4.1 a microbial eor pilot in the gullfaks field
DESCRIPTION
enhanced oil recoveryTRANSCRIPT
Classification: Internal Status: Draft
A Microbial EOR Pilot in the Gullfaks Field
Rune Instefjord, Ole Tørnqvist and Petter Eltvik
2
Content
• Introduction to the Gullfaks field
• What is MEOR?
• Selection of pilot area
• Equipment
• Implementation of the pilot
• Results
• Conclusions
3
Key data for GF main field
• Discovered: 1978
• Start production: 1986
• STOOIP: 599 MSm³
• Base oil reserves: 358 MSm3
• Produced to date: 336 MSm3
• Daily production: 15 kSm3
• Average water cut: 84 %
• Expected recovery: 60 %
– Recovery pr. 2007: 56%
– Recovery of base res: 94%
• Initial pressure/temperature: 310-320 bar/
71 oC at 1850 m TVD MHN
• Bubble point pressure: ~200-240 bar at
1850 m TVD MHN
• GOR: ~ 100 Sm³/Sm³
• Oil viscosity: ~ 0.5 – 1 cp
4Reservoir Quality
• Reservoirs: Brent, Cook, Statfjord & Lunde
• Very faulted and eroded, with contrasting layers
• Dip up to 12 o in the western part.
• Weak formations
• Porosity (Brent): 30-35 %
• Permeability (Brent): 10 D – 10 mD
5
Drainage strategy
• Aquifer support
• Water injection
• Reservoir pressure over bubble point
• WAG
6
MEOR Principles – reservoir effects
• Cultivate bacteria which lives on the contact (pore scale) between water and oil near the injector.
• The bacteria reduces the surface tension between oil and water and thereby activates oil.
• Already done this process for many years, before start on nitrat injection. (which we have done
for many years due to souring). Drawback: H2S
BACTERIA + OIL + N + P + O2
MOBILISED RESIDUAL OIL ENHANCED SWEEP EFFICIENCY
RED
UC
ED
INTE
RFA
CIA
L
TENSIO
N
RED
UCED
WATER
PERM
EABILITY
7
What is needed for the MEOR pilot
• Nitrate (already injecting du to H2S control).
• Phosphate.
• Air (we remove oxygen from injected seawater due to corrosion of tubing.)
• Equipment :
– Storage tank.
– Chemical pump for nitrate/phosphate.
– Air compressor.
– Air storage.
– Pipes and valves.
Chemical-pump
8
Principle drawing
Water injection-manifold
Well A-41
05-KB01B
42-PF36
42-TB21A
WING
05-KB01A
Water injection-manifold
FE
117
FE
050A
FE
651
14-HV119
14-HV626
FE
050B
P
SUM
Air storage05-XV004 05-FV003
FIC
003
FE
003
PIT
005
PIT
015
Water injection
Chemical injection
Air injection
9
Selection of a good pilot candidate
• An area with steady-state conditions, as little as possible influence from other wells or areas. It is very important to know that the effects we are measuring
is from MEOR and not from ‘something else’.
• The injector should, with advantage, be in the oil zone.
• The distance between injector and producer should not be too long due to
throughput time. To get results in a reasonable time is important.
• The injector should be at a lower level than the producer. If not, the process
will not work.
• Good reservoir understanding.
• The producer(s) should be in steady-state conditions as regards to water cut.
