Section 2 Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

X:\09101-00\06001\tech\final\WPC\080807A_Vol 2.doc 236

2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges This section includes a list of bridges recommended not eligible for listing in the National Register. The list arranges bridges alphabetically by county and numerically by bridge number (state bridges followed by county bridges). Additional identification information includes the NBI number and latitude and longitude coordinates (when available), and bridge subtype (NBI/INDOT code and type), and the survey date, if applicable. The list includes statements to describe if each bridge is eligible under Criteria A and C. Under each criterion, a bridge may possess significance for multiple rationales as described in the National Register evaluation system.

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(218)118-01-01822A Not eligible29030Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 394 85 20

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 218 Feature Crossed: WABASH RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(218)118-01-03414A Not eligible29020Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 394 85 22

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 218 Feature Crossed: WABASH RIVER OVERFLOW

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(33)527-01-01609 Not eligible108703Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 482 84 530

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: US 33 Feature Crossed: YELLOW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(33)527-01-01610 Not eligible10860Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 461 84 494

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: US 33 Feature Crossed: BLUE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

027-01-05186A Not eligible7400Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 422 84 574

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: US 27 Feature Crossed: BLUE CREEK

237

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

101-01-04570B Not eligible25130Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 468 84 506

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 101 Feature Crossed: ST. MARY'S RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

224-01-01546 Not eligible29120Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 500 84 574

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 224 Feature Crossed: HOLTHOUSE DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00005 Not eligible0100004Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 53.6 084 49.4

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: ROAD 600 EAST Feature Crossed: STAUB DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00020 Not eligible0100018Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 53.3 084 54.0

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: ROAD 1000 NORTH Feature Crossed: GERKE DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00041 Not eligible0100033Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 50.8 084 56.8

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: WINCHESTER ROAD Feature Crossed: HOLTHOUSE DITCH

238

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00043 Not eligible0100035Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 49.5 084 59.1

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: ROAD 550 NORTH Feature Crossed: HOLTHOUSE DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00054 Not eligible0100141Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 49.0 084 54.5

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SALEM RD(OLD US33) Feature Crossed: BORUM RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00055 Not eligible0100142Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 48.8 084 53.9

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SALEM RD(OLD US33) Feature Crossed: BRAUN AYRES DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00058 Not eligible0100043Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 49.0 085 00.8

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: ROAD 500 NORTH Feature Crossed: HOLTHOUSE DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00059 Not eligible0100044Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 48.7 085 00.9

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: ROAD 400 WEST Feature Crossed: HOLTHOUSE DITCH

239

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00062 Not eligible0100046Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 48.1 085 01.1

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: ROAD 400 NORTH Feature Crossed: HOLTHOUSE DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00067 Not eligible0100050Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 47.9 084 49.8

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: PIQUA ROAD Feature Crossed: DRAKE DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00074 Not eligible0100055Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 47.3 085 00.2

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: ROAD 300 NORTH Feature Crossed: BEERY DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00080 Not eligible0100061Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 46.2 084 52.8

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: ROAD 300 EAST Feature Crossed: YELLOW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00088 Not eligible0100067Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 45.6 084 52.3

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: ROAD 100 NORTH Feature Crossed: MARTZ CREEK

240

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00103 Not eligible0100080Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 42.9 084 58.4

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: ROAD 200 WEST Feature Crossed: BLUE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00105 Not eligible0100081Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 42.3 084 56.2

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: ROAD 000 E/W Feature Crossed: BLUE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00106 Not eligible0100082Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 43.1 084 49.6

Steel pony truss310A

//Feature Carried: ROAD 200 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BLUE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00109 Not eligible0100085Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 42.1 084 51.2

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SALEM ROAD Feature Crossed: BLUE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00112 Not eligible0100088Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 41.8 084 54.7

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: ROAD 350 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BLUE CREEK

241

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00114 Not eligible0100090Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 42.2 084 55.9

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: ROAD 300 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BLUE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00117 Not eligible0100093Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 40.4 084 54.5

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: ROAD 150 EAST Feature Crossed: HABEGGER DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00139 Not eligible0100149Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 39.0 084 51.5

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: SALEM ROAD Feature Crossed: PJ BRYAN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00151 Not eligible0100151Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 35.5 084 56.6

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: ROAD 1050 SOUTH Feature Crossed: LOBLOLLY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00501 Not eligible0100130Adams NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 50.1 084 55.3

Cont prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

605

//Feature Carried: JACKSON STREET Feature Crossed: ST. MARYS RIVER

242

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(30)33-02-04549B Not eligible8740Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 74 85 113

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: US 30 (33 & SR930) Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(930)30-02-00966A Not eligible8830Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 42 85 17

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 930 Feature Crossed: TRIER DITCH

This bridge is an example of a variation, evolution, or transition that is conveyed through features or innovations related to bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

(930)30-02-02164BEBL

Not eligible8800Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 45 85 53

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: SR 930 EBL Feature Crossed: N & S RAILROAD

This bridge is an example of a variation, evolution, or transition that is conveyed through features or innovations related to bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

(930)30-02-02164CWBL

Not eligible8805Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 45 85 53

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: SR 930 WBL Feature Crossed: N & S RAILROAD

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(930)30-02-02190A Not eligible8820Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 43 85 43

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 930 Feature Crossed: N & S RAILROAD

243

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(930)30-02-03375B Not eligible8750Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 71 85 98

Composite steel beam302G

//Feature Carried: SR 930 Feature Crossed: SPY RUN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(930)30-02-03376AEBL

Not eligible8770Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 69 85 70

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: SR 930 EBL Feature Crossed: ST. JOSEPH RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(930)30-02-03376JBWB

Not eligible8780Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 69 85 70

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: SR 930 WBL Feature Crossed: ST. JOSEPH RIVER

This bridge is an example of a variation, evolution, or transition that is conveyed through features or innovations related to bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

(930)30-02-03857B Not eligible8810Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 44 85 53

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 930 Feature Crossed: SR 930 & WASHINGTON ST

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(930)30-02-06334A Not eligible8760Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 70 85 74

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: SR 930 Feature Crossed: COLISEUM DRIVE

244

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(I69)027-02-04553B Not eligible40383Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 83 85 82

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: COLDWATER ROAD SB Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(I69)327-02-04553DRB

Not eligible40387Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 83 85 82

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: COLDWATER ROAD NB Feature Crossed: I-69 RAMP

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(I69)327-02-04553JB Not eligible40385Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 83 85 82

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: COLDWATER ROAD NB Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

001-02-01854 Not eligible460Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 137 85 6

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 1 Feature Crossed: CONRAD DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

001-02-01855 Not eligible470Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 154 84 572

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 1 Feature Crossed: WATSON DITCH

245

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

003-02-01326ANBL Not eligible1320Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 147 85 101

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 3 NBL Feature Crossed: WILLOW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

003-02-01326ASBL Not eligible1330Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 147 85 101

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 3 SBL Feature Crossed: WILLOW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

003-02-04023ANBL Not eligible1300Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 143 85 101

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 3 NBL Feature Crossed: WILLOW CREEK DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

003-02-04023ASBL Not eligible1310Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 143 85 101

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 3 SBL Feature Crossed: WILLOW CREEK DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

014-02-04545B Not eligible3860Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 45 85 137

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: SR 14 Feature Crossed: I-69

246

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

024-02-03082AEBL Not eligible6160Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 9 85 194

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: US 24 EBL Feature Crossed: ABOITE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

024-02-03082AWBL Not eligible6170Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 9 85 194

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: US 24 WBL Feature Crossed: ABOITE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

024-02-03564 Not eligible6250Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 66 84 569

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: US 24 Feature Crossed: GAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

027-02-01662ASBL Not eligible7500Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 57 85 85

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: US 27 SBL Feature Crossed: SPY RUN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

027-02-03979CNBL Not eligible7450Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 558 85 18

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: US 27 NBL Feature Crossed: BERNING CREEK

247

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

027-02-06466ANBL Not eligible7490Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 51 85 82

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: US 27 NBL Feature Crossed: ST. MARY'S RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

030-02-04409CEBL Not eligible8700Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 76 85 149

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: US 30 EBL Feature Crossed: SEEGAR DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

030-02-04409CWBL Not eligible8710Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 76 85 149

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: US 30 WBL Feature Crossed: SEEGAR DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

030-02-04803A Not eligible8730Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 76 85 116

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: HILLEGAS ROAD Feature Crossed: US 30 & US 33

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

033-02-03794A Not eligible10910Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 113 85 176

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: US 33 Feature Crossed: EEL RIVER

248

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

033-02-03795B Not eligible10900Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 106 85 162

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: US 33 Feature Crossed: JOHNSON DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

033-02-04802C Not eligible10895Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 76 85 118

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: US 33 Feature Crossed: US 30

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

037-02-03925 Not eligible12570Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 100 84 580

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: SR 37 Feature Crossed: ROTH DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

037-02-03926 Not eligible12590Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 138 84 524

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: SR 37 Feature Crossed: WANN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

037-02-03927A Not eligible12600Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 144 84 513

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 37 Feature Crossed: HAMM DITCH

249

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

037-02-03928 Not eligible12610Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 148 84 507

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 37 Feature Crossed: PORTER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

037-02-03929 Not eligible12620Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 162 84 486

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: SR 37 Feature Crossed: DIETZEN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

101-02-04009 Not eligible25160Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 581 84 518

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 101 Feature Crossed: BROWN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-101-04789A Not eligible40150Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 10 85 153

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: YOHNE ROAD Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-103-04541A Not eligible40200Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 28 85 152

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: ABOITE CENTER ROAD Feature Crossed: I-69

250

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-104-04542A Not eligible40210Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 36 85 144

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: COVINGTON ROAD Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-106-04546A Not eligible40280Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 54 85 133

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: BASS ROAD Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-109-04548B Not eligible40300Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 70 85 116

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: HILLEGAS ROAD Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-113-04502A Not eligible40390Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 89 85 71

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: AUBURN ROAD Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-117-04505B Not eligible40440Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 121 85 63

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: UNION CHAPEL ROAD Feature Crossed: I-69

251

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-118-04506A Not eligible40450Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 134 85 63

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: HURSH ROAD Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-95-04786A Not eligible40100Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 559 85 189

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: YODER ROAD Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00023 Not eligible0200017Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 12.6 084 56.5

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: GRABILL ROAD Feature Crossed: OBERHALTZER DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00024 Not eligible0200325Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 12.6 084 56.5

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: CUBA ROAD Feature Crossed: OBERHALTZER DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00029 Not eligible0200019Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 13.4 085 00.5

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: GRABILL ROAD Feature Crossed: ST. JOSEPH RIVER

252

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00035 Not eligible0200024Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 11.5 085 04.6

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: TONKEL ROAD Feature Crossed: ELY RUN (#)

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00052 Not eligible0200038Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 14.1 085 10.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: LIMA ROAD Feature Crossed: WILLOW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00053 Not eligible0200039Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 14.9 085 10.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: LIMA ROAD Feature Crossed: WILLOW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00057 Not eligible0200040Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 11.3 085 17.5

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CARROLL ROAD Feature Crossed: MARTIN JOHNSON DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00068 Not eligible0200050Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 12.0 085 14.4

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: JOHNSON ROAD Feature Crossed: EEL RIVER (#)

253

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00081 Not eligible0200061Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 07.1 085 14.7

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: LEESBURG ROAD Feature Crossed: SEEGAR DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00083 Not eligible0200062Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 06.2 085 17.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: ARCOLA ROAD Feature Crossed: SEEGAR DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00086 Not eligible0200065Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 08.0 085 14.4

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: WASHINGTON CENTER Feature Crossed: SEEGAR DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00092 Not eligible0200069Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 05.3 085 13.1

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: BASS ROAD Feature Crossed: FLAUGH DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00096 Not eligible0200314Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 03.0 085 13.9

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: WEST JEFFERSON Feature Crossed: DURNELL DITCH

254

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00101 Not eligible0200073Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 09.1 085 06.6

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: LEO ROAD Feature Crossed: BECKETTS RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00108 Not eligible0200078Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 08.0 085 06.3

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: ST. JOE CENTER RD. Feature Crossed: ST. JOSEPH RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00109 Not eligible0200341Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date:Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 07.6 085 00.8

Concrete tee beam104

//Feature Carried: MAYSVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: KOESTER DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00120 Not eligible0200089Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 08.8 084 56.2

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: THIMLER ROAD Feature Crossed: BOTTERN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00126 Not eligible0200094Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 00.5 085 11.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: BAER ROAD Feature Crossed: FAIRFIELD DITCH (#)

255

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00127 Not eligible0200095Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 09.6 084 54.9

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: EHLE ROAD Feature Crossed: WILBUR DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00138 Not eligible0200104Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 05.8 084 50.3

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: GAR CREEK ROAD Feature Crossed: EDGERTON-CARSON DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00155 Not eligible0200117Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 01.4 084 50.7

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: LORTIE ROAD Feature Crossed: FLATROCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00156 Not eligible0200118Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 01.8 084 50.7

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: LORTIE ROAD Feature Crossed: HOFFMAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00162 Not eligible0200317Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 00.9 084 51.1

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: LINCOLN HIGHWAY E. Feature Crossed: FLATROCK CREEK OVERFLO

256

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00164 Not eligible0200122Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 00.4 084 57.1

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: MAPLES ROAD Feature Crossed: HOFFMAN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00168 Not eligible0200327Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 00.5 084 57.0

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: GERARDOT ROAD Feature Crossed: HOFFMAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00175 Not eligible0200130Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 04.6 084 55.4

Reinforced concrete slab - under fill

119A

//Feature Carried: WEBSTER ROAD Feature Crossed: LOMONT DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00182 Not eligible0200134Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 03.3 085 03.3

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: MOELLER ROAD Feature Crossed: TRIER DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00183 Not eligible0200135Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 02.9 085 01.8

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: SEILER ROAD Feature Crossed: SCHMIDT DITCH (#)

257

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00195 Not eligible0200334Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 05.3 085 00.5

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: NORTH RIVER ROAD Feature Crossed: BULLERMAN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00196 Not eligible0200145Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 03.8 085 01.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: WERLING ROAD Feature Crossed: COCHOIT DITCH (#)

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00204 Not eligible0200151Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 00.3 085 14.3

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: LOWER HUNTINGTON Feature Crossed: ROBINSON CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00249 Not eligible0200185Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 10.4 084 48.3

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: RIVER ROAD Feature Crossed: HAMM INTERCEPTOR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00264 Not eligible0200197Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 56.3 085 05.5

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: WINCHESTER ROAD Feature Crossed: SIMMERMAN DITCH

258

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00272 Not eligible0200203Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 57.3 084 59.9

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: MINNICH ROAD Feature Crossed: HOUK DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00276 Not eligible0200206Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 58.7 084 57.6

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: MONROEVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: BROWN DITCH (#)

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00284 Not eligible0200289Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 56.2 085 05.1

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: HOAGLAND ROAD Feature Crossed: ST. MARYS RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00285 Not eligible0200211Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 58.6 085 01.7

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: MONROEVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: HOUK DITCH (#)

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00298 Not eligible0200223Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 00.5 084 53.5

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: TERNET ROAD Feature Crossed: ELLISON DITCH

259

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00299 Not eligible0200224Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 01.0 084 53.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: TERNET ROAD Feature Crossed: HOFFMAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00301 Not eligible0200226Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 59.6 084 51.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: HOFFMAN ROAD Feature Crossed: FLATROCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00319 Not eligible0200241Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 06.4 085 02.5

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: STATE BOULEVARD Feature Crossed: BULLERMAN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00330 Not eligible0200319Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 04.3 085 09.8

Cont reinforced concrete arch

211

//Feature Carried: WEST JEFFERSON BLD Feature Crossed: ST. MARYS RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00339 Not eligible0200244Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 11.8 084 54.2

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: ANTWERP ROAD Feature Crossed: GORRELL DITCH (#)

260

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00423 Not eligible0200323Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 03.1 085 13.9

Reinforced concrete slab - under fill

119A

//Feature Carried: WEST JEFFERSON BVD Feature Crossed: GRAHAM MCCULLOCH DITC

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00502 Not eligible0200254Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 01.9 085 10.3

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: BELLE VISTA DRIVE Feature Crossed: FAIRFIELD DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00504 Not eligible0200256Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 04.1 085 09.7

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: TAYLOR STREET Feature Crossed: ST. MARYS RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00524 Not eligible0200260Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 05.3 085 10.2

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SPRING STREET Feature Crossed: CONRAIL RAILROAD

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00535 Not eligible0200266Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 05.2 085 07.3

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: COLUMBIA STREET Feature Crossed: DELTA LAKE

261

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge is an example of a variation, evolution, or transition that is conveyed through features or innovations related to bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C. This bridge represents a phase or feature of the work of a master and it is distinguishable when compared with similar structures. However, it does not retain the historic integrity necessary to convey engineering or design significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

00547 Not eligible0200274Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 05.8 085 08.2

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: STATE BOULEVARD Feature Crossed: ST. JOSEPH RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00549 Not eligible0200276Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 01.1 085 08.5

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: LOWER HUNTINGTON Feature Crossed: ST. MARYS RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00551 Not eligible0200309Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 04.3 085 06.0

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: EDSALL AVENUE Feature Crossed: NORFOLK-WESTERN RAILRO

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00603 Not eligible0200340Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 04.2 084 59.9

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: DAWKINS ROAD Feature Crossed: MARTIN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00604 Not eligible0200342Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 04.7 085 00.5

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: ROSE AVENUE Feature Crossed: MARTIN DITCH

262

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00605 Not eligible0200343Allen NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 04.2 085 01.6

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: OLD US 24 Feature Crossed: TRIER DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(11)31A-03-03613 Not eligible10310Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 84 85 546

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 11 Feature Crossed: DREDGED DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(11)31A-03-03625A Not eligible10300Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 75 85 541

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 11 Feature Crossed: CONNERS BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(11)31A-03-03626A Not eligible10320Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 93 85 553

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 11 Feature Crossed: DENIOS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(46)7-03-01811B Not eligible2080Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 118 85 541

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: HAW CREEK

263

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(46)9-03-01991A Not eligible2350Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 118 85 464

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: FISHERS FORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(46)9-03-01992A Not eligible2360Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 131 85 464

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: OTTER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(46)9-03-03826A Not eligible2340Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 104 85 495

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: FISHERS FORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(58)I65-64-04661B Not eligible21140Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 81 85 575

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: SR 58 Feature Crossed: I-65

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

009-03-01993B Not eligible2380Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 141 85 464

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 9 Feature Crossed: CLIFTY CREEK

264

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

009-03-03996B Not eligible2370Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 139 85 464

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 9 Feature Crossed: CLIFTY CREEK OVERFLOW

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

009-03-04519 Not eligible2390Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 186 85 463

