1 public nutrition: assessment and advanced analysis inhl 709 spring 2010 tues thurs: 9.00—10.30 +...

46
1 Public Nutrition: Assessment and Advanced Analysis INHL 709 Spring 2010 Tues Thurs: 9.00—10.30 + troubleshooting 1.30-3.00 Fridays in 2200-23

Upload: mildred-davidson

Post on 12-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • *Public Nutrition:Assessment and Advanced Analysis

    INHL 709Spring 2010Tues Thurs: 9.0010.30+ troubleshooting 1.30-3.00 Fridays in 2200-23

  • *

    M/CDates 2010TopicRefAssignment1 1 2Tues 12 JanThur 14 JanIntroductionPANDA Ch 1 Go through PANDA Ch 12 3 4Tues 19 anThur 21 JanData cleaning (intro)Data cleaning (progress)PANDA Ch 2Clean bdeshd1.savDue Tue 26 Jan3 5 6Tues 26 JanThur 28 Jan One way analyses: district aggregated data (intro)Review cleaning results.One way (progress)PANDA Ch 3, pp 1-2Situation analysis and ranking for Bdesh district data (bdeshc.sav). Due Tues 2 Feb4 7 8 9 10 Tue 2 FebThur 4 FebTues 9 FebThur 11 FebReview one-way results. Associations in aggregated data (Bdesh).Associations (progress, Bdesh). Intro Indonesia assignment.Indonesia assignment (progress)Review Indonesia resultsChild level, intro.PANDA Ch 3, p3Examine associations in Bdesh dataset. Due Fri 5 Feb.Set up and analyse Indonesia provincial dataset. Due Wed 10 Feb5 11 12Thur 18 FebTues 23 FebChild-level dataTest.PANDA Ch 3Use Kenya data for ranking and associations, due Thurs 25 Feb6 13 14 15Thu 25 FebTue 3 MarThu 4MarTwo-way analyses by tabulation and regression; causal factors.PANDA Ch 4Use Kenya data for 2-way analyses, due Fri 5 Mar7 16 17 Tue 9 MarThu 11 MarMulti-way analysis, confounding and interactions.Targetting and coverage evaluation.PANDA Ch 5PANDA Ch 3 p2; Chs 4&5.Use Kenya data for associations controlling for confounders, assemble all results, due Fri 12 Mar

  • *Note: Trouble shooting on Friday afternoons, 1.30-3.00.

    PANDA (Practical Analysis of Nutritional Data) is main material for course, available on web Tulane.edu/~panda3; also can be got on CD if needed..

    18-26Tue 16 Mar - Thurs 27 AprilAnalyse different Kenya dataset for:(a) situation analysis, (b) targetting priorities, (c) program design (d) program coverage and targetting.All PANDA, incl. Ch 7Analysis of provincial Kenya datasets. Assignments and class discussion:Due dates to be discussed

  • *Readings.

    Beaton, G., Kelly, A., Kevany, J., Martorell, R. & Mason, J. (1990) Appropriate Uses of Anthropometric Indices in Children. ACC/SCN StateoftheArt Series, Nutrition Policy Discussion Paper No.7. ACC/SCN, Geneva. http://www.unscn.org/archives/npp07/index.htm

    UNICEF Survey (MICS) Manual. http://www.childinfo.org/files/Multiple_Indicator_Cluster_Survey_Manual_2005.pdf

    SMART nutrition survey methodology manualhttp://www.smartindicators.org/SMART_Methodology_08-07-2006.pdf

    Public Health Surveillance: A Tool for Targeting and Monitoring Interventions. Nsubuga et al. 2006. DCP2 Ch 53 p997http://files.dcp2.org/pdf/DCP/DCP53.pdf

    Developing Nutrition Information Systems In Eastern And Southern Africa.Report of Regional Technical Working Group Meetings Nairobi, 1-3 February and 19-21 April 2007. By: UNICEF Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Office (ESARO) andTulane University, Department of International Health and Development(p:\niaer\FNB publn\Wshops report.doc)

    Nutritional surveillance in relation to the food price and economic crises. J Mason. Workshop Summary, Institute of Medicine, July 2009, pp 67-72.http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12698&page=67

  • *Introduction (lectures 1 & 2)

    Assessment and AnalysisPlanning framework: questions to addressResearch questions and dummy tablesLanguage, variables, indicatorsData sourcesData transformations, units of analysis.

