2.ijaest vol no 7 issue no 2 design of distribution network of water supply for kudwa and 178 196

8/6/2019 2.Ijaest Vol No 7 Issue No 2 Design of Distribution Network of Water Supply for Kudwa and 178 196

1/19

DESIGN OF DISTRIBUTION NETWORK OF

WATER SUPPLY FOR KUDWA AND

KATANGI-KALA VILLAGES

Niklesh R. Murekar Isha Khedikar

M.Tech. student, IV sem. Environmental Engg. Assistant Prof. Civil Engg.

G.H.Raisoni College of Engg. Nagpur India. G. H. Raisoni College of Engg. Nagpur India

E mail:- [email protected] E mail:- [email protected]

ABSTRACT

In present study Kudwa and Katangi-kala villages Water Distribution Network (WDN) was

designed which were located at district Gondia, State Maharashtra, India. For the design of

Kudwa and Katangi-kala water distribution network study of present population, forecast

population for the three decade, daily water demand, flow and also survey of both the villages

were done with the help of DGPS (Digital Global Positioning System). From the survey a road

map was created and also elevations, length of both the villages were calculated. The flow was

calculated to the help of elevation and length. The node no. and pipe no. was denoted on the roadmap of both the villages. Water Distribution Network of both the villages was designed with the

help of branch and loop software and compared with manually result. It was found that software

result were more accurate , save time and manpower than manual result.

Key words: Branch and Loop software, Water Distribution Network, DGPS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 History of Water Distribution

Network

The most extensive water distribution

systems in ancient times were the roman

aqueducts, which conveyed water long

distances by mean of gravity through a

collection of open and closed conduits. The

first aqueduct was built in 312 B.C., and

several more were added over the centuries.

Niklesh R. Murekar* et al. / (IJAEST) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ENGINEERING SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES

Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 178 - 196

ISSN: 2230-7818 @ 2011 http://www.ijaest.iserp.org. All rights Reserved. Page 10


2/19

The Roman also Introduced lead pressure

pipe. While complex water distribution

systems were not common in the middle

ages, systems of channels were constructed

to move water from the well source in and

out of castles. leats in England are still

existing today.

1.2 Water Distribution Netwok

Water distribution network consist of a

planar system of pipes or links (through

which the water flow), connected together at

nodes which may be at different elevation.

In general, the complex will also include

pumps, reservoirs and valves. A node

usually has one of the two main functions; it

either receives a supply for the system or it

delivers the demand required by consumers.

As a special case, it may satisfy neither of

these requirements but merely serve as a

junction between two or more pipes. The

pressure head at a supply node is established

by the presence of a pump or a reservoir.

Resistances to flow (friction losses) which

are the function of length, diameter, flow

rate, and pipe material and roughness occur

in the links as the fluid water around the

network from supply nodes to demand

nodes. The effect of minor losses may be

including as equivalent pipe lengths. It is

usual to specify a minimum acceptable

residual pressure head at demand nodes and

the pressure heads at supply nodes must be

of sufficient magnitude to satisfy these

requirements. The difference between the

total heads (measured with reference to a

common horizontal datum) at a supply node

and a demand node is equal to the algebraic

sum of the head losses taken along any path

in the network.

There are two type of Water Distribution

Network.

1. Branch Network2. Loop Network

In Loop software, Loop simulates the

hydraulic characteristics of a pressurized,

looped (close circuit) water distribution

network. The network is characterized by

pipes and nodes (points of inputs /demand or

pipe junction). Data required are the

description of the elements of the network

such as pipe length, diameter, friction

coefficient, nodal demand and ground

elevation, and data describing the geometry

of the network. The program outputs include

flows and velocities in the link and pressuresat the nodes. It does not accommodate inline

booster pumps and pressure reducing valves.

Loop 4.0 handles up to 1000 pipes and can

simulate up to 10 nodes with known


Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 178 - 196



3/19

hydraulic grade lines (e.g. storage

reservoirs).

In Branch software, Branch is used to

design pressurized, branched (tree-type,

non-looped) water distribution networks by

choosing from among a set of candidate

diameters for each pipeline so that the total

cost of the network is minimized subject to

meeting certain design constraints. Both

construction costs and the design constraints

can be expressed as linear, mathematical

statements. The network is characterized by

links (individual pipes) connected by nodes,

which are points of flow input, outflow or

pipe junctions. Version 3.0 of the software

can handle up to 125 pipes. BRANCH

formulates the linear programming model

for the least cost design, solves the model

and outputs the design as well as

corresponding hydraulic information. Data

required include description of network

elements such as pipe lengths, friction

coefficients, nodal demands and ground

elevations, data describing the geometry of

the network, the candidate diameters and

their unit costs, and system constraints

(minimum pressures, minimum and

maximum gradients). Outputs include

optimal lengths and diameters of pipes in

each link, total network costs and hydraulic

information.