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 9 Feature Crossed: LITTLE HAW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

009-03-04520A Not eligible2400Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 189 85 463

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 9 Feature Crossed: HAW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

031-03-03360C Not eligible9260Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/30/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 125 85 524

Steel thru truss310B

//Feature Carried: US 31 Feature Crossed: CLIFTY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-03-00942B Not eligible17370Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/31/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 152 85 428

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: FALL FORK CLIFTY CREEK

265

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-03-04175A Not eligible17310Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/31/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 121 86 40

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: STONEY LONESOME CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-03-04176 Not eligible17320Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 120 86 22

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: WOLF CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I65-58-04658 Not eligible35430Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 38 85 553

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 950 SOUTH Feature Crossed: I-65

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I65-62-04659 Not eligible35460Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 66 85 571

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 625 SOUTH Feature Crossed: I-65

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I65-65-04662 Not eligible35470Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 90 85 575

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 350 SOUTH Feature Crossed: I-65

266

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I65-66-04664A Not eligible35500Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 103 85 575

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 200 SOUTH Feature Crossed: I-65

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I65-67-04698 Not eligible35510Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 113 85 576

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CARR HILL RD (80S) Feature Crossed: I-65

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I65-69-04701 Not eligible35560Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 129 85 573

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 100 NORTH Feature Crossed: I-65

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I65-71-04702 Not eligible35570Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 147 85 573

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CR 300N/LOWELL RD. Feature Crossed: I-65

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I65-74-04801 Not eligible35580Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 165 85 573

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 500 NORTH Feature Crossed: I-65

267

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I65-75-04703 Not eligible35590Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 178 85 581

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: CR 650N/TANNEHILL Feature Crossed: I-65

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

[00147] Not eligibleXX014Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/31/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)

Steel pony truss310A

//Feature Carried: West of N 100W Feature Crossed: Breeding Farm, County Historic

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

[00198] Not eligibleXX015Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/30/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)

Steel thru truss310B

//Feature Carried: West of Lindsy Street Feature Crossed: Pond at Columbus Mill Race Pa

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00030 Not eligible0300028Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 11.2 085 43.8

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: TALKINGTON ROAD Feature Crossed: LITTLE SAND CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00035 Not eligible0300033Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 11.3 085 49.8

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 100 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BRUSH CREEK

268

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00039 Not eligible0300037Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/31/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 14.8 085 42.4

Steel thru truss310B

//Feature Carried: 300 NORTH Feature Crossed: FALL FORK CLIFTY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00044 Not eligible0300040Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 15.9 085 45.6

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 425 NORTH Feature Crossed: DUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00045 Not eligible0300041Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 15.9 085 45.4

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 425 NORTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH DUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00050 Not eligible0300046Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/13/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 19.7 085 41.6

Rein conc girder (trans girder) floor beam system

103

//Feature Carried: 850 NORTH Feature Crossed: DUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00057 Not eligible0300053Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 20.4 085 42.7

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: 945 NORTH Feature Crossed: LITTLE HAW CREEK

269

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00058 Not eligible0300054Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 19.5 085 43.2

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 1010 EAST Feature Crossed: LITTLE HAW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00078 Not eligible0300075Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 18.3 085 49.8

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: 700 NORTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF TOUGH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00081 Not eligible0300078Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 17.4 085 50.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 600 NORTH Feature Crossed: TOUGH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00090 Not eligible0300086Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 17.0 085 50.4

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: 550 NORTH Feature Crossed: TOUGH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00094 Not eligible0300091Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 14.3 085 49.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 250 NORTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH CLIFTY CREEK

270

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00100 Not eligible0300095Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/30/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 12.5 085 53.9

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: 10TH STREET (WEST) Feature Crossed: HAW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00103 Not eligible0300098Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/30/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 13.8 085 51.5

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: TALLEY ROAD Feature Crossed: SLOAN BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00110 Not eligible0300103Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 10.5 085 48.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 525 EAST Feature Crossed: FISHERS FORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00127 Not eligible0300118Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 04.3 085 50.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 900 SOUTH Feature Crossed: SAND BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00128 Not eligible0300119Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 04.7 085 50.2

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: 850 SOUTH Feature Crossed: SAND BRANCH

271

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00131 Not eligible0300122Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 02.4 085 54.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 1100 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH THOMPSON SLOUG

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00148 Not eligible0300132Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 17.8 085 56.6

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 650 NORTH Feature Crossed: BIG SLOUGH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00170 Not eligible0300142Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/31/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 14.4 085 58.3

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: WEST LOWELL ROAD Feature Crossed: DRIFTWOOD RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00181 Not eligible0300153Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 09.6 085 56.4

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: 150 WEST Feature Crossed: DENIOS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00193 Not eligible0300165Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/31/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 05.8 085 57.0

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 700 SOUTH Feature Crossed: EAST FORK WHITE CREEK

272

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00211 Not eligible0300180Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 04.0 086 02.7

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 725 WEST Feature Crossed: BRANCH WHITE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00249 Not eligible0300220Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 09.8 085 59.2

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: 400 WEST Feature Crossed: DENIOS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00283 Not eligible0300202Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 09.7 085 57.5

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 260 WEST Feature Crossed: DENIOS CREEK

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge is associated with an important historical event or trend at the state or local level; however, it does not retain historic integrity necessary to convey historical significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion A.

00291 Not eligible0300209Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/13/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 18.5 085 44.6

Stone arch811

//Feature Carried: 900 EAST Feature Crossed: LITTLE HAW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00316 Not eligible0300316Bartholomew NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 13.5 085 48.8

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 25TH STREET Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF CLIFTY CREEK

273

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

018-04-01516A Not eligible4580Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/7/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 364 87 99

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 18 Feature Crossed: BIG PINE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

052-04-03480DEBL Not eligible18950Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/7/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 306 87 116

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: US 52 EBL Feature Crossed: BIG PINE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

052-04-03480DWBL Not eligible18960Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/7/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 306 87 116

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: US 52 WBL Feature Crossed: BIG PINE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

055-04-01567 Not eligible19770Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 437 87 195

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 55 Feature Crossed: S FORK MONTGOMERY BRA

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

071-04-08376 Not eligible24677Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 336 87 295

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: SR 71 Feature Crossed: KULT DITCH

274

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

352-04-01650 Not eligible31910Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 312 87 208

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 352 Feature Crossed: MUD PINE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00006 Not eligible0400107Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/19/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 41.5 087 25.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: OLD US 52 & US 41 Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00008 Not eligible0400002Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 41.8 087 22.9

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: 300 W Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00015 Not eligible0400008Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 41.8 087 21.8

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: 200 W Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00023 Not eligible0400013Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/10/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 40.8 087 16.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 300 E Feature Crossed: BIG PINE CREEK DITCH

275

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00027 Not eligible0400016Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 40.1 087 13.8

Riveted plate girder - floor beam system

303F

//Feature Carried: 500 E Feature Crossed: BIG PINE CREEK DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00028 Not eligible0400017Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 39.8 087 12.6

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 600 E Feature Crossed: BIG PINE CREEK DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00032 Not eligible0400020Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 39.0 087 10.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 800 E Feature Crossed: BIG PINE CREEK DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00035 Not eligible0400022Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 39.0 087 10.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 300 N Feature Crossed: BIG PINE CREEK DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00036 Not eligible0400023Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 39.9 087 12.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 400 N Feature Crossed: BIG PINE CREEK DITCH

276

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00054 Not eligible0400032Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 35.6 087 23.3

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 100 S Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF MUD CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00061 Not eligible0400033Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 37.6 087 25.1

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 500 W Feature Crossed: MUD CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00062 Not eligible0400034Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 37.8 087 26.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 600 W Feature Crossed: MUD CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00063 Not eligible0400035Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 35.2 087 28.4

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 800 W Feature Crossed: FINIGAN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00080 Not eligible0400044Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 38.2 087 07.2

Riveted plate girder - floor beam system

303F

//Feature Carried: 1075 E Feature Crossed: BIG PINE CREEK

277

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00085 Not eligible0400049Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 33.8 087 09.4

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 300 S/875 E Feature Crossed: LITTLE PINE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00090 Not eligible0400053Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/7/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 36.0 087 12.6

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: 600 E Feature Crossed: GREENWOOD DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00095 Not eligible0400056Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 34.6 087 08.3

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: 200 S Feature Crossed: LITTLE PINE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00098 Not eligible0400058Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 35.1 087 08.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 1000 E Feature Crossed: LITTLE PINE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00101 Not eligible0400060Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 29.9 087 25.0

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: 500 W Feature Crossed: FARRELL DITCH

278

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00102 Not eligible0400108Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 31.0 087 27.2

Metal pipe-arch-under fill319D

//Feature Carried: 700 W Feature Crossed: LEUCK DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00109 Not eligible0400113Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 30.6 087 22.7

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: OLD U.S. HWY 41 Feature Crossed: GOOSE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00110 Not eligible0400063Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 29.9 087 29.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 750 S Feature Crossed: TRIBUTARY TO LEUCK DITC

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00117 Not eligible0400068Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 31.4 087 20.5

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 100 W Feature Crossed: MUD PINE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00123 Not eligible0400073Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/10/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 28.9 087 21.9

Steel pony truss310A

//Feature Carried: 850 S Feature Crossed: MUD PINE CREEK

279

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00125 Not eligible0400075Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 28.5 087 13.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 900 S Feature Crossed: BIG PINE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00131 Not eligible0400080Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 33.2 087 09.4

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 875 E Feature Crossed: BRUMM DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00132 Not eligible0400081Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 33.4 087 12.5

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 600 E Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF BIG PINE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00134 Not eligible0400083Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 28.7 087 12.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 600 E Feature Crossed: HARRINGTON DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00155 Not eligible0400092Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 35.6 087 29.6

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 100 S Feature Crossed: FINIGAN DITCH

280

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00157 Not eligible0400094Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 35.6 087 29.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 100 S Feature Crossed: FINIGAN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00170 Not eligible0400097Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 34.2 087 19.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: MERIDIAN RD Feature Crossed: WATTLES DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

01000 Not eligible0400098Benton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 29.7 087 09.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 900 E Feature Crossed: HARRINGTON DITCH

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

018-05-05867B Not eligible4890Blackford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 333 85 157

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 18 Feature Crossed: SALAMONIE RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

026-05-03257B Not eligible6960Blackford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 271 85 214

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: SR 26 Feature Crossed: LITTLE LICK CREEK

281

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00005 Not eligible0500005Blackford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 31.9 085 20.0

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 200 EAST Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00006 Not eligible0500006Blackford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 32.4 085 20.0

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 200 EAST Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00018 Not eligible0500016Blackford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 23.1 085 25.3

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 450 SOUTH Feature Crossed: LAKE MOHEE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00019 Not eligible0500017Blackford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 25.8 085 23.4

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: 100 WEST Feature Crossed: BIG LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00022 Not eligible0500020Blackford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 27.0 085 21.4

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: CROSS ST (CR075E) Feature Crossed: LITTLE LICK Creek

282

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00023 Not eligible0500021Blackford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 25.3 085 21.1

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: 100 EAST Feature Crossed: BIG LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00025 Not eligible0500023Blackford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 24.5 085 20.2

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 175 EAST Feature Crossed: BIG LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00028 Not eligible0500025Blackford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 24.4 085 19.7

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 300 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BIG LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00029 Not eligible0500026Blackford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 23.5 085 18.9

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: 300 EAST Feature Crossed: BIG LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00033 Not eligible0500030Blackford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 23.5 085 16.1

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: 400 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BIG LICK CREEK

283

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00040 Not eligible0500036Blackford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 23.4 085 17.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 400 EAST Feature Crossed: BIG LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00044 Not eligible0500040Blackford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 27.6 085 15.4

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 600 EAST Feature Crossed: TWO MILE DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00051 Not eligible0500047Blackford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 30.5 085 14.4

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 700 EAST Feature Crossed: SLOCUM DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00053 Not eligible0500049Blackford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 31.0 085 13.1

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 500 NORTH Feature Crossed: SLOCUM DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00502 Not eligible0500072Blackford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.6 085 22.0

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: JEFFERSON STREET Feature Crossed: LITTLE LICK CREEK

284

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00505 Not eligible0500074Blackford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.8 085 21.7

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: WILLMAN ROAD Feature Crossed: LITTLE LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(136)34-06-03291 Not eligible26890Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 566 86 402

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: US 136 Feature Crossed: EMILY GARDNER DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system under Criterion C. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge is located on an important transportation route or crossing; however, it does not retain historic integrity necessary to convey historical significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion A.

(421)29-06-00733A Not eligible32140Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 16 86 167

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 421 Feature Crossed: FINLEY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

032-06-00339 Not eligible10580Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 24 86 267

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 32 Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

032-06-00583B Not eligible10540Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 33 86 342

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: SR 32 Feature Crossed: WOLF CREEK

285

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

032-06-00584A Not eligible10550Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 28 86 300

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 32 Feature Crossed: DIERKS DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

032-06-00594 Not eligible10590Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 25 86 202

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 32 Feature Crossed: NEESE DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

032-06-00595A Not eligible10600Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 25 86 197

Composite steel beam302G

//Feature Carried: SR 32 Feature Crossed: MOUNTS RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

032-06-01660A Not eligible10620Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 25 86 158

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 32 Feature Crossed: FINLEY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

032-06-04116A Not eligible10560Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 28 86 294

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: SR 32 Feature Crossed: I-65

286

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

038-06-08392 Not eligible12705Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 100 86 167

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: SR 38 Feature Crossed: WILEY DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

039-06-01791C Not eligible13320Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 97 86 292

Steel thru truss310B

//Feature Carried: SR 39 Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

039-06-01852 Not eligible13270Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 570 86 313

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 39 Feature Crossed: GRASSY BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

039-06-01853 Not eligible13280Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 592 86 291

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: SR 39 Feature Crossed: MAIN EDLIN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

039-06-03952 Not eligible13310Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 70 86 289

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 39 Feature Crossed: SPRING CREEK

287

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

039-06-04115B Not eligible13290Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 21 86 283

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 39 Feature Crossed: I-65

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

047-06-05925B Not eligible17710Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 76 86 260

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: SR 47 Feature Crossed: BROWNS WONDER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

052-06-03137CEBL Not eligible19100Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 104 86 368

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: US 52 EBL Feature Crossed: GOLDSBERRY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system under Criterion C. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge is located on an important transportation route or crossing; however, it does not retain historic integrity necessary to convey historical significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion A.

052-06-03137JDWB Not eligible19105Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 104 86 368

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: US 52 WBL Feature Crossed: GOLDSBERRY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system under Criterion C. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge is located on an important transportation route or crossing; however, it does not retain historic integrity necessary to convey historical significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion A.

052-06-03139AEBL Not eligible19120Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 89 86 352

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 52 EBL Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK

288

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

075-06-01900A Not eligible24910Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 64 86 372

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 75 Feature Crossed: WOLF CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

075-06-04958A Not eligible24860Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 566 86 372

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: SR 75 Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

267-06-04294B Not eligible31240Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 589 86 238

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: SR 267 Feature Crossed: I-65

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

334-06-01901 Not eligible31550Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 570 86 176

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 334 Feature Crossed: IRISHMAN RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

334-06-03962A Not eligible31570Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 570 86 154

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: SR 334 Feature Crossed: EAGLE CREEK

289

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

334-06-04293B Not eligible31530Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 569 86 213

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: SR 334 Feature Crossed: I-65

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

334-06-04622B Not eligible31540Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 570 86 192

Cont prestressed concrete box beam-spread

606

//Feature Carried: SR 334 Feature Crossed: FISHBACK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I65-137-04114B Not eligible37180Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 17 86 271

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: CR 100E/HALL-BAKER Feature Crossed: I-65

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-45-04955 Not eligible44250Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 588 86 406

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 1100 WEST Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-47-04957A Not eligible44280Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 580 86 392

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 500 SOUTH Feature Crossed: I-74

290

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-51-04959A Not eligible44290Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 562 86 363

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 700 SOUTH Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-52-04961A Not eligible44320Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 554 86 351

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CR 800S/CO LINE RD Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00001 Not eligible0600001Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 03.2 086 29.7

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: LAFAYETTE AVENUE Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00013 Not eligible0600007Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 10.4 086 34.5

Steel pony truss310A

//Feature Carried: 550 WEST Feature Crossed: BRUSH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00027 Not eligible0600017Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 10.0 086 31.4

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: BLUBAUGH AVENUE Feature Crossed: REAGON RUN

291

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00029 Not eligible0600019Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 08.4 086 34.4

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 550 WEST Feature Crossed: SPRING CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00030 Not eligible0600020Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 07.9 086 33.7

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 650 NORTH Feature Crossed: SPRING CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00061 Not eligible0600044Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 02.5 086 17.3

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 1000 EAST Feature Crossed: BIG EAGLE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00062 Not eligible0600045Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 06.7 086 16.2

Reinforced concrete rigid frame

107A

//Feature Carried: 500 NORTH Feature Crossed: BIG EAGLE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00066 Not eligible0600049Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 03.9 086 16.5

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 200 NORTH Feature Crossed: BIG EAGLE CREEK

292

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00067 Not eligible0600183Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 03.1 086 15.2

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: 100 NORTH Feature Crossed: FINLEY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00072 Not eligible0600054Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 03.1 086 23.1

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: 100 NORTH Feature Crossed: BROWN'S WONDER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00084 Not eligible0600057Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 03.7 086 23.9

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: 400 EAST Feature Crossed: BROWN'S WONDER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00087 Not eligible0600060Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 04.0 086 24.5

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: 200 NORTH Feature Crossed: BROWN'S WONDER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00088 Not eligible0600061Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 04.2 086 25.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 300 EAST Feature Crossed: BROWN'S WONDER CREEK

293

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00091 Not eligible0600063Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 05.2 086 25.7

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: ELIZAVILLE AVENUE Feature Crossed: BROWN'S WONDER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00092 Not eligible0600064Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 01.8 086 30.2

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: MOUNT ZION ROAD Feature Crossed: SANITARY DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00097 Not eligible0600068Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 04.9 086 33.6

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: HAZELRIGG ROAD Feature Crossed: DEER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00108 Not eligible0600077Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 02.7 086 33.9

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 500 WEST Feature Crossed: WOLF CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00116 Not eligible0600085Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 05.3 086 37.4

Reinforced concrete rigid frame

107A

//Feature Carried: 350 NORTH Feature Crossed: WILEY CREEK

294

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00127 Not eligible0600127Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 01.8 086 39.9

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: 950 WEST Feature Crossed: WALNUT FORK/SUGAR CREE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00131 Not eligible0600185Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 04.0 086 40.8

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: 1175 WEST Feature Crossed: LITTLE SUGAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00132 Not eligible0600186Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 00.0 086 40.8

