28 th traffic records forum
DESCRIPTION
28 TH TRAFFIC RECORDS FORUM. MISSOURI STARS / TMS INTEGRATION. Missouri PAR Regulations. RSMo 43.250 Vehicle accidents resulting in injury or death to a person, property damage to an apparent extent of $500 + to one person will be forwarded to MSHP within 10 days RSMo 43.251 - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
28TH TRAFFIC RECORDS FORUM
MISSOURI MISSOURI
STARS / TMS INTEGRATIONSTARS / TMS INTEGRATION
RSMo 43.250RSMo 43.250Vehicle accidents resulting in injury or death to a person,
property damage to an apparent extent of $500 + to one person will be forwarded to MSHP within 10 days
RSMo 43.251RSMo 43.251Accident reports must be submitted to MSHP on a form
approved by Superintendent and contain all required information unless not available
Missouri PAR RegulationsMissouri PAR Regulations
19981998 MMUCC data elements reviewed PAR revision postponed
20002000 MMUCC data elements revisited FARS data elements reviewed FMCSA NGA requirements reviewed Prototype PAR and manual developed
20012001 Field test prototype PAR Training sessions conducted
20022002 Revised PAR implemented
Revision of Missouri PoliceRevision of Missouri Police Accident Report Accident Report
Missouri Traffic Records CommitteeMissouri Traffic Records Committee
State AgenciesState Agencies•Department of Health•Department of Revenue•Department of Transportation•Division of Motor Carriers and
Railroad Safety•Division of Highway Safety•Missouri State Highway Patrol
Local Law Enforcement AgenciesLocal Law Enforcement Agencies•Bridgeton PD•Cass County SO•Columbia PD•Kansas City PD•Poplar Bluff PD•St. Charles County SO•Springfield PD•St. Louis Metro PD
Federal AgenciesFederal Agencies•Federal Highway Administration•National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
OrganizationsOrganizationsMissouri Safety Center•Missouri Safety Counsel•AAA
Missouri Police Accident Missouri Police Accident ReportReport
Missouri Police Accident Missouri Police Accident ReportReport
Tips When Revising a PARTips When Revising a PAR Consider all reporting standards (MMUCC, NGA,
FARS, ANSI D16, etc.)
Encourage law enforcement input
Encourage user agency input
Field test prototype
Train before and after implementation
Missouri Traffic CrashesMissouri Traffic Crashes1991 - 20011991 - 2001
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
Source: Statewide Traffic Accident Records System
Re-engineering Missouri’s Re-engineering Missouri’s Crash Reporting SystemCrash Reporting System
19991999 Traffic Records Assessment STRAC established Strategic Plan for Highway Safety IS developed20002000 Internet based STARS business environment defined STARS / TMS integration determined most cost
effective Integration plan presented to Missouri directors Integration plan accepted
Why is Crash Data Necessary to Why is Crash Data Necessary to MoDOT?MoDOT?
Used to evaluate safety features Used to determine strategy effectiveness Used to calculate statewide average accident rates
based on type of facility Used to determine if a location needs corrective
action
MoDOT’s Preparation for MoDOT’s Preparation for MSHP/MoDOT IntegrationMSHP/MoDOT Integration
Implemented TMS (Transportation Management Systems) in 1998.
Implemented our first interface with MSHP in January 2000 to eliminate using a mainframe edit application.
MoDOT’s Preparation for MoDOT’s Preparation for MSHP/MoDOT IntegrationMSHP/MoDOT Integration
In conjunction with the new report form (2002), we changed how crashes were located– Implemented distance from a known intersection as
method of locating crashes– Assisted MSHP in training law enforcement officers on
the new location methodology– Provided an application to law enforcement officers with
routes and intersections available in TMS
Location Book Web ApplicationLocation Book Web Application
Accident Structure
MSHPSTARSNEW
MANUALWRITTENFORMS
Receipt ofReport
SortValidation &Pre-Coding
Image &Index
Edits:Ÿ MSHP CodesŸ Mandatory FieldsŸ Limited Detail Entry
Edits
UnlandedAccidentReport
Reporting
MSHPManual
Validation
Edits:Ÿ TMS LocationŸ Accident TypeŸ Supervisory Edits
TMS
"A100" FileMSHPSTAT
File Build
SACReporting
VariousFile
Distribution
Manual TMSLocation
Correction
TMSReporting
FORMRUNNERLoad Report
Extract Load orPre-Coded
Forms
File
Load
ManualValidateImage &
Index
STARS/TMS Workflow
PrintedForms
Good &Exceptions
ManualData
Entry intoSTARS
CVE
FARS
STARSImages
TMS
06/12/01
Auto AccidentField Report
(FORMRUNNER)
Accident Structure
TMS LANDEDONLY
TMS
STARS / TMS IntegrationSTARS / TMS Integration2001 – 20022001 – 2002 Tier Technologies, Inc. contract (6/01) Phase 1: Project Initiation (7/01) Phase 2: Project Analysis (9/01) Phase 3: STARS Development (1/02)
Entry Window Maintenance and Support WindowCode Table Support WindowSystem Testing User Acceptance TestingImplementation
Phase 4: Interface Development (1/02) STARS / TMS A100 CVE Agency Entry Batch
2001 – 2002 (cont.)2001 – 2002 (cont.)
STARS / TMS IntegrationSTARS / TMS Integration
Phase 5: QA and QC Development (11/01) Phase 6: Data Conversion Development (1/02) Phase 7: MSHP Development (11/01) Phase 8: TMS Development (11/01) STARS / TMS Implementation (1/02) STARS / TMS MOU & Advisory Committee (1/02)
Phase 9: STARS Production Support (3/02) Online Support Batch Interface Support Code Enhancements
BenefitsBenefitsof MSHP/MoDOT Mergerof MSHP/MoDOT Merger
Cost savings ~ $760,000 Electronic reporting Improved analytical capabilities with new
location methodology
BenefitsBenefitsof MSHP/MoDOT Mergerof MSHP/MoDOT Merger
Infrastructure open to enhancements 1985 – current online data CVE / MCMIS interface Avoidance of data duplication
Future EnhancementsFuture Enhancements
Electronic form interface Web reporting application Web data and report dissemination State agency database linking