1.1 Necessity of project and condition

leading to the planning of the project

These villages are 30 to 35 km from Gondia

city, Maharashtra, India. All the newly

established educational institutions are

within the vicinity of these villages. The

development is very fast and hence a new

water supply scheme is urgently needed.

Hence Water Supply Scheme for Kudwa and

Katangi-kala villages with WTP as source is

proposed along with water supply rate of 70

lpcd at consumer end for Kudwa and

Katangi-kala villages.

2.0 EXISTING WORK INFORMATION

OF KUDWA AND KATANGI-KALA

Kudwa and Katangi-kala village are in

Gondia District. Gondia town is a H.Q. of

Gondia District, it is situated on Mumbai

Howarah Broad gauge Railway Line it is

about 68 Km from Bhandara and 150 Km

from Nagpur. The population of Kudwa and

Katangi-kala villages is 9436 and 6161.

2.1 Present Water Supply Scheme and

Condition:

At present Kudwa and Katangi-kala villages

are getting water supply through individual

water supply schemes.The individual


Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 178 - 196



4/19

sources of the existing schemes are Bore

wells in village Kudwa & Katangi-kala. The

schemes were designed for the ultimate

stage for year 2004 with 40 Lpcd as rate of

water supply. These schemes are outlived

their designed life of 15 years.

2.1.1 Head Works

Intake well:-2.5 m diameter Intake well is

constructed by sinking method in the bed of

Wainganga River.

2.1.2 Connecting Main

27" (700 mm DIA) C.I. Connecting main of

37 m long connected with intake well to

twin jack well on left bank of river

Wainganga.

2.1.3 Jack Well and Pump House

Twin jack wells of 7.30 m diameter each in

circular are constructed on left bank of River

Wainganga. The depth of well is 18.50 m

below G.L. and constructed in

B.B.Masonary and R.C.C. Ring beam at

regular interval.The pump house of 18.25 m

x 7.90 m size is built up over the twin jack

well having the R.C.C. floor and 3 Sets of

pumping machinery have been installed in

it.

2.1.4 Raw Water Pumping Machinery

240 BHP VT pumps 3 sets are proposed

having discharging capacity 735000 Lph

against 121 Mtr head for each pump. 2 sets

will run at a time and one will be standby

(i.e.50% standby). Hours of pumping are 22

Hrs in ultimate stage .Existing pumps are

proposed to be replaced in the same capacity

and the discharge thereof as the existing

Raw Water R/Main is considered to be used

simultaneously.

2.1.5 Existing Raw Water Rising Main

450 mm Diameter, DI K9 Length 16250 m.

2.1.6 Water Treatment Plant

A conventional water treatment plant of

capacity 2.5 Mld is designed for immediate

stage.

2.1.7 Water Sump & Pump House

Water sump size 12 m x 12 x 5.755 m pump

house size 12.00 x 6.00 xheight 6.45 m over

the half portion of sump.

2.1.8 Water Pumping Machinery

3 Sets of V.T. pumps 90 BHP each having

discharging capacity 832840 Lit/hr against

total head of 40 m,


Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 178 - 196



5/19

2.1.9 Water Rising Main

It is proposed to existing water rising main,

along with the water pumping machinery for

existing two nos ESRs and also it is

proposed to fill up the MBR to be

constructed near WTP for ESRs by a rising

main of 450 mm dia DI K-9 pipe 100 m in

length.

2.1.10 Master Balancing Reservoir

It is proposed to construct RCC MBR near

WTP having capacity of 740000 liters

staging height 25m to supply water by

gravity to proposed ESR of Kudwa and

Katangi-kala.

2.1.11 Elevated Service Reservoirs

1) 1,00,000 Lit cap.12.0 m staging height at

ESR, at village Kudwa

2) 1,00,000 Lit cap.12.0 m staging height

ESR, at Katangi-kala.

3.0 MATERIALS AND METHODE

3.1 Data collect:-For design a water

distribution network of Kudwa and Katangi-

kala villages, the following data were

obtained from MJP (Maharashtra Jeevan

Pradhikaran).

1] Collect the population of last 6 decades of

Kudwa and Katangi-kala villages..

2] Collect the existing work data of headwork, WTP, MBR and raw water pipeline.

3] Road map of Kudwa and Katangi-kala

villages.

4] Data of previous existing water pipeline.

5] Existing location of ESR.

6] Capacity of existing ESR.


Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 178 - 196



6/19

Fig 3 - Katangi-kala Village Map with Node No., Pipe No., Length and Elevation

Fig 4 - Kudwa Village Map with Node No., Pipe No., Length and Elevation


Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 178 - 196



7/19

Fig 3 DGPS (Digital Global Positioning

System)

3.2 PROPOSED WORK INFORMATION

OF KUDWA AND KATANGI-KALA

WATER DISTRIBUTION

3.2.1 Population of Villages

On the basis of population of last 6 decades

the calculated forecast population of 2012,

2027, and 2042 of KUDWA village was

10533, 15261 and 22181 and the

KATANGI-KALA village was 6459, 9142

and 12863.

