3-slurry ponds, ash, tailings and dredged sediments

Upload: juan-qarloz-chilcon-carrera

Post on 01-Mar-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    1/118

    Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged SedimentsSlurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged SedimentsSlurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged SedimentsSlurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged SedimentsSlurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    2/118

    INTRODUCTIONThermal power is the chief source of energy in Indiaand accounts for nearly 70 percent for total energyproduction. Indian coal used in thermal power plants(TPP) are having large impurities and hence resulting

    ash content after combustion is very high (40-50%).Coal ash is the ash produced by burning of pulverizedcoal in TPP that gets collected at the bottom offurnace as well as in electrostatic precipitators. Thecoal ash generated from all the existing thermal powerplants is over 100 million tones per year (Gulhati &Datta, 2005). The percentage utilization of coal ashin various construction activities is still limited inIndia compared to other countries. In view of highash content and low percentage utilization, most ofthe fly ash has to be suitably disposed off on land bycreating an engineered ash pond to take care ofenvironmental concerns. The fly ash as well asbottom ash produced by the plant is generallydisposed of in an ash pond in the form of slurry orsometimes (seldom) in dry state. Fly ash and bottomash from the power plant is mixed with water in aratio varying from 1 part ash and 6 to 10 parts ofwater. The slurry is then pumped upto the ash pond

    which are located within few kilometers distance from

    Raising of Dykes of Ash Slurry Pond - ACase Study

    S.K SinghPEC University of Technology, Chandigarh, India ( [email protected])

    Manoj DattaPEC University of Technology, Chandigarh, India (director @pec.ac.in)

    ABSTRACT The present paper deals with design of raising of dykes for ash pond by upstream method usingash as construction material with suitable protection and drainage measures for a Thermal Power Plant inPunjab (India). A site investigation was carried out at the pond and dyke area through SPT and undisturbed

    sampling. Stability analyses were also carried out. Minimum factor of safety for the existing dyke (2.5 H : 1 V)without any consideration of seepage is observed to be 1.5 and in the case of ponding of water (seepagecondition) FOS drops down below 1.0. All the design details including remedial measures are presented in the

    paper.

    the power plant. Due to land scarcity, the dykes othe ash pond are raised once it is filled with ash to takcare of further load of generated ash. Typically, asgenerated from 500 MW thermal power plants gefilled to 10 m height over a period of 5 years (Gandhi

    al., 2000). Therefore, ash ponds are constructed istages and the height of dyke of the ash ponds arrequired to be raised time to time as and when the aslevel reaches nearly top of existing dyke. The raisinof dyke at one time may vary from 3 to 5 m.The present paper deals with the case study of raisinof ash dykes by 3 to 6 m by upstream method forthermal power plant (4x410 MW) located in Punjastate (India). The ash pond occupies a very largarea of 847 acres (3.43 million sq m). Starter dykes oheight 3 m were constructed all along the perimeteof the ash pond in the beginning. These dykes werraised by 3 m for the first time in the year 1997 ansubsequently some part of the dykes were raisefurther by 3 m in the year 2004. Ash level in the ponreached top level of the dyke in the year 200requiring further raising of the dykes to prevent asslurry from overflowing over the dykes Thereforthe case was considered for the raising of dykes by

    m (3

    rd

    raising) and in some stretch by 6 m (2

    nd

    raising

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    3/118

    504 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 2010, New Delhi, India

    OBSERVATIONS FROM SITE VISITThe site visit was undertaken during 2009 and thefollowing observations were noted:The ash pond (Photo 1) occupies a very large area(3.43 million sq m).

    (a) No decanting arrangement for slurry water

    was available.(b) Slurry water was observed to dry out due

    to evaporation and downward flow.(c) At most places the pond was dry.(d) No seepage was observed on the

    downstream side of the dykes.(e) Downstream slope was covered with shrubs

    and access to the toe was difficult.(f) No toe drain was provided.(g) No failure of dyke had been reported in the

    past.(h) The stability analysis should be carried out

    for dry condition and seepage condition both,since water may be ponded behind the dykedue to inadequate drainage facility.

    Photo 1 Photograph of Ash Pond

    SITE INVESTIGATION

    A site investigation programme was drawn up withthe following objectives: To determine the final cross section of

    existing dykes. To ascertain the depth of ash at various

    locations within the pond and existing dyke. To ascertain the type of soil and its

    properties at various locations. To ascertain the depth of water table.

    A total of 22 bore holes were drilled, some at the

    crest of the existing dyke, some at the toe and others

    in the ash pond. Standard penetration test (SPT) waconducted as per IS 2131(1981) and undisturbesamples were taken for the evaluation of engineerinproperties of soil.

    RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTS ON ASH

    The results of laboratory tests of 5 samples receivefrom site and mixed samples are summarized in Table

    TABLE 1: Geotechnical Properties of Coal Ash

    On the basis of the laboratory tests, the followinobservations are made:(a) The ash is predominantly sandy silt though i

    one sample the sand content is observed to blarger.

    (b) The ash is non-plastic in nature.(c) The OMC is observed to vary from 28 to 37

    and the maximum dry density is observed to varfrom 1.06 to 1.21 gm/cc in standard Proctor tes

    (d) The shear strength of compacted ash can b

    characterized by C= 0 and = 31 degrees.

    INFERENCES FROM SITE INVESTIGATIOREPORTSite investigations report indicated the following:(a) The crest width of the existing dyke is 3.0m an

    the height varies between 3.7m to 8.45m adifferent locations.

    (b) The downstream slope of the existing dyke haan inclination of 2.5: 1.0 (h:v).

    (c) The depth of water table varies between 2.45 t6.40m below the ground surface.

    (d) The depth of ash is observed to vary from 4.5 t10.6 m below the crest of the embankment andto 3.0 m below the toe of the embankment.

    (e) The sub soil comprises of silty sand.The following properties of the ash and soil havbeen used for design on the basis of the sitinvestigation report:(a) Ash: Unit weight = 12 kN/cu.m

    C= 0, = 31 deg

    (For colour figure, refer to CD)

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    4/118

    Singh and Datta 50

    (b) Soil: Unit weight = 20 kN/cu.mC = 0, = 32 deg

    STABILITY ANALYSISStability analysis was performed using standardsoftware GEOSLOPE version Slope/W 2007. The

    existing dyke adopted for stability analysis comprisedof ash as the embankment material and silty sand asthe subsoil. Raising of dyke was considered by theupstream method of construction. Factor of safetyof 1.5 and above is considered to be acceptable forlong term stability. The analysis was done for thefollowing cases:Stability of Existing (Starter) Dyke (without seepage)Stability of existing (starter) dyke was analysedwithout seepage (dry case). The minimum factory ofsafety is observed to be close to 1.5 which showsthat the embankment is stable.Stability of Existing (Starter) Dyke (with seepage)If slurry water remains ponded behind the exisiting(starter) dyke for excess period of time, seepage canoccur through the dyke. The factor of safety isobserved to fall below 1.0, making the dyke unstable.As reported by field engineers, such a case is notobserved at GNDTP Bhatinda ash pond where water

    percolates downward or dries up by evaporation.However, internal drains (rock toe, toe drain and sidedrain) are provided in starter as well as raised dykesas remedial measures to drain off ponded water.Stability Analysis with 3 m RaisingStability analysis of existing dyke with 3 m raisingwas carried out. The minimum factory of safety isobserved to be 1.66 which is above 1.5 and hence,the embankment is stable.Stability Analysis with 6 m Raising

    The minimum factory of safety for 6 m raising isobserved to be 1.53 which shows that theembankment is stable.

    DESIGN: RAISING OF DYKE BY 3.0MFigures 1, 3 and 4 shows the components of the ashdyke designed for raising the height by 3.0m by theupstream method. The following are the key features:

    (a) Crest width : 3.0m(b) Height : 3.5m

    (c) Outer slopes (both upstream andownstream): 2.5 : 1.0

    (d) Main material (hearting): compacted ash(e) Cover: 0.5m thick made of local soil which wi

    support vegetation(f) Internal drains (chimney and blanket

    consisting of sand having less than 5% fineas shown in Fig. 1.

    (g) Rock toe for raised dyke: As per details showin Fig. 3.

    (h) Toe drain, cross pipe drain for raised dyke: ashown in Fig. 1.

    (i) Contrary slopes (1 in 500) are provided at 5m interval for longitudinal alignment of todrain.

    (j) Rock toe and toe drain along starter dykThese are remedial measures for starter dykas shown in Fig. 4.

    (k) Erosion protection: Vegetative cover (locgrass which is self sustaining) is to bprovided on the upstream and downstreamslopes; suitable lining / riprap may bconsidered if erosion due to wave action observed on upstream slope.

    (l) Free board : 0.6m

    DESIGN: RAISING OF DYKE BY 6.0MFigures 2 through 4 show the components of the asdyke designed for raising the height by 6.0m by thupstream method. The following are the key feature

    (a) Crest width : 3.0m(b) Height : 6.5m(c) Outer slopes (both upst ream an

    downstream): 2.5 : 1.0(d) Main material (hearting): compacted ash

    (e) Cover: Same as 3 m raising(f) Internal drains (chimney and blanket): Sam

    as 3 m raising(g) Rock toe for raised dyke: Same as 3

    raising(h) Toe drain and cross pipe drain for raise

    dyke: Same as 3 m raising(i) Rock toe and toe drain along starter dyk

    Same as 3 m raising(j) Erosion protection: Same as 3 m raising

    (k) Freeboard : 1.0 m

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    5/118

    506 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 2010, New Delhi, India

    DESIGN: CENTRAL DYKE FOR PIPELINESFigure 5 shows the components of the ash dykedesigned for placement of pipes as a central(partition) dyke. The following are the key features:

    (a) Crest width : 3.0m(b) Height: up to 3.0m

    (c) Outer slopes (both upstream anddownstream): 2:5:1:0

    (d) Main material (hearting): compacted ash(e) Cover: Same as 3 m raising(f) Internal drains (chimney and blanket):

    consisting of sand having less than 5% finesas shown in Fig. 5.

