16-1 logistics/supply chain control chapter 16 cr (2004) prentice hall, inc. the logistician is now...
TRANSCRIPT
16-1
Logistics/Supply Chain Control
Chapter 16CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc.
The logistician is now a process manager and no longer just an activities administrator.
16-2CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc.
CO
NT
RO
LL
ING
PL
AN
NIN
G
OR
GA
NIZ
ING
Correcting• Fine tuning• Major re-planning• Re-engineering
Measuring• Auditing• Performance
measures• Reporting
Standards/Goals
• Performance targets
Assessing• Status analysis• Benchmarking• Best-in-class
Controlling in Logistics/Supply Chain Management
16-3
•Control can be represented as a model whose key elements are:
-Inputs, process, and outputs-Standards and goals-Performance measurement-Monitoring-Corrective action
•Control systems are:-Open-loop-Closed-loop-Modified
A Control Paradigm
Definition The process where planned performance is brought into line or kept in line with desired objectives.
Definition The process where planned performance is brought into line or kept in line with desired objectives.
Schematic of Control Process
Elements of the control process
Inputs Outputs
Supply chain activitiesand customer service
levels
Activity costs andcustomer service
MonitorComparison by
manager, consultant, or computer
MonitorComparison by
manager, consultant, or computer
Corrective action
Corrective action
ProcessOngoing supply chain activities
ProcessOngoing supply chain activities
External and internal forces and changes
External and internal forces and changes
Performance reports
Performance reports
Standardsor goals
Standardsor goals
CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc. 16-4
CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc.
Open-Loop Control System
Service andinventory level goals
MonitorThe manager
Reports on costand service
ProcessWarehouseoperation
Corrective action:Adjust supply
Demand
Inputs Outputs
Stock resupply Stockouts andinventory costs
16-5
CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc.
Closed-Loop Control System
Decision ruleWhen L < ROP,
order Q*
Computerreport on L
Corrective action:Adjust supply
Demand, D
Inputs Outputs
Stock resupply, Q Inventoryon hand, L
Inventory standards for Q* and ROP
ProcessWarehouseoperation
16-6
CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc.
Modified Control System
Inventory standards for Q* and ROP
Decision ruleWhen L < ROP,
order Q*
Computerreport on L
ProcessWarehouseoperation
Corrective actionStock order on
supplier
Demand, D
Inputs Outputs
Stock resupply, Q Inventory on hand, L,stockouts and inventory costs
Manager
Reports on costs,service, product
promotions,production
schedules, etc.
16-7
16-8
Auditing Performance
Reasons for conducting an audit
•Bring logistics system in line with the inherent demand characteristics
•Identify opportunities for improvement
•Understand the nature of logistics in the firm and its relative costs
•Determine if logistics meets its performance goals
Elements to evaluate
•Customer service levels
•Transportation costs
•Inventory costs
•Demand levels
•Purchase costs
16-9CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc.
Benchmarking Performance
•Benchmarking
-Establishes an external reference point
-Compares company performance to the best-in-class
•Sources of benchmarking data
-Consulting firms
-University research centers
-Trade associations
-Sponsored studies
This Year Last Year Budget/TargetPhysical DistributionTransportation of finished goods Freight charges inbound to warehouses $2,700,000 $2,500,000 $2,800,000 Delivery charges outbound from warehouses 3,150,000 2,950,000 3,000,000 Freight charges on stock returns to plant 300,000 250,000 275,000 Extra delivery charges on back orders 450,000 400,000 400,000 Subtotal $6,600,000 $6,100,000 $5,475,000Finished goods inventories Inventories in transit 280,000 260,000 250,000 Storage costs at warehousesa 1,200,000 600,000 1,000,000 Materials-handling costs at warehouses 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,700,000 Costs of obsolete stock 310,000 290,000 300,000 Storage costs at plantsa 470,000 460,000 460,000 Materials-handling costs at plants 520,000 510,000 510,000 Subtotal $4,580,000 $4,020,000 $4,230,000Order processing costs Processing of customer orders $830,000 $840,000 $820,000 Processing stock replenishment orders 170,000 165,000 160,000 Processing of back orders 440,000 300,000 300,000 Subtotal $1,440,000 $1,305,000 $1,280,000Administration and overhead Proration of unallocated managerial expenses $240,000 $220,000 $230,000 Depreciation of owned storage space 180,000 180,000 180,000 Depreciation of materials-handling equipment 100,000 100,000 100,000 Depreciation of transportation equipment 50,000 70,000 50,000 Subtotal $ 570,000 $ 570,000 $ 560,000 Total distribution costs $13,190,000 $11,995,000 $12,545,000
Co
st-S
ervi
ce S
tate
men
t
CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc. 16-10
CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc.
