1PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

Particles and Fields PackageMonthly Status Review (MSR)

November 15, 2011

Dave Curtis, PFP PM

2PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

Schedule Status

• STATIC, SWIA on critical path– 9.6 weeks margin to delivery to LM– Critical Path runs through electronics fab & test– Boards are starting to come out of PWB fab, getting ready to start

loading at JPL (who is quoting better delivery times than other subcontractors)

• Holding PFP package integration date for now– April 2012– SWIA/STATIC calibration will not be complete at that time, get

completed after package I&T (which hurts delivery margin)– Note that STATIC takes the longest to qualify. If STATIC schedule

deteriorates we could consider delivering that separately; the rest of the package has 12 weeks of margin

• Changed FSW Build 3 delivery from just before to just after PFP Environments– Gives more time to include any changes/fixes required based on

package level testing

3PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

Accomplishments

• EM progress:– All EM testing complete except:

• STATIC calibrations• REG #2 testing

• FM Electronic Progress:– 17 PFP flight PWB fabricated, 7 loaded and in test

• MAG MAD & ACHE boards, SWEA IRAP boards in test– 9 boards in PWB fabrication– 3 boards through review and in final adjustments before fab– 3 boards still in final layout

• REG, STATIC LVPS, STATIC ACC/MCP

• FM Mechanical– LPW, SEP, MAG, SWEA, SWIA, STATIC mechanical parts all out to fab

• Most parts received and in assembly– PFDPU getting out to fab now

• Flight harness fabrication started, fit-checked on Spacecraft mock-up

• More in instrument sections…

4PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

PFP Harness Fit Check

• PFP Flight harnesses fit-checked on the LM harness mock-up 2011-11-08

5PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

Ongoing Work

• Supporting Project planning process• Supporting EMC, Payload, SIT working groups

• Get last of FM PWBs out to fab• Get FM PWBs loaded• Get board level thermal and PSA complete

6PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

PFP RFA Status

SUBSYSTEM Actions Submitted %Submit Closed % Closed

PFP/SSL peer 20 20 100% 18 90%

MAG/GSFC peer 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a

LPW/LASP peer 13 13 100% 13 100%

SWEA peer 2 2 100% 2 100%

SSL CDR 10 9 90% 8 80%

Totals 45 44 98% 41 91%

7PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

Trades, Issues

• Working on an analysis to decide if the PFDPU mechanical design needs to be augmented to support the PWBs to avoid excessive displacements in vibe– Reached agreement on solution (DFB stiffener characteristics)– Adds mass to PFDPU to enhance stiffness of chassis.– CLOSED

• PFDPU Thermal conduction to deck– Current design does not meet ICD– Modifying deck mounting to increase conductivity– Open issue with Deck Temp at start of cruise

• 40C, at top of AFT for PFDPU

8PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

Thermal Status

• Working on board level thermal analyses– Board analysis model in place and providing results and

feedback into layouts– Some thermal data and final layouts from a few board leads still

outstanding– Submit current status, minus a few boards?

• Working on updated instrument thermal models for submission in December

• Held a review of PFP Instrument-level Thermal Balance plans with Project participation– MAG, SEP, SWEA, and STATIC will get instrument-level thermal

balance tests– PFDPU, LPW booms, EUV, and SWIA will not

9PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

Top Risks

LPW Sensor Coating concern new

Parts qual almost complete; retire next month?

MAVEN PFP RISK MANAGEMENT Chg RANK ID Approach TITLE

55 10 15 20 25

1 P-25 Mitigate LPW Sensor Coating

44 8 12 16 20

2 P-17 Mitigate Parts Qualification

33 8 9 12 15

3 P-22 Mitigate STATIC Delivery

22 4 6 8 10

4 P-21 Mitigate PFP to Spacecraft ICD

11 2 3 4 5

5 P-24 Mitigate PWB Coupon Rejection

1 2 3 4 5

Criticality Approach

High

Medium

Low

LIKELIHOOD

Improved

Worsening

Unchanged

New this month

Mitigate

Watch

Accept

Research

CONSEQUENCES

L * C Trend

*

P17P21

P25

P22P24

*

10PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

Risks ListID Title Type P I Crit Risk Statement Impact Term Plan Approach Comments