3.2.2 Daily Water Demand

The rate of water supply was 70 lpcd. The

daily requirement of water in MLD

2012 2027 2042

At Consumer

End

1.19 1.71 2.45

At Head Work 1.39 2.0 2.87

3.2.3 Water Gravity Main

It is proposed to carry water from MBR to

Two nos ESR by gravity main network

stated as below

Diameter Pipe Type Pipe Length

250 mm DI K-7 50 m

200 mm DI K-7 3950 m

150 mm DI K-7 70 m

Total

4070 m

3.2.4 Elevated Service Reservoir

The proposedESRs location and capacity

are as under;

Location

of ESR

Capacity Unit Lt. Staging

Height

Katangi -

kala

3.34 Lakhs 15 m

Kudwa 5.75 Lakhs . 15 m

3.2.5 Distribution System

The proposed was of CI pipe class. Design

the distribution network in Branch and Loop

software and also a manually. For manual


Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 178 - 196



8/19

calculation Hazen Williams formula was

used.

Pipes distribution system is given as under;

Name

of

Village

300

mm

250

mm

200

m

150

mm

100 mm Total

Length

Katangi

-kala

0 150 509 570 73568585

Kudwa 170 88 264 1803 10420

12745

Total

Length

170 238 773 373 17776

21330

Hazen Williams Head Loss formula

HEAD LOSS hf =

Where,

hf= Head loss in m

L = Length of Pipe in m

Q = Flow in m3/s

C = Friction Coefficient

D = Diameter of Pipe in m

Fig 4 - KEY PLAN OF KUDWA & KATANGI-KALA


Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 178 - 196



9/19

Fig 5 - FLOW DIAGRAM OF KUDWA & KATANGI-KALA

4.0 RESULT AND DISCUSSION

A node number and pipe number marking of

Kudwa and Katangi kala villages is

represented in Fig 1 and Fig 2. The survey

instrument DGPS (Digital Global

Positioning System) is represented in Fig

3.The presented results are based on the

Branch and Loop software and manually. It

is also based on forecast population of 2012,

2027 and 2042. The comparison of result ofBranch and Loop and manually is same. The

result of water gravity main of Branch and

Loop software and manually is same

represented in table no. 4.1 and 4.2). The

result of water distribution network of

Branch and Loop software and manually is

same of both the villages is represented in

table no. 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and 4.6). The cost ofgravity main is 11205. The cost of Kudwa

and Katangi kala village distribution cost is

58318 and 30553. This cost is given by the

software.

Branch and Loop software saves the time

and manpower and also more beneficial and

calculate the least cost of water distribution

network. The Branch and Loop software

calculation are more accurate than manual

calculation.


Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 178 - 196



10/19

Table 4.1 Result Comparison of Water Gravity Main by Software and Manual

Pipe Detail

Pipe

No.

From

Node

To

Node

Peak

Flow

Dia

(mm)

Hazens

const

HL (m) HL/1000

(m)

Length(m)

1 1 2 34.716 250 140 0.10 2.00 502 2 3 21.967 200 140 1.24 2.48 500

3 3 4 21.967 200 140 0.12 2.40 50

4 2 5 12.749 200 140 3.07 0.90 3400

5 5 6 12.749 150 140 0.26 3.71 70

Table 4.2 Manual Result of Water Gravity Main

Pipe Detail

Pipe Node GL

Initial

Flow

Peak

Flow

Cummula

-tive Peak

Flow

Cummula

-tive Peak

Flow Length Dia

Head

Loss

No. Start End Start End lps Lps lps m3/s m M M

1 1 2 315.00 315.12 0.000 0 34.716 0.0347 50 0.250 0.10

2 2 3 315.12 312.60 0.000 0 21.967 0.0220 500 0.200 1.22

3 3 4 312.60 332.63 19.970 21.967 21.967 0.0220 50 0.200 0.12

4 2 5 332.63 311.00 0.000 0 12.749 0.0127 3400 0.200 3.03

5 5 6 311.00 331.1 11.590 12.749 12.749 0.0127 70 0.150 0.25


Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 178 - 196



11/19

Result Comparison of Water Distribution of Katangi-kala village by Software and Manual

Table 4.3 Software result Table 4.4 Manual result

Pipe

No.