  • *

  • "PUBLIC NUTRITION

    includes the following activities:

    an understanding and a raising of awareness of the nature,

    causes and consequences of nutrition problems in society;

    epidemiology, including monitoring, surveillance, and evaluation;

    nutritional requirements and dietary guidelines for populations;

    programs and interventions: their design, planning, management, and evaluation;

    community nutrition and community based programs;

    public education, especially nutrition education for behavioral

    change;

    timely warning and prevention and mitigation of emergencies, including use of emergency food aid;

    advocacy and linkage with, for example, population and environmental concerns;

    public policies relevant to nutrition in several sectors, for example, economic development, health, agriculture, and education.

    Source: letter to Am J Clin Nutr, March 1996,63399-400, Mason, Habicht, Greaves, Jonsson, Kevany, Martorell, and Rogers.

  • *

  • *

  • *

  • *

    Surveillance: to watch over ... to make decisions that will lead to improvements in populations ...

    Surveillance cycle

    Decide on action

    Monitor

    Evaluate

    Detect new

    problems

    Take action

    (Implement)

    Data

    Observation

  • *

    Source

    Long-term planning

    Program monitoring and evaluation

    Timely warning to prevent crises

    A. Repeated national surveys

    Yes, main use

    Possible but rare as process data limited and design not ideal

    No, too infrequent and too long lag

    B. Area level surveys

    Not usually, but some potential with further analysis

    Possible but rare as process data limited, design not ideal, and external validity may be unclear.

    Main use, together with other data (e.g. prices)

    C. Reporting systems

    Not usually, as less reliable than A.

    Potential use for process monitoring if lag can be reduced.

    Potential main use if lag can be minimized.

    D. Sentinel systems

    Potential: e.g. Zimbabwe

    Potential for evaluation if carefully designed.

    Potentially important use

  • *2. Planning framework:questions to address(and dummy tables)

  • *Coverage: how many people?Targeting: who?Intensity: resources/headContent: what activities (components)?You need to decide:For programme planning

  • *

  • *Research questions

    Specify keep going till you answer them refer back to them when you get lost

  • *Research questions

    Dummy tablesDefine variablesDesign questionnaire

  • *

    Research questions on malnutrition (examples):How serious/extensive is it? (Compare to norms)Is it worse in some places/for some populations? (Compare between groups at one time)Is it getting better or worse, for whom? (Compare between times, for groups: norm 0.5 1 ppt/yr)What is cause of current situation, or changes? (Analyze associations; includes evaluation)

    You could also ask: what problems are we trying to solve, and what resources do we have this would come in at question 1, but then continue to ask how the resources address the problems ...

  • *How serious/extensive is malnutrition?

    E.g. prevalences of underweight, wasting, GAM etc.

    Note: interpretation may need to differ by population group, e.g. pastoralists vs agriculturalists; mortality risk varies in relation to GAM. 10% cut-point for agriculturalists may be equivalent to 20% for pastoralistsE.g. of cut-points: 10% warning, 20% emergencyE.G of dummy table

    Wasting %(Cis)Stunting %(Cis)Oedema %District A

  • *Is malnutrition worse in some places/for some populations?

    Example of dummy table: compare districts A and BDont forget precise title!Prevalences of wasting and stunting in children < 110 cms in Northern province, January 2007

    GroupWasting %Stunting %% IDPsDistrict ADistrict BTotal

  • *

    3.Is malnutrition getting better or worse, for whom?Example of dummy tablePrevalences of wasting in children 6-59 months in January and July 2007 in Northern province

    GroupWasting: Jan 2007Wasting:July 2007District ADistrict BTotal

  • *orPrevalences of underweight children (6-59 mo) in 2001 (May-July) and 2005 (June-Nov)Sources: DHS, 2001; MICS, 2005

    GroupUnder-weight 2001Under-Weight2005U5MR 2001U5MR 2005Province AUrbanRuralProvince BUrbanRuralTotalU+R

  • *4A.What are possible causes of the current levels of malnutrition?Prevalence of underweight in children (6-59 mo) by food security and district, controlling for education level

    Food securityEducation highEducation lowTotalDistrict AInsecureOKDistrict BInsecureOK

  • *4B.What are possible causes of changes in malnutrition? Changes in prevalences of malnutrition Jan July 2007 in children (6-59 months) with receipt of food aid, for food insecure and secure households.

    District A1/07 food insecure7/07 food insecure1/07 food secure7/07 food secureWith food aidNo food aidTotal

  • *

    Questions to answer 1

    For overall program planning

    Where and who are the malnourished?

    By area

    By biological status

    By SES, environment

    What types of malnutrition?

    Is it getting better or worse?

    Trends by year

    Seasonality

  • *

    Questions to answer 2

    For community-based programs and service delivery

    What services and programs do people with higher prevalences of malnutrition have access to?

    Coverage (# with service )

    Targeting (prevalence in covered group vs. population)

    Intensity ($/hd, fac/mob/hd, )

    Program content: relevance of activities to problems to be solved

    What causes of malnutrition are important and can be addressed through community-based programs and services?