P-07Delayed LPW

Boom Deployment

Mission Performance

1 3 L

Waiting till after MOI to deploy LPW booms results in them sitting undeployed for over a year, increasing the risk of deployment failure

Potential severe degradation of LPW measurement

Far Term

Deploy after MOI [not possible to deploy earlier]

Watch We see no technical reason for concern, and previous delayed deployments have worked fine (though there has not been a long duartion test in vacuum)

P-17Parts

QualificationProject

Execution2 4 M

If parts fail qualification then system would have to be redesigned for alternate (which may also have to be qualified and may have lower performance)

Schedule, Cost, Performance

Near Term

Start parts qualification in prgress

Mitigate So far all parts look good. Not quite done. Most parts done, but impact of failure increasing

P-18Magnetics

ImplementationMission

Performance1 4 L

If unanticipated magnetics issues are found on observatory late (or not found at all) then MAG instrument performance could be degraded

Magnetics [MRD84]

Mid Term

Magnetics Working Group to monitor implementation (materials lists, etc)

Watch

P-19Electrostatics

ImplementationMission

Performance1 4 L

If unanticipated electrostatic issues are found on observatory late (or not found at all) then LPW, SWEA, SWIAm, instrument performance could eb degraded

Electrostatics [MRD 83]

Mid Term

Magnetics Working Group to monitor implementation (materials lists, etc)

Watch

P-21PFP to

Spacecraft ICDProject

Execution2 2 L

If the instrument FSW interpretation of the ICD does not match the Spacecraft interpretation then the instrument will not work at integration, requiring a PROM change to fix (and PFDPU requal)

Schedule Far Term

Work with LM on clarifying the ICD.

Mitigate Early Payload Test reduces risk on hardware side.Early HFS test helps reduce impact (find out before qual)Potential late change to zone alert system adds back risk

P-22 STATIC DeliveryProject

Execution2 3 L

If STATIC schedule margin continues to erode STATIC will not deliver to PFP package I&T on time

Schedule Mid Term

Delay some or all of STATIC calibrations till after package I&T if need be to hold package I&T date

Mitigate Procede with critical path fabrication tasks at risk prior to completion of EM;

P-24PWB Coupon

RejectionProject

Execution2 2 L

If PWB coupons are rejected, the PFP fabrication schedule will be delayed

Schedule Near Term

Use vendors with good track records. Proceed to PWB fabrication ASAP

Mitigate Start second round of PWBs as backup

P-25LPW Sensor

CoatingMission

Performance3 3 M

If LPW sensor coating is damaged during vibration test then LPW measurement is compromised

LPW measurments, especially electron temperature [MRD45]

Near Term

Test to see if a more representative launch environment (accoustics) damages sensor coating

Mitigate Cracking has been observed after random vibration. Imact on measurment is uncertain, but potentially significant

11PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

PFP Mass

• No change this month

InstrumentCBE

Total [kg] Cont. (%)Total [kg]

NTE% EM

Weighed% FM

WeighedParticles and Fields 25.34 8.0% 27.37 79% 4%LPW Total 6.01 18.4% 7.12 100% 0%

LPW Booms 4.982 19.0% 5.930 100% 0%EUV Assembly 1.030 15.5% 1.190 100% 0%

STATIC Total 3.12 6.2% 3.31 95% 0%SWEA Total 1.74 20.9% 2.10 76% 58%SWIA Total 2.67 11.4% 2.98 94% 0%SEP Total 1.32 11.7% 1.47 95% 0%MAG Total 0.96 1.0% 0.97 83% 0%PFDPU Total 7.24 -6.4% 6.78 72% 0%PF Intra-Instrument Harness Total 2.29 15.5% 2.64 0% 0%

12PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

Mass Tracking Chart

PFP Mass Trend

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

10/1/2009 12/31/2009

4/1/2010 7/1/2010 9/30/2010 12/30/2010

3/31/2011 6/30/2011 9/29/2011

Date

kg

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

Mass CBE, kg

Mass NTE, kg

Mass Margin %

13PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

PFP Power

• Measured IIB EM power converter efficiency improved efficiency slightly

• New Peak and Standby allocations per ECR203E– Reallocated power NTE between boxes– Positive margins throughout

