1

RFA MeetUpDecember 14, 2012

CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGESCHANCELLOR’S OFFICE

California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 2

• Phase 1: Doing What MATTERS for Jobs & Economy Framework– Target incentive investment (EWD, SB70, Perkins 1B)

• Sector

• Region

• Technical Assistance

– Braided RFA

– Common accountability metrics

Administrative Fixes Empower Regions Rethink Funding

• Phase 2: Moving the Needle

• Phase 3: Scaling Excellence

California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 3

Administrative Fixes Empower Regions Rethink Funding

Perkins 1B = Perkins 1C /

California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 4

Questions from 12.7.12

• I think the macro regions on this slide are wrong. A,B, & G the double regions and C,D,E & F are single regions. Slide shows regions A,B, & G receiving $150K - $70K These are the double regions (NFN, BAY, LA/OC, funding should be at $300K, not $150K

• Will the RFA released as a draft document for comment prior to the final official release?

• Is it accurate to say that the Sector Navigators will primarily focus on Regions that have selected the strand as a “P” or “E”?

• If the consortia does not agree/select on a specific sector for “P” and “E”, will a college not be allowed to apply for EWD Center funding in that sector?

• As documents under DWM website are modified, have you determined a way to indicate when a document has changed?

• What is the CCCCO Extended Operations Team?

• Has there been extended discussion with EDD on sharing data cohorts? This will be critical for evaluation.

• In previous years, EWD Centers were able to request an extension of their funding into the next fiscal year. Will they still be able to do that and will Centers be able to request an extension of 2012-2013 funds?

• If we have a program not selected by our region as Sector, can we benefit from the curricular work being done in a different region?

• Must Sector Navigators be housed in a region that has chosen that Sector?

• Outside of the 10 Sectors, can we apply to charter a collaborative community so that we can upgrade our curriculum or undertake a project-in-common?

• How can I better position for SB 1070 funds coming out in the 3rd round?

California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 5

Recap

• 12+ months of conversations with internal and external stakeholders

• First set of RFAs release within 30 days…– RFAs for Key Talent:

• Sector Navigators statewide consolidated package ($372,500 each): Sector Navigator, Hub, Collaborative Communities, Advisories

• Consortia Chair packages:– Macro-regions A, B, G: $300K + $70K– Macro-regions C, D, E, F: $150K + $70K

– Selected TA Provider RFAs:• Labor market information • Contract education • CACareerCafe.com toolkits • EWD coordination • Administration of ‘supplemental Collaborative Communities’

• Future RFAs: Upon resolving dependencies

CORRECTED

California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 6

Questions from 12.7.12

• Regarding the 3 Priority and 2 Emerging Sectors restriction for each region – is there data that shows each region is the same in terms of economic/population/industrial demographics. Can you share this date so we can see how “5” was determined as appropriate for each region? Seems like a one size fits all approach – seeing the data will help understand.

• The 15 Economic Regions for California – what is the source of the designation? Are they used by other agencies in the state?

• Can you tell me what external stakeholders have been involved in the process? Specifically what companies have provided input to date?

• Is there still time to make a case for ICT to be elevated form Emerging to Priority in LA/OC: Bases on number of jobs and higher revenue and wages.

• What happens when a consortia doesn’t consult other regional partners in determining sectors?

• It is amazing to me that Hospitality and Tourism was not included in the San Diego Region as it is the 3rd largest industry Sector and is identified by both the EDC and the Workforce Partnership as a priority, but not by colleges.

• Is there an example of a region working together?

• Are you going to continue to go forward with having Consortia pursue Joint Power Authority?

California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 7

12+ months of listening and discussion - Constituencies

• Statewide need of regions: ‘Skilled workers by sectors’

– Becky Morgan, California Economic Summit & California Forward

• Retraining economy: workers need multiple on- and off-ramps to skill, reskill, and up skill.

– Tim Rainey, California Workforce Investment Board, Formerly California Labor Federation

• Lack of capacity to respond creates an access problem: no training, no job.

– SEIU-UHW Innovate What Matters Allied Health Project

• Some policies that originated for the purpose of transfer do not work for the workforce mission.

– IHELP Nancy Shulock

• EWD and SB70 reauthorization pledged administrative changes.

– Legislature & Staff, Legislative Analyst Office, Department of Finance

• Trust by employers takes time, while tenure of college CEOs is shortening.

– Dianne Van Hook, Chancellor, Santa Clarita District

• Likely themes in federal funding shifts: consortia, competition, sectors, regions, pathways, outcomes, authentic partnerships.

