28 katz parkinsons - ucsf · pdf filetreatment at symptom onset, cerebellar signs, or non-...
TRANSCRIPT
6/23/2016
1
Parkinson’s Disease for the Primary Care Provider
Maya Katz, M.D.Assistant Professor of Neurology
Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation CenterUCSF Medical Center
Review of Parkinson’s Disease: Out line
� PD demographics� PD diagnostic criteria� Main PD motor symptoms� Non-motor PD symptoms� Cognition and PD� Clinical course of PD� Pathology of PD� Pathophysiology of PD� Etiology of PD� Review treatments for PD
Parkinson’s disease: Demographics
1Wickremaracthi et al. 2009. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych; Walker et al. 2010. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders2Lees et al. 2009. The Lancet
1-2% of people 60 years of age or older (~130-140 per 100,000)
2nd most common neurodegenerative disorder
Average age of onset: 60 years old (range 20-95)
Men are more likely to develop Parkinson’s disease compared to women
Typical life expectancy: 12-20 years (range: 12-40)
Parkinson’s disease Diagnostic Criteria : UK Brain Bank
Step 1 MOTOR SYMPTOMS
Bradykinesia and either rest tremor (4-6 Hz tremor), rigidity or postural instability
Step 2 EXCLUSION CRITERIA
e.g. history of repeated strokes or TBI, h/o neuroleptic treatment at symptom onset, cerebellar signs, or non-responsiveness to levodopa, early severe autonomic involvement, early and severe dementia
Step 3 SUPPORTIVE CRITERIA (at least 3)
e.g, history of unilateral onset and persistent asymmetry of symptoms, 70-100% responsiveness to levodopa, presence of dyskinesias, clinical course for > 10 years, levodopa response for 5 years or more
Hughes et al. 2001, Neurology
6/23/2016
2
Parkinson’s disease: NINDS Diagnostic Criteria
Possible Parkinson’s disease
At least 2 features in Group A, with one of them being either tremor or bradykinesia, no features in group B present, and sustained response to dopaminergic therapy
Probable Parkinson’s disease
At least 3 of 4 features in group A present, no features in group B for > 3 years, and sustained response to dopaminergic therapy
Definite Parkinson’s disease
All criteria met for Possible PD, plus histopathologic confirmation of diagnosis at autopsy
Group A: characteristic of PD
Resting tremor (4-6 Hz)
Bradykinesia
Rigidity
Asymmetric onset
Group B: suggestive of alternative diagnosis
Onset of the following symptoms < 3 years after PD onset:
postural instabilityfreezinghallucinationsdementia
Supranuclear gaze palsy (other than restriction of upgaze or slowed saccades)
Severe dysautonomia
Other condition known to cause parkinsonism Gelb et al. 1999, Archives Neurol
Cardinal motor symptoms: Tremor
Cardinal motor symptoms: Bradykinesia Cardinal motor symptoms: Gait Impairment
6/23/2016
3
Motor symptoms are Just the tip of the iceberg…
Langston, 2006, Ann Neurol
PD non-motor symptoms: Categories
� Autonomic� Orthostasis� Constipation� Urinary urgency� ED
� Sleep� RBD� Poor sleep
maintenance� Sensory� Loss of smell� Loss of taste� Pain
� Psychiatric� Fatigue� Depression� Anxiety� Apathy� Psychosis
� Cognitive� Executive dysfunction� Impaired attention� Impaired visuo-spatial
function� Relative preservation of
anterograde memory� Mild cognitive impairment� Dementia
Barrone et al. 2009, Mov Disord
PD non-motor symptoms: Prevalence
� Most PD patients report an average of 8 non-motor symptoms
� Non-motor symptoms are often:� more difficult to treat� impair quality of life more than
motor symptoms
Barrone et al. 2009, Mov Disord
Cognitive deficits: Prevalence and clinical course