10
G1
G2
G3
G4
G5
G6
H1
H2
H4
H5
H6A
I1
I2A
I2C
I3B
I4I5A
I5B
U1
H3
1
1800
14
1949
3
1949
41792
81936
9
1823
A-1H
1755
A-10
1782
A-11
1925
A-12
1919
A-12(F)
1921
A-12(F)
1965
A-13
1809
A-14
1833
A-15
1965
A-161922
A-16A(F)1945
A-171778
A-17AT21788
A-18(F)2009
A-19
1869
A-19A(F)
1844
A-19A
1830
A-19AT2(F)
1846
A-19AT3
1834
A-19AT3(F)
1844
A-2AH
1753
A-20(F)
1991
A-20A2017
A-221909
A-23
1976
A-24A
1983
A-26
1888
A-3H
1785
A-30(F)1904
A-31
1896
A-32
A-32B
A-33
1880
A-341752
A-34A1752
A-34A(F)
1787
A-34A(F)
1780
A-35
1813
A-36T31745
A-38
1833
A-38(F)
1840 A-39
1765
A-39A(F)
1760
A-39A(F)1765
A-39A
1764
A-39A1761
A-41
1808
A-41A1791
A-41B
1764
A-44T4
1829
A-46T2
1904
A-5H
1810
A-6A
1796
A-7A
1904
A-81875
B-1
2001
B-101773
B-10A1765
B-111822
B-12
2130
B-14A
1964
B-15
1972
B-17
1941
B-191793B-19A
1798
B-19T21799
B-2
1842
B-20
1908
B-211890
B-22(F)
2038
B-22A(F)
2025
B-23
1800
B-24
1886
B-25
1756
B-26
2087
B-271898
B-32001
B-301841
B-31
1790
B-31
1770
B-321795
B-321787
B-33
1838
B-34
1791B-34(F)1766
B-362008
B-36AT2
1993
B-37
1772
B-38
1758
B-41767B-4A(F)
1916
B-4A(F)1979
B-5
1810
B-6(F)
1939
B-7
1774
B-7(F)
1788
B-8
2040
B-9
1996
C-10
1968
C-111791
C-12
1773
C-151818
C-17
2188
C-19(F)2004
C-191971
C-22
1800
C-231938
C-23A
1883
C-251857
C-26
1817
C-27
1835
C-27(F)
1842
C-271860
C-281777
C-3
1817
C-30
1793C-30
1783
C-311986
C-32
1857
C-33
1855
C-35
1767
C-38
1923
1972
C-38(F)
1924
C-38T2
1927
C-5
1761
C-19
1897
A
B
C
0671
1780
1780
1780
1780
00
81
00
81
1800
0081
1820
1820
1820
18
2
0
02
81
04
81
1840
1840
1840
184
0
1840
1840
1840
06
81
1860
1860
1860
1860
06
81
1
860
1880
08
81
1880
08
81
1880
088
1
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1920
1920
1920
1920
02
91
1920
1920
1920
1920
1940
04
91
19
40
04
91
04
91
1940
19
4
0
1940
1940
1
960
1960
1960
1
960
1960
1960
196
0 1960
1980
1980
1980
0891
08
91
1980
1980
1980
1980
08
91
1980
2000
2000
2000
00
02
2000
0002
00
02
2000
2000
2000
00
02
020
2020
020
02
02
2020
2020
2020
2
020
0
40
04
02
04
02
2040
2
0
40
04
02
04
02
60
2060
2060
2060
06
02
08
02
2080
08
02
2080
208
2100
2100
2100
2100
2100
2120
2120
2
12
0
02
12
2140
2140
2140
2160
2160 2160
2160
218
0
0 1 2 km
2600 2620 2640 2660 2680 2700 2720 2740 2760 2780 2800 2820 2840 2860 2880 2900 2920 2940 2960 2980 3000 3020 3040
2200
2220
2240
2260
2280
2300
2320
2340
2360
2380
2400
2420
2440
2460
2480
2500
2520
2540
2560
2580
2600
2620
2640
2660
2680
2700
2720
2740
2760
2780
2800
2820
2840
2860
2880
2900
2920
34/10 Gullfaks
Vann- og Gassflømming i øvre NER
Topp Ness-1 dybdekart
Delvis vann- og gass-flømmet
Usikker vann- og gass-
flømming
Vannflømmet
Oljefylt
Gasskappe
Usikker vannflømming
Usikker
gassflømming
Delvis vannflømmet
Delvis gassflømmet
Prospekt
Oljeprodu
sentVanninjekt
orGassinjekt
orVAG
injektor
Syklisk
prod./gassinj.Mulig
injeksjonMulig
produksjonØOU
mål
A-10A
A-13A-44T4
A-34A
A-39A
A-14
A-11
A-41B
A-36
A-40
B-7A
B-39B
B-25A-12
A-35
PCRI24C.35
B-38
PCRI23
C.28
C.11PCRI35
PCRI37
C.22C.26AT2
IXRI25
PCRI52
C-23CT2
C-25T2
B-36AT2
B-10A
B-19A
B-11
B-24
B-8
PBRH53
PBRH54
PBRH31
PBRH45
PBEG61
PBEG52
C-10
B-14A
PARH13
GFA
I1
Pilot area
GFC
GFB
11
Lower Brent, segment I1:
• Segment I1 is isolated from the rest of lower Brent. May
be an insignificant communication to Cook fm.
