1 gie annual conference madrid, 22-23 november 2007 investing in europe‘s future – the role of...
TRANSCRIPT
1
GIE Annual Conference
Madrid, 22-23 November 2007
Investing in Europe‘s Future – the Role of Regulators
David HalldearnSenior Adviser, European Affairs
OFGEM
2 GIE Annual Conference 2007
Networks have Public Interest Functions
• Fair network access is central to competitive markets
• Secure supplies consumers based on reliable networks
• Diverse energy supplies requires investment in network infrastructure
• Networks are a significant cost to energy users – efficiency is therefore important
• Networks tend to be monopolies – where competition doesn’t work easily
• Network companies have significant public interest responsibilities – more than most other energy companies
3 GIE Annual Conference 2007
What Do We Want From Network Companies?
• A European Grid
• Efficient Investment
• Security of network operation
• Networks which provide the basis for competitive markets
These things do not yet exist across the Union – there is a ‘regulatory gap’
4 GIE Annual Conference 2007
What is the ‘regulatory gap’?
• Despite developing regional markets and current EU legislation, existing national markets, and market designs, create a “regulatory gap”
• National regulatory systems foster investment and fair trade:
• Regulatory certainty over the rules for investment and cost recovery
• Strong independent regulators to oversee the market
• These things do not exist for cross border investments• Reliance on contracts – no framework for regulated investments
• Contract based investments subject to uncertainty – Government involvement, competition law, and A22 exemptions in some cases
• And many regulators do not have the necessary tools to do the job
5 GIE Annual Conference 2007
How does the 3rd Package Measure Up?
ACER advises Commission
Commission ‘invites’ ENTSO to draft 11 codes
ENTSO seeks agreement of ACER to draft codes
ACER agrees
Voluntary codes
ACER disagrees
ACER advises Commission
Comitology
Binding ‘Guidelines’
6 GIE Annual Conference 2007
Is the relationship between ACER and ENTSO right?
This? Or this?
ACER ENTSOACER
ENTSO
7 GIE Annual Conference 2007
TSOs may not get what they need for investment
• How can ACER give investors regulatory certainty if it just advises the Commission?
• National Regulators will be given powers and have European duties
• But can they take account of voluntary codes when making regulatory decisions – e.g on investments?
• If one regulator allows such investments and another does not, what will be the decision when they are taken to Court?
• How does this lead to regulatory certainty?
• Not good for TSOs, or regulators, or customers
• This problems must be addressed by Council and Parliament
8 GIE Annual Conference 2007
What would work?
ACER advises Commission
Commission makes ‘framework’ proposals to comitology
ENTSO drafts codes to meet ‘framework’ requirements
ACER agrees
Acer disagrees
ENTSO revise codes
Binding Codes
9 GIE Annual Conference 2007
What happens in the interim?
ERGEG and GIE will have close discussions to prepare• Regulator and regulated are two sides of the same coin:
ERGEG are developing ‘mandate’ for the list of 11 codes• Opinion on content, scope and purpose
• How ACER will assess codes when drafted
• Basis of ACER approval and advice to Commission
Structures of ACER will be developed
Regional Initiative will be reinforced • To make practical progress in the interim
10 GIE Annual Conference 2007
Conclusion
• TSOs and Regulators have a common interest in a predictable regulatory framework for investment
• Amendments to the current Proposals are needed to get the balance right
• Contracts as the basis for investment will continue to be very important
• clarity is needed on the rules of the game here too
• Efforts must be increased to make progress in the interim through the Regional Initiatives
• We cannot wait for legislation!
11 GIE Annual Conference 2007
Thank You
David Halldearn – Director, European Affairs