1 buddhist engagements with social justice: a comparison between exiled tibetan buddhists in...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Buddhist Engagements with Social Justice: A comparison between exiled Tibetan Buddhists in
Dharamsala and Dalit Buddhists of Pune.
Tamsin Bradley & Zara Ramsay
2
Focus on two Indian locations: Pune and Dharamsala (home to Dalai Lama & Tibetan refugees)
Reasons for this comparative paper: Monolithic perceptions of religion amongst western NGO workers in India
Core argument: Buddhism both shapes and is shaped by local socio-
political environments; its impact on development visions/approaches must be evaluated by context
Overview
3
Dharamsala: 1. Tibetans persecuted because of faith 2. Long-standing Buddhist beliefs have shaped the Tibetan response to persecution – gentle, even passive
Pune:1. Ambedkarite Buddhism was created in order to tackle social injustice – vocal, potentially aggressive
Contrasts
4
Individuality is an illusion
Spiritual liberation (nirvana) = ultimate realisation of ‘oneness’
Consequent rejection of human division/ stratification, linked to Buddhist focus on compassion (karuna) and loving kindness (metta)
Buddhist principles: Interconnection and compassion
5
To demand Tibetan sovereignty = assertion of inherent division between humans
Dalai Lama “allows the Chinese to take advantage of Tibet as long as there is some level of dignity”
Tibetan Buddhism: Interconnection and compassion
6
Interconnection/oneness must be taught to ALL people – Dalits should demand this recognition
Dalits should also demand compassion from others; should expect the assistance of others in process of their development
Ambedkarite Buddhism: Interconnection and compassion
7
The notion that one is cosmically punished/rewarded for one’s actions, usually in one’s next incarnation
Has frequently been interpreted as fatalism
Buddhist principles:Karma
8
Fatalism? Debates have even questioned whether Tibetan Buddhists would say that Jewish people ‘deserved’ the Holocaust
Not entirely fatalistic; a psychological tool for acceptance/peace of mind
Tibetan Buddhism:Karma
9
Rejects the multiple-birth interpretation of karma
Emphasises the karmic response in current lifetime
Encourages hope and effort for development
Ambedkarite Buddhism:Karma
10
Pune: Struggle for social equality is based on
desire for development. Buddhism provides a practical methodology for this.
Dharamsala: Struggle for development is based on desire
for religious and national freedom. Buddhism is the priority and the goal, as well as the methodology.
Reasons for social justice
11
Tibetan Buddhism and Ambedkarite Buddhism promote very different attitudes towards the struggles for social justice and development
Not only are the approaches to these struggles different, but the relative importance of religion vis-a-vis development is very different in each place too.
Summary