15-sept faculty report card estratman annual meeting/2… · median faculty performance 50.5 22.54%...
TRANSCRIPT
TEACHING CREDITS
FACULTYCONTACT
DAYS SINGLE
LEARNER
Percent Single
Learner days
(assume 224
CPD/yr)
CONTACT
DAYS
MULTIPLE
LEARNERS
Dr. Carley 29.5 13% 24.5
Dr. Cutlan 23 10% 0
Dr. Gordon 50.5 23% 2
Dr. Green 61.5 27% 48.75
Dr. Kim 35 16% 0
Dr. McIntee 118.5 53% 11
Dr. Melski 54 24% 119.5
Dr. Miech 18.5 8% 5.5
Dr. Patten 53 24% 18.5
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percent CPD working with learners past y
PerceAttend
Participated in Department QualityImprovement Activity
Clinical Role Model Score
Professional Mentor Score
Clinical Supervisor Score
Instructor Score
Evaluator Score
Dr. Smith 53 24% 14.25
Dr. Stratman 45.75 20% 68.5
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE SUBSPECIALTY DERM
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE 50.5 22.54% 14.25
For RADAR PLOT:
FACULTY
Percent CPD
working with
learners past
year
Completed
Program
Evaluation
Percent of
"At or
Above"
requested
Didactics/L
ectures/Lab
s/Worksho
ps
Dr. Carley 24% 0 50.00%
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM 31% 99% 75.00%
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE 30% 100% 100.00%
FACULTY
Percent CPD
working with
learners past
year
Completed
Program
Evaluation
Percent of
"At or
Above"
requested
Didactics/L
ectures/Lab
s/Worksho
ps
Dr. Cutlan 10% 100% 100%
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM 31% 99% 75%
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE 30% 100% 100%
FACULTY
Percent CPD
working with
learners past
year
Completed
Program
Evaluation
Percent of
"At or
Above"
requested
Didactics/L
ectures/Lab
s/Worksho
ps
Dr. Gordon 23% 100% 100%
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM 31% 99% 75%
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE 30% 100% 100%
FACULTY
Percent CPD
working with
learners past
year
Completed
Program
Evaluation
Percent of
"At or
Above"
requested
Didactics/L
ectures/Lab
s/Worksho
ps
Dr. Stratman 51% 100% 100%
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM 31% 99% 75%
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE 30% 100% 100%
FACULTY
Percent CPD
working with
learners past
year
Completed
Program
Evaluation
Percent of
"At or
Above"
requested
Didactics/L
ectures/Lab
s/Worksho
ps
Dr. Green 49% 100% 50%
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM 31% 99% 75%
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE 30% 100% 100%
FACULTY
Percent CPD
working with
learners past
year
Completed
Program
Evaluation
Percent of
"At or
Above"
requested
Didactics/L
ectures/Lab
s/Worksho
ps
Dr. Kim 16% 100% 100%
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM 31% 99% 75%
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE 30% 100% 100%
FACULTY
Percent CPD
working with
learners past
year
Completed
Program
Evaluation
Percent of
"At or
Above"
requested
Didactics/L
ectures/Lab
s/Worksho
ps
Dr. McIntee 58% 100% 100%
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM 31% 99% 75%
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE 30% 100% 100%
FACULTY
Percent CPD
working with
learners past
year
Completed
Program
Evaluation
Percent of
"At or
Above"
requested
Didactics/L
ectures/Lab
s/Worksho
ps
Dr. Melski 77% 100% 100%
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM 31% 99% 75%
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE 30% 100% 100%
FACULTY
Percent CPD
working with
learners past
year
Completed
Program
Evaluation
Percent of
"At or
Above"
requested
Didactics/L
ectures/Lab
s/Worksho
ps
Dr. Miech 11% 0% 100%
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM 31% 99% 75%
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE 30% 100% 100%
FACULTY
Percent CPD
working with
learners past
year
Completed
Program
Evaluation
Percent of
"At or
Above"
requested
Didactics/L
ectures/Lab
s/Worksho
ps
Dr. Patten 32% 100% 100%
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM 31% 99% 75%
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE 30% 100% 100%
FACULTY
Percent CPD
working with
learners past
year
Completed
Program
Evaluation
