2. lta logistics vs enrique varona (defendants counter claim)
DESCRIPTION
American hero whistleblower employee fights back and countersues LTA Logistics. To settle old scores and seek justice. As the great Chinese philosopher named Confucious who invented the confusion said, "The best defense is a good offense". Contrary to their bogus SLAPP lawsuit I do have a case, exhibits, and evidence of my claims. Looking for a hefty payoff of US $600,000.00 ++++ My victory is far away, but it is far away somewhere....like the Bon Jovi Song says, "have a little patience uhuhuh"...TRANSCRIPT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11™ JUDICIAL CIRCUITIN AND FOR DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA
GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION
CASE NO. 11205227
LTA LOGISTICS, INC.A Florida Corporation, andLESTER TRIMINOPlaintiff,
ENRIQUE JOSE VARONADefendant,
DEFENDANT'S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM FOR TOURTOUS INTERFERENCE WITH A
BUSINESS ADVANTAGE, CIVIL CONSPIRACY FOR TORTOUS INTERFERENCE WITH A
BUSINESS ADVANTAGE, FRAUD, AND EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
Defendant, Enrique J Varona a pro se litigant (from hereon "Varona"), couterclaims
and sues Plaintiff, LTA Logistics, Inc and LESTER TRIMINO (from hereon, "LTA /
Trimino"), for Tortous interference with a business relationship, civil conspiracy to
commit the same, forgery, fraud, on the following grounds and allegations, and
states the following:
INTRODUCTION
1). LTA/ Trimino has sued Varona for Damages, count I requests a temporary and
permanent injunctive relief, on count II claims tortous interference with a business
relationship and money damages for an alleged breach of a non-disclosure and non-
solicitation agreement as stated in their original complaint see i.d. (10) The alleged
breach as per LTA / Trimino consisted on some videos posted in You Tube on the
Internet.
2) On July 8, 2011 LTA/ Trimino served their complaint on Varona
3) On July 12, 2011 Varona filed a Motion to Dismiss LTA/ Trimino's complaint
4) On July 19, 2011 Varona filed a Counter Claim to LTA/Trimino's suit for Tortous
Interference with a Business Relationship, Civil Conspiracy and Fraud.
5) On August 2, 2011 LTA/ Trimino filed a Motion to Dismiss Varona's Counter
Claim .
6) On August 8, 2011 Varona filed an answer of Affirmative Defense in response
to the complaint and LTA/Trimino's claims and allegations.
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
8) On March 16, 2010 Varona entered into an "Independent Contractor
Agreement for Sales Agent" with Landstar Ranger, Inc d/b/a/ Landstar
Transportation Logistics, Inc (from hereon "Landstar"). see attached executed
contract as Exhibit "A"
9) On June 30, 2010 Varona received a call from Mr. Justin Norman, Landstar
regional sales manager for south Florida. Mr. Norman informed Varona that LTA /
Trimino had sent Landstar corporate headquarters located in Jacksonville Fl, a four
page fax of an alleged non disclosure non solicitation agreement between LTA /
Trimino and Varona. See email from Mr. Norman as Exhibit "B".
10) Mr. Norman told Varona he had received from a Mrs. Vandivier, Landstar's
Director of Agent Contract Administration at corporate a copy of a non solicitation
non disclosure agreement dated November 5, 2009 sent to her via fax by LTA /
Trimino. See Exhibit "D".
11) Varona stated to Mr. Norman and Mrs. Vandivier that he had not entered into
such an agreement with LTA / Trimino. Varona determined that the alleged
signature in the alleged agreement was a forged signature of his. See Exhibit "B"
12) Mrs. Vandivier did her own comparison of signatures with other signed
documents provided to her by Varona and agreed that the signature in the contract
that LTA / Trimino had sent to her was not that of Varona. Mrs Vandivier told Varona
that she was going to contact LTA / Trimino and tell them she could not confirm
Varona's signature. See Exhibit "E".