    (g) Rock toe: Same as 3 m raising(h) Erosion protection: Same as 3 m raising

    INFLOW POINTS FOR SLURRY WATERThe inflow points where slurry water is dischargedfrom pipelines should not damage the raised dykes.The discharge should be at least 50m away from thetoe / heel of the raised dyke by a suitable arrangementwhich moves the mouth of the discharge pipe insidethe ash pond. Alternatively the slope and base of theraised dyke or central partition dyke, at inflow points,should be protected as shown in Fig. 6.

    CONSTRUCTION ASPECTS(a) Construction of dykes for raising the height willbe done on dry ash pond area. If an area has beenponded in the recent past, it must be allowed to dryout for at least 30 days.(b) The top 0.3 m of the ash at the surface of the ashpond will be excavated and re-compacted in the samemanner as for the dyke.(c) Ash for the dyke will be compacted at OMC in

    layers of 350mm thickness using vibratory smoothsteel-drum rollers.(d) The roller speed and number of passes will bedetermined from field trial embankment and minimum95% of Proctor Maximum Dry Density will beachieved.(e) A standard quality control programme will befollowed as for monitoring the quality of compactionof ash as for earthworks.

    (f) To prevent dust emissions, the ash will be coverewith local soils as early a possible.(g) Material for construction of drains and filtermust meet the filter criteria.(h) Opinion of a local horticulture expert may be taketo ascertain the type of vegetative cover to b

    provided, keeping in view the local soil and climaticonditions.

    CONCLUDING REMARKSIn the existing dyke, no slurry decantatioarrangement was provided and F.O.S of the startedyke falls below 1 in case of seepage occurs througdyke. Therefore, necessary arrangement for safe exof slurry water has been provisioned from stabilitpoint of view.Results of stability analysis in section 6.2 indicatthat seepage of water through the existing dyke undecondition of prolonged ponding can affect thstability of the dyke. At present such a condition hanot been observed. However, as the height of dykis raised, the head of water increases and thpossibility of seepage increase. Hence monitoring ophreatic line inside the existing starter dyke recommended by use of piezometers. Open stan

    pipe piezometers, up to a depth of 10m from the creof the existing embankment may be installed at spacing of 250m along the dyke. If seepage detected by the development of phreatic line, remedimeasures in the form of a suitable berm and ainternal drain on the downstream side of the existindyke would have to be adopted.

    REFERENCESGandhi, S.R; Raju, V.S. and Kumar, V.(2000) (Ed

    Management of Ash Ponds, Narosa PublishinHouse, New Delhi

    Gulhati S.K. and Datta M. (2005) GeotechnicaEngineering, Tata McGraw-Hill Pub, New Delhi

    IS 2131 (1981) Method for Standard Penetration Tefor Soils,Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delh

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    6/118

    Singh and Datta 50

    Fig.1 Raising of Dyke by 3M

    Fig 2 Raising of Dyke by 6M

    Fig 3 Details of rock toe of raised dyke

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    7/118

    508 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 2010, New Delhi, India

    Fig 4 Details of toe drain and rock toe for starter dyke

    Fig.5 Cross section of Central Dyke

    Fig 6 Protection Details of Central Dyke at Inflow Points

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    8/118

    INTRODUCTIONTailings dams that were built by hydraulic filltechniques show high variability in their geotechnical

    characteristics. The evaluation of thesecharacteristics, which changes by depositionalvariables and tailings characteristics, is extremelyimportant to understand the behaviour of tailingsretaining structures and guarantee their stability.

    The technical literature refers to the large number ofreconstituted tailings samples, which are made byspecial remoulding techniques, for the determinationof resistance and hydraulic parameters of these

    structures. However, it is also known that thehydraulic deposition process can generate depositswith several layers and bedding forms due tovariability of the size and density of particles andflow process. These structural features, which aretypical of hydraulically deposited landfills, aredifficult to recreate in laboratory when using granularsamples produced by remoulding techniques asreferred above.

    To deal with uncertainties that are inherent toreconstituted samples, a methodology to obtain

    The Effects of Iron-waste Samples in the Characterization of TailingsDam Behaviour

    J G MilonasManagement of Geotechnical and Hydrogeology, Vale S.A ([email protected])

    L F M RibeiroDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Braslia ([email protected])

    A P AssisDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Braslia ([email protected])

    ABSTRACT: The geotechnical behaviour of hydraulic fills is strongly dependent on the depositioncharacteristics, which tend to control the strength, permeability and deformability properties of tailings dams.However, this analysis is complex due to the difficulty of obtaining representative samples of field conditions.An alternative to solve this problem has been the use of reconstituted samples that simulate the field patterns.Hence, these methodologies not always simulate all relevant depositional effects. Aiming to support thesample reconstitution process of iron waste tailings, this work presents an alternative methodology of obtainingundisturbed samples from the deposits formed by the hydraulic deposition simulation equipment. It can beconcluded that the methodology to collect undisturbed samples linked to hydraulic deposition simulation testsproved to be an advance in the evaluation of tailings dam behaviour.

    undisturbed granular iron ore samples is developedThese samples came from deposits that were createby hydraulic deposition simulation tests i

    laboratory.

    To evaluate of the hydraulic deposition procesinfluence in the geomechanical behaviour of tailingdams, a comparative analysis of resistancparameters was performed. These parameters werdetermined by drained triaxial tests and referespectively to undisturbed samples anreconstituted samples. Both of them present similacharacteristics such as density, humidity, specifi

    mass of grains, and grain size distribution.

    HYDRAULIC FILLSDams that are built by hydromechanical techniqueare landfills whose process is associated to thhandling, transportation, and distribution of thconstruction material by humid means. In thhydraulic deposition process, grains tend to deposor flow near the landfill surface according to differenflow regimes. The interaction between the flowinsediments and the deposited layer generate

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    9/118

    510 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 2010, New Delhi, India

    changes in the formed layer. These changes arecaused by the accumulation and/or erosion ofsediments and generate distinct sedimentarystructures that, as a consequence, produce distinctgeotechnical characteristics.

    The segregation of particles along the flow path isthe main feature of hydraulic fills. The segregationgenerates a significant effect on the density,geometry of the deposition path, and grain sizedistribution of the deposit. The characteristics ofhydraulic fills depend on the tailings composition(grain densities, fluid viscosity, etc.) and thedeposition method. In this context, the hydraulicdeposition process creates typical structuralcharacteristics such as beddings, depositional

    microstructures, etc. which are difficult to be createdin laboratory by remoulding samples.

    EQUIPAMENT AND MATERIALS

    The Hydraulic Deposition Simulation Test (HDST)The Hydraulic Deposition Simulation Test (HDST)was developed by Ribeiro (2000). That equipmentaims the study of hydraulic deposition mechanismsthrough physical simulations in laboratory. These

    simulations seek to evaluate the geotechnicalbehaviour of tailings deposits with regard to somevariables (flow characteristics, discharge rate, mudconcentration, etc.) that affect hydraulic deposition.The test allows the collection of representativesamples in order to obtain geotechnical parametersthat are similar to the field parameters.

    The HDST apparatus consists basically of three parts:the feeding system; the deposition channel, the main

    HDST part; and the discharge system. These elementsare necessary to simulate the landfill characteristics.Moreover, they work in an integrated manner in orderto keep stable the flow parameters and othernecessary conditions for a controlled hydraulicdeposition process.

    The deposition channel is 6.0 meters long, 0.4 meterswide and 1.0 meter high. Its glass walls allow thevisualization of the whole deposition process along

    the channel. The feeding system is constituted by

    two reservoirs and a special pump that promotes thcontinuous movement of the mixture (tailings anwater) in order to maintain the concentration constanduring the test.

    The mud discharge in the channel is performed b

    means of a flow controller that keeps the mud parallto the channel walls in order to produce a uniformflow and minimize possible effects of them. At thfinal portion of the channel there is a drainage systemto keep the level of the decantation pond constanby eliminating the excess of water. Figure 1 showsschematic drawing of the equipment. More details othis equipment and test procedures can be found iRibeiro (2000).

    Fig.1 Schematic drawing of the Hydraulic DepositioSimulation Test (HDST) (Ribeiro, 2000).

    Iron waste of the gua Limpa ComplexTailings used in these studies come from the iron orprocessing of the mine of the gua Limpa Complein Brazil. This mine, which belongs to Vale, is locatein Rio Piracicaba (MG) at a distance of 140 km from

    Belo Horizonte, the state capital. These tailings hava typical grain size distribution that corresponds tmedium to fine sands. Table 1 displays values otypical parameters of the iron tailings of the guLimpa Complex Mine.

    TABLE 1 Characteristics of the Iron Tailings from guLimpa Mine (Espsito, 2000 and Ribeiro, 2000)

    D10 a (mm) D50

    b (mm) D90 c (mm) Cud Gs

    e

    Fef(%) SiO2g(%) Al2O3

    h (%)

    0.06 0.19 0.48 4 3.1 23 67 0.40

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    10/118

    Milonas, Ribeiro and Assis 51

    aEffective diameter; bAverage diameter; cDiameter thatcorresponds to 90% in the grain size distribution curve;dUniformity coefficient; eRelative density of the solidparticles; fIron; gSilicon oxide; hAluminum oxide.