Litvan et al., 2011, Mov Disord; Litvan et al., 2012, Mov Disord; Marras et al. 2013, Mov Disord
Normal
PD-MCI
PD Dementia (PDD)
• PD-MCI: primarily nonamnestic single domain impairment
• ~30% meet criteria for PD-MCI within 3 years after diagnosis
• ~50% meet criteria for PD-MCI after 5 years
↓
↓
6/23/2016
4
Parkinson’s disease: Clinical course
Stage 5: ~2 yearsWheelchair bound or bedriddenCan only ambulate with another person assisting
Zhao et al. 2010, Mov Disord
Stage 4: ~2 yearsSevere disability,Needs an assistive device to walk or stand
Stage 3: ~2 years
Mild to moderate
bilateral involvement,
Postural instability,
Still independent Stage 2: ~7 years
Mild bilateral
involvement
Stage 1: ~2 yearsUnilateral involvement
PD pathology: substantia nigra pars compacta degeneration
Scarr et al., 2013, Front. Cell. Neurosci.; Jenner 2002, Neurology
PD pathology: Lewy body PD pathology: prion like disease
6/23/2016
5
PD pathology: Braak Staging
Braak et al., 2004, Cell Tissue Research
PD pathology: Peripheral Lewy Bodies
Tolosa and Vilas, 2015, Brain
� DaTSCANs detect presnaptic dopaminergic neuronal loss using SPECT imaging
� Measures Ioflupane (123I), which is a DAT ligand that binds to presynaptic dopamine transporters in the striatum
de la Feunte-Fernandez 2012. NeurologyPiggott 1998; Fang and Martin, 2015, Parkinsonism and Related
Disorders
PD imaging: DaTSCAN
� DAT can be used as an imaging biomarker for PD� Predictable change in Specific Binding Ratio (SBR)
annually, an average 7% SBR reduction annually, greater than 20 times the rate of signal loss seen in normal aging
Pigott 1998; Seibyl et al. 2016, presented at PPMI Investigator Conference
PD imaging: DaTSCAN
6/23/2016
6
PD pathophysiology: Rate Model
The basal ganglia has two major intrinsic pathways:
Direct and Indirect
• The direct pathway facilitates movement.
• The indirect pathway inhibits movement
• Striatal dopamine excites the direct pathway (increasing movement), and suppresses the indirect pathway (increasing movement)
PD pathophysiology: Rate Model
Basal Ganglia Direct and Indirect Pathways
PD pathophysiology: Brain Arrhythmia
Phase amplitude coupling� Increased bursting of
neuronal activity
� Increased synchronization in neuronal activity
� Increased oscillatory activity
de Hemptinne et al. 2013, PNAS
PD etiology: Multifactorial
• Complex interplay between • genetics (ingredients)• environment (recipe)
Tanner et al. 2011, Envi Health PerspectivesAbbott et al. 2015, Neurology
6/23/2016
7
PD Treatments: Role of exercise
Oguh et al. 2014, Parkinsonism and Related DisordersShu et al. 2014, PLOSYang et al. 2014, PLOSSharp and Hewitt, 2014, Neurosci Biobehav Rev
PD Treatments: Role of cognitive training
Paris et al. 2011, Movement Disorders
PD Treatment: MedicationsCarbidopa/Levodopa:Mechanism of Action
Cannas et al. 2010, Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat; Jenner, 2002, Neurology
PD Treatment: MedicationsCarbidopa/Levodopa:
Effects
� The most effective and generally well-tolerated medicine for PD
� Short half-life (~90 minutes), may need to be taken frequently as PD progresses
� Should be taken 30-60 minutes before or after a protein-rich meal
� Main side effects: nausea, lightheadedness, hallucinations, and dyskinesias
Cenci 2015, Frontiers in Neurology
6/23/2016
8
PD Treatment: Medications
Sinemet CR
Carbidopa/Levodopa:Formulations
Sinemet IR
Rytary
Parcopa
PD Treatment: MedicationsCarbidopa/Levodopa Extenders:
Mechanism of Action
• Rasagaline (Azilect)
• Selegiline (Eldepryl)
• Entacapone (Comtan)
• Tolcapone (Tasmar)
Najib 2001, Clinical Therapeutics, Youdim 2006, Nature Rev
PD Treatment: Medications