From

Node

To

Node

Flow

(lps)

Dia

(mm)

HL

(m)

Length

(m)

1 1 2 37.170 230 0.16 50

2 2 3 4.363 96 0.35 80

3 3 4 3.031 96 0.11 50

4 4 5 0.219 96 0.00 50

5 3 6 0.982 96 0.03 114

6 4 7 0.438 96 0.01 100

7 4 8 2.155 96 0.27 230

8 8 9 1.147 96 0.03 90

9 9 10 0.132 96 0.00 30

10 2 11 32.588 230 0.26 10

11 11 12 22.462 182 0.14 34

12 12 13 21.942 182 0.17 44

13 13 14 21.254 182 0.18 50

14 14 15 19.597 182 0.31 100

15 15 16 21.025 182 0.08 22

16 17 87 0.192 96 0.00 44

17 11 17 9.687 182 0.04 4418 17 18 5.748 134 0.05 38

19 18 19 3.099 96 0.03 14

20 19 88 3.073 96 0.07 30

21 88 20 0.210 96 0.00 48

22 6 19 0.034 96 0.00 102

23 17 21 3.555 96 0.10 34

24 18 22 2.481 96 0.05 34

25 88 23 2.731 96 0.04 24

26 12 21 0.371 96 0.00 44

27 21 22 0.665 96 0.01 38

28 23 24 0.201 96 0.00 46

29 21 25 2.919 96 0.09 44

30 22 26 2.831 96 0.09 44

31 23 27 2.425 96 0.07 46

Pipe

No.

From

Node

To

Node

Dia

(mm)

HL

(m)

