1968: atmospheric optical measurements in the...

32
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY VISIBILITY LABORATORY SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92152 ATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF CRATER LAKE, OREGON. PART II. Almerian R. Boileau DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED SIO Ref. 68-19 July 1968 AFCRL, U. S. Air Force, Bedford, Massachusetts Air Force Tasks P-7621 and P66220 Naval Ship Systems Command, Washington, D. C. Contract NObsr-95251, Task II Project Serial No. SF0180201, Task 538 Approved: Seibert Q. Duntley, Director Visibility Laboratory Approved for Distribution: hilL^ Q ^JL^ William A. Nierenberg, Director Scripps Institution of Oceanography

Upload: voduong

Post on 24-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO

SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY

VISIBILITY LABORATORY

SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92152

ATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY

OF CRATER LAKE, OREGON. PART II.

Almerian R. Boileau

DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED

SIO Ref. 68-19

July 1968

AFCRL, U. S. Air Force, Bedford, Massachusetts

Air Force Tasks P-7621 and P66220

Naval Ship Systems Command, Washington, D. C.

Contract NObsr-95251, Task II

Project Serial No. SF0180201, Task 538

Approved:

Seibert Q. Duntley, Director Visibility Laboratory

Approved for Distribution:

hilL^ Q ^JL^ William A. Nierenberg, Director Scripps Institution of Oceanography

Page 2: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

SIORef. 68-18 SIORef. 68-19

July 1968 July 1968

ERRATA - SEPTEMBER 1968

The following corrections apply to SIO Ref. 68-18, ATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS in the

Vicinity of Crater Lake, Oregon, Part I, and SIO Ref. 68-19, ATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS in

the Vicinity of Crater Lake, Oregon, Part II .

SIO Ref. 68-18, Part I

Page Location Reads

17 Figure 14 0.001 (Replace reflectance scale 0.010 magnitude values)

18 Figure 15 - Replace entire page

Should Read

0.010 0.100

20

23

24

Abstract, lines 2 and 3, second sentence

The Flight, last sentence, paragraph 2

Figure 3 Caption, lines 3, 4, and 5

Figure 6 (Replace horizontal path function scale magnitude values in both graphs)

DD Form 1473, Abstract, lines 2 and 3 second sentence

SIORef. 6 8-19, Part II

Three of the descents were before local apparent noon, the fourth descent was after local apparent noon.

Local apparent noon occurred between the third and fourth descents, at approximately 1215.

Al l descents were before local apparent noon. Simultaneous . . .

Local apparent noon oc­curred at approximately 1315.

Delete the last sentence on this Figure Caption.

150 150

Figure 17 0.001 (Replace reflectance scale 0.010 magnitude values in both graphs) 0.001

0.010

Figure 20 (Replace entire page)

Figure 21 (Replace entire page)

500 500

0.010 0.100

0.010 0.100

Three of the descents were before local apparent noon; the fourth descent was after local apparent noon.

Al l descents were before local apparent noon. Simultaneous . . .

Page 3: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

E

a 3

10

0.01

SECOND DESCENT

FIRST DESCENT

.J I i i i i

0.10

REFLECTANCE

Fig. 14. Ratios of upwelling and downwelling il luminances during both d e s c e n t s .

17

Page 4: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20

SOLAR ZENITH ANGLE (°)

Fig. 15. Beam transmittances for vertical path of sight as a function of solar zenith angle. The four data points represent t ransmit tances calculated from the ground-based transmissometer. The two elongated data points represent the t ransmit tances calculated from aircraft data , extrapolated to ground level , the amount of elongation representing the change of solar zenith angle during the time of each descent .

Page 5: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

o O

O o CM

90 80 70 60 50 40 30

SOLAR ZENITH ANGLE (°)

20 10

Fig. 20. Beam transmittance for the vertical path of sight as a function of the solar zenith angle. The data shown by filled circles were calculated from ground-based data and the equation

cos 6. ^ ( 2 0 7 0 , 0 ° , 0°)

^ ( 2 0 7 0 , eB,^>s)

The data shown by elongated data points were from extrapolated aircraft data and the equation

^ ( 2 0 7 0 , 0°,0°) =exp [ - S A z / L ( z ) ] .