    METHODOLOGY FOR OBTAININGUNDISTURBED SAMPLESTo obtain undisturbed samples, the hydraulicdeposition simulation test was performed using thesame procedures presented by Ribeiro (2000).Approximated values of 15% by weight of the mixtureconcentration and 15 l/min of flow rate were adoptedduring the simulation test. These numbers representthe common values used in previous simulation testsusing iron tailings in the HDST.

    To obtain undisturbed samples, successive hydraulicdeposition simulations were performed to build adeposit with a thickness higher than 10 cm (height ofthe undisturbed sample) in the central region of thedeposition channel or at 3.0 meter distance from thedischarge point. The drainage system of thedeposition path was carefully controlled in order topromote a subaquatic deposition at the final portionof the deposition channel.

    After concluding the hydraulic deposition, the

    material deposited in the channel was kept still for 24hours approximately to drain the excess of water alongthe deposition path and guarantee good samplingconditions.

    Samples were collected in four points along the HDSTchannel. The first point was situated close to the

    discharge point of the channel. For each point, threundisturbed samples were collected for triaxial angeotechnical characterization tests. These locationalso provided material for reconstituted samples thwere submitted to the same tests. Figure 2 illustratethe scheme of the sampler points in the HDS

    deposition channel. Their position was chosen witthe purpose of evaluating and analyzing possiblstructural variations of the deposit by hydraulisegregation.

    Two-part cylinders were especially designed tcollect of undisturbed samples. They have thin waland a wedge-shaped extremity to facilitate thepenetration into the layer. Their dimensions arinternal diameter of 47 mm, height of 100 mm, an

    thickness of 1.2 mm.The methodology to collect undisturbed samples cabe briefly described by the following stagespreparation and levelling the surface of the deposregion to be sampled; positioning of the cylinderand lateral paring of the core; careful penetration othe cylinder; removal of samples from the HDSchannel; packing, identification, and conditioning osamples in the controlled temperature-moistur

    chamber (Milonas, 2006).The lateral paring combined with the use of thinwalled cylinders tends to minimize the impact causeby the penetration process. All the procedures wercarefully realized in order to minimizing thdisturbance. Figure 3 illustrate the process oobtaining undisturbed samples.

    Fig.3 Lateral paring of the core and sample removfrom the HDST channel.

    Fig.2 Scheme of the distribution of samples along theHDST channel: (a) longitudinal section; (b) top view.(For colour figure, refer to CD)

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    11/118

    512 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 2010, New Delhi, India

    Concerning the characteristics of the undisturbedsamples, Fig. 4 shows typical depositional structuressuch as beddings and others features that were keptin the samples from the HDST.

    (a) (b)

    Fig.4 Undisturbed samples from different locations

    used in the triaxial tests: (a) at the 2.8-meter distancefrom the discharge point; (b) at the 0.1-meter distancefrom the discharge point.

    SAMPLE REMOULDING PROCESSIn general, the remoulding process occurredhomogeneously by the simple deposition of materialin layers followed by the dynamic compaction. Thisaims to give the material the same density of theundisturbed samples or in the field. Inaddition todensity, other conditions such as water and ironcontent, grain size distribution were recreated. Thismethodology was standardized with the purpose ofcreating conditions to compare the results obtainedfrom undisturbed samples and their reconstitutedcounterparts.

    However, in the remoulding process, typical depositionalstructures are not reproduced and, as a consequence,samples display homogeneous profiles (Fig.5).

    Fig.5 Reconstituted sample (0.1A) submitted to triaxial

    test

    LABORATORY TESTS

    Geotechnical CharacterizationThe characterization tests of tailings referred in thpaper followed integrally the guidelines of thBrazilian Standard Test Method (ABNT).

    The density of iron particles is greater than thdensity of silica grains. This property exerts stroninfluence on the specific weight of tailingTherefore, small variation of the iron content cacause significant change of their specific weight. Fotailings from the gua Limpa Complex mine, Espsit(2000) observed a linear relation between specifiweight of grains and iron content and proposed thEquation 1 to relate these variables.

    sa= 0.025 FEb+ 2.60 (1)aSpecific weight of grains (g/cm3); bIron content.

    Table 2 displays the results of the geotechnicacharacterization of undisturbed samples, and Fig.shows the corresponding grain size distributionEquation 1 was used to determine the iron contenof the HDST-collected samples.

    TABLE 2 Geotechnical characteristics of undisturbesamples.

    Spl wa b dc

    sd Fee nf eg

    (%) (kN/m3) (kN/m3) (kN/m3) (%)

    0.1A 12.1 23.1 20.7 35.9 42.4 0.42 0.70.1B 12.4 24.6 22.0 38.0 51.2 0.42 0.70.1C 12.7 22.6 20.0 35.9 42.4 0.44 0.71.0A 14.9 22.5 19.5 33.9 34.4 0.42 0.741.0B 12.2 24.5 21.9 36.8 46.0 0.41 0.61.0C 12.7 20.9 18.5 31.5 24.4 0.41 0.7

    2.0A 15.2 20.5 17.8 30.5 20.4 0.41 0.72.0B 14.6 20.6 17.9 29.0 14.4 0.38 0.62.0C 15.4 18.8 16.3 28.4 12.0 0.43 0.72.8A 12.6 20.2 17.9 27.7 8.8 0.39 0.542.8B 10.7 18.5 16.8 27.9 10.0 0.40 0.672.8C 14.3 20.0 17.6 28.2 11.2 0.38 0.6

    aWater content; bNatural specific weight(kN/m3); cApparedry specific weight(kN/m3); dSpecific weight of the solid(kNm3); eIron percentage; fPorosity, and gVoid index.

    (For colour figure, refer to CD)

    (For colour figure, refer to CD)

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    12/118

    Milonas, Ribeiro and Assis 51

    The geotechnical properties related to undisturbedand reconstituted samples presented similar values.In the remoulding process the main physicscharacteristics were carefully reproduced in order toallow the comparisons. Considering this aspect, theremoulding process of samples for triaxial tests could

    be considered satisfactory. The data obtained fromthe remoulding samples were analogous to theundisturbed ones presented in Table 2. Thehomogeneity was the only different feature.

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10

    Particle Diameter (mm)

    %

    Passing

    Sample 1 - 0.1 m

    Sample 2 - 1.0 m

    Sample 1 - 2.0 m

    Sample 1 - 2.8 m

    CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL

    Fig. 6 Grain Size Distribution.

    Triaxial Tests

    For the determination of strength parameters of iron

    ore tailings, drained triaxial tests were performed

    applying confining pressures of 50, 100, and 200 kPa.

    Two samples were used: undisturbed samples, which

    are representative of the hydraulic deposition process,

    and homogeneous reconstituted samples. The

    specimens were saturated, compressed and sheared

    according to procedures suggested by HEAD (1986).Saturation was monitored, ensuring B values of at

    least 0.98 for all specimens. The triaxial tests were run

    at a sufficiently low axial displacement rate to ensure

    full drainage within the sample (0.07 mm/min).

    The shear strength behaviour from triaxial tests with

    an undisturbed sample and a remoulding sample

    related to 1.0-meter from the discharge point are

    shown in Figure 7 and 8 respectively.

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    0% 5% 10% 15% 20%

    Axial Strain (%)

    1

    -3

    (kPa)

    50 kPa

    100 kPa

    200 kPa

    (a )

    (b)

    Fig. 7 Response of the undisturbed sample collected the 1.0-meter distance from the discharge point: (a) stress

    strain curves, (b) Shear strength envelope

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    0% 5% 10% 15% 20%

    Axial Strain (%)

    1

    -3

    (kP

    a)

    50 kPa

    100 kPa

    200 kPa

    (a )

    (b)

    Fig. 8 Response of theremoulding sample at the 1.0meter distance from the discharge point: (a) stress-strai

    curves, (b) Shear strength envelope.

    (For colour figure, refer to CD)

    (For colour figure, refer to CD)

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    13/118

    514 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 2010, New Delhi, India

    Considering the strength parameters, Table 3

    summarizes the results of all triaxial tests carried out

    in both kinds of samples.

    TABLE 3 Strengthparameters from triaxial tests.

    Samples Undisturbed Remoulding

    Samples naverage

    a ()b ()b

    0,1 0,43 38,5 34,9

    1,0 0,41 38,7 35,2

    2,0 0,41 38,7 35,6

    2,8 0,38 41,3 36,2

    a Porosity, b Effective frictional angle

    Although the undisturbed samples and theirreconstituted counterparts show similar density,

    water content, grain size distribution, porosity and

    iron content, the stress-strain curves suggest a

    distinct behaviour and show the influence of the

    deposition process. Additionally, it can observe an

    increase in the strength parameters linked to the

    undisturbed samples

    ANALYSIS OF RESULTSThe laboratory-testing program here described

    allowed the analyses of the variability of geotechnical

    parameters as a function of the hydraulic deposition

    process. This process is associated to erosion and

    deposition events, related to the segregation pattern.

    The particles movement, characterized by rolling and

    sliding, is evidenced by the formation of beddings in

    the flow direction represented by a sequence of iron

    and quartz bands.

    Near to the discharge point, the deposit contains

    higher concentration of fines and iron particles.

    There is an increase of the average diameter of

    particles in the central part of the deposit, associated

    predominantly to quartz particles. This fact can be

    explained by the high values of specific gravity linked

    to the iron particles and consequently highest

    velocities to transport them. These observations

    reinforce the results obtained by Ribeiro (2000

    Hernandez (2002), and Presotti (2002) using simila

    iron wastes. These authors demonstrated that th

    segregation of iron ore tailings occurs predominantl

    due to the weight of particles.

