[3em] a general model--based polarimetric decomposition...
TRANSCRIPT
A General Model–Based Polarimetric DecompositionScheme for Vegetated Areas
Maxim Neumann, Laurent Ferro-Famil, Eric Pottier
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Motivation
T = fsTs + fdTd + fvTv
2 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Motivation
T = fsTs + fdTd + fvTv
2 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Volume Component
• Layer of randomly distributed scatterers
• Single particle characteristics:position r uniformorientation ψ orientation distributiontilt Θ
particle scattering anisotropyshape Ξsize Dpermittivity εr
3 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Volume Component
• Layer of randomly distributed scatterers
• Single particle characteristics:position r uniformorientation ψ orientation distributiontilt Θ
particle scattering anisotropyshape Ξsize Dpermittivity εr
3 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Volume Component
• Layer of randomly distributed scatterers
• Single particle characteristics:position r uniformorientation ψ orientation distributiontilt Θ
particle scattering anisotropyshape Ξsize Dpermittivity εr
3 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Volume Component
• Layer of randomly distributed scatterers
• Single particle characteristics:position r uniformorientation ψ orientation distributiontilt Θ
particle scattering anisotropyshape Ξsize Dpermittivity εr
3 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Particle Scattering Anisotropy
Average backscattering matrix in eigenpolarizations:
〈F〉 =
[a 00 b
]=
a + b
2
[1 + δ∗ 0
0 1− δ∗]
Particle scattering anisotropy:
δ =
(a− b
a + b
)∗Depends on: shape, size, permittivity, tilt angle
4 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Particle Scattering AnisotropyParticle scattering anisotropy:
δ =
(a− b
a + b
)∗Effective particle shapes:
• |δ| → 0 =⇒ sphere, disk
• |δ| → 1 =⇒ dipole
Directly related to
• Alpha angle α ∈ [0, 14π] (Cloude and Pottier, 1997):
|δ| = tanα
• Shape parameter ρ ∈ [ 13 , 1] (Freeman, 2007):
|δ| = 21− ρ1 + ρ
4 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Orientation Distribution
• Mean particle polarization orientation: ψ̃
• Degree of orientation randomness: τ ∈ [0, 1]
• τ → 0 =⇒ aligned (no randomness)
• τ → 1 =⇒ complete random orientations
5 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Orientation DistributionCentral limit theorem =⇒Unimodal circular normal von Mises distribution:
p(ψ) =eκ cos(2(ψ− eψ))
πI0(κ)
κ: degree of concentration, I0: modified Bessel function of order 0.
Definition of τ :
τ =
∫pψ(ψ − ψ̃)dψ
πmax pψ(ψ)=
1
πpψ(ψ̃)=⇒ τ = I0(κ)e−κ
6 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Different Orientation Distributions
Truncated uniform distribution:
pU(ψ| eψ,Ψ)
=
{1Ψ |2(ψ − ψ̃)| ≤ Ψ
0 otherwise
Truncated Gaussian distribution:
pG(ψ| eψ,σ)
=
p
G(ψ| eψ,σ)R π/2−π/2
pG(ψ′| eψ,σ)
dψ′−π
2 ≤ ψ ≤π2
0 otherwise
Circular Normal (von Mises) distribution:
pC (ψ|ψ̃, κ) =eκ cos(2(ψ− eψ))
πI0(κ) 7 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Polarimetric Volume Component
• Integration over the orientation angledistribution:
Tv =
∫ π/2
−π/2p(ψ)RT (2ψ)T
′vR
TT (2ψ) dψ
= RT (2 eψ)
[1 gcδ 0
gcδ∗(1+g)
2|δ|2 0
0 0 (1−g)2|δ|2
]RT
T (2 eψ)
with g = I2(κ)I0(κ) , gc = I1(κ)
I0(κ) , τ = I0(κ)e−κ
8 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Polarimetric Volume Component
• Integration over the orientation angledistribution:
Tv =
∫ π/2
−π/2p(ψ)RT (2ψ)T
′vR
TT (2ψ) dψ
= RT (2 eψ)
[1 gcδ 0
gcδ∗(1+g)
2|δ|2 0
0 0 (1−g)2|δ|2
]RT
T (2 eψ)
with g = I2(κ)I0(κ) , gc = I1(κ)
I0(κ) , τ = I0(κ)e−κ
8 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Polarimetric Volume ComponentParameter space
Tv =
1 gc(τ)δ 0
gc(τ)δ∗ (1+g(τ))
2 |δ|2 0
0 0(1−g(τ))
2 |δ|2
Coherency matrix elements in dependence of |δ| and τ :
9 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Generalization
Tv =
1 gc(τ)δ 0
gc(τ)δ∗ 1+g(τ)2 |δ|2 0
0 0 1−g(τ)2 |δ|2
• For layers with a single dominant scattering mechanism type
• Ideal canonical scattering mechanisms:surface, sphere dipole dihedral
|δ| 0 1 ∞α 0 1
4π 1
2π
ρ 1 13
0
• Includes first–order forms as well as random forms
• Related to other volume and surface scattering models: Cloude, 1999, Hajnsek,
2001, Schuler, Lee, 2002, Yamaguchi, 2005.