14) Mrs. Vandivier informed LTA / Trimino that she was not going to take his calls
anymore and to stop calling her. LTA / Trimino called often and left threatening
messages on Mrs. Vandivier's voice mail. This behavior by LTA / Trimino went on for
a period of over 10 weeks. See Exhibit "J"
13) On August 8, 2010 Varona received a phone call from Mr. Richard A. Clark
Vice President and Assistant General Counsel for Landstar. Mr. Clark informed
Varona that LTA/ Trimino via an attorney had sent Landstar's President Mr. Gattoni
a letter informing him of the alleged non soliciting non disclosure agreement between
LTA/ Trimino and Varona.
15) On August 9, 2010 Varona received via UPS a letter from Mr. Clark, with the
letter dated July 26, 2010 sent to Landstar's President by LTA/ Trimino's attorney. A
Mr. James K. Pedley, See Exhibit "F"
16) The Letter from LTA/ Trimino's attorney now contained a new allegation that
had never been raised before, that there were three witnesses to Varona's alleged
signing of the LTA / Trimino non solicitation and non disclosure agreement. The
alleged witnesses were Mrs. Annette Trimino Vice president of LTA and wife of Lester
Trimino and Mr. Todd Osipiak the Sales Manager at LTA. See attorneys letter as
Exhibit "G".
17) On August 16, 2010 Varona received via UPS a letter from Landstar
terminating their relationship with him. In a phone conversation with Mr. Charlie
Piatt Vice President of Landstar Transportation Logistics, Inc Varona was told that
their decision was due to the actions, allegations, behavior of LTA / Trimino. See
Termination letter as exhibit "H".
COUNT I TORTOUS INTERFERENCE WITH BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP
18) Varona re alleges and incorporates by reference all the allegations in
paragraphs 1 through 17 as though fully set forth.
19) Under Florida law the elements of tortous interference with a business
relationship are the existence of the relationship, knowledge of the relationship by
the transgressor, and intentional and unjustified interference with the relationship
and the resulting damage to the victim; see Ethan Allen, Inc vs Georgetown Manor,
Inc., 647 So.2d 812, 814 (fla.1994).
20) Varona had a business relationship which afforded him the right to represent
Landstar the largest and most recognized motor carrier in the United States as a
sales agent as evidenced by the independent contractor agreement for sales agency
see Exhibit "A".
21) LTA / Trimino learned of Varona's employment at Landstar and contacted
corporate on numerous occasions as proved by Exhibits "B", through "H" and "J".
22) LTA / Trimino intentionally and unjustifiably interfered with Varona's
relationship with Landstar, going as far as to produce a forged contract to undermine
his credibility and reputation with his new employer.
23) As a result of LTA / Trimino's efforts and actions Varona was terminated
from his employment and suffered irreparable economic loss and multiple damages
both financially as well a a loss of reputation in the market and with his customers.
24) LTA/ Trimino over a period of three months carried a campaign to discredit
Varona and harass his employer Landstar by calling them after being told to cease
and desist, by forging Varona's signature on a non soliciting and non disclosure
agreement, by having his wife Mrs. Annette Trimino and their sales manager
conspire about having witnessed Varona signing the alleged agreement.
25) All these actions by LTA / Trimino prove that they acted intentionally to
disrupt the relationship between Landstar and Varona, thus establishes the tort of
tortous interference see (Ibid., quoting from Buckallo v. Johnson, supra, 14 cal.3d at
827.)
26) Varona's lost of his right to lawfully represent Landstar constituted an
economic loss and that such loss or economic advantage was due to LTA / Triminos
actions (/oust v Longo (1987) 43 Cat. 3d 64, 71).
COUNT II TOURTOUS INTERFERENCE WITH A BUSINESS ADVANTAGE
27) Varona re alleges and incorporates by reference all the allegations in
paragraphs 1 through 26 as though fully set forth.
28) Under Florida law the elements of tortous interference with a business
relationship are the existence of the relationship, knowledge of the relationship by
the transgressor, and intentional and unjustified interference with the relationship
and the resulting damage to the victim; see Ethan Allen, Inc vs Georgetown Manor,
Inc., 647 So.2d 812, 814 (fla. 1994).
