121115 baseline report on cetps - gpcb-kp.in · report on. 1 | page introduction promotion of...

Report on

1 | P a g e

Introduction

Promotion of industrial activity is widely seen as a desirable way to achieve sustainable development. For this result, however, their pollution problems, among others, must be overcome. Under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, every industry has to provide adequate treatment of its effluents before disposal, irrespective of whether it is in stream, land, sewerage system or sea. However, often the small scale industries (SSIs), due to their size and scale of operations often do not find it economically viable to install elaborate pollution control equipment. SSIs have significant contribution to the total industrial pollution load of the country. The Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETPs) are considered a viable treatment solution for collective treatment of effluents, particularly from small and medium scale industries. CETPs are seen as a solution to overcome the constraints associated with effluent treatment in the individual industries. CETPs could potentially help in achieving treatment of combined wastewater from various industries at lower unit costs and also help facilitate better compliance and monitoring with standards. However, there are also several issues associated with CETPs, including those related to technical, business/financial and management/operational. Considering the important role of CETPs and their contribution to sustainable economy, under the Indo German Environment Partnership (IGEP) Programme of the ongoing Indo German Bilateral Development Cooperation, “Waste Water Management” and successful planning & management of “Common Effluent Treatment Plants” (CETPs) in industrial areas have been taken up as priority areas of work. Under the IGEP Programme, which is jointly implemented by the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) of the Government of India and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, technical cooperation is being provided on these priority areas by GIZ, to the identified Indian partner organisations. The overall objective of the technical cooperation of GIZ on the core topic of CETP is, “To demonstrate innovative and financially sustainable solutions for Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETPs) for waste water treatment in India”. The activities for achieving this objective are divided into the following three phases: Phase I: Baseline studies of CETPs in India Formal consultation with experts at a national level workshop. Preparation for pilot works in the next phase

Phase II: Implementation of pilots for demonstration of innovative and financially sustainable solutions Training and development Dialogue with the relevant stakeholders

Phase III: Documentation and review of pilot work Stakeholder dialogue at National Level Development of policy guidelines and up scaling strategy

2 | P a g e

Presently, GIZ is working on a report on Situation Analysis/Baseline Study of the status of CETPs at national level to understand the number and location of CETPs, their performances with reference to technical, financial and managerial models, issues of concern, legal frameworks, institutional framework, standards etc. The report will be released soon for stakeholder consultation. Against this background, as a part of the Phase I activities, GIZ collaborated with the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) and CII-Triveni Water Institute and organized the 1-day National Workshop on “Common Effluent Treatment Plants” on November 23, 2012. The workshop was aimed at gathering key inputs from various stakeholders, viz. government bodies, industries, technology providers, infrastructure developers, investors and consultants on status of CETPs their performances along with type of technical, financial and managerial models adopted, issues of concern etc.

Programme of the Workshop

The workshop focused on:

1. Technical models for the CETPs. 2. Business models for the CETPs. 3. Implementation and management models for the CETPs.

The workshop programme included:

Inaugural session. Technical Session 1: Policies, Challenges and Opportunities Technical Session 2: Treatment Technologies and Monitoring

Technical Session 3: Business, Operating and Management Models

Concluding session. The programme details are given in Annexure I. The programme covered 18 technical presentations covering various relevant topics.

Participants in the Workshop The workshop received had over 130 participants including representatives of government bodies, industries, technology providers, infrastructure developers, investors and consultants. The list of participants that have registered is given at Annexure II.

3 | P a g e

Pic: Inaugural Session of the National Workshop

Inaugural Session of the Workshop The workshop started with an inaugural session. Mr. Ramesh Datla, Chairman, CII National Committee on IPR, Past Chairman, CII Andhra Pradesh and Managing Director, Elico Ltd, presented the Welcome remarks. Dr. Dieter Mutz, GIZ, Indo German Environment Partnership Programme presented the theme address and set the context for the workshop. There were three special addresses from: Dr. S Balaji, Member Secretary, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board,

Dr. Cherukuri Sreedhar, Executive Director, Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure

Corporation Ltd., and

Dr. K U Mistry, Chairman, Gujarat Pollution Control Board. The inaugural session concluded with Mr. S. Raghupathy Executive Director, CII-Godrej GBC, Hyderabad delivering the concluding remarks and thanking all the participants, speakers, project partner GIZ, press and media. The media coverage reflecting the Inaugural Session in given at Annexure III.

4 | P a g e

Pic: Dr. Cherukuri Sreedhar, ED, APIIC giving special address

Dr. Dieter Mutz, Director, IGEP giving special address

Technical Sessions of the Workshop In the technical sessions of the workshop, the following topics were presented. Technical Session I- Policies, Challenges and Opportunities

− Overview of CETPs in India: Status, Issues, Challenges − Proposed CETP guidelines of APIIC − CETP EIA Clearance − CETPs as an Opportunity for Industrial Promotion − CETPs in Tirupur

Technical Session II: Treatment Technologies and Monitoring

− Viable Technological Options for CETPs − CETP - Case Study of Vapi − Recycle and Reuse Technologies for Waste Water − Energy Efficient Turbo Blowers for Aeration − Best Available Technologies for CETPs − Bayer Tower Biology − CETPs in Gujarat

Technical Session III: Business, Operating and Management Models

− Best Practices on Operating and Management Models for CETPs − Management Aspects of CETPs − Operation and Maintenance of CETPs − Planning of CETPs in New Industrial Estates/ SEZ − Operation and Maintenance of Jawaharlal Nehru Pharma (JNPC) CETP − CETPs in Andhra Pradesh – Needs Assessment

5 | P a g e

The presentations are attached at Annexure IV. The presentations made by the speakers are uploaded in the CII website at www.greenbusinesscentre.com and GIZ website on www.ecoindustrialparks.net.

Pic: Mr. K.U.Mistry, Chairman, GPCB, Chairman of the Technical Session-2 and the speakers

Pic: Dr. Dieter Mutz, Director, GIZ-IGEP, Chairing the Technical Session 3, and the speakers

6 | P a g e

Pic: Participants of the workshop

Pic: Participants of the workshop

7 | P a g e

Concluding Session of the Workshop The Concluding Session of the workshop focused on collecting inputs and suggestions from the participants. Three groups were formed to discuss on the topics and to make presentation on the results from discussions. The topics covered by the groups included: Group 1: New government policies and supportive instruments required for supporting

CETPs in India. Group 2: Viable business/management models for setting up of CETPs in India: role of

private sector and PPP. Group 3: Innovative and viable technical solutions for CETPs in India.

Pic: Group 1 & 2 discussing on government policies and supportive instruments and viable business/management models

8 | P a g e

Pic: Group 3 discussing on Innovative and viable technical solutions for CETPs in India The following important points emerged from the group discussions. Group 1: New government policies and supportive instruments required for supporting CETPs in India

1. Presently there is no comprehensive document on CETP that reflects the technological, management and other relevant aspects, which can form a useful guide for planning and operating the CETPs. Preparation of such a comprehensive document should be taken up. Pilot exercises should be undertaken and case examples used while preparing comprehensive document on CETPs. There is a need for including guidelines in the document which will be helpful for planning and designing of CETPs.

2. There is a need for review of existing standards for CETPs and revising them rationally. Separate standards may be set up for existing and new CETPs both for inlet and outlet discharges, taking into consideration the constraints in retrofitting the existing CETPs and the scope and technological advancements in the case of new CETPs.

3. The concept of “Zero Liquid Discharge” is unclear due to which it could be interpreted in different ways. There is need for a clear definition.

4. There should be provisions in the policy for encouraging recycle/reuse of treated waste water from CETPs, which comply with a certain standard, especially in water scarce areas.

9 | P a g e

5. Presently a comprehensive policy on CETPs does not exist covering various aspects that

make CETPs a success. There is a need for developing such a policy. Considering very low rate of compliance with standards currently, to encourage compliances, there should be provisions for incentives included in the policy. There should be similar other supportive policies for non- complying CETPs. The policy should cover aspects of applying best available techniques, support for technology import or equipment import if necessary, etc.

6. There is a need for certified CETP operators and managers. A programme for capacity building of CETP operators and managers should be undertaken.

Group 2: Viable business/management models for setting up of CETPs in India: role of private sector and PPP

1. There is need to ensure fund commitments (capital and/or O&M) from user industries that discharge their effluents into CETPs.

2. The key stakeholders/agencies associated with successful planning and management of CETPs should be identified and the roles of stakeholders need to be well defined.

3. No member/user industry of CETP should be on the board of directors of the CETP, due to the issue of conflict of interest.

4. There should be guidelines on formation of SPVs for setting up of CETPs.

5. There is a need for development of CETP operators market to offer competitive, valued and reliable services. There are so far not many CETP operators in the Indian market.

Group 3: Innovative and viable technical solutions for CETPs in India

1. Some of the reasons for failure of CETPs are: − No proper planning / design; − Input parameters not monitored; − No penalties in place; − Lack of personnel training; and − Experts not engaged in operations and problem solving.

2. Best Available Technologies (BAT) should be explored. For example, Enzymatic technology for complex substance, Ion Exchange Resins for electroplating industries for cyanide removal and heavy metals, Membrane technology - electro dialysis, bipolar membrane etc.

3. There is a need for training of personnel to operate technologies such as Membrane Technologies.

10 | P a g e

4. There is a need for documentation and dissemination of information on Best Available Technology (BAT) for different industries. Example of “Environment Clinics” as being followed in by Gujarat SPCB could be followed.

5. Technological solutions should be suggested for CETPs in heterogeneous industry

clusters.

6. There is a need for formation of working group to discuss BAT for industry sectors and CETPs.

7. There are different technologies in the market. There is a need for testing of the technologies being offered in the market. For example, CETPs should ask technology providers to test their equipment on collected samples, and for undertaking Treatability Studies.

8. There should be uniformity in classification of industries.

9. For ensuring standards and quality of CETPs, a certification/rating system should be introduced.

10. There should be incentives for meeting standards. For example, agreeing for expansion of manufacturing capacities of industries can be one incentive.

11. A ready Trouble Shooting Guide should be prepared for CETPs.

12. There should be a common learning platform for CETP operators and managers.

13. Applied research is essential. Relationship between research institutes and industry should be strengthened.

14. “Technology” should be for providing real solutions and not only to satisfy norms.

15. Norms/standards should be set based on real and practical situations, and not based on hypothetical situations.

^^^

11 | P a g e

Annex 1: Workshop Programme

12 | P a g e

One Day National Workshop on

Common Effluent Treatment Plants Theme: Issues, Challenges, Opportunities, way forward

23 November 2012: CII‐ Sohrabji Godrej Green Business Centre, Hyderabad

Programme

0900 hrs Registration & Tea

0930 hrs ‐1020 hrs: Inaugural Session

0930 hrs Welcome Remarks Mr Ramesh Datla Chairman, CII National Committee on IPR, Past Chairman, CII Andhra Pradesh and Managing Director, Elico Ltd.

0935 hrs Theme Address Dr. Dieter Mutz GIZ, Indo German Environment Partnership Programme

0945 hrs Special Address Dr. S Balaji Member Secretary Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board

0955 hrs Special Address Dr. Cherukuri Sreedhar Executive Director Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd.

1005 hrs Special Address Dr. K U Mistry Chairman Gujarat Pollution Control Board

1015 hrs Concluding Remarks Mr S Raghupathy Executive Director CII – Godrej GBC

1020 hrs – 1145 hrs: Technical Session I: Policies, Challenges and Opportunities

1020 hrs Opening remarks by Session Chair Dr. S Balaji Member Secretary, TNPCB 1025 hrs Overview of CETPs in India: Mr N K Verma Status, Issues, Challenges Ex. Additional Director, CPCB

1040 hrs Proposed CETP guidelines of APIIC Mr Nagabushan Reddy General Manager

Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd.

1055 hrs CETP EIA Clearance Dr. M Anji Reddy Director Directorate of University Foreign Relations Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University

13 | P a g e

1110 hrs CETPs as an Opportunity for Industrial Mr Ajay K Jindal Promotion Chief Manager – Water Tech Larsen & Toubro Ltd.

1125 hrs Spotlight:

CETPs in Tirupur Mr Kannan Tamil Nadu State Pollution Control Board Coimbatore

1130 hrs Q & A

1145 hrs – 1330 hrs: Technical Session II: Treatment Technologies and Monitoring

1145 hrs Opening remarks by Session Chair Dr. K U Mistry Chairman Gujarat Pollution Control Board

1150 hrs Viable Technological Options for CETPs Er. M Karthik Sr. Scientist, NEERI

1205 hrs CETP ‐ Case Study of Vapi Mr Raviraj Assistant Manager Vapi Waste & Effluent Management Company Ltd.

1220 hrs Recycle and Reuse Technologies Dr. Christian Kazner for Waste Water Institute for Ecopreneurship, School of Life Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Switzerland

1235 hrs Energy Efficient Turbo Blowers for Aeration Mr Kiron Pande Sr. General Manager (Compressed Air Solutions) Godrej & Boyce Mfg Co Ltd.

1250 hrs Spotlights (5 minutes each):

Best Available Technologies for CETPs Mr R Hrishikesh Mahadev Junior Advisor, GIZ (IGEP)

Bayer Tower Biology Ms Jyoti Pawar Manager‐Business Development & Process Bayer Technology Services

CETPs in Gujarat Mr Nitesh Patel Junior Advisor, GIZ (IGEP)

1305 hrs Q & A

1330 hrs Lunch

14 | P a g e

1430 hrs – 1615 hrs: Technical Session III: Business, Operating and Management Models

1430 hrs Opening remarks by Session Chair Dr. Dieter Mutz GIZ, Indo German Environment Partnership Programme 1435 hrs Best Practices on Operating and Mr Sajid Hussain Management Models for CETPs Head ‐O&M, TWIC

1450 hrs Management Aspects of CETP Mr K R Desai CEO, NCTL, Ankleshwar 1505 hrs Operation and Maintenance of CETPs Mr Ramana Murthy Whole Time Director Patancheru Enviro Tech Ltd. 1520 hrs Spotlights (5 minutes each):

Planning of CETPs in New Industrial Estates / Mr C V Sundara Rajan SEZ City Office Manager (COM) & Head Environment section L&T‐Ramboll Consulting Engineers Ltd.

Operation and Maintenance of JNPC CETP Dr. Srinivas, JN Pharma City CETP

CETPs in Andhra Pradesh ‐ Needs Mr Sam Ratnakar

Assessment Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd., Hyderabad

1545 hrs Q&A

1615 hrs ‐1730 hrs: Concluding Session

1615 hrs Group Work: Group 1: New government policies and supportive instruments required for supporting CETPs in India

Group 2: Viable business/management models for setting up of CETPs in India: role of private sector and PPP


1645 hrs Group Presentations

1730 hrs Concluding Remarks Dr. Dieter Mutz GIZ, Indo German Environment Partnership Programme &

Confederation of Indian Industry

^^^^

15 | P a g e

Annex 2: List of Registered Participants

Sl.No Name Designation Organization City Mobile Email Telephone

1 Mr Azhar Sha.Syed StudentAnna University of Technology

TirunelveliTirunelveli 9490982190 [email protected]

2 Mr B V Siva Reddy Env. Engineer APIIC Hyderabad 9948082333

3 Mr M Raj Kiran Env. Engineer APIIC Hyderabad 9951088211

4 Mr Abhijeet N Sr Consultant APITCO Limited Hyderabad 9440832230 [email protected] 040 23237333

5 Ms Tanuja Consultant APITCO Limited Hyderabad [email protected] 040 23237333

6 Mr K Kumar Manager Aqua Designs I Pvt Ltd., Chennai7569091500/

[email protected]

7 Ms Ramadevi Kanneganti PresidentAssociation of Lady Entreprenuers of

Andhra PradeshHyderabad [email protected] 040 23735439

8 Mr Phaendra Kumar Sales Engineer Atlas Copco India Ltd. Hyderabad 93941 79378 [email protected] 040 32949090

9 Mr Ramnatheertha Sales Engineer Atlas Copco India Ltd. Hyderabad 9908323666 [email protected] 040 32949090

10 Mr Sujan Kumar Sales Engineer Atlas Copco India Ltd. Hyderabad 9390804646 [email protected] 040 32949090

11 Mr Nazimudh Sr Environment Engineer CPCB Gujarat 9411232637

12 Dr. Renu Gera Chief of Party DAI New Delhi

13 Mr Vijay Kumar Yadav Lead Auditor & Trainer DET NORSKE VERITAS ( DNV ) AS Hyderabad [email protected]

[email protected] 23418186/87

14 Mr V Sreenivas Director Eco Green Solution (P) Ltd Bangalore 886776000 [email protected] 080-65972455

15 Mr Rakesh Ravindran Sr. Marketing Engineer (Analysis) Endress+Hauser India Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai 9930313436 [email protected] 22 66481111

16 Mr S Natarajan Area Manager-Sales Endress+Hauser India Pvt. Ltd. Hyderabad [email protected]

m

Participants ListParticipants ListParticipants ListParticipants List


23 November 2012, CII -Godrej GBC, HyderabadCommon Effluent Treatment Plants in India


17 Mr Anand Krishnamurthy Senior Marketing Manager GE Water and Process Technologies Bangalore 9008825009 [email protected] 080 42665821

18 Mr K Elango Director Get Water Solutions Pvt Ltd Chennai 98400 46744 [email protected] 044 30685555

19 Mr Narsaimha Rao Group Head - Central Zone Get Water Solutions Pvt Ltd Chennai 9849808494 [email protected] 044 30685555

20 Mr A Murugiah Sr Vice President Get Water Solutions Pvt Ltd Chennai 9600065817 [email protected] 044 30685555

21 Mr Gopala Rao Gulla GM-ProjectsGMR Hyderabad International Airport -

CPDHyderabad 8008620606 [email protected] 040-67394006

22 Mr Jinesh Purushothaman Director Guardex Group Mumbai 9821144986 [email protected]

23 Mr A A Dolt Regional Officer Gujarat Pollution Control Board Gujarat 9879964891

24 Mr G H Trivedi Vigilance Offier Gujarat Pollution Control Board Gujarat 9824063646

25 Mr G Ravindra Reddy Asst BDM - Industrial Process Hach Company Hyderabad 98490 93860 [email protected] 49145656

26 Mr K P Rajan Consulting Engineer Hi Tech Power Gens Hyderabad 9849008349 [email protected] 23402846

27 Mr Mayilsamy M Marketing InchargeHiyoshi India Ecological Services Private

LimitedChennai 9943459367 [email protected] 044-4305 1111

28 Mr B Chaitanya Reddy Engineer IFFCO Kisan SEZ Limited. Nellore 9052062505 [email protected] 08610-2320483

29 Mr B Vinod Kumar Dy DirectorIndo-German Institute of Advanced

TechnologyVisakhapatnam 9246646008 [email protected] 0891-3258788

30 Mr N Ravi Kumar Director Indwa Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Hyderabad 98485 32239 [email protected] 040 23411515

31 Mr Roopkumar S Vegunta AVP - F& A Indwa Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Hyderabad 9912222402 [email protected] 040 2341 6898

32 Mr D Bhavani Shankar Asst Manager - Designs Indwa Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Hyderabad 99480 22294 [email protected] 040 23411515

33 Ch Sasikala Prof. and Head Institute of Science & Technology, JNTU Hyderabad 9000796341 [email protected]

34 Mr S R Venkatesan Director - Cleantech Invest Sweden Bangalore 9980034599 [email protected]

35 Mr Prabhakar Kumar Branch Manager Ion Exhange India Ltd. Hyderabad 9346149991 [email protected] 040-30663138

36 Mr AVVS Chalapathi Asst Manager ITC PSPD Chennai 9868202791 [email protected] 08746-242331

37 Mr K Lakshmana Rao Whole Time Director Jeedimetla Effluent Treatment Ltd Jeedimetla 9948022112 [email protected] 040-23094367


38 Mr Ratna Kumar Director Jeedimetla Effluent Treatment Ltd Jeedimetla 8886422118 [email protected] 040-23094367

39 Mr P Sandeep JNTU Hyderabad 905253269

40 Ms Divya Sree B Student JNTU Hyderabad 986622884

41 Ms Swathi Student JNTU Hyderabad 9963309692

42 Mr B N Satish Bedi Student JNTU Hyderabad 98801786319

43 Mr Shivam BDE IGES Hyderabad 9640916288

44 Mr Sandeep BDE IGES Hyderabad 9705794142

45 Dr. Srini Director Mana ETP 9550445577

46 Mr K R Rajendran General Manager Kalady Rice Millers Consortium (Pvt) Ltd Ernakulam 9447190625 [email protected] 0484-3051821

47 Mr Naryanankutty Financial Advisor Kalady Rice Millers Consortium (Pvt) Ltd Ernakulam [email protected]

48 Mr V Bhaskar Asst Manager - Sales Kamco Engineering Hyderabad 9394004646 [email protected] 66826227

49 Mr B Raja Sreedhar Hospital Administrator Kamineni Hospitals Hyderabad 9966184423 [email protected] 040-39879999

50 Mr M K Sajjan Ex Engineer KUIBGC Karnataka Karnataka 9448221633

51 Ms Shama Kamat Officer - R & D L & T Hydrocarbon Mumbai [email protected] 22 67052270

52 Mr K SaravananHead - Business Development,

Industrial Water SegmentL&T Construction Chennai 9444398696 [email protected] 044 2270 4902

53 Mr Ramprakash Yadav Engineering Manager (Civil) L&T Construction Chennai 8939722151 [email protected] 044 2270 5959

54 Dr K Rama KrishnaSr Engineering

Consultant_Environment

L&T-Rambøll Consulting Engineers

LimitedHyderabad 9491035057 [email protected] 40354453

55 Ms S A Karisma Sr Engineering ConsultantL&T-Rambøll Consulting Engineers

LimitedHyderabad 7382627648

56 Mr M Venkateswara Rao Asst Manager - Projects LID CAP Ltd. Hyderabad 9000011428

57 Mr N Adhikari FI LID CAP Ltd. Hyderabad 9849467199

58 Dr. Sahebrao Sonkamble Job contractNational Geophysical Research Institute

(CSIR-NGRI)Hyderabad 9441455291 [email protected] 40-23434657

59 Mrs. Deepa Negi Kapardar Project FellowNational Geophysical Research Institute

(CSIR-NGRI)Hyderabad 9676153246 [email protected] 40-23434657


60 Ms Fatima Ali Research ScholarNational Geophysical Research Institute

(CSIR-NGRI)Hyderabad 9951508040 [email protected]

61 Mr Pavan Kishore Marketing Manager Neel Hydro Tech Pune 9011058065 [email protected] 2024476611

62 Mr Shaik Pentu Saheb Chief Scientist & Head NEERI, Zonal Laboratory Hyderabad 9490712833 [email protected] 40-27160122

63 Mr Tapas Chakraborty VP Corporate HSE & Sustainability Neuland Labortories Ltd. Hyderabad 9642282727 [email protected] 30211600

64 Mr N Thandavaraya Murthy Manager- Marketing & Proposal Polutech Limited Chennai 9677 284 666 [email protected] 044-25306669

65 Mr Sidharth Rao Engineer Polutech Limited Chennai 9500059214 [email protected] 044-25306669

66 Mr Sandeep Bhalerao Joint General Manager Praj Industries Limited Pune +917387089704 [email protected] 020-66754000

67 Mr Bejoy Kothari General Manager Praj Industries Limited Pune +919483547890 [email protected] 020-66754000

68 Mr Akbar Pasha Dy.Manager RAK Ceramics Hyderabad 9246617534 [email protected]

69 Mr Appala Naidu ISO-Co-ordinator RAK Ceramics Hyderabad 9246675053 [email protected]

70 Mr Rajesh Sharma Supervisor RAK Ceramics Hyderabad 9246817503 [email protected]

71 Mr Pardesi Naidu Supervisor RAK Ceramics Hyderabad [email protected]

72 Ms Vandana Chummun Process Engineer Ramky Enviro Engineers Ltd. Hyderabad [email protected];

[email protected]

73 Mr Abinash Patro Asst Manager Ramky Enviro Engineers Ltd. Hyderabad 8978811772 [email protected]

74 Dr. Srinivas K Head - Planning & Technical Ramky Enviro Engineers Ltd. Hyderabad 8978922664 [email protected]

75 Mr V Venkata Narayana Head - Business Development Revolve Engineers Pvt Ltd. Hyderabad 8106944559 [email protected] 040 4044545111

76 Dr Jasveen Jairath SOUL Hyderabad 9441233967 [email protected] 040 6554 1838

77 Mr Y D Rajesh Managing Director SRACO Hyderabad 092462 26447 [email protected]

78 Mrs Madhuri Rajesh Managing Director SRACO Hyderabad 092462 26445 [email protected]

79 Mr L Grijapathi Asst Director of IndsThe Federation of Andhra Pradesh

Chambers of Commerce & IndustryHyderabad 9959822264 [email protected] 040 23395515

80 Mr G.Mahindra Duty Engineer The Westin Hyderabad Hyderabad 8790001148 [email protected] 8008337373


81 Mr Goud Boiler Operator The Westin Hyderabad Hyderabad 8686422645 [email protected] 40.6767.6410

82 Mr Ranjan Plumber The Westin Hyderabad Hyderabad 8886826043 [email protected] 40.6767.6410

83 Mr Rajesh Bhutani Thermax India Mumbai 9848277096 [email protected]

84 Mr Srikar Vemula Sales Engineer Toshbro Controls Pvt Ltd Mumbai 9849515980 [email protected] 24 28470545

85 Mr Kandaiah H DGM - IPM TVS & SONS LTD., Madurai 9500036764 [email protected] 0452 - 2356400

86 Mr S S R Murthy Manager Voyants Solution Pvt Ltd. Hyderabad 9618322266

87 Mr Y Chandra Shekhar Reddy Asst Manager Voyants Solution Pvt Ltd. Hyderabad 8500241797

88 Mr N Krishnan Director Water Systems India (P) Ltd Chennai 9444024451 [email protected]

89 Mr Subramanian Water Systems India (P) Ltd Chennai 9959556223 [email protected]

90 Mr Vijay BhaskarClient Service Manager -

SustainabilityWeston Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. Hyderabad 94405 32787 [email protected] 3048 0900

91 Mr R Raman Sr. Manager - Marketing Wires & Fabriks (S.A) Ltd. Jaipur 9829050717 [email protected]

Annex III: Media Coverage

3 | P a g e

Annex IV: Presentations

1

Page 1

OVERVIEW OF CETPs IN INDIA status, issues and challenges

N.K. Verma

Former Additional Director, CPCB

15/12/2012 Page 2

Establishment of CETPs in India

15/12/2012

• First unit of CETP at Pali (Raj.) established in 1983 by RIICO.