10 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Parameter RetrievalScattering Anisotropy
Tv =
1 gc(τ)δ 0
gc(τ)δ∗ 1+g(τ)2 |δ|2 0
0 0 1−g(τ)2 |δ|2
• Magnitude:
|δ| =√
tv22 + tv33 =
√〈|Shh − Svv |2〉 〈|Shv |2〉〈|Shh + Svv |2〉
• Phase:
arg δ = arg tv12 = arg(Shh + Svv )(Shh − Svv )∗
• How about the orientation randomness?11 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Understanding the Orientation RandomnessLinear Approximation
Tv =
1 gc(τ)δ 0
gc(τ)δ∗ 1+g(τ)2 |δ|2 0
0 0 1−g(τ)2 |δ|2
Circular normal distribution:
g =I2(κ)
I0(κ), gc =
I1(κ)
I0(κ)
12 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Understanding the Orientation RandomnessLinear Approximation
Tv =
1 gc(τ)δ 0
gc(τ)δ∗ 1+g(τ)2 |δ|2 0
0 0 1−g(τ)2 |δ|2
Linear approximation:
g =
{1− 2τ τ ≤ 1
2
0 τ > 12
, gc = 1− τ12 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Understanding the Orientation RandomnessLinear Approximation
Low orientation randomness τ ≤ 12
Tδ/τ =
1 (1− τ)δ 0(1− τ)δ∗ (1− τ)|δ|2 0
0 0 τ |δ|2
High orientation randomness τ > 1
2 :
Tδ/τ =
1 (1− τ)δ 0(1− τ)δ∗ 1
2 |δ|2 0
0 0 12 |δ|
2
13 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Test Site Traunstein
• Traunstein test site, 11.11.2003
• E–SAR L–band
• Incidence angles: 25◦– 56◦
• Resolution: 1.5m (slant range) x 95cm(azimuth)
• Data:
• Track 1: 09:00• Track 2: 08:50• Track 3: 08:40• Track 4: 08:00
• Used baselines:
• 1–2: 10min, 5m baseline• 1–3: 20min, 10m baseline• 1–4: 1h, 0m baseline
14 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Test Site Traunstein
S T Species Avg. hv ±hv
1 G c Fi-Ta-Bu 12.46m ±2.3m2 G c Fi 13.00m ±0m3 G d Ah-Bu-Fi 13.05m ±0m4 R c Fi-Bu 18.66m ±3.6m5 G c Fi-Ta-Bu 19.68m ±8.6m6 G c Fi-Bu-Ei 26.3m ±1.5m7 G c Fi-Bu-Ei 26.93m ±2.3m8 G d Bu-Ah-Es 27.20m ±3.1m9 G d Bu-Fi-La 27.32m ±0m
10 M c Fi-Bu-La 27.43m ±2.2m11 G c Fi-Bu-La 27.62m ±2.2m12 M c Fi-Bu-Ta 28.43m ±1.6m13 M c Fi-Bi-Bu 30.13m ±2.7m14 M c Fi-Bu-Es 32.49m ±1.6m15 R c Fi-Bu-Ta 33.14m ±2.7m16 R c Fi-Bu-Ah 34.34m ±1.8m17 M c Fi-Bu-Ei 34.59m ±2.5m18 R c Fi-Ta-Ki 34.66m ±1.4m19 R c Fi-Ta-Bu 35.23m ±1.2m20 R c Fi-Bu 36.10m ±1.8m
G: growth, M: mature, R: regenerating.c: coniferous, d: deciduous.Fi: north spruce, Ki: Scots pine, Ta: white fir, La: Eur. larch,Bu: Eur. beech, Es: ash, Ah: maple, Ei: oak, Bi: birch.
