2014.05.08 why open innovation fails
Upload: whitaker-institute-for-innovation-and-societal-change-national-university-of-ireland-galway
Post on 18-Nov-2014
163 views
DESCRIPTION
Professor Wim Vanhaverbeke, University of Hasselt, Belgium, presented the InterTradeIreland Innovation Lecture entitled "Open Innovation Fails Because Companies Are Not Prepared to Open Up!" at the Whitaker Institute on 8th May 2014TRANSCRIPT
1
Open innovation fails because companies are not prepared to open up
Prof. dr. Wim Vanhaverbeke
Hasselt University ESADE Business School
National University of Singapore
May 6, 2014
What is open innovation (OI)?
2
What is Open Innovation?
“Open innovation is the use of purposive inflows and outflows of knowledge to accelerate internal innovation, and expand the markets for external use of innovation, respectively.”
Chesbrough, Vanhaverbeke, West Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm
(OUP, 2006)
A Closed Innovation System
Research Investigations
Development New Products /Services
The Market
Science &
Technology Base
R D Source: Henry Chesbrough
3
What changed? New Division of Innovation Labor n Increasingly mobile trained workers n More capable universities n Knowledge distributed more widely throughout
the world n Diminished US hegemony in many leading
technology fields n Erosion of oligopoly market positions n Deregulation (EU-liberalization) n Enormous increase in Venture Capital
Source: Henry Chesbrough
Current Market
Internal Technology
Base
R D
Inbound OI: Filling the gaps with external technology
Technology Insourcing
New Market
External Technology
Base External research projects
Venture investing
Technology in-licensing Technology acquisition
Source: H. Chesbrough, Sloan Management Review, Spring 2003
4
Current Market
Internal Technology
Base
R D
Outbound OI: Profiting from others’ use of your technology
Technology Insourcing
New Market
Technology Spin-offs
External Technology
Base
Other Firm’s Market
Licensing
Source: H. Chesbrough, Sloan Management Review, Spring 2003
Extension of the original model
By combining open / closed innovation with open / closed business models
5
Business models - Chesbrough (2006)
n Performs two important functions: u it creates value, and u it captures a portion of that value
n Creation of value: by defining a range of activities that will yield a new product or service valued by a (target) customer group
n Value capturing: by establishing a unique resource, asset or position within that series of activities where the firm enjoys a competitive advantage
Open business models - Chesbrough (2006)
Open business model:
u create greater value by leveraging more ideas (external ideas)
u capture greater value by using key asset, resource, or position not only in the company’s own business but also in other companies’ businesses
6
Innovation
Business Model
Outside in
Open
Closed
Closed
Inside out
Unused technology
used by others
(Glad at P&G)
Technology licensed to strengthen own BM
(IBM- Linux)
Closed innovation
model (Tide in P&G - Foat glass in Pilkington)
Search for assets
owned by others (iPhone)
Use others’ technology
for own products
(iPod – Swiffer at P&G)
Use others’ technology for VNPs
(Orchestrator:Curana / KLM
SkyNRG)
7
Innovation
Business Model
Outside in
Open
Closed
Closed
Inside out
Unused technology
used by others
(Glad at P&G)
Technology licensed to strengthen own BM
(IBM- Linux)
Closed innovation
model (Tide in P&G - Foat glass in Pilkington)
Search for assets
owned by others (iPhone)
Use others’ technology
for own products
(iPod – Swiffer at P&G)
Use others’ technology for VNPs
(Orchestrator:Curana / KLM
SkyNRG)
• KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, the North Sea Group and Spring Associates joined forces and founded SkyNRG in Nov 2009.
