19480525_minutes.pdf
TRANSCRIPT
Minutes of actions taken by the B
'8.1 Reserve System on Tuesday, May 25,
thett.'ard Room at 10:30 a.m.
PREsENT: Mr. McCabe, ChairmanMr. EcclesMr. SzymczakMr. DraperMr. EvansMr. VardamanMr. Clayton
ard of Governors of the
1948. The Board met in
834
Mr. Carpenter, SecretaryMr. Sherman, Assistant SecretaryMr. Morrill, Special AdviserMr. Thurston, Assistant to the BoardMr. Riefler, Assistant to the ChairmanMr. Smead, Director of the Division of
Bank OperationsMr. Bethea, Director of the Division of
Administrative ServicesMr. Thomas, Director of the Division of
Research and StatisticsMr. Vest, General CounselMr. Nelson, Director of the Division of
Personnel AdministrationMr. Townsend, Associate General CounselMr. Millard, Assistant Director of the
Division of Examinations
1,4 la ecordance with the decision reached at the meeting of the
°7:111417 142 19481 there was a further discussion at this meeting
°t'qi°11 bY the
14441'1N 1%cNitrements
Board to in re by 2 percentage points the re-
of member banks in the central reserve cities of, elrld
Chicago. The discussion was in the light of the exist-
l'141erlre situation of banks in these cities and whether action
11141 takell now in anticipation of renewed inflationary tendencies,
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5/25/48-2-
14Q4,44...g'a increased lending by member banks, or whether action shouldbe d,/erred until there was a more definite upward trend in the
of credit when action might be
441ereiag the
After a comment by Mr. Thomas that41441
reserve city banks had not changed114
discussed by the Board on May 14,4111ed to give 30
movement.
days notice44110
should not be madetclr the
reason that theItttter partof June.
r4i1it5te adjustment
14414eount8 during theNEtelktY
t4 refunding
804rdi a action.
0, Mr. Szymczak
ktt104
'iglat h.-- more effective if only short notice were given.
111'• McCabe stated that when he and Mr. Sproul were at thekirY on I,
Ttke '18-Y 12 for their discussion with representatives of the
tc4,,,41 11rYh respect to an increase in the short-term rate, he in-
, the
'reltallrY that the Board felt strongly that there shouldh r
more effective in retarding
the reserve position of
greatly since the matter
he stated that, if the Board
of an increase in requirements, the
effective until after the first of July
market
He
to
would be under pressure during the
also said that in July the Treasury could
the increase by reducing its calls on war
period of adjustment. He added that the
operations should be taken into account in timing
inquired whether four weeks public notice of a3,4 r
eserve requirements was necessary and suggested that the
iacrease in reserve requirements and that action on
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
83 6
_3_
taken shortly after the Treasury announcement
of
title, there was increasing evidenceeholo
in the early part of June
4 1.fa48°48 that the reserve position14t
5i5/48
ttl° Matter might be
/tt.411 respect to the June refunding was made.
€estto a request for his comment, Mr. Riefler sug-
d that the time to take the action was when the money market
'ed to be getting out of hand, at which time action would bekeit tor
9 effective than if taken earlier. He questioned the need
the g much notice before the effective date of the action for
48:8°Ia that the increase would affect only the banks in central
to cities which would not need a great deal of time
Just their positions to the higher requirements.
With further1148
CliBellssion of
4tikclille and
reference
the
in which
to the timing of the action there
possible effect of action in June on the
a to whether it would be preferable to make
t4"tectilre date of the action some time in the latter part of
s
'Ilki (11' eatlY August. It was suggested in this connection that,
14.1:7 "4°4 la June would result in increased purchases of certi-t'ktse by. the Federal Reserve144Nt
takitttr g the action immediately. Mr. Eccles suggested that the
In. response
Banks, this effect on the securities
l'i°41c1 result from the action regardless of when it was taken.The A
,Liscussion indicated that a majority of the Board would
°ate fthe action should be°II the
banks would be easy
that an inflationary
egain taking hold in the country and action would
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
8375/25/48
-4 -
allindication that the Board of Governors was using such powers
48ithad to meet the situation, and if it were made effective at4 date
in June it might interfere with the July financing.