Instrument CBE [W] Cont. (%) NTE [W] CBE [W] Cont. (%) NTE[W] CBE [W] Cont. (%) NTE[W]Particles and Fields

Off (heater only) 0.00 0.00 19.66 3% 20.31 19.66 3% 20.31Standby 10.72 9% 11.72 19.16 5% 20.18 29.88 7% 31.90Nominal 22.35 7% 23.95 16.90 5% 17.67 39.25 6% 41.62

Peak 35.76 10% 39.48 119.01 5% 125.02 154.77 6% 164.50Orbit Average 22.45 7% 24.07 16.90 4% 17.66 39.35 6% 41.73

Orbit Average:LPW 5.06 7% 5.41 0.00 0% 0.00 5.06 7% 5.41EUV 0.16 2% 0.16 2.30 4% 2.40 2.46 4% 2.56STATIC 6.03 5% 6.32 0.45 4% 0.47 6.48 5% 6.79SWEA 1.08 4% 1.12 6.13 5% 6.41 7.21 4% 7.53SWIA 2.17 4% 2.27 6.37 5% 6.66 8.54 5% 8.93SEP 3.18 4% 3.29 3.39 4% 3.54 6.57 4% 6.83MAG 3.34 4% 3.49 2.00 4% 2.09 5.34 4% 5.58PFDPU 1.44 40% 2.01 0.00 0% 0.00 1.44 40% 2.01

Operational Heater Total

14PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

PFP Power TrendPFP Power Trend

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

10/1/2009 12/31/2009

4/1/2010 7/1/2010 9/30/2010 12/30/2010

3/31/2011 6/30/2011 9/29/2011

Date

W

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

Power CBE, W

Power NTE, W

Power Margin %

15PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

PFP Data Rate

• Latest allocations per TRAS– Including pending CCR364

Rate [bps] NTE [bps]Particles and FieldsLPW/EUV 717.0 790STATIC 2000.0 2200SWEA 600.0 660SWIA 604.0 664SEP 160.0 176MAG 687.0 755PFDPU 37.0 40

Total 4805.0 5285.0

Low RateInstrument

16PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

Life Testing

• SEP Attenuator life test complete• SWEA door mechanism identical to STEREO• LPW relay life test complete• LPW deployment life test completed• SWIA, STATIC attenuator life test completed• SWIA, STATIC door mechanism functional, life test

completed

17PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

Requirements Verification Status

• Boot software Acceptance Test completed– Flows up to a few ICD and FRD requirements verified

• All life tests completed

Type # Requirements # Verified

FRD 107 2

ERD 105 0

ICD 143 1

FSW – Op 191 32.5

FSW - Boot 68 68

18PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

MAVEN PFP MAG Status

November 2011

Jack Connerney, MAG Lead

19PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

GSFC/MAG - Accomplishments Last Month

• MAG flight sensors (FM1 & FM2) thermal stress relief completed.• FM1 (Flight #1) MAD (Magnetometer Analog & Digital) circuit board

initial tuning is completed (minus FPGA).• FM2 (Flight #2) MAD circuit board initial tuning is completed; initial

scale factors determined at 22’ GSFC facility (rev02 FPGA installed).• FM1 ACHE (AC Heater Electronics) circuit board completed, on bench

in test; FM2 ACHE circuit board assembly nearing completion.• FPGA (rev 3) code in simulation and test.• First set TAYCO flight a/c heater elements scheduled for delivery in

Lab on or before 12/12/2011.• GSFC provided to LM complete drawings for sensor attachment

bracket & solid model of sensor.• Sensor bracket, sensor EMI cover (shielded), thermal blanket mold in

fabrication. • Supported ATLO TIM at LM Denver 10/25-26.• GSE (UCB emulator) development continues; display options,

instrument housekeeping telemetry conversion to EUs, etc.

20PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

MAVEN MAG FM1 ELECTRONICS (ACHE)

21PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

MAVEN MAG FM1 HARDWARE

MAVEN MAG FM1 SENSOR

FM1 ELECTRONICS (MAD) BOARD

22PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

GSFC/MAG Near Term Plans & Open Issues

• GSFC to complete a review of revised MICD when available (LM).– Attachment bracket– Position pigtail connector– Position ground wire and cable attachment(s)

• Re-run thermal model (w/3-layer thermal blanket on 0.66 m extension aka “boomlet”) prior to ACHE board completion.