Carbidopa/Levodopa Extenders:Effects
Entacapone (Comtan)
Rasagaline (Azilect)
Tolcapone (Tasmar)
Selegiline (Eldepryl)
1 HOUR INCREASED ON-TIMESide effects: drug interactions1 HOUR INCREASED ON-TIMESide effects: drug interactions, HTN, insomnia, delirium
Najib 2001, Clinical Therapeutics
1 HOUR INCREASED ON-TIMESide effects: diarrhea, orange urine
2-3 HOURS INCREASED ON-TIMESide effects: Liver failure
PD Treatment: MedicationsDopamine Agonist:
Mechanism of Action
• Pramipexole (Mirapex)
• Ropinirole (Requip)
• Rotigotine (Neupro)
Jenner, 2002, Neurology
6/23/2016
9
PD Treatment: Medications
Dopamine Agonist:Effects
� Compared to carbidopa/levodopa� Lasts longer, half-life: ~6 hours� Lower risk of causing dyskinesias� More mild benefit
� Main side effects: sleep attacks, ICDs, sedation, confusion, hallucinations, cognitive deficits, dry mouth, lightheadedness
� Usually not prescribed to people over 70 years of age
Jenner, 2002, Neurology
PD Treatment: Motor Fluctuations & Dyskinesias
Cenci, 2014, Frontiers Neurology
PD Treatment: Motor Fluctuations
OFF MEDICATIONS ON MEDICATIONS
PD Treatments: Dyskinesias
6/23/2016
10
� The risk of dyskinesias is inversely proportional to the age of PD onsetAge of PD onset Percentage developing dyskinesia after 5 years of L-dopa
40-49 70%50-59 42%60-69 33%70-79 24%
Ku and Glass, 2010, Movement Disorders; PSG Study Group, NEJM, 2004
PD Treatments: Risk of dyskinesias� The risk of dyskinesias is inversely proportional t o the L-dopa dose
Dose of levodopa Percentage developing dyskinesia after 1 year of L-dopaPlacebo 3%150 mg/day 3%300 mg/day 2%600 mg/day 15%
Dopamine agonists
Trihexyphenidyl (Artane) MAO-B inhibitor(Selegiline or Rasagaline)
ZonisamidePD Treatments: Levodopa sparing therapy
Amantadine
PD Treatment: MedicationsLevodopa sparing therapy:
Effects
Trihexyphenidyl
Dopamine agonists
Zonisamide
Mild-moderate reduction in parkinsonism Side effects: ICD, sleep attacks, hallucinations, cognitive deficits
Najib 2001, Clinical Therapeutics
Reduces tremor, mild benefitSide effects: nephrolithiasis, somnolence, ataxia, confusion, cognitive deficits
Reduces tremor and dystoniaSide effects: sedation, delirium, hallucinations, increased risk of dementia, dry mouth, constipation
PD Treatment: MedicationsLevodopa sparing therapy:
Effects
MAO-B inhibitors
Najib 2001, Clinical Therapeutics
Amantadine
Very mild reduction in parkinsonism, Potential neuroprotective benefit Side effects: drug interactions, depends on whether rasagaline or selegiline are used
Mild to moderate reduction in parkinsonism, Reduces dyskinesiasSide effects: confusion, hallucinations, dry mouth, constipation,
6/23/2016
11
CALM-PD PSG Study Group, 2000, JAMA
� CALM-PD Clinical TrialDosing strategy Percentage developing dyskinesia
after 2 yearsImprovement in movement and function scale (UPDRS)
Pramipexole 10% 4.5 points
Levodopa 30% 9.2 points
PD Treatments: Risk of developing dyskinesias vs. quality of life � PD MED Clinical Trial
Age of PD onset
Percentage who discontinued allocated treatment due to side effects
Percentage who developed dyskinesias after 3 years
Domains of significant benefit (motor symptoms, QOL measures)
Dopamine agonist orMAO-B inhibitor
26% 33% None
Levodopa 2% 36% Overall QOL, Mobility,ADLs, Cognition, and Communication
PD MED Collaborative Group, 2014, The Lancet
PD Treatments: Risk of developing dyskinesias vs. quality of life
Amantadine
PD Treatments: Anti-dyskinetic medication
� Only medication that controls tremors, stiffness and slowness, AND also controls dyskinesias
� Could early amantadine prevent the development of dyskinesias?
