204520 eskom sa case study
TRANSCRIPT
From The Cradle To Evolution Of A
Primavera Enterprise Implementation(Eskom SA Case Study)
Presenters:
Raymond Poole - PMIS Ltd.
Geoff Roberts – Oracle Primavera
• Provide a holistic view of how a Primavera Enterprise
Solution evolves from being a Vision (concept) to a Reality
• Provide Lessons Learned for such implementations
• Transfer of knowledge to audience
OBJECTIVES…
Raymond Poole – Managing Director PMIS Ltd.
Project Manager on Eskom (South Africa) Oracle Primavera
Implementation Project JAN-2011 till DEC-2012
Geoff Roberts – Oracle Primavera Strategy Manager
Solutions
Responsible for Selling the Vision to Eskom
Oracle Primavera QA/QC Manager on Eskom Project
PRESENTERS…
Eskom…
Eskom generates 95% of electricity used in South
Africa and approximately 45% on the continent of
Africa
Eskom’s capacity expansion budget is R385 billion
up to 2013 and is expected to grow more than a
trillion Rand by 2026
Eskom’s strategic direction is to:
"To drive investment, efficiencies and transformation in its portfolio of
State Owned Companies, their customers and their suppliers to unlock
growth, create jobs and develop skills."
Timelines…
• Selling the Vision SEPT – DEC 2010
• Proof of Concept (PoC) JAN – JUN 2011
• Gx Upgrade (3 Sites) JUL – OCT 2011
• Go Live (Pilot Site) NOV 2011 – MAR 2012
• Gx Readiness Assessment MAR – MAY 2012
• Embedment & Post Go Live Support JUN – NOV 2012
The Vision…
• To support Eskom GCD in its creation of a World
Class centre of excellence for Project
Management
Group Capital mandate
To create a centre of excellence in the allocation of capital at the group level and in the
planning, development and execution of projects
▪ Optimise the Group-wide capital portfolio and allocate funds
– Allocate and optimise the full capital portfolio including Research and Pilots, capacity
expansion projects and refurbishments
– This does not include Routine Maintenance or Outages
▪ Conduct central planning and execution of projects within GCD that fulfil the following criteria:
– High interdependency in the execution of the project between divisions or between
business units requiring central coordination
– Projects covering multiple sites or regions where central planning and execution
optimises resource allocation
– Strategic or high risk in nature
Note: Projects will not be determined by value
▪ Act as the custodian to standardise and monitor capital projects across Eskom
Group Capital mandate
To create a centre of excellence in the allocation of capital at the group level and in the
planning, development and execution of projects
▪ Optimise the Group-wide capital portfolio and allocate funds
– Allocate and optimise the full capital portfolio including Research and Pilots, capacity
expansion projects and refurbishments
– This does not include Routine Maintenance
▪ Conduct central planning and execution of projects within GCD that fulfil the following criteria:
– High interdependency in the execution of the project between divisions or between
business units requiring central coordination
– Projects covering multiple sites or regions where central planning and execution
optimises resource allocation
– Strategic or high risk in nature
Note: Projects will not be determined by value
▪ Act as the custodian to standardise and monitor capital projects across Eskom
PCM/Unifier enables organisation to effectively manage there portfolio of
capital Projects
Group Capital mandate To create a centre of excellence in the allocation of capital at the group level and in the
planning, development and execution of projects
▪ Optimise the Group-wide capital portfolio and allocate funds
– Allocate and optimise the full capital portfolio including Research and Pilots, capacity
expansion projects and refurbishments
– This does not include Routine Maintenance
▪ Conduct central planning and execution of projects within GCD that fulfil the following
criteria:
– High interdependency in the execution of the project between divisions or between
business units requiring central coordination
– Projects covering multiple sites or regions where central planning and execution
optimises resource allocation
– Strategic or high risk in nature
Note: Projects will not be determined by Rand value
▪ Act as the custodian to standardise and monitor capital projects across Eskom
Primavera is a highly collaborative Project and Program management
solution that will enable Eskom GC to effectively manage there projects in
