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime/ general

contractor responsible for overall construction of the project.

c. Contact information of the Client and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.

d. Construction Contract Completion Date (Original)

e. Construction Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)

f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Design Fee for the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement.(in thousands)

Construction Contract Value (Original)

Construction Contract Value (Actual or Estimated)

Name: MD 200 Intercounty Connector (ICC) Contract C (Design-Build) Location: Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties, MD

Name: ICC Constructors (IC3) - Shirley Contracting Company, LLC - Clark Construction Group, LLC - Trumbull Corporation - Atkinson Construction Co., LLC - Facchina Construction Co., Inc. - Dewberry & Davis, LLC

Name of Client: Maryland State Highway Admin. Phone: 410.545.0400 Project Manager: Melinda Peters (Currently MSHA Administrator) Phone: 410.545.0400 Email: [email protected]

November 2011 (Original)

November 2011 (Actual)

$513,900 Contract Value

(Original)

$513,900 Contract Value

(Actual)

$7,077 Design

Fee

h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement. Include the office location(s) where the design work was performed and whether the firm was the prime designer or a subconsultant. Prime Designer

Design Work Performed at: Sparks, MD (Corporate) and Herndon, VA

This project, one of the largest Design-Build contracts in Maryland, included 3.8 miles of new roadway, MD 200, to accommodate three highway lanes in each direction from west of U.S. 29 to east of I-95. Three new interchanges were designed at MD 200/US 29, MD 200/Briggs Chaney Road, and MD 200/I-95. The work also included the reconstruction and widening of 1.3 miles of U.S. 29 from south of Briggs Chaney Road to south of Fairland Road and the reconstruction of 1.9 miles of C-D roads along I-95 from south of MD 198 to north of MD 212. JMT as a subconsultant to the IC3 was the Lead ITS/Electronic Toll Collection (ETC) Engineer and Structural Engineer in addition to support water resources design. Traffic/ITS/Lighting - Led the design of the ETC and the traffic management systems for Contract C. The system included CCTV surveillance,

Dynamic Message Signs, vehicle detection systems, toll rate information signs, ETC toll gantries and the communication systems required to connect the field equipment to the central operations center. This project required constant coordination with utility companies. The design accommodates future improvements within the project limits, including several interchanges, light rail in the U.S. 29 median and electronic toll lanes in the I-95 median. Documents were in accordance with AASHTO, FHWA, MSHA and MDTA policies and coordinated to ensure compatibility and consistency with the overall ICC toll system. Also provided lighting design for the entire project. Both the U.S. 29 and Briggs Chaney Rd. Interchanges were designed for low level lighting using standard, decorative poles and fixtures. Along I-95, high mast lighting was utilized consistent with other areas of I-95. The work also included design of the power supply system for all lighting, toll gantries and signing.

Structural Engineering - The design of over 50 structures, including bridges, culverts, retaining walls and noise barriers, was led by JMT. This work included the design of toll gantries, sign structures and high mast light poles, coordination of four design consultants as well as the liaison between the design team and MSHA, MDTA and the contractor. JMT’s design work included 6 bridges, 3 noise barriers and 14 retaining walls. The bridges included both steel girder and concrete beam superstructures ranging from a 75 foot simple span to a 5-span 1,218 foot curved girder structure. Multiple plan packages were provided to facilitate early construction activities such as pier footings and ordering of long lead items such as structural steel. The bridges, retaining walls and noise barriers included many different aesthetic features unique to the project.

Water Resources - Provided H/H studies, analysis and design; open/closed storm drain design; SWM and ESC analysis, computation and design; H/H, SWM and ESC plans, reports and permits; and consultation during construction for the MD 200 mainline. The SWM and ESC plans were developed to allow multiple phases to reduce areas of earth disturbance while allowing the contractor to meet his schedule of activities throughout the project limits. The ESC plans were coordinated with the MOT plans and utility relocations to facilitate construction activities. Provided detailed H/H design and scour analysis for Little Paint Branch, an environmentally sensitive stream. Performed H/H design for a temporary bridge crossing to be used as part of a haul road during construction. Coordinated the designs with the MSHA, the ICC Project Team and the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) and performed much of the design at the “Hub Office” facilitating the “over the shoulder” review process. JMT obtained MDE permits and approvals from the MDE for the stream crossings, ESC and SWM.

SIMILAR SCOPE ACTIVITIES Surveying Asphalt Paving Underlying concrete joint repairs Signing and Striping Overhead Sign Structures/Lighting Dynamic Message Signs Overhead Lane Control System ITS Devices/Systems (DMS, CCTV,

Detection, Video Analytics & Lane Control)

Electrical, Communications and Fiber Optic Conduit, Wiring and Hook-ups

Configuring, Integrating and Testing New ATM Field Devices for Proper Operation and Control

Field Support for System Software Integration and Testing Drainage, E&S Control and SWM Concrete Barrier and Pier Protection Maintenance of Traffic Inspection, Testing, QA and QC PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS One of the largest D-B projects in MD. Approx.3.8 miles of new six-lane highway. State-of-the-art electronic toll collection

system and traffic management system. Design of over 50 structures (toll gantries,

sign structures and high mast light poles).

This project fulfills RFP/ Addendum#1 requirements 4.2.6 for a project completed constr. within the last fifteen (15) years. In addition this project meets the requirements for: 1. A major arterial project

located in an urban area with a min. constr. value of $15M.

2. An ITS highway project with a min. constr. Value of $2M.

Page 47: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

ATTACHMENT 4.2.6(b)

LEAD DESIGNER - WORK HISTORY FORM

(LIMIT 1 PAGE PER PROJECT)

a. Project Name & Location b. Name of the prime/ general

contractor responsible for overall construction of the project.

c. Contact information of the Client and their Project Manager who can verify Firm’s responsibilities.

d. Construction Contract Completion Date (Original)

e. Construction Contract Completion Date (Actual or Estimated)

f. Contract Value (in thousands) g. Design Fee for the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement.(in thousands)

Construction Contract Value (Original)

Construction Contract Value (Actual or Estimated)

Name: Fairfax County Parkway Extension Phases I/II and IV (Design-Build) Location: Springfield, VA

Name: Cherry Hill Construction, Inc.

Name of Client: Federal Highway Administration Eastern Federal Lands Highway Div. Phone: 703.404.6302 Project Manager: Robert Morris

Phone: 703.404.6302 Email: [email protected]

Phases I/II December 2010

(Original)

Phase IV July 2011 (Original)

Phases I/II September 2010

(Actual)

Phase IV July 2011 (Actual)

$73,756 Contract Value

(Excluded Owners Option #3 and

Phase IV)

$112,416 Contract Value

(Actual) Increase due to be awarded

Phase IV

$11,538 Design

Fee

h. Narrative describing the Work Performed by the Firm identified as the Lead Designer for this procurement. Include the office location(s) where the design work was performed and whether the firm was the prime designer or a subconsultant. Prime Designer

Design Work Performed at: Sparks, MD (Corporate); Herndon and Richmond, VA

The EFLHD, as the representative for VDOT/U.S. Army Garrison Fort Belvoir /Fairfax County, selected the Design-Build Team that included Cherry Hill Construction as the Contract and JMT as the Lead Designer, for this $112M D-B project. The 4-lane divided limited access highway completed the missing connection of FCP to I-95 and provides critical access to the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency’s (NGA) facility at Fort Belvoir EPG. To meet the requirements of BRAC the FCP project had an extremely aggressive schedule of 750 calendar days to design, permit, relocate utilities, and construct the parkway. The design team initiated design upon notice of award beginning in October 2008 and delivered approval for construction plans that allowed constr. of the western end (west of Accotink Creek) of the project to commence in April 2009. Full plan approval for the remainder of the contract was received in August 2009, approximately 3 months ahead of schedule. This accelerated design schedule allowed earlier construction starts that enabled the opening of Phases I/II in Sept. 2010, nearly a month ahead of scheduled. Traffic/ITS/Lighting - JMT’s Lead Traffic/ITS engineer Randy Boice, PE, originally designed the ITS communication backbone through the

project area around the I-95 ramps. This knowledge allowed JMT to design around the backbone such that there was absolutely no disturbance to the I-95 traffic management system during construction. Other responsibilities included the signing and pavement marking design for the mainline, side streets and ramps; traffic analysis; signal designs for 6 intersections; and roadway lighting (full and partial interchange and crossroad lighting) design. Corridors with new signals were modeled and optimized. CORSIM, VISSIM and Synchro were all used in the design development and corridor optimization.

Design - The design included a new interchange at FCP and Barta Rd. for access to West North Loop Rd. (NGA interior roadway network) within the new NGA facility. Extensive design collaboration/coordination with the U.S. Army for this access point was required and included coordination for UXO clearing, security lighting, overheight vehicle detection, geometry/utility connections. A majority of this roadway was located on the southern portion of the EPG. Environmental challenges were further complicated by the fast-track schedule, involvement of multiple stakeholders, and complex environmental and regulatory issues. Design services included a comprehensive investigation of the nature and extent of the contamination on several of these areas, including groundwater modeling to evaluate the impact of construction on the fate and transport of multiple contaminated groundwater plumes. The project also included widening of I-95 to accommodate a new exit lane designed as a certified Defense Access Rd. that provides direct access to the NGA. JMT completed the Base Option and Options 1-3 including Phase IV. Phase IV was completed in July 2011 and provides access to N.B. FCP from Boudinot Dr. by extending Boudinot Dr. beneath the FCP and constructing Loop B. Phase IV also provided a connection from FCP N.B. to Boudinot Dr. via Ramp B; and access from S.B. FCP to Boudinot Dr. via Ramp D and a new bridge crossing Accotink Creek

Key staff members received “Star Partner” awards for their exceptional dedication, teamwork, and professionalism in support of the project's goals by the NGA. The President of the U.S. made two visits to the project, initially to indicate the importance of the project to the NOVA roadway network, and secondly for Phase IV, which was heralded for the project's timely and effective use of ARRA funds.

SIMILAR SCOPE ACTIVITIES Surveying Asphalt Paving Underlying concrete joint repairs Signing and Striping Overhead Sign Structures/Lighting Dynamic Message Signs Overhead Lane Control System ITS Devices/Systems (DMS, CCTV,

Detection, Video Analytics & Lane Control)

Electrical, Communications and Fiber Optic Conduit, Wiring and Hook-ups

Configuring, Integrating and Testing New ATM Field Devices for Proper Operation and Control

Field Support for System Software Integration and Testing Drainage, E&S Control and SWM Concrete Barrier and Pier Protection Maintenance of Traffic Inspection, Testing, QA and QC PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS Completed a vital link to I-95 in NOVA. The project was recognized by DBIA

National & Mid-Atlantic Region, ACEC/VA, ACEC/MD, ACEC/MW and VTCA

Project finished a month ahead of schedule with an extremely aggressive schedule.

This project fulfills RFP/ Addendum#1 requirements 4.2.6 for a project completed constr. within the last fifteen (15) years. In addition this project meets the requirements for: 1. A major arterial project

located in an urban area with a min. constr. value of $15M.

Page 48: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Conceptual Roadway PlansAttachment 4.2.7

4.2.7 Conceptual Roadway Plans

Page 49: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

DHV

V (MPH)

REVISED

STATE LINE

CITY,TOWN OR VILLAGERIGHT OF WAY LINEFENCE LINEUNFENCED PROPERTY LINEFENCED PROPERTY LINEWATER LINESANITARY SEWER LINEGAS LINEELECTRIC UNDERGROUND CABLETRAVELED WAYGUARD RAILRETAINING WALLRAILROADSBASE OR SURVEY LINE

LEVEE OR EMBANKMENTBRIDGESCULVERTSDROP INLETPOWER POLESTELEPHONE OR TELEGRAPH POLESTELEPHONE OR TELEGRAPH LINESHEDGETREESHEAVY WOODSGROUND ELEVATIONGRADE ELEVATION

CONVENTIONAL SIGNS

30

30

+50

DATUM LINE

DATUM LINE

173

175

T/Tg

E

6" W

8" S

4" G

PLPL

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

PLAN AND PROFILE OF PROPOSED

STATE HIGHWAY

SCALE

FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION AND TRAFFIC DATA

D (%) (design hour)

T (%) (design hour)

1

WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED.

THE ORIGINAL APPROVED TITLE SHEET(S), INCLUDING ORIGINAL

SIGNATURES, ARE FILED IN THE VDOT CENTRAL OFFICE PLAN LIBRARY.

ANY MISUSE OF ELECTRONIC FILES, INCLUDING SCANNED SIGNATURES,

IS ILLEGAL AND ENFORCED TO THE FULL EXTENT OF THE LAW.

ALL CURVES ARE TO BE SUPERELEVATED, TRANSITIONED AND

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION OR TO REGULATION

AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT.

THIS PROJECT IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE

FOR SECTION NUMBERS)

(SEE TABULATION BELOW

STATE

PROJECT

NO.

SECTIONEQUALITIES

FEET

LENGTH INCLUDINGFEDERAL AID

PROJECT NO.FEET FEETMILES MILES

LENGTH EXCLUDINGTYPE

PROJECTDESCRIPTIONBRIDGE(S) BRIDGE(S)TYPE

CODE

UPC

NO.

BRIDGE

PROJECT

NO.

Project Lengths are based on Construction Baseline.

AND BRIDGE STANDARDS, 2009 MUTCD, 2011 VIRGINIA SUPPLEMENT TO

AMENDED BY CONTRACT PROVISIONS AND THE COMPLETE ELECTRONIC

PDF VERSION OF THE PLAN ASSEMBLY.

THE MUTCD, 2011 VIRGINIA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL AND AS

DEPARTMENT'S 2007 ROAD AND BRIDGE SPECIFICATIONS, 2008 ROAD

COUNTY LINE

Cell Revised 12/11/12

GEOPAK Computer Identification No. 105130

DESIGN PACKAGE (GEOPAK).

THIS PROJECT WAS DEVELOPED UTILIZING THE DEPARTMENT'S ENGINEERING

800'0' 1600'

FAIRFAX COUNTY

70 MPH

Fairfax County Population 1,109,725 (2012 Census)

INTERSTATE 495

TO MARYLA

ND

TO TYSONS CORNER

S

TA. 2

11+8

2.4

2E

ND

PR

OJE

CT

WIDENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD TC 5.11R, EXCEPT

GW

PA

RK

WA

Y

STATEFEDERAL AID STATE

PROJECT PROJECTROUTE

VA.