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: 200 NORTH Feature Crossed: LITTLE SUGAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00133 Not eligible0600187Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 03.7 086 38.3

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: 900 WEST Feature Crossed: LITTLE SUGAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00139 Not eligible0600094Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 02.2 086 38.0

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 875 WEST Feature Crossed: WALNUT FORK/ SUGAR CRE

295

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00142 Not eligible0600190Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 57.9 086 36.9

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: 500 SOUTH Feature Crossed: WELLS DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00143 Not eligible0600097Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 57.9 086 40.9

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 500 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BIG RACCOON CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00148 Not eligible0600101Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 00.1 086 35.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 600 WEST Feature Crossed: BIG RACCOON CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00150 Not eligible0600103Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 59.0 086 36.1

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 700 WEST Feature Crossed: BIG RACCOON CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00154 Not eligible0600104Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 57.1 086 33.9

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 500 WEST Feature Crossed: N. FORK BIG WALNUT CREE

296

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00158 Not eligible0600106Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 58.5 086 28.6

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: 25 WEST Feature Crossed: SMITH DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00159 Not eligible0600107Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 58.7 086 27.6

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: 400 SOUTH Feature Crossed: SMITH DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00160 Not eligible0600108Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 56.1 086 26.4

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: 700 SOUTH Feature Crossed: WILEY THOMPSON DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00161 Not eligible0600109Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 57.0 086 30.9

Reinforced concrete rigid frame

107A

//Feature Carried: 600 SOUTH Feature Crossed: GRASSY BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00162 Not eligible0600110Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 57.9 086 27.4

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 500 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BETT DITCH

297

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00164 Not eligible0600111Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 57.5 086 33.5

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: 550 SOUTH Feature Crossed: N. FORK BIG WALNUT CREE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00166 Not eligible0600113Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 59.1 086 31.3

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: JIM TOWN ROAD Feature Crossed: CUNNINGHAM DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00174 Not eligible0600116Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 59.2 086 26.9

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: 125 EAST Feature Crossed: SMITH DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00175 Not eligible0600117Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 59.1 086 27.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 350 SOUTH Feature Crossed: SMITH DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00182 Not eligible0600122Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 57.6 086 21.0

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 650 EAST Feature Crossed: FISHBACK CREEK

298

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00185 Not eligible0600124Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 59.4 086 23.3

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 450 EAST Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF FISHBACK CREE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00192 Not eligible0600129Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 59.6 086 19.0

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: 300 SOUTH Feature Crossed: JACKSON RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00193 Not eligible0600130Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 59.6 086 20.7

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: 300 SOUTH Feature Crossed: JACKSON RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00203 Not eligible0600136Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 57.4 086 16.1

Continuous prestressed concrete I-beam

602

//Feature Carried: 1100 EAST Feature Crossed: BIG EAGLE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00210 Not eligible0600142Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 57.5 086 19.7

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 550 SOUTH Feature Crossed: FISHBACK CREEK

299

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00212 Not eligible0600143Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 56.3 086 19.6

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SALEM ROAD Feature Crossed: FISHBACK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00222 Not eligible0600150Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 55.7 086 24.0

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 750 SOUTH Feature Crossed: WHITE LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00227 Not eligible0600152Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 55.2 086 36.5

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 800 SOUTH Feature Crossed: W. FORK BIG WALNUT CREE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00228 Not eligible0600153Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 56.0 086 35.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 600 WEST Feature Crossed: EDLIN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00231 Not eligible0600193Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 03.8 086 39.9

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: 1050 WEST Feature Crossed: LITTLE SUGAR CREEK

300

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00232 Not eligible0600156Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 09.7 086 37.6

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: RAY RD.(ABANDONED) Feature Crossed: GOLDSBERRY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00268 Not eligible0600161Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/20/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 55.7 086 29.3

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: 750 SOUTH Feature Crossed: ROSS DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00273 Not eligible0600162Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 56.3 086 33.9

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 500 WEST Feature Crossed: EDLIN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00278 Not eligible0600163Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 01.2 086 26.6

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: PERRY-WORTH Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00283 Not eligible0600164Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 01.1 086 26.8

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: INDIANAPOLIS AVE. Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

301

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00284 Not eligible0600165Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 00.8 086 26.5

Reinforced concrete slab - under fill

119A

//Feature Carried: INDIANAPOLIS AVE. Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00285 Not eligible0600166Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 00.5 086 40.6

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 200 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF WALNUT FORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00287 Not eligible0600167Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 01.0 086 26.3

Reinforced concrete slab - under fill

119A

//Feature Carried: PERRY-WORTH Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00303 Not eligible0600171Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 03.0 086 28.6

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: N. JAMESON STREET Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00310 Not eligible0600178Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 03.1 086 28.0

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: PARK STREET Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

302

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00314 Not eligible0600182Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 02.8 086 27.4

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: MAIN STREET Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00400 Not eligible0600194Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 08.8 086 27.9

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: 750 NORTH Feature Crossed: BROWN'S WONDER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00401 Not eligible0600195Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 59.2 086 17.5

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: 300 SOUTH Feature Crossed: JACKSON RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00594 Not eligible0600200Boone NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 01.7 086 20.6

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 700E Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF MOUNTS RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(135)35-07-01350A Not eligible26650Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 165 86 151

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 135 Feature Crossed: HOPPERS BRANCH

303

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(135)35-07-01518 Not eligible26660Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 173 86 155

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 135 Feature Crossed: MOSER BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(135)35-07-01519 Not eligible26670Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 174 86 155

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 135 Feature Crossed: LITTLE BEANBLOSSOM CRE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

045-07-05333B Not eligible16890Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 160 86 180

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: SR 45 Feature Crossed: LICK CREEK

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

046-07-00493A Not eligible17250Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 121 86 149

Reinforced concrete arch - open spandrel

111B

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: NORTH FORK SALT CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-07-01535 Not eligible17210Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 92 86 220

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: BARTLETTS BRANCH

304

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-07-01549 Not eligible17230Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 112 86 155

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: TATER BUG BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-07-04170 Not eligible17260Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 122 86 145

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: GREASY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-07-04171A Not eligible17270Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 121 86 138

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: NORTH FORK SALT CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-07-04172A Not eligible17280Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 120 86 135

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: NORTH FORK SALT CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-07-04173A Not eligible17290Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 115 86 118

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: NORTH FORK SALT CREEK

305

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-07-04174A Not eligible17300Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 120 86 78

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: GNAW BONE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

135-07-04053A Not eligible26630Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 115 86 116

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 135 Feature Crossed: GNAW BONE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00001 Not eligible0700001Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 16.1 086 17.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: LICK CREEK ROAD Feature Crossed: LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00006 Not eligible0700005Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 19.2 086 18.4

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: RICHARDS ROAD Feature Crossed: LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00008 Not eligible0700007Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 17.7 086 20.7

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: BEAR CREEK ROAD Feature Crossed: BEAR CREEK

306

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00011 Not eligible0700009Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 15.9 086 13.8

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: GATESVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: BR BEAN BLOSSOM CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00014 Not eligible0700011Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 15.7 086 17.6

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: HELMSBURG ROAD Feature Crossed: BEAN BLOSSOM CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00015 Not eligible0700012Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 16.3 086 12.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: BEAN BLOSSOM ROAD Feature Crossed: BEAN BLOSSOM CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00016 Not eligible0700013Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 15.7 086 08.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: GATESVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: NORTH FORK SALT CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00017 Not eligible0700014Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 15.7 086 12.2

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: BEAR WALLOW HILL Feature Crossed: E FK BEAN BLOSSOM CREEK

307

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00025 Not eligible0700018Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 09.4 086 06.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: BELLSVILLE PIKE Feature Crossed: S BR MIDDLE FK SALT CR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00029 Not eligible0700021Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 07.6 086 08.2

Simple steel girder - floor beam system

303B

//Feature Carried: POPLAR GROVE ROAD Feature Crossed: MIDDLE FORK SALT CREEK

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

00031 Not eligible0700023Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 10.5 086 20.4

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: JACKSON CREEK ROAD Feature Crossed: JACKSON CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00037 Not eligible0700029Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 08.9 086 21.1

Steel pony truss310A

//Feature Carried: TC STEELE ROAD Feature Crossed: NORTH FORK SALT CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00047 Not eligible0700034Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 02.9 086 17.3

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: MAUMEE ROAD Feature Crossed: SYCAMORE BRANCH

308

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00065 Not eligible0700038Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 12.2 086 13.2

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: OLD SR 46 Feature Crossed: CLAY LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00066 Not eligible0700039Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 12.3 086 14.9

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: OLD SR 46 Feature Crossed: GREASY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00080 Not eligible0700041Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 12.8 086 16.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: OWL CREEK ROAD Feature Crossed: OWL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00081 Not eligible0700042Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 15.8 086 20.7

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: NORTH SHORE DRIVE Feature Crossed: BR BEAN BLOSSOM CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00091 Not eligible0700044Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 11.6 086 08.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: MT LIBERTY ROAD Feature Crossed: GNAWBONE CREEK

309

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00093 Not eligible0700046Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 14.6 086 05.6

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: HOOVER ROAD Feature Crossed: EAST FORK SALT CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00094 Not eligible0700047Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 15.7 086 07.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: HOOVER ROAD Feature Crossed: BR OF EAST FK SALT CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00096 Not eligible0700049Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 16.9 086 10.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: SPRUNICA ROAD Feature Crossed: NORTH FORK SALT CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00097 Not eligible0700050Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 16.1 086 09.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: PETRO ROAD Feature Crossed: NORTH FORK SALT CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00099 Not eligible0700052Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 09.3 086 18.3

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: CROOKED CREEK ROAD Feature Crossed: LOWER SCHOONER CREEK

310

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00104 Not eligible0700057Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 05.3 086 11.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: MT NEBO ROAD Feature Crossed: HAMILTON CREEK

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

00108 Not eligible0700060Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 13.3 086 12.2

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: WALLOW HOLLOW ROAD Feature Crossed: CLAY LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00109 Not eligible0700061Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 20.4 086 21.3

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: BEAR CREEK ROAD Feature Crossed: INDIAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00111 Not eligible0700063Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 12.5 086 16.4

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: COUNTRY CLUB ROAD Feature Crossed: OWL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00112 Not eligible0700064Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 17.2 086 07.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: MT MORIAH ROAD Feature Crossed: EAST BR SWEETWATER CRE

311

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00114 Not eligible0700065Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 16.7 086 16.5

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: TURNER ROAD Feature Crossed: N FK BEAN BLOSSOM CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00118 Not eligible0700067Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 11.8 086 17.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: GREEN VALLEY ROAD Feature Crossed: LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00119 Not eligible0700068Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 11.9 086 17.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: OAK GROVE ROAD Feature Crossed: SCISCOE BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00122 Not eligible0700071Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 10.9 086 07.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: MT LIBERTY ROAD Feature Crossed: MT LIBERTY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00124 Not eligible0700072Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 08.7 086 06.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: BELLSVILLE PIKE Feature Crossed: BRANCH MIDDLE FK SALT C

312

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00125 Not eligible0700073Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 06.2 086 19.3

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: CROOKED CREEK ROAD Feature Crossed: CROOKED CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00129 Not eligible0700077Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 19.0 086 10.1

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: GOLDPOINT ROAD Feature Crossed: NORTH FORK SALT CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00130 Not eligible0700078Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 18.3 086 12.1

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: BELL ROAD Feature Crossed: BEAN BLOSSOM CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00132 Not eligible0700080Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 17.3 086 07.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: MT MORIAH ROAD Feature Crossed: FORK EAST BR SWEETWATE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00133 Not eligible0700081Brown NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 18.7 086 09.9

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: UPPER SALT CR ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH NORTH FK SALT CR

313

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system under Criterion C. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge is located on an important transportation route or crossing; however, it does not retain historic integrity necessary to convey historical significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion A.

(18)29-08-00978A Not eligible7930Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 334 86 236

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 18 Feature Crossed: LITTLE DEER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

025-08-01145B Not eligible6420Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 345 86 410

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 25 Feature Crossed: DEER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

025-08-01148A Not eligible6460Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 392 86 333

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 25 Feature Crossed: ROCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

025-08-02218A Not eligible6450Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 360 86 394

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: SR 25 Feature Crossed: NSRR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

025-08-04113A Not eligible6430Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 355 86 396

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 25 Feature Crossed: ROBINSON BRANCH

314

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

029-08-03511B Not eligible7920Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 293 86 237

Continuous prestressed concrete I-beam

602

//Feature Carried: SR 29 Feature Crossed: WILDCAT CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

075-08-05095A Not eligible25000Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 362 86 322

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 75 Feature Crossed: DEER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00003 Not eligible0800002Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 30.7 086 38.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 250 SOUTH Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00007 Not eligible0800005Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 30.7 086 40.2

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 250 SOUTH Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00009 Not eligible0800007Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 30.2 086 38.7

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 300 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF SUGAR CR

315

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00010 Not eligible0800008Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 30.6 086 40.6

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 800 WEST Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00012 Not eligible0800010Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 27.6 086 40.7

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: 800 WEST Feature Crossed: WILDCAT CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00017 Not eligible0800013Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 27.6 086 26.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 600 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF WILDCAT CR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00021 Not eligible0800017Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.3 086 31.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 750 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BR MIDDLE FK WILDCAT CR

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

00025 Not eligible0800021Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date:Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 28.4 086 35.3

Steel thru truss310B

//Feature Carried: PRINCE WILLIAM RD Feature Crossed: WILDCAT CREEK

316

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00027 Not eligible0800022Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 26.6 086 30.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 100 EAST Feature Crossed: MIDDLE FORK WILDCAT CR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00036 Not eligible0800028Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 31.4 086 28.0

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: 300 EAST Feature Crossed: BACHELOR RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00044 Not eligible0800033Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 33.3 086 31.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 25 EAST Feature Crossed: BACHELOR RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00048 Not eligible0800036Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 31.5 086 28.6

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 150 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BACHELOR RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00069 Not eligible0800049Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 37.7 086 41.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 900 WEST Feature Crossed: PLEASANT RUN

317

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00075 Not eligible0800055Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 39.8 086 24.1

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: 800 NORTH Feature Crossed: LITTLE ROCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00093 Not eligible0800070Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 41.1 086 33.4

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: 175 WEST Feature Crossed: LITTLE ROCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00113 Not eligible0800086Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 42.4 086 41.5

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 1100 NORTH Feature Crossed: RATTLESNAKE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00114 Not eligible0800087Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 40.4 086 37.6

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: TOWPATH ROAD Feature Crossed: RATTLESNAKE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00115 Not eligible0800088Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 41.7 086 34.9

Composite steel beam302G

//Feature Carried: TOWPATH ROAD Feature Crossed: POSSUM HOLLOW CREEK

318

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00125 Not eligible0800100Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 36.0 086 39.6

Concrete tee beam104

//Feature Carried: OLD SR 25 Feature Crossed: ROBINSON BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00126 Not eligible0800096Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 33.7 086 40.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 100 NORTH Feature Crossed: BRIDGE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00129 Not eligible0800126Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 36.8 086 38.2

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 600 WEST Feature Crossed: ROBINSON BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00134 Not eligible0800102Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 38.9 086 32.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 50 WEST Feature Crossed: ROCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00147 Not eligible0800125Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 42.4 086 45.4

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 1100 NORTH Feature Crossed: LAKE FREEMAN CANAL

319

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00180 Not eligible0800118Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 37.0 086 28.0

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: 300 EAST Feature Crossed: PAINT CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00501 Not eligible0800128Carroll NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 39.7 086 45.9

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: 1250 WEST Feature Crossed: UNKNOWN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(24)29-09-02279B Not eligible11267Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 444 86 234

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: US 24 & US 35 Feature Crossed: SR 25 & N&S RR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(24)29-09-02280B Not eligible11269Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 445 86 235

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: US 24 & US 35 Feature Crossed: CONRAIL

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(24)29-09-02281B Not eligible11273Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 454 86 239

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: US 24 & US 35 Feature Crossed: CONRAIL

320

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(24)29-09-04620B Not eligible11271Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 449 86 237

Composite continuous riveted plate girder

402I

//Feature Carried: US 24 & US 35 Feature Crossed: WABASH RIVER & 2 STS

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(24)29-09-04709B Not eligible11275Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 454 86 240

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: US24WBL & US35 Feature Crossed: US24WBL & BATES STREET

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

016-09-03015 Not eligible4320Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 520 86 176

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 16 Feature Crossed: W BRANCH TWELVE MILE C

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

016-09-06135B Not eligible4310Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 521 86 313

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: SR 16 Feature Crossed: FREDRICKS DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

016-09-06136B Not eligible4330Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 520 86 155

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: SR 16 Feature Crossed: SMALL BR TWELVE MILE CR

321

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

018-09-01971 Not eligible4690Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 342 86 213

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 18 Feature Crossed: GRASS RUN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system under Criterion C. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge is located on an important transportation route or crossing; however, it does not retain historic integrity necessary to convey historical significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion A.

024-09-00727B Not eligible5960Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/28/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 459 86 299

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 24 Feature Crossed: CROOKED CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

024-09-01574 Not eligible5990Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 455 86 260

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: US 24 Feature Crossed: COTTONWOOD CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

024-09-05768A Not eligible5980Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 459 86 286

Reinforced concrete box - under fill

119C

//Feature Carried: US 24 Feature Crossed: PAW PAW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

025-09-00805A Not eligible6500Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 525 86 183

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 25 Feature Crossed: W BRANCH TWELVE MILE C

322

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

025-09-00806A Not eligible6510Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 537 86 172

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 25 Feature Crossed: KEREN NEFF DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

035-09-01947B Not eligible11260Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 362 86 122

Composite steel beam302G

//Feature Carried: US 35 Feature Crossed: DEER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

035-09-01948A Not eligible11250Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 349 86 114

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 35 Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK DEER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

218-09-03179B Not eligible28930Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 399 86 213

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 218 Feature Crossed: BIG ROCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00012 Not eligible0900145Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 45.5 086 12.8

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: LOGANSPORT ROAD Feature Crossed: WILLIAMS DITCH

323

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00013 Not eligible0900011Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 51.7 086 30.3

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: CENTER STREET Feature Crossed: FREDRICKS DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00019 Not eligible0900014Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 53.6 086 32.7

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 900 WEST Feature Crossed: HANCOCK DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00026 Not eligible0900019Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 49.4 086 23.4

Metal pipe-round pipe-under fill

319C

//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 400 NORTH Feature Crossed: CROOKED CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00052 Not eligible0900031Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 49.9 086 13.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 450 NORTH Feature Crossed: TWELVE MILE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00065 Not eligible0900042Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 51.5 086 10.6

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 1050 EAST Feature Crossed: E BRANCH TWELVE MILE CR.