Ittle action were not made effective during the early part of June,
46414; the effective date would have to be deferred until the lat-t'laalt of July or the early part of August. He felt that the
414° rell5(31as that justified a recommendation that the short-terml'atebe in
creased applied to an increase in reserve requirements4cIlle
stated that he would favor such action.
SzYmczak stated that there was no increase in lending in
414 Chicago by member banks at this time, but on the con -trttry
4 'a decrease, that if action were made effective before July 1
4116t be laterpreted as an effort in the direction of trying to,t:11‘ecil
tacrease in the44,14
N P°88ible to get legislation at this session of the Congresst the
Board additional credit powers, he felt it would be de-
ec/r the Board to use its existing powers at a time when its
1"i°t1 lq°111d have the greatest possible effect later in the yearth e was
Pe eti,, an indication that member bank lending was increasing.11'4 4Ction.
IN the at that time, he said, he would continue negotiations
ktilt Ill'elIsurY for an increase in the short-term rate, having in
°Dfill 1)°5sibility of increasing the rate by operations in the
11141141t before the next refunding operation is undertaken.
ha 'ence was also made to the fact that those who were op-
cliti°11a1 credit powers for the System had stated repeatedly
short-term rate and that, since it would
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
8%8,
taklber
5/25/48
-5 -
thel'e was no need for such powers because the Board had not used
ite powers.
After a further discussion of thepossible effects of the action, Mr.Eccles moved that action be taken bythe Board to increase reserve require-ments of central reserve city banks by2 percentage points with the under-standing that the action would be an-nounced immediately to become effectiveon Friday, June 11, 1948.
Chairman McCabe stated that before action was taken he wouldet.,0
halie the latest information as to the reserve position of
batiks in NewYork and Chicago and how the increase would af-etthose
banks.
tit)I Atter some further discussion, Mr. Eccles withdrew his motionthe
understanding that there would be a further discussion of44j4t tter
11()41tri es the first item for consideration at a meeting of theto
be held tomorrow morning at 10:00 a.m.
Ther
read,_4-4g as follows:
the:The Personnel Committee recommends that Section 4 ofbe ern°4rOs travel regulations as amended November 7, 1947,Ilci -nc,led to provide an increase in the allowance for of-Dertt-l'iravel in a person's own automobile from 5O to 6 1/4
an and the elimination of the provision which now re-teed 8 this
the allowance in the case of employees not to ex-ahort cost of transportation by common carrier over thef!lile reniusually traveled route between the points of travel.B--4tion in this respect would then read: When using
automobile in official travel, the traveler may be:414 ,-4mileage at a rate not to exceed 6 1/4 per mile in
lettitti operating expenses except that reimbursement
0111°13ile travel in accordance with the provisions of'lq —l'agl'aPh by others than those excepted from the pro-of‘lettn 4 Paragraph 8 of these regulations shall be sub-he approval of the Personnel Committee.'
e was then presented a memorandum from the Personnel Corn-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
839
-6--_
‘j°11111 .tr,. "The Government travel regulations allow 50 per milef."' official travel and the Board's regulation has con-
ed80111 in this respect except for a short period fromePtember, 1946, to March 21, 1947, when the allowance
1/4 per mile.re "A survey of the Federal Reserve Banks sometime ago,vealed the following allowance for official travel inverson s own car:
7 Banks 70 per mile3 Banks 60 per mile1 Bank 50 per mile1 Bank 60 - 70 - 80 per mile
(Atlanta) (depending on cost of car)recent report published by the American Automobile
10 Lciation shows that for a small post-war car driven3 i;ui miles the allowance for operating cost should beclar::w per mile plus $1.30 per day and that when insurance,alVeiation, and license fee are included, the allowancePIN's be 8 1/40 per mile. A similar computation for a
-Zr oar gives a mileage cost of just over 70 per mile.orl, Colonel Press in the office of the Washington BoardPerarade says that the present allowance for the use of a
°Ille own car by local firms is 70 to 80 per mile."
