20170217_recruiting weekend poster final

1
Sensitization of cancer stem cells to chemotherapy through derepression of epigenetically silenced microRNA-203 Keighley Reisenauer, Collin Campion, Joseph Taube Department of Biology, Baylor University References 1. Dent, R., Trudeau, M., Pritchard, K.I., Hanna, W.M., Kahn, H.K., Sawka, C.A., Lickley, L.A., Rawlinson, E., Sun, P., and Narod, S.A. (2007). Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Features and Patterns of Recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 13, 4429–4434. 2. Prat, A., Lluch, A., Albanell, J., Barry, W.T., Fan, C., Chacón, J.I., Parker, J.S., Calvo, L., Plazaola, A., Arcusa, A., et al. (2014). Predicting response and survival in chemotherapy-treated triple-negative breast cancer. Br J Cancer 111, 1532–1541. 3. Cancer Genome Atlas. (2012). Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490, 61–70. 4. Liedtke, C., Mazouni, C., Hess, K.R., André, F., Tordai, A., Mejia, J.A., Symmans, W.F., Gonzalez-Angulo, A.M., Hennessy, B., Green, M., et al. (2008). Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy and Long-Term Survival in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. JCO 26, 1275–1281. 5. Mani, S.A., Guo, W., Liao, M.-J., Eaton, E.N., Ayyanan, A., Zhou, A.Y., Brooks, M., Reinhard, F., Zhang, C.C., Shipitsin, M., et al. (2008). The Epithelial- Mesenchymal Transition Generates Cells with Properties of Stem Cells. Cell 133, 704–715. 6. Perou, C.M. (2011). Molecular Stratification of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers. The Oncologist 16, 61–70. 7. Taube, J.H., Malouf, G.G., Lu, E., Sphyris, N., Vijay, V., Ramachandran, P.P., Ueno, K.R., Gaur, S., Nicoloso, M.S., Rossi, S., et al. (2013). Epigenetic silencing of microRNA-203 is required for EMT and cancer stem cell properties. Scientific Reports 3. Acknowledgements Many thanks to the Taube Lab members for their work in data collection and enthusiastic support. Differential sensitivity to targeted agents Figure 2: Immortalized human mammary epithelial cells (HMLE) and HMLE with a Twist knockout provide ideal models to demonstrate the differences between epithelial and mesenchymal breast cancer subtypes, respectively. These results simulate the effects of CSC-targeted drugs on pre- and post-EMT tumor cells. HMLE Twist cells are modestly more sensitive to treatment with decitabine and vorinostat while, HMLE cells are more sensitive to selumetinib. Hypothesis: miR-203 repression is necessary for acquisition of CSC properties and compounds that interfere with miR-203 suppression have potential as anti-CSC targeted therapies Introduction Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, unlike those with ER-, PR-, or HER2-positive breast cancers, face higher rates of relapse and mortality, primarily due to the lack of targeted therapies 1-3 . While cytotoxic neo-adjuvant chemotherapies prove effective in 70% of patients, the remaining often develop recurrence and/or distant metastases 3,4 . Cancers of epithelial origin grow as tightly compacted tumors, bounded by a basement membrane. In order for metastasis to occur, tumor cells must lose contact with their neighbors, migrate through the extracellular matrix, enter the vasculature, and survive in circulation in a process called epithelial- mesenchymal transition (EMT). In the reverse process, mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) cells exit the vasculature and re-initiate proliferation at a new site to form metastases. Tam and Weinberg; Nature Medicine 2014 TNBCs, while having diverse subtype expression, share several commonalities that chemotherapeutic and xenobiotic compounds target. These basal-like tumors show a high frequency of TP53 mutations and EGFR activity. The PI3K pathway shows increased activity, as well as the RAS-RAF-MET pathway 3,6 . Dean et al., Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2005 Found in these tumors are cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are pervasive and resistant to chemotherapies. The acquisition of CSC properties may be linked to EMT by differentiated tumor cells 5 . Targeting CSCs can help block tumor progression. Compound Mechanism Crizotinib ALK/MET inhibitor Selumetinib MEK-1/ MEK-2 inhibitor Vorinostat HDAC 1 & 3 inhibitor Decitabine Hypomethylation agent Figure 3: Future Direction Signaling Pathways Necessary for CSCs miR-203 repression is required for tumor initiation Voso, et. al. 2014. Haemotologica. EHA. Figure 1: DNA methylation of MIR203 enables acquisition of CSC properties A-D) miR-203 is repressed in CSC-rich fractions of breast cancer cells and restoration of its expression reduces non-adherent growth in vitro and tumor initiation in vivo 7 . E-G) A high-throughput screen was conducted for compounds that elevate expression of a miR- 203 silenced reporter construct in SUM159 cells. Positive controls included the inhibitors of DNA methylation: 5-azaC and decitabine H) Five compounds from this screen were verified to elevate miR-203 expression in MDA- MB-231 cells. Solomon, B. 2015. MET. My Cancer Genome Crizotinib Selumetinib Chemotherapeutic drugs target CSCs through a variety of epigenetic and cancer signaling pathways. Crizotinib and Selumetinib act to block components of the ALK-RAS pathway. This pathway is involved in the proliferation and survival of cells and oftentimes shows amplification in tumor populations. Vorinostat functions as an HDAC inhibitor by binding to the catalytic domain of HDAC 1 and 3. This leads to an accumulation of hyperacetylated histones and transcription factors, resulting in G1 and G2 arrest. Decitabine inhibits transcription by disrupting DNA methyltransferase activity. Vehicle Decitabine mCherry Phase Contrast Screened 320 FDA- approved compounds for loss of miR-203 sensor Vehicle Crizotinib Decitabine Orantinib PLX-4720 Selumetinib Vorinostat 0 5 10 15 20 miR-203 Relative Expression Shown to the left is a double stain of HMLE cells from fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) used in flow cytometry depicting distinct cancer subtypes. Circled in red is a subpopulation with cell markers CD44 hi /CD24 lo , which is consistent with phenotypes of CSCs. Circled in blue is a CD44 lo /CD24 hi subpopulation that matches epithelial tumor cells. Applying these studied compounds at doses less than their IC50 values is expected result in differential sensitivities between the CSCs and epithelial tumor subpopulations. Using miR-203 to repress tumor initiation, in combination with drug therapies, is expected to yield clinically applicable reduction in metastatic. CD44 CD24 E F H G