324

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00120 Not eligible0900081Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 45.3 086 13.4

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 800 EAST Feature Crossed: WILLIAMS DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00138 Not eligible0900096Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 41.6 086 19.8

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 500 SOUTH Feature Crossed: LITTLE ROCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00142 Not eligible0900099Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 41.6 086 12.7

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 500 SOUTH Feature Crossed: LITTLE DEER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00160 Not eligible0900115Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 38.8 086 20.2

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 200 EAST Feature Crossed: ANSBERRY BIRD DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00161 Not eligible0900138Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 38.9 086 20.3

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 800 SOUTH Feature Crossed: ANSBERRY BIRD DITCH

325

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00164 Not eligible0900150Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 33.5 086 12.4

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: CR 900 EAST Feature Crossed: TRIB.-S. FORK DEE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00185 Not eligible0900129Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 40.7 086 16.1

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: CO. RD. 550 EAST Feature Crossed: BIG ROCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00506 Not eligible0900135Cass NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 44.7 086 22.6

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: BARTLETT STREET Feature Crossed: GOOSE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(131X)131-10-04279A

Not eligible26310Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 182 85 469

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 131X Feature Crossed: OLD SR 62

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(160)39-10-03234 Not eligible28170Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/3/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 325 85 459

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 160 Feature Crossed: MILLER FORK

326

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(31)I65-1-02185NCD Not eligible8890Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 167 85 450

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: US 31 NBL Feature Crossed: 2 RR & 9TH STREET

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(31)I65-1-02185SCD Not eligible8900Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 167 85 450

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: US 31 SBL Feature Crossed: 2 RR & 9TH STREET

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(31)I65-1-03868NCC Not eligible8910Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/20/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 168 85 450

Composite steel beam302G

//Feature Carried: US 31 NBL Feature Crossed: SR 62X (10TH STREET)

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(31)I65-1-03868SCD Not eligible8920Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/20/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 168 85 451

Composite steel beam302G

//Feature Carried: US 31 SBL Feature Crossed: SR 62X (10TH STREET)

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(31)I65-1-04813NCC Not eligible8870Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 166 85 450

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: US 31 NBL Feature Crossed: SEVENTH STREET

327

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(31)I65-1-04813SCC Not eligible8880Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 166 85 450

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: US 31 SBL Feature Crossed: SEVENTH STREET

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(62X)I65-2-03836A Not eligible34630Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 175 85 456

Reinforced concrete box - under fill

119C

//Feature Carried: SR 62X Feature Crossed: MILL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

003-10-03209A Not eligible700Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 271 85 402

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 3 Feature Crossed: PLEASANT RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system under Criterion C. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge is located on an important transportation route or crossing; however, it does not retain historic integrity necessary to convey historical significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion A.

031-10-01343A Not eligible9000Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/20/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 250 85 452

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 31 Feature Crossed: MUDDY FORK & CO RD

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

060-10-01928 Not eligible21500Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 283 85 575

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 60 Feature Crossed: SOUDERS BRANCH

328

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

060-10-03011 Not eligible21550Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 243 85 473

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 60 Feature Crossed: ELK RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

060-10-03071 Not eligible21490Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 288 85 584

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 60 Feature Crossed: PACKWOOD BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

060-10-03311 Not eligible21530Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 266 85 533

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 60 Feature Crossed: PERSIMMON RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

060-10-03312 Not eligible21540Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 265 85 525

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 60 Feature Crossed: MONEYS BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

062-10-01399 Not eligible22420Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 333 85 326

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 62 Feature Crossed: BOWERS CREEK

329

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

062-10-01400 Not eligible22430Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/3/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 349 85 325

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 62 Feature Crossed: EAST FORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

160-10-04223F Not eligible28160Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 325 85 467

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: SR 160 Feature Crossed: I-65

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I65-10-04137A Not eligible34760Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 246 85 459

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: ST. JOE ROAD Feature Crossed: I-65

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I65-14-04218B Not eligible34820Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 286 85 462

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: EBENEZER CHURCH RD Feature Crossed: I-65

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I65-16-04221A Not eligible34870Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 303 85 463

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: BIGGS ROAD Feature Crossed: I-65

330

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I65-20-04224A Not eligible34900Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 336 85 468

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: HEBRON CHURCH ROAD Feature Crossed: I-65

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I65-23-04227A Not eligible34930Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 363 85 469

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: COUNTY LINE ROAD Feature Crossed: I-65

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00010 Not eligible1000006Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 20.0 085 39.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: UTICA-SELLERSBG.RD Feature Crossed: LENTZIER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00025 Not eligible1000019Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 30.5 085 45.8

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: CANEY ROAD Feature Crossed: MILLER FORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00034 Not eligible1000025Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 28.7 085 39.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: NEW MARKET-CHAS RD Feature Crossed: NINE PENNY BRANCH

331

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00035 Not eligible1000026Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 27.3 085 43.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: STONY POINT ROAD Feature Crossed: SINKING FORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00044 Not eligible1000034Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 31.8 085 33.2

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: WESTPORT ROAD Feature Crossed: FLAG RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00059 Not eligible1000049Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 33.7 085 36.3

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: MICHIGAN ROAD Feature Crossed: ROGERS RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00060 Not eligible1000050Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 35.0 085 32.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: FRANK FISHER ROAD Feature Crossed: EAST FORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00065 Not eligible1000055Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 32.0 085 35.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: HENDERSON ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF 14 MILE CREEK

332

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00075 Not eligible1000062Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 31.8 085 47.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: BLUE LICK ROAD Feature Crossed: CANEY FORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00076 Not eligible1000063Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 31.3 085 47.7

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: BLUE LICK ROAD Feature Crossed: VOTE RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00078 Not eligible1000065Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 30.3 085 47.8

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: BLUE LICK ROAD Feature Crossed: BLUE LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00079 Not eligible1000066Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 29.9 085 47.3

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: BLUE LICK ROAD Feature Crossed: BOWERY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00082 Not eligible1000067Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 31.3 085 47.2

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: HOUSER ROAD Feature Crossed: VOTE RUN

333

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00087 Not eligible1000072Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 30.4 085 48.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: BARTLE KNOB ROAD Feature Crossed: RIGHT BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00095 Not eligible1000079Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 24.5 085 52.1

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: WIESEKA HILL ROAD Feature Crossed: LITTLE INDIAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00099 Not eligible1000082Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 24.0 085 56.6

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: SMITH ROAD Feature Crossed: CAMPBELL BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00104 Not eligible1000104Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 30.3 085 35.1

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: TUNNEL MILL ROAD Feature Crossed: POLK RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00105 Not eligible1000086Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 31.8 085 33.2

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: TUNNEL MILL ROAD Feature Crossed: FLAG RUN

334

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00120 Not eligible1000089Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 21.7 085 38.6

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: UTICA PIKE Feature Crossed: BATTLE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00127 Not eligible1000090Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 33.1 085 37.7

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: MICHIGAN ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF 14 MILE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00129 Not eligible1000105Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 23.6 085 45.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: NEW ALBANY STREET Feature Crossed: CAMP RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00145 Not eligible1000096Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 27.7 085 42.5

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: CHARTWN/MEMPHIS RD Feature Crossed: CARR-PEYTON BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00408 Not eligible1000108Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 28.3 085 57.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: WEST MAIN STREET Feature Crossed: SOUDERS BRANCH

335

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00409 Not eligible1000109Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 18.8 085 42.2

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: LANCASSANGE CREEK Feature Crossed: MILL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00413 Not eligible1000116Clark NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 17.9 085 46.5

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: OLD SR 62 Feature Crossed: CSX RR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

040-11-01832A Not eligible13650Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 326 87 27

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 40 Feature Crossed: CROYS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

042-11-01428 Not eligible15730Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 269 87 127

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 42 Feature Crossed: EAST FORK HONEY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

042-11-05942A Not eligible15740Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 269 87 127

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: COAL CO. ROAD Feature Crossed: SR 42

336

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-11-01315 Not eligible17040Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 232 87 22

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: KILLON DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-11-06715 Not eligible17030Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 232 87 28

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: HOG CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

059-11-00485A Not eligible21250Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/17/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 187 87 66

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 59 Feature Crossed: CONNELEY DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

059-11-00492A Not eligible21310Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 295 87 76

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 59 Feature Crossed: BIRCH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

059-11-01236A Not eligible21240Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 182 87 66

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 59 Feature Crossed: MARKLEY DITCH

337

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

059-11-01727A Not eligible21230Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 172 87 68

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 59 Feature Crossed: BRANCH CONNELEY DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

059-11-01728A Not eligible21260Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 204 87 66

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 59 Feature Crossed: EEL RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

059-11-01731 Not eligible21290Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 260 87 76

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 59 Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

059-11-02202B Not eligible21340Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 358 87 75

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: SR 59 Feature Crossed: CSX RR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

059-11-03484 Not eligible21330Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 330 87 75

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 59 Feature Crossed: OTTER CREEK

338

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

059-11-04873A Not eligible21280Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 243 87 67

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 59 Feature Crossed: BIRCH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

246-11-03661 Not eligible30350Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 169 87 65

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 246 Feature Crossed: BRANCH CONNELEY DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00001 Not eligible1100001Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 33.1 087 09.1

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CR 200 WEST Feature Crossed: OTTER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00002 Not eligible1100002Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 35.2 087 09.1

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: CR 200 WEST Feature Crossed: LITTLE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00012 Not eligible1100012Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 31.6 087 10.2

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CR 950 NORTH Feature Crossed: PENIEL RUN

339

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00018 Not eligible1100017Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 31.3 087 04.6

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: CR 200 EAST Feature Crossed: BILLY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00019 Not eligible1100018Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 35.0 087 06.0

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 1350 NORTH Feature Crossed: OTTER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00020 Not eligible1100019Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 31.0 087 04.3

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: CR 900 NORTH Feature Crossed: BILLY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00024 Not eligible1100023Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 33.1 087 01.3

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 500 EAST Feature Crossed: CANAAN RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00026 Not eligible1100025Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 34.1 087 03.6

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: CR 300 EAST Feature Crossed: VAN BUREN CREEK

340

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00029 Not eligible1100028Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 33.1 087 02.4

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CR 400 EAST Feature Crossed: CROYS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00038 Not eligible1100037Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 32.8 087 03.1

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 350 EAST Feature Crossed: CROYS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00044 Not eligible1100041Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 26.3 087 09.0

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 200 WEST Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00046 Not eligible1100043Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 25.9 087 11.3

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: CR 300 NORTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF CROOKED CREE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00049 Not eligible1100045Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 29.3 087 10.1

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: CR 300 WEST Feature Crossed: LITTLE BIRCH CREEK

341

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00050 Not eligible1100046Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 27.9 087 10.1

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 300 WEST Feature Crossed: LITTLE BIRCH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00057 Not eligible1100053Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 29.3 087 08.4

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: CR 700 NORTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF BIRCH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00061 Not eligible1100056Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 29.4 087 13.5

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: HAPPY HOLLER ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF LOST CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00077 Not eligible1100068Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 26.0 087 07.1

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: CR 25 WEST Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00081 Not eligible1100072Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 26.9 087 02.4

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 400 EAST Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF MCINTYRE CRE

342

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00082 Not eligible1100073Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 29.9 087 02.4

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 400 EAST Feature Crossed: WESLEY DRAIN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00084 Not eligible1100075Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 30.9 087 02.4

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CR 400 EAST Feature Crossed: CROYS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00089 Not eligible1100077Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 26.3 087 03.0

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 350 EAST Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF MCINTYRE CRE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00090 Not eligible1100078Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 26.1 087 03.7

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: CR 300 EAST Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF MCINTYRE CRE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00095 Not eligible1100082Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 28.5 087 05.8

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: CR 100 EAST Feature Crossed: BR EAST FORK BIRCH CREE

343

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00104 Not eligible1100087Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 22.5 087 13.9

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CR 100 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BIG SLOUGH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00116 Not eligible1100094Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 25.1 087 09.2

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CR 200 NORTH Feature Crossed: CROOKED CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00119 Not eligible1100097Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 24.9 087 12.3

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: LWR BLOOMINGTON RD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF HONEY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00128 Not eligible1100106Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 21.6 087 09.9

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CR 200 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF BIRCH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00133 Not eligible1100110Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 22.4 087 13.3

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: CR 600 WEST Feature Crossed: BR. OF BIG SLOUGH CREEK

344

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00157 Not eligible1100130Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 24.9 086 59.2

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 700 EAST Feature Crossed: KNOB CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00164 Not eligible1100137Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 23.2 086 58.2

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: CR 800 EAST Feature Crossed: MUDDY BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00165 Not eligible1100138Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 23.0 087 01.2

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: BOWLG GREEN/POLAND Feature Crossed: JORDAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00170 Not eligible1100142Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 19.9 087 13.3

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CR 600 WEST Feature Crossed: BR. LITTLE SLOUGH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00171 Not eligible1100143Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/20/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 18.6 087 13.3

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: CR 600 WEST Feature Crossed: SPLUNGE CREEK

345

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00172 Not eligible1100144Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 18.4 087 13.3

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: CR 600 WEST Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF SPLUNGE CREE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00173 Not eligible1100145Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/20/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 18.3 087 13.3

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 600 WEST Feature Crossed: BRANCH BIG SLOUGH CREE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00185 Not eligible1100156Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 19.9 087 11.7

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: CR 400 SOUTH Feature Crossed: CLEAR BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00190 Not eligible1100161Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 17.1 087 07.9

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CR 100 WEST Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF CONNELEY DITC

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00193 Not eligible1100164Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 16.8 087 10.3

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: CR 750 SOUTH Feature Crossed: LAFFERTY DITCH

346

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00199 Not eligible1100166Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 16.3 087 10.0

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: CR 300 WEST Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF LAFFERTY DITC

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00223 Not eligible1100185Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 15.3 087 06.3

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: CR 900 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH WHITE OAK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00230 Not eligible1100192Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/17/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 14.9 087 08.5

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 950 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF CONNELEY DITC

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00239 Not eligible1100196Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 11.9 087 10.9

Rein conc girder (trans girder) floor beam system

103

//Feature Carried: CR 1300 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BR. WABASH & ERIE CANAL

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00241 Not eligible1100198Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 13.2 087 09.9

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 1150 SOUTH Feature Crossed: WABASH & ERIE CANAL

347

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00244 Not eligible1100201Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 11.0 087 08.9

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 200 WEST Feature Crossed: GUIRL DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00245 Not eligible1100202Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/17/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 11.7 087 11.0

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 400 WEST Feature Crossed: BR. WABASH & ERIE CANAL

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00248 Not eligible1100205Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/17/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 11.8 087 09.1

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CANAL ROAD Feature Crossed: BRCH WABASH & ERIE CANA

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00249 Not eligible1100206Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 12.3 087 12.2

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 500 WEST Feature Crossed: BR. WABASH & ERIE CANAL

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00250 Not eligible1100207Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/17/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 10.6 087 11.5

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 1450 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BR. WABASH & ERIE CANAL

348

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00251 Not eligible1100208Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 10.9 087 11.0

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: CR 400 WEST Feature Crossed: BR. WABASH & ERIE CANAL

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00252 Not eligible1100209Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 11.2 087 11.0

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: CR 400 WEST Feature Crossed: BR. WABASH & ERIE CANAL

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00253 Not eligible1100210Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/17/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 11.4 087 11.1

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 1350 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BR. WABASH & ERIE CANAL

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00254 Not eligible1100211Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 11.6 087 13.0

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: CR 1350 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BR. WABASH & ERIE CANAL

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00267 Not eligible1100223Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 11.1 087 04.5

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 200 EAST Feature Crossed: POND CREEK

349

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00273 Not eligible1100228Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 10.8 087 06.5

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 1400 SOUTH Feature Crossed: WABASH & ERIE CANAL

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00274 Not eligible1100229Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/17/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 10.4 087 05.7

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 100 EAST Feature Crossed: WABASH & ERIE CANAL

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00329 Not eligible1100239Clay NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 18.6 087 10.0

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: CR 300 WEST Feature Crossed: LAFFERTY DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

026-12-01807 Not eligible6750Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/14/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 251 86 366

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 26 Feature Crossed: CAMPBELLS RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

026-12-01808 Previously determined not eligible

6760Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 250 86 293

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 26 Feature Crossed: ROBINSON BRANCH

350

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

039-12-03953A Not eligible13330Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 119 86 295

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: SR 39 Feature Crossed: REAGAN RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

052-12-03135B Not eligible19080Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 132 86 398

Composite steel beam302G

//Feature Carried: US 52 Feature Crossed: LITTLE POTATO CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

075-12-04054A Not eligible24950Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 236 86 316

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 75 Feature Crossed: CAMPBELLS RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

421-12-04387A Not eligible32180Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 168 86 306

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: US 421 Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00004 Not eligible1200013Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 24.1 086 40.6

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 800 N Feature Crossed: DUNK CREEK

351

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00009 Not eligible1200017Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 23.5 086 32.7

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: 200 W Feature Crossed: CAMPBELLS RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00011 Not eligible1200019Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 19.0 086 29.0

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 120 E Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK WILDCAT CRE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00016 Not eligible1200024Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 23.2 086 34.9

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 700 N Feature Crossed: CRIPE RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00017 Not eligible1200025Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 23.2 086 39.5

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 700 N Feature Crossed: DUNK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00019 Not eligible1200027Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 25.1 086 37.1

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 600 W Feature Crossed: CAMPBELLS RUN

352

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00021 Not eligible1200029Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 23.6 086 36.2

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 750 N Feature Crossed: CRIPE RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00025 Not eligible1200033Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 23.6 086 40.0

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 850 W Feature Crossed: DUNK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00026 Not eligible1200034Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/14/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 19.1 086 34.8

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 400 W Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK WILDCAT CRE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00028 Not eligible1200035Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 22.0 086 39.3

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 800 W Feature Crossed: HOG RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00030 Not eligible1200037Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 22.4 086 40.5

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 900 W Feature Crossed: HOG RUN

353

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00032 Not eligible1200039Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 19.1 086 36.8

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 575 W Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK WILDCAT CRE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00034 Not eligible1200041Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 18.9 086 37.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 200 N Feature Crossed: SPRING CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00051 Not eligible1200055Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 18.0 086 37.5

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: 120 N Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF SPRING CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00053 Not eligible1200057Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 19.1 086 37.1

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 600 W Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK WILDCAT CRE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00059 Not eligible1200060Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 18.8 086 30.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 000 E/W Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK WILDCAT CRE

354

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00062 Not eligible1200063Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 19.7 086 24.5

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 300 N Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK WILDCAT CRE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00067 Not eligible1200067Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 19.3 086 27.7

Cont prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

605

//Feature Carried: 250 N Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK WILDCAT CRE

