10mm87- mastering processing

Upload: caruso71

Post on 07-Jul-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/18/2019 10MM87- Mastering Processing

    1/2

     ! dedicated mastering

    facility remains one of

    the most prestigious

    and expensive

    elements of the

    audio-production

    chain. Packed with rare and

    esoteric equipment, these

    studios can turn the most

    lifeless of mixes into a master

    that plays well in every

    conceivable situation – in other

    words, a master you’d be happy

    to put your name to! However,despite sharing many of the

    same types of processors as

    you’d find in a conventional

    studio (namely, EQ, compression

    and limiting), the design of

    so-called ‘mastering-grade’

    processors remains markedly

    different from their studio

    counterparts. So, what are these

    differences, and how do they

    contribute to the overall result?

    Taking controlIn contrast to a traditional

    mixing desk, a masteringconsole will have relatively few

    controls, each specifically

    focused on the demands of the

    task in hand. For example, the

    Maselec MTC-2 mastering

    controller is designed to enable

    the user to switch between

    different monitoring sources

    (DAT, DAW or CD, for example),

    as well as audition different

    insert processors. Various

    compressors, EQs, limiters and

    so on will be permanently

    patched into the console,

    enabling the mastering engineer

    to quickly audition the masterwith and without any

    associated processing.

    Rather than providing any

    flattering tonal colouration, the

    ideal mastering console will

    have a minimal sonic fingerprint,

    with the majority of the master’s

    character coming from the

    selection of processors used

    across the inserts. In the

    Maselec MTC-2’s case,

    however, there are some

    exceptions to the rule, including

    filtering controls to roll off

    excessive high or low ends in amix, as well as its unique

    Elliptical Filter. The Elliptical

    Filter (a favourite tool among

    many professional mastering

    engineers) works at a point

    below the stated cutoff point

    (200Hz, for example), removing

    any out-of-phase stereo

    components and thus tightening

    the bass end of the track.

    Interestingly, the Elliptical

    Filter is one of a number of

    controls found on mastering

    equipment that relate to the

    process of cutting to vinyl, and it

    offers precise control over thevertical and lateral components

    of an audio signal. Rather than

    carrying two discrete left and

    right channel components, the

    horizontal stylus motion (lateral,

    in other words) carries the L/R

    summed signal, while the

    vertical stylus motion carries the

    L/R difference signal. Given the

    precise nature of what can and

    cannot be pressed to vinyl, it is

    important to control these two

    components. Compressors such

    as the Fairchild 670 or Manley

    Labs’ Variable Mu (with theoptional M/S upgrade) will

    therefore include Vertical/Lateral

    compression modes, enabling

    the mono and stereo

    components of the signal to be

    compressed in different ways.

    The equalizerOperationally, a mastering-

    grade equalizer such as the

    Massenburg 9500 or Prism

    Sound’s Maselec MEA-2 initially

    appear to be much like any

    other parametric EQ, with

    Frequency, Cut/Boost and Q

    controls for each band.However, one important aspect

    of mastering EQ is the provision

    of discrete controls for both the

    left- and right-hand sides of the

    mix. A mastering engineer, for

    example, might decide to cut

    2dB off the presence in a guitar

    in the left-hand channel, but this

    shouldn’t necessarily be to the

    detriment of signals in the right-

    hand channel. A 12kHz ‘air’

    boost, on the other hand, will

    probably be mirrored on both

    sides of the stereo image.

     Additionally, bypass controlswill often be available for each

    band (as well as global EQ

    bypass), enabling the relative

    amounts of cut and boost to be

    individually auditioned.

    Looking more closely at the

    curves of the EQ, you’ll also

    notice a bias to more rounded Q

    curves, accentuating a flattering

    cut and boost to the master,

    rather than notching out sharp

    frequencies. Equally, the

    shelving controls may well have

    distinctive curves to them

    (forming a large part of their

    Could the difference between conventional studio outboard and mastering-grade

    processors be purely down to their price tags? Mark Cousins finds out...

    Mastering processing

    "#$ &'$("#&!)"#* No87

    38 September 2006 MusicTech MAGAZINE

    A mastering-grade equalizer will feature dedicated, identical controls for either side of the stereo image. The exact curve of the EQ

    can also be engineered to produce the most flattering, musical response.

    MTM42.10mm mastering 8/1/06 3:28 PM Page 1

  • 8/18/2019 10MM87- Mastering Processing

    2/2

    sonic character) that differs from

    conventional shelving EQ on a

    console. A Baxandall curve, for

    example, produces a graduated

    and continuing rise at the given

    frequency point, rather than the

    sharp ‘plateau’ effect usually

    associated with shelving.