Percent of
"At or
Above"
requested
Didactics/L
ectures/Lab
s/Worksho
ps
Dr. Smith 30% 100% 100%
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM 31% 99% 75%
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE 30% 100% 100%
CONFERENCE CREDITS
Percent Multiple
Learner days
(assume 224
CPD/yr)
Percent CPD
working with
learners past
year
Completed
Program
Evaluation
Didactics/Lectures/La
bs/Workshops (Hrs)
Percent of "At or
Above" requested
Didactics/Lectures/La
bs/Workshops
11% 24% 0% 2 50.00%
0% 10% 100% 25 100.00%
1% 23% 100% 16.25 100.00%
22% 49% 100% 2 50.00%
0% 16% 100% 26 100.00%
5% 58% 100% 6 100.00%
53% 77% 100% 6.25 100.00%
2% 11% 0% 79.5 100.00%
8% 32% 100% 6.5 100.00%
year
Completed Program Evaluation
Percent of "At or Above" requestedDidactics/Lectures/Labs/Workshops
Percent of Assigned Resident EvaluationsCompleted
Percent of Direct Observation AssessmentsCompleted
Percent Max Scholarly Activity Points
ent Max Faculty Developmentdance (Max determined by PD)
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE G
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMA
6% 30% 100% 6 100.00%
31% 51% 100% 86.5 100.00%
31% 99% 4 75.00%
15% 99% 4 75.00%
6.36% 30.02% 1 6.5 100.00%
Percent of
Assigned
Resident
Evaluations
Completed
Percent of Direct
Observation
Assessments
Completed
Percent Max
Scholarly
Activity Points
Percent Max Faculty
Development
Attendance (Max
determined by PD)
Participated in
Department Quality
Improvement Activity
78% 86% 83% 40% 100%
99% 75% 33% 20% 100%
100% 50% 17% 20% 100%
Percent of
Assigned
Resident
Evaluations
Completed
Percent of Direct
Observation
Assessments
Completed
Percent Max
Scholarly
Activity Points
Percent Max Faculty
Development
Attendance (Max
determined by PD)
Participated in
Department Quality
Improvement Activity
90% 40% 17% 20% 100%
99% 75% 33% 20% 100%
100% 50% 17% 20% 100%
Percent of
Assigned
Resident
Evaluations
Completed
Percent of Direct
Observation
Assessments
Completed
Percent Max
Scholarly
Activity Points
Percent Max Faculty
Development
Attendance (Max
determined by PD)
Participated in
Department Quality
Improvement Activity
100% 0% 0% 20% 100%
99% 75% 33% 20% 100%
100% 50% 17% 20% 100%
Percent of
Assigned
Resident
Evaluations
Completed
Percent of Direct
Observation
Assessments
Completed
Percent Max
Scholarly
Activity Points
Percent Max Faculty
Development
Attendance (Max
determined by PD)
Participated in
Department Quality
Improvement Activity
100% 27% 100% 60% 100%
99% 75% 33% 20% 100%
100% 50% 17% 20% 100%
Percent of
Assigned
Resident
Evaluations
Completed
Percent of Direct
Observation
Assessments
Completed
Percent Max
Scholarly
Activity Points
Percent Max Faculty
Development
Attendance (Max
determined by PD)
Participated in
Department Quality
Improvement Activity
100% 94% 33% 20% 100%
99% 75% 33% 20% 100%
100% 50% 17% 20% 100%
Percent of
Assigned
Resident
Evaluations
Completed
Percent of Direct
Observation
Assessments
Completed
Percent Max
Scholarly
Activity Points
Percent Max Faculty
Development
Attendance (Max
determined by PD)
Participated in
Department Quality
Improvement Activity
100% 100% 33% 20% 100%
99% 75% 33% 20% 100%
100% 50% 17% 20% 100%
Percent of
Assigned
Resident
Evaluations
Completed
Percent of Direct
Observation
Assessments
Completed
Percent Max
Scholarly
Activity Points
Percent Max Faculty
Development
Attendance (Max
determined by PD)
Participated in
Department Quality
Improvement Activity
100% 100% 17% 20% 100%
99% 75% 33% 20% 100%
100% 50% 17% 20% 100%
Percent of
Assigned
Resident
Evaluations
Completed
Percent of Direct
Observation
Assessments
Completed
Percent Max
Scholarly
Activity Points
Percent Max Faculty
Development
Attendance (Max
determined by PD)
Participated in
Department Quality
Improvement Activity
100% 19% 17% 20% 100%
99% 75% 33% 20% 100%
100% 50% 17% 20% 100%
Percent of
Assigned
Resident
Evaluations
Completed
Percent of Direct
Observation
Assessments
Completed
Percent Max
Scholarly
Activity Points
Percent Max Faculty
Development
Attendance (Max
determined by PD)
Participated in
Department Quality
Improvement Activity
50% 100% 17% 40% 100%
99% 75% 33% 20% 100%
