2.2 equipment risk assessments

112
DP Plastics Group SECTION 2. Equipment Risk Assessments 2.2.1 Forklift 2.2.2 Pallet Truck 2.2.3 Vacuum Former 2.2.4 Edging Machine – Roller Press 2.2.5 Hole Clipper – Roller Press 2.2.6 Glue Machine 2.2.7 Blue Double Hydraulic Press 2.2.8 Blue Single Hydraulic Press x 2 2.2.9 Green Single Hydraulic Press 2.2.10 CNC Router Pacer x 2 2.2.11 Band Saw 2.2.12 Electric Drill 2.2.13 Cordless Drill 2.2.14 Jigsaw 2.2.15 Glass Washer 2.2.16 Super Spacer 2.2.17 Hot Melt Machine 2.2.18 Sand Blasting Box 2.2.19 CAD Table 2.2.20 Chop Saw

Upload: althaf2010

Post on 27-Oct-2014

57 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

SECTION 2.

Equipment

Risk Assessments

2.2.1 Forklift2.2.2 Pallet Truck2.2.3 Vacuum Former2.2.4 Edging Machine – Roller Press2.2.5 Hole Clipper – Roller Press2.2.6 Glue Machine2.2.7 Blue Double Hydraulic Press2.2.8 Blue Single Hydraulic Press x 22.2.9 Green Single Hydraulic Press2.2.10 CNC Router Pacer x 22.2.11 Band Saw2.2.12 Electric Drill2.2.13 Cordless Drill2.2.14 Jigsaw2.2.15 Glass Washer2.2.16 Super Spacer2.2.17 Hot Melt Machine2.2.18 Sand Blasting Box2.2.19 CAD Table2.2.20 Chop Saw2.2.21 Spacer Application2.2.22 Resin Injection Machine2.2.23 Mixing Machine2.2.24 Clicker Press2.2.25 Wadkin Router

Page 2: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.1

Equipment: Forklift Truck

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safety and risks associated with Forklift truck

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

Forklift Driver All staff in vicinity Daily basis

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people) Maintenance of Forklift Truck Falling objects Collisions with pedestrians Horn not working Side plate missing Diesel Fumes Chain breaking

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list

Forklift driver – competent person

Maintenance – In house

Forklift truck in open area

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 3: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( )

3. Moderate ( ) 3. Quite Possible (x ) = ( 15 )4. Severe ( ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( x ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Lifting Operation and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required Repair horn – immediate action. Set in maintenance schedule – In house. Ensure Forklift is checked annually under Insurance. Replace side plate. Driver – requires to be certificated.

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 4: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.2

Equipment: Pallet truck

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safety and risks associated with the pallet truck

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

Potential all personnel. Daily basis – various times.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people)

Use of equipment. Mechanics of equipment.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list

Competent users.

Pallet truck – good working order.

In house maintenance.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 5: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( x )

3. Moderate ( x ) 3. Quite Possible ( ) = ( 6 )4. Severe ( ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (LOW)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Lifting Operation and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

N/A

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 6: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.3

Equipment: Vacuum Formers x 3

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safety and risks associated with the Vacuum Formers

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

1 x operator – daily basis. Other personnel in the vicinity.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people) Operating machines. Potential burns. Crush injuries. Maintenance of machines. Access to rear of machines allowing access to moving parts. Compressed air. Electrical parts secure.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list Competent operator.

Weighted front guard – interlocking guard.

Automatic cut outs and emergency stop button.

Covered cooling fan at rear.

Restricted access to rear of machines – needs reviewing.

Temperature indicator.

Service contract and breakdown.

In house maintenance.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 7: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( )

3. Moderate ( ) 3. Quite Possible (x ) = ( 15 )4. Severe ( ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe (x ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 Noise at Work Regulations 1989 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

Fit physical barrier to rear of machine to prevent access

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 8: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.4

Equipment: Edging Machine

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safety and risks associated with the Edging Machine

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

1 x operator. Daily basis – others in the vicinity.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people) Machine operation. Catching fingers in rollers and

between cutting tool. Arm dragging into rollers. Cuts from cutting tool. Potential for tool to roll off

machine.

Electrical. Hitting head on board frame. Obstructions and projections. Maintenance of machine.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list Competent operator.

Personal protection equipment – gloves.

Button release cut out.

Pressure guard both sides of roller – automatically reverses machine.

Board frame ends protected.

In house maintenance.