PD Treatments: Duopa Infusion
Intestinal infusion of dopamine (levodopa)� Reduces off-medication time
� Can reduce dyskinesias
� Has been available in Europe for > 10 years
� Possible side effects:� Tubing issues� Otherwise same as oral L-dopa
6/23/2016
12
PD Treatments: Duopa Infusion
� Maintains consistent plasma levels of levodopa over a 16 hour infusion
Nyholm et al. MDS Conference abstract. 2012
PD Treatments: Duopa Infusion
The pump is worn throughout the day in a packThe pump is disconnected during sleep
PD Treatments: Deep brain stimulation (DBS)PD Treatments: Deep brain stimulation (DBS)
Permanently implanted brain pacemaker1. Lead2. Extension Wire
3. IPG
6/23/2016
13
DBS: video pre- and post-surgery
PRE-DBS POST-DBS
DBS: video pre- and post-surgery
PRE-DBS POST-DBS
DBS: video pre- and post-surgery
PRE-DBS POST-DBS
DBS: When to consider therapy?
Fasano & Deuschl 2012, Basal Ganglia
6/23/2016
14
DBS: Ideal candidates
• PD symptoms for at least 5 years
• Good levodopa response, but with motor fluctuations, dyskinesias, and/or adverse medication effects
• Freezing of gait and postural instability should not be the primary symptoms
• Ability to comply with lifelong and frequent follow-up
• Good social support
• Reasonable expectations for the surgery
• No medical contraindications for surgery
• No untreated severe psychiatric disease
• No dementiaMarks et al., Editor, 2015, Deep Brain Stimulation Management
DBS: What can DBS do?
• In general, only what levodopa can doExceptions: tremor and peak dose dyskinesias
• Increases the best “on-medication” state by 4-5 hours daily
• Improves motor function by 25-50%
• Raises the ceiling for off-medication times
• Reduction in medication dosing (30-50%)Marks et al., Editor, 2015, Deep Brain Stimulation Management
DBS: What are the limitations of DBS?
• Less effective for midline symptoms
• Will not treat non-motor symptoms (lightheadedness, constipation, sleep)
• Can make certain symptoms worse (e.g. speech, falls, behavior and cognition)
Marks et al., Editor, 2015, Deep Brain Stimulation Management Slide courtesy of Susan Heath
DBS: Basic Programming
6/23/2016
15
Traditional DBS surgery: awake Interventional MRI (iMRI) DBS surgery: asleep
Deep Brain Stimulation: GPi vs. STN
Marks et al., Editor, 2015, Deep Brain Stimulation Management
� Anatomy:� The goal is to implant the electrode into
the sensorimotor portion of the nucleus
Deep Brain Stimulation: GPi vs. STN
Marks et al., Editor, 2015, Deep Brain Stimulation Management
6/23/2016
16
Deep Brain Stimulation: GPi vs. STN
Okun, Arch Neurol, 2005
� Anatomy:
� The GPi is a much larger target than the STN (~500mm3 vs. 200 mm3).
� The smaller STN target may make it more susceptible to adverse effects due to spread of current.
� The smaller size of STN is likely what allows for a lower average charge density (fewer battery replacements ).
� More neurosurgeons feel comfortable with STN targeting .