PROJECT SHEET NO.

VIRGINIA

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS

SHEET

NO.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Copyright 2014, Commonwealth of Virginia

JMT_d10513001.dgn

Plotted By: COLLINS

12:17:51 PM

JMT_d10513001.dgn

1P

ROJE

CT

MA

NA

GE

R

SU

RV

EY

ED

BY,

DA

TE

DE

SIG

N

BY

SU

BS

UR

FA

CE

UTILIT

Y

BY,

DA

TE

S

TA. 115

+75.0

0B

EGIN P

ROJE

CT

495STP-495-5(094)

I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE PROJECT

0495-029-123

P101, C501PROJECT #0495-029-123

P-101

C-501

PENGSTP-495-5(094)

STP-495-5(094)

105130

105130F000

1.82 1.82 PRELIM. ENG.

CONSTRUCTION1.82 1.82

--- ---

--- ---

(FO) 0495-029-123 FHWA 534 DATA 4A144

ADT (2013)

Whit

man Requardt

&

Associates (7

03) 293-9

717

04

95-029-123

FROM: SOUTH OF OLD DOMINION DRIVE

FROM: SOUTH OF OLD DOMINION DR

FROM: SOUTH OF OLD DOMINION DR

FR: SOUTH OF OLD DOMINION DRIVE

VD

OT

TO: GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY

TO: GW MEMORIAL PARKWAY

TO: GW MEMORIAL PARKWAY

TO: GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY

RIGHT OF WAY

PERFORMED WITHIN EXISTING

ALL CONSTRUCTION IS TO BE

Sta. to Sta. Approval DateReasons for Exception

Sta. to Sta. Shoulder Width Approval DateReasons for Exception

Sta. to Sta. Approval DateReasons for Exception

Sta. 122+00 to Sta. 207+00

Sta. 122+00 to Sta. 207+00

Sta. 150+00 to

Sta. 207+00

ADT (2035)

100%

4.3%

TIER 2 PROJECT

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION

APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION

APPROVED

DATE

DATE

DATE

DATE

DATE DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

STATE LOCATION AND DESIGN ENGINEER

PROGRAMMING DIVISION DIRECTOR

CHIEF ENGINEER

DATE STATE STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE ENGINEER

CHIEF OF PROGRAMMING AND PLANNING

during Peak HoursShoulder Use Lane

DESIGN EXCEPTIONS TO INTERSTATE 495

Paul

Nis

him

oto (5

71) 4

83-2

622

100 110 12

0

130

140

150

160

170 18

0

190

200

210

220

PC

PT

PC

GE

OR

GE

TO

WN PIK

E

OL

D

DO

MIN

ON

DRIV

E

PT P

C

PT

PC

PT

PC

PT

I-495 NORTHBOUND (GS-5) - LEVEL

REDUCED NORTHBOUND LANE AND SHOULDER WIDTHS

INSIDE SHOULDER WIDTH SOUTHBOUND AT SIGN STRUCTURES

USE, OUTSIDE AND AUXILIARY LANES

HORIZONTAL SIGHT DISTANCE NORTHBOUND INSIDE SHOULDER

Widths

Barrier modification forsign structures

Varies 6'-8'

Varies 0.5'-12'Provide width for

Shoulder Use Lane

Sight Distance

495' & 645'

109,000 (ONE WAY)

177,400 (ONE WAY)

11,000 (ONE WAY)

INDEX OF SHEETS

TITLE SHEET

PLAN SHEETS

1

DESCRIPTIONSHEET NO. STATIONS

3-10

1E(1) - 1E(5)

104+00 to 216+00

CONCEPT PLANSMARCH 12, 2014

CONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT AND SUPERELEVATION DATA SHEETS

2A(1) - 2A(4) TYPICAL SECTIONS AND DETAILS

12(1) - 12(11) SIGNING AND ITS COMMUNICATION AND CONTROL PLANS

CONDUIT AND CABLE SCHEDULE12(O) - 12(OA)

Johnson, Mir

miran and Tho

mpson 703-4

64-7

369

ACHIEVED.

PROPOSED CLEARANCE WILL BE

REQUIRED TO DETERMINE HOW

BRIDGE UNDER CLEARANCE

FIELD SURVEY OF EXISTING

Page 50: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

0

SCALE

100' 200'

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 13

0+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 1E(2)

1E(1)

1E(1)

C1

C2

C2C1

STA. 115+75.00

BEGIN PROJECT 0495-029-123, P101, C501

LI-495 NORTHBOUND B

Curve NBB001

PI = 108+91.27

T = 891.27'

L = 1,782.31'

R = 46,043.27'

100+00.00PC =

PT = 117+82.31

Curve NBB002

PI = 131+87.79

T = 861.46'

L = 1,704.54'

R = 4,770.00'

123+26.33PC =

PT = 140+30.87

E = MATCH EXISTING E = 4.23%

V = 70 MPH

PC 10

0+0

0.0

0

100

105

110

115

PT 117

+82.3

1

120

PC 12

3+2

6.3

3

125

130

SUPERELEVATION DATA SHEETCONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT AND

EXIS

TIN

GM

EE

T

EXIS

T.

ME

ET

2.0

0%

1.50

%

TO

2.0

0%

1.50

%

TO

3.0

0%

2.0

0%

TO

4.2

3%

4.2

3%

3.0

0%

2.0

0%

TO

EXIST.FROMTRANS.

EXIST.FROMTRANS.

AS PER TC 5.1

1R

TRANS. TO FULL S

UPERELEVATION

PER TC 5.11RFULL S

UPER.TRANS. TO

AS PER SHEETS 2A(2) AND 4ADJUST SUPERELEVATION

EXISTING BRIDGE UNDER CLEARANCEAS REQUIRED TO MAINTAINADJUST SUPERELEVATION

THRU LANESSUPERELEVATION

FULL

SHOULDER USE LANESUPERELEVATIONFULL

1.5% TO 2% THRU LANES

OVERLAY EXISTING CROSS SLOPE

2% TO 3% SHOULDER USE LA

NE

OVERLAY EXISTING CROSS SLOPE

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_d10513001e(1).dgn

Plotted By: COLLINS10:28:02 AM

JMT_d10513001e(1).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

Page 51: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

0

SCALE

100' 200'

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 130+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 1E(1)

1E(2)

1E(2)

C2

C2

C3

C3

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 16

0+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 1E(3)

LI-495 NORTHBOUND B

Curve NBB002

PI = 131+87.79

T = 861.46'

L = 1,704.54'

R = 4,770.00'

123+26.33PC =

PT = 140+30.87

Curve NBB003

PI = 160+34.88

T = 1,163.27'

L = 2,283.06'

R = 4,830.00'

148+71.61PC =

PT = 171+54.66

E = 4.23% E = 4.18%

V = 70 MPH V = 70 MPH

130

135

140

PT 14

0+3

0.8

7

145

PC 14

8+7

1.61

150

155

160

4.2

3%

4.2

3%

2.0

0%

1.50

%

TO

PER TC 5.11R

FULL SUPER.

TRANS. FROM

3.0

0%

2.0

0%

TO

PER TC 5.11R

TRANS. FROM FULL SUPERELEVATION

2.0

0%

1.50

%

TO

4.18

%

AS PER TC 5.11R

TRANS. TO FULL SUPERELEVATION

3.0

0%

2.0

0%

TO

4.18

%

PER TC 5.11R

FULL SUPER.

TRANS. TO

SUPERELEVATION DATA SHEETCONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT AND

THRU LANES

SUPERELEVATION

FULL

SHOULDER USE LANES

SUPERELEVATION

FULL

THRU LANES

SUPERELEVATION

FULL

SHOULDER USE LANE

SUPERELEVATION

FULL

THRU LANES

1.5% TO 2%

CROSS SLOPE

OVERLAY EXISTING

SHOULDER USE LANE

2% TO 3%

CROSS SLOPE

OVERLAY EXISTING

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_d10513001e(2).dgn

Plotted By: COLLINS10:25:55 AM

JMT_d10513001e(2).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

Page 52: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

0

SCALE

100' 200'

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 190+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 1E(4)

1E(3)

1E(3)

C3MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 16

0+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 1E(2)

C3 C4

C4

LI-495 NORTHBOUND B

Curve NBB003

PI = 160+34.88

T = 1,163.27'

L = 2,283.06'

R = 4,830.00'

148+71.61PC =

PT = 171+54.66

Curve NBB004

PI = 186+04.22

T = 755.68'

L = 1,439.16'

R = 1,910.00'

178+48.54PC =

PT = 192+87.70

E = 4.18% E = 7.95%

V = 70 MPH V = 70 MPH

160

165

170

PT 17

1+54.6

6

175

PC 17

8+4

8.5

4

180

185

190

4.18

%

4.18

%

7.9

5%

7.9

5%

AS PER

TC 5.11R

TRANSITIO

N BETWEEN F

ULL SUPERELEVATI

ON

AS PER

TC 5.11R

TRANSITIO

N BETWEEN F

ULL SUPERELEVATI

ON

SUPERELEVATION DATA SHEETCONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT AND

SHOULDER USE LANE

SUPERELEVATION

FULL

THRU LANES

SUPERELEVATION

FULL

SHOULDER USE LANESUPERELEVATION

FULL

THRU LANESSUPERELEVATIONFULL

TO REQUIREDCLEARANCE UNDER BRIDGETO INCREASE EXISTINGADJUST SUPERELEVATION

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_d10513001e(3).dgn

Plotted By: COLLINS10:24:26 AM

JMT_d10513001e(3).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

Page 53: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

0

SCALE

100' 200'

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 190+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 1E(3)

1E(4)

1E(4)

C4

C5

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 2

20+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 1E(5)

LI-495 NORTHBOUND B

Curve NBB004

PI = 186+04.22

T = 755.68'

L = 1,439.16'

R = 1,910.00'

178+48.54PC =

PT = 192+87.70

Curve NBB005

PI = 221+05.40

T = 922.98'

L = 1,724.11'

R = 1,950.00'

211+82.42PC =

PT = 229+06.54

C4

C5

STA. 211+82.42

END PROJECT 0495-029-123, P101, C501

E = MATCH EXISTINGE = 7.95%

V = 70 MPH V = 70 MPH

190

PT 19

2+8

7.70

195

200

205

210

PC 211+8

2.42

215

220

7.9

5%

7.9

5%

3.0

0%

2.0

0%

TO

AS PER TC 5.11R

TRANSITION FROM FULL SUPERELEVATION

2.00

%

1.50

%

TO

2.00

%

1.50

%

TO

EXIS

TIN

G

ME

ET

3.00

%

2.00

%

TO

EXIS

TIN

G

ME

ET

TO EXIST.

TRANSITION

TRANSITION TO EXISTING

AS PER TC 5.11R

TRANS. FROM FULL SUPER.

THRU LANES

FULL SUPERELEVATION

SUPERELEVATION DATA SHEETCONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT ANDSHOULDER USE LANE

FULL SUPERELEVATION

1.5% TO 2% THRU LANES

OVERLAY EXISTING CROSS SLOPE

2% TO 3% SHOULDER USE LANE

OVERLAY EXISTING CROSS SLOPE

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_d10513001e(4).dgn

Plotted By: COLLINS10:23:02 AM

JMT_d10513001e(4).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

Page 54: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

0

SCALE

100' 200'

1E(5)

1E(5)

C5

C5

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 2

20+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 1E(4)

C5

LI-495 NORTHBOUND B

Curve NBB005

T = 922.98'

L = 1,724.11'

R = 1,950.00'

211+82.42PC =

PT = 229+06.54

E = MATCH EXISTING

V = 70 MPH

PI = 221+05.40

C4

C3

C2

C1

I-495 NORTHBOUND CONSTRUCTION BASELINE

220

225

PT 229+0

6.5

4

Ending chain 495REV2 description =============================================================================== Chord Bear = N 34° 53' 12.82" E Ahead = N 9° 33' 27.14" E Back = N 60° 12' 58.50" E C.C. N 476,706.88 E 3,654,476.66 P.T. Station 229+06.54 N 476,383.10 E 3,656,399.60 P.C. Station 211+82.42 N 475,014.46 E 3,655,445.28 Mid. Ord. = 187.47 Long Chord = 1,668.50 External = 207.41 Radius = 1,950.00 Length = 1,724.11 Tangent = 922.98 Degree = 2° 56' 17.68" Delta = 50° 39' 31.36" (LT) P.I. Station 221+05.40 N 475,472.93 E 3,656,246.35 Curve NBBO05 *----------* Curve Data Course from PT NBBO04 to PC NBBO05 N 60° 12' 58.50" E Dist 1,894.72 Chord Bear = N 38° 37' 49.58" E Ahead = N 60° 12' 58.50" E Back = N 17° 02' 40.66" E C.C. N 472,415.60 E 3,654,749.59 P.T. Station 192+87.70 N 474,073.30 E 3,653,800.84 P.C. Station 178+48.54 N 472,975.45 E 3,652,923.49 Mid. Ord. = 133.95 Long Chord = 1,405.36 External = 144.06 Radius = 1,910.00 Length = 1,439.16 Tangent = 755.68 Degree = 2° 59' 59.20" Delta = 43° 10' 17.84" (RT) P.I. Station 186+04.22 N 473,697.93 E 3,653,144.99 Curve NBBO04 *----------* Curve Data Course from PT NBBO03 to PC NBBO04 N 17° 02' 40.66" E Dist 693.88 Chord Bear = N 30° 35' 09.55" E Ahead = N 17° 02' 40.66" E Back = N 44° 07' 38.43" E C.C. N 473,727.80 E 3,648,102.25 P.T. Station 171+54.66 N 472,312.05 E 3,652,720.10 P.C. Station 148+71.61 N 470,364.89 E 3,651,569.20 Mid. Ord. = 134.27 Long Chord = 2,261.86 External = 138.11 Radius = 4,830.00 Length = 2,283.06 Tangent = 1,163.27 Degree = 1° 11' 10.49" Delta = 27° 04' 57.77" (LT) P.I. Station 160+34.88 N 471,199.88 E 3,652,379.13 Curve NBBO03 *----------* Curve Data Course from PT NBBO02 to PC NBBO03 N 44° 07' 38.43" E Dist 840.73 Chord Bear = N 33° 53' 24.43" E Ahead = N 44° 07' 38.43" E Back = N 23° 39' 10.44" E C.C. N 466,440.28 E 3,654,407.71 P.T. Station 140+30.87 N 469,761.41 E 3,650,983.83 P.C. Station 123+26.33 N 468,353.98 E 3,650,038.42 Mid. Ord. = 75.94 Long Chord = 1,695.49 External = 77.17 Radius = 4,770.00 Length = 1,704.54 Tangent = 861.46 Degree = 1° 12' 04.21" Delta = 20° 28' 27.99" (RT) P.I. Station 131+87.79 N 469,143.06 E 3,650,384.04 Curve NBBO02 *----------* Curve Data Course from PT NBBO01 to PC NBBO02 N 23° 39' 10.44" E Dist 544.02 Chord Bear = N 22° 32' 38.24" E Ahead = N 23° 39' 10.44" E Back = N 21° 26' 06.04" E C.C. N 449,383.33 E 3,691,995.46 P.T. Station 117+82.31 N 467,855.66 E 3,649,820.17 P.C. Station 100+00.00 N 466,209.64 E 3,649,136.88 Mid. Ord. = 8.62 Long Chord = 1,782.20 External = 8.63 Radius = 46,043.27 Length = 1,782.31 Tangent = 891.27 Degree = 0° 07' 27.98" Delta = 2° 13' 04.40" (RT) P.I. Station 108+91.27 N 467,039.26 E 3,649,462.59 Curve NBBO01 *----------* Curve Data =============================================================================== Beginning chain 495REV2 description

SUPERELEVATION DATA SHEETCONSTRUCTION ALIGNMENT AND

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_d10513001e(5).dgn

Plotted By: COLLINS10:21:50 AM

JMT_d10513001e(5).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

Page 55: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

TYPICAL SECTIONSNOT TO SCALEL

11' 11' 12' 12' 11'

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER

B

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE

SHOULDER USE LANE

2A(1)

2A(1)

L

11' 11' 12' 12' 11'

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER

B

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE

SHOULDER USE LANE

2.5'

SEE INSET B

SEE INSET B

NOT TO SCALE

INSET A

NOT TO SCALE

INSET B

Exist. Crown Pt.