29) On August 2, 2010 Varona entered into a 8.U.S commission agreement/
contract with Landstar Global Logistics, Inc (from hereon "Landstar2"), copy of the
contract is entered as Exhibit "I".
30) Varona suffered the loss of this business relationship for the reasons stated
above. In paragraphs 19 through 25.
COUNT III CIVIL CONSPIRACY FOR TORTOUS INTERFERENCE WITH AN ADVATEGOUS
BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP
31) Varona re alleges and incorporates by reference all the allegations in
paragraphs 1 through 29 as though fully set forth.
32) On or about July, 2010 LTA / Trimino , Mrs. Annnette Trimino Vice
president of LTA and wife of Lester Trimino and Mr. Todd Osipiak the sales manager
knowingly and willfully conspired and agreed among themselves to claim to have
witnessed Varona sign a non solicitation and non disclosure agreement dated
November 5, 2009.
33) This conspiracy is evidenced by Exhibit "F".
34) The elements of an action for civil conspiracy are the formation and
operation of the conspiracy and damage resulting to plaintiff from an act or acts done
in furtherance of the common design. ... In such an action the major significance of
the conspiracy lies in the fact that it renders each participant in the wrongful act
responsible as a joint tortfeasor for all damages ensuing from the wrong, irrespective
of whether or not he was a direct actor and regardless of the degree of his activity."
(Doctors' Co. v. Superior Court (1989) 49 Cal.Sd 44, citing Mox Incorporated v.
Woods (1927) 202 Cal. 675, 677-78.)' (Id. at 511.)
35) Varona alleges that it was the "peculiar power of coercion" possessed by the
conspirators Lester Trimino, Annette Trimino,and Todd Osipiak, by virtue of their
combination, which Trimino alone had not been able to accomplish prior to their
letter (Exhibt "F") that was the direct cause of the resulting losses to him see
Charruca V Miami jai Alai, Inc. 353 So. 2d 547 (FLA 1977) and Snipes v. West
Flagler Kennel Club, Inc., 105 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 1958)
36) The fact is that the result of the defendant's concerted actions were different
from anything that could have been accomplished separately see Kee v Nat'/
Reserve Life Insurance Co, 918 F2d 1538,1541-42 (11th cir, 1990).
37) LTA/Trimino, Lester Trimino, Mrs. Annette Trimino and their sales manager
Mr. Todd Osipiak who was the immediate supervisor of Varona are each a
participant in the wrongful act responsible as a joint tortfeasor for all damages
ensuing from the wrong, irrespective of whether or not he was a direct actor and
regardless of the degree of his activity." (Doctors' Co. v. Superior Court (1989) 49
Cal.3d 44, citing Mox Incorporated v. Woods (1927) 202 Cat. 675, 677-78.)' (Id. at
511.)
38) LTA / Trimino, Mrs. Annette Trimino,and Mr. Todd Osipiak, are in breach of
their fiduciary obligations to Varona as an ex employee which is recognized by law
and is potentially subject to liability for breach of that duty.' (Allied Equipment Corp. v.
Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd., supra, 7 Cal.4th at 510-11.)
39) Varona claims a civil conspiracy because more than two persons conspired
for the purpose of willfully and maliciously injuring his reputation, trade, business and
profession which resulted in him being terminated by Landstar and him suffering
great economic loss.
COUNT IV FRAUD
40) Varona re alleges and incorporates by reference all the allegations in
paragraphs 1 through 39 as though fully set forth.
41) Varona alleges that LTA / Trimino intentionally participated in a scheme to
defraud him of his position with Landstar, that by sending a number of emails and
copies via fax of fraudulent contracts with forged signatures as demonstrated in
exhibit "B" through "H" and "J" and in addition the use of electronic mail in
furtherance of that scheme see American Dental, 605 F 3d at 1290 (quotation
omitted).
42) Varona alleges that the circumstances, the precise statements, documents,
and misrepresentations made by LTA/ Trimino at the time, place and person whom
the statements were made to and by who the statements were made by, as well as
the statements context and manner in which the statements misled Varonas
employer in addition to LTA / Trimino achieving their goal of having Varona
terminated from his employment are evident in Exhibits "B" through "H" and "J".