Electrical parts secure.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 9: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( )

3. Moderate ( x) 3. Quite Possible ( x ) = ( 9 )4. Severe ( ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

Ensure competency of operator

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 10: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.5

Equipment: Hole Clipper

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas AssessedTo assess the safety and risks associated with the Hole Clipper

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

1 x operator. Daily basis. Others in the vicinity.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people) Machine operation. Catching fingers in rollers and

between cutting tool. Arm dragging into rollers. Cuts from cutting tool. Potential for tool to roll off

machine.

Electrical. Hitting head on board frame. Obstructions and projections. Maintenance of machine.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list Personal protective equipment – gloves.

Competent operator.

Automatic flap cut out guard – reverses machine.

Board frame ends protected.

In house maintenance.

Emergency stops – separate on/off switches.

Electrical arts secure.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 11: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( )

3. Moderate ( ) 3. Quite Possible ( x ) = ( 12 )4. Severe (x ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

Ensure competency of operator

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 12: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.6

Equipment: Glue Machine

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safety and risks associated with the Glue Machine

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

1 x operator. Daily basis. Others in the vicinity.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people) Entrapment Crush injuries Amputations Skin disorders Chemical injuries – substances

used. .Electrical

Compressed air. Moving parts – gluing head and

chain. Maintenance of machine. Housekeeping of machine and

area. Obstructions and projections.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list Emergency stop buttons x 3.

PPE worn.

In house maintenance.

Foot pedal operation.

Electrical parts secure.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 13: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( )

3. Moderate ( ) 3. Quite Possible ( x ) = ( 15 )4. Severe ( ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( x ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 C.O.S.H.H. Regulations 2002 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required Machine and area – deep clean required. COSHH assessments. Recommend – investigation into safety cut out at gluing head. Ensure personal protective equipment – mask.

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 14: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.7

Equipment: Hydraulic Press

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safety and risks associated with the blue double hydraulic press

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

2 x operators. Daily basis. Others in the vicinity.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people) Maintenance of press. Crush injuries – no cut outs. Poor housekeeping. Machine operation. No automatic cut off. Electrical.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list In house maintenance.

Press – slow moving parts.

Competent users.

Pressure gauge indicator.

Daily cleaner.

Electrical parts secure.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 15: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( x )

3. Moderate ( ) 3. Quite Possible ( ) = ( 10 )4. Severe ( ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( x ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

Recommend cut out fitted – investigate. Ensure good housekeeping.

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 16: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.8

Equipment: Hydraulic press x 2

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safety and risks associated with the blue single hydraulic press

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

2-4 persons Every day Others in vicinity

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people) Maintenance of presses. Crush injuries Machine operation. Housekeeping. Obstruction and projections. No automatic cut off. Electrical

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list In house maintenance.

Press plate – slow moving.

Competent users.

Pressure gauge indicator.

Daily cleaner.

Electrical parts secure.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 17: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( x )

3. Moderate ( ) 3. Quite Possible ( ) = ( 10 )4. Severe ( ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( x ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

Recommend cut out fitted – investigate. Ensure good housekeeping.

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 18: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.9

Equipment: Hydraulic press

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safety and risks associated with the green single hydraulic press

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

2-4 persons Every day Others in vicinity

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people) Maintenance of press. Crush injuries Machine operation. Housekeeping. No automatic cut off. Condition of piston rods. Guard loose around motor. Electrical.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list In house maintenance.

Press plate – slow moving.

Competent users.

Pressure gauge indicator.

Daily cleaner.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

In past, piston rods have snapped at weld releasing pressing plate.

Page 19: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( )

3. Moderate ( ) 3. Quite Possible ( x ) = ( 15 )4. Severe ( x ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( x ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

Recommend replacing piston rods. Recommend cut out fitted – investigate. Ensure good housekeeping.

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 20: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.10

Equipment: CNC Router x 2

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safety and risks associated with the CNC routers x 2.

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

1 x operator. Daily basis. Others in the vicinity.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people) Automatic moving parts. Noise. Dust. Machine operation. Compressed air

Obstructions and projections. Maintenance of machine and

extraction system. Electrical.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list Extraction system fitted.

Competent operation.

Compressed air – service contract.

In house maintenance.

Electrical parts secure.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Machine operation is fully automatic, computer system controls the function of the machine. Operator sets up program and stands back and waits for machines to finish.

Machine also selects which router blade to use automatically.

Page 21: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk AssessmentCalculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( )

3. Moderate ( ) 3. Quite Possible ( x ) = ( 12 )4. Severe ( x ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 C.O.S.H.H. Regulations 2002 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 Noise at Work Regulations 1989 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

Noise assessment to be completed. Ensure operators properly trained to use equipment. Signage required to inform others of machine operation.