    In the present studies, the porosity decreaseslightly, indicating the existence of denser and mor

    stable deposits at the 3.0-meter distance from th

    discharge point.

    In addition to the hydraulic deposition process, hig

    variability of geotechnical parameters was als

    observed along the transversal section of the channe

    These differences are probably associated to the flo

    pattern, which tends to generate small channels b

    formation of small barriers that redirects the flow an

    produces some regions with different physic

    characteristics.

    HDST-originated undisturbed samples were able t

    keep beddings and other structural features that wer

    generated during the hydraulic deposition as show

    before. The sample remoulding process wa

    considered satisfactory because it was able t

    reproduce some of the properties of the material from

    the HDST deposition channel, however i

    homogeneous conditions.

    Strength parameters are higher for undisturbe

    samples than their reconstituted counterparts. Stres

    strain curves revealed different behaviours for bot

    samples. Undisturbed samples display a fragil

    behaviour while their reconstituted samples have

    ductile behaviour. In general, undisturbed sample

    present a well-defined failure surface. On the othe

    hand, the reconstituted samples produced a bulge i

    the central region instead of defining any failursurface (Fig.9). The effective frictional angles () oundisturbed samples were 3o to 4ohigher than th

    reconstituted samples (Table 3).

    The different behaviour of undisturbed samples ca

    be associated to a larger interlocking of grain

    generated during the hydraulic deposition. Tha

    interlocking keeps the particles packed to each othe

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    14/118

    and creates, as a consequence, a larger link among

    them. The existence of beddings parallel to the flow

    direction also helps explain the distinct behaviour of

    undisturbed samples. It is important to reinforce that

    these features were not reproduced during the

    remoulding methodology.

    (a) (b)

    Fig.9 Final aspect of specimens obtained at 2.8-meterfrom the discharge point for the confining pressure of 100

    kPa. (a) undisturbed sample, (b) reconstituted sample.

    Figure 10 represents the response of frictional angle

    versus average porosity. It can observe that an

    increase in the porosity represents a decrease in the

    value obtained for both sort of samples. It is alsoobserved that undisturbed samples show better

    results than their reconstituted counterparts. This

    difference, which is close to 10% in numerical terms,

    emphasizes the importance of the deposition effects

    for the geomechanical behaviour of iron ore tailings.

    Fig. 10 Relationship between frictional angle andporosity.

    CLOSING REMARKSThe applied methodology to collect undisturbe

    samples, which is associated to hydraulic depositio

    simulation tests, showed to be an important advanc

    in the evaluation of the geotechnical behaviour o

    tailings dams. Some results have already indicate

    this as a matter of fact. However, it is important temphasize that this methodology is still at th

    beginning and additional studies are necessary t

    improve it. This work seeks to develop idea

    concerning the behaviour of hydraulic fills throug

    the use of undisturbed samples by HDST simulation

    This approach became feasible due to the advantage

    that the HDST apparatus offer in order to reproduc

    field conditions. In relation to the researches alread

    realized with the HDST, most of them hav

    demonstrated the applicability of the equipment t

    forecast the geometry, grain size distribution, an

    density of tailings dams construction by hydrauli

    fill method (Ribeiro, 2000; Cavalcante, 2000). Th

    collection ofundisturbed samples along the HDS

    deposit presents an innovative character an

    demonstrates the importance of the application o

    physical simulations to estimate the hydraulic fil

    behaviour.

    REFERENCES

    Cavalcante, A.L.B. (2000) Efeito do Gradiente d

    Permeabilidade na Estabilidade de Barragens d

    Rejeito Alteadas pelo Mtodo de Montante,MSDissertat ion, , Department of Civil an

    Environmental Engineering, Univers ity o

    Braslia, 186 p.

    Espsito, T.J. (2000) Metodologia Probabilstica Observacional Aplicada a Barragens de Rejeit

    Construdas por Aterro Hidrulico, PhD ThesiDepartment of Civil and Environmenta

    Engineering, University of Braslia, 363 p.

    Head, K.H. (1986) Manual of Soil Laboratory Testin

    London, UK: Pentech Press, Vol.3, 1240 p.

    Milonas, Ribeiro and Assis 51

    (For colour figure, refer to CD)

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    15/118

    516 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 2010, New Delhi, India

    Hernandez, H.M. (2002) Caracterizao Geomecnicade Rejeitos Aplicada a Barragens de Aterro

    Hidrulico,MSc. Dissertation, Department of Civiland Environmental Engineering, University of

    Braslia, 174 p.

    Lopes, M.C.O. (2000) Disposio Hidrulica deRejeitos Arenosos e Influncia nos Parmetros deResistncia, MSc. Dissertation, Department ofCivil and Environmental Engineering,

    University of Braslia, 157 p.

    Milonas, J.G. (2006) Anlise do Processo deReconstituio de Amostras para Caracterizaodo Comportamento de Barragens de Rejeitos de

    Minrio de Ferro em Aterro Hidrulico, MSc.

    Dissertat ion , Department of Civil an

    Environmental Engineering, Univers ity o

    Braslia, 146 p.

    Presotti, E.S. (2002) Influncia do Teor de Ferro noParmetros de Resistncia de um Rejeito d

    Minrio de Ferro,MSc. Dissertation, Departmeof Civil Engineering, Federal University of Our

    Preto, 153 p.

    Ribeiro, L.F.M. (2000) Simulao Fsica do Processde Formao dos Aterros Hidrulicos AplicadoBarragens de Rejeitos, PhD. Thesis, Departmen

    of Civil and Environmental Engineering

    University of Braslia, 235 p.

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    16/118

    Optimization of the Inwash Technology of the CascadeTailing Dump Levee in Permafrost Region

    A.B. Lolaev,

    North Caucasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (State Technological University), Vladikavkaz,

    Russia ([email protected])V.V. Butygin

    Norilsk Institute of Industry, Norilsk, Russia ([email protected])

    A.P. Akopov,

    North Caucasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (State Technological University), Vladikavkaz,

    Russia ([email protected])

    A.Kh. Oganesian,

    North Caucasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (State Technological University), Vladikavkaz,

    Russia ([email protected])

    M.N. Sumin

    North Caucasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (State Technological University), Vladikavkaz,

    Russia ([email protected])

    ABSTRACT: The exploitation of the tailing dump in Norilsk industrial region (north of Siberia)has begun since 1983 with the purpose of warehousing of tails and organization of system of

    turnaround water supply. The tailing dump is the cascade type of dumps with difference in

    grades of the tops of dams about 20 meters. The technology of controlled inwashing of the

    levee was designed and recommendations for stability providing were carried out. The results

    of investigations will permit to provide safety exploitation of tailing dam, improve the

    environmental situation in the region and increase the efficiency of production.

    INTRODUCTION

    High level of industrialization of northern regions of

    Russia causes significant geocryological problems

    in the soil. Only in Siberia in the areas of large mining

    and metallurgical enterprises dozens of million cubic

    meters of different deposits have been accumulatingfor a long time in the tailing dumps.

    Sufficient attention has been given lately to this

    problem of geotechnics of mining, metallurgical

    wastes and tailing dams in Norilsk regions (Lolaev

    et al., 1997, Lolaev et al., 2004, Lolaev and Butygin,

    2005).

    The problem of capacity increasing of operating

    tailing dumps becomes more and more urgent with

    the further economic development. Taking int

    account the fact, that disposal area should functio

    for 15- 20 years, the main objective of this paper

    to develop the special technology of inwash of th

    cascade type of the tailing dump in Norilsk regio

    for its operation period and make in-sit

    investigations of these techniques.

    CASE HISTORY

    The climatic characteristics of Norilsk industri

    region are:

    average annual temperature of the air is -9.4 0C

    the maximum temperature of the air is +32 0C an

    the minimum temperature is -56 0C;

    the maximum speed of wind is 40 m/sec;

    winds with speed above 15 m/sec are observeduring 90 days;

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    17/118

    518 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 2010, New Delhi, India

    the strong winds and snowfalls are observed up

    to 130 days a year;

    average amount of precipitations is 564.5 mm per

    year.

    The object of research of the present work is the

    tailing dump Lebyazhie, located on the territoryof Norilsk industrial region.

    The exploitation of the disposal area has begun

    since 1983 with the purpose of warehousing of tails

    from concentrating mill and organization of system

    of turnaround water supply (Recommendations,

    1977).

    The basic hydraulic engineering structures include:

    pool for reception of pulp and storage of tails

    local tailing dam;

    system of pipelines for transportation of pulp

    system of pipelines for turnaround water supply

    with coastal and floating pump stations

    spillway system

    The disposal area provides sedimentation,

    clarification and natural stabilization of ionic

    structure of turnaround water acting with tails. Theclearing of water from firm phase is done with the

    help of gravitation method.

    The constructive characteristics of the dam are:

    1. the disposal area - 4.02 sq.kms

    2. the length of the tailing dam - 8.1 kms

    3. the tailing dam is carried out as a persistent

    drainage prism from metallurgical slag:

    the width of the prism - 8 m the length of the prism - 8500 m

    4. the capacity of disposal area - 16.7 mln. m3

    5. the settlement term of operation - 20 years

    6. the height of the dam - 39.3 m;

    7. the inclination of a top drain level - 1: 50

    8. the inclination of a bottom slope - 1: 4

    9. the maximal depth of pool 4.7 m10. the average depth of pool 2.5 m.

    The exploitation period of the tailing dump was

    planned for twenty years.

    TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    Since 1992 in connection with the changes i

    technological processes of concentrating mil

    reduction of volumes of processing of ores an

    complexities in transportation of tails, the norther

    part of a tailing dam practically was not raised, thhas resulted in considerable reduction of capacit

    of pool. The decision about tailing dam filling b

    old (stale) tails was accepted in 1997 for the rapi

    rise.