• Complete fabrication of sensor mechanical pieces (thermal stand-offs, base plate, etc) and mechanical GSE for MAG test facility.

• Complete physical model(s) of sensor assembly and attachment bracket for thermal blanket shops at GSFC (sensor) and LM (boomlet).

• Design and fabrication of sensor thermal blanket.• Need commitment from Project and LM on hours of operation PFP

instrument package will receive after delivery to LM; similarly, need commitment from UCB on hours of operation MAG will receive after delivery to UCB.

23PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

MAVEN PFP SWEA Status

October 2011

Dave Mitchell, SWEA Lead

24PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

SWEA Status - IRAP

– FM calibration in progress

– Azim/Elev response for upward deflections measured.

– Azim/Elev response for downward deflections in progress.

– Energy and UV responses scheduled for Nov. 17-18.

Elevation = 0

25PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

SWEA Status - SSL

– FM Digital fab complete, coupons sent out for testing.

– Part loading instructions & board level procedures complete

– Flight design FPGA tested on EM (don’t expect any more changes prior to burning the flight part).

– FM LVPC magnetic wind & test (in progress)

– Board level procedures complete

– EM LVPC integrated and tested in vacuum

SWEA ETU

Digital board installed into pedestal

SSL pedestal (LVPS & Digital)

IRAP analyzer

IRAP front-end electronics

26PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

SWEA Issues

• Further investigation of charging anomaly

• Both SSL and IRAP EM’s exhibit the charging anomaly.

• For the SSL EM, Nuflon removed from the top cap and then the entire part was plated with gold. Tests were repeated, and the same charging anomaly was observed.

• For the SSL EM, top cap, deflectors, and outer hemisphere removed.

• Testing at IRAP shows that MAVEN FM does not exhibit this behavior.

• Testing planned for STEREO flight units.

• Vacuum tests repeated.

• Lower portion of SSL EM does not exhibit the charging behavior.

• Anomaly is associated with upper part of the sensor.

27PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

MAVEN PFP SWIA Status

November 2011

Jasper Halekas, SWIA Lead

28PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

SWIA Progress

• Electrical Progress– EM noise issues solved– FM layouts in progress

• All FM layouts out to fabrication• Digital and Anode PWB fabrication complete• Coupons in analysis at GSFC• FM kitting in progress for all boards, mostly complete

• Mechanical Progress– All FM drawings complete– All FM parts in fabrication

• Calibration/Testing– EM Testing complete– New cal chamber and manipulator ready for FM testing

• Some testing with SWEA currently shaking out a few remaining issues with manipulator, but by and large, calibration setup looking good

• New ion gun in assembly, expected complete before end of the year• Plan to use EM to check out ion gun and test out manipulator scripting

for FM calibration

29PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

SWIA Issues

• EM electronics noise issue solved– Tracked down to poor ground connection between chassis and

preamp analog ground– Solved by using a shim to make good ground connection between

standoff and ground pad on EM, solved by design on FM

• Coupon testing and board loading next– Hoping these won’t be chokepoints– May be able to utilize JPL excess capacity for some of the board

loading tasks

30PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

MAVEN PFP STATIC Status

November 2011

Jim McFadden, STATIC Lead

31PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

STATIC Accomplishments

• FM carbon foil mounting begun• Sensor and EM electronics, minus LVPS, tested in vacuum• Anode, Preamp, TDC, HV Sweep, and Digital FM PCB

fabrication packages being prepared. • LVPS modified to reduce power dissipation• FM mechanical drawings completed, reviewed and

approved.• Mechanical parts being ordered for FM fabrication• Ion feedback in Z-stack MCPs observed. HV testing

procedures modified to avoid this issue.

32PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

STATIC Plans

• TDC EM2 PCB fabricated, loaded, in test• Modified LVPS needs vacuum testing with EM electronics &

sensor• Acc/MCP HVPS Board needs layout modifications for FM

PCB• High level data products generated by FPGA still need

validation• TDC ADC latch-up protection needs testing in next version

of FPGA• Ion Gun integration with new cal chamber in process.• Mechanical parts fabricated to allow testing of TOF with

increased distance between TOF and MCPs to reduce field emission - in test.