13

Prop. Crown Pt.BL

Varies

1

46

8

8

SEE INSET A

SEE INSET A

MEDIAN BARRIER BUMPOUT DETAIL

SIGN STRUCTURE

VARIES 140' - 280'

STA 115+77.64 TO STA 123+27.00

OLD DOMINION DRIVE

STA 123+27.00 TO STA 123+62.49

NOT TO SCALE

FULL DEPTH PATCH/ JOINT REPAIR

1 2 39

2'

PROP. UD-4

PROP. UD-4

10

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE

EXISTING FINISHED GRADEEXISTING CONCRETE BARRIER

3 IN. MAX*

MEASURED FROM EXISTING FACE OF BARRIER*

32"

BARRIER MODIFICATION

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE

EXISTING FINISHED GRADEEXISTING CONCRETE BARRIER

3 IN. MAX*

MEASURED FROM EXISTING FACE OF BARRIER*

32"

MECHANICAL ANCHORS

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE

EXISTING FINISHED GRADE

EXISTING CONCRETE BARRIER3 IN. MAX*

MEASURED FROM EXISTING FACE OF BARRIER*

ST'D BPPS-1 REQ'D

TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION

BARRIER MODIFICATION DETAIL 1 BARRIER MODIFICATION DETAIL 2 BARRIER MODIFICATION DETAIL 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

FOR USE WHEN MEDIAN IS SINGLE BARRIER FOR USE WHEN MEDIAN IS DOUBLE BARRIER

full strength pavement with PCC or expose existing edge of PCC pavement

Full depth sawcut at edge of existing mainline pavement to expose existing

High Friction Surface Coating To Delineate Shoulder Use Lane

Mill and Overlay Existing Pavement Minimum Depth of 4"

with 4% hydraulic cement by weight

Subbase - 6" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21A pugmill mixed

Subbase - 8" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21B

Base - 12" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Base - 14" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Variable Depth Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

2.5" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Surface - 1.5" Stone Matrix Asphalt, SMA-9.5E (PG 76-22)

Ex. 16' clr.

Pro

p. 16' min. clr.

See Note 8St'd GS-11

St'd GS-11

See Note 8

1.50% - 2.00%

1.50% - 2.00%

9:1 - 10.8:1 TAPER

NEW SINGLE-SLOPE FACE

9:1 - 10.8:1 TAPER

NEW SINGLE-SLOPE FACE

9:1 - 10.8:1 TAPER

NEW SINGLE-SLOPE FACE

LONGITUDINAL TAPER RATE OF 26:1.

2. BARRIER MODIFICATIONS SHALL HAVE A

WHERE IMPACTED OR DAMAGED.

1. BARRIER GLARE SHIELDS TO BE REPLACED

NOTES:

9' - 12'

12'

PROP. GR-2

BARRIER MODIFICATION DETAIL 4

EXISTING FINISHED GRADE

MEASURED FROM EXISTING FACE OF BARRIER*

3 IN. MAX*

CONCRETE BARRIER

EXISTING

FINISHED GRADE

EXISTING

FINISHED GRADE

PROPOSED

(TYP.)

MECHANICAL ANCHORS

9:1 - 10.8:1 TAPER

SLOPE FACE

NEW SINGLE-

9:1 - 10.8:1 TAPER

NEW SINGLE-SLOPE FACE

MECHANICAL ANCHORS

3 IN. MAX*MEASURED FROM EXISTING FACE OF BARRIER*

BARRIER MODIFICATION DETAIL 2-A

MECHANICAL ANCHORS

BARRIER

CONCRETE

EXISTING

FINISHED GRADE

PROPOSED

FINISHED GRADE

EXISTING

ON PLANS

LABELED

BIFURCATION

ON PLANS

LABELED

BIFURCATION

ON PLANS

LABELED

BIFURCATION

32"

NEW F-SHAPE FACE

(TYP.)

MECHANICAL ANCHORS

32"

32"

32"

FOR USE WHEN MEDIAN IS BIFURCATED DOUBLE BARRIER

NORTHBOUND SIDE LOWER

FOR USE WHEN MEDIAN IS BIFURCATED

NORTHBOUND SIDE HIGHER

FOR USE WHEN MEDIAN IS BIFURCATED

Ex. Joint

6'

4.5'

Sawcut (PCC only)

Full Depth

3

9" Ex. PCC

6" Ex. CTA 6" Ex. CTA

9" Ex. PCC

4"-5" Ex. Asphalt4"-5" Ex. Asphalt

USE LANE.

THE SLOPE SHALL MAINTAIN 5% ROLLOVER AT THE EDGE OF THE SHOULDER

SHALL MATCH THE SHOULDER USE LANE SLOPE. ON THE HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION

9. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE OF THE LATERAL OFFSET

NOTES:

SHALL MATCH EXISTING, BUT MAINTAIN MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER.

WITHOUT A ROLLOVER. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE

8. ON HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE IS TO MATCH THE SUPERELEVATION

OF 10 LB/SY.

CONSISTING OF NO. 10 AGGREGATE OR GRADING B SAND SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE

0.2 GAL/SY. WHERE NECESSARY FOR MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC, COVER MATERIAL

COURSE, IT SHALL BE LIQUID ASPHALT CRS-1, CRS-1H OR CMS-2 APPLIED AT A RATE OF

7. WHEN LIQUID ASPHALT IS USED AS A CURING MATERIAL FOR THE CEMENT STABILIZED

6. FINAL SURFACE TO BE PLACED UNIFORMLY ACROSS THE ENTIRE PAVEMENT.

CRACKS IN AC OR PCC PAVEMENT.

TYPE B CRACK SEALANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR SEALING

5. ALL CRACKS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ALL DEBRIS AFTER MILLING AND SEALED WITH

AND SHOULDER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF FINAL SURFACE LAYERS OF ASPHALT.

4. FULL DEPTH/JOINT REPAIRS ARE TO BE PERFORMED ON THE FULL WIDTH OF PAVEMENT

FOR SLOPE CORRECTION.

3. VARIABLE DEPTH MILL AND OVERLAY MAY BE NECESSARY

2. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DATA REPORT FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN.

REFER TO PLAN SHEETS.

1. FOR LIMITS OF MILL AND OVERLAY AND FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT,

NOTES:

**See Note 9

**Varies 2.5' - 8'

**See Note 9

**

SEE SHEETS 1E(1) THRU 1E(4)

SEE SHEETS 1E(1) THRU 1E(4)

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_d10513002a(1).dgn

Plotted By: COLLINS11:20:46 AM

JMT_d10513002a(1).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

Page 56: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

TYPICAL SECTIONSNOT TO SCALE

L

11' 11' 12' 12' 11'

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER

B

SHOULDER USE LANE

2A(2)

2A(2)

L

11' 11' 12' 12' 11'

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER

B

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE

SHOULDER USE LANE

5' - 12'

SEE INSET B

SEE INSET A

STA 123+62.49 TO STA 125+89.30

SCOTTS RUN BRIDGESTA 125+89.30 TO STA 128+07.45

2'

PROP. UD-4

NOT TO SCALE

INSET A

NOT TO SCALE

INSET B

Exist. Crown Pt.

13

Prop. Crown Pt.BL

Varies

1

46

8

8

NOT TO SCALE

FULL DEPTH PATCH/ JOINT REPAIR

Ex. Joint

6'

4.5'

Sawcut (PCC only)

Full Depth

3

1 2 39 10

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAILBARRIER MODIFICATION

2" MILLING AND OVERLAY

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADESEE INSET A

SEE INSET B

2'

PROP. UD-4

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAILBARRIER MODIFICATION

L

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE

B

SHOULDER USE LANE

STA 128+07.45 TO STA 148+00.00

11' 11' 12' 12' 11'2.5'

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

full strength pavement with PCC or expose existing edge of PCC pavement

Full depth sawcut at edge of existing mainline pavement to expose existing

High Friction Surface Coating To Delineate Shoulder Use Lane

Mill and Overlay Existing Pavement Minimum Depth of 4"

with 4% hydraulic cement by weight

Subbase - 6" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21A pugmill mixed

Subbase - 8" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21B

Base - 12" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Base - 14" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Variable Depth Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

2.5" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Surface - 1.5" Stone Matrix Asphalt, SMA-9.5E (PG 76-22)

MATCH EXISTING

TRANSITION LENGTH

NOT TO SCALE

PAVEMENT TIE-IN

13

4" MIN.

8EXISTING PAVEMENT

POINTS WITH THE PAVEMENT SURFACE SHALL NOT EXCEED ‚".

315.07(A) OF THE SPECIFICATIONS. THE VARIATION FROM THE TESTING EDGE OF THE STRAIGHT EDGE BETWEEN ANY TWO CONTACT

AT TIE-IN LOCATIONS SHALL BE DESIGNED USING A 10-FOOT STRAIGHT EDGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION

2. PAVEMENT TIE-IN SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 315.05(C) OF THE SPECIFICATION EXCEPT THAT ALL JOINTS

SCOTTS RUN BRIDGE, AT RAMP TIE-INS AND AT THE BEGINNING/END OF PROJECT. TRANSITION LENGTH SHALL BE 150' MINIMUM.

1. PAVEMENT TIE-IN SHALL BE USED TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION BETWEEN PAVEMENT OVERLAY AND EXISTING PAVEMENT AT

NOTES:

TIE INTO EXISTING

See Note 8St'd GS-11

St'd GS-11

600

1

1.50% - 2.00%

See Note 8 1.50% - 2.00%

3.5'

See

3.5'

5'-6'

6'-9'

9" Ex. PCC

6" Ex. CTA 6" Ex. CTA

9" Ex. PCC

4"-5" Ex. Asphalt4"-5" Ex. Asphalt

IMPACTED DUE TO PAVEMENT BUILDUP.

10. MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER. EXISTING EXPANSION JOINT TO BE REPLACED WHERE

USE LANE.

THE SLOPE SHALL MAINTAIN 5% ROLLOVER AT THE EDGE OF THE SHOULDER

SHALL MATCH THE SHOULDER USE LANE SLOPE. ON THE HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION

9. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE OF THE LATERAL OFFSET

SHALL MATCH EXISTING, BUT MAINTAIN MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER.

WITHOUT A ROLLOVER. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE

8. ON HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE IS TO MATCH THE SUPERELEVATION

OF 10 LB/SY.

CONSISTING OF NO. 10 AGGREGATE OR GRADING B SAND SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE

0.2 GAL/SY. WHERE NECESSARY FOR MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC, COVER MATERIAL

COURSE, IT SHALL BE LIQUID ASPHALT CRS-1, CRS-1H OR CMS-2 APPLIED AT A RATE OF

7. WHEN LIQUID ASPHALT IS USED AS A CURING MATERIAL FOR THE CEMENT STABILIZED

6. FINAL SURFACE TO BE PLACED UNIFORMLY ACROSS THE ENTIRE PAVEMENT.

CRACKS IN AC OR PCC PAVEMENT.

TYPE B CRACK SEALANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR SEALING

5. ALL CRACKS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ALL DEBRIS AFTER MILLING AND SEALED WITH

AND SHOULDER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF FINAL SURFACE LAYERS OF ASPHALT.

4. FULL DEPTH/JOINT REPAIRS ARE TO BE PERFORMED ON THE FULL WIDTH OF PAVEMENT

FOR SLOPE CORRECTION.

3. VARIABLE DEPTH MILL AND OVERLAY MAY BE NECESSARY

2. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DATA REPORT FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN.

REFER TO PLAN SHEETS.

1. FOR LIMITS OF MILL AND OVERLAY AND FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT,

NOTES:

**Varies 2.5' - 4.5'

**See Note 9

**See Note 9

**

SEE SHEETS 1E(1) THRU 1E(4)

SEE SHEETS 1E(1) THRU 1E(4)

Note 10

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513002a(2).dgn

Plotted By: COLLINS11:24:50 AM

d10513002a(2).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

Page 57: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

TYPICAL SECTIONS

L

11' 11' 12' 12' 11'

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER

B

NOT TO SCALE

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE

SHOULDER USE LANE

2A(3)

2A(3)

2.5'

SHOULDER 2'

STA 128+00 TO 148+50

SEE INSET DSEE INSET A

12'

SHOULDER

STA 155+00 TO 163+50

STA 158+00 TO 162+00

GEORGETOWN PIKESTA 164+52.40 TO STA 165+26.00

2'

NOT TO SCALE

INSET A

NOT TO SCALE

INSET B

Exist. Crown Pt.

