3-1 © 2009 the mcgraw-hill companies, inc. all rights reserved

40
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin The Reporting Entity and Consolidated Financial Statements 3

Upload: ellena98

Post on 06-May-2015

1.360 views

Category:

Economy & Finance


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

The Reporting Entity and

Consolidated Financial

Statements

3

Page 2: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-2

Consolidated Financial Statements

• Consolidated financial statements present the financial position and results of operations for a parent (controlling entity) and one or more subsidiaries (controlled entities) as if the individual entities actually were a single company or entity.

Page 3: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-3

Consolidated Financial Statements

• Consolidation is required when a corporation owns a majority of another corporation’s outstanding common stock and occasionally under other circumstances.

• Two companies are considered to be related when one controls the other or both are under the common control of another entity.

• The same accounting principles should be applied in preparing consolidated financial statements as in preparing separate-company financial statements.

• More useful than the separate financial statements of the individual companies when the companies are related.

Page 4: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-4

Benefits of Consolidated Financial Statements

• Presented primarily for those parties having a long-run interest in the parent company, including its management, shareholders, long-term creditors or other resource providers.

• Often provide the only means of obtaining a clear picture of the total resources of the combined entity that are under the parent's control.

Page 5: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-5

Limitations of Consolidated Financial Statements

• Results of individual companies included in the consolidation are not disclosed, thereby hiding poor performance.

• Not all the consolidated retained earnings balance is necessarily available for dividends of the parent.

• Financial ratios are not necessarily representative of any single company in the consolidation.

Page 6: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-6

Limitations of Consolidated Financial Statements

• Similar accounts of different companies that are combined in the consolidation may not be entirely comparable.

• Additional information about companies may be needed for a fair presentation, thus requiring voluminous footnotes.

• Information is lost any time data sets are aggregated.

Page 7: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-7

Subsidiary Financial Statements

• Creditors, preferred stockholders, and noncontrolling common stockholders of subsidiaries are most interested in the separate financial statements of the subsidiaries in which they have an interest.

• Because subsidiaries are legally separate from their parents, the creditors and stockholders of a subsidiary generally have no claim on the parent, and the stockholders of the subsidiary do not share in the profits of the parent.

Page 8: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-8

Concepts and Standards

• Professional guidance is provided in ARB 51, FASB 94, and FASB 160.

• Traditional view of control– ARB 51 indicates that consolidated financial

statements normally are appropriate for a group of companies when one company “has a controlling financial interest in the other companies.”

– FASB 94 requires consolidation of all majority-owned subsidiaries unless the parent is unable to exercise control.

Page 9: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-9

Concepts and Standards

• Less Than Majority Ownership – A company may be able to direct the operating and

financing policies of another with less than majority ownership.

– FASB 94 does not preclude consolidation with less than majority ownership, but such consolidations have seldom been found in practice.

– FASB 141R indicates that control can be obtained without majority ownership of a company’s common stock.

Page 10: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-10

Concepts and Standards

• Traditional view of control includes:– Direct control that occurs when one

company owns a majority of another company’s common stock.

– Indirect control or pyramiding that occurs when a company’s common stock is owned by one or more other companies that are all under common control.

Page 11: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-11

Concepts and Standards

• Ability to Exercise Control– Sometimes, majority stockholders may not be

able to exercise control even though they hold more than 50 percent of outstanding voting stock.

• Subsidiary is in legal reorganization or bankruptcy• Foreign country restricts remittance of subsidiary

profits to domestic parent company

– The unconsolidated subsidiary is reported as an intercorporate investment.

Page 12: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-12

Concepts and Standards

• Differences in Fiscal Periods – Difference in the fiscal periods of a parent and

subsidiary should not preclude consolidation.– Often the fiscal period of the subsidiary is

changed to coincide with that of the parent.– Another alternative is to adjust the financial

statement data of the subsidiary each period to place the data on a basis consistent with the fiscal period of the parent.

Page 13: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-13

Concepts and Standards

• Changing Concept of the Reporting Entity– FASB 94, requiring consolidation of all majority-

owned subsidiaries, was issued to eliminate the inconsistencies found in practice until a more comprehensive standard could be issued.