Upon motion by Mr. Eccles, therecommendation of the Personnel Com-mittee was approved unanimously.
Co'e of the agenda for the forthcoming Conference of Chair-
" th e Federal Reserve Banks at White Sulphur Springs, West
44442 nthq -14114Y 29-31, 1948, were distributed. Mr. Evans stated
fale a.gerlda had been prepared in accordance with the wishes of'4ellt, a' OOThThjj0 of the Conference and that it was his recom-k,440„.
th.
4 that „_
10044re 'due Board authorize the payment of the expenses of
444 4Ce uhich would not be covered by the travel and subsis-N)erisk.
of the individuals attending the Conference.
Mr. Evans' recommendation wasapproved unanimously.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
840
5/25/48
_7_
Reference was made to the discussion at the joint meeting
the l,-Qard of Governors and the Presidents of the Federal Reserveatt41C nh
, 8 -'4PlaY 21 of the desirability of a reduction in the portion of
4,an interest charge on outstanding Federal Reserve notes
44
eteallaings of the Federal Reserve Banks being paid to the
to the further action to be taken by the Board in connection
/rithe tatter.
It was unanimously agreed that thestaff should prepare, and send to eachmember of the Board for his comment, adraft of a memorandum setting forththe reasons for and against such a re-duction, it being understood that afterthe members of the Board had had an op-portunity to comment on the memorandumit would be revised and placed an thedocket for consideration at a meeting.
was
4tika. 4
(148tim.,
t6 -4
*vhether a proceeding' Dr vi
-aictis of the Clayton-4(I ths.
Mt' ClaYton stated that Mr. Townsend had completed his in-
ready to report to the Board with respect to the
should be instituted by the Board under
Act against Transamerica Corporation
the (Mr. Clayton) would suggest that the Board hear Mr.
t4a 114113 statement at the meeting of the Board tomorrow following
1:4"cleration of,1 La an increase in reserve requirements of member
central reserve cities.
Following a discussion of the na-ture of the proceeding and the pro-cedure that might be followed inconnection therewith, Mr. Clayton'ssuggestion was approved unanimously.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
841
of the respective Banks for the year beginning June 1,
ellci upon motion by Mr. Draper the following actions were taken
J Name0. s. veytonstet poweUira(1)1:PUree1
santonclA. McConnell4. T4 MiliS
1.0 Zieter
C
44 B. oreLarson
E. LarsonPeterson.
Z,4 Turner0. 14.4' LYsert
0 1stad1,1.4. McCrackenStrouraan,
C, 4% TowleLareon
5/25/48
-8-
At this point all of the members of the staff withdrew from
thelecting except Mr. Carpenter.
Consideration was then given to the salaries submitted bythe
el'al Reserve Banks of Atlanta, Minneapolis, and Dallas forOfficers
1(48,
—4ms vote:
1. A letter to Mr. Peyton, Presi-dent of the Federal Reserve Bank ofMinneapolis, was approved unanimouslyas follows:
ri,s _4
The Board of Governors approves the payment of sala-c to the following officers of the Federal Reserve BankthroLAIleaPolis and its Branch for the period June 1, 1948the-Z12L May 31, 1949, at the rates indicated, which areyollr't418 fixed by the Board of Directors as reported in
letter of April 22 1948:
Jr.