During the forenoon the beam transmittance for the vertical path of sight decreased as the solar zenith angle decreased. At 1315 (local apparent noon) the solar zenith angle was 25.75°.

23

Page 6: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

90 80 70 60 50 40 30

SOLAR ZENITH ANGLE (°)

20 10

Fig. 21. Downwelhng illuminance E(2070, -) as a function of solar zenith angle. The data indicated by the filled circles are those recorded by ground based irradiometer, the elongated data points are from extrapolated aircraft irradiometer data, and the open box D from spectroradiometric data weighted by the luminance efficiency function, recorded at the surface of Crater Lake. The ground station location was at an altitude of 2070m. The surface of Crater Lake is at an altitude of 2020 m.

24

Page 7: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

ATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS

IN THE VICINITY OF CRATER LAKE, OREGON

Part 2

Almerian R. Boileau

ABSTRACT

This report, Part I I , presents additional atmospheric optical data, comparable to the data presented

in Part I, but for a different type of day, and for four descents instead of two. Three of the descents

were before local apparent noon; the fourth descent was after local apparent noon. Simultaneous spec­

tral irradiance data were recorded at the surface of Crater Lake. Data presented are altitude profiles of

heading of aircraft, temperature, relative humidity, equilibrium luminance, horizontal path function, at­

tenuation length, nadir luminance, upwelling and downwelling illuminances and their ratios, reflectance

calculated from nadir luminance, atmospheric beam transmittances for vertical path of sight as a func­

tion of solar zenith angle, and downwelling illuminance as a function of solar zenith angle.

INTRODUCTION

This report presents atmospheric optical and meteorological data recorded in the vicinity of Crater

Lake, Oregon, on the third day of a three day period, 2-4 August 1966. On this day data were recorded

nearly simultaneously (1) in an Air Force C-130 aircraft flying over Crater Lake, (2) at a ground station

set up on the southern slope of Mt. Mazama, in the caldera of which Crater Lake is located, and (3) on

the surface of Crater Lake itself.x 2 The data reported herein are of the same type as reported in Part I

of this report and as published in a series of journal papers.3 - 7

This report is the final report under U. S. Navy Ship Systems Command Contract NObsr-95251,

Task I I .

Work in this same general area is being continued under Air Force Contract No. F19628-67-C-0181.

1

Page 8: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

THE FLIGHT

The instrumented aircraft. Air Force C-130, No. 022, took off from Kingsley Field, Klamath Falls,

Oregon, at 0833 and arrived over Crater Lake at 0910. At the time of takeoff the sky was clear of

clouds. The dry air temperature was 20°C, the atmospheric pressure was 879 mb, and the relative

humidity was 60%.

Four level-attitude data gathering descents were made, alternately in northerly and southerly direc­

tions. The first descent was started from south of Crater Lake, from an altitude of 8000 m, at 0923, and

ended north of the lake, at an altitude of 2700 m, at 0937. The second descent was a southerly descent

from 8000 m, at 1025, to 1400 m, at 1046. Between these two descents, at about 0940, clouds were

forming near the 2800 m altitude. The third and fourth descents were northward from 8000 m, at 1145, to

2200 m, at 1202, and southward from 8800 m, at 1254, to 2500 m, at 1313. Local apparent noon occurred

between the third and fourth descents, at approximately 1215.

During the time that data were being recorded in the C-130 aircraft, atmospheric optical data were

also being recorded at the ground station, and spectroradiometric data were being recorded at the sur­

face of Crater Lake.

DATA

The magnetic heading of the aircraft during the four descents is shown in Fig. 1. The altitude pro­

fi les of dry air temperature and relative humidity are shown in Figs. 2 and 3. The altitude of the aircraft,

plotted as a function of elapsed time, for each of the four descents, is shown in Fig. 4.

Atmospheric optical data profiles are shown in Figs. 5 through 21. Fig. 5 shows the four equilibrium

luminance profiles in two groupings, the profiles for the two northerly descents being shown in the left

side of the figure, the profiles for the two southerly descents being shown on the right. The four hori­

zontal path function profiles are presented in Fig. 6. These are grouped in the same manner as the

equilibrium luminance profiles in Fig. 5, that is, the profiles for the northerly descent are shown on the

left, profiles for the southerly descent are shown on the right. Figs. 7 through 10 show the profiles of

attenuation length and equivalent attenuation length for the four descents.