    The data obtained during the field and laborator

    researches have made the reasons and productio

    of physical model of the inwashing of the tailin

    dump. With the help of this model the know

    technologies of constructions of such type of tailin

    dump, were estimated, the exploitation data wa

    analyzed, the suggestions of exploitation service

    were approved.

    As a result of mutual research-and-productio

    investigations the technology of controlle

    inwashing of the levee was designed. It include

    the following operations:

    the construction of the retaining prism from

    metallurgical slag. The metal distributin

    slurry pipeline is laid on it;

    the construction of ring slag fill in the beac

    zone at the specific distance from the ax

    of the distributing slurry pipeline. It retain

    the solid particles in the beach zone an

    simultaneously it illuminates the wate

    coming into the pool.

    The scheme of the levee inwash is shown in Fig.

    Functions of a slurry collecting prism in operatio

    of an inwash are the following:

    Fig. 1The Scheme of the Levee Inwash

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    18/118

    1 - distributive slurry pipeline; 2 - geotextile anti-

    filtration screen; 3 load; 4 a slag prism; 5 aretaining prism of a dam; 6 slurry collecting slagprism

    slurry collecting prism promotes more intensiveconsolidation of hydraulic fill tails and increase

    of stability of a dam; it allows operating of bottom contour formation

    in pond zone that is rather an important factor

    that provides winter storing of tails under ice;

    it promotes more intensive frost penetration inan inwash massif that raises its static and

    filtration stability and in that way provides

    environmental safety of the tailing dump;

    it carries out reinforcing a body of a leveefunction.

    On a backslope of a dam an impervious screen from

    geotextiles is being placed. The inwash is made by

    sections of 800-1000m in width, after formation of a

    layer of tails with the capacity of H0,5 m, hydraulicfill section is left for rest(10-15 days). The givenway of an inwash already for the first years (1997-

    1998) has provided an advance growth of a dam.

    This measure has allowed to increase the height of a

    dam and the capacity of the disposal area for the next

    10 years. Today the top of the dam is about 70 m.

    Now, in connection with planned substantial growth

    of an exits of tails there was a new problem emerged

    the increase in the capacity of the Lebyazhietailing dump and its service time. Therefore

    optimization of the inwash technology of the tailing

    dump was carried out in view of this important

    condition.

    From 2006 the tailing dump has the second tailing

    pond. The second pond is under the construction.

    The top of the dam of the second pond is about 50

    meters now. Thus the tailing dump Lebyazhieisthe cascade type of dumps with difference in grades

    of the tops of dams about 20 meters. Planned level

    of the top of the dam is 90 meters.

    The constructive characteristics of the second

    tailing pond and dam are:

    1. the disposal area - 2.4 sq.kms

    2. the length of the tailing dam - 4.3 kms

    3. the tailing dam is carried out as a persistent

    drainage prism from metallurgical slag:

    the width of a prism - 8 m

    the length of a prism - 4313 m

    4. the capacity of disposal area - 16.7 mln. m3

    5. the settlement term of operation - 20 years

    6. the height of dam 19-20 m;7. the inclination of a top drain level - 1:50-1:100

    8. the inclination of a bottom slope - 1:4-1:5

    9. the maximal depth of pool 5.2 m10. the average depth of pool 2.9 m.

    Despite the received beneficial effects o

    introduction of technology of an operated inwas

    of a levee on the second tailing pond, its practicrealisation is connected with the considerabl

    material and financial expenses, connected, in the

    turn, with the annual relifting of a dam, resurfacin

    of slurry pipelines, etc.

    Optimisation of the inwash technology has bee

    executed by the following criteria: stability of th

    levee; decrease in material and financial expense

    for operation; industrial and environmental safet

    of a construction, the maximum use of capacity etThe technology which satisfies all criteria

    considered to be the optimum one.

    As the basic technological variants of operation th

    following ones were being considered:

    1. Operation of two fields by turns, achievemen

    of a design elevation by the first field, with la

    of growth of a dam ridge of the second field an

    operation of two ponds.

    2. Operation of two fields by turns with aadvanced inwash of a levee of the second fiel

    and operation of two ponds.

    3. An advanced inwash of the second field befor

    achievement of a ridge of a levee of the fir

    field and the further operation of integrate

    tailing dump with one pond .

    Variants of inwash and warehousing of tails wer

    investigated by means of physical and mathematic

    modelling. Object of researches was th

    Lolaev et al. 51

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    19/118

    520 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 2010, New Delhi, India

    substantiation of parametres of modelling,

    conformity from positions of the theory of model

    tests similarity of results to the results of tests in-

    situ, modelling of inwash methods of two fields

    during the summer and winter periods. On the basis

    of the analysis of mathematical calculations and

    results of model tests the optimum technologicalparametres of the inwash scheme of the dam were

    defined in the course of approbation.

    The developed technology of the dam inwash takes

    into consideration the height of a dam inwashed for

    one cycle and as a whole for a year, the width of

    front of an inwash, the quantity of the inwashed

    tails, operations schedule etc. The beach sectoring

    for the determination of the volume of the inwashed

    tails is presented in Fig. 2.

    Fig. 2 The Beach Sectoring

    The quantity of the inwashed tails for a cycle was

    defined further. The inwash of the dam is made by

    gradual moving of the inwash sections 900-1200 m

    in length (Fig. 3).

    Fig. 3 Sequence of the Sections Inwash

    The schedule of the inwash works is made for the

    whole year. This, in its turn, has allowed to design

    the duration of the dam operation until achievementof its design elevation (Fig. 4).

    Fig. 4 Scheme of a Dam Inwash on Years

    During the inwash process and the subsequen

    consolidation the values of physical and mechanicproperties of the filled-up grounds are bein

    established. The changes of the dam stabilit

    coefficient during the working life are carried out.

    The obtained results are included in a database an

    can be replenished in the course of reception of ne

    data about the structure of the inwashed body o

    about the physical and mechanical properties of tai

    composing it. On the basis of the carried out work

    the generalisation of the results is being made antechnological regulations are being developed.

    CONCLUSIONS

    Thus, the optimisation of the inwash technology ha

    allowed: to achieve the increase in the stabilit

    coefficient of the dam and of the construction as

    whole during its working life, to raise the level of th

    industrial and environmental safety, to provide th

    achievement to the design elevation of the levels o

    the ridges of the first and of the second field damsimultaneously. That will permit to provide th

    required capacity for warehousing of the tails for th

    whole working life without building of new stores.

    REFERENCESLolaev, A.B. et al. (1997). Site investigation of tailin

    dam in permafrost region. Proceedings of th

    Geoenvironmental Engineering Conference

    Lolaev, A.B., Butygin, V.V. and Kaitmazov, N.G. (2004

    Environmental Aspects of HydrotechnicaConstruction in Cryolitic Zone.Proc. 7th Inter

    Symposium on Cold Region Developmen

    Sapporo,Japan

    Lolaev, A.B. and Butygin, V.V. (2005). Geologica

    and ecological problems of industria

    hydraulic engineering in cryolite zon

    Moscow: Nedra. 240. (in Russian).

    Recomendations on designing the structures of tailin

    pools and dams in severe climatic condition

    (1977). Moscow: Stroyizdat. (in Russian)

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    20/118

    Acid Mine Drainage Pollution in a Tailings Pond in the State of Mexico

    L Lizrraga-Mendiola

    University Autonomous of the State of Hidalgo, Mexico ([email protected])

    M R Gonzlez-Sandoval, M C Durn-Domnguez

    National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico ([email protected],

    [email protected])

    A Blanco-Pin

    University Autonomous of the State of Hidalgo, Mexico ([email protected])

    ABSTRACTThe mineralogy of tailings deposited in the tailings pond consists of: Pyrite (55%), sphalerite (2%), galena (0.7%), and

    chalcopyrite (0.6%). The results from chemical analysis showed that exist pollutants: Fe, Mn, SO42- and Zn. The study

    area is divided in two zones: In the zone 1, it was observed the presence of natural weathering, due to a phenomeno

    known as acid rock drainage (ARD); on the other hand, in zone 2, there was a clear influence of acid mine drainag

    (AMD). Seasonal variations were observed, and the pollutants behavior shows dissolution capacity of rocks antailings during dry and wet season, related to acidic pH values.

    INTRODUCTION

    Sulphide minerals, such as pyrite, are exposed to

    atmospheric conditions and weathered in tailings

    impoundments, waste rock piles and walls of pit

    lakes. During sulphide oxidation, S and Fe(II) are

    dissolved and oxidized, with the assistance of

    dissolved O2

    and Fe(III). Acid, SO4-rich effluent

    that is formed in this process transports heavy

    metals and Fe to the environment (Kumpulainen

    et al., 2007). Thus, the monitoring and modeling

    of the distribution of metals, especially in mining

    areas, is an important subject in studies aimed at

    the evaluation of environmental pollution (Edet et

    al., 2004). Local climate conditions can control

    the formation of secondary minerals because the

    chemical composition of the draining water can

    vary with seasons (Kimball, 1999; Kim et al.,

    2002; Yu and Heo, 2001; Schroth and Parnell,2005). Chemical changes in water vary due to

    variations in temperature and precipitation. The

    objective of this study was to evaluate the

    seasonal variation of minerals which control the

    acid mine drainage (AMD) and the acid rock

    drainage (ARD) generation.

    Description of the Study Area

    The study area is located SW of the State o

    Estado de Mexico, in the central part of th

    Mexican Republic (Fig. 1). The altitude is 1200

    meters (m.a.s.l.), and the predominant climate i

    from temperate to warm (30 C in summer, 10 to

    16 C in winter) with dry winter and rainy

    summer (1500 mm annual average rainfall).