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 22: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.11

Equipment: Band Saw

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safety and risks associated with the Band Saw

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

1 x operator. Daily basis. Others in the vicinity.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people) Cuts Noise Dust PAT testing. Stability of equipment. Ejection of parts/materials.

Blade snapping. Maintenance of equipment. Equipment operation – electrical.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list On/off switch.

Safety instructions sign on equipment.

In house maintenance.

Visual checks by operator.

Competent user.

Appears in good condition.

Electrical parts secure.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 23: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( )

3. Moderate ( ) 3. Quite Possible ( x ) = ( 12 )4. Severe ( x ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 Noise at Work Regulations 1989 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

Position of band saw needs changing – more stable surface. Ensure operator wears personal protective equipment. PAT testing required.

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 24: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.12

Equipment: Electric drill

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas AssessedTo assess the safety and risks associated with the electric drill.

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

1 x operators. Daily basis. Others users when required. Others in the vicinity.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people) Cuts.

Noise.

Dust/Shards.

Ejection of material.

Operating electrical equipment.

Entanglement.

PAT testing.

Maintenance.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list Competent user.

Tool replaced after use.

In house maintenance.

Visual checks by operator.

Good condition.

Electrics appear safe.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 25: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( )

3. Moderate ( x ) 3. Quite Possible ( x ) = ( 9 )4. Severe ( ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 Noise at Work Regulations 1989 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

PAT testing required. Wear PPE as necessary

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 26: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.13

Equipment: Cordless drill

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas AssessedTo assess the safety and risks associated with the cordless drill

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

1 x operators. Daily basis. Others users when required. Others in the vicinity.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people) Cuts.

Noise.

Dust/Shards.

Ejection of material.

Operating equipment.

Entanglement.

PAT testing.

Maintenance.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list Competent user.

Tool replaced after use.

In house maintenance.

Visual checks by operator.

Good condition.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 27: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( )

3. Moderate (x ) 3. Quite Possible (x ) = ( 9 )4. Severe ( ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

Wear personal protective equipment as necessary.

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 28: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.14

Equipment: Electric Jigsaw

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas AssessedTo assess the safety and risks associated with the Electric Jigsaw

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

1 x operators. Daily basis. Others users when required. Others in the vicinity.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people) Cuts.

Noise.

Dust/Shards.

Ejection of material.

Operating electrical equipment.

Entanglement.

PAT testing.

Maintenance.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list Competent user.

Tool replaced after use.

In house maintenance.

Visual checks by operator.

Good condition.

Electrics appear safe.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 29: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( )

3. Moderate ( x ) 3. Quite Possible (x ) = ( 9 )4. Severe ( ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required PAT testing required. Wear personal protective equipment.

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 30: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.15

Equipment: Glass washer

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safety and risks associated with the Glass Washer

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

1 x operator. Daily basis. Others in the vicinity.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people)

Noise. Injury of handling glass. Pump system. Electrical. Cracked visual screen. Contact with moving parts. Water softener system.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list

All moving parts enclosed

Toughened glass with bevelled edges.

Emergency stop buttons.

Water softener system changed/refilled regularly.

Electrical parts secure.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 31: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( )

3. Moderate ( x ) 3. Quite Possible ( x ) = ( 9 )4. Severe ( ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

New front screen required.

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 32: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.16

Equipment: Super Spacer System

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safety and risks associated with the Super Spacer System

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

1 x operator. Daily basis. Others in the vicinity.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people) Machine operation. Compressed air. Changing space bar reel. Cutting blade in space bar gun. Obstructions and projection. Space bar gun.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list

Competent operator.

Space bar gun enclosed.

Space bar eel system secure.

Compressed air – serviced contract.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 33: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( x )

3. Moderate ( x ) 3. Quite Possible ( ) = ( 6 )4. Severe ( ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (LOW)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 C.O.S.H.H. Regulations 2002 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

N/A

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 34: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.17

Equipment: Hot Melt Machine

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safety and risks associated with the Hot Melt Machine

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

1 x operator. Daily basis. Others in the vicinity.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people)

Burns from gun. Burns from hot material. Hose and cable. Side of machine missing. Access to hot parts. Machine operation.

PAT testing. Electrical – exposed wires at plug. Machine on wheels – mobile. Moving parts – pump.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list Isolator switch.

Bevelled glass used.

Temperature indicator.

Competent user.

Access hatch for hot melt.

Wheels locked into position.

Temperature controlled/hose protected (insulated).

Personal protective equipment available.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 35: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk AssessmentCalculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( )

3. Moderate ( ) 3. Quite Possible ( ) = ( 12 )4. Severe ( x ) 4. Likely ( x )

5. Very Severe ( ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 C.O.S.H.H. Regulations 2002 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required PAT testing required. Wear PPE when necessary. Replace missing side. Repair exposed wires. Secure trailing cable.