– Completion of the FASB’s consolidation project has been hampered by, among other things, issues related to:

• Control• Reporting entity

Page 14: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-14

Concepts and Standards

• FASB has been attempting to move toward a consolidation requirement for entities under effective control. – Ability to direct the policies of another entity even

though majority ownership is lacking.– Even though FASB 141R indicates that control can

be achieved without majority ownership, a comprehensive consolidation policy has yet to be achieved.

Page 15: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-15

Concepts and Standards

• Defining the accounting entity would help resolve the issue of when to prepare consolidated financial statements and what entities should be included.

• FASB 160 deals only with selected issues related to consolidated financial statements, leaving a comprehensive consolidation policy until a later time.

Page 16: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-16

Consolidation Process- Overview

• Starting point: Separate financial statements of the companies involved.

• Separate statements are added together, after some adjustments and eliminations, to generate consolidated statements. – Adjustments and eliminations relate

to intercompany transactions and

holdings.

Parent

Subsidiary

Consolidated Entity

Page 17: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-17

Consolidation Process

• Intercorporate Stockholdings– Common stock of the parent is held by

those outside the consolidated entity and

is viewed as the common stock

of the entire entity.

– Common stock of the subsidiary is held entirely within the consolidated entity and is not stock outstanding from a consolidated viewpoint.

– Note: A company cannot report in its financial statements an investment in itself

Page 18: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-18

Consolidation Process

• Intercorporate Stockholdings– Parent’s retained earnings (less the

unrealized intercompany profit) remains

as the only retained earnings figure

in the consolidated balance sheet.

Parent

Subsidiary

Subsidiary’scommonstock

Parent’scommon

stock

Consolidated Entity

Page 19: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-19

Consolidation Process

• Intercompany Receivables and Payables– A single company cannot owe itself money,

that is, a company cannot report (in its financial statements) a receivable to itself and a payable to itself.

– Therefore, an intercompany receivable/payable is eliminated

from both receivables and payables in preparing the consolidated balance sheet.

Parent

Subsidiary

Intercompanyreceivable/payable

Consolidated Entity

Page 20: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-20

Consolidation Process

• Intercompany Sales– The sale should be removed from the

combined revenues because it does not represent a sale to an external party.

• Remaining inventory must be restated to its original cost to the consolidated

entity (transferring affiliate).Parent

Subsidiary

Cost of goods

Consolidated Entity

Sales

Page 21: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-21

Consolidation Process

• Difference between Fair Value and Book Value– Fair value of the consideration given usually

reflects the fair value of the acquired company and differs from its book value.

– An acquiree’s assets and liabilities must be valued based on their acquisition-date fair values, and any excess of the consideration given over the fair values of the net assets is considered goodwill.

Page 22: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-22

Consolidation Process

• Single-Entity Viewpoint– To understand the adjustments needed, one

should focus on: 1. identifying the treatment accorded a particular

item by each of the separate companies and

2. identifying the amount that would appear in the financial statements with respect to that item if the consolidated entity were actually a single company.

Page 23: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-23

Mechanics of the Consolidation Process

• A worksheet is used to facilitate the process of combining and adjusting the account balances involved in a consolidation.

• While the parent company and the subsidiary each maintain their own books, there are no books for the consolidated entity.

• The balances of the accounts are taken at the end of each period from the books of the parent and the subsidiary and entered in the consolidation workpaper.

Page 24: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-24

Mechanics of the Consolidation Process

• Where the simple adding of the amounts from the two companies leads to a consolidated figure different from the amount that would appear if the two companies were actually one, the combined amount must be adjusted to the desired figure.

• This is done through the preparation of eliminating entries.

Page 25: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-25

Noncontrolling Interest

• For the parent to consolidate the subsidiary, only a controlling interest is needed—not 100% interest.

• Those shareholders of the subsidiary other than the parent are referred to as “noncontrolling” or “minority” shareholders.

• Noncontrolling interest or minority interest refers to the claim of these shareholders on the income and net assets of the subsidiary.

Page 26: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-26

Noncontrolling Interest

• Computation of income to the noncontrolling interest: In uncomplicated situations, it is a simple proportionate share of the subsidiary’s net income.