    Processing plant

    At the processing plant, the extracted mineral i

    crushed and milled to 200-mesh particle size. Th

    Zn, Pb and Cu sulfides are concentrated by

    flotation, and the remnant materials, around 95%

    of the mineral (rich in pyrite -FeS2-), are pumped

    as water slurry to the tailings pond. Th

    mineralogy of these tailings presents high contentof potentially acidic drainage generating minerals

    Pyrite (55%), sphalerite (2%), galena (0.7%), and

    chalcopyrite (0.6%). Currently, this mine site i

    active; the tailings pond surface area is 132800 m

    approximately, and contains around 5.5 million

    of tons of tailings (Lizrraga-Mendiola et al

    2008).

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    21/118

    522 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 2010, New Delhi, India

    Fig.1 Location of the Study Area, as well as the

    Sampling Points (Lizrraga-Mendiola et al., 2008).

    Methodology

    Water and tailing samplings were carried out

    during the years 2004-2007. Methodology of

    sampling and analysis is discussed by Lizrraga-

    Mendiola et al. (2008). For the hydrogeochemical-

    modeling, the PHREEQC program was used, andthe Wateq4f database included in this program

    was utilized for calculations (Parkhurst and

    Appelo, 1999).

    Results and Discussion

    In previous studies Lizrraga-Mendiola et al.

    (2008) have defined the study area into two zones:

    zone 1 (upstream the tailings pond, out from the

    influence of pollutants), and zone 2 (downstreamthe tailings pond, on the influence of AMD

    pollutants migration) (Fig. 1, Tables 1 and 2).

    Water chemistry

    The results obtained from the chemical analysis

    showed that, for both zones (zone 1 and zone 2),

    the pH (acid) is below the permissible maximum

    limit (PML) (DOF 1994) during wet, but also

    during dry seasons; pH (basic) is above the PML

    in rainy season and slightly acid during dry seaso

    (Table 1).

    TABLE 1 Description of Water Samples (Lizrrag

    Mendiola et al., 2008)

    Sample Description and distance from tailings

    pond

    PJMA1 Small pond, to the west (250 m)

    PJMA2 Small pond, to the west (50 m)

    PJMA3 Small pond, to the west (700 m)

    PJMA4 Rainwater deviated, to the west (150

    m)

    PJMA5 Water recovered from processing

    activities (400 m)

    PJMA6 Tailings water deviated through pipes

    (350 m)PJMA7 Springwater conducted through pipes

    (1500 m)

    PJMA8 Groundwater from mines, deposited

    as superficial water in pools (1000 m)

    PJMA9 El Ahogado river, downstream (1300

    m)

    PJMA10 El Ahogado river, upstream (950 m)

    Only in PJMA9 during dry season (april 2005) pH

    value was very acidic. With respect to thparameters that indicate the presence of AMD

    almost all of them show to be higher than PML i

    every season of sampling (Table 2). Only i

    PJMA1 and PJMA2, pH, Mn and Zn were equa

    or almost equal to PML. Although it is observed

    clear difference between zones 1 and 2, in zone

    there is an augment in AMD pollutan

    concentration during dry season (acid pH, an

    high Fe, Mn, SO42-

    , and Zn values).

    However, even when there is no direct influenc

    in zone 1 from the tailings pond, and when pH

    was basic occasionally, there was found th

    presence of AMD pollutants also. From thes

    results, it can be interpreted that the pollutio

    source in zone 1 can be a natural weathering from

    rocks, phenomenom better known as acid roc

    drainage (ARD).

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    22/118

    TABLE 2 Pollutants found in the Sampling Points around the Tailings Pond (minimum, maximum value)

    *PML: Permissible maximum limits (DOF, 1994). Blank spaces mean no contaminant value determined. 2April 2004September 2005, 5January 2006, 6March 2007. Values in bold are almost equal or equal to the PML.

    Hydrogeochemistry

    From the hydrogeochemical modeling analysis,

    the following behavior of these pollutants was

    observed: during wet seasons and basic pH values,

    pollutants remained on equilibrium or precipitated

    (oversaturation); on the other hand, during dry

    seasons and acid pH values, pollutants remained

    diluted or subsaturated (Table 3). The ionic

    strength (I) of water ranges between 7.753-4 and

    8.046-2

    (mean of 4.06-2

    ). According to Alpers andBlowes (1994) and Appelo and Postma (1999), the

    I for freshwater is normally > 0.02. The values of

    the I show that water samples from the area are

    fresh. On the other hand, according to Sracek et al.

    (2004), in oxidizing environments, like in this

    case of study, the principle attenuation mechanism

    of contaminants related to AMD is the adsorption

    on Fe(III) oxide and hydroxides. Also, the

    changes in pH can be related to some redox

    reactions, driving dissolution of carbonates an

    silicates. Unfortunately, in the study area, there i

    no presence of these minerals in abundance to b

    considered as an alternative to solve this pollutio

    problem. Seiler et al. (2005) found in their stud

    that some parameters such as W and Cl in th

    Carson River appeared to be controlled b

    evaporative concentration, using PHREEQC t

    calculate ionic activity product (IAP), an

    compared it with Ksp for primary W minerals. Ithis study, PHREEQC is used to observe th

    seasonal variation of saturation index values (SI

    From Table 3, primary minerals such as FeS

    Fe2S, and ZnS are very subsaturated and ar

    present in zone 1. From these, pyrite showed to b

    the most soluble mineral, liberating Fe during dr

    season. Hematite was the only Fe-minera

    oversaturated during all sampling seasons (and ha

    no presence in zone 2).

    Zone 1 Zone 2Mineral species

    PJMA14 PJMA22 PJMA24 PJMA25 PJMA74 PJMA44

    Ionic strength, I (M) 1.411-3 6.303-4 7.753-4 2.906-4 1.585-3 8.046-2

    Anglesite, PbSO4(sec)

    Anhidrite, CaSO4(sec) -0.21

    Cd(SO4)Celestite, SrSO4 -0.46

    Fe(OH)3 (a) 2.94 2.8 -3.39 3.35

    FeS (ppt) -83.48

    Goethite, FeO(OH) 8.83 8.7 2.51 9.24

    Gypsum, CaSO4.2(H2O) 0.02

    Hausmannite, Mn3O4(prim)

    -9.84 -8.18 -28.82 -14.16 -12.7

    Hematite, Fe2O3 19.63 19.81 7.32 20.28

    Mackinawite, (Fe,Ni)S0.9 -82.74

    Manganite, MnO(OH) -4.32 -4.25 -11.86 -6.11 -5.42

    Melanterite,Fe(SO4).7(H2O) (sec)-12.42

    Pyrite, FeS2 -137.51

    Pirochroite, Mn(OH)2 -5.89 -5.87 -10.91 -7.16 -6.06

    Pirolusite, MnO2(sec) -8.75 -7.66 -18.08 -10.72 -11.1

    Esphalerite, (Zn,Fe)S -70.96 -47.05

    Willemite, Zn2SiO4 0.71 -1.37 -0.62

    Zn(OH)2 -1.75 1.24 -2.91 -2.43

    Mendiola et al. 52

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    23/118

    524 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 2010, New Delhi, India

    TABLE 3 Summary of Hydrogeochemical Results

    of Water Samples in zones 1 and 2

    2April 2005, 4September 2005, 5January 2006, 6March

    2007.

    With respect to secondary minerals, Mn-minerals

    were the most abundant and are subsaturated

    during all seasons of sampling in both zones. In

    zone 2, only in PJMA4 there was possible to

    analyze the hydrogeochemical behavior due the

    scarcity of information. This hydrogeochemical

    behavior is congruent with water chemistry

    results, indicating that no matters the season of the

    year, mineral concentrations are higher enough to

    generate AMD or ARD pollution, depending on

    the location of sampling points with respect to the

    tailings pond. What it was expected is that

    sampling points closer to the tailings pond were

    more polluted.

    Behavior of contaminants

    From Figures 2 and 3, there is observed tha

    contaminants (Fe, Mn, Zn, and pH and SI) ar

    related. When pH was acid, concentration of thes

    ions were higher; on the contrary, when pH wa

    slightly acid or neutral, ions concentratio

    decreased in both zones. This behavior was almosthe same during every season of the year

    analyzed for this study. From these, the pH i

    zone 2 was the most acidic and the pollutant

    concentrations the highest.

    Fig.2Contaminants Behavior vs pH.

    Fig.3Saturation Index vs pH.

    Sample pH Fe Mn SO42- Zn

    PML* 6.5-

    8.5

    0.3 0.05 250 5.0

    Zone 1

    PJMA1 8.762 0.542,

    4.250.054

    PJMA2 5.194

    ,

    9.355

    0.464,

    5.250.054 5.085

    PJMA3 5.132 0.262 7.462

    PJMA7 4.05

    PJMA8 6.24,

    3.5465.12,

    18.8515.22,

    11.542216.45

    ,

    46506

    107.