1 1 2 230 0.16

2 2 3 96 0.35

3 3 4 96 0.11

4 4 5 96 0.00

5 3 6 96 0.03

6 4 7 96 0.01

7 4 8 96 0.27

8 8 9 96 0.03

9 9 10 96 0.00

10 2 11 230 0.26

11 11 12 182 0.14

12 12 13 182 0.17

13 13 14 182 0.18

14 14 15 182 0.31

15 15 16 182 0.08

16 17 87 96 0.00

17 11 17 182 0.0418 17 18 134 0.05

19 18 19 96 0.03

20 19 88 96 0.07

21 88 20 96 0.00

22 6 19 96 0.00

23 17 21 96 0.10

24 18 22 96 0.05

25 88 23 96 0.04

26 12 21 96 0.00

27 21 22 96 0.01

28 23 24 96 0.00

29 21 25 96 0.09

30 22 26 96 0.09

31 23 27 96 0.07


Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 178 - 196



12/19

32 25 13 2.652 96 0.08 44

33 25 26 0.075 96 0.00 38

34 26 27 2.546 96 0.07 46

35 27 29 4.566 96 0.20 42

36 14 28 1.437 96 0.05 88

37 29 28 1.469 96 0.03 5838 29 30 2.914 96 0.07 36

39 30 31 1.401 96 0.02 30

40 31 32 0.132 96 0.00 30

41 28 33 2.267 96 0.13 100

42 30 34 1.354 96 0.07 130

43 31 35 1.137 96 0.05 130

44 33 15 2.304 96 0.13 100

45 34 33 0.913 96 0.02 100

46 35 34 0.348 96 0.00 50

47 35 36 0.219 96 0.00 50

48 9 16 2.873 96 0.37 18449 16 37 1.227 96 0.12 280

50 16 38 21.768 182 0.09 25

51 38 39 1.227 96 0.12 280

52 38 40 20.430 182 0.64 190

53 40 41 9.860 134 0.12 30

54 41 42 9.596 134 1.26 340

55 42 43 4.798 96 0.10 20

56 43 44 4.711 96 0.45 90

57 44 45 4.441 96 0.42 94

58 45 46 3.565 96 0.42 140

59 46 47 2.237 96 0.04 30

60 47 48 0.376 96 0.00 36

61 48 49 1.366 96 0.07 142

62 49 50 0.219 96 0.00 50

63 41 51 0.132 96 0.00 30

64 40 52 9.736 134 0.62 162

65 52 54 4.547 96 0.69 146

66 52 53 4.477 96 0.69 150

67 53 54 0.174 96 0.00 100

68 53 66 3.646 96 0.31 100

69 42 55 3.307 96 0.24 9270 55 56 1.687 96 0.05 60

71 56 61 0.949 96 0.02 80

72 56 57 0.474 96 0.01 108

73 55 58 3.162 96 0.07 28

74 58 59 0.350 96 0.00 78

75 59 60 0.264 96 0.00 60

76 61 59 0.511 96 0.00 58

32 25 13 96 0.08

33 25 26 96 0.00

34 26 27 96 0.07

35 27 29 96 0.20

36 14 28 96 0.05

37 29 28 96 0.0338 29 30 96 0.07

39 30 31 96 0.02

40 31 32 96 0.00

41 28 33 96 0.13

42 30 34 96 0.06

43 31 35 96 0.05

44 33 15 96 0.11

45 34 33 96 0.02

46 35 34 96 0.00

47 35 36 96 0.00

48 9 16 96 0.37

49 16 37 96 0.12

50 16 38 182 0.09

51 38 39 96 0.12

52 38 40 182 0.64

53 40 41 134 0.12

54 41 42 134 1.26

55 42 43 96 0.10

56 43 44 96 0.45

57 44 45 96 0.42

58 45 46 96 0.4259 46 47 96 0.04

60 47 48 96 0.00

61 48 49 96 0.07

62 49 50 96 0.00

63 41 51 96 0.00

64 40 52 134 0.62

65 52 54 96 0.69

66 52 53 96 0.69

67 53 54 96 0.00

68 53 66 96 0.31

69 42 55 96 0.2470 55 56 96 0.04

71 56 61 96 0.02

72 56 57 96 0.01

73 55 58 96 0.07

74 58 59 96 0.00

75 59 60 96 0.00

76 61 59 96 0.00


Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 178 - 196



13/19

77 61 62 0.087 96 0.00 20

78 63 55 2.226 96 0.08 64

79 54 63 4.083 96 0.23 60

80 63 64 1.593 96 0.04 6081 64 65 0.132 96 0.00 30

82 64 66 1.197 96 0.04 100

83 66 67 3.967 96 0.18 50

84 58 44 2.689 96 0.25 140

85 44 68 1.952 96 0.08 84

86 68 69 0.174 96 0.00 40

87 68 70 1.409 96 0.11 210

88 67 70 3.748 96 0.33 100

89 70 71 0.219 96 0.00 50

90 45 72 0.465 96 0.01 106

91 46 73 0.712 96 0.01 8092 73 74 0.306 96 0.00 70

93 75 73 0.739 96 0.01 80

94 75 76 0.483 96 0.01 110

95 47 77 1.730 96 0.05 60

96 77 78 1.247 96 0.02 42

97 78 79 0.845 96 0.01 44

98 79 80 0.434 96 0.00 52

99 77 81 0.219 96 0.00 50

100 78 82 0.219 96 0.00 50

101 79 83 0.219 96 0.00 50

102 84 48 1.369 96 0.03 50

103 73 84 0.443 96 0.00 32

104 85 84 1.322 96 0.03 58

105 85 75 1.336 96 0.01 26

106 70 85 3.578 96 0.64 210

107 49 80 0.304 96 0.00 116

108 49 86 0.219 96 0.00 50

109 89 90 0.306 96 0.00 70

110 13 89 2.953 96 0.19 89

111 89 9 2.473 96 0.01 9

77 61 62 96 0.00

78 63 55 96 0.08

79 54 63 96 0.23

80 63 64 96 0.0481 64 65 96 0.00

82 64 66 96 0.04

83 66 67 96 0.18

84 58 44 96 0.25

85 44 68 96 0.08

86 68 69 96 0.00

87 68 70 96 0.11

88 67 70 96 0.33

89 70 71 96 0.00

90 45 72 96 0.01

91 46 73 96 0.0192 73 74 96 o.00

93 75 73 96 0.01

94 75 76 96 0.01

95 47 77 96 0.05

96 77 78 96 0.02

97 78 79 96 0.01

98 79 80 96 0.00

99 77 81 96 0.00

100 78 82 96 0.00

101 79 83 96 0.00

102 84 48 96 0.03

103 73 84 96 0.00

104 85 84 96 0.03

105 85 75 96 0.01

106 70 85 96 0.63

107 49 80 96 0.00

108 49 86 96 0.00

109 89 90 96 0.00

110 13 89 96 0.19

111 89 9 96 0.01


Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 178 - 196



14/19

Result Comparison of Water Distribution of Kudwa village by Software and Manual

Table 4.5 Software result Table 4.6 Manual result

Pipe

No.

From

Node

To

Node

Dia

(mm)

HL

(m)1 1 2 300 0.05

2 2 3 96 0.71

3 3 4 96 0.00

4 3 5 96 0.01

5 2 6 300 0.33

6 6 7 230 0.22

7 7 8 182 0.51

8 8 9 182 0.11

9 9 10 182 0.07

10 10 11 182 0.08

11 11 12 134 0.0912 12 13 134 0.08

13 13 14 96 0.18

14 14 15 96 0.14

15 15 16 96 0.06

16 16 17 96 0.15

17 17 18 96 0.08

18 9 19 134 0.07

19 19 20 134 0.04

20 20 21 134 0.06

21 19 22 96 0.0022 20 23 96 0.00

23 10 24 96 0.01

24 24 25 96 0.02

25 25 26 96 0.00

26 19 24 96 0.01

27 25 20 96 0.01

28 11 27 96 0.13

29 27 28 96 0.04

30 29 28 96 0.01

31 29 30 96 0.06

32 30 31 96 0.02

33 21 29 134 0.14

34 30 32 96 0.00

35 31 33 96 0.00

36 12 34 96 0.06

37 34 35 96 0.04

38 35 36 96 0.00

Pipe

No.