The nadir luminances for the four descents are shown in Figs. 11 through 14. There is very l i t t le

similarity in these four profiles. This, of course, is because a terrain of varying texture and reflectance

was being seen by a telephotometer having a 5°circular f ie ld. The one thing common to the four profiles

is the distinct change of nadir luminance as the aircraft passed over Crater Lake. There was no observ­

able sun glitter, observable, that is, by the nadir telephotometer, on the surface of the lake during the

f irst two descents. Glitter was observed during the third and fourth descents.

Fig. 15 shows the downwelling and upwelling illuminances for the first and third descents. Fig. 16

shows the same quantities for the second and fourth descents. The increase in downwelling illuminance

with increase in solar zenith angle is greater than the cosine effect of the flat plate collector. This

fact, coupled with reduction of beam transmittance, for the vertical path of sight with decrease of solar

zenith angle (see Fig. 20), is interpreted as showing that there was an increase in atmospheric scattering.

Pacific Daylight Time is used throughout this report.

2

Page 9: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

with a consequent increase in the zenith and near zenith sky luminance values. These sky luminances

being near the zenith, cause a larger increase in the value of illuminance on a horizontal f lat plate col­

lector than the effect due to the cosine of the change in zenith angle.

The profiles of reflectance, ratios of upwelling to downwelling illuminances, are shown in Fig. 17.

These have been grouped by the direction of the descent, the profile of the northerly descents being on

the left and the profiles of the southerly descent being on the right. For comparison, reflectance profiles

calculated from nadir luminance and downwelling illuminance are presented in Figs. 18 and 19. These

profiles also are grouped by direction of the descents. Also, these profiles, resulting from data mea­

sured with a telephotometer having a 5° f ield, have much more structure than the ratio of illuminance

profiles.

Fig. 20 is a plot of beam transmittances for the vertical path of sight, from 2070 m to space, as a

function of the solar zenith angle.

Fig. 21 is a plot of the various values of downwelling illuminance at the 2070 m level as the solar

zenith angle changes. These data were obtained from three sources: ground-based irradiometer mea­

surements, extrapolated airborne irradiometer measurements, and calculations based on the spectro­

radiometric data measured at the surface of the lake.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Visibi l i ty Laboratory personnel during this field trip were: R. W. Johnson, Senior Development

Engineer, supervising personnel of the Atmospheric Research Branch; G. C. Barnett, Assistant Develop­

ment Engineer, responsible for the airborne activities; K. W. McMasters, Senior Electronics Technician,

and R. L. Sydnor, Senior Laboratory Mechanician, assisting Mr. Barnett in the aircraft; and G. F. Simas,

Senior Electronics Technician, assisting Mr. Johnson at the ground station; R. C. Smith, Assistant Re­

search Physicist, of the Underwater Optical Research Group, operating the spectroradiometer at the

surface of Crater Lake; and J. J. Lones, Associate Development Engineer, Engineering Branch, assisting

Dr. Smith.

The crew of the C-130 aircraft consisted of Capt. Paul Griswold, USAF, Aircraft Commander; 1st

Lieut. Roger Lowther, USAF, pilot; Sgt. Castro, crew chief, and Airman LaRossa. Their fullest coopera­

tion in flying the aircraft in the requested fl ight pattern was much appreciated.

Many members of the Crater Lake Park staff assisted in this field trip, and their assistance is grate­

fully acknowledged. Ranger John Chapman was especially helpful in assisting Mr. Johnson in his

selection of a site for the ground station.