    672,

    37.56

    PJMA10 3.45 39.55

    Zone 2

    PJMA4 4.55

    2

    ,

    4.0854.1

    5

    ,0.486 4.5

    2

    ,8.164 2883.1

    2

    ,

    3830417.8

    5

    ,

    10.3

    16

    PJMA5 6.245

    ,

    3.576

    48.82,

    5.943.182,

    12.0162806.52

    ,

    46606

    7.422

    ,

    46.25

    PJMA6 3.982

    ,

    6.195

    5.65,

    9.5763.182,

    12.8161504.55

    ,

    48806

    7.132

    ,

    45.65

    PJMA9 2.52 88.562,

    0.4647.352,

    0.0643786.92

    ,

    2594.0

    35

    8.152

    ,

    5.05

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    24/118

    In Figure 3, the behavior of SI vs pH shows that, from zone 1, SI was near neutral, and the pH wa

    acidic (PJMA2-2), slightly acidic (PJMA1-4 and

    PJMA7-3) in all seasons, while pH was basic

    (PJMA2-4) during wet season. From zone 2, the

    only sampling point represented shows high

    dissolution capacity and the most acidic

    environment during wet season. From theseresults, it can be mentioned that ARD in zone 1,

    and AMD in zone 2 have the potential to produce

    pollution through the dissolution of rocks and

    tailings minerals, respectively.

    Conclusions

    This study shows an analysis of pollutants related

    to AMD and ARD pollution. Seasonal changes

    were measured, during dry and wet seasonsthrough several years. From these, it was observed

    that pollutants were present every season

    measured, and that these pollutants are related to

    acidic pH and negative SI values. These

    conditions indicate the facility of rocks (in zone 1)

    and tailings minerals (in zone 2) to dilute and to

    liberate pollutants, characteristic of ARD and

    AMD, respectively. It is recommended for the

    study area, to make physical and geotechnical

    tests in soil and tailings samples, in order todesign and to place an impermeable covering on

    the surface of the tailings pile, to avoid the

    diffusion of the oxygen and rainwater across

    tailings, the principal factors that trigger the

    oxidation of sulfides. This remediation measure

    will only control the AMD, but it is not possible

    that controls the ARD.

    Acknowledgement

    The authors thanks to an anonymous reviewer for

    the help in the improvement of this paper.

    References

    Alpers C.N. and Blowes D. (Eds.) (1994)

    Environmental geochemistry of sulfide

    oxidation. Boca Raton:ACS Symposium.

    Appelo C.A.J. and Postma D. (1999)

    Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution.

    Rotterdam: Balkema.

    Edet A.E., Merkel B. J. and Offiong O. E. (2004

    Contamination risk assessment of fres

    groundwater using the distribution and chemica

    speciation of some potentially toxic elements i

    Calabar (southern Nigeria). Environmenta

    Geology, 45: 1025-1035.Kimball B.A. (1999): Seasonal variation in meta

    concentrations in a stream affected by acid min

    drainage, St. Kevin Gulch, Colorado. In

    Filipek, L.H., Plumlee G.S. (Eds.), Th

    Environmental Geochemistry of Miner

    Deposits. Part B: Case Studies and Researc

    Topics. Reviews in Economic Geology, vol. 6B

    Society of Economic Geologists, Littleton, CO

    467-477.

    Kim J.J., Kim S.J., Tazaki K. (2002Mineralogical characterization of microbia

    ferrihydrite and schwertmannite, and non

    biogenic Al-sulfate precipitates from aci

    drainage in the Donghae mine area, Korea

    Environmental Geology, 42: 19-31.

    Kumpulainen S., Carlson L., Risnen M.L

    (2007): Seasonal variations of ochreou

    precipitates in mine effluents in Finland

    Applied Geochemistry, 22: 760-777.

    Lizrraga-Mendiola L., Gonzlez-Sandoval M.RDurn-Domnguez M.C. & Mrquez C. (2008

    Geochemical behavior in a Zn-Pb-Cu minin

    area in the State of Mexico (Central Mexico

    Environmental Monitoring and Assessmen

    Vol. 155(1): 355-372. DOI 10.1007/s10661

    008-0440-1. ISSN 0167-6369 (Printed), 1573

    2959 (Online).

    Parkhurst, D.L. Appelo, C.A.J. (1999): User

    Guide to PHREEQC (Version 2)-A compute

    program for speciation, batch-reaction, one

    dimensional transport, and inverse geochemica

    calculations. Water Resources Investigation

    Report 99-4259.

    Schroth A.W., Parnell Jr. R.A. (2005): Trac

    metal retention through the schwertmannite t

    goethite transformation as observed in a fiel

    settings, Alta Mine, MT. Applied Geochemistry

    20: 907-917.

    Seiler R. L., Stollenwerk K. G., Garbarino J. R

    (2005): Factors controlling tungste

    Mendiola et al. 52

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    25/118

    526 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 2010, New Delhi, India

    concentrations in ground water, Carson Desert,

    Nevada.Applied Geochemistry,20: 423-441.

    Sracek O., Bhattacharya P., Jacks G., Gustafsson

    J. P., von Brmssen M. (2004): Behavior of

    arsenic and geochemical modeling of arsenic

    enrichment in aqueous environments. Applie

    Geochemistry, 19: 169-180.

    Yu J.Y., Heo B. (2001): Dilution and removal o

    dissolved metals from acid mine drainage alon

    Imgok Creek, Korea.Applied Geochemistry, 16

    1041-1053.

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    26/118

    ABSTRACT The slope stability analysis of lined waste containment system embankment is done usingwedge analysis to find out the minimum factor of safety and the critical surface. The above procedure can bedone by trial and error or by using the concept of optimization problem. Nevertheless, for design of

    embankment of waste containment system, use of very elaborate optimization method is not required.Keeping this in view, in this paper a spread sheet based optimization tool has been used to select the critical

    failure surface and the minimum factor of safety.

    INTRODUCTIONThe stability of slopes of waste containment

    systems is one of the most important parameter for

    the design of waste containment system, like

    hydraulic conductivity of clay liner (Sharma &

    Reddy 2004). The stability of slopes needs to be

    considered both for with and without seismic

    condition. The observation of down-slope

    movement in landfills during the Loma Prieta

    (1989), Northridge (1994), and Nisqually (2001)

    earthquakes is of major concern for the design of

    waste containment system. The factor of safety of

    1.5 is considered without seismic load and withseismic load FOS of 1.1 is found to be satisfactory.

    Though different dynamic analysis are also in use

    for the analysis and design of slope of waste

    containment system, limit equilibrium method

    using pseudo-static is still most popular due to its

    simplicity and reliability. As limit equilibrium

    method does not consider the magnitude of the

    displacement of the slope, the method cannot find

    out the structural failure due to sum of all

    displacements. However, it is assumed that takinga FOS of 1.1, provides a degree of certainty that

    slope is sufficiently stable and permanen

    displacement will not occur as the yiel

    acceleration will not exceed. If the FOS is les

    than 1.0, then seismic deformation analysis will b

    required to find out the permanent deformation.

    The commonly used limit equilibrium methods ar

    an upper bound type of solution as per lim

    analysis. In the stability analysis of slopes, it

    usual to assume that for practical purposes th

    problem can be considered as two dimensional. I

    the limit equilibrium method only the concept o

    statics is applied. Slope stability problem

    however is in general statically indeterminate. A

    a result, some simplifying assumptions are to b

    made so that unique factor of safety can b

    evaluated. The differences between various limequilibrium methods of analysis relate to th

    assumptions that are made in order to achiev

    statically determinacy and the particula

    conditions of equilibrium that are satisfied. Th

    shape of the potential slip surface may be qui

    irregular depending on the homogeneity of th

    slope material. This is particularly true in natur

    slopes where joints and fractures dictate th

    locations of the failure surface. If some planes o

    weakness exist, most critical slip surface wiprobably be a series of planes passing through th

    Slope Stability Analysis of Lined Waste Containment System

    Embankment Using A Simple Optimization Tool

    SARAT KUMAR DAS

    National Institute of Technology Rourkela, India ([email protected])

    Manas Ranjan Das

    ITER, SOA University, Bhubaneswar, India ([email protected])Rajanikanta Biswal

    School of Technology, KIIT University, India ([email protected])

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    27/118

    528 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 2010, New Delhi, India

    weak strata. In some cases, a combination of plane,

    cylindrical, and other irregular failure surfaces

    may also exist (Huang, 1983).

    The slope stability analysis of lined waste

    containment system embankment are done using

    wedge analysis, mostly with single or two wedgeto find out the minimum factor of safety and the

    critical surface. The above procedure can be done

    by trial and error or by using the concept of

    optimization problem. The analysis of the

    optimization problem can be considered in two

    stages: (i) development of objective function and

    (ii) application of suitable optimization technique

    in solving the objective function. Although the

    optimization techniques in geotechnical

    engineering is being used since 1960s still it isbeing used in large offices and projects due to

    expensive software and the skill required for the

    same. However, it is important that the

    optimization schemes should be affordable and

    simple to be followed by the professional

    engineers. Nevertheless, for design of

    embankment of waste containment system, use of

    very elaborate optimization method is not required.

    Keeping this in view, in this paper a three wedge

    failure surface is considered and a spread sheetbased optimization tool has been used to select the

    critical failure surface and the minimum factor of

    safety. Charts for factor of safety based on the

    above parameters have been presented for ready

    references.

    METHODOLOGY

    The development of limit equilibrium as

    optimization problem is straight forward,

    consisting of (i) development of objective function

    and (ii) selection of optimization technique.

    Development of objective function is based on

    different stability analysis method and shape

    (circular, wedge and noncircular) of the sliding

    mass the slope. In design, the shape of the

    unknown slip surface is generally assumed while

    the location is determined by some trial and error

    procedure. The wedge type of slip surface is more

    appropriate for slopes, where critical potential slip

    surface includes a relatively long linear segment

    through a weak material bounded by stronger

    material. A relatively strong levee embankmen

    founded on weaker, stratified alluvial soils and th

    cover to a lined waste containment system ar

    common example of such slopes (Huang 1983).