TitlePresidentFirst Vice PresidentVice President and CounselVice PresidentVice PresidentVice President andVice President andSecretary
Personnel OfficerAssistant Vice PresidentAssistant CashierAssistant CashierAssistant CashierOperating Research OfficerAuditorDirector of ResearchAssistant Counsel
HELENA BRANCH Vice PresidentAssistant Cashier
Cashier
Annual Salary$25,00018,00013,00012,00011,00011,000
9,75010,0009,0008,0007,0005,7507,0007,5008,0007,000
10,0006,500"
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5/25/48
2. After a discussion of questionsraised by Mr. Vardaman with regard tothe quality of the work being done byr,essrs. McLarin and Clark as Presidentand First Vice President, respectively,of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta(during which Messrs. Smead, Nelson,and Millard were called back into themeeting), it was agreed that on thebasis of the information available tothe Board it should not approve the in-crease of $1,000 proposed by the Di-rectors of the Atlanta Bank for FirstVice President Clark.
3. The following letter to Mr.McLarin, President of the Federal Re-serve Bank of Atlanta, was approved:
ri "The Board of Governors approves the payment of sala-„e: to the following officers of the Federal Reserve Bank19zPantP for the period June 1, 1948, through May 31,1T3,V, 4't the rates indicated, which are the rates fixedtia ''e Board of Directors as reported in your letter of
5r 14,1948:
v. x.41, s ligL.Lie
McLarin, Jr.S. 1,' BowmanJ. ,.
SchuesslerDeamark
0.118H. BowdeneamPliartinMartin
F..41/41, McCravey, Jr.4riedi0arr Raineyili:114310;.e.al :lt
14°1(1 T General• PattersonP. L.
4. 0T.
Beavers4 * "azerI, reo w.1.1
quhartCashierStarr
Title Annual SalaryPresidentVice PresidentVice PresidentVice PresidentAssistant Vice PresidentAssistant Vice PresidentAssistant Vice PresidentAssistant Vice PresidentAssistant Vice PresidentAssistant Vice PresidentDirector of Research
AuditorGeneral Counsel
Birmingham Branch
$25,00011,0009,0009,0007,5007,5006,0005,5007,5006,0009,0008,0009,000
9,5007,0006,5005,500
Vice President and ManagerAssistant Manager
Assistant Cashier
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5/25/48
'...Lame
Tn• A. Lanford`1:11"alford Clarkjas°11 C. Ford
l'IY1Y Snyder
B. Fort, Jr.liarrisonRobert E.
TvkgYiy, Jr.
-10-
TitleJacksonville BranchVice President and ManagerCashierAssistant CashierAssistant CashierNashville BranchVice President and ManagerCashierAssistant Cashier
Annual Salary
E. p New Orleans Branch' raris
;31g614 L. Shaw Vice President and ManagerAssistant Manager
41,1,1' Sewell CashierT. Chapman Assistant Cashier
• Vasterling Assistant CashierThe Board also approves the payment of salary to Mr.
1,471,L Milling for the period June 1, 1948, through May 31,at the rate of $5,500 per annum as an officer of thewith the title of Assistant Vice President.
ereti "The Board has given careful consideration to the in-Vice"! in salary recommended for Mr. L. M. Clark as Firsterea 'resident and has come to the conclusion tht,t the in-13140 should not be approved at this time. However, the4e.,rk °f Governors approves the payment of salary to Mr.IlYth:1 his present rate of 416,000 per annum, if fixedJlatLe ; 4Joard of Directors at this rate, for the period
1948 through May 31, 1949."
$10,0007,0005,0006,000
8,5006,5006,000
13,5008,0006,6005,4005,100
4. Chairman McCabe was requestedat a convenient time to talk with Mr.Neely, Chairman of the Federal ReserveBank of Atlanta, about the questionwhether Messrs. McLarin and Clark shouldbe reappointed as President and FirstVice President, respectively, at theend of their present terms.