100% 50% 17% 20% 100%
Percent of
Assigned
Resident
Evaluations
Completed
Percent of Direct
Observation
Assessments
Completed
Percent Max
Scholarly
Activity Points
Percent Max Faculty
Development
Attendance (Max
determined by PD)
Participated in
Department Quality
Improvement Activity
100% 29% 17% 40% 100%
99% 75% 33% 20% 100%
100% 50% 17% 20% 100%
Percent of
Assigned
Resident
Evaluations
Completed
Percent of Direct
Observation
Assessments
Completed
Percent Max
Scholarly
Activity Points
Percent Max Faculty
Development
Attendance (Max
determined by PD)
Participated in
Department Quality
Improvement Activity
100% 50% 33% 20% 100%
99% 75% 33% 20% 100%
100% 50% 17% 20% 100%
July 1, 2014‐June 30, 2015
RESIDENT
EVALUATION
COMPLETION
Percent of
Assigned
Resident
Evaluations
Completed
Number of
Direct
Observation
Assessments
Expected
Number of
Direct
Observation
Assessments
Percent of
Direct
Observation
Assessments
Completed
SCHOLARLY
ACTIVITIES
Points (6 points
max)
7 78% 6 7 85.71% 5
7 90% 2 5 40.00% 1
4 100% 0 6 0.00% 0
13 100% 32 34 94.12% 2
10 100% 7 7 100.00% 2
15 100% 13 13 100.00% 1
13 100% 10 52 19.23% 1
7 50% 3 3 100.00% 1
7 100% 2 7 28.57% 1
GEN DERM
ANCE
11 100% 3 6 50.00% 2
13 100% 14 52 26.92% 6
99% 14 75.00% 2
99% 7 75.00% 2
10 1 6 50.00% 1
Clinical Role
Model Score
Professional
Mentor Score
Clinical
Supervisor
Score
Instructor
Score
Evaluator
Score
79% 81% 78% 79% 79%
75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
89% 89% 86% 87% 86%
Clinical Role
Model Score
Professional
Mentor Score
Clinical
Supervisor
Score
Instructor
Score
Evaluator
Score
87% 86% 88% 86% 86%
75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
89% 89% 86% 87% 86%
Clinical Role
Model Score
Professional
Mentor Score
Clinical
Supervisor
Score
Instructor
Score
Evaluator
Score
90% 73% 85% 73% 75%
75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
89% 89% 86% 87% 86%
Clinical Role
Model Score
Professional
Mentor Score
Clinical
Supervisor
Score
Instructor
Score
Evaluator
Score
96% 95% 96% 95% 95%
75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
89% 89% 86% 87% 86%
Clinical Role
Model Score
Professional
Mentor Score
Clinical
Supervisor
Score
Instructor
Score
Evaluator
Score
87% 89% 89% 89% 91%
75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
89% 89% 86% 87% 86%
Clinical Role
Model Score
Professional
Mentor Score
Clinical
Supervisor
Score
Instructor
Score
Evaluator
Score
90% 89% 86% 87% 85%
75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
89% 89% 86% 87% 86%
Clinical Role
Model Score
Professional
Mentor Score
Clinical
Supervisor
Score
Instructor
Score
Evaluator
Score
97% 96% 95% 96% 95%
75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
89% 89% 86% 87% 86%
Clinical Role
Model Score
Professional
Mentor Score
Clinical
Supervisor
Score
Instructor
Score
Evaluator
Score
99% 96% 98% 98% 95%
75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
89% 89% 86% 87% 86%
Clinical Role
Model Score
Professional
Mentor Score
Clinical
Supervisor
Score
Instructor
Score
Evaluator
Score
89% 92% 86% 94% 90%
75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
89% 89% 86% 87% 86%
Clinical Role
Model Score
Professional
Mentor Score
Clinical
Supervisor
Score
Instructor
Score
Evaluator
Score
79% 75% 75% 75% 76%
75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
89% 89% 86% 87% 86%
Clinical Role
Model Score
Professional
Mentor Score
Clinical
Supervisor
Score
Instructor
Score
Evaluator
Score
83% 82% 83% 83% 83%
75% 75% 75% 75% 75%
89% 89% 86% 87% 86%
AVERAGE RESIDENT EVALUATION SCORES
Percent Max
Scholarly
Activity Points
FACULTY
DEVELOPMENT
ATTENDANCE
Percent Max
Faculty
Development
Attendance
(Max
determined by
PD)
Participated in
Department
Quality
Improvement
Activity
CLINICAL ROLE
MODEL
Clinical Role
Model Score
83% 2 40% 100% 4.75 79%
17% 1 20% 100% 5.24 87%
0% 1 20% 100% 5.38 90%
33% 1 20% 100% 5.23 87%
33% 1 20% 100% 5.39 90%
17% 1 20% 100% 5.81 97%
17% 1 20% 100% 5.92 99%
17% 2 40% 100% 5.33 89%
17% 2 40% 100% 4.75 79%
33% 1 20% 100% 5 83%
100% 3 60% 100% 5.77 96%
33% 1 20% 100% 4.5 75%
33% 1 20% 100% 4.5 75%
16.67% 1 20.00% 100.00% 5.33 88.83%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percent CPD working with learnerspast year