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

00070 Not eligible1200070Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 20.7 086 25.9

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 400 E Feature Crossed: KILMORE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00074 Not eligible1200073Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 19.3 086 23.8

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 250 N Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK WILDCAT CRE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00078 Not eligible1200077Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 20.6 086 19.6

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 400 N Feature Crossed: SWAMP CREEK

355

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00079 Not eligible1200078Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 19.0 086 23.0

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 650 E Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK WILDCAT CRE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00083 Not eligible1200081Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 18.2 086 22.4

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 710 E Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK WILDCAT CRE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00084 Not eligible1200082Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 19.2 086 26.9

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 250 N Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF KILMORE CREE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00092 Not eligible1200088Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 19.3 086 16.3

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: 1250 E Feature Crossed: SWAMP CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00093 Not eligible1200089Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 21.1 086 16.3

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 1250 E Feature Crossed: KILMORE CREEK

356

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00094 Not eligible1200090Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/14/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 21.2 086 15.4

Metal pipe arch-round pipe

319A

//Feature Carried: 1330 E Feature Crossed: KILMORE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00095 Not eligible1200091Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 20.8 086 17.4

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 1150 E Feature Crossed: KILMORE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00098 Not eligible1200094Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 18.5 086 20.2

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 900 E Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK WILDCAT CRE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00100 Not eligible1200095Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 18.4 086 21.1

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: 830 E Feature Crossed: SOUTH FORK WILDCAT CRE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00104 Not eligible1200098Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 11.9 086 20.9

Composite steel beam302G

//Feature Carried: 600 S Feature Crossed: STOWERS DITCH

357

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00114 Not eligible1200107Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 15.4 086 20.4

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 200 S Feature Crossed: SCOTT WINCOOP DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00115 Not eligible1200108Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 15.8 086 30.2

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: 150 S (KELLEY ST) Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00117 Not eligible1200110Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 15.7 086 27.7

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 150 S Feature Crossed: MANN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00118 Not eligible1200111Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 14.6 086 16.6

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 300 S Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00119 Not eligible1200112Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 13.7 086 17.8

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 400 S Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK

358

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00122 Not eligible1200114Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 12.7 086 23.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 500 S Feature Crossed: SCOTT WINCOOP DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00124 Not eligible1200116Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 12.1 086 22.5

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 580 S Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00128 Not eligible1200118Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 11.0 086 22.1

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 700 S Feature Crossed: MC CLAMROCK DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00130 Not eligible1200120Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 14.4 086 28.6

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: KIRKLIN BRICK ROAD Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00133 Not eligible1200122Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/14/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 14.3 086 28.4

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: 180 E Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

359

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00135 Not eligible1200123Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 13.4 086 29.2

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 100 E Feature Crossed: BRUSH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00137 Not eligible1200125Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 15.9 086 29.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 100 E Feature Crossed: MANN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00139 Not eligible1200127Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 12.1 086 32.6

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: 200 W Feature Crossed: BRUSH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00140 Not eligible1200128Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 11.4 086 29.6

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 650 S Feature Crossed: REAGAN RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00144 Not eligible1200131Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 17.4 086 35.4

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: 450 W Feature Crossed: HEAVILON DITCH

360

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00147 Not eligible1200134Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 12.9 086 30.4

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 000 E/W Feature Crossed: BRUSH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00148 Not eligible1200135Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 11.1 086 30.3

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 000 E/W Feature Crossed: REAGAN RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00149 Not eligible1200136Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 10.5 086 30.7

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 750 S Feature Crossed: REAGAN RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00156 Not eligible1200143Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 11.1 086 40.4

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 875 W Feature Crossed: WITHE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00158 Not eligible1200145Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 12.2 086 40.9

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: 930 W Feature Crossed: LITTLE POTATO CREEK

361

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00194 Not eligible1200150Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 11.0 086 14.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 1400 E Feature Crossed: PEARCE DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00202 Not eligible1200154Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/14/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 11.1 086 40.5

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: 700 S Feature Crossed: WITHE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00206 Not eligible1200158Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 17.9 086 30.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 100 N Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00207 Not eligible1200159Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 17.9 086 30.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 100 N Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00502 Not eligible1200003Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 17.2 086 30.3

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: GREEN STREET Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

362

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00507 Not eligible1200008Clinton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 16.6 086 30.6

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SOUTH STREET Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

037-13-08442 Not eligible11873Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 221 86 280

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: SR 37 Feature Crossed: BIRD HOLLOW CREEK

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

062-13-01450A Not eligible22270Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/18/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 115 86 194

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 62 Feature Crossed: DRY RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

062-13-06027B Not eligible22250Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 123 86 243

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 62 (SR 66) Feature Crossed: TURKEY FORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

062-13-08358 Not eligible22225Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 135 86 342

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: SR 62 Feature Crossed: BRANCH POTTS CREEK

363

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

064-13-01644 Not eligible23040Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 199 86 373

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 64 Feature Crossed: FLEMING CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

064-13-01996 Not eligible23080Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 224 86 203

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 64 (SR 66) Feature Crossed: WHISKEY RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

064-13-01999 Not eligible23110Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 219 86 193

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 64 (SR 66) Feature Crossed: CIDER FORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

064-13-03008A Not eligible23120Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/30/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 212 86 168

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 64 Feature Crossed: BLUE RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

064-13-04038 Not eligible23060Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 205 86 282

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 64 Feature Crossed: BIRD HOLLOW CREEK

364

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

064-13-04039B Not eligible23070Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/19/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 205 86 281

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 64 Feature Crossed: SR 37

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00004 Not eligible1300003Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/19/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 21.0 086 35.6

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: ALLEN CREEK RD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF PATOKA RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00008 Not eligible1300005Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 21.7 086 29.4

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: BROWNSTOWN RD Feature Crossed: BROWNSTOWN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00009 Not eligible1300006Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 21.2 086 28.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: DOG CREEK RD Feature Crossed: BIRD HOLLOW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00010 Not eligible1300007Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/30/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 21.8 086 21.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: TUNNEL RD Feature Crossed: BRANDYWINE FORK

365

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00012 Not eligible1300009Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 22.6 086 21.7

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: BACON HOLLOW RD Feature Crossed: WHISKEY RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00014 Not eligible1300011Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 23.2 086 22.7

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: BACON HOLLOW RD Feature Crossed: WHISKEY RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00018 Not eligible1300013Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 20.6 086 25.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: JONES RD Feature Crossed: CAMP FORK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00020 Not eligible1300015Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 18.3 086 26.3

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: MAGNOLIA RD Feature Crossed: BRUSHY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00023 Not eligible1300017Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 19.2 086 20.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: WHISKEY RUN RANCH Feature Crossed: SLICK RUN

366

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00024 Not eligible1300086Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 19.1 086 20.1

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: WHISKEY RUN RANCH Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF SLICK RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00026 Not eligible1300019Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/30/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 23.6 086 19.0

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: HARDINSBURG RD Feature Crossed: CIDER FORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00027 Not eligible1300020Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 18.4 086 32.4

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: GOVERNORS TRACE Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF OTTER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00028 Not eligible1300021Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 20.9 086 32.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: SYCAMORE RD Feature Crossed: SYCAMORE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00029 Not eligible1300022Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 19.0 086 18.4

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: PILOT KNOB RD Feature Crossed: SLICK RUN

367

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00030 Not eligible1300023Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 18.1 086 33.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: MIFFLIN WEST FORK Feature Crossed: OTTER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00034 Not eligible1300012Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/18/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 17.2 086 29.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: COLVERT ROLL RD Feature Crossed: OTTER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00035 Not eligible1300027Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 14.5 086 31.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: MIFFLIN WEST FORK Feature Crossed: REASOR BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00036 Not eligible1300028Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 13.5 086 31.6

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: BAKER RD Feature Crossed: STINKING FORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00056 Not eligible1300038Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/30/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 21.1 086 17.0

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: MILLTOWN RD Feature Crossed: WHISKEY RUN

368

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00067 Not eligible1300040Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/18/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 16.9 086 28.0

Steel pony truss310A

//Feature Carried: OLD STATE ROAD 37 Feature Crossed: LITTLE BLUE RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00076 Not eligible1300072Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 21.5 086 19.1

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: HOG TOWN RD Feature Crossed: WHISKEY RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00077 Not eligible1300041Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 18.3 086 33.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: HATFIELD RD Feature Crossed: OTTER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00090 Not eligible1300042Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 20.0 086 28.1

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 5TH ST Feature Crossed: LITTLE BLUE RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00092 Not eligible1300043Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 17.4 086 30.3

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: OTTER CREEK RD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF OTTER CREEK

369

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

00094 Not eligible1300045Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/18/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 15.0 086 23.5

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: MAGNOLIA RD Feature Crossed: JABY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00096 Not eligible1300047Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 15.4 086 18.7

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: SHAFER RIDGE RD Feature Crossed: DRY RUN

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

00097 Not eligible1300073Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/18/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 12.4 086 20.4

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: DRY RUN RD Feature Crossed: TEXAS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00099 Not eligible1300050Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 17.7 086 31.2

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: OLD FELKER RD Feature Crossed: OTTER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00101 Not eligible1300052Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 22.8 086 19.1

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: BAYLOR RD Feature Crossed: CIDER FORK

370

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00108 Not eligible1300054Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 21.4 086 32.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: ALSTOTT RD Feature Crossed: HIGHFILL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00109 Not eligible1300055Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 22.0 086 26.6

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: BEAN LN Feature Crossed: DOG CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00110 Not eligible1300056Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 21.6 086 26.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: HOOSIER ENERGY RD Feature Crossed: DOG CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00112 Not eligible1300058Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 21.3 086 37.1

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: ALLEN CREEK RD Feature Crossed: FLEMING CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00113 Not eligible1300059Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 18.4 086 40.3

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: MITCHELL CREEK RD Feature Crossed: ANDERSON RIVER

371

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00117 Not eligible1300063Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 17.3 086 36.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: KEMP RD Feature Crossed: MITCHELL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00122 Not eligible1300066Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/30/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 22.5 086 20.7

Steel pony truss310A

//Feature Carried: MAIN ST Feature Crossed: WHISKEY RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00124 Not eligible1300079Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 22.0 086 20.6

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: JEFFERSON ST Feature Crossed: BRANDYWINE FORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00126 Not eligible1300081Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/19/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 22.1 086 20.6

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: WASHINGTON ST Feature Crossed: BRANDYWINE FORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00127 Not eligible1300082Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 21.0 086 35.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: ALLEN CREEK RD Feature Crossed: BRANCH LITTLE PATOKA

372

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00131 Not eligible1300070Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 20.1 086 27.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: BEASLEY RD Feature Crossed: CAMP FORK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00132 Not eligible1300085Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 22.3 086 20.3

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: PLEASANT AVE Feature Crossed: WHISKEY RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00133 Not eligible1300087Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 18.3 086 32.4

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: NASH LN Feature Crossed: OTTER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00134 Not eligible1300088Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 14.8 086 31.7

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: ZELLER RD Feature Crossed: REASOR BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00135 Not eligible1300089Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 18.4 086 26.2

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: MOUNT STERLING RD Feature Crossed: BRUSHY CREEK

373

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00136 Not eligible1300090Crawford NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 16.0 086 34.1

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: WEST FORK RD Feature Crossed: STINKING FORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

050-14-03470 Not eligible18330Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 394 87 45

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: US 50 Feature Crossed: DRAINAGE DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

057-14-00426E Not eligible20640Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 431 87 100

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 57 Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

057-14-00510B Not eligible20620Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 363 87 117

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 57 Feature Crossed: VEALE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

057-14-04926A Not eligible20660Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 481 87 92

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 57 Feature Crossed: HANNA CREEK

374

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

058-14-03324 Not eligible20870Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 507 87 28

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 58 Feature Crossed: SMOTHERS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00023 Not eligible1400009Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 53.0 087 02.2

Reinforced concrete beam

102B

//Feature Carried: RD 700 E Feature Crossed: VERTREES DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00026 Not eligible1400011Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 48.9 087 09.6

Reinforced concrete box - under fill

119C

//Feature Carried: RD 50 E Feature Crossed: SMOTHERS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00035 Not eligible1400017Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 49.6 087 02.2

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: RD 700 E Feature Crossed: HAYES DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00036 Not eligible1400018Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 49.8 087 02.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 700 E Feature Crossed: KANE DITCH

375

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00044 Not eligible1400187Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 45.8 087 11.2

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: RD 100 W Feature Crossed: KILLION CANAL

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00058 Not eligible1400027Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 49.9 086 56.6

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: RD 1200 N Feature Crossed: NORTH FORK PRAIRIE CREE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00087 Not eligible1400046Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 48.9 087 04.7

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 475 E Feature Crossed: SMOTHERS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00088 Not eligible1400045Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 48.9 087 04.7

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 475 E Feature Crossed: EPSOM LATERAL

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00095 Not eligible1400051Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 48.0 086 56.3

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 975 N Feature Crossed: NORTH FORK PRAIRIE CREE

376

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00105 Not eligible1400060Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 45.8 086 59.9

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: RD 900 E Feature Crossed: NORTH FORK PRAIRIE CREE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00155 Not eligible1400193Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 40.0 087 02.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: THIRD STREET Feature Crossed: CSX RAILROAD

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00158 Not eligible1400102Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 37.3 086 56.6

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 1200 E Feature Crossed: HAW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00160 Not eligible1400103Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 33.3 086 57.6

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 700 S Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00161 Not eligible1400104Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 33.2 086 59.6

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 700 S Feature Crossed: WEST FORK SUGAR CREEK

377

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00191 Not eligible1400121Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 31.5 086 58.6

Composite steel beam302G

//Feature Carried: RD 900 S Feature Crossed: SUGAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00234 Not eligible1400145Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 36.7 087 09.6

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: RD 300 S Feature Crossed: VEALES CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00235 Not eligible1400146Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 34.5 087 08.8

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: RD 100 E Feature Crossed: AIKMAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00284 Not eligible1400200Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/26/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 39.4 087 09.1

Timber beam702A

//Feature Carried: SOUTHEAST 15TH ST Feature Crossed: CSX RAILROAD

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00313 Not eligible1400313Daviess NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 48.9 087 09.7

Reinforced concrete box - under fill

119C

//Feature Carried: RD 25 W Feature Crossed: UNNAMED TRIBUTARY

378

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

001-15-01299A Not eligible40Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 123 84 557

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 1 Feature Crossed: SLAB CAMP CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

001-15-01300A Not eligible30Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 117 84 545

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 1 Feature Crossed: BRUSHY FORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

001-15-04683A Not eligible50Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 168 84 577

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 1 Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-15-03033 Not eligible17480Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 169 84 566

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: LOGAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-15-03034 Not eligible17490Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 169 84 564

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: LOGAN CREEK

379

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-15-03035 Not eligible17500Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 169 84 563

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: LOGAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-15-03036 Not eligible17510Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/7/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 168 84 552

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: LOGAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-15-03037A Not eligible17520Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/13/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 168 84 545

Riveted plate girder302C

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: LOGAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-15-03054A Not eligible17530Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/13/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 167 84 530

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: LOGAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-15-04682A Not eligible17470Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 171 84 584

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: I-74

380

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

048-15-03127 Not eligible17880Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 112 85 44

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 48 Feature Crossed: NORTH HOGAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

050-15-01680 Not eligible18840Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 89 84 494

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: US 50 Feature Crossed: DOUBLE LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

050-15-02169A Not eligible18760Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 32 84 553

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: US 50 Feature Crossed: CSX RR & 2 STREETS

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

050-15-03159B Not eligible18770Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/14/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 36 84 541

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: US 50 Feature Crossed: HOGAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

062-15-03415A Not eligible22560Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 592 85 48

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: SR 62 Feature Crossed: HAYES BRANCH

381

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-160-04680A Not eligible45290Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 172 85 24

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: ST. PETERS ROAD Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00003 Not eligible1500002Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 00.0 084 58.1

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: LAUGHERY CREEK RD. Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF LAUGHERY CRE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00005 Not eligible1500004Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 01.1 084 55.6

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: LAUGHERY CREEK RD. Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF LAUGHERY CRE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00007 Not eligible1500006Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 01.1 085 05.1

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SPANGLER ROAD Feature Crossed: PETER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00013 Not eligible1500012Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 56.9 085 06.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: BELLS BRANCH ROAD Feature Crossed: BAUM HOLLOW CREEK

382

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00014 Not eligible1500013Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/15/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 56.8 085 06.1

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: BELLS BRANCH ROAD Feature Crossed: BAUM HOLLOW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00018 Not eligible1500016Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 58.5 085 02.6

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: LAUGHERY CREEK RD. Feature Crossed: MUD LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00025 Not eligible1500022Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 06.4 085 05.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: VOLTZ ROAD Feature Crossed: WHITAKER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00028 Not eligible1500025Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/7/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 04.3 084 57.5

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: NORTH HOGAN ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH NORTH HOGAN CR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00029 Not eligible1500026Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/7/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 04.5 084 57.8

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: NORTH HOGAN ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH NORTH HOGAN CR

383

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00032 Not eligible1500029Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 06.3 084 58.7

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: NORTH HOGAN ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH NORTH HOGAN CR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00033 Not eligible1500030Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 06.5 084 59.3

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: NORTH HOGAN ROAD Feature Crossed: LITTLE HOGAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00034 Not eligible1500031Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/7/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 04.6 084 57.8

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SHORT RIDGE ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH NORTH HOGAN CR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00038 Not eligible1500033Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/13/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 09.5 085 05.1

Rein conc girder (trans girder) floor beam system

103

//Feature Carried: SCHWIPPS ROAD Feature Crossed: WAHLER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00043 Not eligible1500038Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 09.2 084 59.8

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: PLATT ROAD Feature Crossed: FLYS RUN

384

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00044 Not eligible1500039Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 08.8 084 59.2

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: TURKEY POINT ROAD Feature Crossed: FLYS RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00048 Not eligible1500043Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/27/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 10.5 084 58.7

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: BONNELL ROAD Feature Crossed: BR. W. FORK TANNERS CK.

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00054 Not eligible1500049Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 10.1 084 55.7

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: COLLIER RIDGE ROAD Feature Crossed: BR. W. FORK TANNERS CK.

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00064 Not eligible1500059Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 13.1 084 53.2

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: SNEAKVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: SALT FORK TANNERS CREE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00072 Not eligible1500065Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 16.8 085 02.4

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: ST. PETERS ROAD Feature Crossed: EAST FORK TANNERS CREE

385

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00073 Not eligible1500066Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 16.9 085 02.4

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: ST. PETERS ROAD Feature Crossed: EAST FORK TANNERS CREE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00076 Not eligible1500069Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 13.7 084 50.1

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: JAMISON ROAD Feature Crossed: LITTLE JAMISON CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00082 Not eligible1500073Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 15.7 084 57.3

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: HYLAND ROAD Feature Crossed: ENNIS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00102 Not eligible1500081Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 14.0 085 01.8

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: N. DEARBORN ROAD Feature Crossed: TAYLOR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00107 Not eligible1500097Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/13/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 16.2 084 49.2

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: OLD US 52 Feature Crossed: KOLB CREEK

386

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00111 Not eligible1500085Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 11.4 085 04.5

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: BURNS ROAD Feature Crossed: NORTH HOGAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00138 Not eligible1500088Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/7/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 09.9 084 57.8

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: BONNELL ROAD Feature Crossed: BR. W. TANNERS CR./ACCS.