• Presentation: FASB 160 requires that the term “consolidated net income” be applied to the income available to all stockholders, with the allocation of that income between the controlling and noncontrolling stockholders shown.

Page 27: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-27

Noncontrolling Interest

• The noncontrolling interest’s claim on the net assets of the subsidiary was previously shown between liabilities and stockholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheet. – Some firms reported minority interest as a liability,

although it did not meet the definition of a liability.

• FASB 160 makes clear that the noncontrolling interest’s claim on net assets is an element of equity, not a liability.

Page 28: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-28

Combined Financial Statements

• Financial statements are also prepared for a group of companies when no one company in the group owns a majority of the common stock of any other company in the group.

• Combined financial statements are those that include a group of related companies without including the parent company or other owner.– Procedures are essentially the same as those used in

preparing consolidated financial statements.

Page 29: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-29

Special Purpose Entities

• Corporations, trusts, or partnerships created for a single specified purpose.

• Usually have no substantive operations and are used only for financing purposes.

• Used for several decades for asset securitization, risk sharing, and taking advantage of tax statutes.

Page 30: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-30

Special Purpose Entities

• Qualifying SPEs– Types of SPEs widely used for servicing

financial assets and meet very restrictive conditions established by FASB 140.

– Conditions generally require that the SPE be “demonstrably distinct from the transferor,” its activities be significantly limited, and it hold only certain types of financial assets.

Page 31: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-31

Variable Interest Entities

• A legal structure used for business purposes, usually a corporation, trust, or partnership, that either: – Does not have equity investors that have

voting rights and share in all profits and losses of the entity.

– Has equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources to support the entity’s activities.

Page 32: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-32

Variable Interest Entities

• FIN 46 (an interpretation of ARB 51) uses the term variable interest entities to encompass SPEs and other entities falling within its conditions.– Does not apply to entities that are considered SPEs

under FASB 140.• FIN 46R defines a variable interest in a VIE as a

contractual, ownership (with or without voting rights), or other money-related interest in an entity that changes with changes in the fair value of the entity’s net assets exclusive of variable interests.

Page 33: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-33

Different Approaches to Consolidation

• Theories that might serve as a basis for preparing consolidated financial statements:– Proprietary theory– Parent company theory– Entity theory

• With the issuance of FASB 141R, the FASB’s approach to consolidation has moved very much toward the entity theory.

Page 34: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-34

Recognition of Subsidiary Income

Page 35: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-35

Proprietary Theory

• Views the firm as an extension of its owners.

• Assets and liabilities of the firm are considered to be those of the owners.

• Results in a pro rata consolidation where the parent consolidates only its proportionate share of a less-than-wholly owned subsidiary’s assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.

Page 36: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-36

Parent Company Theory

• Recognizes that though the parent does not have direct ownership or responsibility, it has the ability to exercise effective control over all of the subsidiary’s assets and liabilities, not simply a proportionate share.

• Separate recognition is given, in the consolidated financial statements, to the noncontrolling interest’s claim on the net assets and earnings of the subsidiary.

Page 37: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-37

Entity Theory

• Focuses on the firm as a separate economic entity, rather than on the ownership rights of the shareholders.

• Emphasis is on the consolidated entity itself, with the controlling and noncontrolling shareholders viewed as two separate groups, each having an equity in the consolidated entity.

Page 38: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-38

Entity Theory

• All of the assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses of a less-than-wholly owned subsidiary are included in the consolidated financial statements, with no special treatment accorded either the controlling or noncontrolling interest.

Page 39: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-39

Current Practice

• FASB 141R has significantly changed the preparation of consolidated financial statements subsequent to the acquisition of less-than-wholly owned subsidiaries.– Under FASB 141R consolidation follows

largely an entity-theory approach. – Accordingly, the full entity fair value increment

and the full amount of goodwill are recognized.

Page 40: 3-1 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

3-40

Current Practice

• Current approach clearly follows the entity theory with minor modifications aimed at the practical reality that consolidated financial statements are used primarily by those having a long-run interest in the parent company.