1/9/2003 uta-gem simulation report venkatesh kaushik 1 simulation study of digital hadron...
Post on 22-Dec-2015
217 views
TRANSCRIPT
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
1
Simulation Study of Digital Hadron Calorimeter Using GEM
Venkatesh Kaushik*University of Texas at Arlington
•Introduction•GEM Geometry Implementation in Mokka•GEM Single Pion Studies •Conclusion
*On behalf of the HEP Group at UTA
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
2
Introduction• LC physics topics require
– Distinguish W from Z in two jet final states Good jet mass resolution– Higher Jet energy resolution;– Excellent jet angular resolution
• Energy flow algorithm is one of the solutions– Replace charged track energy with momentum measured in the tracking
system• Requires efficient removal of associated energy cluster Good
position resolution• Higher calorimeter granularity
– Use calorimeter only for neutral particle energies– Best known method for jet energy resolution improvement
• Large number of readout channel will drive up the cost for analogue style energy measurement Digital HCAL
• Tracking calorimeter with high gain sensitive gap
JetJet EE%30~
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
3
UTA Simulation Effort
• S. Habib and VK have been working on this project for their Master’s theses– Mokka geometry database downloaded and installed– Simple GEM geometry implemented– Completed single pion studies using GEM and TESLA-
TDR geometry.• Various software has been packaged and released
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
4
CERN-open-2000-344, A. Sharma
Large amplification
Gas Electron Multiplier (GEM)
• Exploring the possibility of using GEM in hadron calorimetry
• GEM DHCal Progress and Plans, A.White (Session IV, Jan 11, 8:30-10:00)
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
5
Single Pion StudiesGEM and TESLA TDR Geometry
• Single pion events using Mokka particle gun command – Incident energy range: 5 – 150 GeV
• Developed analysis programs to read total energies deposited per pion for each incident energy– Gain of the GEM detector given (3500) as a detector property– EM-HAD relative weighting factor necessary– Mean energy v/s incident pion energies – Energy conversion from the slope of the straight line– Conversion factors are 2.4% (for GEM) and 3.47% (for TDR)
and agree with the computed sampling fraction
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
6
TESLA TDR Geometry
Existing Geometry of Digital Hadron Calorimeter 8 staves each having 5 modules Each module has 40 layers, each layer
with plates of 18 mm of Fe and 6.5 mm of polystyrene scintillator
Hcal hits are collected Polystyrene scintillator, in cells of ~1 cm2
Hcal end-caps are build as 32 side Polyhedrons, with 40 layers inside, each layer with plates of 18 mm of Fe and 6.5 mm of Polystyrene scintillator
Courtesy: Paulo deFrietas
Replace with GEM
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
7
GEM Geometry Implementation Mechanics in Mokka
TDR / Hcal02 Model chosen for modification
Fe-GEM sub-detector instead of the existing Fe-ScintillatorNew driver for the HCal02 sub-detector moduleLocal database connectivity for HCal02 Database downloaded and implemented at UTA Courtesy: Paulo deFrietas
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
8
Double GEM Geometry
0. 0051. 0
Cu
Kapton
ArCO2
G10
0. 005
6.5mm Simple GEM
3.4 mm ArCO2
GEM3.1 mm
Detailed GEM
• Simple GEM uses average density
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
9
Comparison of Detailed and Simple GEM Geometries
Detailed GEM75GeV
• 25.2sec/event for Simple GEM v/s 43.7 sec/event for Detailed GEM• Responses look similar for detailed and simple GEM geometry• Simple GEM sufficient
<E>=0.80 0.007MeV <E>=0.81 0.008MeV
Simple GEM75GeV
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
10
Single Pion Cell Energy Deposit in GEM HCal
• GEM cell energy deposit is functional
• Used for discharge studies
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
11
• Incident pion energy 50 GeV. 2000 events
• Live energy deposit in Ecal and Hcal for TESLA TDR geometry
, Live energy (MeV) , Live energy (MeV)
Live Energy Deposit:TESLA TDR
Mean : 8.6 MeV/event Mean: 2.44 GeV/event
EM HAD
EEM EHAD
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
12
• ELive=EEM+ EHAD, Live energy (MeV) ELive
Mean : 1.92 GeV/event
TOTAL
Live Energy Deposit:TESLA TDR
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
13CERN GDD group
GEM gains
HV=420V
G=3500
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
14
Live Energy Deposit: GEM
TOTAL• Mean : 4.87 GeV/event
• Two Gaussian Fits
• G = 3500
• ELive=EEM+ GEHAD
, Live energy (GeV) ELive
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
15
EM-HAD Weighting Factor • ELive=EEM+ W GEHAD
• Obtained the relative weight W using two Gaussian fits to EM only v/s HAD only events
• Perform linear fit to Mean values as a function of incident pion energy
• Extract ratio of the slopes Weight factor W• E = C* ELive
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
16
Gaussian Fit to EM and HAD Only
E= 5 GeV
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
17
GEM Relative Weighting
EM
HAD
Relative WeightW = SlopeEM / SlopeHAD= 0.237
SlopeHAD
SlopeEM
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
18
GEM Live Energy before and after Weight factor
Before
After(Pion Energy)/Event (GeV)
# o
f P
ion
s
Live Energy/Event for 50 GeV Pion in Mokka GEM
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
19
Mean Live Vs Incident EnergyMean Energy Vs Incident Energy for GEM
y = 0.024x - 35.878
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Incident Energy (GeV)
Mea
n E
ner
gy
(GeV
)
Mean Energy (MeV) Vs Incident Energy for TDR
y = 0.0368x - 33.998
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Incident Energy (GeV)
Me
an
En
erg
y (
Ge
V)
CTDR = 0.038CGEM = 0.024
E = C * ELive
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
20
GEM Measured Energies for 100 GeV Pion
• Limited fit range to 3 for resolution
• Complete fit range for data
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
21
GEM and TESLA TDR Single Pion Resolution
Still about 10% worse than what French colleagues achieved Due to fitting of measured energy distributions
TESLA-TDRGEM
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation ReportVenkatesh Kaushik
22
Conclusions• UTA team has made a significant progress
– Double GEM prototype (see A. White’s talk) functional
• UTA Developed software packages have been handed-over to N. Graf– Pandora-Pythia ASCII HEPEVT output generator interface– Mokka reader– Mokka ROOT analysis– Mokka to JAS
• GEM Simulation effort making good progress– Geometry implementation completed
• Test for simple and detailed geometry shows consistency– Single pion study of GEM response needed a method to
obtain relative gain factor for EM and HAD normalization– Single pion response seems to be consistent with TDR– First glance at resolution seems to be comparable to TDR– Digital study in progress
• Eflow work will come next