    Development of objective function

    In the present study, the three-wedge method fostability analysis of slopes (Huang, 1983) is use

    for the development of objective function. This

    a force equilibrium method and development o

    the equations used for the analysis is described i

    details in Huang (1983). Figure 1 shows a typic

    geometry for the three-wedge slope failure.

    consists of active wedge, passive wedge and

    central wedge. Figure 2 shows the free bod

    diagram for the three wedge method.

    Figure 1Typical three-wedge failure surface of a slop

    Figure 2 The free-body diagram for three-wedge

    method

    The details about the formulation and th

    governing equations have been elaborated i

    Huang (1983) and Das (2005). The optimizatio

    method may be described as finding out th

    minimum factor safety which in mathematic

    programming form it can be written as:

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    28/118

    MinF:Subjected to

    .033cos3

    sincos3sin3cos)21(

    WsCT

    WurNdPP

    (1)

    The variables (design vectors) are l1, l2, l3,

    and F and the application dependant

    input parameters are slope angle (),cohesion(ci),height of slope (H), angle of internal friction

    (pore pressure parameter(ru) and seismicacceleration coefficientCs..As per physically condition it is found that the

    direction of the Ti should be positive (Huang,1983), and the kinematical conditions are applied

    for the geometry of the failure surface. tan/3cos32cos21cos1 Hlll (2)

    Hlll 3sin32sin21sin1 (3) 1 (4)

    Ti 0.0; i= 1,2,3 (5)

    The above optimization problem is implemented

    using solver of MS Excel. Figure 3 shows the pre-

    processing with necessary inputs/ parameters for

    the slope and optimization box in the inset. Thetarget cell to be minimized is selected in Set

    Target Cell, then it is clicked for Min, the

    variable like the geometry of length and angle ofwedges are selected for Guess. The necessary

    constraints are added one by one by the command

    Add and then it is clicked Solve to find out theoptimum value.

    Fig.3 Optimization model using Microsoft Excel

    showing the pre-processing

    Figure 4 shows the optimized value with the

    window Solver Results in the inset. The

    sensitivity analysis results also can be displaye

    by the command sensitivity

    Fig.4 Optimization model using Microsoft Exc

    showing the optimized values

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe three wedge stability analysis ar

    implemented for different example problems usin

    the above methodology. Table 1 presents

    comparison of the results of a slope with heigh

    12m, cohesion c 15kN/m2, slope angle 450 an

    angle of internal friction () as 250 using genet

    algorithm (Das 2005) and present method. It ca

    be seen that results are comparable with seism

    case and more for without seismic coefficien

    This variation is expected as a generalized reduce

    gradient optimization algorithm used in MSExc

    is a initial point dependent (Deb 1995).

    TABLE 1 Comparison of factor of safety (FOS

    using GA and the present method

    Examples Cs FOS

    using

    GA

    FOS

    (Present

    method)

    1 0.00 1.202 1.552

    2 0.10 1.060 1.066

    3 0.16 1.000 1.000

    The method is applied to other examples wit

    seismic coefficient (Cs) values of 0.1, 0.16, 0.2

    and 0.32 keeping in mind the seismic coefficien

    for corresponding to earthquake zones, II, III, I

    and V as per Indian standard for Earth quak

    design of structure IS: 1893(2002).

    Das, Das and Biswal 52

    (For colour figure, refer to CD)

    (For colour figure, refer to CD)

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    29/118

    530 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 2010, New Delhi, India

    Fig.5 Variation of factor of safety with C/H for

    different seismic zones of India.

    Figure 5 shows the variation of FOS with C/H

    for different seismic coefficient (zones), for a

    slope angle of 300and value of 300. As expected

    with increase in C/H the FOS increases anddecreases with increase in Cs values. Similar

    charts can be prepared for other values of slope

    angle and values. As discussed previously the

    FOS should be more than 1.1 with seismic loads,

    it was observed that all the slopes with C/H >

    0.1 are safe.

    Fig.6 Variation of factor of safety with slope angle ()

    for different seismic zones of India.

    Similarly for C/H, the variation of FOS with

    different slope angle in different seismic zone is

    shown in Fig. 6. As expected the FOS decreases

    with increases in slope angle and seismic

    coefficient. So a design office can generate such

    ready to use charts for most possible cases of

    C/H, and .

    CONCLUSIONS

    This paper presents determination of factor o

    safety of slopes of waste containment system

    using three wedge method in conjunction with

    simple optimization tool based on spread shee

    based software. It was found that the method

    efficient in finding out the factor of safety witgood precision. Few charts are presented to fin

    out the factor of safety for different seismic zone

    of India.

    REFERENCES

    Das S.K. (2005) Slope stability analysis usin

    genetic algorithm Electronic Journal geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 1.

    Deb K. (1995) Optimization for EngineerinDesign Algorithms and Examples, PrenticHall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi,.

    Huang Y.H. (1983) Stability analysis of slopeVan Nostrand Reinhold Company, USA.

    IS 1893: 2002 Criteria for earthquake resistadesign of structures: Part1 general provisionand buildings, Bureau of Indian Standards NeDelhi, India.

    Jade S. and K.D. Shanker (1995) Modelling slope failure using a global optimizatiotechnique, Engineering Optimization, Vol. 2No.2, pp. 255-266.

    Sharma, H.D. and Reddy K.R.(200

    Geoenvironmental Engineering: SiRemediation, Waste Containment and EmerginWaste Management Technologies, John Wile& Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    30/118

    Gainful Use of Solid Industrial Wastes as Resource Geo-Material for

    Embankment Construction

    A.Ghsoh

    Scientist, Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee, Uttarkhand, India,([email protected])

    S.K.JainScientist, Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee, Uttarkhand, India,([email protected])

    Dalip KumarTechnical officer, Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee, Uttarkhand, India,([email protected])

    Anand Singh Kalura and Shaifaly SharmaProj. asstt. Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee, Uttarkhand, India,

    ([email protected])

    ABSTRACT Amongst the various solid industrial wastes Ash, and Redmud are generated in huge

    quantities. Ash generally is mixed with water and is discharged in the form of slurry in the settlingpond. The waste settles through the sedimentation process in the pond. The excess water isdecanted out of the pond and recycled. Red mud is disposed off through dumpers in the red mud

    pond which flows like a viscous fluid by gravity in the pond. Investigations were carried out toexplore the possibility of utilising these wastes as resource geo-material for civil engineering

    constructions. In this paper utilisation of ash, and red mud has been discussed.

    INTRODUCTION

    With the industrialisation the country is producinga variety of waste materials which are rejected by

    the industries due to the lack of proper utilizationtechnology. Two major wastes e.g Ash from thethermal power plant and Redmud from the

    aluminum plant has been gainfully utilized for civil

    engineering construction purposes. The utilizationis briefly described below.

    ASH UTILISATIONGeneration of ever increasing quantities of ash, as a

    result of combustion of coal, poses serious threat tothe eco-system. Dumping, disposal and utilisationof growing tonnage of this waste from thermal

    power plants, commonly known as Flyash, is achallenging task particularly as not more than 5

    percent of it has been put to gainful use in thecountry till 1993 94 which was increased to 15%

    as result of concerted efforts [Kumar et al (2001)].Recently due to the use of flyash to produce PPC

    the utilisation of ash has gone up to nearly 30%

    However for civil engineering purposes ash coube used as:

    1. Backfill material2. Material for construction of embankme

    or road etc

    3. Abandoned ash pond could be reclaimfor human habitation purposes.

    Reclamation Of Abandoned Ponds For Huma

    SettlementsMost of the flyash is disposed off in special

    designed ash ponds, which are subsequentabandoned. This has resulted in the growth ofnumber of ash ponds in the vicinity of therm

    power plants and in some cases close to urbsettlements. According to a recent estimate, ov

    1,00,000 acres of land is required for flyadumping over a span of 30 years to cope with t

    present flyash generation rate of 110 million toannually.

    A.Ghosh

  • 7/26/2019 3-Slurry Ponds, Ash, Tailings and Dredged Sediments

    31/118

    532 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 2010, New Delhi, India

    Previous workAbandoned flyash ponds have no monetary value.In view of the urban sprawl, several of these

    abandoned pond sites have adequate potential fordevelopment for human habitation. Such approachwould also bring about an overall development of

    the area with added advantages of conservation ofland resources and abatement of pollution hazards.

    It is reported that Ballisager et al

    (1981),Havukainen (1983), Ueshita et al (1990)flyash ponds have been used for various uses like

    parking lots, grazing fields, play grounds includinggolf courses, picnic spots etc. However, practicallyno example is known to exist indicating the

    reclamation of flyash disposal sites for humansettlement. In India, isolated examples are

    available where attempts have been made for theconstruction of small structures over ash fills.Aforestation has also been attempted over such fills

    to develop green belt.

    Demonstration siteCouple of abandoned ash ponds were visited anddiscussions were held with owner of such ponds.Finally, for the construction of demonstration

    dwelling units abandoned ash pond at National

    Fertilisers Ltd, Panipat was selected.

    Methodology

    Samples of flyash from different profiles andlocations from the site were collected for laboratory

    evaluation.

    (a) Laboratory study- Engineering Properties

    Direct shear test

    Grain size analysis test

    Proctor density test Attreberg's Limit test

    (b) Field study

    The exploration program comprising of thfollowing activities were drawn and executed:

    Boring through the entire depth of flya

    plus about 3m in the virgin soil.

    Standard Penetration Test. Dynamic Cone Penetration Test.

    Open pit excavation. Plate Load Test. Full scale foundation test.

    Studies for spatial variability

    Panipat Ash Pond Site Field Tests

    Three Dynamic Cone Penetration Tests (DCPTwere carried out. The minimum and maximuvalue of the same varies between 3 to 15