• At the same time, establishment of CETP for tanneries in T.N.

taken up by state PSU.

• CETP at Jeedimetla (A.P.) established in 1989 in phased manner,

by industries.

• CETP at Pattancheru also established in 1989 by forming a

company by industries with the support of APIIC.

• MoEF scheme for funding of CETPs started in 1991 which led to establishment of several CETPs.

Page 315/12/2012

• A large capacity CETP of 55 MLD capacity was set up at Vapi(Guj.) in 1997 by GIDC.

• A CETP at Pallavaram (T.N.) established with tertiary treatment

system in 1995

Establishment of CETPs in India

Page 4

Status of CETPs in India

15/12/2012

• Total CETPs in India = 153

• Total hydraulic capacity catering to 15,000 units = 1190 MLD

• 60% of CETPs ranges upto = 5 MLD

• 29% of CETPs in the range of = above 5 to 10 MLD

• 11% of CETPs in the range of = above 20 MLD

Page 5

CETPs Distribution in India (Total CETPs = 141)

15/12/2012

CETPs in India

[141 CETPs]

South Zone

[50 CETPs]

Andhra Pradesh

[4 CETPs]

Karnataka

[7 CETPs ]

Tamil Nadu

[39 CETPs]

North Zone

[22 CETPs]

Delhi

[15 CETPs]

Uttar Pradesh

[4 CETPs]

Haryana

[1 CETP]

Punjab

[2 CETPs]

East Zone

[1 CETP]

West Bengal

[1 CETP]

West Zone

[58 CETPs]

Maharashtra

[24 CETPs]

Gujarat

[34 CETPs]

Central Zone

[10 CETPs]

Rajasthan

[9 CETPs]

Madhya Pradesh

[1 CETP]

Some of the CETPs are catering to specific industry sectors, viz, textiles,

tanneries, electroplating and chemicals.

Page 6

Components of CETPs

15/12/2012

Effluent Conveyance System

� Tanker

� Pipeline (gravity / pressurized)

� Hybrid System

• Material of Constriction (MOC) to take care of corrosion problem

• Need for separate conveyance system for different treatment

schemes and for use of recovered water

2

Page 715/12/2012

Treatment Scheme:

• Conventional System (Physcio – Chemical and biological treatment)

• Conventional with tertiary system (pressure filtration, activated carbon, additional physcio – chemical treatment)

• Additional system (MEE, Advance oxidation process, Ammoniacal –nitrogen removal)

Disposal:

• Pipeline for treated effluent

• Sludge dewatering and disposal

Recovery:

• Infrastructure for supply of recovered water

Components of CETPs

Page 815/12/2012

Technical aspects :

• Establishment of CETPs

(Feasibility assessments, planning, choice of technology and

designing)

• Operational issue of CETPs

� Maintaining of operating parameters of treatment units

(Shortcomings in maintaining operating parameters as pernorms/design value. Need for technical guidelines.)

� Achievability of design efficiency for pollutants removal

(Influent characteristics not matching with design value andoperation not modified as needed and/or required up-gradation not

done)

Functioning of CETPs

Page 9

Contd….

company presentation 201215/12/2012

• Adequacy of sludge removal, treatment and disposal

(Issue of dewatering of sludge and appropriate disposal – needs

environmentally sound system)

• Compliance of standards prescribed by SPCBs

i. Non compliance of S.S & B.O.D. parameters due to lack in properoperation.

ii. Difficulties in achieving standards for parameters like color,

ammoniacal nitrogen, refractory COD, TDS, surfactants etc.

• Achievability of receiving water quality standards

(Not aimed at while planning and designing CETP)

Page 10


15/12/2012

Business Models:

• Establishment and operation by State Industrial Development Authority

/ other public body

(Operation not continued by IDAs and Industrial Associations/Societies

took over)

• Establishment by IDA and operation by private agency / industry association / trust / company

(Problem of control over industries in sending entire effluent as well as required pre-treatment, levy of user charges etc.)

Page 11

Contd….


• Establishment and operation by private agency / industries company orsociety

(Issue of recovery of capital cost in addition to O&M cost)

• Establishment under PPP mode (SPV) and operation by SPV or

private agency

(Requirement of organizational setup at SPV and need for soundcontractual agreement, including tripartite agreement involving user

industry as well as requirement of constituting tariff committee byinvolving industrial development and regulatory authorities.)

Page 1215/12/2012

Financial Models:

• Land by IDAs

(Presently, no provision for land in many clusters)

Subsidies under various schemes of

• Ministry of Environment & Forests, Ministry of Commerce & Industry & Ministryof Textile, G.O.I

• State Govt. Schemes in states of Gujarat, Tamil Nadu & Karnataka.

i. Difficulties faced for balance amount required in establishing CETP, besidesO&M cost

ii. In case of Delhi, relevant Act & Rules made by Government to recover capital

expenditure from industries for CETPs established and provision to recoverO&M cost by Industry Associations/Societies


3

Page 13

Issues Related to Notified Standards Under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

15/12/2012

No inlet effluent standards prescribed for BOD, COD and TDS

• Guidelines needed for regulating inlet quality and design purpose

• Need for suitable treated effluent standards in case of disposal into

sewer line with terminal STP.

Ammoniacal Nitrogen standards same for inlet effluent and treated effluent

• Some CETPs are required to treat such pollutant in high concentration

Page 14

Contd….


• Non-applicability of pH limit for inlet effluent in case of CETPs are totreat effluent of electroplating / pickling units, if corrosion aspect in

conveyance taken care of.

• Non-applicability of limit for toxic metals (like chromium, Nickel and

Zinc) in case of CETPs designed for treating such pollutants withseparate conveyance.

• Need for separate standards for COD linking with Toxicity Factor (T.F.)

in case of deep sea disposal through diffuser system.

Page 15

Challenges


• Policy related:

• Need for clearly defined policies and programmes at central, state

and institutional levels.

• Need for setting priorities in 5-year plans, annual plans, action plans

• Development of technical and management guidelines for CETPs

• Develop supportive instruments for increasing compliances by allexisting CETPs

• Business/management related:

• Choice of most appropriate business models and managementmodels

• Private sector and market development for CETP services

• Appropriate management systems, eg. collection of user charges,penalties etc.

• Viability and financial mobilization

Page 1615/12/2012

• Technology related:

• Streamlining planning and designing stages

• Application of innovative and economically viable technologies,

specially for TDS, refractory COD, Ammoniacal nitrogen,surfactants etc.

• Availability of expertise for evaluation of adequacy of CETPs

• Effective monitoring systems, eg. Online monitoring

• Some quality certification arrangements, benchmarking

• Infrastructure for collection and disposal systems, including

recovered water

• In existing CETPs, additional treatment units for specific pollutantsas well as achieving standards

Contd….

Page 1715/12/2012

Thank You

1

Page 1

ProposedProposedProposedProposed

CETP GuidelinesCETP GuidelinesCETP GuidelinesCETP Guidelines

19/11/2012

Andhra Pradesh IndustrialAndhra Pradesh IndustrialAndhra Pradesh IndustrialAndhra Pradesh IndustrialAndhra Pradesh IndustrialAndhra Pradesh IndustrialAndhra Pradesh IndustrialAndhra Pradesh Industrial

Infrastructure Corporation Ltd.Infrastructure Corporation Ltd.Infrastructure Corporation Ltd.Infrastructure Corporation Ltd.Infrastructure Corporation Ltd.Infrastructure Corporation Ltd.Infrastructure Corporation Ltd.Infrastructure Corporation Ltd.

Page 219/11/201219/11/201219/11/201219/11/2012

About APIICAbout APIICAbout APIICAbout APIIC

� APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC incorporatedincorporatedincorporatedincorporated onononon SeptemberSeptemberSeptemberSeptember 26262626,,,, 1973197319731973 isisisis thethethethe statestatestatestate ownedownedownedowned organizationorganizationorganizationorganization

vestedvestedvestedvested withwithwithwith thethethethe responsibilityresponsibilityresponsibilityresponsibility ofofofof developingdevelopingdevelopingdeveloping industrialindustrialindustrialindustrial parksparksparksparks andandandand industrialindustrialindustrialindustrial

infrastructureinfrastructureinfrastructureinfrastructure inininin AndhraAndhraAndhraAndhra PradeshPradeshPradeshPradesh....

� APIIC’sAPIIC’sAPIIC’sAPIIC’s visionvisionvisionvision isisisis totototo developdevelopdevelopdevelop thethethethe IndustrialIndustrialIndustrialIndustrial Parks/SEZsParks/SEZsParks/SEZsParks/SEZs withwithwithwith integratedintegratedintegratedintegrated wellwellwellwell----

plannedplannedplannedplanned infrastructureinfrastructureinfrastructureinfrastructure andandandand anananan efficientefficientefficientefficient managementmanagementmanagementmanagement structurestructurestructurestructure whichwhichwhichwhich shallshallshallshall ensureensureensureensure

continualcontinualcontinualcontinual globalglobalglobalglobal competitivenesscompetitivenesscompetitivenesscompetitiveness....

� RoleRoleRoleRole ofofofof APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC isisisis thatthatthatthat ofofofof aaaa facilitatorfacilitatorfacilitatorfacilitator forforforfor megamegamegamega infrastructureinfrastructureinfrastructureinfrastructure projectsprojectsprojectsprojects apartapartapartapart fromfromfromfrom

IndustrialIndustrialIndustrialIndustrial ParksParksParksParks developeddevelopeddevelopeddeveloped onononon itsitsitsits ownownownown....

� APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC hashashashas sosososo farfarfarfar developeddevelopeddevelopeddeveloped aboutaboutaboutabout 320320320320 industrialindustrialindustrialindustrial areasareasareasareas spreadingspreadingspreadingspreading overoveroverover anananan extentextentextentextent

ofofofof moremoremoremore thanthanthanthan 120120120120,,,,000000000000 acresacresacresacres

Page 3

Centrally Sponsored Scheme for CETPsCentrally Sponsored Scheme for CETPsCentrally Sponsored Scheme for CETPsCentrally Sponsored Scheme for CETPs

19/11/2012

• MoEF revised the MoEF revised the MoEF revised the MoEF revised the Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) guidelines guidelines guidelines guidelines

in the year 2012.in the year 2012.in the year 2012.in the year 2012.

• As per the revised guidelines, tAs per the revised guidelines, tAs per the revised guidelines, tAs per the revised guidelines, the Pattern of financial assistance :he Pattern of financial assistance :he Pattern of financial assistance :he Pattern of financial assistance :

“ The central assistance (subsidy) will be restricted to 50% of the total “ The central assistance (subsidy) will be restricted to 50% of the total “ The central assistance (subsidy) will be restricted to 50% of the total “ The central assistance (subsidy) will be restricted to 50% of the total

project cost. The ratio proposed respect of central share : state share: project cost. The ratio proposed respect of central share : state share: project cost. The ratio proposed respect of central share : state share: project cost. The ratio proposed respect of central share : state share:

project proponents share will be 50:25:25. out of the proponents share at project proponents share will be 50:25:25. out of the proponents share at project proponents share will be 50:25:25. out of the proponents share at project proponents share will be 50:25:25. out of the proponents share at

least 40% of contribution has to be from the proponent and balance 60% is least 40% of contribution has to be from the proponent and balance 60% is least 40% of contribution has to be from the proponent and balance 60% is least 40% of contribution has to be from the proponent and balance 60% is

to be raised through loan to the proponents from bank/financial to be raised through loan to the proponents from bank/financial to be raised through loan to the proponents from bank/financial to be raised through loan to the proponents from bank/financial

institutions.”institutions.”institutions.”institutions.”

ContdContdContdContd….….….….

Page 4

� ForForForFor CETPsCETPsCETPsCETPs involvinginvolvinginvolvinginvolving primary/primary/primary/primary/ SecondarySecondarySecondarySecondary //// tertiarytertiarytertiarytertiary treatment,treatment,treatment,treatment, financialfinancialfinancialfinancial

assistanceassistanceassistanceassistance wouldwouldwouldwould bebebebe providedprovidedprovidedprovided bybybyby GOIGOIGOIGOI totototo thethethethe tunetunetunetune ofofofof 50505050%%%% ofofofof maximummaximummaximummaximum RsRsRsRs....1111....50505050

CrCrCrCr..../MLD/MLD/MLD/MLD capacity,capacity,capacity,capacity, subjectsubjectsubjectsubject totototo aaaa ceilingceilingceilingceiling ofofofof CentralCentralCentralCentral assistanceassistanceassistanceassistance ofofofof RsRsRsRs....15151515 CrCrCrCr.... PerPerPerPer

CETPCETPCETPCETP

� ForForForFor CETPsCETPsCETPsCETPs involvinginvolvinginvolvinginvolving primaryprimaryprimaryprimary //// secondarysecondarysecondarysecondary //// tertiarytertiarytertiarytertiary treatmenttreatmenttreatmenttreatment andandandand ZLDZLDZLDZLD

treatmenttreatmenttreatmenttreatment financialfinancialfinancialfinancial assistanceassistanceassistanceassistance wouldwouldwouldwould bebebebe providedprovidedprovidedprovided bybybyby GOIGOIGOIGOI totototo thethethethe tunetunetunetune ofofofof 50505050%%%% ofofofof

maximummaximummaximummaximum RsRsRsRs....4444....50505050 CrCrCrCr..../MLD/MLD/MLD/MLD capacity,capacity,capacity,capacity, subjectsubjectsubjectsubject totototo aaaa ceilingceilingceilingceiling ofofofof centralcentralcentralcentral assistanceassistanceassistanceassistance

ofofofof RsRsRsRs....20202020 CrCrCrCr....perperperper CETPCETPCETPCETP....

Page 519/11/2012

APIICAPIICAPIICAPIICAPIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC takingtakingtakingtakingtakingtakingtakingtaking proactiveproactiveproactiveproactiveproactiveproactiveproactiveproactive measuresmeasuresmeasuresmeasuresmeasuresmeasuresmeasuresmeasures onononononononon thethethethethethethethe followingfollowingfollowingfollowingfollowingfollowingfollowingfollowing frontsfrontsfrontsfrontsfrontsfrontsfrontsfronts::::::::

�InitiationInitiationInitiationInitiation ofofofof CETP/STPCETP/STPCETP/STPCETP/STP proposalsproposalsproposalsproposals inininin thethethethe existingexistingexistingexisting IndustrialIndustrialIndustrialIndustrial ParksParksParksParks asasasas

wellwellwellwell asasasas inininin newnewnewnew IndustrialIndustrialIndustrialIndustrial ParksParksParksParks onononon needneedneedneed basisbasisbasisbasis....

�EarmarkingEarmarkingEarmarkingEarmarking ofofofof requiredrequiredrequiredrequired landlandlandland forforforfor CETP/STPCETP/STPCETP/STPCETP/STP underunderunderunder commoncommoncommoncommon

amenitiesamenitiesamenitiesamenities onononon leaseleaseleaselease basisbasisbasisbasis atatatat nominalnominalnominalnominal leaseleaseleaselease rentalsrentalsrentalsrentals

�FacilitatingFacilitatingFacilitatingFacilitating totototo taptaptaptap thethethethe fundsfundsfundsfunds forforforfor CETPs/STPsCETPs/STPsCETPs/STPsCETPs/STPs underunderunderunder variousvariousvariousvarious schemesschemesschemesschemes

ofofofof bothbothbothboth CentralCentralCentralCentral andandandand StateStateStateState GovernmentsGovernmentsGovernmentsGovernments andandandand suchsuchsuchsuch otherotherotherother proactiveproactiveproactiveproactive

measuresmeasuresmeasuresmeasures fromfromfromfrom APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC sidesidesideside

�FacilitatingFacilitatingFacilitatingFacilitating industryindustryindustryindustry membersmembersmembersmembers ofofofof respectiverespectiverespectiverespective IP’sIP’sIP’sIP’s andandandand APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC IALAsIALAsIALAsIALAs inininin

implementingimplementingimplementingimplementing CETPCETPCETPCETP schemesschemesschemesschemes forforforfor theirtheirtheirtheir construction,construction,construction,construction, operationoperationoperationoperation andandandand

subsequentsubsequentsubsequentsubsequent maintenancemaintenancemaintenancemaintenance successfullysuccessfullysuccessfullysuccessfully....

Page 619/11/2012

Support services from APIIC for Brown field Industrial Parks Support services from APIIC for Brown field Industrial Parks Support services from APIIC for Brown field Industrial Parks Support services from APIIC for Brown field Industrial Parks Support services from APIIC for Brown field Industrial Parks Support services from APIIC for Brown field Industrial Parks Support services from APIIC for Brown field Industrial Parks Support services from APIIC for Brown field Industrial Parks (Existing Industrial Parks).(Existing Industrial Parks).(Existing Industrial Parks).(Existing Industrial Parks).(Existing Industrial Parks).(Existing Industrial Parks).(Existing Industrial Parks).(Existing Industrial Parks).

� APIIC will act as a facilitator for promoting CETPs in APIIC Industrial Parks for APIIC will act as a facilitator for promoting CETPs in APIIC Industrial Parks for APIIC will act as a facilitator for promoting CETPs in APIIC Industrial Parks for APIIC will act as a facilitator for promoting CETPs in APIIC Industrial Parks for

ensuring improvement of the environmental conditions with reference to waste ensuring improvement of the environmental conditions with reference to waste ensuring improvement of the environmental conditions with reference to waste ensuring improvement of the environmental conditions with reference to waste

water and related pollution problems.water and related pollution problems.water and related pollution problems.water and related pollution problems.

� APIIC will facilitate formation of SPV/JV company by member industries of the APIIC will facilitate formation of SPV/JV company by member industries of the APIIC will facilitate formation of SPV/JV company by member industries of the APIIC will facilitate formation of SPV/JV company by member industries of the

APIIC Industrial Park under an appropriate statute, preferably as a notAPIIC Industrial Park under an appropriate statute, preferably as a notAPIIC Industrial Park under an appropriate statute, preferably as a notAPIIC Industrial Park under an appropriate statute, preferably as a not----forforforfor----profit profit profit profit

company under Section 25 of the Companies Act.company under Section 25 of the Companies Act.company under Section 25 of the Companies Act.company under Section 25 of the Companies Act.

� APIIC will enter into legally binding Agreement with SPV clearly delineating their APIIC will enter into legally binding Agreement with SPV clearly delineating their APIIC will enter into legally binding Agreement with SPV clearly delineating their APIIC will enter into legally binding Agreement with SPV clearly delineating their

relationship and mutual obligations, and defining the roles and responsibilities of relationship and mutual obligations, and defining the roles and responsibilities of relationship and mutual obligations, and defining the roles and responsibilities of relationship and mutual obligations, and defining the roles and responsibilities of

each of the parties. each of the parties. each of the parties. each of the parties.

� APIIC’s representative will be a “Special Invitee” to the meetings of the Board of APIIC’s representative will be a “Special Invitee” to the meetings of the Board of APIIC’s representative will be a “Special Invitee” to the meetings of the Board of APIIC’s representative will be a “Special Invitee” to the meetings of the Board of

SPV/JV, for providing any advisory inputs and playing facilitator role.SPV/JV, for providing any advisory inputs and playing facilitator role.SPV/JV, for providing any advisory inputs and playing facilitator role.SPV/JV, for providing any advisory inputs and playing facilitator role.

ContdContdContdContd….….….….

2

Page 7

�APIIC, through the Industrial Area Local Authority (IALA) will facilitate the laying APIIC, through the Industrial Area Local Authority (IALA) will facilitate the laying APIIC, through the Industrial Area Local Authority (IALA) will facilitate the laying APIIC, through the Industrial Area Local Authority (IALA) will facilitate the laying

pipeline/sewer line from individual industries to CETP. Laying of pipeline or sewer pipeline/sewer line from individual industries to CETP. Laying of pipeline or sewer pipeline/sewer line from individual industries to CETP. Laying of pipeline or sewer pipeline/sewer line from individual industries to CETP. Laying of pipeline or sewer

line from CETP/Guard Pond to final point of disposal shall be the responsibility of line from CETP/Guard Pond to final point of disposal shall be the responsibility of line from CETP/Guard Pond to final point of disposal shall be the responsibility of line from CETP/Guard Pond to final point of disposal shall be the responsibility of

SPV/JV/Operator.SPV/JV/Operator.SPV/JV/Operator.SPV/JV/Operator.

�APIIC will facilitate the SPV in finalizing the bidding process for CETP Operator/JV APIIC will facilitate the SPV in finalizing the bidding process for CETP Operator/JV APIIC will facilitate the SPV in finalizing the bidding process for CETP Operator/JV APIIC will facilitate the SPV in finalizing the bidding process for CETP Operator/JV

partner.partner.partner.partner.

�APIIC will consider, wherever possible, providing technical advisory services to SPV APIIC will consider, wherever possible, providing technical advisory services to SPV APIIC will consider, wherever possible, providing technical advisory services to SPV APIIC will consider, wherever possible, providing technical advisory services to SPV

in cooperation with GIZ (German International Cooperation) under the Indo German in cooperation with GIZ (German International Cooperation) under the Indo German in cooperation with GIZ (German International Cooperation) under the Indo German in cooperation with GIZ (German International Cooperation) under the Indo German

Development Cooperation.Development Cooperation.Development Cooperation.Development Cooperation.

�APIIC will facilitate in obtaining grant support from MoEF and the Government of APIIC will facilitate in obtaining grant support from MoEF and the Government of APIIC will facilitate in obtaining grant support from MoEF and the Government of APIIC will facilitate in obtaining grant support from MoEF and the Government of

Andhra Pradesh under the CETP Scheme of MoEF or any other such eligible Andhra Pradesh under the CETP Scheme of MoEF or any other such eligible Andhra Pradesh under the CETP Scheme of MoEF or any other such eligible Andhra Pradesh under the CETP Scheme of MoEF or any other such eligible

schemes.schemes.schemes.schemes.

Contd….Contd….Contd….Contd….

Page 819/11/2012

�APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC willwillwillwill provideprovideprovideprovide financialfinancialfinancialfinancial assistanceassistanceassistanceassistance similarsimilarsimilarsimilar totototo viabilityviabilityviabilityviability gapgapgapgap fundingfundingfundingfunding likelikelikelike

arrangement/loanarrangement/loanarrangement/loanarrangement/loan arrangementarrangementarrangementarrangement totototo SPV/JVSPV/JVSPV/JVSPV/JV dulydulydulyduly examiningexaminingexaminingexamining eacheacheacheach ofofofof suchsuchsuchsuch projectprojectprojectproject onononon casecasecasecase

totototo casecasecasecase basisbasisbasisbasis andandandand totototo thethethethe extentextentextentextent possiblepossiblepossiblepossible totototo APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC....

�APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC willwillwillwill taketaketaketake necessarynecessarynecessarynecessary stepsstepsstepssteps totototo constituteconstituteconstituteconstitute aaaa “Tariff“Tariff“Tariff“Tariff Committee”,Committee”,Committee”,Committee”, inininin consultationconsultationconsultationconsultation

withwithwithwith thethethethe SPV/JVSPV/JVSPV/JVSPV/JV andandandand thethethethe CETPCETPCETPCETP Operator,Operator,Operator,Operator, forforforfor determiningdeterminingdeterminingdetermining andandandand amendingamendingamendingamending fromfromfromfrom timetimetimetime totototo

time,time,time,time, asasasas maymaymaymay bebebebe necessary,necessary,necessary,necessary, thethethethe tarifftarifftarifftariff orororor useruseruseruser chargeschargeschargescharges totototo bebebebe paidpaidpaidpaid bybybyby membermembermembermember industriesindustriesindustriesindustries

forforforfor treatmenttreatmenttreatmenttreatment ofofofof theirtheirtheirtheir wastewastewastewaste water,water,water,water, andandandand totototo bebebebe collectedcollectedcollectedcollected bybybyby thethethethe SPV/JVSPV/JVSPV/JVSPV/JV andandandand inininin turnturnturnturn totototo bebebebe

paidpaidpaidpaid totototo thethethethe CETPCETPCETPCETP OperatorOperatorOperatorOperator....

�APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC willwillwillwill actactactact asasasas anananan AppellateAppellateAppellateAppellate AuthorityAuthorityAuthorityAuthority forforforfor anyanyanyany disputedisputedisputedispute arisingarisingarisingarising betweenbetweenbetweenbetween SPVSPVSPVSPV andandandand

CETPCETPCETPCETP Operator/JVOperator/JVOperator/JVOperator/JV....


Page 919/11/2012

Support services from APIIC for Green field Industrial parks Support services from APIIC for Green field Industrial parks Support services from APIIC for Green field Industrial parks Support services from APIIC for Green field Industrial parks Support services from APIIC for Green field Industrial parks Support services from APIIC for Green field Industrial parks Support services from APIIC for Green field Industrial parks Support services from APIIC for Green field Industrial parks

(New Industrial Parks).(New Industrial Parks).(New Industrial Parks).(New Industrial Parks).(New Industrial Parks).(New Industrial Parks).(New Industrial Parks).(New Industrial Parks).

�APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC willwillwillwill taketaketaketake upupupup andandandand developdevelopdevelopdevelop CETP/STPCETP/STPCETP/STPCETP/STP requiredrequiredrequiredrequired forforforfor thethethethe industrialindustrialindustrialindustrial ParkParkParkPark

includingincludingincludingincluding pipepipepipepipe lineslineslineslines forforforfor conveyanceconveyanceconveyanceconveyance ofofofof effluents,effluents,effluents,effluents, guardguardguardguard ponds,ponds,ponds,ponds, pumpingpumpingpumpingpumping stationsstationsstationsstations

andandandand disposaldisposaldisposaldisposal pipelinespipelinespipelinespipelines forforforfor treatedtreatedtreatedtreated effluentseffluentseffluentseffluents etcetcetcetc.... dulydulydulyduly chargingchargingchargingcharging thethethethe capitalcapitalcapitalcapital costcostcostcost onononon

totototo thethethethe overalloveralloveralloverall landlandlandland developmentdevelopmentdevelopmentdevelopment costcostcostcost ofofofof thethethethe IndustrialIndustrialIndustrialIndustrial ParkParkParkPark....

�APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC willwillwillwill taptaptaptap thethethethe fundsfundsfundsfunds totototo thethethethe extentextentextentextent availableavailableavailableavailable fromfromfromfrom anyanyanyany ofofofof thethethethe CentralCentralCentralCentral /State/State/State/State

GovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernment schemesschemesschemesschemes.... APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC willwillwillwill alsoalsoalsoalso provideprovideprovideprovide financialfinancialfinancialfinancial assistanceassistanceassistanceassistance similarsimilarsimilarsimilar totototo

viabilityviabilityviabilityviability gapgapgapgap fundingfundingfundingfunding likelikelikelike arrangementarrangementarrangementarrangement //// LoanLoanLoanLoan arrangementarrangementarrangementarrangement totototo SPVSPVSPVSPV dulydulydulyduly

examiningexaminingexaminingexamining eacheacheacheach ofofofof suchsuchsuchsuch projectprojectprojectproject onononon casecasecasecase totototo casecasecasecase basisbasisbasisbasis andandandand totototo thethethethe extentextentextentextent possiblepossiblepossiblepossible totototo

APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC....

Contd….Contd….Contd….Contd…. Page 10

�APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC----IALAIALAIALAIALA willwillwillwill taketaketaketake upupupup operationoperationoperationoperation andandandand maintenancesmaintenancesmaintenancesmaintenances ofofofof thethethethe facilityfacilityfacilityfacility untiluntiluntiluntil aaaa SPVSPVSPVSPV

isisisis formedformedformedformed soonsoonsoonsoon afterafterafterafter 80808080%%%% ofofofof occupancyoccupancyoccupancyoccupancy isisisis achievedachievedachievedachieved....

�APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC willwillwillwill facilitatefacilitatefacilitatefacilitate APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC----IALAIALAIALAIALA inininin finalizingfinalizingfinalizingfinalizing thethethethe bindingbindingbindingbinding processprocessprocessprocess forforforfor

CETP/STPCETP/STPCETP/STPCETP/STP operator,operator,operator,operator, constitutingconstitutingconstitutingconstituting “Tariff“Tariff“Tariff“Tariff Committee”Committee”Committee”Committee” forforforfor determiningdeterminingdeterminingdetermining andandandand

amendingamendingamendingamending fromfromfromfrom timetimetimetime totototo time,time,time,time, asasasas maymaymaymay bebebebe necessarynecessarynecessarynecessary thethethethe tarifftarifftarifftariff orororor useruseruseruser chargeschargeschargescharges totototo bebebebe

paidpaidpaidpaid bybybyby membermembermembermember industriesindustriesindustriesindustries forforforfor treatmenttreatmenttreatmenttreatment ofofofof theirtheirtheirtheir wastewater,wastewater,wastewater,wastewater, andandandand totototo bebebebe collectedcollectedcollectedcollected

bybybyby APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC----IALAIALAIALAIALA andandandand inininin turnturnturnturn totototo bebebebe paidpaidpaidpaid totototo thethethethe CETPCETPCETPCETP operatoroperatoroperatoroperator....


Page 1119/11/2012

�APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC willwillwillwill facilitatefacilitatefacilitatefacilitate formationformationformationformation ofofofof SPV/JVSPV/JVSPV/JVSPV/JV companycompanycompanycompany bybybyby membermembermembermember industriesindustriesindustriesindustries ofofofof thethethethe

APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC IPIPIPIP underunderunderunder andandandand appropriateappropriateappropriateappropriate statute,statute,statute,statute, preferablypreferablypreferablypreferably asasasas aaaa notnotnotnot aaaa profitprofitprofitprofit companycompanycompanycompany

underunderunderunder sectionsectionsectionsection 25252525 ofofofof thethethethe companiescompaniescompaniescompanies actactactact soonsoonsoonsoon afterafterafterafter 80808080%%%% ofofofof thethethethe occupancyoccupancyoccupancyoccupancy isisisis

achievedachievedachievedachieved inininin thethethethe respectiverespectiverespectiverespective IP’sIP’sIP’sIP’s.... TheTheTheThe rolerolerolerole ofofofof APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC----IALAIALAIALAIALA inininin maintainingmaintainingmaintainingmaintaining

CETP/STPCETP/STPCETP/STPCETP/STP ceasesceasesceasesceases soonsoonsoonsoon afterafterafterafter SPV/JVSPV/JVSPV/JVSPV/JV isisisis formedformedformedformed....

�APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC willwillwillwill enterenterenterenter intointointointo legallegallegallegal bindingbindingbindingbinding agreementagreementagreementagreement withwithwithwith SPVSPVSPVSPV clearlyclearlyclearlyclearly delineatingdelineatingdelineatingdelineating theirtheirtheirtheir

relationshiprelationshiprelationshiprelationship andandandand mutualmutualmutualmutual obligationsobligationsobligationsobligations andandandand definingdefiningdefiningdefining thethethethe rolesrolesrolesroles andandandand responsibilitiesresponsibilitiesresponsibilitiesresponsibilities ofofofof

eacheacheacheach ofofofof thethethethe partiespartiespartiesparties....

�APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC representativesrepresentativesrepresentativesrepresentatives willwillwillwill bebebebe aaaa “Special“Special“Special“Special Invite”Invite”Invite”Invite” totototo thethethethe boardboardboardboard meetingsmeetingsmeetingsmeetings ofofofof SPV/JVSPV/JVSPV/JVSPV/JV

forforforfor providingprovidingprovidingproviding anyanyanyany advisoryadvisoryadvisoryadvisory inputsinputsinputsinputs andandandand playingplayingplayingplaying facilitatorfacilitatorfacilitatorfacilitator rolerolerolerole....

�APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC willwillwillwill facilitatefacilitatefacilitatefacilitate thethethethe SPVSPVSPVSPV inininin finalizingfinalizingfinalizingfinalizing thethethethe biddingbiddingbiddingbidding processprocessprocessprocess forforforfor CETPCETPCETPCETP

operator/JVoperator/JVoperator/JVoperator/JV partnerpartnerpartnerpartner....


Page 1219/11/2012

�APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC willwillwillwill considerconsiderconsiderconsider whereverwhereverwhereverwherever possiblepossiblepossiblepossible providingprovidingprovidingproviding technicaltechnicaltechnicaltechnical advisoryadvisoryadvisoryadvisory servicesservicesservicesservices totototo

SPVSPVSPVSPV inininin cooperationcooperationcooperationcooperation withwithwithwith GIZGIZGIZGIZ underunderunderunder IndoIndoIndoIndo----GermanGermanGermanGerman developmentdevelopmentdevelopmentdevelopment CooperationCooperationCooperationCooperation....

�APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC willwillwillwill facilitatefacilitatefacilitatefacilitate inininin obtainingobtainingobtainingobtaining grant/supportgrant/supportgrant/supportgrant/support fromfromfromfrom MOEFMOEFMOEFMOEF andandandand GovtGovtGovtGovt.... ofofofof APAPAPAP

underunderunderunder CETPCETPCETPCETP schemeschemeschemescheme ofofofof MoEFMoEFMoEFMoEF forforforfor maintenancemaintenancemaintenancemaintenance andandandand upgradationupgradationupgradationupgradation ifififif anyanyanyany eligibleeligibleeligibleeligible....

�APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC willwillwillwill taketaketaketake necessarynecessarynecessarynecessary stepsstepsstepssteps totototo constituteconstituteconstituteconstitute aaaa “Tariff“Tariff“Tariff“Tariff Committee”,Committee”,Committee”,Committee”, inininin

consultationconsultationconsultationconsultation withwithwithwith thethethethe SPV/JVSPV/JVSPV/JVSPV/JV andandandand thethethethe CETPCETPCETPCETP Operator,Operator,Operator,Operator, forforforfor determiningdeterminingdeterminingdetermining andandandand

amendingamendingamendingamending fromfromfromfrom timetimetimetime totototo time,time,time,time, asasasas maymaymaymay bebebebe necessary,necessary,necessary,necessary, thethethethe tarifftarifftarifftariff orororor useruseruseruser chargeschargeschargescharges totototo bebebebe

paidpaidpaidpaid bybybyby membermembermembermember industriesindustriesindustriesindustries forforforfor treatmenttreatmenttreatmenttreatment ofofofof theirtheirtheirtheir wastewastewastewaste water,water,water,water, andandandand totototo bebebebe collectedcollectedcollectedcollected

bybybyby thethethethe SPV/JVSPV/JVSPV/JVSPV/JV andandandand inininin turnturnturnturn totototo bebebebe paidpaidpaidpaid totototo thethethethe CETPCETPCETPCETP OperatorOperatorOperatorOperator....

�APIICAPIICAPIICAPIIC willwillwillwill actactactact asasasas anananan AppellateAppellateAppellateAppellate AuthorityAuthorityAuthorityAuthority forforforfor anyanyanyany disputedisputedisputedispute arisingarisingarisingarising betweenbetweenbetweenbetween SPVSPVSPVSPV

andandandand CETPCETPCETPCETP Operator/JVOperator/JVOperator/JVOperator/JV....

3

Page 13

Who may Initiate the Process?Who may Initiate the Process?Who may Initiate the Process?Who may Initiate the Process?

19/11/2012

• Industrial Area Local Authorities (IALAs) of the APIIC Industrial ParksIndustrial Area Local Authorities (IALAs) of the APIIC Industrial ParksIndustrial Area Local Authorities (IALAs) of the APIIC Industrial ParksIndustrial Area Local Authorities (IALAs) of the APIIC Industrial Parks

• Industrial Associations Industrial Associations Industrial Associations Industrial Associations

• APIIC Zonal ManagersAPIIC Zonal ManagersAPIIC Zonal ManagersAPIIC Zonal Managers

• AP Pollution Control BoardAP Pollution Control BoardAP Pollution Control BoardAP Pollution Control Board

• Any other interested groupsAny other interested groupsAny other interested groupsAny other interested groups

• Proposals, with expression of interest for setting up of CETP should be submitted to the Proposals, with expression of interest for setting up of CETP should be submitted to the Proposals, with expression of interest for setting up of CETP should be submitted to the Proposals, with expression of interest for setting up of CETP should be submitted to the

EMP Cell of APIIC. EMP Cell of APIIC. EMP Cell of APIIC. EMP Cell of APIIC.

Page 14

12/15/2012

1

DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERDISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERDISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERDISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERDISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERDISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERDISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERDISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERTNPC BOARD, TIRUPPURTNPC BOARD, TIRUPPURTNPC BOARD, TIRUPPURTNPC BOARD, TIRUPPURTNPC BOARD, TIRUPPURTNPC BOARD, TIRUPPURTNPC BOARD, TIRUPPURTNPC BOARD, TIRUPPUR�� Total No. of Units Total No. of Units : 748: 748�� Closed for Not Providing ZLDS Closed for Not Providing ZLDS : 90: 90�� Members of 20 CETPs Members of 20 CETPs : 502: 502�� IETP Provided Units IETP Provided Units : 156: 156�� Dyeing Units Dyeing Units : 403 CETP MEMBERS: 403 CETP MEMBERS99 IETP units99 IETP units�� Bleaching Units Bleaching Units : 89 CETP MEMBERS: 89 CETP MEMBERS67 IETP UNITS67 IETP UNITS�� Total No. of Units Total No. of Units : 748: 748�� Closed for Not Providing ZLDS Closed for Not Providing ZLDS : 90: 90�� Members of 20 CETPs Members of 20 CETPs : 502: 502�� IETP Provided Units IETP Provided Units : 156: 156�� Dyeing Units Dyeing Units : 403 CETP MEMBERS: 403 CETP MEMBERS99 IETP units99 IETP units�� Bleaching Units Bleaching Units : 89 CETP MEMBERS: 89 CETP MEMBERS67 IETP UNITS67 IETP UNITS

No. of CETPs at No. of CETPs at TiruppurTiruppur : 20: 20No. of CETPs provided ZLDS No. of CETPs provided ZLDS : 18 : 18 No. of CETPs given Trial PermissionNo. of CETPs given Trial Permission : 15: 15No. of CETP member units given Trial Permission No. of CETP member units given Trial Permission : 405: 405No. of CETP member units now under operation No. of CETP member units now under operation : 209: 209No. of Units yet to join Trial operationNo. of Units yet to join Trial operation : 196: 196No. of IETP units given permission to operate No. of IETP units given permission to operate : 51: 51Total No. of units now under operation at Total No. of units now under operation at Total No. of units now under operation at Total No. of units now under operation at Total No. of units now under operation at Total No. of units now under operation at Total No. of units now under operation at Total No. of units now under operation at TiruppurTiruppurTiruppurTiruppurTiruppurTiruppurTiruppurTiruppur : 260: 260: 260: 260: 260: 260: 260: 260I. Primary Treatment SystemI. Primary Treatment SystemI. Primary Treatment SystemI. Primary Treatment SystemRawRawRawRaw effluenteffluenteffluenteffluent isisisis subjectedsubjectedsubjectedsubjected totototo primaryprimaryprimaryprimary treatmenttreatmenttreatmenttreatment forforforfor removalremovalremovalremoval ofofofof colourcolourcolourcolour andandandandtotototo reducereducereducereduce BOD/CODBOD/CODBOD/CODBOD/COD bybybyby physiophysiophysiophysio----chemicalchemicalchemicalchemical treatmenttreatmenttreatmenttreatment followedfollowedfollowedfollowed bybybyby biologicalbiologicalbiologicalbiologicaltreatmenttreatmenttreatmenttreatment orororor directdirectdirectdirect biologicalbiologicalbiologicalbiological treatmenttreatmenttreatmenttreatment orororor directdirectdirectdirect chlorinationchlorinationchlorinationchlorination treatmenttreatmenttreatmenttreatment....IIIIIIII.... ReverseReverseReverseReverse OsmosisOsmosisOsmosisOsmosis TreatmentTreatmentTreatmentTreatment SystemSystemSystemSystemWaterWaterWaterWater recoveryrecoveryrecoveryrecovery throughthroughthroughthrough RORORORO treatmenttreatmenttreatmenttreatment....IIIIIIIIIIII.... RORORORO RejectRejectRejectReject ManagementManagementManagementManagement SystemSystemSystemSystemRecoveryRecoveryRecoveryRecovery ofofofof brinebrinebrinebrine solutionsolutionsolutionsolution fromfromfromfrom NFNFNFNF treatmenttreatmenttreatmenttreatment (or)(or)(or)(or) recoveryrecoveryrecoveryrecovery ofofofofsaltsaltsaltsalt andandandand waterwaterwaterwater fromfromfromfrom evaporatorsevaporatorsevaporatorsevaporators andandandand residueresidueresidueresidue dischargeddischargeddischargeddischarged intointointointo SolarSolarSolarSolarEvaporationEvaporationEvaporationEvaporation panpanpanpan....

• .

Zero Liquid Discharge SystemZero Liquid Discharge System CETP ComponentsCETP Components

12/15/2012

2

Improvement WorksImprovement Works Sl. No.Sl. No.Sl. No.Sl. No.Sl. No.Sl. No.Sl. No.Sl. No. Name of the IndustriesName of the IndustriesName of the IndustriesName of the IndustriesName of the IndustriesName of the IndustriesName of the IndustriesName of the Industries Web siteWeb siteWeb siteWeb siteWeb siteWeb siteWeb siteWeb site Station IDStation IDStation IDStation IDStation IDStation IDStation IDStation ID PortPortPortPortPortPortPortPort PortPortPortPortPortPortPortPort PortPortPortPortPortPortPortPort11111111 Classic Knit ProcessorsClassic Knit ProcessorsClassic Knit ProcessorsClassic Knit ProcessorsClassic Knit ProcessorsClassic Knit ProcessorsClassic Knit ProcessorsClassic Knit Processors www.flowreadings.com/classic.aspwww.flowreadings.com/classic.aspxx 107107 11 22 3322222222 Poppy's ArtPoppy's ArtPoppy's ArtPoppy's ArtPoppy's ArtPoppy's ArtPoppy's ArtPoppy's Art www.poppysart.in/poppys.aspxwww.poppysart.in/poppys.aspx 113113 11 2233333333 Victus DyeingVictus DyeingVictus DyeingVictus DyeingVictus DyeingVictus DyeingVictus DyeingVictus Dyeing www.victusdyeings.in/victus.aspxwww.victusdyeings.in/victus.aspx 106, 126106, 126 11 2244444444 Allwin Textile Processing Allwin Textile Processing Allwin Textile Processing Allwin Textile Processing Allwin Textile Processing Allwin Textile Processing Allwin Textile Processing Allwin Textile Processing MillsMillsMillsMillsMillsMillsMillsMills www.allwintextile.in/allwin.aspxwww.allwintextile.in/allwin.aspx 112112 11 22 3355555555 Emperor Textile Pvt. Ltd.,Emperor Textile Pvt. Ltd.,Emperor Textile Pvt. Ltd.,Emperor Textile Pvt. Ltd.,Emperor Textile Pvt. Ltd.,Emperor Textile Pvt. Ltd.,Emperor Textile Pvt. Ltd.,Emperor Textile Pvt. Ltd., www.emperorzlds.comwww.emperorzlds.com adminadmin zldszlds66666666 Ess Kay Yarn DyeingEss Kay Yarn DyeingEss Kay Yarn DyeingEss Kay Yarn DyeingEss Kay Yarn DyeingEss Kay Yarn DyeingEss Kay Yarn DyeingEss Kay Yarn Dyeing www.esskayyarn.in/esskay.aspxwww.esskayyarn.in/esskay.aspx 118118 1177777777 Mercury ProcessMercury ProcessMercury ProcessMercury ProcessMercury ProcessMercury ProcessMercury ProcessMercury Process www.mercuryprocess.in/mercury.awww.mercuryprocess.in/mercury.aspxspx 114114 11 2288888888 Wagon WheelWagon WheelWagon WheelWagon WheelWagon WheelWagon WheelWagon WheelWagon Wheel www.wagonwheelzlds.comwww.wagonwheelzlds.com ZLDSZLDS wwkwzldwwkwzldss99999999 Arora & Tiruppur AroraArora & Tiruppur AroraArora & Tiruppur AroraArora & Tiruppur AroraArora & Tiruppur AroraArora & Tiruppur AroraArora & Tiruppur AroraArora & Tiruppur Arora www.scottszlds.comwww.scottszlds.com adminadmin zldszlds1010101010101010 CliftonCliftonCliftonCliftonCliftonCliftonCliftonClifton www.nectarcrafts.in/nectar.aspxwww.nectarcrafts.in/nectar.aspx 121121 11 22Online EMFM Monitoring in Dyeing UnitsOnline EMFM Monitoring in Dyeing Units

Noyyal TDS Trend at upstream and down stream

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

TD

S (

mg

/ L

)

Months

Average TDS of river Noyyal Sep 2011 to Oct 2012

( water sampled and analysed - weekly twice - by DEL , TNPCB , Tiruppur )

Agraharapudur ( Tiruppur upstream )Orathupalayam Dam ( Tiruppur down stream)

Blue line refers to the Noyyal river water Average TDS level at

Agraharapudur ( entry point into Tiruppur Dt )

Red line refers to the Noyyal river water average TDS

level at Orathupalayam dam( exit point )

12/15/2012

3

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

06.08.2007

04.02.2008

06.06.2008

13.10.2008

25.02.2009

31.08.2009

17.12.2009

17.01.2010

29.01.2010

04.02.2010

10.02.2010

16.02.2010

23.02.2010

01.03.2010

08.03.2010

12.03.2010

22.03.2010

26.03.2010

09.04.2010

28.06.2011

12.07.2011

26.07.2011

12.08.2011

26.08.2011

08.09.2011

23.09.2011

10.10.2011

28.10.2011

10.11.2011

24.11.2011

08.12.2011

22.12.2011

05.01.2012

23.01.2012

07.02.2012

20.02.2012

05.03.2012

26.03.2012

12.04.2012

26.04.2012

10.05.2012

24.05.2012

14.06.2012

28.06.2012

12.07.2012

26.07.2012

13.08.2012

03.09.2012

24.09.2012

08.10.2012

25.10.2012

mg / L ( ppm )

Dates

NOYYAL TDS at Anaipalayam , Tiruppur

( 2007 - 2012 )

TDS at Anaipalayam ( …

Before closure After

closure and operation with ZLDS

Noyyal River TDS Trend Before and After Closure

…..Thank you…..Thank you

12/15/2012

1

Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETP): EIA Process

By

Dr. M. Anji ReddyProfessor of EnvironmentJNT University HyderabadEmail: [email protected]@rediffmail.com

CII JNTUH

Date: 23-11-2012

To minimize environmental pollution due to

the small and medium scale industries.

• Cleaner production technologies

• Waste minimization methods and centers

• Collective treatment at a centralized

facility, called as the CETP : A viable

treatment solution.

• Till 1990, only one CETP at Jeedimetla,

Hyderabad

CII JNTUH

Innovative Financial Support Scheme

for CETP

• State - 25%

• Central - 25% matching grant

• Loans - 30%

• SME - 20% of the

project capital cost.

• A total of 130 CETPs

• 91 - in operation

CII JNTUH

Zone-wise Status as per MoEF

Zone Number of

CETPsNorthern Zone (UP – 3, Haryana – 1, Punjab –2, Delhi

– 10 complete, 2under construction, 3 kept in abeyance

16

Western Zone (Gujarat – 19, Maharashtra – 12) 31

Eastern Zone (WB-1) 1

Central Zone (Rajasthan – 5, MP- 1) 6

South Zone (T.N – 33, AP – 2, Karnataka – 2) 37

CII JNTUH

Advantages of CETP

• facilitates ‘economy of scale’ in waste treatment

• addresses the ‘lack of space’ issue

• homogenization of wastewater

• better hydraulic stability

• professional control

• facilitates small scale units

• eliminates multiple discharges

• recycling and reuse

• organization of treated effluent and sludgedisposal

CII JNTUH

Problems and constraints• Consistency in operation

• lack of access to – capital investments,

– working capitals,

– specialized technical skills,

– inconsistent effluent quality from member industries

• improper management of treatment units

• varied nature and scale of the industries, along with the addition of industries in a haphazard manner, without proper planning

• no provision to tackle the fluctuations in the pollution load and quantities, at individual member industries

• no separate treatment units to deal with hazardous and toxic effluents, etc.