Upload: keighley-reisenauer

Post on 14-Apr-2017

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 20170217_Recruiting Weekend Poster Final

Sensitization of cancer stem cells to chemotherapy through derepression of epigenetically silenced microRNA-203

Keighley Reisenauer, Collin Campion, Joseph TaubeDepartment of Biology, Baylor University

References1. Dent, R., Trudeau, M., Pritchard, K.I., Hanna, W.M., Kahn, H.K., Sawka, C.A., Lickley, L.A., Rawlinson, E., Sun, P., and Narod, S.A. (2007). Triple-Negative

Breast Cancer: Clinical Features and Patterns of Recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 13, 4429–4434.2. Prat, A., Lluch, A., Albanell, J., Barry, W.T., Fan, C., Chacón, J.I., Parker, J.S., Calvo, L., Plazaola, A., Arcusa, A., et al. (2014). Predicting response and survival in

chemotherapy-treated triple-negative breast cancer. Br J Cancer 111, 1532–1541.3. Cancer Genome Atlas. (2012). Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490, 61–70.4. Liedtke, C., Mazouni, C., Hess, K.R., André, F., Tordai, A., Mejia, J.A., Symmans, W.F., Gonzalez-Angulo, A.M., Hennessy, B., Green, M., et al. (2008). Response

to Neoadjuvant Therapy and Long-Term Survival in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. JCO 26, 1275–1281.5. Mani, S.A., Guo, W., Liao, M.-J., Eaton, E.N., Ayyanan, A., Zhou, A.Y., Brooks, M., Reinhard, F., Zhang, C.C., Shipitsin, M., et al. (2008). The Epithelial-

Mesenchymal Transition Generates Cells with Properties of Stem Cells. Cell 133, 704–715.

6. Perou, C.M. (2011). Molecular Stratification of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers. The Oncologist 16, 61–70.7. Taube, J.H., Malouf, G.G., Lu, E., Sphyris, N., Vijay, V., Ramachandran, P.P., Ueno, K.R., Gaur, S., Nicoloso, M.S., Rossi, S., et al. (2013). Epigenetic

silencing of microRNA-203 is required for EMT and cancer stem cell properties. Scientific Reports 3.

AcknowledgementsMany thanks to the Taube Lab members for their work in data collection and enthusiastic

support.