5. After a discussion of questionsraised by Mr. Vardaman with respect tothe quality of the work being performedby Messrs. Gentry and Novey, First VicePresident and Auditor, respectively, ofthe Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, thefollowing letter to Mr. Gilbert, Presi-dent of the Federal Reserve Bank of
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
844
5h5/48
-11-
Dallas, was approved with the under-standing that at his convenienceChairman McCabe would talk with Mr.Parten about the quality of the ser-vices of Mr. Novey as Auditor;
"The Board of Governors approves the payment of sala-11:8 t.„ 0 the following officers of the Federal Reserve Bank°ti:aruallas and its Branches for the period June 1, 1948the°11gh May 31, 1949, at the rates indicated, which are
.,,,, rates fixed by the Board of Directors as reported in11r
letter of May 14, 1948:Name
v. ,I.Title Annual Salary
Gilbert President $25,000It. ,.-------
IL ;).• Gentry First Vice President 17,000'4E Cole . b. man Vice President 14,000
L. 4,118tin. II: rondrom Vice PresidentVice President and Cashier
11,000411,000
Delyross Vice President 11,000me. • Ironsmoe C, yth Vice President 11,000
rga4 H. Rice Vice President 8,400Assistant Vice President and
B, 0 Secretary of the Board 9,000
J• L. Webb Assistant Cashier
Ro%rarta• C°°k
7,200Assistant Cashier 7,500
A. rj" Carrithers 7,000kd. 1,(4 Assistant Cashier14. D ,Lchaelis Assistant Cashier 6,800P. T' Waller Assistant Cashier 6,800"
NailerGeneral Auditor11.u.8,000
Houston Branch4.,;,t Holloway Vice President 10,000B. '1' Davis"Ts Troy
Cashier 6,300Assistant Cashier 5,500
1'11E. b_ San Antonio BranchAtYr lgle Vice President 9,000. ceci,,-* Mundt Cashier 5,400C.
mgee Assistant Cashier 5,000El Paso Branch
50Cashier gVice President
75:80 Assistant Cashier 4,800"
C,
R,WlandT, e% zoerg
4 Arnold
Mr. . v..rdaman presented a letter dated April 27, 1948, from
President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, in
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
5125-A8
845
-12-
481)())18e to the Board's letter of April 12, 1948, with respect tothe
plats for the Jacksonville Branch Building. All of the members
q the Board indicated that they would prefer to adhere to the posi-
ti°11t0en in the Board's letter and it was understood that Mr.444
lictild prepare a draft of reply to Mr. McLarin's letter for
1481derati011 by the Board.
The action stated with respect to each of the matters here-illatter re
ferred to was taken by the Board:
MillIltes of actions taken by the Board of Governors of the
1 Re serve System on May 24, 1948, were approved unanimously.
14etflorandum dated May 12, 1948, from Mr. Evans stating that
'11111t8t011 and Mr. Thomas had selected Mr. Riefler as the third
141111 01* the Staff Editorial Committee to succeed Mr. Parry, who
4t4" APril 1, 1948, and recommending that the selection be
114' bY the Board.
Approved unanimously.
tette, 4_to Mr. Brainard, Federal Reserve Agent of the Federal
tr Of Cleveland, reading as follows:
4tt :Ill accordance with the request contained in your"r:!;14°I' May 20 1048, the Board of Governors approves,roia"'ve June 1' 1948, the payment of salaries to the
tiinE member; of the Federal Reserve Agent's staffIv rates indicated:
14/44' Cosgrove
Title Annual Salary Federal Reserve Agent's *3,480Representative,
4°11°4 M. Pittsburgh Branch
Trowbridge Federal Reserve Agent's 3,660"Representative,Pittsburgh Branch
Approved unanimously.Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
846
5/25/48
-13-
Letter to Mr. Viltse, Vice President of the Federal Reserve4.4 or „
'ew York, reading as follows:
till_ "Reference is made to your letter of May 18, 1948,tzitting the request of the Manufacturers andoFITre Trust Company, Buffalo, New York, for approval
4fle establishment of a branch in Ebenezer, New York,Il_eonnection with the proposed absorption of The-ulmiezer State Bank.ezia In view of your recommendation, the Board of Gov-brpl e aPproves the establishment and operation of a1,1;:ch in Ebenezer, New York, by the Manufacturers andCells Trust Company, Buffalo, New York, provided theL4Ption of The Ebeuezer State Bank is effected sub-
in accordance with the plan submitted; theobt-LaPProval of the appropriate State authorities isthe Rd, and with the understanding that Counsel forto +41;eserve Bank will review and satisfy himself as1008:4;e legality of all steps taken to effect the pro-'u absorption and establishment of the branch."