From

Node

To

Node

Flow

(lps)

Dia

(mm)

HL

(m)

Length

(m)

1 1 2 63.426 300 0.05 20

2 2 3 2.640 96 0.71 410

3 3 4 0.099 96 0.00 20

4 3 5 0.498 96 0.01 100

5 2 6 60.687 300 0.33 150

6 6 7 31.820 230 0.22 88

7 7 8 24.325 182 0.51 110

8 8 9 21.875 182 0.11 28

9 9 10 15.142 182 0.07 36

10 10 11 13.947 182 0.08 50

11 11 12 9.912 134 0.09 22

12 12 13 7.357 134 0.08 36

13 13 14 4.056 96 0.18 48

14 14 15 3.552 96 0.14 46

15 15 16 2.785 96 0.06 30

16 16 17 2.635 96 0.15 90

17 17 18 1.783 96 0.08 100

18 9 19 6.592 134 0.07 40

19 19 20 5.390 134 0.04 30

20 20 21 5.966 134 0.06 40

21 19 22 0.198 96 0.00 4022 20 23 0.198 96 0.00 40

23 10 24 1.015 96 0.01 40

24 24 25 1.421 96 0.02 30

25 25 26 0.150 96 0.00 30

26 19 24 0.806 96 0.01 40

27 25 20 1.121 96 0.01 40

28 11 27 3.786 96 0.13 40

29 27 28 2.173 96 0.04 30

30 29 28 0.802 96 0.01 30

31 29 30 2.467 96 0.06 4032 30 31 1.405 96 0.02 30

33 21 29 5.768 134 0.14 100

34 30 32 0.249 96 0.00 50

35 31 33 0.300 96 0.00 60

36 12 34 2.445 96 0.06 40

37 34 35 3.401 96 0.04 15

38 35 36 0.574 96 0.00 15


Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 178 - 196



15/19

39 36 37 0.499 96 0.00 30

40 37 38 1.900 96 0.04 40

41 38 39 1.601 96 0.02 30

42 28 38 2.825 96 0.06 30

43 29 37 1.851 96 0.03 30

44 30 38 0.615 96 0.00 3045 31 39 0.955 96 0.01 30

46 34 40 0.150 96 0.00 30

47 35 42 2.752 96 0.07 40

48 37 41 0.150 96 0.00 30

49 38 45 3.241 96 0.09 36

50 39 52 2.256 96 0.11 86

51 13 42 3.121 96 0.09 40

52 42 43 2.573 96 0.07 40

53 43 44 0.608 96 0.00 40

54 45 44 1.232 96 0.01 30

55 42 46 2.901 96 0.09 4456 43 61 1.767 96 0.03 42

57 44 49 1.492 96 0.03 42

58 45 50 1.828 96 0.04 42

59 14 46 0.264 96 0.00 42

60 46 47 0.780 96 0.01 32

61 47 48 0.621 96 0.00 15

62 49 48 0.554 96 0.00 25

63 50 49 0.365 96 0.00 25

64 50 51 1.130 96 0.00 10

65 51 52 0.199 96 0.00 25

66 52 53 0.997 96 0.00 12

67 53 54 0.069 96 0.00 40

68 46 55 1.955 96 0.05 46

69 48 56 1.100 96 0.02 46

70 49 57 0.971 96 0.01 46

71 51 58 0.880 96 0.01 42

72 52 59 0.907 96 0.01 42

73 53 60 0.868 96 0.01 42

74 61 54 0.339 96 0.00 42

75 55 15 3.245 96 0.09 36

76 56 55 1.518 96 0.02 3677 57 56 0.826 96 0.01 28

78 58 57 0.224 96 0.00 28

79 58 59 0.308 96 0.00 28

80 59 60 0.867 96 0.00 12

81 61 60 0.969 96 0.01 40

82 61 62 0.249 96 0.00 50

83 60 63 2.235 96 0.06 44

39 36 37 96 0.00

40 37 38 96 0.04

41 38 39 96 0.02

42 28 38 96 0.06

43 29 37 96 0.03

44 30 38 96 0.0045 31 39 96 0.01

46 34 40 96 0.00

47 35 42 96 0.07

48 37 41 96 0.00

49 38 45 96 0.09

50 39 52 96 0.11

51 13 42 96 0.09

52 42 43 96 0.07

53 43 44 96 0.00

54 45 44 96 0.01

55 42 46 96 0.0956 43 61 96 0.03

57 44 49 96 0.03

58 45 50 96 0.04

59 14 46 96 0.00

60 46 47 96 0.01

61 47 48 96 0.00

62 49 48 96 0.00

63 50 49 96 0.00

64 50 51 96 0.00

65 51 52 96

0.0066 52 53 96 0.00

67 53 54 96 0.00

68 46 55 96 0.05

69 48 56 96 0.02

70 49 57 96 0.01

71 51 58 96 0.01

72 52 59 96 0.01

73 53 60 96 0.01

74 61 54 96 0.00

75 55 15 96 0.09

76 56 55 96 0.0277 57 56 96 0.01

78 58 57 96 0.00

79 58 59 96 0.00

80 59 60 96 0.00

81 61 60 96 0.01

82 61 62 96 0.00

83 60 63 96 0.06


Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 178 - 196



16/19

84 63 68 1.008 96 0.01 20

85 68 70 0.475 96 0.00 26

86 63 64 1.008 96 0.01 22

87 64 65 0.487 96

0.00 3088 65 66 0.119 96 0.00 26

89 64 66 0.409 96 0.00 44

90 66 67 0.198 96 0.00 40

91 68 69 0.435 96 0.00 52

92 65 69 0.219 96 0.00 20

93 70 71 0.346 96 0.00 52

94 69 71 0.293 96 0.00 26

95 71 72 0.249 96 0.00 50