REFERENCES

1. R. C. Smith and J. E. Tyler, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 589 (1967).

2. J. E. Tyler and R. C. Smith, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 595 (1967).

3. S. Q. Duntley, et al, Appl. Opt. 3, 549 (1964).

4. J. I. Gordon and P. V. Church, Appl. Opt. 5, 793 (1966).

5. A. R. Boileau and J. I. Gordon, Appl. Opt. 5, 803 (1966).

6. J. I. Gordon and P. V. Church, Appl. Opt. 5, 919 (1966).

7. A. R. Boileau, Appl. Opt. 7, 407 (1968).

3

Page 10: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

10

7 V

E

3 r

3 -

FOURTH DESCENT

SECOND DESCENT

I

I /

\

\

I \

> i

FIRST DESCENT

THIRD DESCENT

_L

0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360

MAGNETIC HEADING (°)

Fig. 1. Aircraft heading, magnetic, during descen t s . True heading is magnetic heading plus 20°. The change of heading at 6200 m during second descent was made in order to cross the center of Crater Lake; the change at 4900 m was made in order to resume original heading. During the third descent it became necessa ry to change aircraft heading at 3400 m to avoid clouds.

4

Page 11: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

10

E

Q 3

FOURTH DESCENT

FIRST DESCENT

THIRD DESCENT

SECOND DESCENT \

50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0

TEMPERATURE (C)

10 20

Fig. 2. Altitude profiles of dry air temperature. Only minor changes in these profiles, which are of little significance, occurred during the nearly four hours elapsed time be­tween the start of the first descent and the termination of the fourth descent .

Page 12: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

10

E

FIRST DESCENT

THIRD DESCENT

FOURTH DESCENT ^ \ . .

I SECOND DESCENT'

J I I I I I I I L

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%)

Fig. 3. Altitude profiles of relative humidity. These profiles show no change in relative humidity during the time of the four descents except for the stratum between 3250 m and 2250 m. The relat ive humid­ity in this stratum has i t s greatest measured value at about 1200, before local apparent noon (1215), and then has a lesser value by 1300.

6

Page 13: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

10

FOURTH DESCENT

SECOND DESCENT

THIRD DESCENT

FIRST DESCENT

l ' i I I l_ l I I I I I I I L_J L

5 10 15

ELAPSED TIME (MINUTES)

18

Fig. 4. Aircraft altitude as a function of time during the four de­scents. Changes in the attitude of the aircraft during descent can be inferred from these plots. It appears that the attitude of the aircraft remained virtually unchanged once a descent was started.

Page 14: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

10

9 -

6 -

5 -

4 -

2 -

1 -

-

-

* • • • • « ,

- i ~

t A *

-

%

- •r FIRST DESCENT >

- THIRD DESCENT

' i 1 i i I i

*:*

FOURTH DESCENT

SECOND DESCENT

J_ J ' • ' '

1000 10000 1000

EQUILIBRIUM LUMINANCE (cd m"2)

10000

Fig. 5. Profiles of equilibrium luminance B q (z , 90°, c/>). The va lues of <f> for the four descents were 133°, 46°, 148°, and 22°. The random fluctuations with altitude are be­lieved to be spurious with the true equilibrium luminance profiles being approximated by the envelopes of the maximum values . There seems to be no discernible change due to the various values of </>.

Page 15: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

10

8 -

7 -

6 -

5 -

4 -

3 -

2 -

1 -

X THIRD DESCENT

' - • • : = • •

:-.2. vf."

FIRST DESCENT

I I I I _l L

FOURTH DESCENT

SECOND DESCENT

I I I I -I L

50 100 150 50 100

HORIZONTAL PATH FUNCTION (cd m~2 km"1)

150

Fig. 6. Profiles of horizontal path function B*(z, 90°,<£). The four values of cj> for the four descen ts are the same as l is ted for B q (z , 90°,<£), Fig. 5. The large change in the value of B*(z,90°,<fi) at 3250 m during the third descent i s attributed to the relat ively large increase of relative humidity measured at that altitude during the same descen t .

9

Page 16: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

10

E

3

FIRST DESCENT

-I 1 I I i i i i -I ' ' I I I I

10

ATTENUATION LENGTH (km)

100

Fig. 7. Profiles of attenuation length L(z) and equivalent attenuation length L(z) for the first descent. The random fluctuations in the L(z) profile are primarily due to similar fluctuations of the equilibrium luminance profile.

10

Page 17: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

10

E

Q 3

SECOND DESCENT

.J I I I ' ' ' ' J I L I I I I

10

ATTENUATION LENGTH (km)

100

Fig. 8. Profile of L(z) and L(z) for the second descent. This profile and the profile of horizontal path function in Fig. 6 show an increase in attenuation in the strata at 3600 m and below.