– Andy Van Kleunen, National Skills Coalition

California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 8

12+ months of listening and discussion - ‘Extended Leadership Team’

Linda Zorn

Jim Caldwell

Linda Collins

Rich Della Valle

Lyla Eddington

Elaine Gaertner

David Gatewood

John Means

Rock Pfotenhauer

Omid Pourzanjani

Mike Roessler

Catherine Swenson

June Bayha

Cris McCullough

Greg Thomas

Debra Jones

Van Ton-Quinlivan

California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 9

12+ months of listening and discussion – Consortia Leaders, Initiative Directors, CCCCO Staff

Perkins Regional Consortia Leaders• Rock Pfotenhauer• Kitty O’Doherty• Linda Zorn• Tessa Miley• Jim Anderson• Lou Anne Walden• Sue Clark • Stan Shroeder• Michelle Turner• Joyce Johnson• Julie Pekhonan• Lyla Eddington• Susan Coleman

EWD Initiative Directors

• Jose Anaya, Advanced Manufacturing• Peter Davis, Adv Transportation & Renewables

• Elaine Gaertner, Centers of Excellence• Jeffrey O’Neil, Life Sciences/Biotech• Mike Roessler, Small Business• Catherine Swenson, Training & Development• Bruce Whistler, Work-based Resource Ctr• Jeff Williamson, Global Trade & Logistics • Steve Wright, Interactive Mobile Applications• Linda Zorn, Health

CCCCO Staff

California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 10

12+ months of listening and discussion – EDPAC, CWIB State Leadership, CCCAOE Leadership

EDPAC/WEDPAC • 10 sector reps• 1 labor• 1 philanthropy• 1 CWIB to represent state agencies• 1 economic development • 7 community college CEOs from each macro-

region• 1 classified rep• 2 faculty

• 1 ASCCC faculty rep• 1 CTE faculty

• 1 CCCAOE• 2 BoG• 1 student rep• 1 CIO/CBO• 2 CCCCO

CWIB State Leadership• CA Workforce Investment Board (CWIB)• CA Community Colleges (CCCCO)• CA Department of Education (CDE)• CA Energy Commission (CEC)• Division of Apprenticeship Standards (DAS)

CCCAOE Leadership• Sidney Burks, Chaffey College• Carol Coen, SJ Evergreen CCD• Jeff Cummings, College of the Sequoias• Corinne Doughty, Santiago Canyon College• Lyla Eddington, Rio Hondo College• Carole Goldsmith, W. Hills CCD• Richard Ida, Sacramento City College• Eva Jimenez, Shasta College• Joyce Johnson, Mr. San Jacinto College• John Means, Kern CCD• Wheeler North, SD Miramar College• Beth Pratt, Napa Valley College• Omid Pourzanjani, Golden West College• Kim Schenk, Diablo Valley College• Julius Sokenu, Moorpark College• Mollie Smith, Palomar College

• Employment Development Department (EDD)• Employment Training Panel (ETP)• Health & Human Services (HHS)• Labor & Workforce Development Agency (Labor)

California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 11

12+ months of listening and discussion – Critical Conversations in the field w/ ASCCC

“We are still buzzing from the energy around that day!” Judy Miner, President, Foothill College

“I think we all sense the timeliness, even urgency, to these conversations.” Ron Taylor, Superintendent/President, Merced College

“Engaging in the Critical Conversation about Doing What MATTERS for Jobs and the Economy was extremely valuable. It really energized me to be surrounded by such a dedicated and creative group of people who have clear, focused goals and know how to work together.”

Dennis Gervin, President, Columbia College

Date / Time Region(s) Host8/21/2012 Los Angeles Los Angeles Community College District9/6/2012 Santa Cruz & Monterey Hartnell College

9/13/2012 Los Angeles Mt. San Antonio College9/14/2012 Inland Empire Inland Empire Consortium9/18/2012 East Bay Contra Costa Community College District9/20/2012 Central Valley & Mother Lode Central Valley Consortium9/24/2012 Greater Sacramento North Far North Consortia9/25/2012 Orange County Coast CCD

10/10/2012 Orange County Santa Ana College10/18/2012 Greater Sacramento, Northern Inland, Greater Coastal North Far North Consortia11/1/2012 San Diego/Imperial Southwestern Community College District11/2/2012 Silicon Valley, SF & Peninsula Foothill College and Canada College

11/20/2012 Central Valley State Center Consortium TBD December North Bay Community Colleges/WIB Meeting College of Marin Indian Valley Campus in Novato

California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 12

12+ months of listening and discussion - Constituencies

• California Chamber of Commerce

• Asian Chamber of Commerce

• California Manufacturer’s Trade Association (CMTA)