Differential sensitivity to targeted agents

Figure 2:

Immortalized human mammaryepithelial cells (HMLE) and HMLEwith a Twist knockout provideideal models to demonstrate thedifferences between epithelialand mesenchymal breast cancersubtypes, respectively. Theseresults simulate the effects ofCSC-targeted drugs on pre- andpost-EMT tumor cells. HMLETwist cells are modestly moresensitive to treatment withdecitabine and vorinostat while,HMLE cells are more sensitive toselumetinib.

Hypothesis: miR-203 repression is necessary for acquisition of CSC properties and compounds that

interfere with miR-203 suppression have potential as anti-CSC targeted

therapies

IntroductionTriple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, unlike those withER-, PR-, or HER2-positive breast cancers, face higher rates ofrelapse and mortality, primarily due to the lack of targetedtherapies1-3. While cytotoxic neo-adjuvant chemotherapiesprove effective in 70% of patients, the remaining often developrecurrence and/or distant metastases3,4.

Cancers of epithelial origin grow as tightly compacted tumors,bounded by a basement membrane. In order for metastasis tooccur, tumor cells must lose contact with their neighbors,migrate through the extracellular matrix, enter the vasculature,and survive in circulation in a process called epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). In the reverse process,mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) cells exit thevasculature and re-initiate proliferation at a new site to formmetastases.

Tam and Weinberg; Nature Medicine 2014

TNBCs, while having diverse subtype expression, share severalcommonalities that chemotherapeutic and xenobioticcompounds target. These basal-like tumors show a highfrequency of TP53 mutations and EGFR activity. The PI3Kpathway shows increased activity, as well as the RAS-RAF-METpathway3,6.

Dean et al., Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2005

Found in these tumors are cancer stem cells (CSCs), which arepervasive and resistant to chemotherapies. The acquisition ofCSC properties may be linked to EMT by differentiated tumorcells5. Targeting CSCs can help block tumor progression.

Compound Mechanism

Crizotinib ALK/MET inhibitor

Selumetinib MEK-1/ MEK-2 inhibitor

Vorinostat HDAC 1 & 3 inhibitor

Decitabine Hypomethylation agent

Figure 3: Future DirectionSignaling Pathways Necessary for CSCs

miR-203 repression is required for tumor initiation

Voso, et. al. 2014. Haemotologica. EHA.

Figure 1: DNA methylation of MIR203 enablesacquisition of CSC properties

A-D) miR-203 is repressed in CSC-rich fractionsof breast cancer cells and restoration of itsexpression reduces non-adherent growth invitro and tumor initiation in vivo7.

E-G) A high-throughput screen was conductedfor compounds that elevate expression of a miR-203 silenced reporter construct in SUM159cells. Positive controls included the inhibitors ofDNA methylation: 5-azaC and decitabine

H) Five compounds from this screen wereverified to elevate miR-203 expression in MDA-MB-231 cells.

Solomon, B. 2015. MET. My Cancer

Genome

Crizotinib

Selumetinib

Chemotherapeutic drugs target CSCs through avariety of epigenetic and cancer signaling pathways.Crizotinib and Selumetinib act to block componentsof the ALK-RAS pathway. This pathway is involved inthe proliferation and survival of cells and oftentimesshows amplification in tumor populations. Vorinostatfunctions as an HDAC inhibitor by binding to thecatalytic domain of HDAC 1 and 3. This leads to anaccumulation of hyperacetylated histones andtranscription factors, resulting in G1 and G2 arrest.Decitabine inhibits transcription by disrupting DNAmethyltransferase activity.

Vehicle Decitabine

mC

her

ryP

has

e C

ontr

ast

Screened 320 FDA-approved compounds for

loss of miR-203 sensor

Ve

hi c

l e

Cr i z

ot i

ni b

De

ci t

ab

i ne

Or a

nt i

ni b

PL

X- 4

72

0

Se

l um

et i

ni b

Vo

r i no

st a

t

0

5

1 0

1 5

2 0

m i R - 2 0 3

Re

lativ

e E

xp

re

ss

ion

Shown to the left is a double stain of HMLE cells from fluorescence-activated cellsorting (FACS) used in flow cytometry depicting distinct cancer subtypes. Circled inred is a subpopulation with cell markers CD44hi/CD24lo, which is consistent withphenotypes of CSCs. Circled in blue is a CD44lo/CD24hi subpopulation that matchesepithelial tumor cells.

Applying these studied compounds at doses less than their IC50 values is expectedresult in differential sensitivities between the CSCs and epithelial tumorsubpopulations. Using miR-203 to repress tumor initiation, in combination withdrug therapies, is expected to yield clinically applicable reduction in metastatic.

CD

44

CD24

E

FH G