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00163 Not eligible1500095Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 02.7 084 55.4

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: INDIANA AVENUE Feature Crossed: BRANCH HOGAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00164 Not eligible1500098Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 02.4 085 03.6

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: LAUMAN ROAD Feature Crossed: SOUTH HOGAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00166 Not eligible1500100Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 16.0 085 02.3

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: LAWRENCEVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: EAST FORK TANNERS CREE

387

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00210 Not eligible1500103Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/7/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 04.7 084 55.5

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: CROSS ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF HOGAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00214 Not eligible1500107Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 14.5 084 56.1

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: N. DEARBORN ROAD Feature Crossed: SLAB CAMP CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00219 Not eligible1500112Dearborn NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 10.8 085 04.5

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: HOLT ROAD Feature Crossed: NORTH HOGAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system under Criterion C. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge is located on an important transportation route or crossing; however, it does not retain historic integrity necessary to convey historical significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion A.

(421)29-16-00908A Not eligible32070Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/14/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 161 85 231

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 421 Feature Crossed: V FORK MUSCATATUCK RIV

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

003-16-00776A Not eligible810Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 226 85 288

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 3 Feature Crossed: MUDDY FORK SAND CREEK

388

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

003-16-04330A Not eligible800Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 218 85 288

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: SR 3 Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-16-00945 Not eligible17400Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 202 85 308

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: MUDDY FORK SAND CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-16-03394 Not eligible17410Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 202 85 279

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: SAND CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

046-16-03395 Not eligible17420Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 193 85 238

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 46 Feature Crossed: COBBS FORK SAND CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

421)I74-132-04327BNB

Not eligible32120Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 218 85 310

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: US 421 NBL Feature Crossed: I-74 EBL

389

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-125-04301 Not eligible45010Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/15/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 263 85 356

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 700 NORTH Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-128-04299 Not eligible45040Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 243 85 336

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 420 WEST Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-133-04329 Not eligible45090Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 218 85 300

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 100 WEST Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-136-04332 Not eligible45140Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/15/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 211 85 267

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD NE 80 Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-138-04333 Not eligible45150Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 204 85 248

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: BASE ROAD Feature Crossed: I-74

390

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-141-04335 Not eligible45160Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 191 85 221

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 600 EAST Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-143-04336B Not eligible45170Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 190 85 196

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: NEW P'NT-ROSSB. RD Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00011 Not eligible1600005Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/15/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 18.5 085 24.0

Concrete tee beam104

//Feature Carried: 200S Feature Crossed: COBBS FORK SAND CREEK

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

00023 Not eligible1600013Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 21.5 085 37.1

Stone arch811

//Feature Carried: 700W Feature Crossed: CLIFTY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00025 Not eligible1600015Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/15/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 22.8 085 34.6

Rein conc girder (trans girder) floor beam system

103

//Feature Carried: 300N Feature Crossed: CLIFTY CREEK

391

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00032 Not eligible1600021Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 23.3 085 33.7

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: 421N Feature Crossed: CLIFTY CREEK

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

00046 Not eligible1600034Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 25.5 085 26.2

Stone arch811

//Feature Carried: 225E Feature Crossed: MIDDLE FORK CLIFTY CREE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00059 Not eligible1600047Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 22.8 085 19.4

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 300N Feature Crossed: FORK OF SALT CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00070 Not eligible1600054Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 20.8 085 17.9

Simple steel girder - floor beam system

303B

//Feature Carried: 50N Feature Crossed: SALT CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00071 Not eligible1600055Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/15/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 21.2 085 17.9

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 950E Feature Crossed: SALT CREEK

392

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00073 Not eligible1600057Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/15/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 21.5 085 18.5

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 150N Feature Crossed: FORK SALT CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00079 Not eligible1600195Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 18.1 085 19.5

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: 850 E Feature Crossed: TRIBUTARY TO TUB CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00086 Not eligible1600066Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 16.7 085 23.3

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 400S Feature Crossed: FK VERNON FK MUSCATATU

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

00090 Not eligible1600070Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 15.9 085 26.5

Stone arch811

//Feature Carried: 180E Feature Crossed: COBBS FORK SAND CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00094 Not eligible1600074Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/14/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 14.9 085 26.6

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 600S Feature Crossed: COBBS FORK SAND CREEK

393

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

00116 Not eligible1600094Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 16.6 085 30.4

Stone arch811

//Feature Carried: 400S Feature Crossed: SAND CREEK

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

00117 Not eligible1600095Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 16.7 085 31.7

Stone arch811

//Feature Carried: 400S Feature Crossed: MUDDY FORK SAND CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00120 Not eligible1600098Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/14/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 18.7 085 35.2

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 550W Feature Crossed: FALL FORK CLIFTY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00123 Not eligible1600100Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 18.9 085 34.0

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 450W Feature Crossed: FALL FORK CLIFTY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00129 Not eligible1600105Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 16.5 085 38.6

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 850W Feature Crossed: FALL FORK CLIFTY CREEK

394

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00130 Not eligible1600106Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 16.2 085 38.6

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 850W Feature Crossed: BR FALL FK CLIFTY CREEK

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

00135 Not eligible1600111Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 16.0 085 36.9

Stone arch811

//Feature Carried: 480S Feature Crossed: BR FALL FORK CLIFTY CR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00136 Not eligible1600112Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 16.3 085 37.8

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 750W Feature Crossed: BR FALL FORK CLIFTY CR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00141 Not eligible1600117Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 14.7 085 40.3

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 1000W Feature Crossed: FALL FORK CLIFTY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00153 Not eligible1600128Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 10.1 085 34.6

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 1150S Feature Crossed: MILLSTONE CREEK

395

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00163 Not eligible1600135Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/14/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 07.9 085 39.3

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 1400S Feature Crossed: RATTAIL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00164 Not eligible1600136Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 10.1 085 37.8

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 1300S Feature Crossed: TURNOVER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00165 Not eligible1600137Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 10.1 085 34.9

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: 1250S Feature Crossed: MILLSTONE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00167 Not eligible1600181Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 10.5 085 34.3

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: MAIN STREET Feature Crossed: MILLSTONE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00170 Not eligible1600141Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 09.9 085 31.0

Reinforced conrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 1100S Feature Crossed: ROCK CREEK

396

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00174 Not eligible1600145Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 11.1 085 31.5

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: SW60 Feature Crossed: PENTHER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00177 Not eligible1600148Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 12.0 085 30.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 100W Feature Crossed: PENTHER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00178 Not eligible1600149Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 11.4 085 31.0

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: 1000S Feature Crossed: PENTHER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00184 Not eligible1600155Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 12.3 085 27.1

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: 900S Feature Crossed: SQUARE RUN

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge is located on an important transportation route or crossing; however, it does not retain historic integrity necessary to convey historical significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion A. This bridge is associated with an important historical event or trend at the state or local level; however, it does not retain historic integrity necessary to convey historical significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion A.

00188 Not eligible1600158Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 21.1 085 30.9

Stone arch811

//Feature Carried: 240NW Feature Crossed: MUDDY FORK SAND CREEK

397

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00212 Not eligible1600171Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 20.3 085 34.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 500W Feature Crossed: BRANCH FALL FORK CLIFTY

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00236 Not eligible1600177Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 20.3 085 28.7

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: CENTRAL AVENUE Feature Crossed: GAS CREEK

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge is located on an important transportation route or crossing; however, it does not retain historic integrity necessary to convey historical significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion A.

00238 Not eligible1600179Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 20.0 085 29.0

Stone arch811

//Feature Carried: FRANKLIN STREET Feature Crossed: GAS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00239 Not eligible1600180Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 20.2 085 28.7

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: WASHINGTON STREET Feature Crossed: GAS CREEK

This bridge is an example of an early or distinctive phase in bridge construction, design, or engineering; however, it no longer retains the historic integrity necessary to convey its engineering significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

00252 Not eligible1600188Decatur NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/22/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 26.2 085 17.5

Stone arch811

//Feature Carried: 680N Feature Crossed: BULL CREEK

398

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(427)27-17-01697A Not eligible32520Dekalb NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 263 85 11

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 427 Feature Crossed: CEDAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

004-17-04715B Not eligible1500Dekalb NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 317 85 34

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: SR 4 Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

006-17-00538B Not eligible1860Dekalb NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 261 85 8

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: US 6 Feature Crossed: CEDAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

006-17-03843B Not eligible1870Dekalb NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 259 84 599

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: US 6 Feature Crossed: MATSON DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

006-17-03844B Not eligible1880Dekalb NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 259 84 512

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: US 6 Feature Crossed: BIG RUN

399

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

006-17-04695B Not eligible1850Dekalb NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 264 85 33

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: US 6 Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

008-17-04029A Not eligible2270Dekalb NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 220 85 101

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 8 Feature Crossed: LITTLE CEDAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

101-17-05096B Not eligible25220Dekalb NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 195 84 521

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: SR 101 Feature Crossed: ST. JOSEPH RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

205-17-03088A Not eligible28790Dekalb NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 183 85 103

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 205 Feature Crossed: LITTLE CEDAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-123-04603 Not eligible40500Dekalb NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 168 85 53

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 68 Feature Crossed: I-69

400

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-125-04604 Not eligible40510Dekalb NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 185 85 53

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 60 Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-126-04605A Not eligible40540Dekalb NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 197 85 53

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 11 A Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-130-04692A Not eligible40670Dekalb NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 229 85 45

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 36 A Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-132-04693A Not eligible40680Dekalb NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 245 85 37

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 27 Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-133-04694 Not eligible40690Dekalb NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 256 85 32

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 28 Feature Crossed: I-69

401

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-138-04714 Not eligible40740Dekalb NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 295 85 33

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 10 Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00046 Not eligible1700043Dekalb NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 22.3 085 07.0

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: CR 15 Feature Crossed: DIEHL DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00503 Not eligible1700132Dekalb NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 21.1 085 03.4

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: AUBURN DRIVE Feature Crossed: CEDAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(28)67-18-00742B Not eligible24260Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/5/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 170 85 186

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 28 Feature Crossed: MISSISSINEWA RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(35)28-18-00928A Not eligible7780Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 167 85 292

Composite steel beam302G

//Feature Carried: US 35 Feature Crossed: BIG KILLBUCK CREEK

402

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

028-18-06185B Not eligible7800Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 180 85 142

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: SR 28 Feature Crossed: HALFWAY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

032-18-04059 Not eligible10780Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 116 85 173

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 32 Feature Crossed: MUD CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

032-18-04860B Not eligible10730Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 71 85 342

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: SR 32 Feature Crossed: I-69 & SB COLLECTOR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

032-18-05441A Not eligible10750Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 105 85 296

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 32 Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

067-18-01902A Not eligible24165Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 85 85 261

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 67 SBL & ROAD Feature Crossed: NO NAME CREEK

403

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

167-18-01446B Not eligible28570Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 192 85 138

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: SR 167 Feature Crossed: HALFWAY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-30-04739A Not eligible39320Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 56 85 343

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 700 SOUTH Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-33-04742 Not eligible39380Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 81 85 341

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 400 SOUTH Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-36-04743 Not eligible39390Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 108 85 339

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 100 SOUTH Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-42-04747A Not eligible39470Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 155 85 335

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: CR 483N(BETHEL RD) Feature Crossed: I-69

404

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-44-04749A Not eligible39500Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 175 85 335

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 700 NORTH Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-47-04750A Not eligible39510Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 197 85 336

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 950 NORTH Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I69-49-04752 Not eligible39540Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 219 85 336

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 1200 NORTH Feature Crossed: I-69

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00001 Not eligible1800001Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 19.9 085 33.8

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: RD 925 W Feature Crossed: PIPE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00013 Not eligible1800011Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 21.8 085 27.4

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: RD 1200 N Feature Crossed: PIKE CREEK

405

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00015 Not eligible1800013Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 19.9 085 27.6

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: WHEELING AVENUE Feature Crossed: HAYDEN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00016 Not eligible1800196Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 22.6 085 26.9

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: RD 1275 N Feature Crossed: BIG LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00021 Not eligible1800017Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 21.0 085 25.5

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: RD 1100 N Feature Crossed: MISSISSINEWA RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00022 Not eligible1800018Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 21.0 085 25.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 1100 N Feature Crossed: DODGE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00027 Not eligible1800020Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 20.3 085 21.3

Composite steel girder302H

//Feature Carried: RD 175 E Feature Crossed: MISSISSINEWA RIVER

406

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00030 Not eligible1800022Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 20.1 085 20.1

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: RD 1000 N Feature Crossed: REES DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00035 Not eligible1800027Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 20.4 085 16.6

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: RD 600 E Feature Crossed: BOSMAN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00050 Not eligible1800040Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 20.7 085 27.9

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: WHEELING AVENUE Feature Crossed: HEDGELAND DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00051 Not eligible1800041Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 13.1 085 33.8

Composite continuous steel girder

402E

//Feature Carried: RD 200 N Feature Crossed: KILLBUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00054 Not eligible1800044Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 14.5 085 27.7

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 400 W Feature Crossed: EAGLE BRANCH CREEK

407

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00068 Not eligible1800057Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 14.6 085 30.0

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: RD 600 W Feature Crossed: JAKES CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00069 Not eligible1800058Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 16.3 085 30.0

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: RD 600 W Feature Crossed: KILLBUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00075 Not eligible1800064Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 16.0 085 24.3

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: RD 100 W Feature Crossed: KILLBUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00088 Not eligible1800073Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 15.8 085 13.6

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: RD 850 E Feature Crossed: MUD CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00092 Not eligible1800077Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 15.9 085 17.1

Concrete tee beam104

//Feature Carried: RD 520 N Feature Crossed: CAMPBELL CREEK

408

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00110 Not eligible1800092Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 06.0 085 26.6

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: RD 300 W Feature Crossed: WILLIAMS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00112 Not eligible1800094Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 06.4 085 27.2

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: RD 600 S Feature Crossed: WILLIAMS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00118 Not eligible1800099Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 05.5 085 29.5

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: RD 700 S Feature Crossed: BELL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00121 Not eligible1800102Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 07.2 085 31.8

Concrete tee beam104

//Feature Carried: RD 500 S Feature Crossed: SHOEMAKER DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00122 Not eligible1800214Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 10/17/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 06.8 085 28.7

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: OLD S.R. 67 Feature Crossed: BELL CREEK

409

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00123 Not eligible1800103Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 07.7 085 33.4

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: RIVER ROAD Feature Crossed: WHITE RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00125 Not eligible1800105Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 11.6 085 11.6

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: RD 400 W Feature Crossed: YORK PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00127 Not eligible1800107Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 11.9 085 30.0

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: RD 600 W Feature Crossed: YORK PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00132 Not eligible1800112Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 09.4 085 28.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 428 W Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00135 Not eligible1800115Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 08.1 085 27.9

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: RD 400 S Feature Crossed: BELL CREEK

410

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00138 Not eligible1800118Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 10.5 085 31.7

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: RD 750 W Feature Crossed: YORK PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00141 Not eligible1800121Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 10.8 085 29.7

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: RD 570 W, TIGER RD Feature Crossed: WHITE RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00159 Not eligible1800134Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 08.9 085 17.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 300 S Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00160 Not eligible1800135Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 08.3 085 16.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 566 E Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK RESERVOIR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00165 Not eligible1800139Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 07.4 085 15.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 700 E Feature Crossed: CUNNINGHAM DITCH

411

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00170 Not eligible1800143Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 06.3 085 16.7

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 600 S Feature Crossed: HUFFMAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00172 Not eligible1800145Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 07.2 085 16.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 550 E Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK RESERVOIR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00191 Not eligible1800154Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 08.1 085 25.2

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: RD 400 S Feature Crossed: NO NAME CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00194 Not eligible1800157Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 07.4 085 25.4

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: RD 200 W Feature Crossed: NO NAME CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00195 Not eligible1800203Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 09.4 085 23.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: MADISON AVENUE Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK

412

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00196 Not eligible1800519Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 07.9 085 25.4

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: RD 200 W Feature Crossed: NO NAME CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00198 Not eligible1800159Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 06.3 085 21.9

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: RD 578 S Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00204 Not eligible1800164Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 04.6 085 25.4

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: RD 200 W Feature Crossed: WILLIAMS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00205 Not eligible1800165Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 07.1 085 24.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 100 W Feature Crossed: NO NAME CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00209 Not eligible1800168Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 08.1 085 22.3

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: RD 400 S Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK

413

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00226 Not eligible1800172Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/5/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 05.8 085 18.1

Timber beam702A

//Feature Carried: RD 450 E Feature Crossed: RELIEF

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00244 Not eligible1800173Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 13.7 085 21.6

Composite steel beam302G

//Feature Carried: INDIANA AVENUE Feature Crossed: MUNCIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00245 Not eligible1800174Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 13.5 085 21.8

Concrete tee beam104

//Feature Carried: YALE AVENUE Feature Crossed: MUNCIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00270 Not eligible1800177Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 07.2 085 14.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RD 500 S Feature Crossed: CUNNINGHAM DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00501 Not eligible1800178Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 10.3 085 24.3

Concrete tee beam104

//Feature Carried: PORT AVENUE Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK

414

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00502 Not eligible1800179Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 10.3 085 23.6

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: GHARKEY STREET Feature Crossed: BUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00506 Not eligible1800183Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 12.2 085 23.0

Simple steel girder302E

//Feature Carried: ELM STREET Feature Crossed: WHITE RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00507 Not eligible1800204Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/5/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 12.7 085 22.5

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: WAID AVENUE Feature Crossed: MUNCIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00508 Not eligible1800205Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 12.9 085 22.4

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: BROADWAY AVENUE Feature Crossed: MUNCIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00513 Not eligible1800187Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 11.6 085 24.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: JACKSON STREET Feature Crossed: WHITE RIVER

415

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00514 Not eligible1800195Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/5/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 12.0 085 22.6

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: BROADWAY AVENUE Feature Crossed: WHITE RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00516 Not eligible1800189Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 11.2 085 25.4

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: TILLOTSON AVENUE Feature Crossed: WHITE RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00518 Not eligible1800191Delaware NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 12.3 085 26.3

Prestressed concrete box beam-spread

506

//Feature Carried: PETTY ROAD Feature Crossed: YORK PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(231)45-19-05164B Not eligible16670Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 204 86 570