• Vacuum sensor testing continuing

33PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

STATIC Open Issues

• EM Sweep HVPS developed problems during vacuum testing, Vgrid OpAmp failed, circuit modified to prevent current surge at +28V turnon to prevent future failure.

• EM LVPS ~200 kHz noise needs testing with SWP HVPS

• Encoder failure on new manipulator –– being evaluated and fixed

34PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

MAVEN PFP SEP Status

October, 2011

Davin Larson, SEP Lead

David Glaser, SEP ME

Miles Robinson, SEP EE

35PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

SEP Status

• DFE (sensor preamps) PWB fabricated, waiting on coupon results– Will load these boards at SSL

• DAP (analog electronics in PFDPU) PWB in fab• Sensor Mechanical parts in house• Working on painting of parts

– Tricky GSFC conductive white paint, practice on EM

36PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

MAVEN PFP DCB, Power Converter & GSE Status

November 2011

Dorothy Gordon

Timothy Quinn

Peter Berg

Chris Tiu

37PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

DCB Status

• DCB and FLIGHT FPGA Daughter Boards Flight PCB Layout

Flight DCB is in fabrication – due in 11/16/11 Flight FPGA daughter board fabrication

Delayed in order to meet the board thickness (0.063”) requirement (new material ordered by the Fabrication Facility)

o DCB FPGA Rev 11 has been released, and is installed on both DCB-ETUs

DCB Diagnostics Most recent functions added to DCB Diagnostic Test Suite

(Memory Pattern and Address Tests) complete the functionality for the Flight Test Procedure

This release will programmed into the “Diagnostic Section” of the DCB Boot ROM

38PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

Power Converter Status

• REG board • REG1 board used for the ETU-PFDPU test

• will eventually be replaced by REG2• Revised Instrument Current Monitor subsystem

• installed on REG2, checkout/verification in process• Continuing optimization of the power converter efficiency

• IIB Board• Revised converter design (increased fault tolerance) tested in

the ETU PFPDU during the MAG reintegration• FM layout review completed• Thermal Review passed • Flight board is in fabrication

39PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

PFDPU & GSE Status

• Reintegrated MAG and LPW with the ETU PFDPU• MAG FPGA upgrade• LPW retest with most recent FPGA

• MISG Hardware/Firmware• Six new MISG Boards have been tested

• One to be included in the PFP-HFS• Two in use for Instrument Mode Development/Support

• GSEOS• Manipulator control subsystem in test/development • Continuing support for Flight Instrument GSE functions• Supported instrument “reintegration” (MAG and LPW)

• High Fidelity Simulator (PFP-HFS)• Most parts are in, chassis and cabling in process

40PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

MAVEN PFP Flight Software Status

November 1 2011

Peter Harvey

41PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

Boot Status

Interface Documents, Meetings None

IV&V None

FSW Development Modified APID 23 to have 24 instead of 32 mux values Rolled the version to 1.03.

Test Status (FPGA revision 11) Long Duration Stress Test, MAVEN_PF_FSW_025_LDS_110917.doc Boot Inspection Report, MAVEN_PF_FSW_024_Inspection.doc Repeated Comprehensive Performance Test, MAVEN_PF_FSW_023_CPT_111024.doc Wrote Version Descriptor, MAVEN_PF_FSW_027_VDD_V103.doc Saved all Relevant Files on the FTP site

ftp://apollo.ssl.berkeley.edu/pub/prh/MAVEN/fsw/4.1%20Boot/

• Dates coming up 11/15 – Boot FSW ATR TBD – Boot Test with Actuators TBD - PROM Burn

42PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

Operational Status

Interface Documents, Meetings Reviewed SEP specification. Will need to revise requirements

New Requirements Monitor Actuator status (2-bit version) being added to Level 5 Modifying actuator duration requirements Modifying SEP requirements Placing requirements on RTS sequences

IV&V Reviewed schedule of development for code review next year

FSW Development DCB HSK from 32 to 24 qty -> Mod to Ap23, CTM, Code Developed Solid State Recording Module (SSR) to verify DCB Flash Hardware Developed AP21 & table 9 to be able to watch SSR read/write positions Updated IO HSK to return Flash settings

Test Status/Tools Updated instrument simulator for LPW simulation

• Issues– FLASH memory & computer speed are not the same as in RBSP!– Currently, NULACCERR flag is reported by FPGA possibly indicating race condition

between FSW and FLASH. To be diagnosed next.

43PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

Test Environment

GSEOS Status:

Instrument simulation (still in work) Limit checking error messages (uses raw values, not converted)

GSEOS Python Test Scripts, Displays Need to Build Operational Test Scripts

FSW Development Platform: Configured for Boot Testing Instrument CDI Recording Added Need to Configure with Attenuator simulation for Operational Testing Need to Configure with Instrument simulation for Operational Testing

Testing Personnel: No changes

44PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

SPRs and SCRs

SPR# Start Date Title Unit Version Status1 8/18/2011 MAG-SEP Message Collision PFDPU ETU 2.00 42 9/1/2011 UDP Checksum Errors Reported GSEOS 6.0.782 43

SCR# Start Date Title Status Version

Status: Description0 Authorized1 FSW Mods in progress2 Doc Mods in progress3 Tests in progress4 Tests & Documentation Complete

45PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

Metrics Chart

Milestone CDRDescription Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11Product Characteristics

Project Name MAVEN MAVEN MAVEN MAVEN MAVEN MAVEN MAVEN MAVEN MAVEN MAVENLanguage C C C C C C C C C C

Software Domain (FSW) FSW FSW FSW FSW FSW FSW FSW FSW FSW FSWBOOT SLOC Expected 9180 9180 9180 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000

BOOT SLOC To Date 3636 3799 3939 3939 3939 3904 3920 3797 3786 3777OPER SLOC Expected 9180 9180 9180 15000 15000 15000 15000 15000 15000

OPER SLOC To Date 5290 7299 7625 7625 7625 7713 7555 8138 8296Software Progress

Major Events Planned 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1Major Events Actual 0 0 1 6 3 0 1 0 0 0

Progress Points Planned 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Progress Points Actual 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Effort-Software Planned 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90%Effort-Software Actual 64% 63% 37% 27% 0.6% 46.0% 21% 42% 50% 42%

Risks (Low) 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Risks (Med) 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Risks (High) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Project PlanningCost/Schedule Revs Planned 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cost/Schedule Revs Actual 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1Effort-Management Planned 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%

Effort-Management Actual 6% 5% 5% 3% 18.8% 3.0% 5% 0% 4% 4%Software Functionality

Requirements Planned 86.25 97.0 107.8 118.5 129.3 140.0 150.8 161.5 172.3 183.0Requirements Actual 61 142 157 157 157 157 160 160 181 184

Software QualityFSW Defect Count 0 0 2 3 4 0 20 8 1 0

non-FSW Defect Count 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 0Inspections Planned 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1

Inspections Actual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Effort-Quality Planned 0.2 0 0 0 0.2 0.2 0 0.2 0 0.2

Effort-Quality Actual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0 0Configuration Management

VDD Reviews Planned 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1VDD Reviews Actual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

CM Meetings Planned 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CM Meetings Actual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Requirements ManagementRequirements Changes 17 52 2 3 5 1 2 1 1 0

Effort-Engineering 17% 5% 9% 26% 35.2% 0.0% 8.4% 5.7% 3% 9%

46PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

Defect Chart

Boot Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11EXEC 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0BKG 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0CMD 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0TM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0HSK 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0LD 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0UTIL 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0IO 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0PWR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Total 0 2 3 2 0 10 4 0 0

Oper Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11EXEC 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0BKG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CMD 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0TM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0HSK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LD 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0UTIL 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0IO 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0PWR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0SSR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CMP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0STAT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0SEP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0SWIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0SWEA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LPW 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0MAG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Total 0 0 0 2 0 10 4 1 0

47PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

Safety and Mission Assurance Quarterly Status Report (QSR)

NOVEMBER 2011

Jorg Fischer, PFP SMA

48PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

SMA SUMMARY

OCTOBER 2011

SMA received FM parts from GSFC and started on FM parts kits, prepared and supported layout reviews, SOW, and PWB fabrication and assembly preparation efforts; supported ESD and calibration checks. Alert checks were performed – no new issues.We received the first flight fastener order and QA is in process of incoming and dimensional inspections.

49PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

SMA SUMMARY

SMA support of FSW reviews and inspections was provided. Operators attended NASA workmanship training classes. The QA team provided follow-up support for the MAVEN Travel Book Documentation to the EEE and Mechanical teams. QA provided an incoming inspection report sheet and updated PFR form. Also, QA attended the NASA supply chain conference held on October 18th-20th, at GFSC.

50PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

SMA SUMMARY - MAVEN FLT KITS

• FLIGHT kits for SWIA Digital, SWEA Digital, SWIA Anode, PFDPU DCB, IIB, SWEA LVPS, SWIA LVPS, SWIA Sweep, STATIC Sweep, SEP DFE, LPW Axial Boom Unit Wiring, Frangibolt SIM Wiring, and Harnesses.

51PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

SMA MONTHLY DETAILS

• October 2011 Details

52PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

SMA SUPPORT

• Layout package reviews and submittal preparation for sending to PWB vendor

• Processing of Board Fabrication Quotes and set up of Purchase Agreements to VSC

• Support of the Flight Layouts and PO’s

53PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

SMA - MAVEN PARTS

Meetings with the design engineers for parts replacements and REG Board BOM•Produced FLIGHT kits (see slide 4)•Ordered the VM1676 voltage multiplier•Kit the TDC Engineering Model•Support of weekly PW Board Status report •Received, inspected, filed actives parts from GSFC•Sent parts to GSFC, LASP, per requests.•Ordered magnetics terminals•Continued to order parts for both EM and FM boards

54PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

FSW - SOFTWARE

• Software review and inspections• Flight Software User Manual MAVEN_PF_FSW_007_SUM_BOOT• Boot Flight Software Comprehensive Performance Test

ReportMAVEN_PF_FSW_023_CPT_111024• Flight Software Code Inspection Report

MAVEN_PF_FSW_024_Inspection• Boot Flight Software Long Duration Test Report:

MAVEN_PF_FSW_025_LDS_110917• FSW Version Description Document:

MAVEN_PF_FSW_027_VDD_V103

55PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

SMA - MATERIAL PARTS CONTROL

• Weekly PCB meeting – refer to minutes.• Incoming inspections for active flight parts: - Again, Item was shipped with pink poly material- No shipping documents were provided. - Resolution: Documented and contacted vendor. Vendor

promised to sent the appropriate and required documents.

- QA provided an incoming inspection report sheet and updated PFR form

56PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

SMA - MATERIAL PARTS CONTROL

• UCB SSL SMA consulted on layout and PC board fabrication specifications and standards, PCB connector and wire modifications, and supported Read Me files, SOW, and PO specifications.

• Layout packages review and submittal to PWB vendor• RFQ processing and reviews• QA supported flight fastener order. • QA is in process of flight fastener incoming and

dimensional inspections• Support of fabrication and specification for Flight

Harnesses• EM support: Bonding of sample board into frame for

PFDPU with 9309/BN

57PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

ESD & CALIBRATION CONTROL

• ESD Control Plan– Update to RevB.– Class 0 workstation location and procedure research in

progress.

• ESD Checks and Surveys– Performed ESD checks – no issues– Internal ESD MAVEN surveys for GSFC

• Calibration Database– Revised and updated database

58PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

ALERTS

Alert Responses: No impactNA-MSFC-2011-001 QQ8-A-11-01A E4-A-11-01 SC7-P-11-02 NA-KSC-2011-004 and a materials issue (email only -no number provided)

59PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

SMA - GENERAL

• Support of Project planning, procurement, fabrication , and assembly processes.

• Other activities included the normal, ongoing participation in team and instrument meetings, parts and test discussions, documentation reviews and comments for procurements. QA provided stockroom, shipping, and parts services to MAVEN.

60PFP MSR, 11/15/2011

Issues Concerns

• Fabrication of PWB control – Selected alternative PWB vendor, for in parallel production, in case PWB coupon failure

• Fabrication and assembly of PWA. Vendor selection in progress. RFQs received, SMA site visits planned

• Material Control – Incoming Inspection Report issued