Cost-Service Statement (Cont’d)
Physical SupplyTransportation of supply goods Freight charges inbound to plant $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,115,000 Expedited freight charges 300,000 250,000 350,000 Subtotal $1,500,000 $1,650,000 $1,465,000Supply goods inventories Storage costs on raw materials $300,000 $375,000 $275,000 Materials-handling cost on raw materials 270,000 245,000 260,000 Subtotal $570,000 $620,000 $535,000Order processing Processing of supply orders $55,000 $50,000 $50,000 Costs of expedited orders 10,000 10,000 10,000 Subtotal $65,000 $60,000 $60,000Administration and overhead supply goods Proration of unallocated managerial expenses $50,000 $60,000 $40,000 Depreciation of owned storage space 30,000 30,000 30,000 Depreciation of materials-handling equipment 40,000 40,000 40,000 Depreciation of transportation equipment 25,000 25,000 25,000 Subtotal $145,000 $155,000 $135,000 Total supply costs $2,280,000 $2,485,000 $2,195,000 Total distribution costs $13,190,000 $14,480,000 $14,740,000 Total logistics costs $15,470,000 $14,480,000 $14,740,000
This Year Last Year Budget/Target
16-11
CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc.
Cost-Service Statement (Cont’d)Customer ServicePercentage of warehouse deliveries withinone day
92% 90% 90%
Average in-stock percentageb 87% 85% 85%Total order cycle timec
(a) Normal processing 7 2 6 2 6 2 (b) Back-ordersplit delivery processing 10 3 10 3 10 3Back orders and split deliveries (a) Total number 503 490 490 (b) Percentage of total orders 2.5% 2.7% 2.5%Orders filled complete 90% 86% 87%Customer returns due to damage, deadstock, order processing errors, and latedeliveriesd
1.2% 2.6% 1.0%
Percentage of available production timeshutdown due to supply out-of-stocks 2.3% 2.4% 2.0%
a Includes space, insurance, taxes, and capital costs.b Percentage of individual product items filled directly from warehouse stocks.c Based on the distribution of order cycle times at the 95 th percentile.d Percentage of gross sales.
16-12
CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc.
Audit Instruments (Cont’d)The productivity report
Productivity MeasureThis
QuarterLast
Quarter
ThisQuarter
Last YearCompanyStandard
IndustryAveragea
Transportation Freight costs as a
percentage of distributioncosts
31% 30% 32% 29% 31%
Damage and loss claimsas a percentage of freightcosts
0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5%
Freight costs as apercentage of sales 9.6% 9.2% 10.2% 9.0% 8.8%
Inventories Inventory turnover 4.5 4.4 5.0 4.7 6.0 Obsolete stock to sales 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2Order Processing Orders processed per labor
hour 50 45 55 50 50 Percentage of orders
processed within 24 hoursof receipt
96% 92% 85% 95% 93%
Order processing costs tothe total number of ordersprocessed $5.50 $4.95 $5.65 $5.00
16-13
16-14CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc.
Productivity Report (Cont’d)
Warehousing Percentage of cube utilized 75% 70% 70% 70% 70% Units handled per labor
hour200 250 225 200 200
Customer Service Stock availability
(percentage of ordersfilled from primary stock) 98% 92% 90% 90% 85%
Percentage of ordersdelivered within 24 hoursof receipt
72% 70% 61% 85% 90%
16-15CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc.
Performance Control GraphControl graph for inventory turnover
16-16CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc.
SCOR ModelThe SCOR model:•Links processes or supply chain activities to performance measures, best practices, and software requirements•Provides a systematic approach for identifying, evaluating, and monitoring supply chain performance•Has a broad scope beginning with a demand forecast or
order placement and ending with final invoice and final payment•Accepts process description that can be product specific•Has a five component framework of plan, source, make,
deliver, and return•Incorporates five performance measures of reliability, responsiveness, flexibility, costs, and efficiency of asset utilization
CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc.
Scope of the SCOR Model
Source Make Deliver
Return Return
Source Make DeliverReturn Return
Source Make DeliverReturn Return
Focus companySupplierInternal or external
CustomerInternal or external
Plan
SCOR Model
Source Make Deliver
Return Return
Source Make DeliverReturn Return
Source Make DeliverReturn Return
Focus companySupplierInternal or external
CustomerInternal or external
Plan
Source Make Deliver
Return Return
Source Make DeliverReturn Return
Source Make DeliverReturn Return
Focus companySupplierInternal or external
CustomerInternal or external
Plan
SCOR Model
16-17
16-18
Process “Thread” Diagram
P=plan, S=source, M=make, and D=deliverCR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc.
Performance MetricsSC Performance Attribute Metric
Delivery Reliability •Delivery performance
•Fill rates
•Perfect order fulfillment
Responsiveness •Order fulfillment lead-times
Flexibility •Supply chain response time
•Production/vendor flexibility
Costs •Cost of goods sold
•Total SC management costs
•Value-added productivity
•Warranty/returns processing costs
Asset Management Efficiency •Cash-to-cash cycle time
•Inventory days of supply
•Asset turnsCR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc. 16-19
CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc.
Linking Processes and Metrics
16-20
16-21CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc.
Artificial Intelligence in Control
Artificial intelligence refers to computer recognition of adverse patterns in the performance reports and makes suggestions as to the courses of action that might be taken to correct the adverse performance patterns.
Artificial intelligence refers to computer recognition of adverse patterns in the performance reports and makes suggestions as to the courses of action that might be taken to correct the adverse performance patterns.
•Pattern recognition
•Performance patterns
•Courses of action