13

Prop. Crown Pt.BL

Varies

1

46

6

8

NOT TO SCALE

1 23

9 10

NOT TO SCALE

1

578

3 10

JOINT REPAIR

FULL DEPTH PATCH/ INSET D

TRANSITION LENGTH

NOT TO SCALE

1

EXISTING PAVEMENT

ST'D BPPS-1 REQ'D

TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION

L

11' 11' 12' 12' 11'2.5'

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE SHOULDER

B

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADESEE INSET A

SHOULDER USE LANE

SEE INSET C

STA 148+00.00 TO STA 164+52.40

2'

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAILBARRIER MODIFICATION

I-495 NORTHBOUND

NOT TO SCALE

INSET C

1

578

3 10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

full strength pavement with PCC or expose existing edge of PCC pavement

Full depth sawcut at edge of existing mainline pavement to expose existing

High Friction Surface Coating To Delineate Shoulder Use Lane

Mill and Overlay Existing Pavement Minimum Depth of 4"

with 4% hydraulic cement by weight

Subbase - 6" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21A pugmill mixed

Subbase - 8" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21B

Base - 12" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Base - 14" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Variable Depth Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

2.5" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Surface - 1.5" Stone Matrix Asphalt, SMA-9.5E (PG 76-22)

EXISTING ELEVATION

Transition Detail

MILLING (4" MIN.) PROPOSED ELEVATIONAT GEORGETOWN PIKE

MILLING (5" MIN.)

13

TO OBTAIN MIN. 16'-0" CLEARANCEONLY REQ'D AT GEORGETOWN PIKE BRIDGE

Ex. 15'-9" clr.

Pro

p. 16' min. clr.

PROP. UD-4

PROP. UD-4

PROP. UD-4

PROP. UD-4

See Note 8 St'd GS-11

St'd GS-11

St'd GS-11

St'd GS-11

St'd GS-11See Note 8

600

3% - 4.18% Super

4.18% Super

ST'D BPPS-1 REQ'D

TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION

6'

4'-24'

24' WIDE SHOULDER

2'-4'

Ex. Joint

6'

4.5'

Sawcut (PCC only)

Full Depth

3

9" Ex. PCC

6" Ex. CTA 6" Ex. CTA

9" Ex. PCC

4"-5" Ex. Asphalt4"-5" Ex. Asphalt

USE LANE.

THE SLOPE SHALL MAINTAIN 5% ROLLOVER AT THE EDGE OF THE SHOULDER

SHALL MATCH THE SHOULDER USE LANE SLOPE. ON THE HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION

9. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE OF THE LATERAL OFFSET

SHALL MATCH EXISTING, BUT MAINTAIN MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER.

WITHOUT A ROLLOVER. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE

8. ON HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE IS TO MATCH THE SUPERELEVATION

OF 10 LB/SY.

CONSISTING OF NO. 10 AGGREGATE OR GRADING B SAND SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE

0.2 GAL/SY. WHERE NECESSARY FOR MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC, COVER MATERIAL

COURSE, IT SHALL BE LIQUID ASPHALT CRS-1, CRS-1H OR CMS-2 APPLIED AT A RATE OF

7. WHEN LIQUID ASPHALT IS USED AS A CURING MATERIAL FOR THE CEMENT STABILIZED

6. FINAL SURFACE TO BE PLACED UNIFORMLY ACROSS THE ENTIRE PAVEMENT.

CRACKS IN AC OR PCC PAVEMENT.

TYPE B CRACK SEALANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR SEALING

5. ALL CRACKS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ALL DEBRIS AFTER MILLING AND SEALED WITH

AND SHOULDER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF FINAL SURFACE LAYERS OF ASPHALT.

4. FULL DEPTH/JOINT REPAIRS ARE TO BE PERFORMED ON THE FULL WIDTH OF PAVEMENT

FOR SLOPE CORRECTION.

3. VARIABLE DEPTH MILL AND OVERLAY MAY BE NECESSARY

2. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DATA REPORT FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN.

REFER TO PLAN SHEETS.

1. FOR LIMITS OF MILL AND OVERLAY AND FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT,

NOTES:

**See Note 9

**

SEE SHEETS 1E(1) THRU 1E(4)

SEE SHEETS 1E(1) THRU 1E(4)

TO INCREASE CLEARANCE

INCREASE FULL DEPTH

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513002a(3).dgn

Plotted By: COLLINS11:32:01 AM

d10513002a(3).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

Page 58: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

TYPICAL SECTIONSNOT TO SCALE

L

11' 11' 12' 12' 11'4.6'

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE

B

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE

SHOULDER USE LANE

2A(4)

2A(4)

L

11' 11' 12' 12' 11'2.5'

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE

B

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADESEE INSET A

SHOULDER USE LANE

L

11' 11' 12' 12' 11'2.5'

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE

B

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE

SHOULDER USE LANE

SEE INSET C

SEE INSET B

SEE INSET A

SEE INSET A

SHOULDER

11'

AUX. LANE SHOULDER

SEE INSET B

11'

AUX. LANE SHOULDER

STA 165+26.00 TO STA 172+00.00

LIVE OAK DRIVESTA 186+38.50 TO STA 186+70.58

STA 186+70.58 TO STA 211+81.74

2'

2'

PROP. UD-4

PROP. UD-4

NOT TO SCALE

INSET A

NOT TO SCALE

INSET B

Exist. Crown Pt.

13

Prop. Crown Pt.BL

Varies

1

46

6

8

NOT TO SCALE

FULL DEPTH PATCH/ JOINT REPAIR

1 2 39 10

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAILBARRIER MODIFICATION

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAILBARRIER MODIFICATION

ST'D BPPS-1 REQ'D

TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION

L

11' 11' 12' 12' 11' 11'2.5'

I-495 NORTHBOUND

THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE THRU LANE

B

PROPOSED FINISHED GRADESEE INSET A

SHOULDER USE LANE

SEE INSET B

AUX. LANE SHOULDER

STA 172+00.00 TO STA 186+38.50

PROP. UD-4

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAILBARRIER MODIFICATION

NOT TO SCALE

INSET C

1

578

3 10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

full strength pavement with PCC or expose existing edge of PCC pavement

Full depth sawcut at edge of existing mainline pavement to expose existing

High Friction Surface Coating To Delineate Shoulder Use Lane

Mill and Overlay Existing Pavement Minimum Depth of 4"

with 4% hydraulic cement by weight

Subbase - 6" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21A pugmill mixed

Subbase - 8" Aggregate Base Material, Type I, Size No. 21B

Base - 12" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Base - 14" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D +0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Variable Depth Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

2.5" Asphalt Concrete Type BM-25.0D + 0.4 (HMHB, PG 70-22)

Surface - 1.5" Stone Matrix Asphalt, SMA-9.5E (PG 76-22)

1.50% - 2.00%

1.50% - 2.00%

1.50% - 2.00%

PROP. UD-4

See Note 8 St'd GS-11

St'd GS-11

St'd GS-11

St'd GS-11

See Note 8

See Note 8

See Note 8

1.50% - 2.00%

8'-12'

8'-12'

9.5'

8'-11'

Ex. Joint

6'

4.5'

Sawcut (PCC only)

Full Depth

3

9" Ex. PCC

6" Ex. CTA 6" Ex. CTA

9" Ex. PCC

4"-5" Ex. Asphalt4"-5" Ex. Asphalt

USE LANE.

THE SLOPE SHALL MAINTAIN 5% ROLLOVER AT THE EDGE OF THE SHOULDER

SHALL MATCH THE SHOULDER USE LANE SLOPE. ON THE HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION

9. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE OF THE LATERAL OFFSET

SHALL MATCH EXISTING, BUT MAINTAIN MAXIMUM 5% ROLLOVER.

WITHOUT A ROLLOVER. ON TANGENT AND LOW SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE

8. ON HIGH SIDE OF SUPERELEVATION THE SLOPE IS TO MATCH THE SUPERELEVATION

SAND SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 10 LB/SY.

TRAFFIC, COVER MATERIAL CONSISTING OF NO. 10 AGGREGATE OR GRADING B

APPLIED AT A RATE OF 0.2 GAL/SY. WHERE NECESSARY FOR MAINTENANCE OF

STABILIZED COURSE, IT SHALL BE LIQUID ASPHALT CRS-1, CRS-1H OR CMS-2

7. WHEN LIQUID ASPHALT IS USED AS A CURING MATERIAL FOR THE CEMENT

6. FINAL SURFACE TO BE PLACED UNIFORMLY ACROSS THE ENTIRE PAVEMENT.

FOR SEALING CRACKS IN AC OR PCC PAVEMENT.

WITH TYPE B CRACK SEALANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS

5. ALL CRACKS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ALL DEBRIS AFTER MILLING AND SEALED

LAYERS OF ASPHALT.

OF PAVEMENT AND SHOULDER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF FINAL SURFACE

4. FULL DEPTH/JOINT REPAIRS ARE TO BE PERFORMED ON THE FULL WIDTH

FOR SLOPE CORRECTION.

3. VARIABLE DEPTH MILL AND OVERLAY MAY BE NECESSARY

DESIGN.

2. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING DATA REPORT FOR PAVEMENT

REFER TO PLAN SHEETS.

1. FOR LIMITS OF MILL AND OVERLAY AND FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT,

NOTES:

**See Note 9

**

**

**See Note 9

**

**See Note 9

SEE SHEETS 1E(1) THRU 1E(4)

SEE SHEETS 1E(1) THRU 1E(4)

SEE SHEETS 1E(1) THRU 1E(4)

SEE SHEETS 1E(1) THRU 1E(4)

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

d10513002a(4).dgn

Plotted By: COLLINS11:39:59 AM

d10513002a(4).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

Page 59: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Scotts Run

DeckDeck

Deck

Mile

Marker

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

SS 10

0+0

0.0

0

=

03°0

2'5

2" Lt.

PI 105+9

8.6

8

279. 10' Rt.

+11. 33

MONF 235. 97' Rt.

+64. 66

MONF

64

64-a

(a)

(b)

64-b

64-c

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

24

24-a

Inv. Out = 242. 37'

In Pl. 6" Plastic Pipe

In Pl. U. D.

25

63

63-a

25-a

64-d

65

64-e

Soundwall

Face Of

Soundwall

Face OfExist. R/W & L/A Line

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway Survey Baseline

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

S. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

N. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per V

DOT Highw

ay Plan 0

413-029-007, R

W-2

Exist. R

/W

& L/

A Line

E

TT

TCTC

TC

Elec.

HH

Lig

ht

Pole

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

Cab.

Traf.

Cab.

F. O.

MH

F. O.

MH

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

PT 117

+82.3

1

118

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_d10513003.dgn

Plotted By: COLLINS10:38:14 AM

JMT_d10513003.dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

0

SCALE

50' 100'

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 118

+00 S

EE

SH

EE

T 4

3

3

LEGEND

Denotes Proposed Pavement

Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement

Denotes Demolition of Pavement

C1

C1

STA. 115+75.00

BEGIN PROJECT 0495-029-123 P101, C501

I-495 NORTHBOUND

I-495 SOUTHBOUND

I-495 NORTHBOUND BL

T = 891.27'

L = 1,782.31'

R = 46,043.27'

100+00.00PC =

PT = 117+82.31

PI = 108+91.27

Curve NBB001

UNDERDRAIN UD-4

and Joint Repair Number

Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location#

E = MATCH EXISTING

V = 70 MPH

150' MIN.

SEE NOTE 3

EN

D

PA

V'T

TIE-I

N

BE

GIN P

AV'T

TIE-I

N

APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).

4. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION

SHEET 2A(2).

3. FOR TRANSVERSE PAVEMENT TIE-IN DETIAL SEE TYPICAL SECTION

FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.

2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN

TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.

1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR

NOTES:

BARRIER MODIFICATION DETAIL 3

BIFURCATED 18" TO 30"

Page 60: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Gate

Scotts R

un

Brush

Scotts

Run

Deck

Deck

Metal Guardrail

Conc. Jersey Wall

Scotts

Run

285

294

296

111

112

113 11

4 115 11

6 117 11

8 119

120

121

122

123

124

=

00°5

7'4

3"

Rt.

PI 112

+44.0

2

=

06°0

2'18"

Rt.

PI 118

+87.2

6

78. 12' Lt.+58. 22IPF

77. 93.' Lt.+55. 43MONF

212. 35' Rt.

+8. 54

MONF

233. 69' Rt.

+89. 75

MONF

469. 19' Rt.+23. 97MONF

439. 36' Rt.+3. 20

MONF

26

26-a

27-a

62

62-a

27-B

Inv. Out = 233. 63'In Pl. 6" Plastic PipeIn Pl. U. D.

28

28-d

28-c28-b

28-a

293

294

296

295

298

297

1175

1174

1173

28-e

Conc. Ditch

SoundwallFace Of

SoundwallFace Of

SoundwallFace Of

Per V

DOT

Highw

ay

Plan 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. R/

W

& L/

A Line

Per VDOT Hi

ghway Plan

0413-029-00

7, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A

Line

Per V

DO

T

Hig

hway Pla

n 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist.

R/

W

Per V

DOT Highw

ay Plan 0

413-029-007, R

W-2

Exist. R

/W

& L/

A Line

Per

VDOT Highw

ay Plan

0413-029-007, R

W-2

Exist.

R/W

& L/

A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

S

TCTC

TC

C

D S

Lig

ht

Pole

Lig

ht

Pole

EOI

EOI

EOI

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

PT 117

+82.3

1

118 119 12

0 121 122 123

PC 12

3+2

6.3

3

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_d10513004.dgn

Plotted By: COLLINS10:37:02 AM

JMT_d10513004.dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 118

+00 S

EE

SH

EE

T 3

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 132

+00 S

EE

SH

EE

T 5

0

SCALE

50' 100'

4

4

I-495 NORTHBOUND

I-495 SOUTHBOUND

I-495 NORTHBOUND BL

OL

D

DO

MINIO

N

RO

AD

C2

C2 Curve NBB002

PI = 131+87.79

T = 861.46'

L = 1,704.54'

R = 4,770.00'

123+26.33PC =

PT = 140+30.87

PROPOSED MB-7DPROPOSED MB-7D

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 122+36.40 TO STA. 123+65.87

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 130+30.36 TO STA. 131+69.96

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

37 14 19

23

UNDERDRAIN UD-4

LEGEND

Denotes Proposed Pavement

Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement

Denotes Demolition of Pavement

and Joint Repair Number

Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location# E = 4.23%

V = 70 MPH

MODIFY EXISTING BARRIERST'D BPPS-1 REQ'D

TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION

150' MIN.