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 36: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.18

Equipment: Sand Blaster

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas AssessedTo assess the safety and risks associated with the Sand Blasting Box

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

1-2 persons Daily Others in the vicinity.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people) Flying dust and debris Compressed air. Access to machine. Machine operation. Obstructions and projections. Housekeeping of machine and area.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list All moving parts enclosed.

Partly enclosed work area

Vision panel.

Safety signage regarding personal protective equipment.

Rear door access secure.

Extraction system.

Competent operators.

Machine earthed.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 37: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( )

3. Moderate (x ) 3. Quite Possible (x ) = ( 9 )4. Severe ( ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

Ensure regular maintenance and cleaning of filters. Area requires regular cleaning schedule.

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 38: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.19

Equipment: CAD Table

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safety and risks associated with the CAD Plotter

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

1 person All day Others in glass shop.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people) Automatic moving parts – plotting head and plastic chain. Entrapment. Machine operation. Skin disorders - use of substances. Obstructions and projections. Fumes – small within area.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list

Personal protective equipment – rubber gloves for carrying glass.

Bevelled edges of glass.

Competent operator.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Machine operation is fully automatic, computer system controls the function of the machine. Operator sets up program and speed and waits for machine to finish.

Page 39: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( )

3. Moderate ( x ) 3. Quite Possible ( x ) = ( 9 )4. Severe ( ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 C.O.S.H.H. Regulations 2002 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

Substances to be assessed. Recommend ventilation system for area. Ensure personal protective equipment is available – face mask.

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 40: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.20

Equipment: Chop Saw

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safe use of the Chop Saw

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

1 x operator. Daily basis. Others in the vicinity.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people) Electrical equipment. Cutting blade. Swarf. Machine operation. Ejection of parts/material. Noise.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list Self adjusting guard fitted.

Competent operator.

Noise is limited to cutting time – short burst.

Machine secure.

Minimal usage.

Safe systems of work – electrical equipment.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 41: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( )

3. Moderate ( x ) 3. Quite Possible ( x ) = ( 9 )4. Severe ( ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 Noise at Work Regulations 1989 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

PAT testing. Recommend personal protective equipment for operator.

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 42: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.21

Equipment: Spacer System (Resin Room)

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safety and risks associated with the Spacer in the Resin Room

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

2-4 Persons Daily basis.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people)

Machine operation. Changing space bar reel.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list

Competent users.

Space bar reel system secure.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Spacer system in resin room does not operate with space bar gun and compressed air.

Spacer material is manually placed around glass.

Page 43: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( x )

3. Moderate ( x ) 3. Quite Possible ( ) = ( 6 )4. Severe ( ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (LOW)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

N/A

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 44: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.22

Equipment: Resin Injection Machine

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safety and risks associated with the Resin Injection Machine

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

1 x operator. All day. Others within Resin Room.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people)

Compressed air Skin disorders – substances used. Fumes Manual handling Machine operation.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list

Ventilation system.

Some personal protective equipment worn.

Competent operator.

Compressed air – service contract.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 45: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( )

3. Moderate ( x ) 3. Quite Possible ( x ) = ( 9 )4. Severe ( ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 C.O.S.H.H. Regulations 2002 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

Substances to be assessed. Ensure personal protective equipment is available and worn.

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 46: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.23

Equipment: Mixing Machine

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safety and risks associated with the Mixing Machine

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

All personnel.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people)

Machine not operational at present.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list

N/A

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 47: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( )

3. Moderate ( x ) 3. Quite Possible ( x ) = ( 9 )4. Severe ( ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

Risk assess machine when operational.

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 48: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.24

Equipment: Clicker Press

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safety and risks associated with the Clicker Press.

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

1 x operator. As and when required (on average 1-5 times a day). Others in the vicinity.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people)

Maintenance of press. Crush injuries. Machine operation. Electrical parts.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list

In house maintenance.

Competent operators.

Electrics secured.

Limited usage.

Information sign.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 49: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( x )

3. Moderate ( ) 3. Quite Possible ( ) = ( 8 )4. Severe ( x ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (LOW)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 50: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

Company: DP Plastics Group Section: 2.2Panels Plus Ref No: 2.2.25

Equipment: Wadkin Router

Assessor: L. LargeDate of Assessment: 28th September 2005 Job Title: H&S Advisor

Operation, Activity or Work Areas Assessed

To assess the safety and risks associated with the Wadkin Router.

Identify persons or maximum number of people exposed together with frequency/duration of task

1 x operator. Daily basis. Others in the vicinity.