CII JNTUH

12/15/2012

2

Influencing factors in

Planning of CETPs• categories of effluent generating member industries

• qualitative/quantitative fluctuations of effluent (equalization/ homogenization /modules)

• pre-treatment requirements

• segregation of effluent streams at individual member industry

• collection and monitoring mechanism

• treatability choice of technology and bio degradability, interferences

• mode of disposal; and

• charging system

CII JNTUH CII JNTUH

Qualitative/quantitative fluctuations

of effluent

• Quantity of effluent

• Flow rate

• Effluent characteristics

– Physical characteristics

– Chemical characteristics

CII JNTUH The basic principles of

Waste minimization

• Avoiding or eliminating the production of

waste

can be carried out by choosing an alternative

process/ advanced technologies when designing a

production unit

• Reduction and minimization of waste within

the industry

can be achieved by considering all the processes

and activities which may lead to production of

waste

CII JNTUH

Parameter Concentration

pH 5.5 - 9.0

Temperature (oC) 45.0

Oil and grease 20.0

Cyanide (as CN) 2.0

Ammoniacal nitrogen(as N) 50.0

Phenolic compounds (as C6H5OH) 5.0

Hexavalent Chromium 2.0

Total chromium 2.0

Copper 3.0

Nickel 3.0

Zinc 15.0

Lead 1.0

Arsenic 0.2

Mercury 0.01

Cadmium 1.0

Selenium 0.05

Fluoride 15.0

Boron 2.0

Radioactive Materials

Alfa emitters, Hc/ml 10-7

Beta emitters, Hc/ml 10-8

Inlet Effluent Quality Standards for CETPs (Source MoEF)

CII JNTUH

Treated Effluent Quality of Common Effluent Treatment Plant

Concentration in mg/l except pH and Temperature

S. No Parameter Into inland

Surface waters

On land for

Irrigation

Into Marine Coastal

areas

1 pH 5.5 – 9.0 5.5 – 9.0 5.5 – 9.0

2 BOD5 20oC 30 100 100

3 Oil & Grease 10 10 20

4 TemperatureoC Shall no exceed

40oC in any

section of the

stream within 15

meters

downstream

from the

effluent outlet

- 45oC at the point of

Discharge

CII JNTUH

12/15/2012

3

5 Suspended Solids 100 200 (a) For process

wastewaters -100

(b) For cooling water

effluents 10% above

total suspended

matter of effluent

cooling water

6 Dissolved Solids

(inorganic)

2100 2100 -

7 Total residual

Chlorine

1.0 - 1.0

8 Ammonical

nitrogen (as N)

50 - 50

9 Total Kjeldahl

nitrogen (as N)

100 - 100

10 Chemical Oxygen

Demand (COD)

250 - 250

CII JNTUH

11 Arsenic (as As) 0.2 0.2 0.2

12 Mercury (as Hg) 0.01 - 0.01

13 Lead (as Pb) 0.1 - 0.1

14 Cadmium (as Cd) 1.0 - 1.0

15 Total Chromium (as Cr) 2.0 2.0

16 Copper (as Cu) 3.0 3.0

17 Zinc (as Zn) 5.0 - 15

CII JNTUH

18 Selenium (as Se) 0.05 - 0.05

19 Nickel (as Ni) 3.0 - 5.0

20 Boron (as B) 2.0 2.0 -

21 Percent Sodium - 60 -

22 Cyanide (as CN) 0.2 0.2 0.2

23 Chloride (as Cl) 1000 600 -

24 Fluoride (as F) 2.0 - 15

CII JNTUH Modes of disposal

• Surface water bodies

• On land for irrigation

• Marine outfall

• Public sewers

CII JNTUH

Attributes to be considered for Cost analysis

Capital Cost

• Land

• Process know-how

• Equipment and electrical

• Civil including administrative building and process units and internal roads and / or approaches

• Stand-by DG Sets

• Piping (preferably High Density Poly Ethylene (HDPE) of suitable pressure rating)

• Instrumentation (plant) such as

− flow meters (at entry, to Aeration tanks and outlet)

− D.O. meters in aeration tanks

− TOC meter

− TDS meter

− VOC meter, etc., as required by SPCB

• Laboratory equipment for analysis including instrumental analysis

• Piping in the industrial estate or for tankers

CII JNTUH Operational Cost

• Power (state electricity Board and Diesel for stand-by DG Sets)

• Fresh drinking water / bore water for chemical solution preparation

• Transportation charges of effluent if planned to collect by gravity after collection of

• sample and analysis or road tankers

• Sewage water charges (if provided)

• Plant maintenance and repairs

− Mechanical

− Electrical

− Instruments

• Sludge disposal charges

• Laboratory chemicals and glassware

• Plant process chemicals (consumables) like lime, alum, poly electrolyte, etc.

• Effluent and sludge analysis charges by external agency once in 6 months by a MoEF approved laboratory for comparison with in-house analysis

• Electrical spares

• Mechanical spares

• Consultancy charges (if required)

• R&D activity expenditure

CII JNTUH

12/15/2012

4

Administrative and others

• Salaries and benefits

• Overtime

• Auditors charges

• Bonus, medical and other benefits

CII JNTUH

Water Treatment : 5 steps• Segregation at source of generation.

• Preliminary treatment - It involves a number of unit processes to eliminate undesirable characteristics of wastewater. Processes include use of screen,

grit chambers for removal of sand and large particles, communitors for grinding of coarse solids, pre-aeration for odour control and removal of oil

and grease.

• Primary treatment- It involves removal of settable solids prior to biological

treatment. The general treatment units include: flash mixer + flocculator + sedimentation

• Secondary treatment- It involves purification of wastewater primarily with dissolved organic matter by microbial action. A number of processes are

available but the ones that are mainly used are anaerobic and /or aerobic treatment methods.

• Tertiary treatment - This mainly includes physical and chemical treatment processes that can be used after the biological treatment to meet the

treatment objectives.

CII JNTUH

““““E I A PROCESSEnvironmental impact assessment (EIA) is a

comprehensive and systematic process designed to

identify, analyze and evaluate the environmental effects

of proposed projects. It:

• involves the public in an open and participatory manner

• allows for the effective integration of environmental

considerations and public concerns into decision-

making

• is a powerful tool to help decision-makers achieve the

goal of sustainable development””””CII JNTUH

� EIA as a Regulatory tool in integratingEnvironmental concerns in economic developmentprocess� EIA was made mandatory as per MoEF notificationJanuary-1994� Revised notification: September 14th, 2006 withstructural changes under environmental protectionAct.(1986)� It should be noted that the inclusion of climatechange into the EIA process requires no change to theessential steps or sequence of the process

CII JNTUH

TENETS OF EIA NOTIFICATION 2006

�Prior EC based on pollution potential instead ofinvestment criteria

�Decentralization of clearing powers to the state / UTlevel authorities

�Quicker transparent and effective mechanism of ECcertificate

�Based on technical and operational issues

CII JNTUH

It is necessary to understand the links between environments and development in order to make

development choices that will be

�Economically efficient�socially equitable and responsible and�environmentally sound

SustainableDevelopment

SocialDevelopment

Economic Development

EnvironmentalDevelopment

EQUITABLEBEARABLE

components of sustainable development

CII JNTUH

12/15/2012

5

OBJECTIVES OF EIA(as per MoEF notification 2006)

�To ensure environmental considerations are explicitly addressed and

incorporated into the development decision-making process

� To anticipate and avoid, minimize or offset the adverse significant

biophysical, social and other relevant effects of development proposals

�To protect the productivity and capacity of natural systems and the

ecological processes which maintain their functions; and

�To promote development that is sustainable and optimize resource use and

management opportunities

CII JNTUH

As per MoEF guidelines and EIA notification 2006 Govt. of India,

has grouped all the new industries into 8 sectors

1. Mining, extraction of natural resources and power generation2. Primary processing3. Materials production4. Materials processing5. Manufacturing / fabrication 6. Service sector7. Physical infrastructure including environmental service8. Building/ construction projects/ area development projects and townships

CII JNTUH

As per MoEF guidelines and EIA notification 2006 Govt. of India,

has constituted a Central Expert Appraisal Committee (CEAC) and

Central Environmental Impact Assessment Authority (CEIAA) to

evaluate

All ‘‘‘‘A – Category’’’’ projects : EAC and EIAAAll ‘‘‘‘B – Category’’’’ :SEAC’’’’S and SEIAA

CII JNTUH

CII JNTUH

CII JNTUH

12/15/2012

6

CII JNTUH

CII JNTUH CII JNTUH

CII JNTUH CII JNTUH

12/15/2012

7

Whether any new project/expansion/modernization falls

under the preview of

NO

YES

categoryCategory Category A or

Submission of applicationBy proponent

Submission of applicationBy proponent

Scrutiny by EAC for Scrutiny by EAC for Category

Rejection

Communication of TORS to theProponent for EIA preparation

Communication of TORS to theProponent for EIA preparation

Submission of draft EIA /request for public hearing

Submission of draft EIA /request for public hearing

Conducting public hearing SPCB / PCC

Submission of proceedings of the public hearing by the SPCB / PCC

To EIAA/ SEIAA and project proponent

No Environmental

clearance required

Submission of the final EIA by the proponent after improving EIA/EMP

S

C

R

E

S

C

O

Public

Consult

Category

Cont…..

90

Period for Conducting

EIA

15

Period for ImprovingEIA/EMP

Proposed EnvironmentalOperational Mechanism

Appraisal by EAC Appraisal by SEAC

DecisionDecision

Clear Clear

Issuing clearance to Reservation

Reservation on the proposal

Conveyed to EAC

Reservation on the proposal

Conveyed to SEAC

EIA Views in reservation

Sent to EIAA

SEAC views on reservation

sent to SEIAA

DecisionDecision

Cleared Cleared

Inform project proponent

A

P

P

R

Rejection Rejection

60

60

120 days

CII JNTUH

10 Activity Model in EIA study

• Project Description and Need (PDN)

• Pertinent Institutional Information (PII)

• Identification of Potential Impacts (IPI)

• Description of Effected Environment (DEE)

• Impact Prediction (IP)

• Impact Assessment (IA)

• Impact Mitigation IM)

• Selecting the Proposed Action (SPA)

• Preparing the Written Documentation (PWD)

• Environmental Monitoring and Management Plan (EM and MP)

CII JNTUH Terms of Reference for CETP (MoEF, 2010)

• Executive summary of the project – giving a

prima facie idea of the objectives of the proposal,

use of resources, justification, etc. In addition, it

should provide a compilation of EIA report,

including EMP and post project monitoring plan

in brief.

• Justification for selecting the proposed unit size.

• Land requirement for the project including its

break up for various purposes, its availability and

optimization.

CII JNTUH

TOR continued.

• Details of proposed layout clearly demarcating variousunits/industries within the plant.

• Complete process flow diagram describing each unit,its processes and operations, along with material andenergy inputs and outputs (material and energybalance).

• Details of the industries for which CETP facility isproposed including raw materials used and productsmanufactured.

• Expected quantity of wastewater from each industryand justification for selecting the proposed capacity ofthe treatment plant/modules.

• Characteristics of effluent and proposed segregation of streams, if any, from individual member industries.

• Details of mode of effluent collection systemeither by tankers and/or pipeline, etc., orproposed trouble-shooting mechanism.

• Monitoring protocol in case of collection ofeffluent through pipeline and/or tankers.

• Details on physical, chemical and biologicalcharacteristics of the combined effluent andits concentrations and the basis for the same.

• Details of equalization tank at least for 24 hrs;and guard ponds for holding treatedwastewater or continuous monitoringfacilities, if any.

TOR continued.

12/15/2012

8

• Details of the proposed treatment schemes supportedby the treatability studies including source separationof streams for specific mode of collection andtreatment either at individual industry or at CETP(based on economic and operational easeconsiderations).

• Built-in flexibility provisions to deal with quantitativeand qualitative fluctuations.

• Organizational setup for collection of pretreatedeffluents, treatment and disposal of the treatedeffluents, etc. and deployment of qualified/skilled manpower.

• Details of O&M for maximum utilization of thedesigned capacity of the plant.

TOR continued.

CII JNTUH

• Proposed monitoring protocol for stage-wise quality control w.r.t. various characteristics and maintenance schedules followed for all rotating equipment including lubricating/oil fill, operational chemicals and laboratory chemicals.

• For any sensitive environmental parameters such as heavy metals, fluorides, etc.,

• details on improved material of construction of tanks and other equipments such as

• corrosion resistance, allowance, etc.

TOR continued.

• Details of power consumption and stand-by arrangementslike the diesel generator (DG) sets, dual fuel (gas and oil) foruninterrupted operation of treatment plant.

• Protocol and mechanism to accept the effluent by tankersonly during day time, including the adequacy of thereceiving/holding tanks, etc.

• Impact of the project on local infrastructure of the studyarea such as road network, etc. If the study area requiresany additional infrastructure, details of the agencyresponsible for the same should be included along with thetime frame. Details of the permission from the competentAuthority for conveyor belt crossing the village road.

• If the ultimate disposal is through a marine outfall thenpreliminary design of the outfall with estimated initialdilution.

• Details of laboratory, workshop, database, library, waste exchange centers, etc. in CETP.

TOR continued.

• Availability of the land for proposed treatment for ultimate capacity and to accommodate required greenbelt development.

• Details of the proposed methods of water conservation and recharging.

• Management plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal.

• Detailed plan of treated wastewater disposal/ reuse/ utilization / management.

• Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel storage, restroom, etc. to the workers during construction and operation phase.

TOR continued.

CII JNTUH

• In case of expansion of existing industries,remediation measures adopted to restore theenvironmental quality if the groundwater, soil,crop, air, etc., are affected and a detailedcompliance to the prior environmentalclearance/consent conditions.

• Details on equity by the member industries/nonrefundable membership fee to ensure continuityof membership and financial model, etc.

• Any litigation pending against the project and /orany direction /order passed by any Court of Lawrelated to the environmental pollution andimpacts in the last two years, if so, detailsthereof.

TOR continued.

CII JNTUH

Description of the environment

• The study area shall be up to a distance of 5 km from the boundary of the proposed site and all along the collection network/route map of tanker movement, treated wastewater carrying pipe-line and the receiving environment at the point of disposal.

• Location of the project site and nearest habitats with distances from the project site to be demarcated on a toposheet (1: 50000 scale).

• Landuse based on satellite imagery including location specific sensitivities such as national parks / wildlife sanctuary, villages, industries, etc. for the study area.

• Demography details of all the villages falling within the study area.

• Topography details of the project area.

TOR continued.

CII JNTUH

12/15/2012

9

• The baseline data to be collected from the study area w.r.t.different components of environment viz. air, noise, water,land, and biology and socio-economic (please refer Section4.4.2 for guidance for assessment of baseline componentsand identify attributes of concern). Actual monitoring ofbaseline environmental components shall be strictlyaccording to the parameters prescribed in the ToR afterconsidering the proposed coverage of parameters by theproponent in draft ToR and shall commence afterfinalization of ToR by the competent Authority.

• Geological features and geo-hydrological status of the studyarea.

• Surface water quality of nearby water sources and othersurface drains.

• Details on ground water quality.

TOR continued.

CII JNTUH

• Details on water quality parameters such as pH,Temperature (oC), Oil and grease, Cyanide* (as CN),Ammoniacal nitrogen* (as N), Phenolic compounds* (asC6H5OH), Hexavalent Chromium*, Total chromium*,Copper*, Nickel*, Lead*, Arsenic*, Mercury*, Cadmium*,Selenium*, Fluoride*, Boron*, Radioactive materials*, Alfaemitters*, Hc/ml,Beta emitters*, Hc/ml*, etc. (* - asapplicable).

• Details on existing ambient air quality and expected, stackand fugitive emissions for PM10, PM2.5, SO2*, NOx*,VOCs*, carbon oxides (CO and CO2) etc., and evaluation ofthe adequacy of the proposed pollution control devices tomeet standards for point sources and to meet AAQstandards. (* - As applicable)

• The air quality contours may be plotted on a location mapshowing the location of project site, habitation nearby,sensitive receptors, if any and wind roses.

TOR continued.

• Details on noise levels at sensitive/commercial receptors.

• Site-specific micro-meteorological data including mixing height.

• One season site-specific data excluding monsoon season.

• Proposed baseline monitoring network for the consideration and approval of the Competent Authority.

• Ecological status (terrestrial and aquatic) of the study area such as habitat type and quality, species, diversity, rarity, fragmentation, ecological linkage, age, abundance,etc.

TOR continued.

• If any incompatible landuse attributes fall within

a 5 km radius of the project boundary, proponent

shall describe the sensitivity (distance, area and

significance) and propose the additional points

based on significance for review and acceptance

by the EAC/SEAC. Incompatible landuse attributes

include:

− Public water supply areas from rivers/surface

water bodies, from ground water

− Scenic areas/tourism areas/hill resorts

− Religious places, pilgrim centers that attract

over 10 lakh pilgrims a year

TOR continued.

− Protected tribal settlements (notified tribal areaswhere industrial activity is not permitted)

− CRZ

− Monuments of national significance, WorldHeritage Sites

− Cyclone, Tsunami-prone areas (based on last 25years)

− Airport areas

− Any other feature as specified by the State or localgovernment and other features as locallyapplicable, including prime agricultural lands,pastures, migratory corridors, etc.

TOR continued.

CII JNTUH

• If ecologically sensitive attributes fall within a 5 km radiusof the project boundary, proponent shall describe thesensitivity (distance, area and significance) and propose theadditional points based on significance for review andacceptance by the EAC/SEAC. Ecological sensitive attributesinclude:

− National parks

− Wild life sanctuaries, Game reserve

− Tiger reserve/elephant reserve/turtle nesting ground

− Mangrove area

− Wetlands

− Reserved and Protected forests, etc.

− Any other closed/protected area under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, any other area locally applicable

• If the location falls in a valley, studies on specific issues connected to the natural resources management

TOR continued.

12/15/2012

10

• Identification of CRZ area: A CRZ map duly authenticated by one of the authorized agencies demarcating LTL(Low Tide Level), HTL (High Tide Level), CRZ area, location of the project and associate facilities w.r.t. CRZ, coastal features such as mangroves, if any. The route of the pipeline, etc., passing through CRZ, if any, should also be demarcated. Recommendations of the State Coastal Management Authority for the activities to be taken up in the CRZ.

• CRZ map in 1:10000 scale in general cases and in 1:5000 scale for specific observations.

• Environmental parameters – Temperature, sea level pressure, wind speed, mean relative humidity, visibility, salinity, density, rainfall, fog, frequency and intensity of cyclones, sediment transport, seismic characteristics, fresh water influx.

• Details on marine biological parameters – microbiological population, pathogenic bacteria, plankton distribution, fish spawning grounds in the adjoining waters, commercial fisheries potential, vegetation including inter tidal, flora and fauna in the marine, benthal quality assessment for biological species and heavy metals and estuarine environment.

TOR continued.

Anticipated environmental impacts and mitigation measures

• Anticipated generic environmental impacts dueto this project are indicated in Table 4-2, whichmay be evaluated for significance and based oncorresponding likely impacts VECs may beidentified. Baseline studies may be conducted forall the concerned VECs and likely impacts willhave to be assessed for their magnitude in orderto identify mitigation measures (please referChapter 4 of the manual for guidance).

• Tools as given in Section 4.4.3 may be referred forthe appropriate assessment of environmentalimpacts and same may be submitted in draft ToRfor consideration and approval by EAC/SEAC.

TOR continued.

• While identifying the likely impacts, also include the following foranalysis of significance and required mitigation measures:

− impacts due to transportation of raw materials and end productson thesurrounding environment

− impacts on surface water, soil and groundwater

− impacts due to air pollution

− impacts due to odour pollution

− impacts due to noise

− impacts due to fugitive emissions

− impact on health of workers due to proposed project activities

− Impact on the disposal mode-specific receiving environment

• Proposed odour control measures.

• Action plan for the greenbelt development – species, width ofplantations, planning schedule etc. in accordance to CPCB publishedguidelines.

• In case of likely impact from the proposed project on the surrounding reserve forests,Plan for the conservation of wild fauna in consultation with the State Forest Department.

TOR continued.

• For identifying the mitigation measures, please refer Chapter III for source control and treatment. Besides typical mitigation measures which may also be considered are discussed in Table 4-5.

• Details in case, if the effluent conveyance system uses pipe lines, details regarding minimum (one day) storage tank with mixing facility to keep it in aerobic conditions at source industry and mechanism to ensure compliance with prescribed standards at this storage tank.

• Details regarding soil and groundwater impacts and regular monitoring protocols suggested for ensuring no significant impacts, besides preventive measures.

• Impacts due to laying of pipe lines for effluent collection and for the disposal of the treated wastewaters.

• Bathymetric studies need to be conducted and models shall be applied to predict the dispersion patterns to determine the length of the outfall, if disposal is through a marine outfall.

TOR continued.

• Capital quantity of dredging material, disposal

and its impact on aquatic life.

• Details on fisheries study which are conducted

w.r.t. benthos and marine organic material

and coastal fisheries.

• Details of storm water collection network and

utilization plan, etc.

• Proposed measures for occupational safety

and health of the workers.

TOR continued.

CII JNTUH

Analysis of alternative resources and technologies

• Comparison of alternate sites considered and the reasons for selecting the proposed site. Conformity of the site with the prescribed guidelines in terms of CRZ, river, highways, railways, etc.

• Drainage area and alterations, if any due to the project.

• Details on improved technologies.

Environmental monitoring program

• Monitoring programme for pollution control at source.

• Monitoring pollutants at receiving environment for the appropriate notified parameters – air quality, groundwater, surface water, etc. during operational phase of the project.

• Specific programme to monitor safety and health protection of workers.

• Appropriate monitoring network has to be designed and proposed, to assess the possible residual impacts on VECs.

• Details of in-house monitoring capabilities and the recognized agencies if proposed for conducting monitoring.

TOR continued.

12/15/2012

11

Additional studies

• Details on risk assessment and damage control during differentphases of the project and proposed safeguard measures.

• Details on socio-economic development activities such ascommercial property values, generation of jobs, education, socialconflicts, cultural status, accidents, etc.

• Proposed plan to handle the socio-economic influence on the localcommunity. The plan should include quantitative dimension as faras possible.

• Details on compensation package for the people affected by theproject, considering the socio-economic status of the area,homestead oustees, land oustees, and landless labourers.

• Points identified in the public hearing and commitment of theproject proponent to the same. Detailed action plan addressing theissues raised, and the details of necessary allocation of funds.

TOR continued.

CII JNTUH

Environmental management plan

• Administrative and technical organizational structure to ensure proposed post-project monitoring programmefor approved mitigation measures.

• EMP devised to mitigate the adverse impacts of the project should be provided along with item-wise cost of its implementation (capital and recurring costs).

• Allocation of resources and responsibilities for plan implementation.

• Details of the emergency preparedness plan and on-site and off-site disaster management plan.

TOR continued.

CII JNTUH

CETP – at Nacharam & Mallapur

Ongoing Project(CONSTRUCTION PHASE)

ENTRANCE OF THE PLANT

(Claimed under Progress Reports 2&3)CII JNTUH

PLASTERING OF OFFICE BUILDING UNDER PROGRESS

(Claimed under Progress Reports 2&3)

CII JNTUH

PUMPS AT COLLECTION TANK(Claimed in Progress Report 3)

CII JNTUH

RAW EFFLUENT PUMPS

(Claimed in Progress Report 3)

CII JNTUH

12/15/2012

12

CII JNTUH

VIEW OF THE AIR GRID IN THE EQUALIZATION TANK(Claimed in Progress Report 3)

CII JNTUH

AIR GRID IN AERATION TANK – IN PROCESS


CII JNTUH

HEADER LINE FOR AIR SUPPLY – BLOWERS TO AERATION TANKS(Claimed in Progress Reports 2&3)

CII JNTUH

BIRD’’’’S-EYE VIEW OF RCC TANKS & CONTROL PANEL ROOM

(Claimed in Progress Reports 1, 2 & 3)

CII JNTUH

BIRD’’’’S-EYE VIEW OF RAILINGS AT THE RCC TANKS


CII JNTUH

12/15/2012

13

VARIOUS RCC TANKS AT THE SITE


CII JNTUH

DOSING & CHEMICAL PREPARATION SECTION(Claimed in Progress Report 3)

CII JNTUH

FAB MEDIA


CII JNTUH

VALVES & HOSE PIPES FOR THE AIR GRID AT AERATION TANKS


CII JNTUH

SAMPLE SHOT OF HDPE AND UPVC PIPE FITTINGS


CII JNTUH

INTERCONNECTING PIPELINES FOR PUMPS(Claimed in Progress Report 3)

CII JNTUH

12/15/2012

14

CII JNTUH

VIEW OF THE GRAVITY LINES FOR THE AERATION TANKS


CII JNTUH

MS FILTERS (PSF & ACF)


CII JNTUH

FILTER PRESS ATOP THE DECANTER ROOM


CII JNTUH

CLOSE-UP SHOT OF THE FILTER PRESS STRUCTURE


CII JNTUH

FILTER PRESS PLATES


CII JNTUH

12/15/2012

15

MCC PANEL BOARD


CII JNTUH

PAINTS & OTHER MISCELLANEOUS MATERIAL


CII JNTUH

1

Page 1

CETPs as an Opportunity

for

Industrial Promotion

by

A K JindalLarsen & Toubro Limited, Mumbai

company presentation 201215/12/2012 Page 2

Water – Issues & Solutions

The Issue

Acute water shortage

Increasing water demand

Stakeholders competition (farmers, cities, industries)

Solutions

Water awareness and minimization

Water conservation & harvesting

Recycle and re-use

PPP

CETPs for SSIscompany presentation 201215/12/2012

Page 3

Industry

Civil Society

Agriculture

WaterWater

Water - Conflicting Interests

Page 4

SSIs & Environment

�There are more than 300,000 SSI units

�Over 900 clusters/industrial estates of the country

�Significant contribution to Indian economy

�SSIs face stiff environmental regulations


Page 5

SSIs & Water Pollution

The specific rate of generation of pollutants is generally higher because of the inefficient production technologies

It is difficult for each industrial unit to provide and operate individual wastewater treatment plant due to:

- Scale of operations

- Lack of space

- Lack of skilled manpower


CETPs for SSIs

The concept of the CETP - A co-operative movement for water pollution control

CETPs - The main objectives:

�Wastewater treatment and water conservation

�To reduce the treatment cost to be borne by an individual member unit to a minimum

�Protecting the water environment to a maximum


2

Page 7

CETPs & Industrial Promotion

CETPs Provide an Opportunity for Industrial

Promotion by Promoting:

Proper pollution abatement infrastructure and regulating development around Industrial Estates in an environment-friendly manner

CTPs also contribute towards sustainable development by providing integrated water & wastewater management system


Encouragement for CETPs


To encourage use of new technologies for CETPs for existing SSI clusters of units a scheme for financial assistance is formulated by MoEF

Page 9

The Criteria for Consideration for Assistance:

�CETPs in industrial estates or in a cluster of Small Scale Industrial units are encouraged.