n Goal: to help create and accelerate the development of a market for sustainable jet fuel (safe, sustainable and affordable) & avoid large price swings in petro-based kerosene
n Creating a viable market for sustainable jet fuels for aviation can only be achieved by combining expertise and experience in the fields of air transport, product knowledge, R & D, regulation and effective sustainability criteria
n SkyNRG is the hub firm in the ecosystem
8
SkyNRG
Financial world
(VCs…)
Airline industry
Govern-mental
agencies
Biofuel value chain
KLM’s value driver? KLM profits as a
customer of a steady supply of sustainable and affordable biofuel
Open innovation: SkyNRG sets up the aviation
biofuel value chain and drives the acceleration of
joint technological innovations between
partners
9
Broadening the scope n OI when it is not related to your NPD:
u You are a service company with no technical expertise
u SME with insufficient technological expertise u Government agency:
t Nasa: new technologies may help you a lot in your mission as space agency
n Insourcing knowledge of others in an indirect way through an open business model (OBM)
What if your products are commodities?
n BP pumps crude oil from wells and produces petro products (commodities)
n Product innovation is not a value driver n Oil well exploration and extraction are major
value drivers n Collaborate with Schlumberger and others
technology services to advance their technology in order to find the best wells earlier than competitors.
10
Strategy as ecosystem building
n Multiple partners in a network innovation ecosystem
n Health of your company depends in the health of your ecosystem
n Nurturing your ecosystem is necessary n Nambisan and Sawhney; Network-centric
innovation, AMP, 2011 u Tasks: - Innovation leverage
– Innovation coherence – Innovation appropriability
n The wide lens – Ron Adner
OI and SMEs
11
Low tech industries: A fruitful place for OI by SMEs
Jaga n Differentiation vs. competition through:
u Eco-radiators u Design-radiators
n The company is not selling products but experiences, ideas, values, etc….
n Differences: u radiators as heating machines u radiators to reduce carbon-footprint u radiator as a creative part of the house, heating
the "soul"
12
Some JAGA products
48
Jaga Oxygen : controlling temperature,
moisture and oxygen in the house
Wearable heating?
Some JAGA products
13
Jaga Experience Lab : JEL - Product: test-facility
- Experience: test and develop your own products
- Jaga invites professors & engineers worldwide
- Low cost form of publicity: new projects as Federation Tower / Telefonica
Open innovation # 1
Experience Strategy
14
Open innovation #2 Jaga Product days 2007 n Total number of projects: 119 n Total number of products by 1 or more designers/engineers: 70 n Total number of products created by non professionals: 49 n Total number of solo projects*: 95
u created by a designer/engineer: 47 u made by non professionals: 48
n Number of Jaga Product days ideas taken into production within 6 months: 6 *= Created by only one person
25/05/14 Wim Vanhaverbeke 52
Jaga products days
15
Example: Play radiator
25/05/14 Wim Vanhaverbeke 54
Example: The play radiator
16
• Birth of an entire city BLACK ROCK CITY in the Black Rock Desert in Nevada
• 40.000 people
• a cross-pollination of art, music, theatre, sensation
• wonderful creations > go up in flames at the end of the 3 weeks
Open innovation #3 Uchronians and the Burning Man
17
www.uchronians.org
Start of the creative (internet) community
Open innovation in services: Example: Pet insurance! Example: KLM jet service! § New technological applications +
redesigning the VC
18
How to manage OI?
An example: How to cooperate with high-tech
start-ups?
How to manage open innovation
How to source external technology? An example of corporate venturing u BM / strategy but not organization
structure, culture, dynamics of corporate strategy, routines, internal technology transfers t External Venturing @ DSM
19
How to organize for OI? External Venturing at XYZ § Pitfall : Large firm invests in a start-up and uses its
financial participation as a power tool to enforce cooperation on terms of the investing company
Start-up
XYZ-BU XYZ-V
Is it an interesting investment? Yes? Then a minority participation
Once there is a financial participation there is no ex ante deal how to handle the transfer of technology!