Continuous prestressed concrete I-beam

602

//Feature Carried: US 231 Feature Crossed: HUNLEY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(231)45-19-05165B Not eligible16680Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 213 86 567

Continuous prestressed concrete I-beam

602

//Feature Carried: US 231 Feature Crossed: PATOKA RIVER

416

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

056-19-00178 Not eligible20000Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 250 87 2

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: SR 56 Feature Crossed: ALTAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

056-19-00179A Not eligible20010Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 240 86 580

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: SR 56 Feature Crossed: CROOKED CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

064-19-03003A Not eligible23010Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 186 86 502

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: SR 64 Feature Crossed: BRANCH FLAT CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

064-19-03591A Not eligible22970Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 179 86 600

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: SR 64 Feature Crossed: ELL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

064-19-03723A Not eligible22960Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 183 87 42

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 64 Feature Crossed: ROCK CREEK

417

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

162-19-02098B Not eligible28390Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 182 86 524

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 162 Feature Crossed: SOUTHERN RR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

162-19-03715B Not eligible28380Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 169 86 520

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 162 Feature Crossed: INDIAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

164-19-08747 Not eligible28456Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 228 86 460

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: SR 164 Feature Crossed: BRANCH HALL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

545-19-03268B Not eligible32900Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 270 86 487

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: SR 545 Feature Crossed: PATOKA RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00001 Not eligible1900001Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 29.4 087 01.2

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: PORTERSVILLE RD. W Feature Crossed: BIRCH CREEK

418

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00002 Not eligible1900002Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 27.8 087 01.5

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: 580 NORTH Feature Crossed: BIRCH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00004 Not eligible1900004Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 25.8 086 57.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: ACKERMAN ROAD Feature Crossed: MILL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00006 Not eligible1900006Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 23.0 086 59.4

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 450 WEST Feature Crossed: CROOKED CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00016 Not eligible1900012Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 24.0 087 00.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 150 NORTH Feature Crossed: ALTAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00019 Not eligible1900015Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 26.7 086 57.4

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: PORTERSVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: MILL CREEK

419

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00034 Not eligible1900028Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 25.6 086 47.3

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: CELESTINE RD NORTH Feature Crossed: BAUER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00041 Not eligible1900033Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 29.6 086 40.9

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: CUZCO-NORTON ROAD Feature Crossed: DILLON CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00059 Not eligible1900049Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 28.3 086 42.6

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 1050 EAST Feature Crossed: CANE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00096 Not eligible1900068Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 21.2 086 54.6

Composite steel beam302G

//Feature Carried: MERIDIAN ROAD Feature Crossed: STRAIGHT RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00105 Not eligible1900074Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 22.0 086 47.8

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: SANTINE ROAD Feature Crossed: HALL CREEK

420

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00106 Not eligible1900075Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 20.6 086 48.7

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: SANTINE ROAD Feature Crossed: GRASSY FORK HALL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00119 Not eligible1900085Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 14.7 086 50.8

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: CLUB ROAD Feature Crossed: GREEN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00122 Not eligible1900088Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 20.0 086 42.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: HARTS GRAVEL ROAD Feature Crossed: LICK FORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00128 Not eligible1900094Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 18.2 086 50.6

Concrete tee beam104

//Feature Carried: 550 SOUTH Feature Crossed: NO NAME DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00153 Not eligible1900117Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 17.5 086 55.7

Steel pony truss310A

//Feature Carried: 1ST STREET Feature Crossed: BRUNER CREEK

421

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00157 Not eligible1900120Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 14.7 086 53.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: FERDINAND ROAD NW Feature Crossed: HUNLEY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00158 Not eligible1900121Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 14.4 086 56.0

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: 950 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF BRUNER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00162 Not eligible1900124Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 15.3 086 54.2

Steel pony truss310A

//Feature Carried: 850 SOUTH Feature Crossed: HUNLEY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00168 Not eligible1900129Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 14.0 086 53.6

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: 1000 SOUTH Feature Crossed: HOLEY RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00171 Not eligible1900130Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/23/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 16.8 086 51.8

Rein conc girder (trans girder) floor beam system

103

//Feature Carried: OLD ROAD 162 Feature Crossed: INDIAN CREEK

422

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00183 Not eligible1900138Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 20.4 086 44.8

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: SCHNELLVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: HALL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00187 Not eligible1900143Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 23.0 087 01.2

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: DIVISION ROAD Feature Crossed: ALTAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00225 Not eligible1900156Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 31.2 086 42.1

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 1100 EAST Feature Crossed: BRANCH DAVIS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00244 Not eligible1900170Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 16.0 086 45.4

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: SCHNELL ROAD Feature Crossed: HURRICANE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00255 Not eligible1900188Dubois NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 22.8 086 56.6

Concrete tee beam104

//Feature Carried: WERNSING ROAD Feature Crossed: SENG DITCH

423

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(33)2-20-00972B Not eligible10990Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 388 85 561

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: US 33 Feature Crossed: YELLOW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

004-20-06106A Not eligible1480Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 353 85 496

Composite steel beam302G

//Feature Carried: SR 4 Feature Crossed: ROCK RUN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

006-20-01214A Not eligible1760Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 266 85 581

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 6 Feature Crossed: BERLIN COURT DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

013-20-03948A Not eligible3560Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 408 85 424

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 13 Feature Crossed: LITTLE ELKHART RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

020-20-03515A Not eligible5560Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 393 85 409

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: US 20 Feature Crossed: ROWE-EDEN DITCH

424

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

020-20-03516A Not eligible5570Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 393 85 403

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: US 20 Feature Crossed: LITTLE ELKHART RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

033-20-03937B Not eligible10960Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 289 85 424

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: US 33 Feature Crossed: DRY RUN

This bridge represents a phase or feature of the work of a master and it is distinguishable when compared with similar structures. However, it does not retain the historic integrity necessary to convey engineering or design significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C. This bridge possesses artistic value as illustrated through its overall design, outstanding architectural treatment, or notable use of ornamentation; however, it does not retain the historic integrity necessary to convey design significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system for Criterion A. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion A.

033-20-06193A Not eligible10980Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 354 85 505

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 33 Feature Crossed: ELKHART RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

119-20-04165B Not eligible25870Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 346 85 502

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 119 Feature Crossed: PUBLIC SERVICE CO. CANAL

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

[00401] Not eligibleXX018Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/17/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)

Steel pony truss310A

//Feature Carried: Oakridge Park Feature Crossed: Rock Run Creek

425

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00114 Not eligible2000008Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 45.2 085 51.3

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 2 Feature Crossed: WASHINGTON TWP DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00120 Not eligible2000177Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 43.9 085 55.6

Reinforced concrete box - under fill

119C

//Feature Carried: CO RD 13 Feature Crossed: PUTERBAUGH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00121 Not eligible2000011Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 43.0 085 56.4

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: CO RD 106 Feature Crossed: PUTERBAUGH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00122 Not eligible2000012Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 42.7 085 56.3

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 8/MILLER ST Feature Crossed: PUTERBAUGH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00126 Not eligible2000014Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 43.5 085 59.1

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 6 Feature Crossed: CHRISTIANA CREEK

426

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00141 Not eligible2000023Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 38.0 086 01.5

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 3 Feature Crossed: BAUGO CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00142 Not eligible2000182Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 37.3 086 01.3

Reinforced concrete box - under fill

119C

//Feature Carried: CO RD 3 Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF BAUGO CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00143 Not eligible2000025Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 37.2 086 01.3

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 3 Feature Crossed: BAUGO CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00145 Not eligible2000027Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 37.4 086 01.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 26 Feature Crossed: BAUGO CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00154 Not eligible2000031Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 38.0 085 55.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 13 Feature Crossed: YELLOW CREEK

427

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00155 Not eligible2000032Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 37.4 085 55.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 26 Feature Crossed: YELLOW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00160 Not eligible2000035Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 37.9 085 53.5

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 17 Feature Crossed: SAILOR DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00166 Not eligible2000040Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 40.9 085 52.9

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 14 Feature Crossed: PINE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00167 Not eligible2000041Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 39.6 085 52.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 18 Feature Crossed: PINE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00168 Not eligible2000042Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 39.2 085 51.6

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 19 Feature Crossed: PINE CREEK

428

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00183 Not eligible2000047Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 39.5 085 40.5

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 43 Feature Crossed: LITTLE ELKHART RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00190 Not eligible2000054Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 33.1 085 40.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 38 Feature Crossed: MCALLISTER DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00194 Not eligible2000057Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 31.4 085 40.9

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 42 Feature Crossed: STONY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00201 Not eligible2000058Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 35.8 085 44.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 35 Feature Crossed: ROCK RUN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00230 Not eligible2000070Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 35.7 085 56.1

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 30 Feature Crossed: YELLOW CREEK

429

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00236 Not eligible2000075Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 36.1 085 57.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 9 Feature Crossed: HOKE DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00244 Not eligible2000079Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 33.9 086 01.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 36 Feature Crossed: OLIVE TWP. DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00250 Not eligible2000081Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 35.6 086 01.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 30 Feature Crossed: BAUGO CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00253 Not eligible2000083Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 33.5 086 02.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 1 Feature Crossed: BAUGO CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00255 Not eligible2000085Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 32.8 086 02.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 1 Feature Crossed: BAUGO CREEK

430

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00257 Not eligible2000086Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 32.2 086 02.7

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 40 Feature Crossed: WISLER DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00258 Not eligible2000087Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 33.9 086 02.7

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 36 Feature Crossed: BAUGO CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00260 Not eligible2000089Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 35.2 086 02.7

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 130 Feature Crossed: BAUGO CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00269 Not eligible2000095Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 29.8 086 02.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 1 Feature Crossed: FISHER-GORDAN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00282 Not eligible2000102Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/17/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 27.0 086 59.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: HARTMAN STREET Feature Crossed: BERLIN COURT DITCH

431

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00289 Not eligible2000105Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 27.5 085 55.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 52 Feature Crossed: WAGNER DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00293 Not eligible2000108Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 26.6 085 54.9

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 56 Feature Crossed: WAGNER DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00297 Not eligible2000112Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 29.6 085 54.5

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 46 Feature Crossed: DAUSMAN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00309 Not eligible2000117Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 31.1 085 52.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 19 Feature Crossed: SWOVELAND DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00312 Not eligible2000120Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 30.9 085 50.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 142 Feature Crossed: TURKEY CREEK

432

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00315 Not eligible2000122Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 29.6 085 50.7

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 146 Feature Crossed: TURKEY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00317 Not eligible2000124Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 27.4 085 51.1

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 21 Feature Crossed: TURKEY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00319 Not eligible2000125Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 28.3 085 50.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 50 Feature Crossed: TURKEY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00323 Not eligible2000129Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 26.5 085 48.7

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 25 Feature Crossed: KIEFFER DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00326 Not eligible2000131Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 30.0 085 47.3

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 127 Feature Crossed: ELKHART RIVER

433

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00332 Not eligible2000133Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 31.1 085 48.6

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 142 Feature Crossed: ELKHART RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00333 Not eligible2000134Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 31.0 085 48.9

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 142 Feature Crossed: BENTON CANAL

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00340 Not eligible2000139Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 28.0 085 43.7

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 50 Feature Crossed: SOLOMON CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00342 Not eligible2000141Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 27.5 085 43.2

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 52 Feature Crossed: SOLOMON CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00345 Not eligible2000143Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 26.2 085 42.1

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: CO RD 58 Feature Crossed: MEYER DITCH

434

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00357 Not eligible2000149Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 29.4 085 45.1

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: CO RD 33 Feature Crossed: SOLOMON CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00358 Not eligible2000150Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 30.0 085 45.1

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: CO RD 33 Feature Crossed: DRY RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00360 Not eligible2000151Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 41.3 085 58.9

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SHERMAN STREET Feature Crossed: ST. JOSEPH RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00361 Not eligible2000152Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 41.7 085 58.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: NORTH MAIN STREET Feature Crossed: CHRISTIANA CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00371 Not eligible2000157Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 40.9 085 57.4

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: MIDDLEBURY STREET Feature Crossed: ELKHART RIVER

435

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00380 Not eligible2000162Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 41.6 085 58.0

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: BEARDSLEY AVENUE Feature Crossed: CHRISTIANA CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00385 Not eligible2000164Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 39.6 085 55.9

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: HIVELY AVENUE Feature Crossed: YELLOW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00388 Not eligible2000166Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 41.9 085 54.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: SHORELANE STREET Feature Crossed: SHORELANE CANAL

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00400 Not eligible2000167Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 34.8 085 48.7

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: MONROE STREET Feature Crossed: ROCK RUN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00402 Not eligible2000169Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 35.9 085 50.9

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: INDIANA AVENUE Feature Crossed: ROCK RUN CREEK

436

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00405 Not eligible2000171Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 35.7 085 50.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: FIRST STREET Feature Crossed: ROCK RUN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00409 Not eligible2000175Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 33.1 085 50.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 38 Feature Crossed: ELKHART RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00410 Not eligible2000176Elkhart NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 34.0 085 47.6

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: CO RD 36 Feature Crossed: HORN DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

001-21-00988A Not eligible120Fayette NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 349 85 61

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 1 Feature Crossed: WILSON CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00008 Not eligible2100007Fayette NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 46.8 085 13.3

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: ROAD 450 WEST Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF SYMONS CREEK

437

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00048 Not eligible2100041Fayette NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 32.9 085 11.6

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: ROAD 650 SOUTH Feature Crossed: N BRANCH OF GARRISON CR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00051 Not eligible2100044Fayette NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/11/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 35.0 085 14.9

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: ROAD 400 SOUTH Feature Crossed: N BRANCH OF GARRISON CR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00056 Not eligible2100049Fayette NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 32.0 085 15.5

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: JOHNSON SCHOOL RD. Feature Crossed: SANES CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00061 Not eligible2100054Fayette NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/11/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 36.3 085 04.4

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: ROAD 350 EAST Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF VILLAGE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00062 Not eligible2100055Fayette NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 36.8 085 04.4

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: ROAD 350 EAST Feature Crossed: VILLAGE CREEK

438

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00082 Not eligible2100087Fayette NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 37.7 085 06.7

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: ROAD 150 EAST Feature Crossed: VILLAGE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00086 Not eligible2100071Fayette NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/11/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 37.0 085 04.2

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: ALQUINA ROAD Feature Crossed: VILLAGE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00088 Not eligible2100073Fayette NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 39.6 085 02.3

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SPRINGERSVILLE RD. Feature Crossed: SIMPSON CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00090 Not eligible2100075Fayette NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 40.8 085 07.3

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: ROAD 100 EAST Feature Crossed: LICK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00130 Not eligible2100082Fayette NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/11/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 34.8 085 05.9

Concrete tee beam104

//Feature Carried: ROAD 420 SOUTH Feature Crossed: WILSON CREEK

439

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00533 Not eligible2100085Fayette NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 38.6 085 10.4

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: COUNTRY CLUB ROAD Feature Crossed: LITTLE WILLIAMS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(111)62-22-01798B Not eligible25580Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 167 85 501

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 111 Feature Crossed: FALLING RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system under Criterion C. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge is located on an important transportation route or crossing; however, it does not retain historic integrity necessary to convey historical significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion A.

(311)31W-22-01179A Not eligible31290Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 214 85 474

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 311 Feature Crossed: JACOBS CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(62X)62-22-04278B Not eligible22340Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 181 85 475

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 62X Feature Crossed: SILVER CREEK & FR. RD.

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

064-22-01445 Not eligible23160Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 178 85 592

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 64 Feature Crossed: GEORGETOWN CREEK

440

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

111-22-03367B Not eligible25560Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 141 85 513

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 111 Feature Crossed: FRENCH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

111-22-03368A Not eligible25570Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 162 85 507

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: SR 111 Feature Crossed: MIDDLE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

111-22-05107 Not eligible25610Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 238 85 486

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 111 Feature Crossed: BRANCH ELK RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

150-22-05230AEBL Not eligible27620Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 187 85 538

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: US 150 EBL Feature Crossed: LITTLE INDIAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

150-22-05230AWBL Not eligible27630Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 187 85 538

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: US 150 WBL Feature Crossed: LITTLE INDIAN CREEK

441

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00003 Not eligible2200003Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 7/2/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 23.8 085 55.9

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: CHAPEL HILL Feature Crossed: THOMPSON CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00013 Not eligible2200012Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 23.2 085 52.3

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: BANET ROAD Feature Crossed: BIG INDIAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00021 Not eligible2200020Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 20.4 085 56.5

Steel pony truss310A

//Feature Carried: JOHN PECTOL ROAD Feature Crossed: LITTLE INDIAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00028 Not eligible2200027Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 19.4 086 00.4

Precast concrete beam - channel beam

122

//Feature Carried: G'TOWN-GREENVILLE Feature Crossed: RICHLAND CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00036 Not eligible2200035Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 17.5 085 58.4

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: WISSMAN ROAD Feature Crossed: GEORGETOWN CREEK

442

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00038 Not eligible2200037Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 17.6 085 57.4

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: BAYLOR-WISSMAN RD. Feature Crossed: GEORGETOWN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00039 Not eligible2200038Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 22.0 085 50.8

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: MOSER KNOB Feature Crossed: LITTLE INDIAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00043 Not eligible2200042Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 19.9 085 52.4

Continuous concrete tee beam

204

//Feature Carried: SCOTTSVILLE ROAD Feature Crossed: LITTLE INDIAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00044 Not eligible2200043Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 20.3 085 52.1

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: ST. MARY'S ROAD Feature Crossed: LITTLE INDIAN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00060 Not eligible2200054Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 23.2 085 57.6

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: BORDEN ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH JERSEY PARK CRE

443

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00063 Not eligible2200057Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 12.8 085 53.9

Steel pony truss310A

//Feature Carried: FIVE MILE LANE Feature Crossed: KNOB CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00064 Not eligible2200058Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 12.0 085 53.5

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SEVEN MILE LANE Feature Crossed: KNOB CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00071 Not eligible2200060Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 15.4 085 51.8

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: TWO MILE LANE Feature Crossed: FRENCH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00080 Not eligible2200064Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 11.5 085 54.6

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: SEVEN MILE LANE Feature Crossed: STEWART CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00085 Not eligible2200067Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 22.0 086 01.7

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: BRADFORD ROAD Feature Crossed: CORN CREEK

444

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00501 Not eligible2200074Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 17.9 085 49.6

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: BINFORD PARK ST. Feature Crossed: FALLING RUN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00502 Not eligible2200075Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 16.4 085 50.1

Reinforced concrete box - under fill

119C

//Feature Carried: FLOYD STREET Feature Crossed: FALLING RUN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00504 Not eligible2200077Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 16.8 085 50.2