96 18 73 1.285 96 0.07 150

97 73 74 0.198 96 0.00 40

98 73 76 0.340 96 0.00 6099 17 75 0.402 96 0.00 60

100 75 76 3.457 96 0.15 53

101 15 75 3.604 96 0.21 70

102 76 77 3.233 96 0.41 165

103 77 79 0.129 96 0.00 26

104 77 78 0.639 96 0.02 128

105 77 80 1.643 96 0.02 26

106 80 81 0.180 96 0.00 36

107 80 82 1.334 96 0.02 34

108 82 83 1.163 96 0.05 127

109 83 84 0.120 96 0.00 24

110 85 83 0.160 96 0.00 114

111 86 85 0.409 96 0.00 50

112 86 87 1.179 96 0.07 176

113 89 86 3.751 96 1.43 434

114 8 89 1.901 96 0.17 186

115 90 89 3.326 96 0.29 110

116 7 90 7.048 134 0.40 190

117 90 91 2.774 96 0.06 30

118 91 92 0.597 96 0.00 30

119 92 93 0.198 96

0.00 40120 92 94 0.249 96 0.00 50

121 91 140 2.027 96 0.43 410

122 6 95 8.485 134 0.44 150

123 95 117 0.374 96 0.00 48

124 95 96 7.363 134 0.51 226

125 96 97 2.907 96 0.42 202

126 97 98 2.583 96 0.10 60

84 63 68 96 0.01

85 68 70 96 0.00

86 63 64 96 0.01

87 64 65 96

0.0088 65 66 96 0.00

89 64 66 96 0.00

90 66 67 96 0.00

91 68 69 96 0.00

92 65 69 96 0.00

93 70 71 96 0.00

94 69 71 96 0.00

95 71 72 96 0.00

96 18 73 96 0.07

97 73 74 96 0.00

98 73 76 96 0.0099 17 75 96 0.00

100 75 76 96 0.15

101 15 75 96 0.21

102 76 77 96 0.41

103 77 79 96 0.00

104 77 78 96 0.02

105 77 80 96 0.02

106 80 81 96 0.00

107 80 82 96 0.02

108 82 83 96 0.05

109 83 84 96 0.00

110 85 83 96 0.00

111 86 85 96 0.00

112 86 87 96 0.07

113 89 86 96 1.43

114 8 89 96 0.17

115 90 89 96 0.29

116 7 90 134 0.40

117 90 91 96 0.06

118 91 92 96 0.00

119 92 93 96

0.00120 92 94 96 0.00

121 91 140 96 0.43

122 6 95 134 0.44

123 95 117 96 0.00

124 95 96 134 0.51

125 96 97 96 0.41

126 97 98 96 0.10


Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 178 - 196



17/19

127 98 99 1.785 96 0.03 36

128 99 100 1.107 96 0.01 38

129 100 101 0.618 96 0.00 38

130 101 102 0.129 96

0.00 26131 98 105 0.300 96 0.00 60

132 99 106 0.300 96 0.00 60

133 100 107 0.300 96 0.00 60

134 101 108 0.300 96 0.00 60

135 98 103 0.198 96 0.00 40

136 99 104 0.198 96 0.00 40

137 109 97 0.648 96 0.01 96

138 96 109 3.329 96 0.40 152

139 109 110 1.408 96 0.03 60

140 110 111 1.158 96 0.09 232

141 112 110 0.050 96 0.00 10142 112 113 3.082 96 0.51 222

143 113 114 0.249 96 0.00 50

144 113 133 1.726 96 0.08 100

145 133 134 2.287 96 0.30 226

146 134 135 0.249 96 0.00 50

147 134 143 0.910 96 0.05 208

148 143 145 0.249 96 0.00 50

149 6 115 19.64 182 0.13 40

150 115 116 10.25 134 0.07 16

151 116 117 2.862 96 0.25 126

152 116 120 7.309 134 0.16 72

153 117 118 2.369 96 0.06 42

154 120 121 8.119 134 0.17 62

155 118 121 1.631 96 0.02 26

156 118 119 0.528 96 0.01 106

157 121 122 8.446 134 0.54 185

158 122 123 0.198 96 0.00 40

159 122 124 7.327 134 0.09 42

160 124 125 0.150 96 0.00 30

161 124 126 6.967 134 0.14 66

162 126 127 0.150 96 0.00 30163 126 128 6.487 134 0.07 40

164 128 112 3.231 96 0.03 10

165 128 129 3.058 96 0.27 120

166 115 136 9.186 134 0.20 60

167 136 120 1.389 96 0.02 44

168 136 137 7.497 134 0.20 84

169 121 137 0.666 96 0.01 40

127 98 99 96 0.03

128 99 100 96 0.01

129 100 101 96 0.00

130 101 102 96 0.00131 98 105 96 0.00

132 99 106 96 0.00

133 100 107 96 0.00

134 101 108 96 0.00

135 98 103 96 0.00

136 99 104 96 0.00

137 109 97 96 0.01

138 96 109 96 0.40

139 109 110 96 0.03

140 110 111 96 0.09

141 112 110 96 0.00142 112 113 96 0.51

143 113 114 96 0.00

144 113 133 96 0.08

145 133 134 96 0.30

146 134 135 96 0.00

147 134 143 96 0.05

148 143 145 96 0.00

149 6 115 182 0.13

150 115 116 134 0.07

151 116 117 96 0.25