BE

GIN P

AV'T

TIE-I

N

EN

D

PA

V'T

TIE-I

N

EN

D

PA

V'T

TIE-I

N

BE

GIN P

AV'T

TIE-I

N

SEE NOTE 4SEE NOTE 4

150' MIN.

PROPOSED GR-2

PROP GR-FOA-2

PROPOSED GR-FOA-2

APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).

5. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACE AT A LOCATION

SHEET 2A(2).

4. FOR TRANSVERSE PAVEMENT TIE-IN DETAIL SEE TYPICAL SECTION

SURVEY.

3. THE OLD DOMINION BRIDGE SHOWN FROM SUPPLEMENTAL

FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.

2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN

TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.

1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR

NOTES:

BIFURCATED 18" TO 30"

DETAIL 3BARRIER MOD.

3" TO 9"BIFURCATED 0" TO 3"

REPLACE BARRIER BIFURCATED 18" TO 30"

BIFURCATED 18" TO 30"

REPLACE BARRIER

MB-7EMB-7E

MOD. DETAIL 3BARRIER

9" TO 18"

18"

9" TO

REPLACE BARRIER

Page 61: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

125

126

127 12

8 129 13

0 131 13

2

133

134

135

136

137

138

=

07°5

6'3

9" Rt.

PI 126+3

1.34 =

03°0

5'3

3"

Rt.

PI 132

+23.11

=

00°5

0'4

0"

Rt.

PI 137+6

5.0

8

74. 50' Lt.

+97. 26

IPF

74. 56' Lt.

+87. 81

MONF

230. 31' Rt.

+41. 90

IPF223. 98' Rt.+7. 74

IPF

216. 43' Rt.+30. 22IPF

1172

1462

1183

1182

1181

(a)

(b)

1178

1179

1180

1177

1176

1188

1189

29

29-a

23

23-a

1185-a

1185-b

1186

1187

(a)

(b)

(Variable Width R. O. W.)S. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

(Variable Width R. O. W.)N. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

Per VDOT Highway Plan

0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A L

ine

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

O/

H

Sig

n

Gate

Brush

Churchill R

oad

I-495 - Capital Beltway (Inner Loop)

I-495 - Capital Beltway (Outer Loop)

Deck

Deck

Deck

Deck

Deck

Deck

Conc.

Conc.

Pool

Sub-Station

Rip-Rap

Asphalt Shoulder

Metal Guardra

il

Reflector

Reflector

Woven Wire Fence

Riser

TC

TC

S

S

TC

TC

TC

A

B

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

F. O.

MH

132 13

3 134 13

5

136

137

138

139

140

PT 14

0+3

0.8

7

141

142

143

144

145

146

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_d10513005.dgn

Plotted By: COLLINS10:40:49 AM

JMT_d10513005.dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 146+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 6

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 13

2+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 4

0

SCALE

50' 100'

5

5

C2

C2

I-495 NORTHBOUND

I-495 SOUTHBOUND

I-495 NORTHBOUND BL

Curve NBB002

PI = 131+87.79

T = 861.46'

L = 1,704.54'

R = 4,770.00'

123+26.33PC =

PT = 140+30.87

PROPOSED MB-7D

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 139+30.37 TO STA. 140+70.18

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

37

4448

58

62

63

75

LEGEND

Denotes Proposed Pavement

Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement

Denotes Demolition of Pavement

and Joint Repair Number

Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location# E = 4.23%

V = 70 MPH

MODIFY EXISTING BARRIER

APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).

3. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION

FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.

2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN

TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.

1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR

NOTES:

REPLACE BARRIER BIFURCATED 3" TO 9"

REPLACE BARRIER BIFURCATED 18" TO 30"

REPLACE BARRIER BIFURCATED 9" TO 18"

MB-7E

Page 62: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

139

140

141

142

143

144 14

5 146 14

7 148 14

9 150 15

1

152

=

06°4

4'2

6" Lt.

PI 143

+63.3

9

=

08°18'3

7" Lt.

PI 151+24.6

7

60. 24' Lt.+51. 57MONF

427. 00' Rt.+58. 41IPF

461. 89' Rt.+27. 19IPF

243. 84 Rt.+84. 347MONF237. 02' Rt.

+61. 02

IPF

244. 30' Rt.+94. 95MONF

1184 30

30-a

31-a

31

1190

1191

1192

1193

32

32-a

1194

1195

19

18

17

15

21

20

16

1

14

1424

1423

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

Soundwall

Face Of

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per V

DOT High

way Plan 0

413-02

9-007, R

W-2

Exist. R/W

& L/

A Lin

e

Per V

DOT

Hig

hway P

lan 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. R

/W

& L/

A Line

Per VDOT

Highwa

y Plan

0413-02

9-007, R

W-2

Exist.

L/A Lin

e

Per VDOT

Highway

Plan 041

3-029-00

7, RW-2

Exist. R/

W

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. L/A Line

E

E

TC

TC

T

TC

T

Traf.

Cab.

Traf.

HH

w/

F. O.

Cab.

Power Pole

F. O.

HH

Traf.

Cab.

Elec.

HH

Traf.

HH

F. O.

HH

TC

Traf.

HH

O/

H

Sig

n

U/C

Tennis Ct.

Area U/C

I-495 - Capital Beltway (Inner Loop)

I-495 - Capital Beltway (Outer Loop)

Paved Parking

Paved Parking

Pave

d Parking

Paved Parkin

g

Paved Parkin

g

Paved Parkin

g

Paved Parking

Paved

Parking

Pave

d Parkin

g

Balls Hill Road - VA Route 686

Helga Place

Deck

Deck

Ramp

Brush

Trailer

Trailer

Canopy

Fla

g Pole

Obscured

Asphalt Shoulder

Conc. Jersey

Wall

Mile

Marker

Sig

n

Sig

n

Sig

n

Grass

Brush

Gravel Shoulder

Reflector

Wood Ret. Wall

Riser

1425

146

147

148

PC 14

8+7

1.61

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156 157 15

8 159 16

0

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_d10513006.dgn

Plotted By: COLLINS10:46:20 AM

JMT_d10513006.dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 146+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 5

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 16

0+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 7

0

SCALE

50' 100'

6

6

C3

C3

I-495 NORTHBOUND BL I-495 SOUTHBOUND

I-495 NORTHBOUND

Curve NBB003

PI = 160+34.88

T = 1,163.27'

L = 2,283.06'

R = 4,830.00'

148+71.61PC =

PT = 171+54.66

WIDE SHOULDER AREA

APPROXIMATE LOCATION FOR

PROPOSED MB-7D

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 153+26.78 TO STA. 154+70.75

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 158+31.24 TO STA. 159+70.67

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

91

117

122

LEGEND

Denotes Proposed Pavement

Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement

Denotes Demolition of Pavement

and Joint Repair Number

Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location# E = 4.18%

V = 70 MPH

15'

98

BE

GIN P

AV'T

TIE-I

N

SEE NOTE 3

150' MIN.

EN

D

PA

V'T

TIE-I

N

ZONE

BARRIER FOR WORK

TEMPORARY CONCRETESEE NOTE 4

PRIOR TO WORK ZONE

OF EXISTING SHOULDER

APPROXIMATE LOCATIONZONE

BARRIER FOR WORK

TEMPORARY CONCRETE

APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).

5. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION

OF CONSTRUCTION.

4. FINAL FULL DEPTH SHOULDER WIDTH TO BE DETERMINED AT TIME

SHEET 2A(2).

3. FOR TRANSVERSE PAVEMENT TIE-IN DETAIL SEE TYPICAL SECTION

FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.

2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN

TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.

1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR

NOTES:

BIFURCATED3" TO 9"

BARRIER3" TO 9"

REPLACE BARRIER

MOD. DETAIL 3BIFURCATED9" TO 18" BARRIER MODIFCATION DETAIL 3 BIFURCATED 18" TO 30"

MB-7E

MB-7E

PROPOSED MB-7D

BARRIER MODIFCATION DETAIL 3 BIFURCATED 18" TO 30"

BIFURCATED 1

8" TO 3

0"

DETAIL 3BARRIER

MODIFCATI

ON

0" TO 3"

REPLACE BARRIER REPLACE

Page 63: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

153

154

155

156

157

158 15

9 160

161

162

163

164

165

166

=

09°5

7'2

4" Lt.

PI 157+5

7.9

7

=

03°4

7'0

0" Lt.

PI 165+4

2.3

3

151. 85' Lt.+33. 06MONF

204. 29' Lt.+51. 27MONF200. 45' Lt.

+91. 06

MONF

1196-a

1196

1197-a

1197-b

2

3

1200-a

1200

12011202

1427

(a)

(b)

Soundwall

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

S. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

N. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0

413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Li

ne

Per V

DO

T

Hig

hway Pla

n 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. L

/A

Lin

e

Per V

DOT

Hig

hway Pla

n 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist.

R/

W

Per VDOT

Highway

Plan 041

3-029-00

7, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L

/A Line

Per VDOT Highway P

lan 0413-029-

007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A

Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per V

DOT

Highw

ay Plan 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. R

/W

& L/

A Line

Per V

DOT Highw

ay Plan

0413-029-007, R

W-2

Exist. R/

W

& L/

A Line

Sig

n

Brush

Brush

Conc.

Paved P

arking

Paved P

arking

Paved P

arking

Sound Ba

rrier Wal

l

Ramp

Ramp

Ramp

Asphalt Shoulder

Asphalt

Asphalt

Conc. Jersey Wall

Sig

n Reflector

Sign

Sign

Sign

Sign

(2) Signs

Sign

Reflector

Sign

Sign

Reflector

Sig

n

Buildings

Maint.

Signs

Sig

nSig

n

Asphalt

SignSi

gn

Sig

n

Gravel Shoulder

Asphalt Trail

CG-2

CG-2

Gravel S

hould

er

Gravel S

hould

er

Stone Column

Sign

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

T

TC

E

TC

Traf.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

Cab.

Elec.

HH

Elec.

Box

Traf. Sig

nal

Elec.

HH

Hydrant

EOI

EOI

EOI

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Traf.

Cab.

Utility Pole

EOI

w/

Traf.

Cab.

Utility Pole

F. O.

HH

F. O.

Wit. Post

F. O.

Wit. Post

F. O.

HH

F. O.

HH

F. O.

HH

F. O.

Wit. Post

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170 171

PT 17

1+54.6

6

172 17

3 174

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_d10513007.dgn

Plotted By: COLLINS10:58:44 AM

JMT_d10513007.dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 17

4+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 8

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 160+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 6

0

SCALE

50' 100'

7

7

C3

C3

I-495 SOUTHBOUND

I-495 NORTHBOUND BL

I-495 NORTHBOUND

GE

OR

GE

TO

WN PIK

E (R

TE 19

3)

Curve NBB003

PI = 160+34.88

T = 1,163.27'

L = 2,283.06'

R = 4,830.00'

148+71.61PC =

PT = 171+54.66

WIDE SHOULDER AREA

APPROXIMATE LOCATION FOR

PROPOSED MB-7DPROPOSED MB-7D

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 163+26.92 TO STA. 164+72.22

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 169+26.37 TO STA. 170+70.96

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

133

142 146151

160

LEGEND

Denotes Proposed Pavement

Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement

Denotes Demolition of Pavement

and Joint Repair Number

Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location#E = 4.18%

V = 70 MPH

8.5'

ST'D BPPS-1 REQ'D

TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION

150' MIN.

SEE NOTE 4

EN

D

PA

V'T

TIE-I

N

ST'D BPPS-1 REQ'D

TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION

APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).

5. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION

SHEET 2A(2).

4. FOR TRANSVERSE PAVEMENT TIE-IN DETAIL SEE TYPICAL SECTION

SURVEY.

3. THE GEORGETOWN PIKE BRIDGE IS SHOWN FROM SUPPLEMENTAL

FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.

2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN

TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.

1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR

NOTES:

BIFURCATED 18" TO 30"

BARRIER MODIFICATION DETAIL 3

BIFURCATED 9" TO 18"

BARRIER MOD. DETAIL 3 BARRIER MOD. DETAIL 3 BIFURCATED 9" TO 18"

BARRIER MOD. DETAIL 1 BIFURCATED 0" TO 3"

MB-7EMB-7E

PROPOSED BARRIER GATE LOCATION

BIFURCATED 9" TO 18"

REPLACE BARRIER

CLEARANCE TO 16'

INCREASE VERTICAL UNDER

REPLACEMENT AS REQUIRED TO

INCREASE FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT

Page 64: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

167

168

169

170

171

172

173 17

4

175

176

177

178

179

180

= 15°5

7'0

1" Rt.

PI 173+17.4

2

=

13°2

9'5

6"

Rt.

PI 177+7

2.7

2

47. 12'

Lt.+65. 34

MONF

56. 70'

Lt.+83. 51

MONF

1427

1204

1203

1206

1205-a

1205-b

40-b

40-a

39-b

41-a

41-b

101

102

100

4

61

60

103

104

105

106

107

42-a

42-b

1204-a

154155

105-a

258. 26' Rt.+26

. 35IPF

363. 86' Rt.

+89. 02

PPF

386. 23' Rt.

+93. 24

MONF

460. 01' Rt.

+99. 41

MONF

Conc. Ditch

Conc.

Ditch

Conc. Ditch

Soundwall

Soundwall

Soundwall

Soundwall

Face Of

Per VDOT

Highwa

y Plan

0413-0

29-007, RW-2

Exist. R/

W & L/A

Line

Per VDOT

Highway

Plan 041

3-029-00

7, RW-2

Exist. R/

W & L/A Li

ne

Per V

DOT High

way Plan 0

413-02

9-007, RW-2

Exist. L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line The

Limited

Access Line In T

his

Area.

Unclear

As T

o The

Locatio

n Of

The

Existin

g Hi

ghwa

y Plans

Are

Per

VDOT Highw

ay Plan

0413-029-007, R

W-2

Exist. R/W

Line

Per VDOT

Highway Pla

n 0413-

029-007

, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L

/A Line

Live Oak Drive

Benja

min Street

Balls Hill Road - VA Route 686

Balls Hill Road - V

A Ro

ute 68

6

Paved

Parking

Deck

Deck

Conc.