COUNT V EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
43) Varona re alleges and incorporates by reference all the allegations in
paragraphs 1 through 42 as though fully set forth.
44) Varona alleges that he was treated or terminated in an unfair, abusive,
coercive, and retaliatory manner.
45) Varona alleges that LTA / Trimino intentionally inflicted emotional distress
through his conduct which was extreme and outrageous, The actions of LTA /
Trimino were the direct cause of Varona's distress and such distress was severe.
46) According to the Restatement (Second) of Torts, "[o]ne who by extreme and
outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress to another is
subject to liability for such emotional distress.
47) Varona alleges that LTA/Trimino behaved in an extreme conduct by engaging on
a three month campaign to harass certain high level executives at Landstar corporate,
including the president of the company, by continually calling and leaving threatening
messages on voice mail, by going as far as to falsify or forge a signature on a contract /
agreement, and by hiring an attorney to send a letter claiming to have witnesses to
Varona signing of the agreement, and ending with Varona being terminated from his
employment at Landstar that :LTA/ Trimino have engaged in emotional distress see Prosser
and Keeton explain that: [s]o far as it is possible to generalize from the Restatement
(Second) of Torts, conduct is considered to be extreme and outrageous "only where the
conduct has been so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, so as to go beyond
all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a
civilized community."
For the reasons set forth hereinabove, Enrique Jose Varona demands and prays
that this honorable Court enter its judgment against LTA/ Trimino, wherefore on
Counts I and II Tortous Interference with a business advantage, Counts III Civil
Conspiracy for Tortous Interference with a business advantage , Count IV Fraud,
Count, V Emotional Distress, for (1) Damages, including lost wages and
consequential damages U.S. $ 100,000.00 (2) prejudgment interest (3) punitive
damages in the amount of U.S. $500,000.00 (4) attorneys fees and reasonable
litigating costs (5) any such other relief and further relief as this court deems just
and proper.
\Respectfully submitted,
Defendant14823 S.W. 125 CourtMiami, Florida 33186
TRUTH AFFIDAVITIN THE NATURE OF SUPPLEMENTAL
RULES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND MARITIME CLAIMS RULES C(6)
In Commerce, everything must be stated in Truth. I, Enrique Varona, a Sovereign, aPrivate Person, a Living Soul, a Creditor, Claimant, and Secured Party and NOT aSTATUTORY PERSON upon the land of Florida, a Republic in the county calledMiami-Dade, do hereby solemnly declare, say, and state. (1) Secured Party iscompetent for stating the matters set forth herewith; (2) Secured Party has personalknowledge about the facts stated herein; (3) Everything stated in this TRUTHAFFIDAVIT is the Truth, the Whole Truth, and nothing but the Truth and all stated istrue, correct, complete, and not misleading.
1) I Enrique Jose Varona do hereby declare under penalty of perjury that all the
statements made in this counter claim are truthful to the best of my knowledge.
2) All the evidence presented to this court such as Exhibits and other statements in
this counter claim are legitimate documents.
3) I am over 18 years of age, and reside in Dade County, Miami Florida.
4) That I worked for LTA/ Trimino from June 2009 through March 2010.
5) That all the events that I relate in this complaint happened as I describe them.
6) That I never entered into or signed a non disclosure non solicitation agreement
with LTA Logistics, Inc or Lester Trimino dated November 5, 2009.
7) That I have never entered into a campaign to harm LTA Logistics or its owners or
corporate officers.
NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS AND NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS.
Enriqu^ Jo^e Varona, GRANTORSEClfRED-PARTY SIGNATURE
A J&Enrique Jose Varona, Agent,
The forgoing was acknowledge sworn and subscribed before me this<.2__ day of
August, 2011 by Enrique Jose Varona who is personally known to me or has
produced/^-^/-^J^y^7 -frf-?//' O as identification and who id take
an oath, ^//e 2?/ 9^046 s*/ Ctf//.
My Comission Expires on: Notary State of Florida
Comm# DD0677888
Expires 9/16/2011Florida Notary Assn.. Inc