11

Page 18: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

10

E

Q

THIRD DESCENT

5 "

_l I L I I I I I I • ' I I I I I I

10

ATTENUATION LENGTH (km)

100

Fig. 9. The third descent profiles for L(z) and L(z). A comparison of this profile with that in Fig. 8 shows that the attenuation in the lower altitudes had continued to increase with elapsed time.

12

Page 19: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

10

3 -

2 -

FOURTH DESCENT

J L I • • • • I -I I I ' ' ' '

10

ATTENUATION LENGTH (km)

100

Fig. 10. Attenuation length profiles for fourth descent. The L(z) profile and the L(z) profile for the third descent appear to be quite similar, but the transmittance cal­culated from these profiles (see Fig. 20) show that the transmittance for the vertical path of sight during the fourth descent was higher than the transmittance during the third descent.

Page 20: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

FIRST DESCENT

J I I I I I I J I I • • • '

100 1000

NADIR LUMINANCE (cd m"2)

10000

Fig. 11. Nadir luminance Br(z, 180°, <£) during first descent. The apparent luminance of Crater Lake during the four descents is that between the arrows in Figs. 11- 14.

14

Page 21: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

E

Q

100 1000

NADIR LUMINANCE (cd m"2) 10000

Fig. 12. Nadir luminance during second descent.

15

Page 22: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

10

E

Q 3

THIRD DESCENT

2 -

100

_l L I I I ' • • I I I I I

1000

NADIR LUMINANCE (cd m"2)

10000

Fig. 13. Nadir luminance during third descent.

16

Page 23: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

E

Q 3

100 1000

NADIR LUMINANCE (cd m"2)

10000

Fig. 14. Nadir luminance during fourth descent.

17

Page 24: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

10

E

3 5

2 - UPWELLING DOWNWELLING

I • . • • ! I i i i i

1000 10000

ILLUMINANCE (lu m"2)

100000

Fig. 15. Downwelling and upwelling illuminances, E(z , - ) and E(z,+) respectively, during first and third descents. The solid line profiles are for the first descent, the bi }ken line profiles are for the third descent.

18

Page 25: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

10

Q 3

, - >

I UPWELLING

0

1000

I • • • • I x

DOWNWELLING

' ' ' '

10000

ILLUMINANCE (lu m"2)

100000

Fig. 16. Downwelling and upwelling illuminances for second and fourth descents. The solid line profiles are for the second descent, the broken line profiles are for the fourth descent.

19

Page 26: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

10

E

Q 3

3 -FIRST DESCENT

THIRD DESCENT

' ' ' '

FOURTH DESCENT ».

SECOND DESCENT

I I I I

0.001 0.010 0.001

REFLECTANCE

0.010

Fig. 17. Profiles of ratios of upwelling and downwelling illuminances during first and third descents and during second and fourth descents. These reflectances are found by the equation

Rr(z, 180°,<£) = E ( z , + ) / E ( z , - )

20

Page 27: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

10

E

Q 3

2 -

1 -

.01

FIRST DESCENT

*.:*• THIRD DESCENT

J I I I L • • ' J I I I • • • '

.1

R(z,0°) = ;rB(z,180o)/E(z,-)

1.0

Fig. 18. Profiles of terrain reflectance for first and third descents calculated from nadir luminances and downwelling illuminances by the equation

Rr(z, 180°,<£) = 7rBr(z, 18O°,0) /E(z , - )

21

Page 28: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

10

5 -

: : : : « • •

«r SECOND DESCENT •c*'*

" " " " • " • " • • • • " • • • _ . « • • • . . . . . . . . . • • • • " • • • " * "

. I " : " " : i s i t i " " " -

! > • FOURTH DESCENT

J L I . ' ' ' I ' I I L

.01 .1

R(z,0°) = rrB(z,180°)/E(z,-)

1.0

Fig. 19. Profiles of terrain reflectance for second and fourth descents calculated in the same manner as the profile in Fig. 18.

