1 local consultative committees a.kuhk / j. verleye departement architectuur sint-lucas brussels

11
1 LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES A.Kuhk / J. Verleye Departement Architectuur Sint-Lucas Brussels

Upload: abigail-griffin

Post on 02-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES A.Kuhk / J. Verleye Departement Architectuur Sint-Lucas Brussels

1

LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES

A.Kuhk / J. VerleyeDepartement Architectuur

Sint-Lucas Brussels

Page 2: 1 LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES A.Kuhk / J. Verleye Departement Architectuur Sint-Lucas Brussels

2

Introduction

Aim of a framework for LCC’s:To facilitate comparison of results

LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE

Scale Degree Composition

of intervention of intervention and relations

The co-ordination of the PICT-project in Brussels is lead by Dag Boutsen, Annette Kuhk, Martijn Stellingwerff, Johan Verleye and Johan Verbeke, some of which are members of the CAAD-group Sint-Lucas.

Page 3: 1 LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES A.Kuhk / J. Verleye Departement Architectuur Sint-Lucas Brussels

3

Topics of Discussion

Kind of urban intervention

Actors involved

Composition and functioning of the LCC

Page 4: 1 LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES A.Kuhk / J. Verleye Departement Architectuur Sint-Lucas Brussels

4

Comparison of cases

Differences in: Scale Duration and phasing Budget Legal frame

Neigh

bour

hood

con

tract

s

Expa

nsio

n are

as

Urban

rege

nera

tion

Site

s of

regi

onal

impo

rtan

ce

Densifi

catio

n

Social

dev

elop

men

t

Page 5: 1 LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES A.Kuhk / J. Verleye Departement Architectuur Sint-Lucas Brussels

5

Actors in the cases

Co-ordination and hierarchies

• Overview and classification

ExecutiveElectedofficials Legislative

Withinthe state

Appointed officials

Interest groupsResearch Organisations

Insociety

Mass Media

Table: Classification of political and societal actors, based on Howlett and Ramesh (1995, p. 52)

Page 6: 1 LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES A.Kuhk / J. Verleye Departement Architectuur Sint-Lucas Brussels

6

Setup of LCC’s

Composition (cfr. actors in case) Relations and positions Tasks of the LCC Timing

CITIZENS

PLANNERS

Voluntary groups

Entrepreneurs

Political actors

Societal actors

Collaborative framework = LCC

Page 7: 1 LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES A.Kuhk / J. Verleye Departement Architectuur Sint-Lucas Brussels

7

Composition of the LCC’s

Distribution of:AgeGenderEthnicityEducational levelInstitutionalisationProfessionsBudgets

etc.

To compare conditions of LCC’s in different cases

Analysis of:

Degree of involvement at different stages of the project

Competencies in terms of use of ICT

Needs in terms of use of ICT

Page 8: 1 LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES A.Kuhk / J. Verleye Departement Architectuur Sint-Lucas Brussels

8

Tasks of the LCC’s

Learning for PARTICIPATIONfacilitator for effective mediationbetween planners and clients

Innovative ICT trainingpreparation and implementation

LCC: Executive or developing?

Page 9: 1 LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES A.Kuhk / J. Verleye Departement Architectuur Sint-Lucas Brussels

9

Brussels’ Real Life

A matter of perspective!‘Birds and Mice’‘Have and have nots’

?

Page 10: 1 LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES A.Kuhk / J. Verleye Departement Architectuur Sint-Lucas Brussels

10

What This Means

Power of LCC:development AND implementation

Smoothen the path for technological innovation in inclusive planning modes

Different design for urban developments?

Page 11: 1 LOCAL CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEES A.Kuhk / J. Verleye Departement Architectuur Sint-Lucas Brussels

11

Next Steps

Brief survey on LCC’s and cases Follow-up questionnaire on tasks

and implementation of new ICT through the LCC’s

Concluding report on effectiveness and efficiency of LCC’s