How to organize for OI? External Venturing at DSM § Rationale:
§ Strategic return, not a financial return § One of the BU should benefit from it
§ Therefore: Negotiation is a three way negotiation There are two deals packaged into one
overall deal
Start-up
DSM-BU DSM-V
1. Option creation: Is it an interesting investment?
2. Option exercising: Can the new technology create a new business in the future?
20
Strategic use of IP in open innovation
Some non ICT-examples
License scheme of Bekaert & Continental (technical standards)
Bekaert Continental
Other clients
Other suppliers
Proposal: • X = …% of net sales value of supplied product • Supplier collects royalties • Cross-license agreement between client and supplier implying:
• Bekaert to supply "other clients" at X% • "Other suppliers" to supply the Continental at X% • Bekaert grants sublicenses to "other suppliers". The latter can supply to
"other clients" at 2X%
0%
x %
2x %
100% 100% 60%: compensation for licensing activities 40%
21
embryonic potential growth mature declining/ obsolete
Collaborative research Own Research
technology life cycle
potential
generic technology
application oriented
IP policy: IMEC’s position in the technology life cycle
time
Long term – many options
short term applications
low high R&D expenditures
Know- ledge
Know- ledge focus
academic institutions
focus industrial actors
IP policy: Imec's bridge function between academic institutions and industry
22
IP policy: IMEC Industrial Affiliation Program
n What u R&D cooperation in generic technologies u Strategic program develop by IMEC and executed in IMEC u IIAP partners send guest researcher(s) to IMEC
n Advantages u Sharing costs, risks, research infrastructure, IP u IIAP partners get access to:
- IMEC’s background knowledge - selected results of other partners in IIAP
u bilateral contract within the framework of IIAP n Leverages
u resources u knowledge u cross-fertilization of research of different partners u shortening time to market
IIAP foreground knowledge
partner B
partner C
partner …
partner A
IMEC IIAP
background knowledge
knowledge developed within the program
common IP (R1 - R1*)
co-owned – non-exclusive license partner IP (R2) exclusive license
IMEC IP (Ro) non-exclusive
licensing
IP policy: IIAP – Generic framework
23
Managing the transition from closed to open innovation
Objectives
102
24
Lewin’s organizational change model
1. Unfreezing: u The first phase is concerned with the establishment of a sense of urgency
for change, the establishment of a ‘guiding coalition’ for championing it and the creation and communication of the new vision to both internal and external stakeholders.
2. Moving: u The second phase concerns the actual implementation of change, through
the establishment of new procedures and patterns of behavior consistent with the new vision, eventually acting on budget constraints, targets, schedules and reward systems. Characterized by an experimental approach.
3. Institutionalizing: u The third phase involves the institutionalization of the new order, through
consolidating improvements achieved to prevent a slip back to the antecedent status quo 103
Managerial levers for OI n Understanding the anatomy of the process from Closed to
Open Innovation requires identification of the dimensions along which change occurs identifies four dimensions
n Dimensions:
u Networks, u Organizational structures u Evaluation processes and knowledge u Knowledge management systems
104
25
Phasing open innovation
Outside-in dimension
Unfreezing Moving Institutionalizing
Networks Exploitation of individual social networks, particularly for developing relationships with universities and research centres
Creation of an exploration network, through a switch of existing individual social networks to the firm level
Establishment of long-term forms of collaboration with universities and research centres
Organizational structures
Evaluation processes
Knowledge management systems
105
Phasing open innovation Outside-in dimension
Unfreezing Moving Institutionalizing
Networks
Organizational structures
Achievement of a strong commitment from the firm’s top management.. Separation of R&D activities from existing technical assistance. Creation of an independent IP Office within the firm Identification of an OI champion
Establishment of a dedicated organizational unit for managing collaborations with universities. Identification of a pilot project (well defined and separate from the rest of the firm’s innovation activities) to serve as experimental field for the implementation of OI.
Creation of the role of gatekeepers for monitoring the development of technologies and scientific advances in the areas of interest for the firm. Identification of the main areas of research and establishment of innovation champions for each of them.