Comp
Percent Max FAttendance (M
Participated in Department QualityImprovement Activity
Clinical Role Model Score
Professional Mentor Score
Clinical Supervisor Score
Instructor Score
Evaluator Score
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percent CPD working with learnerspast year
Completed Program Eva
Percent Didactics
P
PercA
Percent Max Sc
Percent Max Faculty DevelopmeAttendance (Max determined by P
Participated in Department QualityImprovement Activity
Clinical Role Model Score
Professional Mentor Score
Clinical Supervisor Score
Instructor Score
Evaluator Score
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percent CPD working with learnerspast year
Completed Program Eva
Percent Didactics
PeClinical Supervisor Score
Instructor Score
Evaluator Score
PercA
Percent Max Sc
Percent Max Faculty DevelopmenAttendance (Max determined by P
Participated in Department QualityImprovement Activity
Clinical Role Model Score
Professional Mentor Score
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percent CPD working with learnerspast year
Completed Program Eva
Percent Didactics
Pe
PercA
Percent Max Sc
Percent Max Faculty DevelopmenAttendance (Max determined by P
Participated in Department QualityImprovement Activity
Clinical Role Model Score
Professional Mentor Score
Clinical Supervisor Score
Instructor Score
Evaluator Score
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percent CPD working with learnerspast year
Completed Program Eva
Percent oDidactics
Pe
PercA
Percent Max Sch
Percent Max Faculty DevelopmenAttendance (Max determined by P
Participated in Department QualityImprovement Activity
Clinical Role Model Score
Professional Mentor Score
Clinical Supervisor Score
Instructor Score
Evaluator Score
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percent CPD working with learnerspast year
Comp
Clinical Supervisor Score
Instructor Score
Evaluator Score
Percent Max FAttendance (M
Participated in Department QualityImprovement Activity
Clinical Role Model Score
Professional Mentor Score
PROFESSIONAL
MENTOR
Professional
Mentor Score
CLINICAL
SUPERVISOR
Clinical
Supervisor
Score INSTRUCTOR
Instructor
Score EVALUATOR
4.83 81% 4.67 78% 4.75 79% 4.75
5.18 86% 5.27 88% 5.18 86% 5.14
4.38 73% 5.07 85% 4.38 73% 4.5
5.31 89% 5.31 89% 5.31 89% 5.46
5.32 89% 5.17 86% 5.23 87% 5.09
5.78 96% 5.7 95% 5.78 96% 5.7
5.77 96% 5.85 98% 5.85 98% 5.69
5.54 92% 5.17 86% 5.62 94% 5.42
4.5 75% 4.5 75% 4.5 75% 4.58
4.92 82% 5 83% 5 83% 5
5.69 95% 5.77 96% 5.69 95% 5.69
4.5 75% 4.5 75% 4.5 75% 4.5
4.5 75% 4.5 75% 4.5 75% 4.5
5.31 88.50% 5.17 86.17% 5.23 87.17% 5.14
pleted Program Evaluation
Percent of "At or Above" requestedDidactics/Lectures/Labs/Workshops
Percent of Assigned ResidentEvaluations Completed
Percent of Direct ObservationAssessments Completed
Percent Max Scholarly Activity Points
Faculty DevelopmentMax determined by PD)
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM
Dr. Carley
aluation
of "At or Above" requesteds/Lectures/Labs/Workshops
Percent of Assigned ResidentEvaluations Completed
cent of Direct ObservationAssessments Completed
cholarly Activity Points
entPD)
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM
Dr. Gordon
Prof
Clini
aluation
of "At or Above" requesteds/Lectures/Labs/Workshops
Percent of Assigned ResidentEvaluations Completed MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM
Clinic
cent of Direct ObservationAssessments Completed
cholarly Activity Points
ntPD)
Dr. Stratman
Profe
aluation
of "At or Above" requesteds/Lectures/Labs/Workshops
Percent of Assigned ResidentEvaluations Completed
cent of Direct ObservationAssessments Completed
cholarly Activity Points
ntPD)
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM
Dr. Kim
Profe
Clinic
aluation
of "At or Above" requesteds/Lectures/Labs/Workshops
ercent of Assigned ResidentEvaluations Completed
cent of Direct ObservationAssessments Completed
holarly Activity Points
ntPD)
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM
Dr. Melski
Profes
Clinica
pleted Program Evaluation
Percent of "At or Above" requestedDidactics/Lectures/Labs/Workshops