  • *

  • *3. Language, variables, indicators

  • *

  • *

    Some key variables

    for HPN program

    planning

    Outcomes

    Intermediate

    outcomes

    Difficult to measure

    Commonly measured

    Mortality

    Nutritional status

    Anthropometry

    Morbidity

    Fertility

    Immunization

    Ante-natal care

    Health services

    Caring practices

    Diet

    Contraceptive prevalence rate

  • *

    LANGUAGE

    Analysis gives many shortcuts for communication, with conventions, drawings, and symbols. Use, get familiar with these, but query as we go along if they are unclear.

    Some conventions.

    Outcome (variable) = dependent, goes on y-axis, in cells of tables, LHS of equations.

    Classifying, determining (variable) = independent, goes on x-axis, defines columns (or rows in 2-way) tables, goes on RHS of equations.

    Scatterplot frequently (x-y plots of individual datapoints), draw lines from regressions. Correlations are very dependent on N, so treat with caution, but they give useful shorthand.

    Regression gives more language like residuals, interactions, and controlling: easier with examples later.

  • *

    VARIABLES

    Outcome

    Classifying

    Determining

    Process

    All are interchangeable, but important to decide which is which.

    Outcome variables are usually the dependent variables; content of cells in tables, LHS of equations. [NB don't usually put #s - frequencies - in cells]

    Classifying variables are often area (district) or things like occupation that have no clear order. [Dummies in equations; independent variables]

    Determining variables are usually expected to be associated with the dependent variable (eg education, water supply). They define columns, or are on the RHS of equations, as independent variables. They may be there as possibly causing the outcome; as getting in the way when a cause is investigated (confounding); or modifying the effect of another cause (interacting).

    Process variables measure things like program delivery, coverage, access to services, etc.; can be dependent sometimes, depending on the question.

  • *

    OUTCOME VARIABLEStc "OUTCOME VARIABLES"

    ADVANCE \d 18Anthropometry - birth weight, underweight, stunting, wasting.

    ADVANCE \d 19Micronutrient deficiencies.

    Iodine - eg total goitre rate in school children

    ADVANCE \d 0Vit A - clinical signs (nightblindness, Bitot's spots, ) - serum retinol,

  • *

  • Inadequate

    dietary intake

    Disease

    Malnutrition

    and death

    Inadequate

    access to food

    Inadequate care

    for mothers and

    children

    Insufficient health

    services and

    un-

    healthy

    environ-

    ment

    I na d e q u a t e e d u c a t i o n

    Potential

    resources

    Political and ideological superstructure

    Economic structure

    Formal and non-

    formal institutions

    Outcomes

    Immediate

    causes

    Underlying

    causes

    Basic

    causes

    Source:

    Redrawn from UNICEF, 1990 [39]

    Figure 1.8.

    Conceptual framework for the causes of malnutrition

    in society

  • *

    CAUSAL FACTORS -- MEASURES

    Outcomes and immediate causes -- birth weight, underweight, stunting, wasting

    inadequate dietary intake -- seldom measured

    disease -- also difficult, but some measures done

    Underlying causes

    food -- household food security

    health -- access to h services, health environment

    care -- breastfeeding, compl. foods

    Education years of schooling; literacy

    Basic causes -- access to and control of resources in principle:

    human resources

    economic resources

    organizational resources

    People: Productive assets -- landholdings, animals...

    Education level

    Access to information Etc

    Programs: village committees

    mobilizers/facilitators.. .

  • *

  • *

  • *

  • *

    Table 1

    Indicators of micronutrient deficiencies as established by WHO.

    Indicator

    Deficiency

    Vitamin A

    Iodine

    Iron

    Clinical

    Xerophthalmia night blindness (XN) (24-71 months). Bitots spots (X1B) also. Sum XN + X1B used here.

    Goitre

    Grade 1 = palpable but not visible.

    Grade 2 = visible when the neck is in a normal position.

    Sum of grades 1 + 2 used here.

    Anaemia

    Hemoglobin in g/dl:

    15 years)

    15 years) < 13 g/dl, children 6 mo-5yrs

  • *

    DATA

    Sources

    Handling units of analysis, file structure

    Cleaning errors: sources, detection, coping

    Transformations

    Language

    VARIABLES

    Anthropometric

    Micronutrients

  • *4. Data sources

  • *

  • *

  • *

  • *5. Data transformations, units of analysis

  • *

  • *Units of analysis (file structure) Preserve information Decide early Usually most disaggregated, repeating if needed (e.g. individual, household) Beware confounding, ecological fallacies if aggregated (e.g. district) data Care with hierarchical data, clusters, design effects.

    ***************************