• California Energy & Utility Consortia

• National Association of Manufacturers

• Center for Energy Workforce Development

• California Hospital Association

• U.S. Department of Agriculture

• Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce

• California Competes

• FACCC

• Campaign for College Opportunities

• California Regional Occupational Programs

• Community College League of California

• California Community College Trustees

• California Community College Board of Governors

• eUpdates, eAlerts

• Public comment via web, twitter

Doingwhatmatters.cccco.edu

California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 13

RecapConsolidation of regional submissions

Key:P = Priority sectorE = Emergent sector

HealthAdvanced

Manufacturing

Agriculture, Water, &

Environmental Tech

Life Sciences/ Biotech

ICT/ Digital Media

Retail/ Hospitality/

Tourism 'Learn and

Earn'

Advanced Transportation &

Renewables

Energy (Efficiency) &

Utilit ies Small Business Global Trade &

LogisticsNorth/ Far North

Greater Sacto P E P E PNorthern Coastal P E P E PNorthern Inland P E P E P

Bay/ Interior Bay

SF/San Mateo P E P P EEast Bay P E P E PSilicon Valley P P E P ENorth Bay E P E P PSC/Monterey E P P P E

Central

Central Valley P P P E EMother Lode E E P P P

LA/OC

LA County P E P P EOrange County P P E P E

San Diego/ Imperial P E P E P

Desert/ Inland Empire P P E E P

South Central P P E E P

California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

RecapLessons Learned

• For 2014-15: Time process for earlier– CoE to modify top 10 sector categories by May– Consortia revisits prioritization during summer– Submission in September

• Effective practice - include LWIBS/EDCs in prioritization

• Never enough resources. Aim to be equitable– Similar funding pool for similar sized macro-regions– Differentiate between Priority vs. Emergent funding– SB 1070 will go away by end of 2015, unless new funds founds

• Grants fund capacity– Long term = annual but potential for 2-5 years– Short term = annual but performed in 1-2 years– Spot = less than 12 months

California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 15

Common Metrics & Accountability

A. Student Momentum Points

B. Leading Indicators of Curriculum Alignment to Workforce Needs

C. Quality of Service Measures

SB 1402 SB 1070 Perkins 1BMore on outcomes,

less on activities and outputs

Common menu

Selectively applies depending on funding stream & RFA scope

Advised by CalPASS, RP Group, WestEd, CCCCO TRIS, ARCC 2.0, field

Launchboard: tools to automate data collection and deliver data

“Moving the Needle”

California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 16

A. Student Momentum Points

• Middle School cluster• Transition from Middle School to

High School cluster• High School cluster• Transition from High School to

College cluster• Community College cluster• General Education and Transfer

Progress cluster• Community College Transition to

Workforce cluster• Workforce Progress cluster

SB 1402 SB 1070 Perkins 1BX

X

X

X

X

XX

X

X

Work in progress

X

X

X

X X

California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 17

B. Leading Indicators of Curriculum Alignment

Occurrences of the following:• Alignment of skillsets within a program

(or set of courses) to the needs of the industry in a particular occupation and the needs of the labor market

• Regionalization of stackable certificates aligned with a particular occupation ladder

• Alignment of a certificate with state-, industry-, nationally-, and/or employer-recognized certificate

• Movement of a certificate from non-credit to credit

• Curriculum articulation along a career or multi-career educational pathway

• Updating skills of faculty, teachers, counselors, and/or ‘supporting staff to student’ to reflect labor market needs

SB 1402 SB 1070 Perkins 1B

Work in progress

XXX

For each, grantees shall provide evidence in the form of a rating by the employers/advisory body,

on a scale of 0-5. 5 = exceeds expectation4 = meets expectation

3 = almost meets expectation2 = below expectation

1 = does not meet expectation

California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 18

C. Quality of Service Measures

• 360-degree evaluation, with consideration for…– Strength of leadership and

coordination in building of necessary supporting capacity, such as center, advisories, collaborative communities, and hub

– Strength of partnership with education and industry partners

– Strength of awareness and influence on state and regional policy related issues

– Leadership and responsiveness as a member of the CCCCO Extended Operations Team

SB 1402 SB 1070 Perkins 1B

XX

Work in progress

Tool will be provided by the CCCCO.

California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 19

Future RFA MeetUps

• For instructions to MeetUp: http://doingwhatmatters.cccco.edu/Portals/6/docs/eAlert%20-%20RFA%20Meet%20Ups.pdf

– Friday, 01/11/12, 12:00pm - 1:00pm– Friday, 01/18/12, 12:00pm - 1:00pm– Friday, 01/25/12, 12:00pm - 1:00pm

• Follow us on Twitter:– OmidOnEducation– WorkforceVan