3 lasop case 3 2006.ppt [read-only]lasop.com/pgs/hdouts/2006-03_case3.pdfmeningioma (who grade ii)...
TRANSCRIPT
Case 3
Gregory Pinsky, MD, PhDSouthern California Permanente
Medical Group
Case History
• 44 years old female presented in ER with severe headache. CT was ordered.
CT-scan (no contrast)
CT-scan (no contrast)
• Frontal lobe mass with associated edema
Surgery
• Tumor resection was performed
H&E SECTIONS
Histological findings
• Histologically, tumor is characterized by cells with elongated processes and by a loose myxoid background, giving the appearance of many microcysts.
• Pleomorphic cells focally evident• The tumor show foci of typical
meningothelial whorls.
Differential Diagnosis
• Meningioma (if any – what type?)• Glial neoplasm• ????
Immunohistochemistry
• EMA• GFAP• Cytokeratin
Cytokeratin
GFAP
GBM
GFAP
GBM
GFAP
• NEGATIVE IN TUMOR CELLS
EMA
Diagnosis: Microcystic Meningioma (WHO grade 1)
Microcystic meningioma
• Distinctive subtype of meningioma• Must be differentiated from chordoid
meningioma (WHO grade II)• Microcystic gliomas• Hemangioblastomas• Myxoid schwannomas
Microcystic meningioma• Microcystic meningiomas have occasionally
been designated as "humid" meningiomas because of the soft, moist appearing cut surface. Microscopically they contain myriads of intracellular and intercellular spaces that are filled with fluid having a low protein content. Their behavior is similar to other benign meningiomas; however, the unusual histological appearance can lead to confusion with glial neoplasms. The meningeal nature of these tumors can be confirmed with immunostaining for epithelial membrane antigen. Vessels in these neoplasms may be markedly thickened.