Asphalt Shoulder

O/

H

Sig

n

EE

V

F. O.

HH

F. O.

Wit. Post

F. O.

Wit. Post

EOI

F. O.

Wit. Post

F. O.

HH

F. O.

HH

F. O.

Wit. Post

F. O.

Wit. Post

F. O. Ped.

(DA

TU

R)

(DA

TU

R)

(DATUR)

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_d10513008.dgn

Plotted By: COLLINS11:03:50 AM

JMT_d10513008.dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

174

175

176

177

178

PC 17

8+4

8.5

4

179

180 18

1 182

183

184

185

186

187

188

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 16

7+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 7

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 188+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 9

0

SCALE

50' 100'

8

8

C4

C4

I-495 SOUTHBOUND

I-495 NORTHBOUND BL

I-495 NORTHBOUND

LIV

E

OA

K

DRIV

E

Curve NBB004

PI = 186+04.22

T = 755.68'

L = 1,439.16'

R = 1,910.00'

178+48.54PC =

PT = 192+87.70

PROPOSED MB-7D

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 177+31.00 TO STA. 178+70.50

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 184+59.78 TO STA. 187+49.91

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

166

179

171

UNDERDRAIN UD-4

LEGEND

Denotes Proposed Pavement

Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement

Denotes Demolition of Pavement

and Joint Repair Number

Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location#E = 7.95%

V = 70 MPH

PROPOSED MB-7D

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 181+30.35 TO STA. 182+71.03

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

ST'D BPPS-1 REQ'D

TL-5 BRIDGE PIER PROTECTION

150' MIN.

SEE NOTE 4

BE

GIN P

AV'T

TIE-I

N

APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).

3. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION

FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.

2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN

TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.

1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR

NOTES:

BIFURCATED9" TO 18"REPLACE

BARRIER

18" TO 30"REPLACE BARRIER BIFURCATED PROPOSED MB-7D

BIFURCATED 30" TO 42"

REPLACE BARRIER

BIFURCATED

BARRIER

REPLACE

30" TO 42"

MB-7E

MB-7E

MB-7E

REPLACE BARRIE

R BIFURCATED 0

" TO 3"

Page 65: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

181

182

183

184

185

186

187

188

189

190

191

192

193

194

195

=

14°2

2'5

7" Rt.

PI 182+7

1.51

=

01°19'2

1" Rt.

PI 190+4

8.6

8

116. 73' Lt.

+23. 49

IPF

42-b

110

109

59

108

58

111

112

43-a

43-b

113

114

115

116

118

119

120

121

57

122

123

124

44-a

44-b

5 6

125126

127

129

128

117-a

117-b

460. 01'

Rt.+99. 41

MONF

261. 52' Rt.+68.

24MONF

506. 83' Rt.+1. 6

2MONF

259. 87' Rt.

+41. 94

MONF

(a)

(b)

Conc. Ditch

Conc. Ditch

Sou

ndwall

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

S. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

N. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

Per V

DOT

Hig

hway

Plan 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. R/

W

Line

Per VDOT

Highway Pla

n 0413-

029-007

, RW-2

Exist.

L/A Lin

e Per VDOT H

ighway Plan

0413-029-0

07, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A

Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per VDOT H

ighway Pla

n 0413-029

-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/

A Line

Gate

Live Oak Drive

Arbor Lane

Paved Parking

Paved Parking

Live Oak Drive

Ramp

Deck

DeckDeck

Sound Barrier

Wall

Metal Guardrail

Metal Guardrail

E

E

E

TC

TC

TCTC

TC

TC

TC

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Lig

ht

Pole

Elec.

Cab.

F. O.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

Cab.

(DATUR)

(DA

TU

R)

(DA

TU

R)

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_d10513009.dgn

Plotted By: COLLINS11:07:48 AM

JMT_d10513009.dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

188

189

190 19

1 192

PT 19

2+8

7.7

0

193

194

195

196

197

198

199

200

201

202

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 18

8+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 8

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 2

02

+00 S

EE

SH

EE

T 10

0

SCALE

50' 100'

9

9

C4

C4

I-495 SOUTHBOUND

I-495 NORTHBOUND BL

I-495 NORTHBOUND

Curve NBB004

PI = 186+04.22

T = 755.68'

L = 1,439.16'

R = 1,910.00'

178+48.54PC =

PT = 192+87.70

218

228236

241

250

UNDERDRAIN UD-4

LEGEND

Denotes Proposed Pavement

Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement

Denotes Demolition of Pavement

and Joint Repair Number

Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location#E = 7.95%

V = 70 MPH

PROPOSED MB-7D

SEE SHEET 2A(1) FOR DETAIL

STA. 188+71.24 TO STA. 190+11.05

MEDIAN BUMPOUT FOR SIGN STRUCTURE

APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).

3. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION

FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.

2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN

TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.

1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR

NOTES:

REPLACE BARRIER BIFURCATED 30" TO 42"

30" TO 42

"BIFURCATEDBARRIERREPLACE

18" TO 30"

BIFURCATED

REPLACE BARRIER

BARRIER MOD. DETAIL 2A

BIFURCATED 9" TO 18"

BARRIER MOD. DETAIL 2A

BIFURCATED 3" TO 9"

MB-7E

Page 66: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

196

197

198

199

200

201

202

203

204

205

206

207

208

209

=

00°2

8'5

0" Lt.

PI 195+8

3.3

0

=

18°4

2'3

2"

Rt.

PI 2

01+95.6

5

= 28°5

6'5

1" Lt.

PI 2

07+8

5.8

9

359. 82' Lt.

+37. 66

IPF

128

45-a

45-b

7 8

131130

132

133

910

11

12

11-a

134

135

136137

56 55

138

139140

46-a

46-b

141

142

143

144

47

48

291. 87' Rt.

+34. 42

MONF

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

(a)(b)

Conc.

Ditch

Conc. DitchConc. Ditch

Conc. D

itch

Conc. DitchConc. Ditch

Soundwall

Soundwall

Face Of

Per V

DOT

Highw

ay Plan 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. L/

A Lin

e

E

E

E

E E

E

E

E

E

E

T

EE

Elec.

HH

F. O.

HH

F. O.

HH

Elec.

HH

F. O.

HH

Elec.

HH

F. O.

HH

F. O.

HH

F. O.

Wit. Post

F. O.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

Meter

Elec.

HH

Tele.

HH

Elec.

HH

E

Elec.

HH

F. O.

HH

(DA

TU

R)

(DA

TU

R)

Dense Trees

O/

H

Sig

n

Cellular

Antenna

Crash

Barrier

O/

H

Sig

n

George W

ashington Mem

orial Parkw

ay

Deck

Sound Barrier Wall

Ramp

Metal Guardrail

Metal Guardrail

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_d10513010.dgn

Plotted By: COLLINS12:54:52 PM

JMT_d10513010.dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

202

203

204

205

206

207

208

209

210

211

PC 211+8

2.4

2

212

213 214

215

216

0

SCALE

50' 100'

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 2

02

+00 S

EE

SH

EE

T 9

10

10

C5

C5

I-495 SOUTHBOUND I-495 NORTHBOUND BL

I-495 NORTHBOUND

GE

OR

GE

WASHIN

GTON

ME

MORIA

L PAR

KW

AY

PC =

PT =

STA. 211+82.42

END PROJECT 0495-029-123 P101,C501

270287

298

UNDERDRAIN UD-4

LEGEND

Denotes Proposed Pavement

Denotes Resurfacing of Pavement

Denotes Demolition of Pavement

and Joint Repair Number

Denotes Full Depth Patch/Joint Repair Location# E = MATCH EXISTING

V = 70 MPH

150' MIN.

SEE NOTE 4

EN

D

PA

V'T

TIE-I

N

BE

GIN P

AV'T

TIE-I

N

Curve NBB005

PI = 221+05.40

T = 922.98'

L = 1,724.11'

R = 1,950.00'

211+82.42

229+06.54

BE

GIN P

AV'T

TIE-I

N

EN

D

PA

V'T

TIE-I

N

150' MIN.SEE NOTE 4

APPROVED BY VDOT (SEE SPECIAL PROVISION).

5. MOVABLE MEDIAN BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED AT A LOCATION

SHEET 2A(2).

4. FOR TRANSVERSE PAVEMENT TIE-IN DETAIL SEE TYPICAL SECTION

FROM SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY.

3. THE GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY BRIDGE IS SHOWN

FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.

2. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN 2005 AND IS SHOWN

TO MILLING AND OVERLAY.

1. FULL DEPTH PATCHES/JOINT REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR

NOTES:

BARRIER MODIFICATION DETAIL 2-A BIFURCATED 3" TO 9"BARRIER MODIFICATION DETAIL 2-A BIFURCATED 9" TO 18"

Page 67: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_t105130_12(0).dgn

Plotted By: nelson10:44:19 AM

JMT_t105130_12(0).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

12(0)

12(0)

4 - #4 Cables

1 - 2" Conduit (Power)

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

2 - #4 Cables

1 - 2" Conduit (Power)

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

2-#4 Cables

1 - 2" Conduit (Power)

4 - #4 Cables

1 - 2" Conduit (Power)

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

BORED CONDUIT

6 - #4 Cables

1 - 2" Conduit (Power)

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

2 - #4 Cables

1 - 2" Conduit (Power)

Bored Conduit

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - CCTV Cable

1 - DMS Cable

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

Bored Conduit

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - LCS Cable

2 - CCTV Cables

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

Bored Conduit

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

2 - CCTV Cables

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

Bored Conduit

8 - #4 Cables

1 - 2" Conduit (Power)

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - LCS Cable

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

Bored Conduit

4 - #4 Cables

1 - 2" Conduit (Power)

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - LCS Cable

2 - CCTV Cables

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - CCTV Cable

1 - DMS Cable

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

All conduit shall be trenched unless otherwise noted.

1 - CCTV Cable

2 - 1 ‚" Metal Conduit (ITS)

Mounted on Structure

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - LCS Cable

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

2 - CCTV Cables

2 - 1 ‚" Metal Conduit (ITS)

Mounted on Structure

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - LCS Cable

2 - CCTV Cables

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

1 - 2" Conduit (Power - Empty)

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - Radar Detector Cable

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

4 - #4 Cables

1 - 2" Conduit

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - Radar Detector Cable

2 - CCTV Cables

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

2 - #4 Cables

1 - 2" Conduit (Power)

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

Bored Conduit

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

2 - CCTV Cables

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

2 - #4 Cables

1 - 1 •" Metal Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - 1 ‚" Metal Conduit (Empty)

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1 ‚" Metal Conduit (ITS)

Mounted on Structure

CONDUIT AND CABLE SCHEDULE

3

J

JC

#4 Conductor

2" Conduit

2 -

1 -

JB-S2

JB-S3

Cabinet and Conduit Detail

N.T.S.

To Power Source#4 Conductor

2" Conduit

2 -

1 -

A

B

C

D

E

G

Device Cables as Required

1 - 1-1#4" Conduit

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1-‚" Conduit

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1-1#4" Conduit

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1-‚" Conduit

Device Cables

2 - 12 Strand SMF

2 - 2" Conduit

cabinets on a modified CF-3 foundation.

All new cabinet installations shall consist of two

F

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

R

S

T

U

W

X

Y

Page 68: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_t105130_12(0A).dgn

Plotted By: nelson10:44:32 AM

JMT_t105130_12(0A).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

12(0A)

12(0A)

SIGN/ITS NOTES:

All conduit shall be trenched unless otherwise noted.

8 - #4 Cables

1 - 2" Conduit (Power)

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

2 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

2 - #4 Cables

1 - 2" Conduit (Power)

1 - CCTV Cable

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

1 - 12 Strand SMF

Empty Existing Conduit

8 - #4 Cables

1 - 2" Conduit (Power)

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

Bored Conduit

4 - #4 Cables

1 - 2" Conduit (Power)

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - LCS Cable

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

1 - CCTV Cables

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

4 - #4 Cables

1 - 2" Conduit (Power)

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - CCTV Cable

1 - DMS Cable

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

1 - 1 ‚" Metal Conduit (Empty)

2 - CCTV Cables

1 - 1 ‚" Metal Conduit (ITS)

Mounted on Structure

2 - #4 Cables

1 - 2" Conduit (Power)

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

2 - CCTV Cables

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

2 - #4 Cables

1 - 2" Conduit (Power)

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - DMS Cable

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

Bored Conduit

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - CCTV Cable

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

1 - 12 Strand SMF

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

2 - #4 Cables

1 - 2" Conduit (Power)

1 - Tone Wire

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS Spare)

1 - DMS Cable

2 - CCTV Cables

1 - 1 ‚" Conduit (ITS)

CONDUIT AND CABLE SCHEDULE

AA

BB

CC

DD

EE

FF

GG

HH

II

JJ

KK

LL

Z

Page 69: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

PROPOSED EXISTING

PLAN SYMBOL

CCTV CAMERA SITE

ITS LEGEND

OR VDOT OWNED)

TRAFFIC DETECTOR SITE (EXPRESS LANESE V

MONITORING SYSTEMFIXED CCTV CAMERA FOR SHOULDER LANE

E

E

3 CJ

C

E

E

3 CJ

C

SE-5

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_t105130_12(1).dgn

Plotted By: nelson10:45:12 AM

JMT_t105130_12(1).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

0

SCALE

50' 100'

12(1)

12(1)

(1) PTZ ON CELLULAR TOWER

CCTV-1045:

PROPOSED EXISTING

Proposed Sign Panel

Existing Sign to Remain or to be Relocated 95

I NTERSTATE

95

I NTERSTATE

95

I NTERSTATE

Existing Sign to be Removed

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

SE

E

SH

EE

T 12(2)

SIGNS SUPPORTS

SIGN & ITS SUPPORT LEGEND

SYMBOL

Single Post Sign/ITS Support

Double Post Sign/ITS Support

O/H Cantilever Sign/ITS Support

O/H Span Sign/ITS Support

O/H Butterfly Sign/ITS Support

SIGN/ITS NOTES:

AND DO NOT GUARANTEE ANY LEVEL OF COVERAGE.

CAMERA LOCATIONS AND QUANTITY SHOWN ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY

REQUIREMENTS OF THE RFP AND SPECIFICATIONS. SLMS CCTV

ENSURE THAT THE COVERAGE AND DETECTION MEETS THE

LOCATIONS OF THE FIXED CCTV CAMERAS FOR THE SLMS TO

THE DESIGN BUILDER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE

SHOULDER LANE TAPER AT THE NORTH END OF THE PROJECT).