     Achieving the comparative air

    boost on a Baxandall EQ

    requires setting the Frequency

    control slightly lower to achieve

    the same level of excitement,

    contributing a different

    musicality to the EQ’ed signal.

    Band on the runContrary to what most home

    studio enthusiasts would

    expect, the majority of

    professional mastering

    engineers prefer good single-

    band compression – like that

    offered by the Maselec MLA-2

    or Manley Variable Mu – to

    multi-band compression. As

    well as being incredibly

    expensive, single-band

    mastering-grade compressors

    offer a unique musical response

    to the source material, resulting

    in a transparent and natural

    application of gain reduction.

    You won’t, however, find

    traditional Threshold, Ratio,

     Attack and Release controls on

    such devices.

    The Maselec MLA-2, for

    example, works on the input-

    drive principle. A ratio is

    selected (from 1.4:1 to 5:1),

    which in turn selects a preset

    threshold. The amount of gain

    reduction is then determined bythe level of input fed into the

    gain-reduction stage – an

    increase in gain, therefore,

    applies more

    compression. Given the

    automatic switching of

    threshold, any move towards a

    different ratio won’t be met by a

    dramatic increase or reduction

    in the compressor’s output level

    as it would on a conventional

    threshold/ratio compressor. This

    enables the mastering engineer

    to better assess the respective

    difference at different ratios

    without having to compete with

    differing amplitudes.

    The Manley Variable Mu, on

    the other hand, foregoes a Ratio

    control, although it does include

    a Threshold control. The

     Variable Mu concept (as

    discussed in Issue 28’s 10MM

    on Compression Types) works

    by having a level-dependent,

    variable ratio – put simply, the

    harder you push a Variable Mu

    compressor, the harder the ratio

    becomes. For example, keeping

    the threshold high and running a

    low input would produce just a

    few decibels of gain reduction,

    equivalent to a ratio of about

    1.5. Reducing the threshold and

    driving the input harder will

    apply more gain reduction using

    a correspondingly harder ratio

    (4:1 and above). Ultimately, the

     Variable Mu interaction is a

    slightly trickier concept to grasp

    (compared to the conventional

    threshold/ratio concept), but the

    results it can produce are well

    worth the effort.

    No limitsThe last point in the mastering

    signal path is usually reservedfor a brick-wall limiter – this is

    used to catch stray peaks and

    increase the perceived loudness

    of the finished master. Unusually,

    given the predominant use of

    Class A analogue processing in

    the rest of the signal path,

    limiting remains one of the few

    areas in which digital processing

    is the preferred approach. The

    reason for this is simple: unlike

    compression and EQ, where the

    tonal colouration and sound is

    so important, all a brick-wall

    limiter needs to do is work

    quickly, matching any movement

    over the threshold with a

    corresponding reduction in gain.

    One of the main reasons

    why digital limiters such as

    Waves’ L2 Ultramaximizer work

    so quickly and achieve such

    precise and transparent gain

    reduction is through the use of a

    look-ahead buffer. The bufferholds a few milliseconds of

    audio, analysing it first and then

    applying the gain reduction. That

    way the limiter is never taken by

    surprise and is always ready to

    act on any stray transients.

    Mastering finesse Although few of us will ever be

    in the position to afford the kind

    of kit found in professional

    mastering studios,

    understanding some for the

    principal design differences and

    unique ways of working can

    certainly improve our work at

    home. Clearly, the design of the

    equipment – from lateral/vertical

    compression to the unique

    curvaceous qualities of a

    mastering EQ – has had a

    significant impact on the sound

    of recorded music to date, and

    will continue to define working

    practices in the future.

    Promisingly, though, as a greater

    amount of hardware enters the

    virtual domain, we may

    increasingly have more access

    to these unique and interesting

    forms of audio processing. MTM

    MusicTech MAGAZINE September 2006 39

    In contrast to a traditional mixing desk, amastering console has relatively few controls.

     For further information on some ofthe areas mentioned, visit:www.musictechmag.co.uk/mtm/features/compression-typeswww.elysia.comwww.maselec.comwww.manleylabs.com

     Check out the Gearslutz site formore on high-end audio processing:

    gearslutz.com

    !"#$% ()!*

     Tech terms Air

    !"#$%#&'(#) +,-.# /0123 +"#"#4#""#5 6- +) 67# 8+("9 -4 + :(.#&)-%&5; #&)) 6- 67# )-%&5;

    Parametric EQ

    ?+"+@#6"(' AB () + 4%==C .+"(+,=#+>>"-+'7 6- #$%+=()+6(-&;