15 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Experimental Results: Degree of Orientation Randomness
m = {fg ,Reβ, Imβ, β22, β33, fv ,Re δ, Im δ, τ , hv , rh, σ, γsys , γtemp, φ0}
• Low SDEV.• Dependent on incidence angle.• Discriminates between different forest stands.
16 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Experimental Results: Degree of Orientation Randomness
m = {fg ,Reβ, Imβ, β22, β33, fv ,Re δ, Im δ, τ , hv , rh, σ, γsys , γtemp, φ0}
• Low SDEV.• Dependent on incidence angle.• Discriminates between different forest stands.
16 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Experimental Results: Degree of Orientation Randomness
m = {fg ,Reβ, Imβ, β22, β33, fv ,Re δ, Im δ, τ , hv , rh, σ, γsys , γtemp, φ0}
17 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Experimental Results: Particle Anisotropy
m = {fg ,Reβ, Imβ, β22, β33, fv ,Re δ, Im δ, τ, hv , rh, σ, γsys , γtemp, φ0}
• Anisotropy magnitude > 1 =⇒ possibly multiple scattering.
• Phase as an indicator for forest species type?
18 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Example of Direct DecompositionPauli–basis τ |δ| arg δ
• Forested region: high τ , medium to high |δ|, arg δ ≈ 0.
• Urban area: low τ , different |δ| and arg δ.
• Bare surfaces: low τ , low |δ|.• Crops: varying τ , |δ|, and arg δ =⇒ excellent for crops
classification.
19 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Conclusion
• Volume: particle characteristics + orientation randomness
• Polarization angle distributions
• Generalization to arbitrary scattering mechanism
• Linear approximation for intuitive interpretation
• Quantifying orientation effects in forest canopy
Using a–priori information, or approximations, or multi–angular, ormulti–temporal acquisitions:
=⇒ 3D particle orientations, shapes, permittivities.
=⇒ Vegetation monitoring
20 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Conclusion
• Volume: particle characteristics + orientation randomness
• Polarization angle distributions
• Generalization to arbitrary scattering mechanism
• Linear approximation for intuitive interpretation
• Quantifying orientation effects in forest canopy
Using a–priori information, or approximations, or multi–angular, ormulti–temporal acquisitions:
=⇒ 3D particle orientations, shapes, permittivities.
=⇒ Vegetation monitoring
20 / 22
Thank You!Questions?
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Different Orientation Distributions
Truncated uniform distribution:
pU(ψ| eψ,Ψ)
=
{1Ψ |2(ψ − ψ̃)| ≤ Ψ
0 otherwise
Truncated Gaussian distribution:
pG(ψ| eψ,σ)
=
p
G(ψ| eψ,σ)R π/2−π/2
pG(ψ′| eψ,σ)
dψ′−π
2 ≤ ψ ≤π2
0 otherwise
Circular Normal (von Mises) distribution:
pC (ψ|ψ̃, κ) =eκ cos(2(ψ− eψ))
πI0(κ) 22 / 22
Motivation Volume Component Interpretation Experimental Results Conclusion
Different Orientation Distributions
Tv =
1 gcδ 0
gcδ∗ (1+g)
2 |δ|2 0
0 0 (1−g)2 |δ|2
22 / 22