� Central Assistance will be available only for clusters of SSIs.

� Projects for assistance will be prioritised on the basis of :

� Toxicity of pollutants

� Pollution load being generated and to be treated; and

� Number of units covered


Guidelines for CETPs

�The CETPs are to be set up by an appropriate institution

�The project should be self-supporting for repayment of the loan and meeting operation and maintenance costs

�The project must formulate adequate institutional arrangements for cost sharing, recovery of dues and management and ensure observance of prescribed standards

� Possibility of recycling/reusing the treated effluent from the CETPs by the member units should be explored

�A legal agreement between the CETP Co. and its member units to be executed


Page 11

CETPs - Financial Assistance

State subsidy: 25% of the total project cost

Central subsidy: 25% of the total project cost

Entrepreneurs contribution: 20% of the total project cost

Loan: 30% of the total project cost

Large and medium scale industries other than 17 categories of heavily polluted industries may join the CETPs. However, the large and medium scale industries would not be entitled for any subsidy meant for SSIs


Suitability of CETPs?

CETPs are an end-of-pipe technology

End-of-pipe technologies are known to be the most expensive of measures to deal with pollution

Adoption of clean technologies, waste minimization and resource recovery programs represent the better alternative to treatment

CETPs have utility in treating homogenous waste streams, however their suitability to treat waste streams arising from diverse manufacturing processes is in question


3

Page 13

The Problems with CETPs

Range of problems associated with CETPs:

� Procedural delays

� Problems with ownership structures

� Cost overruns

� Management of toxic sludge

� Enforcement of pretreatment requirements


Present Experience with CETPs

Present Experience with 130 CETPs - Highly unsatisfactory

� Poor operation and maintenance

� Treated effluent quality from CETPs is dependent on the inlet quality to the CETPs

� Primary treatment units based on physico-chemical treatment are not effective

� Lack of expertise and skilled manpower

� High TDS in the raw influent reaching CETPs

� Incapable of handling huge quantities of sludges


Page 15

CETPs and Project Appraisal Documents

World Bank - “CETPs generally fail to address toxic effluents.”

Different project appraisal documents pin the failure on a poor monitoring and enforcement regime rather than on the technology itself


Need for Private Sector Participation in CETPs

Private Sector Participation is sought to essentially bring in:

� Private capital

� Private management

� New & better technology

The modality of PSP critically depends on exact objectives sought to be achieved


Page 17

Requirements of PSP in CETPs

� Adequate framework for PSP

� Sufficient project preparation & development

� Proper system to address concerns of all stakeholders


Thank youThank you

[email protected]

(0)9967408635

12/15/2012

1

Common Effluent Treatment Plant

Mr. Ravirajsinh Gohil

Assistant Manager,

Vapi Waste & Effluent Management

Company Ltd.

CETP [Common Effluent Treatment Plant] in Gujarat

� There are total 34 CETPs in Gujarat in which 29 are inoperational status and 5 are in proposed status.

� Of these CETPs, 15 are in GIDC estates and 19 areoutside the GIDC estates.

� Total capacity of CETPs is 706.785 MLD and totalnumber of members are 6483.

� List of CETPs is given below:

CETP [Common Effluent Treatment Plant] in Gujarat

Sr. No. Management’s Name and LocationNo. of

Members

Capacity in

MLDStatus

1. The Green Environment Services Co-op. Society

Ltd. 244-251, Phase II, GIDC Vatva Ahmedabad

671 16Operational

2. Odhav Enviro Project Ltd., 25, GIDC Odhav,

Ahmedabad

54 1.6Operational

3. Gujarat Vepari Maha Mandal Sahkari Udhyogik

Vasahat Ltd., 181, GVMMS Industrial Estate,

Odhav, Ahmedabad

372 1.00

Operational

4. Odhav Green Enviro Project Association, 394,

GIDC Odhav, Ahmedabad

2 1.5Operational

5. Naroda Enviro Projects Ltd., 512-515, Phase I,

GIDC Naroda, Ahmedabad

180 3.5Operational

6. Narol Dyestuff Enviro Society, 1083 Near Vishal

Textile Mill, B/h Narol-Court, Narol, Ahmedabad

27 0.10

Operational

7. Sanand Eco Projects Ltd. (Incineration system),

Ajanta Industrial Estate, Iyara – Sanand Dist.

Ahmedabad

49 0.20

Operational

CETP [Common Effluent Treatment Plant] in Gujarat Contd…8. Bavla Eco Project. Sr No: 1440/P, Opp : Ganpati Boil

Centre Ta. Bavla Dist : Ahmedabad.

12 1.0

Operational

9. Vinayak Jal Sudhikaran Co.op. Soc. Ltd. C/o . Tirupati

Agro Ind. At Bavla. Dist : Ahmedabad.

20 1.5

Operational

10. Pollution Advisory Committee, NIA [Nandesari

Industries Association] 153/A, GIDC Nandesari

District Vadodara

177 5.5

Operational

11. Enviro Infrastructure Co. Ltd. ECP Canal road,

Umraya, Ta. Padra District Vadodara

89 2.25

Operational

12. Enviro Technology Ltd., 2413/2414, GIDC Estate,

Ankleshwar, District Bharuch

268 1.80

Operational

13. Bharuch Eco-Aqua Infrastructure Ltd.,(BEAIL),

Ankleshwar

1051 60Operational

14. Panoli Enviro Technology Ltd. 619, GIDC Estate,

Panoli, District Bharuch

119 1Operational

CETP [Common Effluent Treatment Plant] in Gujarat Contd…15. Globe Enviro Care Ltd. [chemical units], PP 1,

Off road no. 2, B/h Kay Tex Mills, GIDC

Estate, Sachin – Surat

50 0.5

Operational

16. Sachin Enviro Infra Ltd., [process houses]

P/2, GIDC Sachin Dist. Surat

71 50Operational

17. Palsana Enviro Protection Ltd., Kadodara-

Surat

102 100Operational

18. Vapi Waste & Effluent Management Co. Ltd.,

4807, Phase IV, GIDC Vapi, District Valsad

786 70Operational

19. Tata motors Ltd, Vendor Park Sanand, Dist-

Ahmedabad.

42 2Operational

20. Veraval Industries Association 5/6, GIDC

Veraval, District Junagadh

68 5Operational

21. Jetpur Dyeing & Printing Association

Kankiya Plot, Jetpur, District Rajkot

1174 11Operational

22. Shri Dhareshwar GIDC Vistar Association,

Nr. Dhareshwar Temple, National Highway,

Navagadh, Rajkot

26 0.1

Operational

CETP [Common Effluent Treatment Plant] in Gujarat Contd…23. Jay Kay Enviro-Technologies Pvt. Ltd.,

Kalipat, Bhavnagar road, Rajkot

130 0.035

Operational

24. Rajkot Electroplating Association, Rajkot

Shapar (Veraval), Ta: Kotadasangani Dist.

Rajkot

21 0.01

Operational

25. Kalol GIDC Industries Association 65/66,

GIDC Estate Kalol, District Gandhinagar

39 0.4

Operational

26. Zydus Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd, Changodar,

District Ahmedabad

12 0.75

Operational

27. Pandesara Green Co-op. Society Ltd.,

GIDC - Surat

122 100Operational

28. Gujarat Eco Textile Park Pvt.Ltd, Village

Baleswar Dist. Surat.

17 60

Operational

12/15/2012

2

CETP [Common Effluent Treatment Plant] in Gujarat Contd…29. New Palsana Industries Association, Plot 2, Block 194 B,

Baleshwar, Ta. Palsana Dist. Surat

17 45

Proposed

30. Jamnagar Electroplaters Association, Jamnagar 87 0.04Proposed

31. CETP forWashing Ghat, Derdi Road, Jetpur Dist. Rajkot 100 20

Proposed

32. ATPA Swarnim Gujarat Enviro Pvt Limited Pirana Sewage

Farm Area, Village Gyaspur, Ahmedabad

89 100

Proposed

33. Sarigam Industrial Waste Effluent Co. Ltd, GIDC,

Sarigam, Dist.Valsad.

289 15

Proposed

34. CETP for Washing Ghat, Village Bhat Gam Ta: Bhesan,

Dist. Junagadh

150 30

Proposed

CETP Business Model

� Pattern of Financial Assistance and other relatedcriteria

1. State subsidy – 25% of the total project cost;

2. Central subsidy – 25% of the total project cost;

3. Entrepreneurs contribution – 20% of the totalproject cost;

4. Loan from financial institutions – 30% of the totalproject cost

Preamble Preamble Preamble Preamble

• The “Vapi Industrial Estate” was started by GIDC in 1967 andconsists of around 1800 industries, majority being small scaleunits (SSI) mainly chemical, paper, pesticides, packaging, dyesand intermediates, pharmaceuticals, textiles etc.

• Concerned about the seriousness of the statutory obligationsof stringent compliance norms under various pollution controlacts and inability of small and medium scale units to complywith them, CETP was designed and built and which is run byVapi Waste & effluent Management Co. Ltd. (VWEMCL)promoted by the Govt of Gujarat (GoG) and Vapi IndustriesAssociation (VIA)

9

Cont.Cont.Cont.Cont.

• VWEMCL was formed in 1997 with an OBJECTIVE ofproviding a Comprehensive Environment Management(CEMP) to the estate.

• Vapi Waste & Effluent Management Co. Ltd. (VWEMCL)is a non equity, non profit entity.

• The total investment of the company is Rs. 100.0 croresand turnover is Rs. 25.0 crores per anum.

Functions of VWEMCL

12/15/2012 11

VWEMCLVWEMCLVWEMCLVWEMCL

Common Effluent Common Effluent Common Effluent Common Effluent Treatment PlantTreatment PlantTreatment PlantTreatment Plant

(CETP)(CETP)(CETP)(CETP)

55 MLD55 MLD55 MLD55 MLD

Treatment of Treatment of Treatment of Treatment of industrial industrial industrial industrial effluent effluent effluent effluent

Treatment Treatment Treatment Treatment Storage Disposal Storage Disposal Storage Disposal Storage Disposal

FacilityFacilityFacilityFacility

7 lacs MT 7 lacs MT 7 lacs MT 7 lacs MT

Landfill of the Landfill of the Landfill of the Landfill of the hazardous hazardous hazardous hazardous waste waste waste waste

Centre of Centre of Centre of Centre of ExcellenceExcellenceExcellenceExcellence

Analytical laboratory, Analytical laboratory, Analytical laboratory, Analytical laboratory, Seminar hall, video Seminar hall, video Seminar hall, video Seminar hall, video conferences, Digital conferences, Digital conferences, Digital conferences, Digital

library, IT centre, pilot library, IT centre, pilot library, IT centre, pilot library, IT centre, pilot plant trialsplant trialsplant trialsplant trials

Head OfficeHead OfficeHead OfficeHead Office

Admin, Finance, Admin, Finance, Admin, Finance, Admin, Finance, Accounts & Accounts & Accounts & Accounts & PurchasePurchasePurchasePurchase

CETPCETPCETPCETP

12/15/2012

3

PRIMARY

CLARIFIERS

S.D.B Filtrate Pump

MAIN

INLET

CHAMBER

FACCO

COARSE SCREEN

CHAMBER

AUTO SCREEN

CHAMBER

GRIT CHAMBER

EQULISATION

TANKS

FLASH MIXER &

FLOCCULATOR

PRIMARY

CLARIFIERSUASB FEED SUMP

UASB

RAC

CAACO REACTORS

AERATION TANKS

SECONDRY

CLARIFIERS

FINAL OUTLET

SLUDGE THICNERS

DECANTERS

TIDEL ZONE OF

RIVER DAMAN

GANGA

S.D.B Filtrate Pump

Wastewater from GIDC Estate55 MLD

15 MLD

Sludge Over Flow

Centrate

Cake

Cake

CSWP

WAS

RAS

WASW.W.

40 MLD

55 MLD

15MLD

EXISTING PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM OF CETP

40 MLD

Plant Performanceof last 12 Years

Methane gas Flared from UASB

4037

40 41 4143

4745

40

45

50

56 55

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Inflow MLD from 1999 to 2011

18352022

2152

2431 2355 2367

2580

2249

19411801 1763

15721485

494687

842974

1082 1052 1080

823 780620 641

514 521

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

YEAR

Inlet & Outlet COD ( mg /lit) Profile InletOutlet

682

746782 800

835779

846

760

649694

593 588

498

4570

150 163

238 218 241

178143

95 10253 50

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

BOD Profile of CETP - VapiInlet Outlet

178

7560 53

180

7960

48

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

2008 2009 2010 2011

NH

3-N

mg

/ l

it

YEAR

NH3-N Profile of CETP - VapiInlet Outlet

12/15/2012

4

THANK YOU

Birk

enbe

ul, B

TS-P

ME-

IS-W

WT

Page

1; 2

012-

11-0

9

BTS

WA

STE

WA

TER

TR

EA

TME

NT

for l

arge

Che

mic

al P

arks

Birk

enbe

ul, B

TS-P

ME-

IS-W

WT

Page

2; 2

012-

11-0

9

Publ

icity

and

Env

ironm

enta

l Pro

tect

ion

–19

70(c

ompa

ny o

wn

philo

soph

y of

resp

onsi

ble

care

and

sus

tain

able

dev

elop

men

t )

Bay

er‘s

firs

t rep

ort

on e

nviro

nmen

tal

and

soci

al a

spec

ts

Bay

er‘s

firs

t In

tern

atio

nal R

epor

t on

envi

ronm

ent

Bay

er re

gula

tions

for

envi

ronm

enta

l and

sa

fety

asp

ects

Bay

er fo

undi

ng m

embe

r of U

N

Glo

bal C

ompa

ct P

rogr

am

Bay

er p

artn

ersh

ip o

f the

UN

„c

hild

ren

and

yout

h“

Envi

ronm

ent P

rogr

am

Bay

erC

limat

e C

heck

Pr

ogra

mm

1976

1992

1986

2000

2004

2007W

orld

eco

nom

ic fo

rum

D

avos

201

2 „G

old

clas

s aw

ard“

for

sust

aina

bilit

y st

rate

gy

2012

Birk

enbe

ul, B

TS-P

ME-

IS-W

WT

Page

3; 2

012-

11-0

9

Ope

ratin

g B

ayer

Site

Lev

erku

sen

–to

day

(sta

te o

f the

art

tech

nolo

gy p

rovi

ded

by B

TS :

eco

nom

ic, i

nnov

ativ

e &

rel

iabl

e)

Prod

uctio

n

Site

400

ha

Solid

Was

te

trea

tmen

t+

land

fill a

rea

Site

100

ha

City

of

Leve

rkus

en

Was

tew

ater

Trea

tmen

t

Plan

t

Birk

enbe

ul, B

TS-P

ME-

IS-W

WT

Page

4; 2

012-

11-0

9

Scop

eof

supp

lySo

lutio

ns fo

r was

tew

ater

tr

eatm

ent p

lant

s th

at a

re

base

d on

our

ow

n pr

oces

s de

velo

pmen

ts ,

oper

atio

n fe

ed b

ack

and

man

y ye

ars

of e

xper

ienc

e

•ta

ilorm

ade

•cu

stom

ized

•in

nova

tive

•ef

ficie

nt

Cus

tom

er‘s

bene

fit:

crea

tion

ofa

high

lyef

ficie

ntin

divi

dual

w

aste

wat

ertr

eatm

ent

solu

tion

BTS

-O

ur P

rodu

ct P

ortfo

lio

-Was

tew

ater

Tre

atm

ent -

Birk

enbe

ul, B

TS-P

ME-

IS-W

WT

Page

5; 2

012-

11-0

9

Gen

eral

Was

tew

ater

Tre

atm

ent C

once

pt in

Che

mic

al P

arks

Central biological treatment, e. g.Tower Biology

Incineration

Pre-

trea

tmen

t, (e

. o. o

xida

tion)

Pre-

trea

tmen

t(e

. g. d

istil

latio

n)

?

Bay

Flot

ech®

LOPR

OX®

Mul

ti-ba

rrie

r co

ncep

t:

anal

ytic

s, m

anag

emen

t, co

ntro

l, st

orag

e, e

mer

genc

y bu

ffer f

acili

ties

, ...

Birk

enbe

ul, B

TS-P

ME-

IS-W

WT

Page

6; 2

012-

11-0

9

Tech

nolo

gy fo

r Cen

tral B

WW

TP

•BA

YE

R T

ower

Bio

logy

and

adv

anta

ges

•BA

YE

R A

erat

ion

Sys

tem

and

adv

anta

ges

•R

efer

ence

s

Birk

enbe

ul, B

TS-P

ME-

IS-W

WT

Page

7; 2

012-

11-0

9

Bas

ic C

once

pt o

f BA

YE

R T

ower

Bio

logy

A m

odul

ar a

nd fl

exib

le u

nit f

or a

erob

ic in

dust

rial w

aste

wat

er tr

eatm

ent

Birk

enbe

ul, B

TS-P

ME-

IS-W

WT

Page

8; 2

012-

11-0

9

Con

cept

Var

iant

es o

f BA

YE

R T

ower

Bio

logy

Tow

er B

iolo

gy w

ith

inte

grat

ed s

econ

dary

cla

rifie

rs

Hig

h sp

ace

effic

ienc

y

Tow

er B

iolo

gy w

ith fl

otat

ion

Effi

cent

for „

prob

lem

atic

“w

aste

wat

ers

Birk

enbe

ul, B

TS-P

ME-

IS-W

WT

Page

9; 2

012-

11-0

9

Adv

anta

ges

of B

AY

ER

Tow

er B

iolo

gy

�N

o ro

tatin

g pa

rts in

aer

atio

n ta

nk a

nd c

larif

ier

�O

pera

tiona

l des

ign

base

d on

30

year

sof

ow

ners

exp

erie

nce

Opt

imal

Lay

out

Hig

h Av

aila

bilit

y

Sim

ple

Con

stru

ctio

n

�30

–50

% le

ss g

roud

spa

ce th

an c

onve

ntio

nal

syst

em w

ith la

rge

open

sur

face

�Al

l tan

ks a

re a

bove

gro

und

�S

tand

ard

tank

con

stru

ctio

n al

low

s fo

rco

nven

tiona

l wel

ding

and

lini

ng p

roce

dure

s

�N

o co

mpl

icat

ed in

tern

al s

truct

ure

(no

draf

t tub

es -

no s

ieve

pla

tes)

Opt

imiz

ed in

vest

men

t and

ope

ratio

nal c

osts

Birk

enbe

ul, B

TS-P

ME-

IS-W

WT

Page

10;

201

2-11

-09

Adv

anta

ges

of B

AY

ER

Tow

er B

iolo

gy

0510152025

510

1520

2530

Heig

ht [m

]

Oxy

gen

in

off-g

as

[vol

-%]

•Pr

even

tion

of a

ir po

llutio

nby

aer

osol

es a

nd fu

mes

•R

educ

tion

of s

trip

ping

ef

fect

s

80%

Opt

imal

Oxy

gen

Util

izat

ion

30%

Tow

er B

iolo

gyC

oven

tiona

l Sys

tem

Less

aer

atio

n ai

r is

need

ed

Birk

enbe

ul, B

TS-P

ME-

IS-W

WT

Page

11;

201

2-11

-09

Con

tent

•BA

YE

R T

ower

Bio

logy

and

adv

anta

ges

•BA

YE

R A

erat

ion

Sys

tem

and

adv

anta

ges

•R

efer

ence

s

Birk

enbe

ul, B

TS-P

ME-

IS-W

WT

Page

12;

201

2-11

-09

Gen

eral

Des

crip

tion

of B

AY

ER

Aer

atio

n S

yste

m

The

BAY

ER

Slo

t Inj

ecto

r is

the

mai

n pa

rt

of th

e B

AYE

R A

erat

ion

Sys

tem

.

Birk

enbe

ul, B

TS-P

ME-

IS-W

WT

Page

13;

201

2-11

-09

Hyd

rody

nam

ic p

rinci

ples

of B

AY

ER

Slo

t Inj

ecto

r

•Th

e ki

netic

ene

rgy

of th

e liq

uid

brea

ks th

e ga

s in

to fi

ne b

ubbl

es(d

<0.1

5mm

)

•Ai

r is

not c

ompr

esse

d in

the

liqui

dph

ase

but d

ragg

ed b

y th

e pr

opel

ling

wat

er

Birk

enbe

ul, B

TS-P

ME-

IS-W

WT

Page

14;

201

2-11

-09

Adv

anta

ges

of B

AY

ER

Are

atio

n S

yste

m

�W

ide

oper

atio

n co

nditi

on:

Oxy

gen

Inpu

t fro

m 6

0 to

140

%

�E

asy

to e

xten

d w

ith fu

rther

Inje

ctor

s

Hig

h E

ffici

ency

Hig

h Fl

exib

ility

�3.

2 to

3.8

kg

O2

/ KW

h in

was

te w

ater

ove

r lon

g op

erat

iona

l tim

e!

�N

o C

logg

ing

Mad

e of

Pol

ypro

pyle

n.�

Hig

h re

stis

tanc

e ag

ains

t cor

rosi

on a

nd e

rosi

on

�Lo

ng o

pera

tiona

l tim

e w

ithou

t mai

nten

ance

.H

igh

Avai

labi

lity

Low

ope

ratio

nal c

osts

Birk

enbe

ul, B

TS-P

ME-

IS-W

WT

Page

15;

201

2-11

-09

Con

tent

•BA

YE

R T

ower

Bio

logy

and

adv

anta

ges

•BA

YE

R A

erat

ion

Sys

tem

and

adv

anta

ges

•R

efer

ence

s

Birk

enbe

ul, B

TS-P

ME-

IS-W

WT

Page

16;

201

2-11

-09

Ref

eren

ce B

AY

ER

Tow

er B

iolo

gy 1

Leve

rkus

en, G

erm

any

•Fo

ur T

ower

s, in

tegr

ated

cla

rifie

rs

•C

hem

ical

was

te w

ater

: 960

00 m

³/d

•O

2-In

put C

apac

ity:

220

t/dBi

rken

beul

, BTS

-PM

E-IS

-WW

T Pa

ge 1

7; 2

012-

11-0

9

Ref

eren

ce B

AY

ER

Tow

er B

iolo

gy2

Bus

hy P

ark,

Tex

as, U

SA

•Tw

o To

wer

s, G

ravi

ty C

larif

ier

•C

hem

ical

was

tew

ater

: 560

0 m

³/d

•O

2-In

put C

apac

ity:

1

2 t/d

Birk

enbe

ul, B

TS-P

ME-

IS-W

WT

Page

18;

201

2-11

-09

Ref

eren

ce B

AY

ER

Tow

er B

iolo

gy 3

Mex

ico

•Tw

o To

wer

s, F

lota

tion

•C

hem

ical

was

tew

ater

: 230

00 m

³/d

•O

2-In

put C

apac

ity:

4

3 t/d

Birk

enbe

ul, B

TS-P

ME-

IS-W

WT

Page

19;

201

2-11

-09

Ext

ract

of R

efer

ence

s of

BAY

ER

Tow

er B

iolo

gyC

ompa

nyC

ount

ryK

ind

of W

aste

Wat

erC

apac

ity

[m³/d

]O

2 in

put

[t/d]

Than

eIn

dia

Che

mic

al36

004

Wes

selin

g P

etro

chem

ieG

erm

any

Pet

roch

emic

al8.

000

30

E.C

.C.A

.C.I.