Approved unanimously.
LeNA tter to Mr. Vance L. Sailor, Chief, Division of Examination,
s4erzia
Deposit Insurance Corporation, reading as follows:
1146:111 compliance with the recent oral request of Mr.Your— °f Your Division, we are sending herewith, forNot c°nfidential information and use, photostatic
../3 of the following financial statements of theee 0 1Per Company, Jacksonville, Florida: balance
1.08D",,ae of December 31, 1942; statement of profit andlaci-1.1.or the year 1942; and schedules numbered 1, 2,
EuPPorting the balance sheet."
Approved unanimously.Letter
to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation reading1101.18z
Feder 4u,.1 euant to the provisions of section 12B of theO f
the Reserve Act, a8 amended, the Board of GovernorsFederal Reserve System hereby certifies that the
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
it A__zwierican State Bank, Lubbock, Texas, became a member of1;';ile Federal Reserve System on May 20, 1948, and is now a
41!Der of the System. The Board of Governors of the Fed-Reserve System further hereby certifies that, in
1:4ecti0n with the admission of such bank to membershipt„he Federal Reserve System, consideration was given
c7;the following factors enumerated in subsection (g)Bection 12B of the Federal Reserve Act:1- The financial history and condition of the
bank.2. The adequacy of its capital structure.3. Its future earnings prospects.4. The general character of its management.5. The convenience and needs of the community
to be served by the bank, and6. Whether or not its corporate powers are
consistent with the purposes of section12B of the Federal Reserve Act."
-14-
847
Approved unanimously.
Letter to Mr. Earhart, President of the Federal Reserve Bank
Cisco, reading as follows:
to "Thank you for your letter of May 5, 1948, in replyzlikt: letter of April 30 with reference to the buyingIrl;of°1 bankers' acceptances with resale agreement.Your--,1 of the explanation in the second paragraph of4ppr J-etter, the Board's telegram of January 14, 1948,
&1:i ;;n e minimum buying rate for bankers' acceptances
qi,allegarded as having included approval of a rate
eetPe1 cent for bankers' acceptances with resale
Nti flit is noted that the special commitment rate onbe di:4 13b loans guaranteed under Regulation V will
°4c4orsco11tinued at the next meeting of your Board of.,,
Approved unanimously.Meito
randum dated May 21, 1948, from Mr. Thomas, Director of
Nkti() Qf Research and Statistics, recommending, for the
tie etlited in the memorandum, that the System reporting form
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
848
—15-
(3140tion of quarterly information on interest rates on business
tade at banks in 19 principal cities be revised in the formItt
tackled to the memorandum for use beginning with the June report-
Approved unanimously.
It. Letter prepared for Chairman McCabe's signature to Mr. Arthur
1434, Chairman, National Security Resources Board, reading astoki
to i_nrz response to your letter of May 14, I am pleasedlion,1444„°rm you that the Board will be glad to have Mr.8,1iis ef Thomas, Director of the Division of ResearchAci 4Qtatistics, serve as a member of an Interdepartmentalflei;!nr Committee on Plans and Programs which you aretut;44%. up for a six months' period. It is understood
tilernbers of the Committee from the different agen-aZof the Federal Government will serve in their per-NA: capacities and not as official representatives of
agencies."
Chairman.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis