1

August 23, 2010

Jefferson Lab Status

Hugh Montgomery

2

Outline

• Jefferson Lab Nuclear Physics Strategic Plan/Vision

• Laboratory Organization and Personnel

• Other Laboratory Activities and Issues

• Longer Term Future

• Summary

3

Jefferson Lab At-A-Glance

• Created to build and Operate the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF), world-unique user facility for Nuclear Physics

– Mission is to gain a deeper understanding of the structure of matter • Through advances in fundamental research in nuclear physics

• Through advances in photon science and related research – In operation since 1995– 1,258 Active Users (World’s largest Nuclear Physics User Community)– 159 Completed Experiments to date; ~21 remaining in 6 GeV program– Produces ~1/3 of US PhDs in Nuclear Physics (334 PhDs granted, 226 more in progress)

• Managed for DOE by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC (JSA)

• Human Capital: – 720 FTEs (at 3/15/10)– 22 Joint faculty, 19 Post docs, 30 Undergraduate; 47 Graduate students– 1,258 Users (end of FY09)– 1,110 Visiting Scientists

• K-12 Science Education program serves as national model

• Site is 169 Acres, and includes:– 63 Buildings; 685K SF in DOE Buildings– Replacement Plant Value: $318M FY2010

Total Lab Operating Budget: $124.1MNon-DOE Budget: $5.0M

4

Vision, Mission, Strategy

Vision

Mission

Strategy

To be the provider of choice for world-class science and facilities in support of the DOE Office of Science’s mission. To enable breakthroughs that ensure our nation’s future

Advance fundamental research in nuclear physics to gain a deeper understanding of the structure of matter

Advance photon science and related research into the nature of materials.

Develop the key technology and position Jefferson Lab’s user facilities for continued leadership roles

Accelerator Science

Applied Nuclear Science & Tech

Large Scale User Fac./Adv. Instr.

Major Laboratory Initiatives

Co

re C

ap

ab

ilit

y G

rou

pin

gs

JLAMP and4th GLS

12 GeV Upgrade Project

Exp. NuclearPhysics Program

ELectron IonCollider

SRFTechnology

Photon Science

Nuclear Physics

5

Science Strategy for the Future

Science in the 21st Century• Physics, Chemistry, Biology – major progress based on:

– Advanced accelerator facilities

– Operation as international user facilities

• Nuclear Physics:

– Execute the 12 GeV Upgrade Project

• Highly recommended by NSAC

– Experimental Nuclear Physics Program, 6 GeV, 12 GeV

• Nuclear physics into 2020s

– Develop Electron Ion Collider, extend beyond CEBAF scope

• Photon Science:

– 4th Generation Light Sources: JLAMP facility

– User driven photon science, accelerator R&D Program

– Development and participation in future light sources

6

Strategy for the Future – Major Initiative Experimental Nuclear Physics Program

Scientific exploitation of CEBAF at 6 GeV and 12 GeV

Outstanding physics remains that is best done utilizing the capabilities of the present CEBAF accelerator and its experimental equipment during the 2 years remaining before the final Upgrade shutdown. Once the 12 GeV Upgrade Project is completed, we envisage a program of experimental measurements for in excess of ten years.

• The Vision for the program:

– Enables the national scientific strategy of understanding the structure of matter

– Enables completion of 8 of 13 Office of Science milestones for hadronic physics

– Aims for excellence and pre-eminence in a number of key areas of nuclear physics:• Confinement and its manifestation in hadronic states with exotic quantum numbers;• the structure of hadrons;• the structure of nuclei;• Standard Model tests via high precision at low energy.

7

Jefferson Lab Organization

Director

H. Montgomery

Accelerator ScienceAdvisory Comm.

Nuclear PhysicsProgram Adv. Comm.

Photon ScienceProgram Adv. Comm.

University Relations

Deputy DirectorScience & Tech

R. McKeown

Deputy DirectorOperations and Chief

Operating Officer

M. Dallas

Experimental Physics

L. Cardman

Accelerator

A. Hutton

Theoretical & Computational

Physics

D. Richards (acting)

Free ElectronLaser

G. Neil

12 GeV Project Office

C. Rode

Chief Financial Officer &

Business Srvs.

J. Scarcello

Environmental Safety, Health

& Quality

M. Logue

Chief Information Officer/Chief

Technical Officer

R. Whitney

Engineering

W. Oren

Facilities &Logistics

J. Sprouse

Legal Counsel

Project Management and Integrated Planning

Community Outreach, Science Education and Public Affairs

Human Resources

Internal Audit

JSA Board of Directors Chair

8

Personnel Changes

• Deputy Laboratory Director – Science Bob McKeown

• AD for Theoretical and Comp. Physics Mike Pennington

• Deputy AD for Accelerators Fulvia Pilat

• 12 GeV Project APM Physics Glenn Young

• Hall D Leader Eugene Chudakov (ex Hall A)

Very Pleased with these appointments

• Experimental Nuclear Physics Dennis Skopik -- Partial Retirement last July

Kees de Jager -- has asked to step down as Hall A leader

Larry Cardman -- has asked to step down as AD for Exp. Nucl. Phys.

Search Committee is active

9

-

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15

$K

12 GeV - $310M TPC - May-2009

Pre-Ops

ARRA

Construction

PED

R&D

CDR/ACD

ARRA “Stimulus” Funds = early receipt of ~half of planned FY10

& FY11 funds Lengthy Federal budgetContinuing Resolution in FY11

is a concern.

12 GeV - $310M Total Project Cost(as of May 2009)

CD-4ADec 2014

CD-4BJun 2015

10

12 GeV UPGRADE SCHEDULE

Physics schedule unchanged.

Cryomodule install/testing moved into 6-month down.

Use FY10 downs;shift acceleratorinstallation workinto 6-month down.

MANDATE:Do not put follow-on beam delivery at risk !!!

Start of Commissioning:

Hall A October 2013

Hall D April 2014

Halls B and C October 2014

11

CIVIL CONSTRUCTION - Hall D Complex

June-July 2010

Hall D

Counting House Basement Walls/Stairwell

Hall D – NW CornerLast wall lift

12

Ready for Equipment – May 5th five months ahead of Level 2 Milestone Date

Cryogenics equipment installationunderway

CHL Building Addition Erected Steel

CIVIL CONSTRUCTION – Central Helium Liquefier (CHL) #2

Interior

13

Accelerator Construction Highlights

• cryomodule cavities• beam transport magnets• cryogenics coldbox• vacuum valves• cold tuner• etc. etc. etc.

Power Systems – Parts arriving (October 2009)Power Systems – parts arriving

Beam Transport Quadrupole Magnets (~60 of 114) at JLab

First 4 meter Dipole Magnet at JLab

14

Hall B Detectors

HTCC prototype molds and mirrors (JLab)

BC-404BC-408

Panel 1a

SVT sensor bonding and probe testing (UNH and Moscow State)

Drift Chamber R2 wire stringing (ODU, and Idaho State)

FTOF PMTs and timing test results (US Carolina, JLab)

15

Hall C - SHMS Infrastructure

1st Cryogenic Control ReservoirMagnet Control Racks

SHMS and HMS in Hall C

Dipole vendor proposed

Support Structure and Shield House Manufacturing Design

progressing

HB and Q1 Contracts Awarded

Q2/Q3 - 5 bids received

16

Hall D DetectorsBarrel Calorimeter Sixteenth Production

Module

The Mighty BCAL Press

First BCAL Modules Arrive!

Preparing Solenoid Test

Central Drift Chamber Endplates

17

Upgrade Project Status

• Overall Project (End of June 2010)– Funding $145M– Cost Performance Index 0.94– Schedule Performance Index 0.97

• On average less than a month behind schedule• Contingencies maintained

– Contingency ~$60M, • ~50% of Est. To Complete. • FY11 is very constrained• Availability projected for FY12 and FY13

– Effort on Project exceeds 120FTE• Lehman Review (April 2010)

– Very Satisfactory Review• Manpower management , appeared satisfactory• Schedule holding, civil schedule recovering

– Concerns• Hall D Solenoid

18

FundingFY09

Approp FY10

Approp

FY11Pres.

Budg.

Summary Comments

ME Research 6,150 6,200 6,265

Theory Research 3,400 3,599 4,150

Accel Ops 47,120 47,140 49,328

Accel Capital Equipment 130 200 200

SRF R&D 1,635 1,365 1,400

Accel AIP 950 1,050 1,050

Exp Sup Ops 24,559 25,567 24,800

Exp Support Capital Equipment 4,500 5,200 4,700

GPP 1,800 2,000 2,000

Subtotal NP Base 90,244 92,321 93,893

12 GeV 28,623 20,000 36,000

Subtotal NP Base & 12 GeV 118,867 112,321 129,893

National LQCD Ops & CE 380 223 231

SciDAC 371 299 309

Total NP 119,618 112,843 130,433

Funding FY09, FY10, FY11

• Favorable President’s Budget Request

• $1.8M up from FY10, but less than cost of living

• $2M pressure

Receiving supplemental funding to enable g2p/gep

19

FY11 Budget and Consequences

• As yet there is no FY11 Budget– Senate Markup is -$100M wrt SC Pres. Request

• Specifics are not good for nuclear physics• Upgrade is not impacted

– House Markup is -$200M wrt SC Pres. Request• Details not available, but rumored to be bad.