V.M

exic

oIn

dust

rial

2300

043

Dys

tar

Indo

nesi

aD

yes

100

0.2

Cob

ega

Coc

a C

ola

Spa

inB

ever

age

Pro

duct

ion

2.00

03,

2

Bay

er L

a Fe

lgue

raS

pain

Che

mic

al80

01,

5

Sta

deG

erm

any

Che

mic

al30

000

40

Aga

nIs

rael

Che

mic

al80

0012

From

197

8 to

201

0 B

ayer

set

up

mor

e th

an 3

0 To

wer

Bio

logi

es in

the

wor

ldw

ith a

n al

l-ove

r was

te w

ater

trea

tmen

t vol

ume

of ½

mio

m³/d

Birk

enbe

ul, B

TS-P

ME-

IS-W

WT

Page

20;

201

2-11

-09

�H

igh

effic

ient

BAY

ER A

erat

ion

Syst

em

�30

Yea

rs o

f ow

ners

exp

erie

nce

Than

k Yo

u fo

r You

r Atte

ntio

n

�H

igh

avai

labl

e B

AYER

Tow

er B

iolo

gy

Your

Par

tner

for

Pro

ject

s in

the

Che

mic

al a

nd

Pha

rmac

eutic

al

Indu

stry

Mas

terin

g Te

chno

logi

cal C

ompl

exity

Inte

rdis

cipl

inar

y. In

tegr

al. I

nnov

ativ

e.

info

@ba

yert

echn

olog

y.co

m

ww

w.b

ayer

tech

nolo

gy.c

om

1

Page 1company presentation 201215/12/2012

CETPs in Gujarat - Overview

Nitesh PatelGIZ, Gandhinagar (Gujarat)

Page 2

Status of CETPs in Gujarat

15/12/2012

• Total Treatment Capacity of 496.75 MLD (operational) & 210.04

(proposed)

• Treatment Capacity Range – Max. 100 MLD to Min. 0.01 MLD

Parameters Operationa

l

Proposed

Total Number of CETPs in Gujarat

(as on March 2012)

28 6

Total number of Indutries Facilitated 5751 732

Total Treatment Capacity 486.75 MLD 210.04 MLD

Page 3

Number of CETPs – State Wise

15/12/2012 Page 4

Location Overview of CETPs


Page 5

Financial Assistance - Gujarat Scheme

15/12/2012

Scheme for Financial assistance to Common Environmental Facilities (CIEFs), Gujarat

� The operative period of this scheme is from 11/06/2009 to 10/06/2014

� Any private or public institution shall be eligible under the scheme.

� Viability gap funding of up to 20% of the project cost by GIDB

� For professional agency it is in the form of assistance up to 25% of eligible fixed capital investment in the Project.

Assistance to Critical Infrastructure Projects, Gujarat

� The operative period of this scheme is from 27.02.2009 to 26.02.2014.

� Assistance depending upon the requirement of State contribution, up-to 60% of

project cost, with ceiling of assistance as below:

Rs. 10 crore_ in case the area of the project is less or equal to 100 hectares

Rs. 20 crore. in case the area is more than 100 hectaresPage 6

Incentive Scheme – IC, GoG


2

Page 7company presentation 201215/12/2012 Page 8

CETPs Treatment Technologies and Wastewater Collection &

Disposal System

15/12/2012

S.

No. CETP

Capacity

MILD Technology/ Treatment Scheme

Type of

industries

1

Sachin

CETP-II, Sachin,

Surat

50.00

Eq. tank + Flash mixer + Primary

Lamella + Aeration tank + S5T + pH adjustment + Tube settler +

Sand filter + ACF

71 (Textile

Dyeing and Printing Units)

2

Vapi

CETP, Vapi,

Valsad

55

Screen + Grit chamber + Eq. tank

+ Clariflocculator + Aeration tank + Secondary clarifier and Sludge

drying beds

777 (Paper

mills, Chemicals,

Dyes, Pharma,

Engg.)

3

Vatva

CETP, Ahmedab

ad

16

Eq.tank + F.mixer + Clariflocculator

+ Aeration tank + Aeration tank-integral secondary clarifier and

Sludge drying beds

464 (Dyes,

Textile, Pharma,

Chemicals,

Rolling mills)

Page 915/12/2012

S. No.

CETP Capacity

MILD Technology/ Treatment Scheme Type of industries

4Naroda CETP, Ahmedabad 3

O&G trap + Eq.tank + F.mixer + Clariflocculator + Aeration tank + Secondary clarifier and Sludge

drying beds

255 (Textile & Chemicals Dyes, Pharmaceuticals)

5Odhav CETP, Ahmedabad

1.20 Eq. tank + F.mixer + Clariflocculator + Aeration

tank-I + S.Clarlfier-1 + Aeration tank-II + S.Clarifier-II and Filter press for sludge

61 (Dye & Dye Intermediate, Textiles)

6

Nandesari CETP,

Vadodara 5.50

Screen + Grit chamber + Eq. tank + F.mixer + Clariflocculator + Aeration tank +Secondary

clarifier +Sand and activated carbon filter and Sludge drying beds

256 (Chemical, Organic Chemicals, Dyes & Dye

Intermediate)

7 Ankleshwar

CETP 1

Eq. tank + Neutralization tank + Clariflocculator + Aeration tank + Secondary clarifier + Chemical dozing tank + Tube settler + Sand and activated carbon filter and Vacuum drum filter for sludge

263 (Chemical, Dyes & Dye Intermediate, Pesticides,

Pharma)

8 Sachin CETP-

I, Sachin, Surat

0.50 Eq. tank + Chemical treatment tank +

Clariflocculator + Aeration tank-I + Lamella Clarifier-I + Aeration tank-II + Lamella Clarifier-II

38 (Dyes & Dye Intermediate)


S. No.

CETP Capacity

MILD Technology/ Treatment Scheme Type of industries

9

Sarigam CETP,

Sarigam, Valsad

0.40 Eq. tank + Flash mixer + Clariflocculator +

Aeration tank-I + Secondary Clarifier-I + Aeration tank-II + Secondary Clarifier-II

17 (Chemical, Pharma, Dyes & Dye Intermediate)

10Dhareswar

CETP, Rajkot0.10

O&G trap + Flash mixer + Clarifier + Bio tank + Sand filter + AC filter

23 (Textile Printing Units)

11 Sanand CETP,

Paldi, Ahmedabad

0.2 Eq. tank + Filter press + Multiple effect

evaporation system + Incineration chamber (for liquid and solid waste)

32 (Chemical, Pharma, Dyes. Pesticides,

Petroleum)

12Jetpur CETP,

Jetpur 20

Eq. tank + O&G trap + Chemical mixing + CIariflocculator + Aerated lagoon

972 (Textile printing units)

13Panoli CETP,

Bharuch 1.00

Eq. tank + Flash mixer + Clariflocculator + Aeration tank + S. clarifier + DM filter

101 (Chemical, Pharma, Dyes)

14 GVMSAV

Odhav CETP, Ahmedabad

1.0 Eq.tank + F.mixer + Clariflocculator

+ Aeration tank + S.clarifier + Pressure sand filter + Activated carbon filter

264 (Dye & Dye Intermediate)


Nitesh Patel

Indo-German Environment Partnership (IGEP) Programme Junior Advisor

Deutsche Gesellschaft fürInternationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH GIZ - IGEP Cell, C/o, GCPC, Block No. 11&12, 3rd Floor,

Udyog Bhavan, Sector-11, Gandhinagar, Gujarat – 382017 (India)

Tel: +91 79 23244147, Ext no. 7

E-Mail: [email protected]

Websites: www.giz.de , www.igep.in

1



Common Effluent Treatment Plants

CII - Sohrabji Godrej Green Business Centre, Hyderabad

Technical Session II: Treatment Technologies & Monitoring

23 November 2012

Energy Efficient Turbo Blowers for Aeration

Kiron C. Pande - Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.

1

Page 1

Recycle and Reuse Technologies

for Wastewater

Workshop “CETP in India” 23 November 2012

Dr. Christian Kazner, Prof. Christoph Hugi, Prof. Thomas Wintgens

Institute for Ecopreneurship

Page 2

Precipitation

Groundwater Surface water

(rivers, reservoirs)

Drinking water

treatment

Wastewater

collection and treatment

Stormwater

management

Water supply and

"consumption"

Desalination

Sea water

Brackish water

Water reuse

1 2

3

1) Managed aquifer

recharge

2) Indirect potable reuse

3) Direct reuse

Water cycle in water stressed regions

Page 3

Key drivers for alternative sources projects

The following key challenges drive alternative sources projects:

• Availability of natural sources

• Quality of surface water and groundwater

• Water losses: Evaporation, leaking pipes, irrigation practices

• Prospects:

– population dynamics and high population density,

– climate change impacts,

– energy sources and competition,

– carbon footprint,

– increasing demand for irrigation

• Infrastructure and water management deficits

Page 4

Wastewater reclamation and reuse

adopted from Veolia Water (Durham, 2006)

Page 5

Reuse categories

� Environmental

• lakes and ponds

• river flow augmentation

• fisheries

� Non-potable urban reuse

• fire protection

• cleaning use

• toilet flushing

� Potable reuse

• blending into reservoir

• pipe to pipe

incre

asin

g q

uali

ty r

eq

uir

em

en

ts

� Agricultural irrigation

• crops eaten raw

• crops heated

� Landscape irrigation

• parks

• golf courses

• residential

� Industrial reuse

• cooling

• boiler feed

• process water

� Groundwater recharge

• aquifer replenishment

• repulsion of salt intrusion

Page 6

Water Quality Issue: Chemical contaminants

NutrientsPhosphorus

Nitrogen

SaltsSodium, chloride, bromide…

Trace organicsIndustrial chemicalsEndocrine disruptors

Disinfection byproductsPharmaceuticals

Pesticides

Heavy MetalsLead, Copper, Zink,

Cadmium, Mercury…

2

Page 7

Water Quality Issue: Pathogenic organisms

VirusesViruses Bacteria

Parasitic Protozoa

Helminths

Pathogen type Numbers in Wastewater

Infectious dose Mortality potential

Virus 100 – 104 Low High

Bacteria 103 – 109 High Moderate - High

Protozoa 10 – 104 Low Low

Helminths < 10 Low Very low

Page 8

Distribution of global water reuse applications with secondary or higher treatment levels

Landscape irrigation 20.0%

Environmental enhancement 8.0%

Recreational use 6.4%

Non-potable urban uses

8.3%

Agricultural irrigation 32.0%

Other 1.5%

Groundwater recharge 2.2%

Industrial reuse 19.3%

Indirect potable reuse 2.3%

Landscape irrigation 20.0%

Environmental enhancement 8.0%

Recreational use 6.4%

Non-potable urban uses

8.3%

Agricultural irrigation 32.0%

Other 1.5%

Groundwater recharge 2.2%

Industrial reuse 19.3%

Indirect potable reuse 2.3%

GWI/PUB Water Reuse Inventory, 2009

Page 9

Freshwater by agricultural sector in 2000

Kretschmer et al., 2002Page 10

Health-based targets for treated wastewater use in agriculture based on WHO guideline (2006)

Type of irrigationTarget for viral, bacterial

and protozoaMicrobial reduction target

for helminth eggsHealth protection

measures

Unrestricted≤10-6 DALY1 per person per

year (achievable by a 6-7 log

units pathogen reduction)

≤1/L (arithmetic mean –

determined throughout

irrigation season for at least 90% of samples)

Wastewater treatment

Health and hygiene promotion

Chemotherapy and immunization

Restricted≤10-6 DALY per person per year

(achievable by a 2-3 log units

pathogen reduction)

≤1/L (arithmetic mean – as

above)

Produce restriction

Food handling and preparation

Cooking foods

irrigation timings

Localized (e.g. drip irrigation)

≤10-6 DALY per person per year

(a) Low-growing crops: ≤1/L

(arithmetic mean)

(b) High-growing crops:

(include fruits trees, olives, etc.

– no crops to be picked from the soil): no recommendation

Access control. Use of personal

protective equipment.

Intermediate host control

Reducing vector contact (bed

nets, repellents)

Other site specific measures

1DALY: Disability-adjusted life years (expressed as per person per year)

Page 11

Forecast of water reuse market by treatment grade

three stage = dual membrane + AOP

11 GWI, 2009

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Tota

l wa

ter

reu

se c

ap

aci

ty,

Mm

³/d

Three stage reuse

Tertiary only andother advanced

Secondary only

Page 12

Reclamation Technologies

Decentralizedwastewater treatment

membrane bioreactorpond treatment

partial direct reuseinfiltration

High technology

polishing stepsActivated carbon

Membrane treatment

Ozonation

Natural systemsfor polishing

Reed bed, LagoonSlow sand filter

Soil aquifer treatment

Infiltration

Top soil passageDeep well infiltration

NF/RO BrineOzonation

Recycle to MBR

Centralized

wastewater treatment

conventional activated sludgemembrane bioreactor

BACC/MF/CDI

3

Page 13

Industrial Water Reuse

AQUAFIT4USE: Case study Hamburger Rieger

Treatment train for water reuse tested in paper industry

MBR

Anaerobic Process

Membrane (UF/NF/RO)

Ozone

concentrate

Evapo-ration

1

5

6

3FM

3

Wate

r qu

ality

for re

use

low

medium

high

high

Aerobic

Softening

4

7

2

3

Page 14

Treatment process implemented in El Prat Water Reclamation Plant, Barcelona, Spain

• High salinity in the

surface and groundwater

• Salt reduction through

additional water fromseawater desalination

• Salinity control through

DER and RO in surfacewater treatment and

wastwater reclamation

Page 15

The Rhine River Basin District

Rhine – key data:

• 9 States in the Rhine River Basin

• Length: 1,320 km

• Catchment area: 200 000 km²

• Population: 58 million

• Water supply for 20 million people

• Connection to WWTP: 96 %

• Major discharges from industries in CH, F, D, NL (e.g. chemical and

pharmaceutical industries)

Page 16

Wastewater treatment and waste management at BAYER Leverkusen, Germany – CURENTA Plants

• Two stage biological

treatment of industrial anddomestic wastewater

• Sanitary landfill

Page 17

Potable Reuse along the Rhine: WTP Dusseldorf

Source: Stadtwerke Düsseldorf AG

Rhine river

extraction well

bank filtration

contact reactor

ozone

catalyst for O3 removal

buffer tank

double activated carbon filtration

phosphate silicate ClO2

drinking water supply system

SAT

filtration

ozonation

Size:56,000 m³/d

Page 18

Soil-Aquifer Treatment for agricultural reuseCase study Shafdan, Tel Aviv Region

SAT since 1977

Capacity: 342 MLD

Pre-treatment:

Secondary WWTP

Aquifer recharge

method:Pond infiltration

Water use:

Unrestricted irrigation, ~ potable quality

4

Page 19© RECLAIM WATER 2005

Capacity: 15,000 m³/d

Natural systems for reclamation: Atlantis, RZA

Pre-treatment: Secondary municipal WWTP + maturation

Aquifer recharge: Pond infiltrationWater use: Indirect Potable (Re)Use

Koeberg

R27

Dunes

Silwerstroom

Wellfield

Witzand

Wellfield

WWTW

Basin 7

Basin 12

Wesfleur

Industria

CoastalBasins

N

S

EW

N

S

EW

Oil Pipeline

0 5 km

Scale:

Page 20

Summary

• Wastewater reuse, in particular for agriculture, is of increasing importance to cope with water scarcity

• Reuse in industrial regions often involves conjunctive use of surfacewater and groundwater

• Pollution control is of utmost importance to achieve quality standardsand build trust in reuse

• Industrial often achieved in cleaner production methods

• End of pipe technologies (CETP) often involve dense membraneprocesses or other advanced technologies for safe retention of key

contaminants

12/15/2012

1

1

CSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research InstituteNagpur

ISO 9001-2008

M. Karthik, Sr. Scientist

2

Protecting the environment

Economy of scale of waste treatment, thereby reducing cost of pollutionabatement for individual industry.

Minimizing problem of lack of technical assistance and trained personnel.

Reducing problem of lack of space in the individual industry.

Homogenization of wastewater industrial cluster.

Reducing the problem of monitoring by the regulatory agencies.

Organized disposal of treated effluent & sludge.

Improved sharing and dissemination of information towards environmental

management.

Improving public image & employer morale.

� CETP is concept of treating effluents in a common facility by collectiveeffort mainly for a cluster of SMEs units.

� Concept is similar to the Municipal Corporation of cities and towns treatingsewage from the locality.

Common effluent treatment plant (CETP)Common effluent treatment plant (CETP)

Objectives of CETPObjectives of CETP

We n

eve

r know

the w

ort

h o

f w

ate

r til

l th

e w

ell

is d

ry.

Modern

technolo

gy…

..O

wes e

colo

gy…

.An a

polo

gy.

3

• Small & Medium Scale Enterprises (SMEs) contribute significantly to Indian

economy (7 % of GDP) despite stiff environmental regulations and competition

from neighboring countries in similar sectors (Leather, Textiles, Chemicals, Dye &

Dye intermediates, Pharmaceuticals, Engineering Industries).

• Quantity of wastewater generated from SMEs may not be large, but

unfortunately it aggregates to be a major pollution contributor in, Gujarat,

Maharashtra, Punjab, Andrapradesh, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal,

Delhi.

• The major areas affected by pollution from these industry cluster include

Ankaleshwar, Vapi, Palsana, Ludhiana, Hyderabad, Tirupur, Vellore, Kanpur, and

so on.

• MoEF issued a notification in January, 1991 to ensure compliance of

Environmental Standards in polluting industries.

• MoEF formulated 15 point programme for priority action to promote and setup

Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETPs) in clusters of small scale industrial

units across the country.

• CETP is listed among 54 polluting industries.

Current Status and Issues in CETPs Current Status and Issues in CETPs

State wise operational CETPS in India*State wise operational CETPS in India*

Sr. no. State No. of CETP Flow, MLD

1. Andhra Pradesh 3 12.75

2. Delhi 15 133.2

3. Gujarat 28** 500.35

4. Himachal Pradesh 4 1.1

5. Haryana 1 1.3

6. Karnataka 9@ -

7. Madhya Pradesh 3 0.9

8. Maharashtra 23# 173.35

9. Punjab 4 57.7

10. Rajasthan 2 71.15

11. Tamil Nadu 36 44.4

12 Uttar Pradesh 2 70

Total 130 1066.20

4

Source: *Central Pollution Control Board Report on Performance Status of Common Effluent TreatmentPlants in India, October 2005.**Gujarat Pollution Control Board, 2010 .@Karnataka Pollution Control Board, 2012. #Maharashtra Pollution Control Board, 2012.

1 MLD – 1000 1m3/D

Current Status and Issues in CETPs Current Status and Issues in CETPs

Issues & constraints in CETP OperationsIssues & constraints in CETP Operations

5

• Consistency in compliance to the prescribed standards by the CETPs.

• Existing treatment schemes are unable to handle emerging pollutants,

stringent regulatory norms.

• Poor operations and maintenance of treatment units.

• No separate treatment units to deal with hazardous and toxic effluents.

• Lack of access to capital investments and working capitals.

VIABLE

TECHNOLOGY

MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY

ECONOMY/COST

PLANNING COMMISSION

CONSULTANTS/VENDORS

TECHNOLOGY MANUFACTURERS

REGULATORY BODIES

Decision Makers for Selection of Viable Technologies Decision Makers for Selection of Viable Technologies Decision Makers for Selection of Viable Technologies Decision Makers for Selection of Viable Technologies Decision Makers for Selection of Viable Technologies Decision Makers for Selection of Viable Technologies Decision Makers for Selection of Viable Technologies Decision Makers for Selection of Viable Technologies

PUBLIC

ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS

12/15/2012

2

VIABLE

TECHNOLOGY

CAPITAL COST

REJECT GENERATION.

O&M COST

WATER RECOVERY

TECHNOLOGY PERFORMANCE

SLUDGE PRODUCTION

D e c i s i o n F a c t o r s f o r S e l e c t i o n o f V i a b l e Te c h n o l o g i e s o p t i o n sD e c i s i o n F a c t o r s f o r S e l e c t i o n o f V i a b l e Te c h n o l o g i e s o p t i o n sD e c i s i o n F a c t o r s f o r S e l e c t i o n o f V i a b l e Te c h n o l o g i e s o p t i o n sD e c i s i o n F a c t o r s f o r S e l e c t i o n o f V i a b l e Te c h n o l o g i e s o p t i o n sD e c i s i o n F a c t o r s f o r S e l e c t i o n o f V i a b l e Te c h n o l o g i e s o p t i o n sD e c i s i o n F a c t o r s f o r S e l e c t i o n o f V i a b l e Te c h n o l o g i e s o p t i o n sD e c i s i o n F a c t o r s f o r S e l e c t i o n o f V i a b l e Te c h n o l o g i e s o p t i o n sD e c i s i o n F a c t o r s f o r S e l e c t i o n o f V i a b l e Te c h n o l o g i e s o p t i o n s

TREATMENT TIMEFOOT PRINT

� Selection of an appropriate treatment option for optimum performance with due consideration to

investments requires comparison of different options with respect to certain criteria.

8

O t h e r F a c t o r s O t h e r F a c t o r s O t h e r F a c t o r s O t h e r F a c t o r s O t h e r F a c t o r s O t h e r F a c t o r s O t h e r F a c t o r s O t h e r F a c t o r s f o r S e l e c t i o n o f V i a b l e Te c h n o l o g i e s o p t i o n sf o r S e l e c t i o n o f V i a b l e Te c h n o l o g i e s o p t i o n sf o r S e l e c t i o n o f V i a b l e Te c h n o l o g i e s o p t i o n sf o r S e l e c t i o n o f V i a b l e Te c h n o l o g i e s o p t i o n sf o r S e l e c t i o n o f V i a b l e Te c h n o l o g i e s o p t i o n sf o r S e l e c t i o n o f V i a b l e Te c h n o l o g i e s o p t i o n sf o r S e l e c t i o n o f V i a b l e Te c h n o l o g i e s o p t i o n sf o r S e l e c t i o n o f V i a b l e Te c h n o l o g i e s o p t i o n s

� Reliability

Measure of how well a system performs in relation to expectations without breakdowns or failure totreat wastewater to meet water quality objectives. Reliability also is associated with simplicity ofoperation and ease of maintenance. Reliable systems that require highly skilled operators and carefulmaintenance would be less appropriate.

� Simplicity

Simplicity of operation and ease of maintenance. This is highly desirable for CETPs designed for SMEs.Generally, options that require low personnel skill levels are preferred for CETP to options that requireshigh skills. This generally goes along with simplicity of operation and ease of maintenance.

� Adaptability to change in influent quality and flow rate

This is a very important criterion for CETPs designed for SMEs because wastewater quality and quantitytends to be more variable than for conventional municipal wastewater treatment.

� Ease and availability of major equipment

This is a primary consideration in the design. If the equipment is not available locally or regionally, or isnot available at a price that is reasonable due to high transportation costs, the option can be excludedfrom further consideration.

� Post installation service/chemical delivery

Systems that minimize post installation service for CETPs are desirable. If chemicals are used, it is criticalthat they be readily available.

� Energy utilization

Generally, options that require no or low energy are preferred for CETPs designed for SMEs to those thatare energy intensive.

9

Source: NEERI Report, 2002

Treatment Scheme of CETP Ankaleshwar

Primary Secondary

Tertiary

Fit for the purpose of

Treatment level

Contaminants removed

Wastewater Treatment processes

Solids treatment processes and outputs

Primary

Secondary

Tertiary

Advanced

Preliminary

Discharge into surface

water bodies

Reuse possibilities

•Screening

•Shredding

•Grit removal

•Pre-oxidation(chlorine/ozone)

Large floating suspended

solids & grit removed

Suspended

solids & some heavy

metals removed

Suspended

solids (e.g. biodegradable

organics, volatile organics)

and some nutrient

(N&P) removed

More nurient (N&P),

dissolved solids,

heavy metals & pathogens

(viruses, bacteria, protozoa,

helminthes)

Remove organics, salts,

ionic contaminants,

microorganisms, viruses

•Chemical precipitation•Electro-coagulation•Chemical oxidation•Anaerobic reactor

•Activated sludge process•Anaerobic reactors•Moving bed bio reactor•Sequential batch reactor•Oxidation/aeration pond•Catalytic oxidation

•Clarification•Filtration,•Activated carbon adsorption•Disinfection•Advanced oxidation

•Membrane filtration•Evaporation (2-5 stage)•Advanced oxidation

Sludge

treatment

•Thickening

•Stabilization

•Dewatering

•drying

•Sludge drying bead

•Solar evaporation

•Incineration

•Land Fill

Wastewater from Tannery, Textile, Chemicals, Pharmaceutical, dye & dye intermediates, Engineering units

Selection for technology based on effluent quality for CETPsSelection for technology based on effluent quality for CETPs

WWC High BOD Low BOD High COD

Hig

h T

DS

(Highly organic effluent fully

biodegradable)

•Anaerobic + aerobic /

•Incineration + secure landfill

(Organic salt, no need for

biological treatment )

•Solar, forced evaporation

•Membrane technologies

(Waste not easily biodegradable but

toxic)

•Thermal destruction

•Chemical treatment

•Chemical oxidation

•Evaporation + Secured landfill

Low

TD

S

Organic effluent, fully

biodegradable :-

•Anaerobic + aerobic treatment

(Low organic & inorganic

effluent)

•Recycle and reuse after

preliminary treatment

(Highly organic effluent not easily

biodegradable)

•Thermal destruction

•Chemical oxidation

•Chemical + biological treatment

- - Highly inorganic effluent, not suitable

for biological treatment :-

•Chemical recovery

•Chemical oxidation+ biological

treatment

Source: Common Effluent Treatment Plants-State of the Art, NEERI 1991, Sponsored by Ministry of Environment & Forests,

Technical EIA Guidance for Common Effluent Treatment Plants, ILFS Eco Smart Ltd, Hyderabad 2010, Prepared for Ministry of Environment & Forests.