Evaluation processes
Knowledge management systems
106
26
Phasing open innovation
Outside-in dimension
Unfreezing Moving Institutionalizing
Networks
Organizational structures
Evaluation processes
Establishment of regular meetings for validating and monitoring innovation projects developed within the firm
Introduction of explicit evaluation procedures to assess the potential for accessing external sources of knowledge, particularly within the existing exploration network
Adoption of general indicators and eventually of derived innovation performance measures for project managers
Knowledge management systems
107
Phasing open innovation
Outside-in dimension
Unfreezing Moving Institutionalizing
Networks
Organizational structures
Evaluation processes
Knowledge management systems
Start to file patents leveraging knowledge already existing within the firm.
Adoption of ICT systems (intranet, videoconference, project management tools) for increasing project team interoperability
Assessment of internal knowledge, eventually explicitly included into the firm’s strategic plan
108
27
Phasing open innovation Inside-out dimension
Unfreezing Moving Institutionalizing
Networks Using personal networks to explore potentially interested parties for licensing deals, spin-offs, sale of technology, divestments
Creation of an firm level exploitation network, involving key customers
---
Organizational structures
Creation of a new organizational unit for better linking R&D and commercial functions
Evaluation processes
Involvement of a new unit linking R&D and commercial functions into the initial screening of innovation projects
Introduction of a formal evaluation procedure for co-development projects with customers or other value partners
Knowledge management systems
Assessment of individual R&D projects that can find and external route to market
Assessment of licensing competences into the IP Office Filing 109
AN OI MANAGEMENT MATURITY FRAMEWORKS
Frank Mattes / Forrester (www.innovationmanagement.se ) Ellen Enkel, John Bell and Hannah Hogenkamp, (2011), OI maturity framework, IJIM, 15 (6), 1161–1189
110
28
Open Innovation maturity model with four stages (1/2) n Stage I: Experimentation.
u This stage is characterized by initiatives driven by single Business Units, by a project-based resource allocation and by pilot runs with selected new open approaches to innovation. 60% of firms are in this stage (Forrester).
n Stage II: Commitment. u The second stage is achieved, when there is a CxO support for
Open Innovation, formal resources are reserved for Open Innovation, the first steps towards organizational embedding are taken and preliminary cost-benefit analyses are done. 30% of firms are in this stage (Forrester).
Open Innovation maturity model with four stages (2/2)
n Stage III: Sustainable state. u This stage is characterized by a CxO mandate for OI,
significant formal resources allocated to OI, solid cost-benefit analyses in place and continuous use of new open approaches to innovation. 9% of firms have achieved this stage (Forrester).
n Stage IV: Full integration. u The final stage of Open Innovation maturity is characterized by
the traits of stage III plus cultural embedding of OI, well-defined and well-managed innovation networks, seamless integration of Open Innovation, and shareholder value justification of the investment in Open Innovation. Maximal 1% of the firms are in this stage (Forrester).
29
Elements in the maturity analysis
117
OI Maturity analysis: immature firm
118
30
OI Maturity analysis: mature firm
119
Restructuring companies as a silent driver of OI
Philips Natlab
R&D center Applied technologies
Running businesses
R&D OI campus Applied
technologies
Running businesses
• Downsizing • Other functions • Inbound OI • Lic & spin-offs • OI campus
• Profit center • Downsizing • Ext & int clients • Manage rel. with BU
• In-sourcing • Looser link with R&D and AT • Manage rel. with AT
31
OI: New frontiers and applications
Edited by: Henry Chesbrough, Wim Vanhaverbeke Joel West
2003
2006
2006 2008 2011
2013 2011
Exnovate as a network of excellence for OI-practitioners and scholars? n www.exnovate.org n An international network of excellence on Open and
Collaborative Innovation n Projects
u PhD course OI in ESADE (5th time – 20-22 Janaury Barcelona, 2014)
u CE and OI Masterclass 10 times already; 12th time at ESADE Barcelona last week of May 2014)
u Study on open innovation metrics u Using best practices to improve OI in SMEs u …
32
http://www.innovationmanagement.se/welcome-to-the-the-mooi-project/
http://www.exnovate.org/