2 multiobjective optimisation in engine design
TRANSCRIPT
The Test Engine
• 4-stroke 4 cylinder 2.2L • Bore: 93mm; stroke: 81mm; compression ratio: 8.9 • 2 valves per cylinder • Port injection• Combustion: Wiebe function (with spark trimming
simulated by the 50% burn point parameter)• In-cylinder heat transfer modeled by Woschni
model and in-cylinder wall temperatures are fixed at specified values for WOT and 5000 rpm.
Optimization of SI Engine
Inputs:
2o30o-10o50% Burn Point(TH50)
10 mm400 mm100 mmIntake Runner Length (INTRUN)
5o151o101oExhaust Cam
Timing(EXHCAM)
5o264o214oIntake Cam Timing(INTCAM)
Step SizeMaximum Value
Minimum ValueVariable
Run Statistics
• Population Size: 20• Number of Generations: 100• Total Number of Simulations: 2000• Algorithm: MOGA / NSGA
(Genetic Algorithms)• Time: Approx 15 hours on
DELL Inspiron 8500, 2.4 GHZ
Case 1 – Correlation matrix
• EXHCAM is to be maximised for MinBSFC but minimised for MinNOX (most important)
• TH50 is to be minimised for MinBSFC but maximised for MinNOX
• INTCAM, INTRUNLENGTH are to be maximised for MinBSFC (less important for NOX)
Case 2 – Correlation matrix
• EXHCAM is to be maximised for MaxBKM but minimised for MinNOX
• TH50 is to be maximised for MinNOX (and less important for BKW)
• INTCAM and INTRUNLENGTH are less significant
Case 3 – Correlation matrix
• EXHCAM is to be maximised for MaxBKM but minimised for MinNOX
• TH50 is to be maximised for MinNOX (and less important for BKW)
• INTCAM and INTRUNLENGTH are less significant