12

Inlet effluent quality and discharge Standards for CETP

Parameters Influent Quality

pH 5.5 - 9.0

Temperature (oC) 45.0

Oil and grease 20.0

Cyanide 2.0

Ammoniacal-N 50.0

Phenolic compounds 5.0

Hexavalent Chromium 2.0

Total chromium 2.0

Copper 3.0

Nickel 3.0

Zinc 15.0

Lead 1.0

Arsenic 0.2

Mercury 0.01

Cadmium 1.0

Selenium 0.05

Fluoride 15.0

Boron 2.0

All values are expressed in mg/l, except pH and temperature.

Source:

The gazette of India: Extraordinary- Part II- Sec.3 (i) pp10 Dt. 27th Feb 1991

Parameters Effluent Discharge Standards for ISW

pH 5.5-9.0

SS 100

TDS 2100

COD 250

BOD (3d, 27°C) 30

Oil & Grease 10

Chlorides 600

Sulphates 1000

Phosphates 5

Ammoniacal-N 50

Fluoride 2.0

Arsenic 0.2

Cyanide 0.2

Mercury 0.01

Iron 3

Manganese 2

Chromium 2

Copper 3

Zinc 5

Nickel 3

Lead 0.1

Selenium 0.05

All values are expressed in mg/l, except pH

ISW-Inland Surface Waters.

12/15/2012

3

13

�Selection of an appropriate treatment option for optimum performance with due

consideration to investments requires comparison of different options with

respect to certain criteria.

�Parameter governing selection of wastewater treatment options

� Capital cost� O&M costs

� Treatment performance� Water recovery� Treatment time

� Foot print� Sludge production� Reject generation.

�Multicriterion analysis was adopted to aid in selection of optimum pre-treatment

technology. This technique is used to aid decision making in many environmental

issues which carries uncertainties associated with discrete and hazy

characteristics for ranking with moderate acceptability.

Ranking of technology options for Membrane Filtration Systems –

AA CaseCase StudyStudy ofof aa TextileTextile ClusterCluster

14

• Assessment of the pre-treatment modules for zero effluent liquid discharge was doneusing FAHP and MATLAB software to rank and select an optimum pre-treatment

module used in medium scale textile industries.• The major multicriteria parameters considered for decision making in ranking are

capital, operation & maintenance, footprint, performance and sludge generation.

• The AHP was achieved in four stages: decomposition, pair wise comparison ofdecision criteria, generation of priority vectors and synthesis.

• In the first step, the criteria was broken-down into a number of small constituent

elements followed by pair wise comparison of criteria within the elements using a setof rules, with Saaty nine point’s scale.

• The matrix A was formulated and the element of criteria to be evaluated was placed

at the upper triangle and the lower triangle of matrix is reciprocal of upper triangle.The diagonal of matrix is always one. The priority vector or weighted criterion wasderived normalizing matrix [A] across the row.

Pre-treatment moduleI : CP-PSF- ACF; II : CP-ASP-DMF; III : ASP-Cl; IV : CP-ASP-CPV : O3 - ASP - PSF – ACA; VI : EC - SBR – CP; VII : CO; VIII : CP - CP- CP-PSF-ACA

Ranking of technology options for Membrane Filtration Systems - AA CaseCaseStudyStudy ofof TextileTextile ClusterCluster

15

Approach to select the best pre-treatment module for membrane separation process

AHP - Analytical Hierarchy Process; PTM - Pre-treatment Module; MSF- Membership Function; FAHP- Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process

16

Performance Treatment option Efficiency (%)

High Chemical precipitation�bio-oxidation�chemical precipitation�sandfiltration �activated carbon adsorption

BOD : 84-93

COD : 80-90

SS : 77-98Chemical precipitation�bio-oxidation�sand filtration�dual media filtration

Chemical precipitation (3 stage)�media filtration�activated carbon adsorption

Ozonation�bio-oxidation�sand filtration�activated carbon adsorption.

Moderate Electro-coagulation�bio-oxidation�chemical precipitation�sand filtration�activated carbon adsorption.

BOD : 68-79COD : 60-73SS : 64-78

Low Bio-oxidation�sand filtration�dual media filtration�activated carbon adsorption

BOD : 56-70

COD : 48-65

SS : 52-74Chemical precipitation�sand filtration�activated carbon adsorption

Catalytic oxidation BOD : 24-25

COD : 21-23

SS : 56-60

Performance of primary, secondary and tertiary treatmentPerformance of primary, secondary and tertiary treatment

Pre-treatment moduleI : OZ - ASP - PSF – ACFII : CP-ASP-CP - PSF - ACFIII : CP-ASP-PSF-DMF-MF

Final Ranking of Pre-treatment Technologies based on the study

17

Areas for improvement in CETPs Areas for improvement in CETPs

• Reduce pollutant loads received by the CETP through adoption of in-house keeping, cleaner technologies

resulting in lower treatment cost.

• Induction of energy efficient technologies particularly in oxygen transfer in activated sludge process

(diffused aeration systems), gas transfer, solids separation and thermal decomposition.

• Replacement of major energy intensive electrical components with high efficiency motors for aerators,

blowers, pumps and centrifuges e.g. variable-frequency drives.

• Development of energy efficient advanced oxidation for organic and recalcitrant compounds in

wastewater.

• Improvements in membrane performance and development of lower pressure waste water specific

membranes (e.g. reduced fouling, increased flux, improved rejection, increased longevity, etc.).

• Concentrate/reject treatment and disposal strategies for zero liquid discharge schemes.

• Improvements and cost reductions in thermal processes for chemicals and energy recovery such as

evaporation and plasma incineration.

• Installation of SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) based systems for better operational and

management control of the CETPs.

• Combined heat and power (CHP) as an option to generate energy/power.

• Utilization of sludge/solids as raw material for construction activities after ascertaining its properties.

18Source: greenpeace.org, http://www.worldbanktribunal.org/1

....Despite widespread acknowledgement that CETPs cannot clean poisonous industrial wastewaters

Indian express

http://tirupurgarmentcity.blogspot.in/

NAME OF CHEMICALS IMPACT ON HUMANS

Organochlorinecompound

Disturbs endocrine activity specially thyroid activity, causes risk of type II debates

Chlorinated naphthalene Saviour skin rashes and liver disease

Chlorinated toluene Affect nervous system and Causes mortality

Hexachlorobenzene Causes kidney and liver problemand increase the risk of cancer

Polychlorinated biphenyl Affects immune system, reproductive system, endocrine system.

12/15/2012

4

Cost of Operation & Management in CETPSCost of Operation & Management in CETPS

19

Industry CAPITAL

COST

(Rs /MLD)

OM COST

(Rs/m3 )

Treatment technology Source

Tanneries 80 21-66 CCPT, ASP, RO, Sludge

handling

https://www.elaw.

org/system/files/In

dia2000.pdf

Textile

(Bleaching &

Dyeing)

42 20-120 CCPT, AO,ASP, RO, EVP,

SLM

CPCB, 2005

& NEERI Report

2011

Heterogeneous

effluents

51-87 12-25 CCPT, ASP, PSF, ACF CPCB, 2005

ConclusionConclusion

� A worldwide attention has been directed towards protection of water supplies

and aquatic ecosystems due environmental damages, litigation and water

shortages due to improper treatment and discharge.

� A country like India is in need of advanced wastewater management process, to

avoid environmental damages in future, which comes at a price. Hence there is

the need of CETP’S for SME’s. As far as possible CETPs may be designed and

proposed keeping homogeneous effluent nature.

� New technologies offers significantly higher pollutant removal rates and are

capable of elimination of majority of hazardous pollutants. Technologies based

on pressure-driven membranes, new adsorbents, electro coagulation, advanced

oxidation and ion exchange systems offer higher pollutant reduction rates. They

are expected to become the predominant treatment technologies in the near

future.

� Reuse and recycle of water in all sectors have intensified in India across tannery,

textile, electroplating, chemicals, pharmaceutical and dye units. Attention should

be devoted to the technologies where sludge production is low, clean and

possibly safely disposed/used.

� Combined heat and power (CHP) as an option may be proposed in CETPS intaking

organic wastes (Eg. Tanneries).

1

Page 1

Best Available Techniques for Common Wastewater Treatment (CWWT) /

Management Systems

R.Hrishikesh Mahadev

GIZ, Hyderabad

15/12/2012 Page 2

What is BAT ?

15/12/2012

B‘best’ in relation to techniques, means the most effective in achieving a high general level of protection of the

environment as a whole

A

‘available techniques’ means those techniques developed on a scale which allows implementation in the relevant

class of activity under economically the technically viable conditions, taking into consideration the costs and

advantages, whether or not the techniques are used or produced within the State, as long as they are reasonably

accessible to the person carrying out the activity

T‘techniques’ includes both the technology used and the way in which the installation is designed, built , managed,

maintained, operated and decommissioned.

Page 3

BAT Reference Document


» The BREF (Best Available Techniques reference document) on waste water and waste gas treatment and management in the chemical sector reflects

information exchange carried out under Article 16(2) of Council Directive 96/61/EC (European Commission).

» Thus, the scope of the document comprises:

• the application of environmental management systems and tools

• the application of the treatment technology for waste water and waste gas as it is

commonly used or applicable in the chemical sector, including the treatment technology for waste water sludge, as long as it is operated on the chemical industry site

• the identification of or conclusion on best available techniques based on the two

preceding items, resulting in a strategy of optimum pollution reduction and, under

appropriate conditions, in BAT-associated emission levels at the discharge point to the

environment.

Page 4

Contents of BREF


» Preface, Scope

» General information

» Consumption and Emission levels of Central Wastewater

Treatment Plants

» Common Techniques to consider in the Determination of BAT

» BAT conclusions for Common Wastewater/ Waste Gas Treatment / Management in the Chemical Sector

» Concluding Remarks and Recommendation for future Work

» References and Glossary of Terms

http://eippcb.jrc.es/reference/

Page 5

Parameters considered for CWWT


» COD

» TOC» BOD

» TSS

» Metals• Cadmium

• Total Chromium

• Chromium VI• Copper

• Mercury

• Nickel• Lead

• Zinc

» Nitrogen Compounds

• Total Nitrogen• Ammonia

• Nitrite

• Nitrate» Phosphorous

• Total Phosphorous

• Phosphate» Phenols

» Chlorides

» Sulphates» Cyanides

» Toxicity

Page 6

Wastewater Management


» EMS: It is technique allowing operators to address environmental issues in a systematic and demonstrable

way.

» Management Tools: To operate EMS around the loop several kinds of tools are used;

• Inventory Management: detailed information

about the location, environmental circumstances, emissions etc.

• Operation Management: helps in planning, designing, operating and improving pollution

prevention and treatment facilities

• Strategic Management: organization and operation of release handling in a integrated

manner

• Safety and Emergency: necessary for troubleshooting in case of emergencies

2

Page 7

Wastewater Treatment Techniques


» Process integrated Measures

» Balancing of Flow / concentration

» Storage or retention capacity

» End of pipe techniques (EOP)

• Neutralization

• Insoluble contaminants / Mechanical Separation

• Soluble non-bio-degradable / physio-chemical treatment

• Soluble bio-degradable contaminants / biological Treatment

• Rainwater and firefighting water

» Sludge Treatment

Page 8

How BAT Conclusions are implemented


» In general, the BAT Conclusions have to be transposed to permit

conditions by the Competent Authorities

» In order to facilitate the granting of permits, Member States may set

requirements for certain categories of installations in general binding rules

• General binding rules shall also be based on the best

available techniques, without prescribing the use of any technique or specific technology

• General binding rules have to be updated to take into account developments in best available techniques

http://eippcb.jrc.es/reference/

Page 915.12.2012

R. Hrishikesh Mahadev

Indo German Environment Partnership (IGEP) ProgrammeJunior Advisor

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH GIZ-ASEM Cell, 8th Floor, Parisrama Bhawan,

Basheerbagh, Hyderabad – 500 004

T +91 40 2323 3677

F +91 40 2323 3677M +91 8008 885 444

E: [email protected]: www.asemindia.com; www.giz.de

1

Page 1L & T Ramboll Consulting Engineers Limited 17/12/2012

Planning of CETPs in New Industrial Estates / SEZs

November 2012

C . V. Sundara Rajan

L&T Ramboll Consulting Engineers Limited

Hyderabad


PLANNING PROCEEDURES & REQUIREMENTS

• Detailed Master planning

• Planning proceedures & Requirements

• Eco industrial concept

• Operational EMP

• Technology selcetion

• Social factors and best practices


DETAILED MASTER PLANNING –A KEY SUCCESS FACTOR

• Conceptual ( Feasibility studies) and detailed master planning

• Eco industrial concept is a catalyst to make things happen

• Planning with great care will resolve the issue of ‘heterogenous‘ nature of the effluent from diffrent industries

• Also resolve the main issue of toxic substances and other heavy metals entering in to the streams


PLANNING PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS OF CETPs

• Pre feasibility studies and Environmental screening

• Conceptual Planning /Feasibilitiy studies

• Detailed Master planning

• Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)

• Environmental Managmet Plan

• Regulatory Approvals and clearances


ECO INDUSTRIAL CONCEPT

• This is a catalyst to make things happen

• It is a community of manufacturing and service businesses

• Located together on a common property

• Members seek enhanced environmental, economic, and social performance

• Through collaboration in managing environmental and resource issues

Page 6

Safety/Hazard considerations

Environment sensitivity

Existing & allotted industries in SEZ

Existing development in the

region

Pollution

Retrofits and new strategies

Efficiently share resources

Increase economic gains

Reduce waste and pollution

Achieve sustainable development

Improve environmental quality

Safety Concerns

ECO-INDUSTRIAL PARK CONCEPT...

L & T Ramboll Consulting Engineers Limited

2

Page 7

OPERATIONAL EMP• Is in an implementable format or mechanism with clear

definition and boundaries

• It Defines who will do? what will do ? and at what cost ?

• When it will be done? And at what frequency ?

• It Defines the institutional mechanism involved

• What is the capacity required and what training required and where it is available?

• Who will - construct ? Supervise ? and operate ?

• Who will be responsible to ensure ?

• Defines entire reporting mechanism ?

• What – codes? Standards ? and specifications ? apply

17/12/2012 L & T Ramboll Consulting Engineers Limited Page 8

TECHNOLOGY SELECTION

• Up to date technology selection - a key factor

• Choice of Treatment technologies

• Cost effective from both capital and running

costs

• Meeting regulatory discharge standards

• It should be sustainable with shock loads

• A fail proof Technology

17/12/2012 L & T Ramboll Consulting Engineers Limited

Page 9

SOCIAL FACTORS & ETHICAL STANDARDS APPLY

• Need to allot strictly zone wise – Discipline is the standard

• Ensure performance – Hand picked officers

• Social commitments to deliver taking lessons from major National social issues

• Correct attitude of ‘individual’ units matters

• Ensue collective ethical standards

17/12/2012 L & T Ramboll Consulting Engineers Limited Page 10

WHAT THE PLANNING WITH ECO INDUSTRIAL CONCEPT CAN ACHIEVE ?

� This can;

• Bring in high level of disciplines and code of practices for addressing institutional and operational issues

• Considerable reduction in treatment cost

• Make industry achieve economics of scale in waste treatment thereby reducing the cost of pollution reduction for individual Units

L & T Ramboll Consulting Engineers Limited

Page 11

WHAT THE PLANNING WITH ECO INDUSTRIAL CONCEPT CAN ACHIEVE ?

L & T Ramboll Consulting Engineers Limited 17/12/2012

• Resolve the problem of lack of space

• To solve the problem of efficient monitoring at all levels

• Can also address the issue of disposal of treated wastes and sludge and

• to improve the recycling/reuse possibilities

Page 12

CASE EXAMPLE - APSEZ IN AP

• APSEZ- Trying to adopt the proposed system to the extend possible

• All studies including Detailed Master planning carried out for APSEZ to the extend possible

• GIZ (Formerly GTZ) and BTS also contributed as important players and to bring in international good practices and systems

3

Page 13

Thank you

1

Page 1

Your logo

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF CETP

JNPC, VIZAG


Dr K.Srinivas, Head TechnicalRamky Enviro Engineers Limited

Page 2

Your logo

JNPC a Unique SPV of its kind


• JNPC is a public-private partnership park at Visakhapatnam by

GOAP and Ramky Group of industries

• This park has been developed for specific industries like bulk

drugs, pharmaceuticals & fine chemicals by RPCIL and APIIC

• This park has access to sea port, air port, national highways

and railways.

• JNPC has world class common infrastructure, common utilities

and basic amenities

• This park has single window clearance for all its environmental clearances from MoEF, GoI.

Page 3

Your logo

Environment Management System at JNPC


• Solid and liquid effluents generated by member industries are

disposed at JNPC common treatment facilities

• Treatment facilities being provided for effluents based on their characteristics for

• high TDS effluents

• low TDS effluents

• Cyanide wastes

• metal bearing sledges

Page 4

Your logo

Cyanide and Metal bearing sludges


• Dedicated reactors are used for the treatment of cyanide and

metal bearing waste.

• This is carried out in batch process and wastes are also

transported to the common facilities through dedicated tankers

Page 5

Your logo

High TDS Effluent Stream


• Transported through dedicated lines

• Quality is checked at the outlet of the member industry

• Treatment methodology

• API separator (O&G)

• Equalisation Tank

• Air stripper

• Clariflocculator

• Multiple Effect Evaporator

• Spray Drier

• Salts to SLF; condensate to LTDS stream

Page 6

Your logo

Low TDS Effluent Stream


• Designed capacity 4.5 MLD for treatment of pre-treated effluents

• Treatment Methodology

• API separator for O&G

• Equalization tank

• Air stripper

• Flash Mixer

• Clariflocculator

• High rate solids contact clarifier

• Sequential Batch Reactor

• Sand and Carbon filters

• Guard pond

• Marine Outfall

2

Page 7

Your logo

Sequential Batch Reactor


• It is a cyclic activated biological treatment process

• Mainly intended for removal of BOD and COD

• Basic steps are

• Aeration

• Settling

• Nitrification

• Denitrification

• PLC based works on on-line measurement of DO levels

• All the processes are carried out in one tank

• Each cycle time is 4 hours

Page 8

Your logo

Tertiary Treatment


• Treated wastewater from SBR are collected in Filter Feed Tank

and pumped to Tertiary Treatment System

• Pressure Sand Filter and Activated Carbon Filter helps in final treatment before discharged into Marine Outfall

Page 9

Your logo

Marine Outfall


• Disposal of effluents after treatment in the sea

• HDPE pipeline 355 mm dia

• Length 16 km on shore and 1.8 km offshore

• Diffuser depth 18 m

• Pipeline capacity 8 MLD each

Page 10

Your logo

Integrated Waste Water Treatment Support Systems


• Multiple Effect Evaporator followed by Spray Drier for High TDS

effluents

Page 11

Your logo



• Hazardous Waste Incinerator for disposal of oily and other high

calorific wastes

Page 12

Your logo



• Secured landfill is used for the

disposal of

• salt from the high TDS

stream

• Excess bio-mass / sludge

from low TDS stream

• Any other hazardous waste

which need waste

stabilization / solidification

3

Page 13

Your logo

JNPC CETP - Plan


Off shore Pharma Units

Effluent Collection

CETP (12 MLD)

Diffuser

- 15 Mt.

Marine Out fall

Incinerator

Page 14

Your logo

Performance of CETP


Parameter CETP Inlet After primary After secondary

CETP out let

pH 6.5-8.5 6.8 - 7.2 7.8 - 8.3 7.0 - 8.5

COD mg/lit 4000- 8000 3500 - 5000 400 - 550 175 - 235

BOD mg/lit 2000 - 4500 1500 - 2500 45 - 60 20 - 35

Oil & Grease mg/lit 10 – 15 Nil Nil Nil

TSS mg/lit 200- 600 50 - 80 30 - 60 20 – 40

Ammonical Nitrogen 20 - 50 20 - 50 20 - 30 10 - 25

Page 15

Your logo


Thank You

12/17/2012

1

(A SUCCESS STORY)

PETL IS ESTABLISHED AS CETP IN 1989.

STARTED WORKING FROM 1994

CAPACITY : 7500 M3

PRESENT UTILISATION : 2500 M3

CAPACITY of dedicated pipeline to : 5000 M3

carry the treated effluents to STP,Amberpet.

INLET PARAMETERS UNITS STANDARD ACTUAL

PH 5.5 to 9.0 6.50 to 7.50

Total Dissolved inorganic solids mg / l 5000 3000

Chemical oxygen demand mg / l 15000 3500

Ammonical Nitrogen mg / l 50 35

Oil & Grease mg / l 20 10

OUTLET PARAMETERS UNITS STANDARD ACTUAL

PH 5.5 to 9.0 7.0 to 8.0

Total Dissolved inorganic solids mg / l 2100 1700

Total suspended solids mg / l 100 50

Chemical oxygen demand mg / l 250 200

Biochemical oxygen demand mg / l 30 16

Ammonical Nitrogen mg / l 50 1 to 5

Oil & Grease mg / l 10 1. to 5

The standards fixed for accepting effluent tankers at CETP, Patancheru

from time to time are as under

1. Earlier to taking over in 1996 Inlet TDS >40000 mg/l

2 After taking over the management by

industries in 1997

Inlet TDS <20000 mg/l

3 Subsequently reduced to Inlet TDS <15000 mg/l

4 Subsequently, as per the Hon’ble

Supreme Court directions during

1998

Inlet TDS

Inlet COD

pH

Suspended

Solids

<15000 mg/l

<15000 mg/l

6.5- 8.5

<1000 mg/l

5 Subsequently as per Hon’ble

Supreme Court order in 2007

Inlet TDS

Inlet COD

<5000 mg/l

<15000 mg/l

The reduction in the Pollution load achieved from time to time can be gauged

from the following analysis.

Sl.

No Results of CETP

No.of

Tankers

Received

10 KL

Pollution Load

Inlet Outlet

COD

MT

TDS

MT

COD

MT

TDS

MT

1 Before taking over PETL from APIIC in

1996

28383.68 11353 11353 2838 7096

2 After taking over PETL by industries in

1997

49040 7356 9808 2452 5885

3 Average Organic/inorganic load during the

calendar year

2001 57817 5782 8673 1214 5782

2002 62142 5593 8700 932 5593

2003 59832 5086 7180 1017 5385

2004 58541 4683 5854 1054 4683

2005 58637 4105 5277 1055 4368

The reduction in the Pollution load achieved from time to time can be

gauged from the following analysis.

It may be seen that organic pollution in terms of MT in 1996 was 2838 MT is

now (2011) reduced to 91.6 MT.

Sl.

No

Results of CETP

No.of Tankers

Received

10 KL

Pollution Load

Inlet Outlet

COD

MT

TDS

MT

COD

MT

TDS

MT

2006 52335 2955 3435 803 2798

2007 57342 3727 3683 1081 3668

2008 60513 3783 3314 1273 2850

2009 40859 1323 1173 198 811

2010 43906 1411 1018 95 742

2011 46489 1498 1079 91.6 723

12/17/2012

2

MONTHYEAR

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

10 KL capacity

January 4472 4894 4950 3217 3661 3917

February 4004 4687 3506 3197 3406 3894

March 4411 4526 3780 3530 4630 4068

April 4068 4518 2996 3228 3865 4145

May 4115 4660 3055 3327 3878 4160

June 4627 4976 2945 3417 4089 4316

July 5216 5299 3419 3666 4031 4765

August 5485 5527 3387 4089 3976 4809

September 5267 5440 3214 4010 3691 4242

October 5268 5471 3261 4162 4144 3852

November 5312 5285 3280 3969 3690 0

December 5097 5230 3066 4094 3428 0

TOTAL 57342 60513 40859 43906 46489 38316

Avg./ day 157 165 112 120 127 140

80% of Effluents received from Bulk Drug Industries, Intermediates and other chemical Units

and 20% of Effluents received from non-Bulk Drug industries.

HON’BLE SUPREME COURT ORDER (1998):

Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in a public interest litigation case on

environment and pollution control in Patancheru Industrial belt issued

directions to lay a 18 km Pipe Line from M/s.Pattancheru Enviro Tech Limited

(PETL), CETP to K & S Main, Balanagar for carrying the treated effluents to

sewer standards.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court also stipulated Inlet standards for this CETP.

Inlet TDS <15000 mg/l

Inlet COD <15000 mg/l

pH 6.5- 8.5

Suspended Solids <1000 mg/l

M/s.PETL compiled with the above directions of Hon’ble Supreme Court.

COMMITTEE APPOINTED BY APPCB WITH PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY, (EFS & T) AS CHAIRMAN IN MARCH 2003.

