4 reasons to dump traditional performance management
TRANSCRIPT
insideoutdev.com | 1.888.262.2448
Companies today are no longer defining employee performance simply by annual review numbers. Instead they are revamping their existing performance management process with an emphasis on ongoing, quality conversations between managers and teams.
Performance Management Traditional Reasons to
Highlights of the July 2014 InsideOut Development Survey
HERE’S WHY YOU SHOULD JOIN THEM.
DUMP4
& What to do instead
ONLY 10% of enterprise companies believe that performance management is a GOOD USE OF TIME
The traditional performance management system
DATES BACK TO THE LATE 1800’S
Output used to be the benchmark of performance; TODAY MORE THAN 70% of the U.S. workforce is employed in service or knowledge-related jobs
ONLY 8% of enterprise companies
believe the traditional performance
management process
DRIVES VALUE
10%
A�er companies remove rankings, managers talk to their teams about performance 4 TIMES MORE OFTEN
CONVENTIONAL RATINGS SYSTEMS INHIBIT COLLABORATION,
making a business less customer-focused and agile
of employees who receive the highest scores in a typical performance management system
ARE NOT ACTUALLY THE ORGANIZATION’S HIGHEST PERFORMERS
BY SEPTEMBER 2015,
were moving to a no-ratings system
51 LARGE FIRMS
23
4X
Have all transformed their
performance management models
of respondents to a recent Deloi�e survey said they had RECENTLY CHANGED THEIR
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROCESS or plan to do so within 18 months
Around 70% OF COMPANIES are now reconsidering their performance management
strategy
89%
Learn how coaching conversations can be a catalyst for higher performance in your organization.
CONTACT US TO HAVE A CONVERSATION TODAY.
Sources:Agile Performance Management: HR’s Next Big Move, Human Capital InstituteWhy More and More Companies Are Ditching Performance Ratings, Harvard Business Review, September 8, 2015Reinventing Performance Management, Harvard Business Review, April 2015Global Human Capital Trends 2015: Leading In the New World of Work, Deloitte University Press
1
2
IT’S SO OLD SCHOOL
IT’S A TIME AND RESOURCE BLACK HOLE
2 MILLION
Employees and managers spend around
HOURS A YEAR on performance reviews
Among companies with dynamic evaluation models, 88% OF EMPLOYEES
ARE COMMITTED TO RECURRING
CONVERSATIONS
55% OF EMPLOYEES said their organizations are
commi�ed to having recurring conversations between
managers and employees
The agile model ENCOURAGES A
CULTURE OF COACHING OR
DEVELOPMENT
Year-end ratings are generally less valuable than conversations conducted in the moment about actual performance conversations
“The method that is emerging [in place of traditional performance review models] is more agile and FOCUSES ON GOAL SETTING,
COACHING, AND PROVIDING MORE
CONTINUOUS FEEDBACK.” (Human Capital Institute)
88%
3 SCORES AND RANKINGS DON’T ADD UP
4 IT’S WHAT THE BEST COMPANIES ARE DOING
EXPLORING THE ALTERNATIVE: Agile Performance Management, Including Coaching Conversations