22

Page 29: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

90 80 70 60 50 40 30

SOLAR ZENITH ANGLE (°)

20 10

Fig. 20. Beam transmittance for the vertical path of sight as a function of the solar zenith angle. The data shown by filled circles were calculated from ground-based data and the equation

T ^ 2070,0°, 0°) ,Bo„<2070,(9„^.)

»B„

The data shown by vertical crosses and the x were from extrapolated aircraft data and the equation

Too(2070,0°,0°) = e x p [ - 2 A z / L ( z ) ] .

The vertical crosses represent forenoon transmittance values, the cross represents the afternoon transmittance value. Note that during the forenoon the beam transmittance for the vertical path of sight decreased as the solar zenith angle decreased and in the after­noon, for the one data point, increased as the solar zenith angle increased. At 1215 (local apparent noon) the solar zenith angle was 25.75°. The lowest transmittance value obtained was that calculated from aircraft data recorded during the third descent, from 1145 to 1202, with an approximate solar zenith angle of 26.2°.

23

Page 30: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

90 80 60 50 40 30 SOLAR ZENITH ANGLE (°)

20 10

Fig . 21 . Downwelling illuminance E(2070 , - ) as a function of solar zenith angle. The da ta indicated by the filled circles i s that recorded by ground-based irradiometer, the vert ical c rosses + by extrapolated aircraft irradiometer data recorded during forenoon, the diagonal cross x by aircraft irradiometer data recorded during afternoon, and the open box D from spectroradiometric data weighted by the luminance efficiency function, recorded at the surface of Crater Lake. The ground station location was at an alt i tude of 2070 m. The surface of Crater Lake is at an altitude of 2020 m.

Page 31: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

UNCLASSIFIED Security Classification

DOCUMENT CONTROL DATA - R&D (Security olaeelltcatlon of rjfltt. body ot abstract and indexing annotation must be entered when the overall report le eteaaitied)

I . ORIGINATING ACTIVITY (Corporate author)

Visibility Laboratory University of California San Diego, California 92152

2e REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

UNCLASSIFIED 26 GROUP

3. REPORT TITLE

ATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF CRATER LAKE, OREGON. PART I I .

4. DESCRIPTIVE NOTES (Type of report and Inclusive datee)

Final Report 5. AUTHORfSJ (Laat noma. IIrat name. Initial)

Boileau, Almerian R.

S. REPORT DATE

June 1968 7« TOTAL NO. Of PAOCI

27 7b. NO. OF REPS

7 8a. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO.

NObsr-95251 6. PROJECT NO.

SF0180301, Task 538 C.

Task II

9«. ORIGINATOR'S REPORT NUMBBRfS.)

SIO Ref. 68-19

9o. OTHER REPORT NOfS.) (Any other number* that may be aaalanad thie report)

10 A VA IL ABILITY/LIMITATION NOTICES

Distribution of this document is unlimited.

I I . SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

13. ABSTRACT

12. SPONSORING MILITARY ACTIVITY

Naval Ship Systems Command Department of the Navy Washington, D. C. 20360

Air Force Cambridge Research Center Lawrence G. Hanscom Field Bedford, Massachusetts 01731

This report, Part I I , presents additional atmospheric optical data, comparable to the data presented in Part I, but for a different type of day, and for four descents instead of two. Three of the descents were before local apparent noon; the fourth descent was after local apparent noon. Simultaneous spec­tral irradiance data were recorded at the surface of Crater Lake. Data presented are altitude profiles of heading of aircraft, temperature, relative humidity, equilibrium luminance, horizontal path function, attenuation length, nadir luminance, upwelling and downwelling illuminances and their ratios, reflec­tance calculated from nadir luminance, atmospheric beam transmittances for vertical path of sight as a function of solar zenith angle, and downwelling illuminance as a function of solar zenith angle.

DD FORM .1473 UNCLASSIFIED Security Classification

Page 32: 1968: Atmospheric optical measurements in the …misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/education/VisibilityLab/reports/SIO_68-19.pdfATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF ... ATMOSPHERIC

UNCLASSIFIED Security Classi f icat ion

K EV WORDS

Atmospheric Optics

Illuminance

Transmittance

L I N K A

UNCLASSIFIED Security Classification