THE SOUTH END OF THE PROJECT TO THE END OF THE

OF THE SHOULDER USE LANE (FROM THE THEORETICAL GORE AT

FOR OBSTRUCTION AND INCIDENT DETECTION ALONG THE LENGTH

3. A SHOULDER LANE MONITORING SYSTEM (SLMS) SHALL BE PROVIDED

ANY LEVEL OF COVERAGE.

LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY AND DO NOT GUARANTEE

PROJECT LIMITS DURING ALL SEASONAL CONDITIONS. CCTV CAMERA

AND ALL LANE USE CONTROL SIGNALS AND DMSs WITHIN THE

CCTV CAMERA VIEWING COVERAGE OF I-495 NB AND SB TRAFFIC

2. THE DESIGN BUILDER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING 100%

SIGNING AND ITS REQUIREMENTS.

INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS (PART 2 OF THE RFP) FOR ALL

THE DESIGN-BUILDER SHALL REFER TO THE RFP TECHNICAL

1. PROPOSED SIGN/ITS STRUCTURES AND LOCATIONS ARE CONCEPTUAL.

Proposed Shoulder Lane Control Signal (LCS)

CONNECT FIBER TO EXISTING ETHERNET SWITCH.

CONNECT PROPOSED CONDUIT TO EXISTING CABINET.

- (2) DETECTORS

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR (EXPRESS LANES) - OL:

EXISTING TO REMAIN

- (1) FIXED (POINTING SOUTH - HOT)

- (2) FIXED (POINTING SOUTH - GP)

- (1) FIXED (POINTING NORTH)

- (1) PTZ

CCTV - 1059 (EXPRESS LANES):

EXISTING TO REMAIN

- (1) DETECTOR

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR (EXPRESS LANES) - IL:

EXISTING TO REMAIN

CONTROL PLANSSIGNING AND ITS COMMUNICATION

3 J

J

C

LE

WIN

SVIL

LE

RD

(Rte. 6

94)

TYP

E 1 D

MS

OUTER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

OUTER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 EXPRESS (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 EXPRESS (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

SIG

N S

TR

UC

TU

RE

NO: O

H-1

R

3 J

C

Page 70: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

PC 10

0+0

0.0

0

100

101

102

103

104E

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_t105130_12(2).dgn

Plotted By: nelson10:45:47 AM

JMT_t105130_12(2).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

0

SCALE

50' 100'

12(2)

12(2)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

SE

E

SH

EE

T 12(1)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 114

+50 S

EE

SH

EE

T 12(3)

- (2) DETECTORS

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR (EXPRESS LANES) - IL:

CONTROL PLANSSIGNING AND ITS COMMUNICATION

J

J

J

OUTER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

OVE

RL

AY

SIG

N P

AN

EL

SIG

N S

TR

UC

TU

RE

NO: C

-1

G D A

R

3

J

C

Page 71: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

279. 10' Rt.

+11. 33

MONF 235. 97' Rt.

+64. 66

MONF

Soundwall

Face Of

Soundwall

Face OfExist. R/W & L/A Line

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

S. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

N. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per V

DOT Highw

ay Plan 0

413-029-007, R

W-2

Exist. R

/W

& L/

A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2Exist. R/W & L/A Line

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

PT 117

+82.3

1

118

119

E

TT

TCTC

TC

Elec.

HH

Lig

ht

Pole

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

Cab.

Traf.

Cab.

F. O.

MH

F. O.

MH

3 C C3

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_t105130_12(3).dgn

Plotted By: nelson10:46:23 AM

JMT_t105130_12(3).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

0

SCALE

50' 100'

12(3)

12(3)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 119

+00 S

EE

SH

EE

T 12(4)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 114

+50 S

EE

SH

EE

T 12(3)

FIXED CCTV CAMERA FOR SLMS

EXISTING ETHERNET SWITCH

CONNECT FIBER TO

TO EXISTING CABINET

CONNECT CONDUIT

CONTROL PLANSSIGNING AND ITS COMMUNICATION

J

J

J

J

J

(SH

OU

LD

ER

CL

OS

ED)

ME

SS

AG

E 1

(SH

OU

LD

ER

OP

EN)

ME

SS

AG

E 2

OUTER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

(2) T

YP

E 3

DM

S

SIG

N S

TR

UC

TU

RE

NO: C

-2

SIG

N S

TR

UC

TU

RE

NO: C

-3

AF

BB

UK

H

AA

3

J

J J

J

C

Page 72: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

78. 12' Lt.+58. 22IPF

77. 93.' Lt.+55. 43MONF

212. 35' Rt.

+8. 54

MONF

233. 69' Rt.

+89. 75

MONF

439. 36' Rt.+3. 20

MONF

Conc. Ditch

SoundwallFace Of

SoundwallFace Of

SoundwallFace Of

Per V

DOT

Highw

ay

Plan 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. R/

W

& L/

A Line

Per VDOT Hi

ghway Plan

0413-029-00

7, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A

Line

Per V

DOT Highw

ay Plan 0

413-029-007, R

W-2

Exist. R

/W

& L/

A Line

Per

VDOT Highw

ay Plan

0413-029-007, R

W-2

Exist.

R/W

& L/

A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

119 12

0 121 122 123

PC 12

3+2

6.3

3

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

S

TCTC

TC

S

EOI

EOI

EOI

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

E

3 C

3 C

C

J

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_t105130_12(4).dgn

Plotted By: nelson10:46:59 AM

JMT_t105130_12(4).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

0

SCALE

50' 100'12(4)

12(4)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 119

+00 S

EE

SH

EE

T 12(3)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 132

+50 S

EE

SH

EE

T 12(5)

PROPOSED CCTV-1

- (1) DETECTOR

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR (EXPRESS LANES):

FIXED CCTV CAMERA FOR SLMSFIXED CCTV CAMERAS FOR SLMS

REMOVE EXISTING SIGN AND LIGHTING

CONNECT FIBER TO EXISTING ETHERNET SWITCH.

CONNECT CONDUIT TO EXISTING CABINET.

SIG

N S

TR

UC

TU

RE

NO: C

-4

SIG

N S

TR

UC

TU

RE

NO: C

-6

EXIS

TIN

G SIG

N

LIG

HTIN

G S

OU

RC

EC

ON

NE

CT

NE

W

SIG

N

LIG

HTIN

G

TO

SIG

N S

TR

UC

TU

RE

NO: C

-5

- (1) PTZ ON CELLULAR TOWER

CCTV - 1050:

EXISTING TO REMAIN

- (1) FIXED (POINTING SOUTH)

- (1) FIXED (POINTING NORTH)

- (1) PTZ

CCTV - 1061 (EXPRESS LANES):

EXISTING TO REMAIN

CONTROL PLANSSIGNING AND ITS COMMUNICATION

J

J

J

J

J

SE-9A

OL

D

DO

MINIO

N

DR

(Rte. 7

38)

OUTER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

AA N

L

W

AA

CC

M

D

W

ADD

I

A

3

3

3 J

J

J

J

C

C

C

Page 73: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

74. 50' Lt.

+97. 26

IPF

74. 56' Lt.

+87. 81

MONF

230. 31' Rt.

+41. 90

IPF223. 98' Rt.+7. 74

IPF

(Variable Width R. O. W.)S. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

(Variable Width R. O. W.)N. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

Per VDOT Highway Plan

0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A L

ine

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

133 13

4 135

136

137

138

139

140

PT 14

0+3

0.8

7

141

142

143

144

145

146

TC

TC

S

S

TC

TC

TC

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

F. O.

MH

Elec. J. B.

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_t105130_12(5).dgn

Plotted By: nelson10:47:36 AM

JMT_t105130_12(5).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

0

SCALE

50' 100'

12(5)

12(5)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 146+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 12(6)

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS FOR SLMS

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS FOR SLMS

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 132

+50 S

EE

SH

EE

T 12(4)

NO: C

-7

ST

RU

CT

UR

E

SIG

N

CONTROL PLANSSIGNING AND ITS COMMUNICATION

J

J

J

J

J

OUTER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

A

A

O

N

L

B

3

J

J

J

C

Page 74: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

60. 24' Lt.+51. 57MONF

427. 00' Rt.+58. 41IPF

461. 89' Rt.+27. 19IPF

243. 84 Rt.+84. 347MONF237. 02' Rt.

+61. 02

IPF

244. 30' Rt.+94. 95MONF

Soundwall

Face Of

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per V

DOT High

way Plan 0

413-02

9-007, R

W-2

Exist. R/W

& L/

A Lin

e

Per V

DOT

Hig

hway P

lan 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. R

/W

& L/

A Line

Per VDOT

Highwa

y Plan

0413-02

9-007, R

W-2

Exist.

L/A Lin

e

Per VDOT

Highway

Plan 041

3-029-00

7, RW-2

Exist. R/

W

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. L/A Line

146

147

148

PC 14

8+7

1.61

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156 157 15

8 159 16

0

E

E

TC

TC

T

TC

T

w/

F. O.

Cab.

Power Pole

Traf.

Cab.

Elec.

HH

Traf.

HH

F. O.

HH

TC

V

J

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_t105130_12(6).dgn

Plotted By: nelson10:48:13 AM

JMT_t105130_12(6).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

0

SCALE

50' 100'

12(6)

12(6)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 146+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 12(5)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 160+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 12(7)

PROPOSED CCTV-2

FOR SLMS

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS

FOR SLMS

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS

FOR SLMS

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS

REMOVE EXISTING SIGN

FIBER CONNECTION.

HARDWIRED POWER AND PROVIDE

- REPLACE SOLAR POWER WITH

- (1) DETECTOR

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2506 IL:

CABINET TO NEW CABINET

FIBER FROM EXISTING DETECTOR

FIBER OPTIC JUNCTION BOX. REROUTE

TIE PROPOSED CONDUIT INTO EXISTING

WITH NEW CABINET

REPLACE EXISTING CABINET

SIG

N S

TR

UC

TU

RE

NO: C

-9

SIG

N S

TR

UC

TU

RE

NO: C

-8

SIG

N S

TR

UC

TU

RE

NO: E

X-5

CONTROL PLANSSIGNING AND ITS COMMUNICATION

EXISTING EMPTY CONDUIT

PROPOSED FIBER IN

J

J

J

J

J

J

OUTER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

M

B

W

I

W

GG

R B

EE

P

A E

AS

A

I

I

3

3

3

3

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

C

C

C

C

Page 75: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

151. 85' Lt.+33. 06MONF

204. 29' Lt.+51. 27MONF200. 45' Lt.

+91. 06

MONF

Soundwall

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

S. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

N. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0

413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Li

ne

Per VDOT H

ighway P

lan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. L/A Line

Per V

DO

T

Hig

hway Pla

n 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. L

/A

Lin

e

Per V

DOT

Hig

hway Pla

n 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist.

R/

W

Per VDOT

Highway

Plan 041

3-029-00

7, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L

/A Line

Per VDOT Highway P

lan 0413-029-

007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A

Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per V

DOT

Highw

ay Plan 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. R

/W

& L/

A Line

Per V

DOT Highw

ay Plan

0413-029-007, R

W-2

Exist. R/

W

& L/

A Line

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170 171

PT 17

1+54.6

6

172 17

3 174

E

E

E

E

E

E

E

T

TC

E

TC

Traf.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

Cab.

Elec.

HH

Elec.

Box

Traf. Sig

nal

Elec.

HH

Hydrant

EOI

EOI

EOI

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Traf.

Cab.

Utility Pole

EOI

w/

Traf.

Cab.

Utility Pole

F. O.

HH

F. O.

Wit. Post

F. O.

Wit. Post

F. O.

HH

F. O.

HH

F. O.

HH

F. O.

Wit. Post

V

V

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_t105130_12(7).dgn

Plotted By: nelson10:48:47 AM

JMT_t105130_12(7).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

0

SCALE

50' 100'

12(7)

12(7)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 160+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 12(6)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 174+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 12(8)

PROPOSED CCTV-3

FOR SLMS

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS

REMOVE EXISTING SIGN AND LIGHTING

- (1) DETECTOR

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2503 OL:

EXISTING TO REMAIN

TO

EXIS

TIN

G

LIG

HTIN

G S

OU

RC

E

CO

NN

EC

T

NE

W

SIG

N

LIG

HTIN

G

SIG

N S

TR

UC

TU

RE

NO: C

-11

- (2) DETECTORS

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2504 IL, IDS 2505 IL:

EXISTING TO REMAIN

- (1) PTZ ON CELLULAR TOWER

CCTV - 1055:

EXISTING TO REMAIN

NO: C

-12

ST

RU

CT

UR

E

SIG

N

CONTROL PLANSSIGNING AND ITS COMMUNICATION

J

J

J

J

J

SE-9A

GE

OR

GE

TO

WN PIK

E(Rte. 193)

OUTER LOOPINTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

SIG

N S

TR

UC

TU

RE

NO: C

-10

A

II A

L

K

K

P

I

KHH

KJJ

3

3

3

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

C

CC

Page 76: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

47. 12'

Lt.+65. 34

MONF

56. 70'

Lt.+83. 51

MONF

258. 26' Rt.+26

. 35IPF

460. 01' Rt.

+99. 41

MONF

Conc. Ditch

Conc.

Ditch

Conc. Ditch

Soundwall

Soundwall

Soundwall

Soundwall

Face Of

Per VDOT

Highwa

y Plan

0413-0

29-007, RW-2

Exist. R/

W & L/A

Line

Per VDOT

Highway

Plan 041

3-029-00

7, RW-2

Exist. R/

W & L/A Li

ne

Per V

DOT High

way Plan 0

413-02

9-007, RW-2

Exist. L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. L/A Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A Line The

Limited

Access Line In T

his

Area.

Unclear

As T

o The

Locatio

n Of

The

Existin

g Hi

ghwa

y Plans

Are

Per

VDOT Highw

ay Plan

0413-029-007, R

W-2

Exist. R/W

Line

Per VDOT

Highway Pla

n 0413-

029-007

, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L

/A Line

174

175

176

177

178

PC 17

8+4

8.5

4

179

180 18

1 182

183

184

185

186

187

188

EE

V

F. O.

HH

F. O.

Wit. Post

F. O.

Wit. Post

EOI

F. O.

Wit. Post

F. O.

HH

F. O.

HH

Catv Ped.

