1938 - 1658 (1)
TRANSCRIPT
572
FLIGHT.
J U N E g 1938.
WESTLAND LYSANDER MARK
(890
b.p. Bristol Mercury XII
DIMENSIONS
AREAS
Length o.a. ... —
Wing span ... ... .... _ «• •••
Height o.a ... ... ... ... 1*
Wheel track
Chord at root .. ,.. ...
Tailpiane
span
... ... ... -•• •
„ chord
at
roo t ,;-. .
...
Airscrew diameter / _ . . . / - ...
Wing (incl. ailerons)
„
elear
of
fuselage
Ailerons
Fi n
'.
Rudder
Tailplane
Elevators
Flaps
sq.H.
260.0
250.0
18.5
17.5
8
35.0
3 S
29.0
When these considerations axe taken into account, the
adopt ion o thin type of undercarriage, which would other-
wise be rather puzzling, becomes quite logical.
From the aerodynamic point of view, the Westland de-
signers deserve the very greatest credit for having pro-
duced a fully slotted and flapped wing in which all opera-
tion is entirely automatic. The Han dley Page leading-edge
slots extend over the entire span of the wings, the inner
portion being a lift slot, while the outer portion is a
normal tip slot. The inner slot is connected by levers
and linkages to the trailing-edge flaps. By very careful
design the arrangement has been so adjusted tha t by a
suitable choice of take-off attitude the pilot can cause the
lift flaps to come down the desired number of degrees.
If he lifts the tail more during the take-off, the machine
will run along w ithout the slots opening or the flaps coming
down, whereas if the tail is kept lower than desired the
slots and flaps will open fully, and the drag will be greater
than desirable, so that probably the take-off run will be
increased. Similarly, on landing: by dropping the tail
sufficiently the leading-edge slot automatically brings the
flap down to its full ext en t, wh ich results in the steepest
approach and shortest landing run.
No Snag
It might have been thought that as the leading-edge
slot is, so to speak, incidence-operated, it might be pos-,
sible, in pulling the machine out of a steep dive, for
example, to cause the slot and flap to open at high speed.
This, however, has not been found to be the case, pre-
sumably because in a pull-out from a dive, the machine
does not reach an angle of incidence sufficiently great to
cause the slot to open.
Older readers of light will doubtless recollect the little
Widgeon monoplane built for one of the Lympne light plane
competitions and afterwards bough t by Dr. Reid. Th at
little machine was also a strut-braced monoplane, and its
plan form was very m uch like that of the modern Lysander
monoplane. This is not, of course, any mere coincidence,
bu t is due to the fact th at on the one hand it is not desired
to have a wide chord at the fuselage, and on the other tha t
the maximum wing strength is desired at the point where
the lift struts are attached. Consequently, in plan form
the chord is greatest along the line joining the lift str ut
a t tachments to the wing, and the wing tapers outward
and inward from this line.
The fuselage of the Lysander has the usual girder type
of construction, but the external shape is made rounded
by the addition of a light fairing of wood construction
clipped to the me tal fuselage prim ary struct ure . Gener-
ally speaking, the fuselage is of good shape from a drag
point of view, although the fact that it was desired to
place the pilot high above the fuselage in order to give
him a good view has somew hat interfered with w hat would
otherwise be a very nearly perfect streamline shape. That
the drag cannot be excessive is proved by the fact that
the Lysander Mk. I, when fitted with a Mercury XII engine
of 890 h.p., has a top speed of abou t 230 m.p.h . The
landing speed is 52 m.p.h. , the wide speed range being
attained very largely by a combination of high-wing load-
ing and the use of slots and flaps.
From a structural point of view, also, the Lysander is
rather unorthodox. To sum it up quite briefly it might
perhaps be said that the outstanding feature in its con-
struction is the very extensive use of extruded sections of
light alloy. There has been very close co-operation be-
tween the Lysander 's designers and two specialist firms,
High Duty Alloys, of Slough, and the Reynolds Tube
Co., Ltd.
Accessibility and ease of maintenance and servicing were
the guiding principles in deciding upon the general type
of construction . Th at solved the problem, girder or
monocoque? There still remained the deta ils. Ulti-
mately it was decided to use in the front portion of the
fuselage the type of construction of which the Westland
firm had such long and successful experience in the Wapiti
and Wallace biplanes: duralumin tubes of square section
joined by bolts and flat plates. For the rear portion,
Straight and sloping forked lugs are cut from special channel-
section extrusions.