execution, including the management of schedule, resources, forecast
cost and risks
We are creating Group Capital to build a world-
class centre of excellence on capital projects
Current challenges
Build a world-class
centre of excellence on capital projects
▪ Create the oversight, transparency and control
required to manage Eskom’s significant capital spend
over the next seven years – Integrated Oracle
Primavera stack
▪ Approach the planning and execution of capital
projects in a more integrated way - Integrated Oracle
Primavera stack
▪ Reflect the changing context of Eskom - PCM/Unifier
▪ Increase public confidence in Eskom and enable us
to better defend rate increases – Web services feed to
GIS/BI
Objectives
World-class capital organisations
▪ Data administration – compliance of data entry into a centralized
database, system improvements
▪ Ensure visibility and transparency on project status
▪ Prioritise and accelerate the launch of high-value projects
▪ Draw up business plans:
– Review and support proposed plans
– Originate and execute proprietary business cases
Economic
analyses
Technical
support
System
integrity
Best practice
▪ Allocate capital - set budget size, timing and distribution
▪ Optimise the portfolio - balance risk and return, ensure smooth cash flows
▪ Review projected vs. post-completion results
Portfolio
allocation
2
3
4
1
▪ Maintain, foster and share best practices via guidelines/training
▪ Improve negotiation power in strategic sourcing, as suppliers are usually
the same for multiple projects
▪ Optimise project support by providing assistance to project teams
World-class capital organisations
▪ Data administration – compliance of data entry into a centralized
database, system improvements
▪ Ensure visibility and transparency on project status
▪ Prioritise and accelerate the launch of high-value projects
▪ Draw up business plans:
– Review and support proposed plans
– Originate and execute proprietary business cases
Economic
analyses
Technical
support
System
integrity
Best practice
▪ Allocate capital - set budget size, timing and distribution
▪ Optimise the portfolio - balance risk and return, ensure smooth cash flows
▪ Review projected vs. post-completion results
Portfolio
allocation
2
3
4
1
▪ Maintain, foster and share best practices via guidelines/training
▪ Improve negotiation power in strategic sourcing, as suppliers are usually
the same for multiple projects
▪ Optimise project support by providing assistance to project teams
PCM/Unifier
PCM/SAP IM
UPK
Oracle Support
Unifier/PCM
P6
Analytics
▪ A clear system that enables us to improve our capital portfolio in line with Eskom’s
overall strategic direction and resource availability – P6/PCM (Unifier)
▪ A coordinated, improved investment approval that helps us make the right decisions
at the right time and prioritises our capital spend
▪ New, standardised processes, procedures and systems that boost our efficiency
even further - UPK
▪ Synchronisation between businesses that helps us execute faster and more
smoothly – P6/PCM (Unifier)
▪ More efficient use of our scarce and valuable resources - P6
▪ New opportunities to develop our talent
▪ Learning from sharing information and experience across projects and businesses
Benefits
Role of the GCIC
▪ Create transparency on existing capital portfolio: all capital budget must
go through the GCIC initially
▪ Allocate capital to portfolio and set overall financial boundaries and
constraints
▪ Approve appropriate/important business cases1 and release discretionary
divisional capex budget
▪ Monitor progress of overall capex project execution
▪ Perform detailed review on selected projects (e.g., high risk, high value)
▪ Approve standards in systems, tools and methodology
Role of the GCIC
▪ Create transparency on existing capital portfolio: all capital budget must
go through the GCIC initially
▪ Allocate capital to portfolio and set overall financial boundaries and
constraints
▪ Approve appropriate/important business cases1 and release discretionary
divisional capex budget
▪ Monitor progress of overall capex project execution
▪ Perform detailed review on selected projects (e.g., high risk, high value)
▪ Approve standards in systems, tools and methodology
Summary
The Oracle Primavera Program management
solution when integrated with SAP will provide
Eskom with an Enterprise business solution
utilising Best in Class Project Portfolio
management tools
Contract ManagementChange ManagementContract Management
Claim ManagementIssue Management
P6Project Management