• Most shallow part of the field: No OWC established.
• Good reservoir understanding.
• Producers have a stabile production trend over time.
• Well defined water cut in the observation wells.
Status:
– STOOIP=10,4 M Sm³
– 4,10 M Sm³ produced from lower Brent (per 1.12.05).
– Recovery factor of 40% (per 1.12.05), expected recovery factor of 59%.
– Producers: A-36, A-40 and B-39B
– Injector: A-41B
12
Success criteria for the MEOR pilot
• Increased oil recovery (estimated to 35000 Sm³ in A-36).
• Increased pressure drop in the injector A-41B (decreased injectivity)
• Reduced seawater fraction in the producers A-36 and A-40.
• The throughput time for water should be longer.
– Tracer injected before start-up of pilot, Jan-05, gave a throughput time of 5 months. (550m between A-41B and A-36)
• Reduced water cut (at least 5% decrease)
• Reduced H2S in the producer.
A-36
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000ja
n.02
apr.0
2ju
l.02
okt.0
2ja
n.03
apr.0
3ju
l.03
okt.0
3ja
n.04
apr.0
4ju
l.04
okt.0
4ja
n.05
apr.0
5ju
l.05
okt.0
5
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
oil rate month water cut
13
Pilot implementation
• Tracer injected 27.01.05 with a breakthrough time of
5 months. New tracer injected 01.06.06.
• MEOR injection started 05.12.05. Expected pilot
duration of 1 year.
• Design injection rate A-41B: 6000 Sm³/d.
• Status A-36, 01.12.05 :
– Liquid rate / oil rate: ca. 2400 Sm³/d / 100 Sm³/d
– Water cut: 95%
– GOR: 110 - 140 Sm³/Sm³
• Status A-40, 01.12.05 :
– Liquid rate / oil rate: ca. 700 Sm³/d / 130 Sm³/d, restricted by sand
– Water cut: : 80%
– GOR: 80 - 100 Sm³/Sm³
• No effect expected in B-39B.
14
A-41, Injection data during the pilot period
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
01.02.2005 05.06.2005 07.10.2005 08.02.2006 12.06.2006 14.10.2006
I, S
m3
/d/b
ar
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
Inj. r
ate
, S
m3
/d
• The injection rate has been constant between 5000 and 6000 Sm³/d.
• 97% regularities on the injector.
• >90% regularities on the air injection.
• Nitrat/fosfat solvent: 0,107 l/min (independent of rate)
• Air: 98 ltr/min (regulated due to rate).
• Prosper is used to estimate the injectivity of A-41B.
• Well head pressure used in calculations.
• The Injectivity index seems to be rather constant and in the same order of magnitude after the MEOR injection as before.
• The expected reduction in injectivity due to bacterial growth has not been observed.
Water inj rate
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
sep.
03
des.
03
mar
.04
jun.
04
sep.
04
des.
04
mar
.05
jun.
05
sep.
05
des.
05
mar
.06
jun.
06
sep.
06
des.
06
Water inj rate
15
A-36, production data during the pilot period
• The production has been stable at around
100 Sm³/d during the year.
• The water cut has been stable at around 95-
97%.
• The well has rate dependent water cut. High
total rate gives lower water cut.
• The well was restricted by sand and amount
of H2S.