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SPRING HILL ROAD Feature Crossed: FALLING RUN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00506 Not eligible2200079Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 18.9 085 49.8

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: PAMELA DRIVE Feature Crossed: FALLING RUN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00507 Not eligible2200080Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/21/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 16.7 085 51.7

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: WILLIAM LANE Feature Crossed: MIDDLE CREEK

445

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00513 Not eligible2200085Floyd NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)38 17.3 085 49.8

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: STATE STREET Feature Crossed: FALLING RUN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(136)34-23-03044 Not eligible26820Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 59 87 71

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 136 Feature Crossed: HANNAH CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

(136)34-23-03045 Not eligible26830Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 55 87 63

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 136 Feature Crossed: EAST FORK COAL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

032-23-03796 Not eligible10440Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 23 87 91

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: SR 32 Feature Crossed: LIVENGOOD BRANCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

032-23-05069B Not eligible10390Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/30/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 37 87 211

Cont prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

605

//Feature Carried: SR 32 Feature Crossed: GRAHAM CREEK

446

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

041-23-02359ANBL Not eligible15260Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 79 87 146

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: US 41 NBL Feature Crossed: ABANDONED RR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

041-23-02359ASBL Not eligible15270Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 79 87 146

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: US 41 SBL Feature Crossed: ABANDONED RR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

041-23-02369ANBL Not eligible15200Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 68 87 146

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: US 41 NBL Feature Crossed: ABANDONED RR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

041-23-02369ASBL Not eligible15210Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 68 87 146

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: US 41 SBL Feature Crossed: ABANDONED RR

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

041-23-03289 Not eligible15310Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 157 87 146

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 41 Feature Crossed: BR BIG SHAWNEE CREEK

447

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

041-23-03738A Not eligible15170Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/29/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 28 87 146

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: US 41 Feature Crossed: PRAIRIE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

041-23-03885A Not eligible15280Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/30/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 120 87 146

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 41 Feature Crossed: COAL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

041-23-03887A Not eligible15300Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 146 87 146

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 41 Feature Crossed: BIG SHAWNEE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

041-23-03930C Not eligible15160Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 8 87 146

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: US 41 Feature Crossed: MILL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

041-23-03932A Not eligible15190Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 58 87 146

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: US 41 Feature Crossed: EAST FORK COAL CREEK

448

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

041-23-04932ANBL Not eligible15220Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 75 87 146

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: US 41 NBL Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

041-23-04932ASBL Not eligible15230Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 75 87 146

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: US 41 SBL Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

041-23-04981ANBL Not eligible15240Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 77 87 146

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: US 41 NBL Feature Crossed: DRY RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

041-23-04981ASBL Not eligible15250Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 77 87 146

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: US 41 SBL Feature Crossed: DRY RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

136-23-03964A Not eligible26800Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 80 87 212

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: US 136 Feature Crossed: GRAHAM CREEK

449

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

234-23-01230 Not eligible29600Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 581 87 122

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 234 Feature Crossed: BUFFALO CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

341-23-04026A Not eligible31760Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 125 87 90

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 341 Feature Crossed: LITTLE SHAWNEE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

341-23-04027A Not eligible31770Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/30/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 156 87 90

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SR 341 Feature Crossed: BIG SHAWNEE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

341-23-04028 Not eligible31780Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 165 87 90

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 341 Feature Crossed: SLUSH RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

341-23-04934A Not eligible31720Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 72 87 90

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 341 Feature Crossed: I-74

450

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-12-04927A Not eligible43910Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 75 87 163

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: CORP. LINE ROAD Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-16-04933A Not eligible43960Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 72 87 121

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: EPPERSON ROAD Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-22-04935 Not eligible43970Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 66 87 56

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: COUNTY LINE ROAD Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-6-04418A Not eligible43840Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 74 87 240

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: RIVER ROAD Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-7-04419B Not eligible43850Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 74 87 229

Continuous prestressed concrete I-beam

602

//Feature Carried: COV.-STRING. ROAD Feature Crossed: I-74

451

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-8-04593B Not eligible43860Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 73 87 216

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: COV.-CRAW. ROAD Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00004 Not eligible2300002Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 01.6 087 22.8

Reinforced concrete beam

102B

//Feature Carried: 620 WEST Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF COAL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00009 Not eligible2300007Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 00.7 087 16.6

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 800 SOUTH Feature Crossed: MILL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00010 Not eligible2300008Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 01.3 087 15.7

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: WASHINGTON STREET Feature Crossed: MILL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00021 Not eligible2300019Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 57.1 087 18.1

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 1200 SOUTH Feature Crossed: WEST FORK OF RUSH CREE

452

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00026 Not eligible2300024Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 00.7 087 13.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 800 SOUTH Feature Crossed: MILL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00027 Not eligible2300025Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 59.8 087 15.5

Encased steel beam302A

//Feature Carried: 900 SOUTH Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF MILL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00039 Not eligible2300032Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/29/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 59.8 087 07.7

Steel pony truss310A

//Feature Carried: 900 SOUTH Feature Crossed: SUGAR MILL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00044 Not eligible2300037Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 59.7 087 07.2

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 750 EAST Feature Crossed: STILLWATER CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00068 Not eligible2300056Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 05.7 087 16.3

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: 200 SOUTH Feature Crossed: COAL CREEK

453

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00071 Not eligible2300059Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/29/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 05.8 087 19.6

Reinforced concrete beam

102B

//Feature Carried: 200 SOUTH Feature Crossed: MUD CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00093 Not eligible2300072Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 10.3 087 11.8

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: 300 NORTH Feature Crossed: TURKEY RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00095 Not eligible2300073Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 08.7 087 10.1

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 500 EAST Feature Crossed: DRY RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00096 Not eligible2300074Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/30/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 09.7 087 10.1

Reinforced concrete beam

102B

//Feature Carried: 500 EAST Feature Crossed: TURKEY RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00105 Not eligible2300082Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/30/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 13.0 087 13.5

Steel pony truss310A

//Feature Carried: 200 EAST Feature Crossed: LITTLE SHAWNEE CREEK

454

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00108 Not eligible2300085Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 10.5 087 12.1

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 325 EAST Feature Crossed: TURKEY RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00110 Not eligible2300087Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 08.9 087 10.9

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 425 EAST Feature Crossed: DRY RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00116 Not eligible2300090Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 08.6 087 21.2

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 100 NORTH Feature Crossed: GRAHAM CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00138 Not eligible2300108Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 13.3 087 14.4

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 650 NORTH Feature Crossed: LITTLE SHAWNEE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00140 Not eligible2300110Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 14.5 087 14.2

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: 140 EAST Feature Crossed: BIG SHAWNEE CREEK

455

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00147 Not eligible2300115Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 14.4 087 15.5

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: 780 NORTH Feature Crossed: LITTLE SHAWNEE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00149 Not eligible2300116Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/25/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 18.6 087 16.4

Reinforced concrete beam

102B

//Feature Carried: 600 EAST Feature Crossed: OPOSSUM HOLLOW

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00150 Not eligible2300117Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 19.7 087 09.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: RIVERSIDE ROAD Feature Crossed: OPOSSUM HOLLOW

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00165 Not eligible2300150Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 06.6 087 15.0

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: OLD US 41 Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF COAL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00175 Not eligible2300124Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 57.3 087 10.6

Reinforced concrete slab - under fill

119A

//Feature Carried: ZACHMIRE ROAD Feature Crossed: WOLF CREEK

456

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00176 Not eligible2300125Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 57.3 087 09.8

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 520 EAST Feature Crossed: WOLF CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00202 Not eligible2300131Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 10.0 087 15.5

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 30 EAST Feature Crossed: COAL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00204 Not eligible2300133Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 01.7 087 22.5

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: 600 WEST Feature Crossed: COAL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00205 Not eligible2300134Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/30/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 07.7 087 12.3

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 250 EAST Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF DRY RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00244 Not eligible2300143Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 12.4 087 06.9

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 775 EAST Feature Crossed: LITTLE SHAWNEE CREEK

457

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00245 Not eligible2300144Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 14.6 087 10.4

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: 475 EAST Feature Crossed: KELL DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00246 Not eligible2300145Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 18.1 087 12.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: RIVER ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH OF WABASH RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00247 Not eligible2300146Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 15.5 087 05.8

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: 870 EAST Feature Crossed: WALLACE DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00251 Not eligible2300152Fountain NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 06.1 087 11.8

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: 350 EAST Feature Crossed: EAST FORK OF COAL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

001-24-00041A Not eligible110Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 310 85 48

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 1 Feature Crossed: DUCK CREEK

458

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

001-24-00201B Not eligible100Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 309 85 47

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 1 Feature Crossed: LITTLE DUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

001-24-00987A Not eligible80Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 266 85 15

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 1 Feature Crossed: BUTLERS RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

001-24-01120 Not eligible90Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 269 85 19

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 1 Feature Crossed: BUTLERS RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

052-24-00039A Not eligible19440Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 233 84 592

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 52 Feature Crossed: LITTLE CEDAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system under Criterion C. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criterion C.This bridge is located on an important transportation route or crossing; however, it does not retain historic integrity necessary to convey historical significance. As such, it is not eligible under Criterion A.

052-24-00824A Not eligible19410Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/11/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 263 85 37

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 52 Feature Crossed: YELLOW BANK CREEK

459

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

052-24-03883A Not eligible19450Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 215 84 565

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: US 52 Feature Crossed: BIG CEDAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

052-24-05101 Not eligible19370Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/12/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 294 85 155

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: US 52 Feature Crossed: LITTLE SALT CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

121-24-04153B Not eligible25970Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 316 85 106

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: SR 121 Feature Crossed: GARRISON CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

121-24-05097B Not eligible25960Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 296 85 121

Composite continuous steel beam

402D

//Feature Carried: SR 121 Feature Crossed: SANES CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

121-24-08022 Not eligible25940Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 280 85 112

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: SR 121 Feature Crossed: SILLIMANS CREEK

460

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

252-24-03800A Not eligible30790Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 249 84 543

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 252 Feature Crossed: BIG CEDAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

252-24-06008B Not eligible30800Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 249 84 542

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: SR 252 Feature Crossed: BRANCH BIG CEDAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-145-04337A Not eligible45180Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 191 85 178

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: ENOCHSBURG ROAD Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

I74-148-04339 Not eligible45210Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 190 85 144

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: CO ROAD 800 SOUTH Feature Crossed: I-74

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00002 Not eligible2400002Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 30.7 085 16.5

Concrete tee beam104

//Feature Carried: SANES CREEK Feature Crossed: LITTLE SALT CREEK

461

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00010 Not eligible2400102Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 28.8 085 07.1

Metal pipe arch-round pipe

311

//Feature Carried: DUCK CREEK ROAD Feature Crossed: DUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00012 Not eligible2400005Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 29.3 085 13.0

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: OLD US 52 Feature Crossed: LITTLE SANES CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00042 Not eligible2400026Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 25.1 085 04.1

Concrete tee beam104

//Feature Carried: SNAIL CREEK ROAD Feature Crossed: SNAIL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00046 Not eligible2400030Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 25.9 085 06.7

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: SILVER CREEK ROAD Feature Crossed: PIPE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00049 Not eligible2400033Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 25.7 085 03.3

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: LEVEE ROAD Feature Crossed: SNAIL CREEK

462

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00051 Not eligible2400035Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 26.2 084 59.6

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: OXFORD PIKE Feature Crossed: BRANCH WHITEWATER RIVE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00052 Not eligible2400036Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 26.2 084 59.0

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: OXFORD PIKE Feature Crossed: BR W FK WHITEWATER RIVE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00057 Not eligible2400039Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 25.0 085 02.3

Reinforced concrete girder

102A

//Feature Carried: ST MARYS ROAD Feature Crossed: MCCARTYS RUN

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00059 Not eligible2400041Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/12/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 23.8 085 00.9

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: HIGHLAND CENTER RD Feature Crossed: BLUE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00061 Not eligible2400043Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 25.2 084 54.4

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: BIG CEDAR RD NORTH Feature Crossed: BIG CEDAR CREEK

463

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00062 Not eligible2400044Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/16/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 25.6 084 50.7

Rein conc girder (trans girder) floor beam system

103

//Feature Carried: MERRILL ROAD Feature Crossed: DRY FK WHITEWATER RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00067 Not eligible2400046Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 27.1 084 52.9

Concrete tee beam104

//Feature Carried: URBAN ROAD Feature Crossed: BIG CEDAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00070 Not eligible2400049Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 17.3 085 16.7

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: POCKET ROAD Feature Crossed: WALNUT FK LAUGHERY CRE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00071 Not eligible2400105Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 17.6 085 16.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: MID ROAD Feature Crossed: WALNUT FORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00075 Not eligible2400051Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 19.3 085 10.6

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SAW MILL ROAD Feature Crossed: CLEAR FORK PIPE CREEK

464

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00082 Not eligible2400056Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/12/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 21.1 085 06.3

Concrete tee beam104

//Feature Carried: PIPE CREEK ROAD Feature Crossed: RUSSELL BR PIPE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00092 Not eligible2400063Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/12/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 23.1 085 01.8

Concrete tee beam104

//Feature Carried: BLUE CREEK ROAD Feature Crossed: NEUKAM BRANCH BLUE CRE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00094 Not eligible2400065Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 20.7 085 01.9

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: BLUE CREEK ROAD Feature Crossed: EAST FORK BLUE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00103 Not eligible2400073Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 21.4 084 50.2

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: DREWERSBURG ROAD Feature Crossed: SATER RUN OF DRYFORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00110 Not eligible2400112Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 23.1 085 13.1

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: RAIL FENCE ROAD Feature Crossed: SALT CREEK

465

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00117 Not eligible2400077Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 8/12/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 18.3 085 14.4

Concrete tee beam104

//Feature Carried: COLUMBUS AVENUE Feature Crossed: LITTLE LAUGHERY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00124 Not eligible2400078Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 20.3 085 06.8

Reinforced concrete slab - under fill

119A

//Feature Carried: SUNMAN ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH PIPE CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00131 Not eligible2400080Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 22.7 084 50.1

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: SPARKS ROAD Feature Crossed: SOURS RUN OF DRYFORK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00135 Not eligible2400081Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 21.2 084 56.5

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: GRAF ROAD Feature Crossed: BRANCH WHITEWATER RIVE

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00136 Not eligible2400082Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 28.0 085 08.9

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: LTL DUCK CREEK RD Feature Crossed: LITTLE DUCK CREEK

466

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00139 Not eligible2400084Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 6/24/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 23.2 085 03.8

Composite steel beam302G

//Feature Carried: WOLF CREEK ROAD Feature Crossed: WOLF CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00157 Not eligible2400095Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 24.5 084 59.1

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: L CEDAR CREEK ROAD Feature Crossed: LITTLE CEDAR CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00160 Not eligible2400096Franklin NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)39 27.0 085 03.4

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: YELLOW BANK CRK RD Feature Crossed: YELLOW BANK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

017-25-03297 Not eligible4450Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 19 86 252

Reinforced concrete slab101A

//Feature Carried: SR 17 Feature Crossed: STAR ARM WILLOW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

017-25-03298 Not eligible4460Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 24 86 252

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 17 Feature Crossed: LITTLE MILL CREEK

467

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

017-25-04127A Not eligible4490Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 91 86 261

Continuous reinforced concrete girder

202A

//Feature Carried: SR 17 Feature Crossed: TIPPECANOE RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

025-25-01537 Not eligible6550Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 75 86 101

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 25 Feature Crossed: HERREL CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

025-25-01538 Not eligible6560Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 83 86 92

Reinforced concrete arch111A

//Feature Carried: SR 25 Feature Crossed: WILLOW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

025-25-01539A Not eligible6570Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 103 86 73

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: SR 25 Feature Crossed: YELLOW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

110-25-03446A Not eligible25470Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 104 86 208

Reinforced concrete arch - under fill

119B

//Feature Carried: SR 110 Feature Crossed: COWAN DITCH

468

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

110-25-04126B Not eligible25490Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 104 86 77

Continuous steel beam402A

//Feature Carried: SR 110 Feature Crossed: TIPPECANOE RIVER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00044 Not eligible2500021Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: 9/18/2007Latitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 05.9 086 09.5

Steel pony truss310A

//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 300 W Feature Crossed: CHIPPEWANUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00045 Not eligible2500022Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 05.3 086 07.8

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 600 E Feature Crossed: BRYANT-LEININGER

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00058 Not eligible2500027Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 09.6 086 06.6

Continuous reinforced concrete slab

201A

//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 700 N Feature Crossed: LITTLE YELLOW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00059 Not eligible2500028Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 10.2 086 07.0

Prestressed concrete I-beam

502

//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 700 E Feature Crossed: BIG YELLOW CREEK

469

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00060 Not eligible2500029Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 10.1 086 06.8

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 775 N Feature Crossed: BIG YELLOW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00079 Not eligible2500032Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 04.0 086 06.9

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 700 E Feature Crossed: CHIPPEWANUCK CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00081 Not eligible2500034Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 00.1 086 07.0

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 700 E Feature Crossed: RAIN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00088 Not eligible2500037Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 00.9 086 08.9

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 250 S Feature Crossed: RAIN CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00099 Not eligible2500042Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 58.1 086 13.0

Precast concrete arch - under fill

119E

//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 600 S Feature Crossed: MUD CREEK

470

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00106 Not eligible2500047Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 59.8 086 16.7

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 400 S Feature Crossed: MUD CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00134 Not eligible2500053Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 04.1 086 21.9

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 100 N Feature Crossed: COLLINS DITCH

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00161 Not eligible2500065Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 56.1 086 23.7

Simple steel beam302D

//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 800 W Feature Crossed: GRASSY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00167 Not eligible2500067Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 56.3 086 27.1

Prestressed concrete box beam-multiple

505

//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 1100 W Feature Crossed: GRASSY CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00172 Not eligible2500071Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)40 56.4 086 26.0

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: COUNTY ROAD 1000 W Feature Crossed: GRASSY CREEK

471

Section 2. Listing of Non-Historic Bridges

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00501 Not eligible2500081Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 04.0 086 12.6

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: INDIANA AVENUE Feature Crossed: MINNOW CREEK

This bridge does not appear to possess significance under the National Register evaluation system. No evidence was found during data collection activities to indicate that this bridge is an important example of bridge design, engineering, or construction or that it possesses a significant association with important historical events or trends. As such, it is recommended not eligible under Criteria A and C.

00502 Not eligible2500082Fulton NBI No.Bridge No.

Survey date: NALatitude (degrees/minutes) Longitude (degrees/minutes)41 04.2 086 12.8

Multiplate arch - under fill319A

//Feature Carried: 4TH STREET Feature Crossed: MINNOW CREEK

472