Deep Brain Stimulation: GPi vs. STN
Miocinovic et al. 2006, J NeurophysOkun 2005, Arch NeurolRodriguez-Oroz 2005, Brain
• Paresthesias
• Dysarthria, dysphagia
• Increased falls
• Reduced verbal fluency
• Dyskinesias
• Behavioral changes
• Increased suicidality
• Hypomania
Benarroch, et al., 2008, Neurology
DBS: STNStimulation-induced adverse effects
• Paresthesias
• Dysarthria, dysphagia
• Visual phenomena
Gross et al. 2006
DBS: GPiStimulation-induced adverse effects
6/23/2016
17
Deep Brain StimulationGPi vs. STN
Williams et al., 2014, Movement Disorders
DBS: Mechanism of Action
• DBS is a permanently implanted brain pacemaker
• Phase amplitude coupling observed in PD is reversed with DBS
De Hemptinne et al., 2013, PNAS
PD Treatments: Palliative Care
…our most cruel failure in how we treat the sick and the aged is the failure to recognize that they have priorities beyond merely being safe and living longer.
Being Mortal: Medicine and What Matters in the EndAtul Gawande, M.D.
UCSF Parkinson’s Disease Supportive Care Clinic
Palliative Care for Parkinson’s Disease
6/23/2016
18
Clinical TeamPalliative care physician: Steve Pantilat, M.D.
Neurologist: Maya Katz, M.D. and Nick Galifianakis, M.D.
Nurse: Karen Merchant, RN
Chaplain: Judy Long, MS
Social worker: Monica Eisenhardt, LCSW
Palliative Care for Parkinson’s Disease
� Study design� Randomized Clinical Trial
� Study visits� Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
� Primary outcomes� QOL and caregiver distress at 6 months
� Secondary outcomes� Predictors of response, health service utilization, qualitative
interviews to optimize intervention
Study Summary
Palliative Care for Parkinson’s Disease
� Lorna Beccaria, Study Coordinator� 415-353-9453� [email protected]
� Maya Katz, Site Principal Investigator� 415-446-9396� [email protected]
Questions/Referrals
Palliative Care for Parkinson’s DiseaseParkinson’s Disease Clinical Trials
6/23/2016
19
UCSF MOVEMENT DISORDER AND NEUROMODULATION CENTER (MDNC)SFVA PARKINSON’S DISEASE RESEARCH, EDUCATION AND CLINICAL CENTER (PADRECC)
Jill L. Ostrem, M.D. – MDNC Medical DirectorPhilip A. Starr, M.D., Ph.D. – MDNC Surgical DirectorCaroline M. Tanner, M.D., Ph.D. – PADRECC Director
NeurologyJill L. Ostrem, M.D.Caroline Tanner, M.D., Ph.D.Nicholas Galifianakis,M.D.Marta San Luciano, M.D.Maya Katz, M.D.Jim Mass, M.D.Robert White, M.D.NeurosurgeryPhilip A. Starr, M.D.., Ph.D.Paul S. Larson, M.D.Edward F. Chang, M.D., Ph.D.Dan Lim, M.D., Ph.D.NeuropsychologyCaroline A. Racine, Ph.D.Johannes Rothlind, Ph.D.NursingMonica Volz, N.P.Susan Heath, M.S., R.N.Karen Merchant, RN
Clinical Support StaffShatara BlackmonYasmeen GonzalezChristine JiuntiMelissa ChenJanet AllenLori AnzaldoSarena PerezSocial WorkMonica Eisenhardt, L.C.S.W.Research StaffSarah Wang, Ph.D.Lorna Beccaria, R.N.Kristen Dodenhoff, B.A.Michael Dodge, B.A.FellowsNijee Luthra, M.D., Ph.D.Cameron Dietiker, M.D.Erica Byrd, M.D.Jennifer Chen, M.D.Svjetlana Miocinovic, M.D., Ph.D.Brian Lee, M.D., Ph.D.
1
Parkinson’s Disease for the Primary Care ProviderAdvances in Internal Medicine
Self-Assessment Exam Question
Thank you
Slide 73
1 Need an acknowledgment pageMaya Katz, 2/27/2013