The Committee visited Ramachandrapuram, Patancheru, Pocharam and Kandi

villages and got the ground water samples from the affected villages due to

pollution by APPCB, Panchayatraj Dept. (Rural Water Supply) and ground water

Dept. The committee noted that the affected 22 villages are under three

categories.

a). Villages affected by industrial pollution

b). Villages affected but not by Industrial pollution

c). Villages affected partly due to industrial pollution and due to other reasons

i.e., presence of fluorides in the water due to natural reasons.

The Committee observed that their study indicated that water pollution is not as

severe as it was earlier.

The Committee also expressed that the interpretation of results has subjectively

since certain factors such as location of the source, type of pollution, water

sheds, drainage and soil etc., have also be considered.

LAYING OF 18 K.M PIPE LINE:

As per the direction of Hon’ble Supreme Court at the instance of A.P.State

Govt. HMWS&SM finalized tenders after preparing the estimate for 12.5

crores for laying 18 km Pipe Line from PETL plant site to K & S Main,

Balanagar for pumping the treated effluents. The effluent further will reach

through Hyderabad sewer lines ultimately to STP at Amberpet. It was noted

that as per environment assessment. Report submitted by JNTU, there will

be no adverse impact in mixing the treated effluent with sewage water on the

environment and ecological balances of the area. The Pipe Line has been

laid and commissioned on 07.07.2009.

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE OF M/S.PETL (2009 – 2012)

The compliance of inlet and outlet standards formulated by regulatory authority

by PETL is seen from the following analysis report.

Month TSS (mg/L) TDIS (mg/L) COD (mg/L) BOD (mg/L) NH4 +

(mg/L)

Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet

STANDARD - 100 5000 2100 15000 500 - 30 50.00 50.00

April 2009 562 47 2607 1559 2864 274 1453 22 37.00 71.00

May 2009 396 45 2114 1527 2914 236 1497 22 37.00 39.00

June 2009 628 43 2566 1707 2141 211 1086 19 30.00 10.00

July 2009 641 40 2692 1789 2397 191 1198 17 31.90 1.14

August 2009 690 38 2601 1700 2578 175 1286 15 32.81 3.39

September

2009

728 35 2193 1255 2307 147 1158 12 32.06 2.49

October 2009 699 37 2203 1366 2508 180 1239 17 31.37 1.55

November

2009

688 36 2459 1758 2717 213 1324 22 32.07 1.51

December

2009

602 35 2471 1733 2896 277 1411 27 32.03 2.17

January 2010 500 37 2405 1681 3120 251 1449 21 33.73 1.98

February 2010 456 36 2316 1672 2980 248 1385 20 33.30 1.71

March 2010 450 35 2354 1773 3133 219 1443 14 32.29 1.30


(mg/L)


STANDARD - 100 5000 2100 15000 500 - 30 50.00 50.00

April 2010 451 41 2327 1765 2988 214 1350 12 31.95 1.47

May 2010 465 45 2302 1768 3074 231 1344 16 32.84 1.34

June 2010 459 43 2267 1661 3139 214 1330 14 32.61 1.30

July 2010 486 48 2296 1643 3146 206 1336 13 32.88 1.12

August 2010 448 41 2277 1528 2945 197 1212 11 33.49 1.05

September 2010 443 38 2306 1547 3131 201 1283 15 33.73 1.06

October 2010 448 43 2326 1743 3208 201 1308 14 33.78 1.20

November 2010 445 46 2302 1740 3347 200 1376 15 33.03 1.10

December 2010 456 46 2349 1803 3360 213 1371 20 33.65 1.38

January 2011 434 41 2339 1762 3528 215 1430 22 34.29 1.91

February 2011 423 41 2305 1692 3366 214 1356 20 33.73 1.71

March 2011 384 25 2372 1788 3133 187 1276 13 32.89 1.41

12/17/2012

3


(mg/L)


STANDARD - 100 5000 2100 15000 250 - 30 50.00 50.00

April 2011 382 45 2349 1630 3067 198 1253 12 32.23 1.45

May 2011 371 46 2321 1511 3099 191 1261 9 31.62 1.45

June 2011 374 46 2350 1563 3147 192 1287 11 31.09 1.34

July 2011 374 45 2337 1518 3149 187 1272 9 31.85 1.42

August 2011 368 48 2287 1420 3208 189 1290 11 32.41 1.57

September 2011 374 52 2288 1412 3211 188 1300 11 32.77 1.68

October 2011 413 55 2306 1483 3195 207 1301 16 33.47 2.16

November 2011 441 50 2304 1433 3256 195 1314 13 32.41 1.87

December 2011 455 51 2305 1455 3311 197 1362 17 33.15 2.14


(mg/L)


STANDARD - 100 5000 2100 15000 250 - 30 50.00 50.00

January 2012 452 50 2294 1403 3203 186 1277 11 31.43 1.69

Feb. 2012 448 51 2353 1539 3114 188 1265 15 31.99 1.74

March 2012 470 53 2380 1606 3190 192 1295 17 31.93 1.72

April 2012 456 50 2372 1658 3120 183 1247 12 30.59 1.67

May 2012 477 51 2442 1592 3172 178 1269 12 31.71 1.91

June 2012 471 50 2424 1644 3213 189 1283 13 33.85 2.56

July 2012 474 50 2294 1440 3311 190 1360 13 33.98 3.86

August 2012 472 52 2332 1492 3339 214 1389 18 35.55 12.24

September 2012 461 53 2325 1427 3325 197 1369 16 35.20 16.56

October 2012 464 54 2319 1485 3381 202 1414 19 35.91 10.14

The steps taken by the industry for pre treatment of the effluents and efforts

made to send the effluent conforming to inlet standards prescribed can be

appreciated from the following statement indicating significant reduction in

the no. of rejected tankers for non compliance of standards.

S.No Month No.of tankers

(10 M3) received

No.of tankers

(10 M3)

rejected

Rejected Tankers as

% to tankers

received.

01 April 2009 2996 215 7.17

02 May 2009 3055 30 0.98

03 June 2009 2945 06 0.20

04 July 2009 3419 00 0.00

05 August 2009 3387 12 0.35

06 September 2009 3214 09 0.28

07 October 2009 3261 07 0.21

08 November 2009 3280 07 0.21

09 December 2009 3066 06 0.19

10 January 2010 3217 04 0.12

11 February 2010 3197 01 0.03

12 March 2010 3530 04 0.11

S.

N

o

Month No.of tankers

(10 M3) received

No.of tankers

(10 M3) rejected

Rejected Tankers

as % to tankers

received.

13 April 2010 3228 02 0.06

14 May 2010 3327 00 0.00

15 June 2010 3417 02 0.06

16 July 2010 3666 02 0.055

17 August 2010 4089 02 0.049

18 September 2010 4010 00 0.00

19 October 2010 4162 05 0.12

20 November 2010 3969 00 0.00

21 December 2010 4094 04 0.098

22 January 2011 3661 04 0.11

23 February 2011 3406 06 0.176

24 March 2011 4633 02 0.043

25 April 2011 3865 04 0.103

26 May 2011 3878 05 0.129

27 June 2011 4089 01 0.024

S.No Month No.of tankers

(10 M3) received

No.of tankers

(10 M3) rejected

Rejected

Tankers as % to

tankers received.

28 July 2011 4031 04 0.099

29 August 2011 3976 00 0.00

30 September 2011 3691 00 0.00

31 October 2011 4144 00 00

32 November 2011 3690 12 0.325

33 December 2011 3428 5 0.145

34 January 2012 3917 4 0.102

35 February 2012 3894 Nil 0.00

36 March 2012 4068 2 0.049

37 April 2012 4145 2 0.048

38 May 2012 4160 0 0.00

39 June 2012 4316 0 0.00

40 July 2012 4765 2 0.042

41 August 2012 4809 0 0.00

42 September 2012 4242 0 0.00

43 October 2012 3852 8 0.207

APPCB ANALYSIS:

APPCB also analyzed the PETL effluents at its inlet and outlet and the

results corroborate the analysis of M/s.PETL. This evidences the

journey of improvement and performance.

UPGRADATION OF THE TREATMENT PLANT:

M/s.PETL besides improving the treatment process, up-graded the plant

at a cost of Rs.13.22 crores under “Industrial Infrastructure Up-gradation

Scheme” of Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Dept. Industrial policy

and promotion, Govt. of India.

12/17/2012

4

The new R & D building constructed under the above scheme is now

functional.

The Laboratory is equipped with on-line monitoring service and

State of Art equipment. The important equipment installed are as

follows:

�On-line TOC meter

�VOC meter

�Atomic Absorption Spectro Photometer

�Weather monitoring equipment

�Elemental Analyzer

�Digital Display of performance results

�HPLC & GC equipment

�Ammonical Nitrogen distillation unit

�Flow Meter, Decanter, Clarifloculator

�Other Laboratory equipment for daily analysis of samples.

IMPROVING THE PROCESS CONTROL THROUGH NEW

TECHNOLOGIES:

While taking measures for improving the performance through process

control, PETL explored new technologies for further improving the

outlet parameters. These efforts resulted in identifying MBR

Technology for further reduction of Organic load (COD). Action has

been taken to order the equipment for ultra filtration through

Membrane Bio-reactor technology. It is commissioned on December,

2010.

The various steps taken and efforts made usher in bringing new

technologies and acted as booster dose for rejuvenation and significant

improvement in the treatment of effluents and help the pollution

control and ecological balance of this industrial hub.

A NOTE ON OPERATIONS OF M/S.PETL

The concept of Common Effluent Treatment Plant emerged as a necessity

consequent upon industrial development in Pattancheru Industrial belt.

The various incentives offered by Government of Andhra Pradesh created

a hub of activity in this area during 1970-80. Thus, Patancheru is

reckoned on the industrial map. The establishment of Chemical,

Pharmaceutical industries brought a distinction to this area and has

become an address for bulk-drug manufacturers. It is a known fact that

with this development, pollution has become an issue.

To overcome the pollution problem, and maintain the ecological balance

in Patancheru, the industrial units, in particular, pharmaceutical and bulk

drug units with the encouragement from Andhra Pradesh Industrial

Infrastructure Corporation Limited (APIIC) floated a company in 1989 –

M/s PATTANCHERU ENVIRO TECH LIMITED under the provisions of

Indian Companies Act, 1956. The objective being establishment of a

common effluent treatment plant for treating the industrial effluents

emanating from this industrial belt for Pollution Control

M/s Associated Industrial Consultants Limited reputed and experienced

consultants in environment and pollution control prepared the project

report and a Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) was established

with a capacity of 7500 m3 per day.

The cost of the project was Rs. 5.70 Crores. The Plant started its

operations in 1994 and the management of the plant was taken over from

APIIC by the directors representing industry. An amount of Rs. 3.00

Crores was spent subsequently for upgrading the treatment facilities in

the CETP. Liquid Oxygen injection technology was adopted for the first

time in the country for biological treatment in a CETP. This CETP is

incurring an amount of Rs.45.00 lakhs every month for treating the

industrial effluents

The development of industries in patancheru industrial belt in the last

three decades resulted in high economic growth evidencing marked raise

in standard of life and living environment. The socio economic growth

created ample employment opportunities for the local persons.

The pollution load has significantly reduced on account of various measures

taken by the industry and CETP as per the Joint Action Plan 17-07-2007

implementation.

The work on the Pipe line project was started on 05-09-2002 and the 22.5 Km

pipeline completed in 2006. Pipe line was commissioned on 07-08-2009.

UNIT WISE DETAILS OF CETP, PATANCHERU

We receive about 100 – 130 no. of pre-treated effluent tankers (1000 – 1300

cum. of effluents) from member industries and about 1000 – 1300 cum

sewage water from adjacent Iskavagu. The tankers received at CETP for

treatment are checked for various parameters like pH, TDS and various

parameters before un-loading.

UNIT OPERATIONS:

1. Receiving Sump & Terminal Pumping Station:

Pre-treated effluents received by road tankers are tested / analysed for inlet

standards and unloaded in the sump. The influents are pumped to

Equalization Tanks, to equalize the effluents.

2. Equalization Tanks:

We have 4 Nos of Equalization Tanks to store the effluents for about 2-3 days.

Equalization Tanks are provided with aeration grid and air blower to equalize

the influents and to strip of any organic volatile matter. The effluents from

equalization tanks are being pumped to Clarifloculator / D A F through Flash

Mixer after addition of alum and poly electrolyte.

3. Clarifloculator & Flash Mixer Unit:

This unit is used to remove suspended solids from the influents. The

treatment chemical like Alum is use for coagulating the S.S and these solids

are separated. The suspended solids removed are collected in a sludge storage

tank. The sludge separated is sent to Decanter – 1 (centrifuge) for further

separation of liquids and solids in the form of cake. The clarified effluents

from Clarifloculator flow to Buffer Tanks by gravity.

12/17/2012

5

4. Decanter No. 1 (Centrifuge):

The suspended solids removed in Clarifloculator / DAF with 1- 2%

concentration are pumped to Primary Decanter. Polyelectrolyte

solution is added to improve separation efficiency. In this unit

sludge is separated into clear liquid and solid cake. The clarified

water (Centrate) goes to Buffer Tanks, for further treatment. The

sludge cake is collected in TSDF containers / and disposed to TSDF,

Dundigal.

Filter Press is provided as a standby unit to Decanter during

maintenance of Decanter.

5. Sludge Drying Beds (13 Nos.):

The sludge cake from Decanter – 1 (Primary decanter) is disposed to

TSDF, Dundigal.

6. Buffer Tanks :

The clarified effluents from Clarifloculator / DAF unit are collected in

these tanks. The raw sewage from adjacent Iskavagu is mixing with

clarified effluents in these tanks. Diffused aeration is provided to

maintain homogeneous conditions for further treatment (for better

mixing and to increase pre aeration). The sewage is added to improve

the biological treatment efficiency in the next units, as a constant seed

in Aeration Tanks.

7. Aeration Tanks:

There are 2 nos. of Aeration Tanks, with a capacity of 4,300 cum each.

4 Nos. of 50 HP and 6 Nos. of Floating Aerators each capacity 30 H.P.

Surface Aerators are provided to supply oxygen from air and to

maintain required dissolved oxygen in aeration tanks. Oxygen is

controlled by checking the D.O. levels in Aeration Tanks at regular

intervals.

The influents of Aeration Tank are biodegraded by micro – organisms

(MLSS / MLVSS) present in the Aeration Tank, there by reducing the

pollution loads, BOD & COD. As a result, the micro-organisms multiply

and MLSS levels are maintained in the Aeration Tank by recirculation of

sludge from next unit (SST) and also wastage of excess sludge.

8. Secondary Settling Tanks :

The outlet of the Aeration Tank is connected to Secondary Settling Tanks,

which receives the treated effluents from Aeration Tank along with the

Biological sludge in the form of Suspended Solids. The MLSS settles at

the bottom in the form of sludge. Settled sludge is re-circulated back to

Aeration Tanks to maintain MLSS levels in the Aeration Tanks. The

excess sludge is waste through Decanter – 2. The clarified water from

Secondary Settling Tanks is pumped to teritiary treatment i.e., MBR

Technology / storage tank.

9. Decanter – 2 (Centrifuge) :

The excess sludge produced in Aeration Tanks is collected in Secondary

Settling Tanks at the bottom, which is sent to Sludge pit of Decanter, for

wastage. The sludge is separated as sludge cake and clarified water in

the Decanter. The clarified water goes back to Aeration Tank and the

sludge cake is transferred to Secured Land Fill Unit.

Filter Press is provided as a standby unit to Decanter during

maintenance of Decanter.

MBR TECHNOLOGY (TERTIARY TREATMENT) :

Designed capacity 2500 m3 / day supplied by M/s.GE. The clarified

water from secondary settling tanks pumping to MBR Plant as a feed.

UF Membranes provide a physical barrier that prevents passage of

bacterial organisms and solids in to the water supply. The Zee weed 500

d membrane modules have a nominal pore size of 0.04 um and reject

particles or suspended particles larger than this, which includes bacteria

and some viruses

As a result high quality water can be produce with nominal chemical

addition and treatment Total Suspended Solids removal efficiency is 95 %

and further COD reduction up to 45 %. The treated water from MBR Plant

collected in Storage Tank (HMWS&SB) for pumping to STP, Amberpet for

further treatment.

1

Page 1

Your logo


Management Aspects of CETP

By

K R Desai

CEO

Narmada Clean Tech Limited

(a Subsidiary Unit Of GIDC – GUJARAT)

Presentation is my own views 23/11/2012

Page 2

Your logo

Background


� No industry can survive without expansion and diversification

� Regulatory allows expansions and new set ups in the estates, if

development is sustainable

� Estate is evaluated in totality so far as environment protection

is concerned

Page 3

Your logo


Management Aspects of CETP

� Achievement of pre set objectives

� Operational control

� EMPs keeping entire estate in to consideration for consistent

compliance of statutory requirements

� CETP should have strict and strategic policy to accept pollutant

load from member industries as per the inlet designed criteria.

� Capital and revenue collection strategy

� Anticipation of future needs and to have proactive approach

Page 4

Your logo

Objectives of CETP

• To achieve ‘Economics of scale’ in waste treatment, thereby

reducing the cost of pollution abatement for individual factory

• To minimize problems like…..

- lack of technical expertise

- non availability of trained personnel

- non availability of sufficient space

by developing centralized facility

Page 5

Your logo

12/17/2012

• Homogenization of waste water and better hydraulic stability.

• To organize scientific disposal of treated wastes and sludge

• Elimination of multiple discharges in the area

Page 6

Your logo


Significant aspects for CETP success

� Consistent quality and quantity of effluent at CETP inlet

� Absolute performance of CETP

� Adoption of discharge technology

� Rational and achievable Environmental Standards

2

Page 7

Your logo


Constraints Of CETP

Consistency in compliance to the prescribed standards is

constrained by many reasons such as…

• Varied nature and scale of the industries.

• Addition of industries in a haphazard manner without proper

planning

• Inconsistent effluent quality & quantity from the member

industries resulting in excessive inlet mass load than designed

specifications.

Page 8

Your logo


• Poor and immoral approach of the member industries.

• Operating on “one size fits to all ” basis

• Lack of access to capital investments, working capitals

• Lack of specialized technical skills and thereby improper

management of common facility.

Page 9

Your logo Industrial Estate

Identification of

waste water

generating units

Dry Inventory

Wet Inventory

Selection of

effluent collection

system

Location of CETP

Selection of most

feasible Disposal

Methods

Explore optimization by

segregation of specific

streams – say refractory COD

Assimilative

capacity of

recipient body and

treated water

quality

requirements

Choice Of Most Feasible & Viable

Treatment Scheme

Establishment Of CETP And Its O & M

Planning Process

Of

A

CETP

Page 10

Your logo

Factors Influence The Proper Planning

1) Categories of effluent generating member industries

2) Qualitative / quantitative fluctuation of effluent

3) Pre – treatment requirements

4) Segregation of effluent streams at individual member industry

5) Collection and monitoring mechanism

6) Treatability study and selection of treatment technology

7) Mode of disposal

8) Charging system

Page 11

Your logo

Improve discharge technology

Marine Deep Sea Discharge

• Globally accepted concept.

• Costly but reasonable and sustainable long term solution

• Supplementary to ETP as assimilation capacity of sea is utilized

• An effective, reliable and economical solution having minimum

environmental impact

Page 12

Your logo

e.g. Sewage: nutrients (BOD, P), total coliform,...

Fecal coliform:

• Raw sewage 106 – 108 e.coli/100ml Average: 107

• EC Bathing Water Standard 500 e.coli/100ml Factor: 20,000

TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY

primary (mechanical) treatment

enhanced primary (chemical floculation)

secondary (biological)

tertiary (chemical)

increased

nutrient

removal

(sludge!)

Coliform reduction factor

1.5 – 3

10 – 100

100 – 1000

1000 – 10,000

MIXING TECHNOLOGY

Surface discharge at shoreline

Submerged single port discharge

Submerged multiport discharge (diffuser)

Dilution factor

2 - 10

5 - 50

100 - 1000

3

Page 13

Your logoHydrodynamic mixing

Olympic Dam, Australia

Source: Source: Source: Source: BWTBWTBWTBWT

Dilution is not instantaneous!

Extension of Zone at

Ankleshwar NCTL discharge

approx. 100mwith dilutions from 250-2000

(NEERI, NIO, CSMCRI Reports)Page 14

Your logo

Emission Limiting Value (ELV)

Limiting value to be observed at ETP outlet.

Adopted by regulatory as it is easy to monitor.

Environmental Quality Standards (EQS).

Limiting value to be observed at receiving body.

It is difficult to monitor.

EQS considers impact on ambient.

ELV never sees whether discharge is at just out side the factory or in near

by creek or in river or in estuary or in seashore (coastal)or deep in to the

sea where instantaneous dispersion & tremendous dilution exist.

Stipulation based on ELV alone appears illogical, since it does not directly

consider the actual impact on the receiving water body.

Page 15

Your logo

Means Of Finance

Capital Revenue

- CETP membership fees - Collection from Member industries

based on actual quantity and quality

- Equity form promoters of effluent discharged in CETP

- Term loan - Working capital loan

- Subsidy

- Grant – in - aid

Page 16

Your logo

Suggestions To Improve CETP Performance

� Intention to set up CETP should be honest and healthy

� Regulatory should ensure CETP membership of industries prior to

granting and renewing NOCs /CCAs.

� There should exist agreement between CETP and member

industries which ensures complete compliance of effluent

acceptance criteria , revenue strategy and levy of penalty/

punishment on deviation.

Page 17

Your logo

� CETP management should be independent and should not have

any interference from the member industries

� CETP should have dedicated monitoring cell

� CETP should have strong capital as well as recurring cost

collection strategies

� Database collection [design basis] at the conceptual phase should

be highly realistic and authentic.

Page 18

Your logo

� Regulatory should be very careful while granting “ZERO

DISCHARGE” status to any chemical industries as in actual practice

it is a matter of debate that can any chemical industry be zero

discharge.

� Unauthorized discharge is one of the major reasons for excessive

pollutant load at CETP inlet. To carry the effluent up to common

collection point through “under ground & gravity network”

should be banned strictly by enforcing “over ground &

pressurized effluent carrying network”.

4

Page 19

Your logo

� Monitored quality and measured quantity of effluent discharged

by the member industries must match with what is received at

CETP inlet.

� Government should extend sufficient financial aid to CETPs.

� Prior to granting raw water and effluent quantities, regulatory

should ensure that the same quantities have been booked at

CETP. CETP operator should have knowledge about official

quantity of individual member as well as the entire estate.

Page 20

Your logo

� There must be segregation of highly polluted streams with respect

to specific pollutant like refractory COD or NH3N and either these

stream should be treated separately at member industry’s end or to

send separately to CETP for specific treatment.

� All CETP members should follow ethics and observe discipline.

Member should give proper treatment at their end as per the

NOC/CCA given to them and should not discharge more quantity

than permitted. Never adopt the way of unauthorized discharge by

any mode at any time.

Page 21

Your logoWe do not inherit the earth from our

ancestors; We borrow it from our

children

1

Page 1

Group 1: Government policies and supportive instruments for CETPs in India


1. Do we have clearly defined policies at Central / State / Local levels for promoting establishing and up-gradation / modernization of CETPs?

2. Formulation of policy- What is the role of Government (Central / State / Institutional), Industry/ Industrial associations ?

3. Existing CETP standards / regulations at central and state levels- Does it require any modification / revision / amendments?

4. What are the existing Central / State Government funding schemes and incentives for promoting CETPs and associated infrastructure?


5. What are the key priorities for the industrial associations / private bodies and public bodies (industrial development

corporations) on establishment of CETPs?

6. Are technical & managerial guidelines easily accessible for

CETPs?

7. Does Policies and supportive instruments exist for facilitating

compliances by existing CETPs ?

8. Are there any incentives and other promotional instruments for market development of service providers & enhancing

industry participation in CETPs

9. Approach / Mechanism for ensuring environmental

compliances by existing CETPs

Group 1: Government policies and supportive instruments for CETPs in India..

Page 3

Group 2: Viable business/management models & role of private sector & PPP


1. Experience with existing business models

a. Issues, challenges and opportunities

b. Suggested viable business models for CETPs in India –PPP / Govt/ private / JV

2. Experience with existing management models (administrative controls, O & M, user charges, troubleshooting, monitoring, overseeing)

a. Issues, challenges and opportunities

b. Suggested viable management models for CETPs in India


3. Private sector for planning and development of CETPs and

associated infrastructure

4. Who should initiate the process (industrial estate management /

IE owner/ IE association)?

5. What should be the key steps for establishing viable business

models and roles of each stakeholder?.

6. How to restructure / strengthen existing business / management

model for non-complying CETPs

Group 2: Viable business/management models & role of private sector & PPP..

Page 5



1. What are the key issues related to

� Planning and designing of CETPs

� Existing CETP technologies in India

2. Are there any Pre-requisite for designing of CETPs?

3. What are the available BAT / Advanced / State of the Art /

Innovative CETP technologies globally?

4. Approach / key steps for identifying innovative and viable

solutions for existing non-complying CETPs


5. Where can we access a list of environmental

accredited consultants / designers and EPC

companies?

6. CETP quality certification – trained man power,

appropriate technology,

7. Online monitoring technologies and public display of

information

8. Innovative and economic viable CETP technology

Group 3: Innovative and viable technical solutions for CETPs in India..