Percent of Assigned ResidentEvaluations Completed MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM
D P tt
Percent of Direct ObservationAssessments Completed
Percent Max Scholarly Activity Points
Faculty Developmentax determined by PD)
Dr. Patten
Evaluator
Score
79%
86%
75%
91%
85%
95%
95%
90%
76%
83%
95%
75%
75%
85.67%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percent CPD working withlearners past year
Completed Program Evaluati
Percent of "requ
Didactics/Lectur
Percent oEvalua
Percent of DAssessme
Percent Max ScholarlyPoints
Percent Max Faculty DevelopmentAttendance (Max determined by
PD)
Participated in DepartmentQuality Improvement Activity
Clinical Role Model Score
Professional Mentor Score
Clinical Supervisor Score
Instructor Score
Evaluator Score
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percent CPD working withlearners past year
Completed Program Evaluation
Percent of "At or Aboverequested
Didactics/Lectures/Labs/Wops
Percent of Assigned ReEvaluations Comple
Percent of Direct ObservAssessments Complet
Percent Max Scholarly ActivityPoints
Percent Max Faculty DevelopmentAttendance (Max determined by
PD)
Participated in DepartmentQuality Improvement Activity
Clinical Role Model Score
fessional Mentor Score
ical Supervisor Score
Instructor Score
Evaluator Score
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percent CPD working with learnerspast year
Completed Program Evaluation
Percent of "At or Above"requested
Didactics/Lectures/Labs/Worps
Percent of Assigned ReEvaluations Complet
cal Supervisor Score
Instructor Score
Evaluator Score
Percent of Direct ObservaAssessments Complete
Percent Max Scholarly ActivityPoints
Percent Max Faculty DevelopmentAttendance (Max determined by
PD)
Participated in Department QualityImprovement Activity
Clinical Role Model Score
essional Mentor Score
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percent CPD working with learnerspast year
Completed Program Evaluation
Percent of "At or Above"requested
Didactics/Lectures/Labs/Worps
Percent of Assigned ReEvaluations Complet
Percent of Direct ObservaAssessments Complete
Percent Max Scholarly ActivityPoints
Percent Max Faculty DevelopmentAttendance (Max determined by
PD)
Participated in Department QualityImprovement Activity
Clinical Role Model Score
essional Mentor Score
cal Supervisor Score
Instructor Score
Evaluator Score
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percent CPD working with learnerspast year
Completed Program Evaluation
Percent of "At or Above"requested
Didactics/Lectures/Labs/Workps
Percent of Assigned ResEvaluations Complet
Percent of Direct ObservaAssessments Complete
Percent Max Scholarly ActivityPoints
Percent Max Faculty DevelopmentAttendance (Max determined by
PD)
Participated in Department QualityImprovement Activity
Clinical Role Model Score
ssional Mentor Score
al Supervisor Score
Instructor Score
Evaluator Score
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percent CPD working withlearners past year
Completed Program Evaluatio
Percent of "requ
Didactics/Lecturp
Percent ofEvaluat
Clinical Supervisor Score
Instructor Score
Evaluator Score
Percent of DAssessme
Percent Max ScholarlyPoints
Percent Max Faculty DevelopmentAttendance (Max determined by
PD)
Participated in DepartmentQuality Improvement Activity
Clinical Role Model Score
Professional Mentor Score
ion
"At or Above"uestedres/Labs/Workshops
of Assigned Residentations Completed
Direct Observationents Completed
y Activity
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM
Dr. Cutlan
e"
orksho
esidenteted
vationted
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM
Dr. Cutlan
"
rksho
esidentted
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM
ationed
Dr. Green
"
rksho
esidentted
ationed
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM
Dr. McIntee
ksho
sidentted
ationed
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM
Dr. Miech
on
"At or Above"uestedres/Labs/Workshops
f Assigned Residenttions Completed
MEDIAN FACULTY PERFORMANCE
MARGINAL PERFORMANCE GEN DERM
D S ith
Direct Observationents Completed
y Activity
Dr. Smith