Utility Pole

F. O. Ped.

Elec.

Meter

Elec. S

witch

(DA

TU

R)

(DA

TU

R)

(DATUR)

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_t105130_12(8).dgn

Plotted By: nelson10:49:24 AM

JMT_t105130_12(8).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

0

SCALE

50' 100'

12(8)

12(8)

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 167+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 12(7)

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 188+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 12(9)

PROPOSED CCTV-4

FIXED CCTV CAMERA FOR SLMS

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS FOR SLMSFIXED CCTV CAMERAS FOR SLMS

SIGN AND LIGHTING

REMOVE EXISTING

CONTROL PLANSSIGNING AND ITS COMMUNICATION

J

J

J

LIV

E

OA

K

DR

(SH

OU

LD

ER

CL

OS

ED)

ME

SS

AG

E 1

(SH

OU

LD

ER

OP

EN)

ME

SS

AG

E 2

TYP

E 2

DM

S

OUTER LOOPINTERSTATE 495

(CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL B

ELTWAY) NBL

B-2

SIG

N S

TR

UC

TU

RE

NO: C-13

SIG

N S

TR

UC

TU

RE

NO: C

-14

LIG

HTIN

G S

OU

RC

E

LIG

HTIN

G

TO

EXIS

TIN

G

CO

NN

EC

T

NE

W

SIG

N

K

S

X

I

A

T

J

A

KK

H

A

3

3

3

3

3

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

C

C C

C

C

Page 77: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

286. 91' Lt.

+8. 52

MONF

116. 73' Lt.

+23. 49

IPF

261. 52' Rt.+68.

24MONF

259. 87' Rt.

+41. 94

MONF

Conc. Ditch

Conc. Ditch

Sou

ndwall

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

S. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

(Variable Width R. O. W.)

N. B. L.

Interstate 495, Capital Beltway

Per V

DOT

Hig

hway

Plan 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. R/

W

Line

Per VDOT

Highway Pla

n 0413-

029-007

, RW-2

Exist.

L/A Lin

e Per VDOT H

ighway Plan

0413-029-0

07, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/A

Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2Exist. R/W & L/A Line

Per VDOT H

ighway Pla

n 0413-029

-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W & L/

A Line

188

189

190 19

1 192

PT 19

2+8

7.7

0

193

194

195

196

197

198

199

200

201

202

E

E

E

TC

TC

TCTC

TC

TC

TC

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Traf.

HH

Lig

ht

Pole

Elec.

Cab.

F. O.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

Cab.

(DATUR)

(DA

TU

R)

(DA

TU

R)

V

V

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_t105130_12(9).dgn

Plotted By: nelson10:50:00 AM

JMT_t105130_12(9).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

0

SCALE

50' 100'

12(9)

12(9)

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 188+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 12(8)

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 2

02

+00 S

EE

SH

EE

T 12(10)

PROPOSED CCTV-5

(SEE SHEET NO. 12(10))

TO GEORGE WASHINGTON PARKWAY

BETWEEN I-495 NORTHBOUND AND RAMP

- RELOCATE DETECTOR TO GORE AREA

STRUCTURE

- (1) DETECTOR ON EXISTING OVERHEAD SIGN

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2523 NB:

FOR SLMS

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS

FOR SLMS

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS

FOR SLMS

FIXED CCTV CAMERAS

CONTROL PLANSSIGNING AND ITS COMMUNICATION

POWER AND PROVIDE FIBER CONNECTION.

- REPLACE SOLAR POWER WITH HARDWIRED

- (2) DETECTORS

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2501 SB, IDS 2502 SB:

EXISTING TO REMAINREROUTE EXISTING FIBER TO NEW CABINET.

TIE CONDUIT TO EXISTING JUNCTION BOX.

ELEC. JUNCTION BOX.

TIE CONDUIT TO EXISTING

IN EXISTING CONDUIT

PROP. 12-STRAND SMF

J

J

J

OUTER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

TYP

E 1 D

MS

SIG

N S

TR

UC

TU

RE

NO: O

H-2

FF

B

Z

LL

EE

Y

J

J

3

3

3

J

J

J

J

J

J J

C

C

C

Page 78: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

291. 87' Rt.

+34. 42

MONF

423. 86' Rt.

+80. 38

MONF

Conc.

Ditch

Conc. DitchConc. Ditch

Conc. D

itch

Conc. DitchConc. Ditch

Soundwall

Soundwall

Face Of

202

203

204

205

206

207

208

209

210

211

PC 211+8

2.4

2

212

213 214

215

216

E

E

E

E E

E

E

E

E

E

T

EE

Elec.

HH

F. O.

HH

F. O.

HH

Elec.

HH

F. O.

HH

Elec.

HH

F. O.

HH

F. O.

HH

F. O.

Wit. Post

F. O.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

Meter

Elec.

HH

Tele.

HH

Elec.

HH

E

Elec.

HH

F. O.

HH

(DA

TU

R)

(DA

TU

R)

V

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_t105130_12(10).dgn

Plotted By: nelson10:50:39 AM

JMT_t105130_12(10).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

0

SCALE

50' 100'

12(10)

12(10)

AND PROVIDE FIBER CONNECTION.

- REPLACE SOLAR POWER WITH HARDWIRED POWER

SIGN STRUCTURE (SEE SHEET NO. 12(9))

- (1) DETECTOR RELOCATED FROM OVERHEAD

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2523 NB:

MA

TC

H

LIN

E

ST

A. 2

02

+00 S

EE

SH

EE

T 12(9)

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 2

16+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 12(11)

CELLULAR TOWER

(1) PTZ ON

CCTV - 1060:

BOX. REROUTE FIBER TO NEW CABINET.

TIE CONDUIT TO EXISTING JUNCTION

CONTROL PLANSSIGNING AND ITS COMMUNICATION

IN EXISTING EMPTY CONDUIT

PROP. 12-STRAND SMF

IN EXISTING EMPTY CONDUIT

PROP. 12-STRAND SMF

CELLULAR TOWER

- (1) PTZ ON

CCTV - 1070:

EXISTING TO REMAIN

JJ

SE-9

A

GE

OR

GE

WASHIN

GTON

ME

MORIA

L PK

WY

(Rte. 9

0005)

OUTER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

R

DD

GE

OR

GE

WAS

HIN

GT

ON

ME

MORIA

L PAR

KW

AY

3

C

Page 79: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

266. 85' Rt.

+42. 58

(U.S.G.S.)

MONF232. 08

' Rt.+67. 77(U.S.G.S

.)MONF

201. 71' Rt.

+81. 84IPF

215. 75' Rt.

+90. 63MONFConc. Ditch

Conc. Ditc

h

Conc.

Ditch

Conc. Ditch

Conc. Ditch

Conc. Ditch

SoundwallFace Of

(Variable Width R. O

. W.)S. B. L.Interstate

495, Capital Beltway

(Variable Width R. O

. W.)N. B. L.Interstate

495, Capital Beltway

Per VDOT H

ighway P

lan 0413-0

29-007, R

W-2

Exist. R/

W & L/A Li

ne

Per VDOT

Highwa

y Plan

0413-0

29-007, RW-2

Exist.

R/W & L/A

Line

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. L/A Line

Per VDOT

Highwa

y Plan

0413-0

29-007, RW-2

Exist.

L/A Lin

e

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W Line

Per V

DO

T

Hig

hway Pla

n 0413-0

29-0

07, R

W-2

Exist. L

/A

Lin

e

Per VDOT Highway Plan 0413-029-007, RW-2

Exist. R/W Line

216

217

218

219

220

221

222

223

224

225

226 227 2

28

229

PT 229+0

6.5

4

E

E

E

T

TC

TC

T

TV

Elec.

HH

Traf.

HH

Elec.

HH

Elec.

HH

TV

CA

TV

MH

F. O.

Wit. Post

Traf.

HH

Traf.

Cab.

TC

EOI

CA

TV

MH

F. O.

Wit. Post

V

V

Cell Revised 12/11/12

VA.

STATE

ROUTE PROJECT

VA.

REVISEDSTATE

STATE

ROUTE PROJECTSHEET NO.

JMT_t105130_12(11).dgn

Plotted By: nelson10:51:17 AM

JMT_t105130_12(11).dgn

PROJECT MANAGER

PROJECT SHEET NO.

DESIGN FEATURES RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION

OR TO REGULATION AND CONTROL OF TRAFFIC

MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DEEMED

NECESSARY BY THE DEPARTMENT

SURVEYED BY, DATE

DESIGN BY

GENERAL NOTES

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

Whitman Requardt & Associates (703) 293-9717

0495-029-123

0495-029-123

C501495

VDOT

Paul Nishimoto (571) 483-2622

MARCH 12, 2014

CONCEPT PLANS

Johnson, Mirmiran and Thompson 703-464-7369

0

SCALE

50' 100'12(11)

12(11)

MAT

CH

LIN

E

ST

A. 2

16+0

0 S

EE

SH

EE

T 12(10)

PROPOSED CCTV-6

CONTROL PLANSSIGNING AND ITS COMMUNICATION

FIBER CONNECTION.

HARDWIRED POWER AND PROVIDE

- REPLACE SOLAR POWER WITH

STRUCTURE

- (1) DETECTOR ON EXISTING OVERHEAD SIGN

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2520 OL:

EXISTING TO REMAIN

FIBER CONNECTION.

HARDWIRED POWER AND PROVIDE

- REPLACE SOLAR POWER WITH

STRUCTURE

- (1) DETECTOR ON EXISTING OVERHEAD SIGN

RADAR TRAFFIC DETECTOR - IDS 2500 IL:

EXISTING TO REMAIN

IN EXISTING EMPTY CONDUIT

PROP. 12-STRAND SMF

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

J

OUTER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) SBL

INNER LOOP

INTERSTATE 495 (CAPITAL BELTWAY) NBL

D

G

D

R

M

C

R

3

3

J

J

C

C

Page 80: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Written Statement Fully Complaint with RFP

Attachment 4.2.8

4.2.8 Written Statem

ent Fully Com

plaint with RFP

Page 81: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

4.2.8 Written Statement Northern Section Shoulder Use

A Design-Build Project

State Project No: (FO) 0495-029-123, P101, C501 / Contract ID No: C001005130DB72

Design Criteria Table and Limits of Construction The F.O. Day/JMT Team’s proposal is fully compliant with the Design Criteria Table included in the RFP Technical Requirements (Part 2) as Attachments 2.2 (shown below) and all other requirements of this RFP, Addendum #1 and Questions & Answers.

We also certify that the proposed limits of construction including all stormwater management facilities are located within the right-of-way limits shown on the RFP/Addendum #1 Conceptual Plans with the exception of permanent and temporary easements. The F.O. Day/JMT Team design concept does not require Design Exception and/or Design Waivers unless they are identified or included in the RFP or Addendum.

Page 82: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Francis O. Day Company, Inc.850 East Gude Dr., Suite ARockville, MD 20850 P. 301.652.2400F. 302.424.3697www.foday.com

Page 83: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

4.3 Price ProPosal

state Project No.: (Fo) 0495-029-123, P101, c501Federal Project No.: sTP-495-5(094)contract iD No.: c00105130DB72

March 14, 2014

From: south of old Dominion overpass To: George Washington Memorial Parkway

I-495 NortherNSectIoN Shoulder uSeFaIrFax couNty, Va a Design-Build Project

BEGIN PROJECT

END PROJECT

Live Oak Overpass

Georgetown Pike Ramps

Old Dominion Overpass

GWMP Trumpet

Page 84: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

1 of 1

ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.2

DESIGN-BUILD PRICE PROPOSAL CHECKLIST

Project Name: I-495 Northern Section Shoulder Use

in Fairfax County, Virginia Contract ID Number: C00105130DB72

Contents of Price Proposal:

Proposal Price, in both numbers and words (Attachment 4.3.1)

Schedule of Items itemized in accordance with Part 1, Section 4.4.6, including material quantities and costs of each proposed work package

Proposed Monthly Payment Schedule showing the anticipated schedule on which funds will be required and associated value of work in accordance with Part 1, Section 4.4.7

Price Adjustment Information and Forms for Fuel, Asphalt and Steel, including identification of pay items and associated quantities eligible for adjustment (Part 3, Section 6.3, Attachments 6.3)

Proposal Guaranty (C-24) required by Section 102.07 of Part 5, Division I Amendments to the Standard Specifications

Sworn Statement Forms (C-104, C-105, Attachments 4.3.4(a) and

4.3.4(b))

DBE Requirements Forms (C-111, C-49 and C-112) as applicable (Attachments 4.3.5(a), 4.3.5(b) and 4.3.5(c))

CD-ROM containing the entire Price Proposal in a single cohesive

Adobe PDF file

friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
X
friedman
Typewritten Text
X
friedman
Typewritten Text
X
friedman
Typewritten Text
X
friedman
Typewritten Text
X
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
X
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
X
friedman
Typewritten Text
X
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
friedman
Typewritten Text
Page 85: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Cost Breakdown Summary4.3.1

4.3.1 Cost Breakdown Sum

mary

Page 86: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 87: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Adjustments to Asphalt, Fuel and Steel Prices

4.3.2

4.3.2 Adjustments to

Asphalt, Fuel and Steel Prices

Page 88: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 89: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 90: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 91: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 92: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 93: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 94: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 95: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 96: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 97: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 98: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 99: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 100: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 101: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 102: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 103: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Proposal Guaranty 4.3.3 4.3.3

Proposal Guaranty

Page 104: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 105: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 106: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Sworn Statement Forms 4.3.4

4.3.4 Sworn Statem

ent Forms

Page 107: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 108: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 109: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 110: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

DBE Requirement Forms4.3.5

4.3.5 DBE Requirem

ent Forms

Page 111: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 112: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 113: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 114: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 115: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 116: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 117: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 118: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 119: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 120: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 121: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 122: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 123: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 124: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 125: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

4.4.6 Schedule of Items

Page 126: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 127: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 128: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 129: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 130: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

4.4.7 Proposed Monthly Payment Schedule

Page 131: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,
Page 132: 4.1 Letter of SubmittaL and 4.2 attachmentS I-495 …...ATTACHMENT 4.0.1.1 Braddock Road (Route 620) and Pleasant Valley Road (Route 609) Intersection Improvement in Fairfax County,

Francis O. Day Company, Inc.850 East Gude Dr., Suite ARockville, MD 20850 P. 301.652.2400F. 302.424.3697www.foday.com