152 116 120 134 0.16

153 117 118 96 0.06

154 120 121 134 0.17

155 118 121 96 0.02

156 118 119 96 0.01

157 121 122 134 0.54

158 122 123 96 0.00

159 122 124 134 0.09

160 124 125 96 0.00

161 124 126 134 0.14

162 126 127 96 0.00163 126 128 134 0.07

164 128 112 96 0.03

165 128 129 96 0.27

166 115 136 134 0.20

167 136 120 96 0.02

168 136 137 134 0.20

169 121 137 96 0.01


Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 178 - 196



18/19

REFERENCE

1) R. Banos, C. Gil, J. I. Agulleiro, andJ. Reca (2007) A Memetic

algorithms for water distribution

network design.

2) Dr. P.R. Bhave and S.D. Shangarpwarfrom IWWA march 2001 computer

aided analysis and design of water

distribution network

3) BRIAN YOUNG J. Austral. Math.Soc.Ser. B41 (2000), Analysis and

Optimization of Looped Water

Distribution Networks (Received 12

March 1997; revised 23 February

1998) pp-508-511.

4) Nemanja Trifunovic (2002) WaterDistribution.

5) Walski, Thomas M., (1990) WaterDistribution Systems: Simulation and

Sizing, Chelsea, Mi: Lewis

Publishers.

6) Walski, Thomas M., (march 2006) AHistory of Water Distribution,

Journal AWWA, Vol 98, No.3, pp-

110-111.

7) Lindell E. Ormsbee, (2006) AHistory of Water Distribution

Network Analysis: The Computer

Age, Journal of Water Distribution

Analysis Symposium, pp-1-2.

170 137 138 7.742 134 0.20 82

171 138 139 0.339 96 0.00 68

172 138 140 6.995 134 0.37 180

173 140 141 6.079 134 0.13 80174 141 129 2.578 96 0.41 246

175 129 130 3.812 96 0.24 72

176 130 131 0.348 96 0.00 70

177 130 132 3.104 96 0.06 26

178 132 133 1.398 96 0.04 68

179 132 142 1.577 96 0.12 188

180 141 142 3.102 96 0.84 360

181 142 143 1.946 96 0.26 265

182 143 144 0.249 96 0.00 50

183 27 34 1.415 96 0.01 22

184 87 88 0.300 96 0.00 60

170 137 138 134 0.20

171 138 139 96 0.00

172 138 140 134 0.37

173 140 141 134 0.13174 141 129 96 0.40

175 129 130 96 0.24

176 130 131 96 0.00

177 130 132 96 0.06

178 132 133 96 0.04

179 132 142 96 0.12

180 141 142 96 0.83

181 142 143 96 0.26

182 143 144 96 0.00

183 27 34 96 0.01

184 87 88 96 0.00


Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 178 - 196



19/19

8) Shamir U.(1968) Water DistributionSystems Analysis, Journal of the

Hydraulic Division Proceeding of the

ASCE, HY.1, 1968: pp.219-222.

9) Eiger G, Shamir U, Ben-Tal A.(1994) Opatimal Design of Water

Distribution Network Water

Resources Research, Vol. 30, No.9,

pp- 2637-2638

10) Chambers K, Creasey J and Forbes L.(2004) Design and Operation of

Distribution Network @2004 World

Health Organization. Safe Piped

Water:Managing Microbial Water

Quality in Piped Distribution

Systems. Published by IWA

Publishing. London. UK. Pp- 39-45.

11) Bhave P.R and Shangarpwar S.D.(2001) Computer Aided Analysis

and Design of Water Distribution

NetworkIWWA.

12) Lansey K. and L. Mays. (1989)Optimization Model for Water

Distribution System Design journal

Hydraul Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Engg.,

pp- 1403-1407.

13) Morgan D. and I. Goulter, (1985)Optimal Urban Water Distribution

Design. Water Resource Research,

pp- 643-644.

14) Clifford Will Project A GlobalPositioning System

15) Sujay V. Kumar and S. RanjiRanjithan (2007),Optimal Design of

Water Distribution Networks.

Journal of water resources planning

and management, Vol.133, pp 580.

16) P.R.Bhave and R.Gupta Analysis ofWater Distribution Network


Vol No. 7, Issue No. 2, 178 - 196

2.ijaest vol no 7 issue no 2 design of distribution network of water supply for kudwa and 178 196

Documents