Risk ManagementProject Scheduling
Resource Management
P6 ERD + P6 Analytics
Business Process Management (Sample Workflows to be tested in Wave 1)
Integration with SAP Applications (Inspire)
Risk AnalysisQuantitative Risk Analysis
Quantitative Risk Management
Oracle Primavera’s Integrated Program Management for Mega Projects
Portfolio Management(Pilot done on GCD Program delivery in Wave 1)
Proposed
Oracle Universal Content Management(Deployed in Wave 1 ,Until Sharepoint is available in 2012)
Current Ownership (not Enterprise)
Original Vision of Implementation Timeline…
Nov 2010 Initial
Proposal
1st Dec 2010 Contract Award
10th Jan 2011 Wave 1
Commence
31st Mar 2011 UAT
Complete
31st May 2011 Optimized Solution
1st Jun 2011 Wave 2
Commence
30th Sep 2011 Wave 2
Completion
31st Dec 2011 Wave 3
Completion
31st Mar 2012 Wave 4
Completion
Constraints & Difficulties Encountered…
• Tight timelines due to Client Resources not fully
assigned to implementation project
• IT Infrastructure not readily available at time of
implementation
• Misinterpretation of requirements vis-á-vis
centralised system for Head Office Vs Site Set-up
• Dependencies on other projects outside of our scope
Implementation Vision Vs Reality
Vision
Commence With Pilot
4 Environments Required for Pilot• Development
• QA/QC
• Production
• Training
User Acceptance Testing (UAT) Pass Rate 80%
Cookie Cutter Template for Roll-Out
Reality
Commenced With Proof of Concept
Only 1 Environment Available for PoC• As a Result Created Multiple P6 R8
Databases
• Similarly created multiple PCM Databases
Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT) Pass rate 60% before it would be brought
to User Community with
Adjustments/Improvements made
User Acceptance Testing (UAT) Pass rate remained at 80%
Diverse range of needs and
requirements across business
prevented Cookie Cutter Roll-Out
Organization Readiness Vision Vs Reality
Vision
Smooth transition from one Phase of
the Project to next Allow for Continuity of Implementation
Team
Maintain Momentum
Build Close working relationship with
Client counterparts
Reality
Stop-Start Due to Commercial
Restrictions Core Team maintained but numerous
additions of new personnel to team
Lost momentum
Team-building cohesiveness required
Trust between all Consulting parties
Human Change Management
Pitfall
Underestimate at your peril
Outsourced Human Change
Management agent with no visibility to
end user community
Non-Technical Agent unfamiliar with
systems been implemented
Non-assessment of end user
community prior to implementation
Lesson Learned
Human Change Management Agent
must be engaged from the outset
(even before implementation team
assembles onsite)
Preferably Agent should be a member
of the Clients HO team
Agent should have understanding of
concepts and applications
Agent must be able to Walk the Walk
and Talk the Talk with end user
community
Technical Readiness
Vision
IT Infrastructure capable of managing
a Web based centralized solution
Swift and easy access to necessary
Hardware
Installation and IT Configuration within
first 4 – 6 Weeks
Reality
Internet connectivity a challenge
within the continent of Africa
All large organisations move slowly
through paperwork trail
Installation encountered many
problems due to first ever complete
Red Stack Commercial undertaking
Managing Stakeholder Expectations
Pitfall
Assuming who the Stakeholders are
Unclear Scope definition
Poor Project Charter
Unrealistic timelines in the Schedule
Lesson Learned
Draft up a proper Stakeholder Chart Understand who your audience is
Spend the time at the outset
collaborating with the Client on the
drafting of the: Scope
Project Charter
Risk Register
Schedule
Milestone Dates
Communication & Cultural Challenges
Pitfall
We may all speak English but do we
understand one another?
Beware of Acronyms – They don’t
always mean what you think they do SAP WBS = Primavera CBS
Implementation Team was made up
of: South African
American
Spanish
English
German
Irish
Lesson Learned
If people look confused when you are
talking probably because they are!
Better to explain in detail too much
than at a high level too little
Somebody hearing you is not the
same as someone listening to you
Take time out to get to know the
people, culture and background
before assuming as a Consultant you
know it all
Team building extremely important
Earn the trust and respect of the client
• Raymond Poole:
• E: [email protected]
• W: www.pmis.ie
• Follow PMIS Ltd on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn
CONTACT DETAILS…