Hazards Identified (Potential to cause harm to people)

Machine not operational at present.

What preventative measures are already in place to reduce risk? Please list

N/A

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 51: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Risk Assessment

Calculate by using the following guide: Please tick box to establish the risk, multiply the hazard by the probability.

Hazard Probability

1. Negligible ( ) 1. Unlikely ( )

2. Slight ( ) 2. Possible ( )

3. Moderate ( x ) 3. Quite Possible ( x ) = ( 9 )4. Severe ( ) 4. Likely ( )

5. Very Severe ( ) 5. Very Likely ( )

1 - 8 Low 9 - 15 Medium 16 - 25 High

Is the Hazard / Risk: Low Medium High = (MEDIUM)

References

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 The Provision and Use of Works Equipment Regulations 1998 The Manual Handling Operation Regulations 1992 Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 The Workplace (Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992

Further actions to reduce risk, if required

Risk assess machine when operational

Signed: (Assessor)

Action by:

Review date on completion of actions:

Page 52: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

RISK ASSESSMENT

RISK ASSESSMENT ANNUAL STATUSSECTION 2.2 – EQUIPMENT

REF 2004 2005 2006 20072.2.1 Forklift 15

2.2.2 Pallet Truck 6

2.2.3 Vacuum Former 15

2.2.4 Edging Machine – Roller Press

9

2.2.5 Hole Clipper – Roller Press

12

2.2.6 Glue Machine 15

2.2.7 Blue Double Hydraulic Press

10

2.2.8 Blue Single Hydraulic Press x 2

10

2.2.9 Green Single Hydraulic Press

15

2.2.10 CNC Router x 2 12

2.2.11 Bank Saw 12

2.2.12 Electric Drill 9

2.2.13 Cordless Drill 9

2.2.14 Jigsaw 9

2.2.15 Glass Washer 9

2.2.16 Super Spacer 6

2.2.17 Hot Melt Machine 12

2.2.18 Sand Blasting Box 9

Page 53: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

REF 2004 2005 2006 20072.2.19 CAD Table 9

2.2.20 Chop Saw 9

2.2.21 Spacer Application 6

2.2.22 Resin Injection Machine

9

2.2.23 Mixing Machine 9

2.2.24 Clicker Press 8

2.2.25 Wadkin Router 9

Page 54: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

SECTION 10

Equipment

Health and Safety Action Plan

Page 55: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

Equipment

HEALTH AND SAFETY ACTION PLAN

ISSUE RATING NOMINATEDPERSON

√ WHEN COMPLETE

2.2.1 Repair horn – immediate action.Set in maintenance schedule – In house.Ensure Forklift is checked annually under Insurance.Replace side plate.Driver – requires to be certificated.

Medium

2.2.3 Fit physical barrier to rear of machine to prevent access

Medium

2.2.4 Ensure competency of operator.

Medium

2.2.5 Ensure competency of operator.

Medium

2.2.6 Machine and area – deep clean required.COSHH assessments.Recommend – investigation into safety cut out at gluing head.Ensure personal protective equipment – mask.

Medium

2.2.7 Recommend cut out fitted – investigate.Ensure good housekeeping.

Medium

Page 56: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

2.2.8 Recommend cut out fitted – investigate.Ensure good housekeeping.

Medium

2.2.9 Recommend replacing piston rods.Recommend cut out fitted – investigate.Ensure good housekeeping.

Medium

2.2.10

Noise assessment to be completed.Ensure operators properly trained to use equipment.Signage required to inform others of machine operation.

Medium

2.2.11

Position of band saw needs changing – more stable surface.Ensure operator wears personal protective equipment.PAT testing required.

Medium

2.2.12

PAT testing required.Wear PPE as necessary

Medium

2.2.13

Wear personal protective equipment as necessary.

Medium

2.2.14

PAT testing required.Wear personal protective equipment.

Medium

2.2.15

New front screen required. Medium

Page 57: 2.2 Equipment Risk Assessments

DP Plastics Group

2.2.17

PAT testing required.Wear PPE when necessary.Replace missing side.Repair exposed wires.Secure trailing cable.

Medium

2.2.18

Ensure regular maintenance and cleaning of filters.Area requires regular cleaning schedule.

Medium

2.2.19

Substances to be assessed.Recommend ventilation system for area.Ensure personal protective equipment is available – face mask.

Medium

2.2.20

PAT testing.Recommend personal protective equipment for operator.

Medium

2.2.22

Substances to be assessed.Ensure personal protective equipment is available and worn.

Medium

2.2.23

Risk assess machine when operational.

Medium

2.2.25

Risk assess machine when operational.

Medium