• The seawater fraction has been stable in the
lower edge of 1.
A-36
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
jul. 98 jul. 99 jul. 00 jul. 01 jul. 02 jul. 03 jul. 04 jul. 05 jul. 06 jul. 07
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
SO4 SW AMIOR Vannkutt
A-36
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
des.0
1
mar.
02
jun.0
2
sep.0
2
des.0
2
mar.
03
jun.0
3
sep.0
3
des.0
3
mar.
04
jun.0
4
sep.0
4
des.0
4
mar.
05
jun.0
5
sep.0
5
des.0
5
mar.
06
jun.0
6
sep.0
6
des.0
6
mar.
07
Date
Sm
³/m
nth
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
oil/mnth Wct
16
A-36, production data during the pilot period
• The H2S has stabilised during the period, no
reduction, as expected, is observed.
• In the period from start of planning the pilot to
the implementation, the H2S increased
rapidly.
• This increase gave a new uncertainty to the
pilot. The bacterial growth had been higher
than we first assumed.
• Problems with continuous production from
the well due to high H2S and capacity
restrictions on the platform.
H2S
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
24.07.1998 06.12.1999 19.04.2001 01.09.2002 14.01.2004 28.05.2005 10.10.2006 22.02.2008
A-36 Amiorinjeksjon starter A-40
A-36
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
des.0
1
mar.
02
jun.0
2
sep.0
2
des.0
2
mar.
03
jun.0
3
sep.0
3
des.0
3
mar.
04
jun.0
4
sep.0
4
des.0
4
mar.
05
jun.0
5
sep.0
5
des.0
5
mar.
06
jun.0
6
sep.0
6
des.0
6
mar.
07
Date
Sm
³/m
nth
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
oil/mnth Wct
17
A-40, production data during the pilot period
• The production has been stable at around
200 - 300 Sm³/d during the year.
• Restricted by sand production and closed
down in october-06.
• The water cut has been increasing from 75%
to 90% during the period. The well follows an
usual trend for lower Brent wells.
• The seawater fraction has increased from 70
to 80%, following earlier trend.
• The H2S amount has not been influenced of
the pilot. It is at a much lower level than in A-
36.
H2S
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
24.07.1998 06.12.1999 19.04.2001 01.09.2002 14.01.2004 28.05.2005 10.10.2006 22.02.2008
A-36 Amiorinjeksjon starter A-40
A-40
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
des.0
1
mar.
02
jun.0
2
sep.0
2
des.0
2
mar.
03
jun.0
3
sep.0
3
des.0
3
mar.
04
jun.0
4
sep.0
4
des.0
4
mar.
05
jun.0
5
sep.0
5
des.0
5
mar.
06
jun.0
6
sep.0
6
Date
Sm
³/m
nth
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
oil/mnth wct
18
Results
• No changes in behaviour around the injector A-41B.
• No reduction in either water cut or seawater fraction in the producers A-36 and A-40.
They behave at the same trend as before MEOR injection.
• The tracer injected in June-06 also had a breakthrough time of 5 months.
• Stabilised H2S in A-36 may be due to MEOR.
• The temperature in A-36 has decreased with around 10 degrees during the year,
which means that a lot of water has gone trough the reservoir.
• The oil rate in the producers has not been influenced by the MEOR process.
• No increased oil recovery from the MEOR pilot.
19
Conclusions
• No increased oil recovery from the MEOR pilot.
• Possible explanations:
– Existing bio-film in the injector might have affected the establishment of a new bio-
film needed for the aerobic process. A high level of H2S was present in the area
as a result of long time water flooding. This had possibly reduced oil saturation in the area prior to MEOR pilot due to an anaerobic MEOR process.
– Water flooding in general is very effective on Gullfaks. Due to extensive water flooding, the residual oil saturation could have reached a very low value.
– Due to Etive-Rannoch override effect, the contact between injection water
containing nutrients and oxygen and remaining oil, might have been limited
causing no MEOR effect. The decrease in temperature indicates that the water
only hits a small area.