• Continuing Resolution expected – “6 month” CR

• Will start running as planned, no advantage in delay• 12 GeV Project can ride 3 months OK

– “12 month” CR• Will need to curtail running• Major reduction in 12 GeV Project work, major delay

20

• Facilities: Resolve critical shortage and poor quality of space by constructing 278,000 sq ft and refurbishing 280,000 sq ft of work space; addressing safety and building code issues by updating outdated building systems; reducing deferred maintenance; and increasing energy efficiency.

– Technology Engineering Development Facility (TEDF) (SLI) provides 38% of new and 31% of refurbished space (CD-3A approved 3/26/10)

– CEBAF Center Expansion and Rehab (SLI 2016) ~ 34% of new space

– Lab’s $32M GPP investment provides ~28% of new space.

• Utilities: Replace/upgrade 20-40 year old site utilities to meet SC mission requirements by increasing cryogenics capability; increasing capacity and adding redundancy to the power distribution system; increasing cooling water capacity to meet mission requirements and replacing site cooling towers.

– Utility Infrastructure Modernization Project (SLI 2011)

• Communications: Upgrade 1960s subsurface communications systems with 627 miles of fiber optic cable and 42 miles of building computer cable (SLI 2011).

Strategy To Modernize JLab

21

Technology and Engineering Development Facility

Test Lab Rehab

SRF AdditionTED Building

• Addition to Test Lab for SRF

• TED Bldg for Engineering & Shops

• Rehab Test Lab

• Eliminate Unsuitable Space

22

TEDF+ Project Status• Status

– Project Construction Phase is underway• Schedule

– CD-1 Sep 08 (complete)– CD-2 Jul 09– CD-3 A

• 2nd Qtr FY 2010– CD-3 B

• 4th Qtr FY 2010– CD-4

• New construction 4th Qtr FY 2012• Rehab 4th Qtr FY 2014

• General Plant Project ARRA Funding from Office of Nuclear Physics– Important ancillary work on buildings such as End Station Refrig. Buiilding

23

Strategy for the Future – Major Initiative ELectron Ion Collider (ELIC)

Further extension of electron – nucleus scattering physics

Developing the concept and the physics case and initial design of a future ELectron Ion Collider is essential to understand the future evolution of experimental nuclear physics in the U.S.A. and in the world. According to the 2007 NSAC Long Range Plan, “The ELIC would explore the new QCD frontier of strong color fields in nuclei and precisely image the gluons in the proton.” Goal is to develop the PHYSICS CASE for the next long range plan.

• The Vision for the program:

– The next generation of electroweak nuclear physics beyond CEBAF at 12 GeV would demand an Electron Ion Collider

• TJNAF will participate in the development of the physics case for the EIC

• TJNAF will engage in R&D to develop accelerator and detector technology enabling a very high luminosity, polarized Electron Ion Collider. An initial stage, a medium-energy electron-ion-collider, MEIC, would accommodate subsequent energy upgrade.

• MEIC would be a high-luminosity, polarized electron-ion collider which would use CEBAF as injector into an electron storage ring.

• MEIC would have a center-of-mass energy of 10-50 GeV and extremely high luminosity approaching 1x1035 cm-2s-1 . The high luminosity is crucial to probe unknown essential features of the proton landscape, such as the impact of spin-orbit correlations.

• The booster rings, electron collider ring, and ion collider ring are designed as a “figure 8”, a design directly aimed at spin physics opportunities.

• The range of nuclei considered includes polarized light ions (1H, 2H, and 3He) and medium to heavy nuclei (such as 12C, 40Ca, and 197Au).

24

Strategy for the Future - Major Initiative JLAMP and 4th Generation Light Sources

A Next Generation Photon Science Facility at Jefferson LabTJNAF has existing platforms with which it could demonstrate accelerator physics and technologies that address the needs of light source facilities as outlined in BESAC’s report “Directing Matter and Energy:Five Challenges for Science and the Imagination”. BESAC also delivered a position paper “Next Generation Photon Sources for Grand Challenges in Science and Energy” to SC. Two approaches to producing the required photons are identified: Free Electron Lasers and Energy Recovering Linacs. TJNAF has world class expertise in both technologies.

TJNAF received funding from BES to participate in R&D, focusing on cavity and cryomodule development ultimately to permit the demonstration of well controlled, pulse-to pulse repeatable, high duty factor X-ray bursts of femtoseconds duration and unprecedented brightness.

• The Vision for the program:Jefferson Lab has proposed to build a continuous wave, high average brightness, short pulse free electron laser operating in the VUV/soft X-ray regime named JLAMP (Jefferson Lab AMPlifier). JLAMP would produce photons at an average brightness exceeding that of the FLASH facility in Germany. JLAMP would provide a platform for:

– Ultrafast studies of emergent/correlated behavior in complex and nanomaterials related to energy and the environment, and with a strong user base of support as defined in recent BES reports.

– Research in accelerator concepts which have the potential for substantial reduction of costs and better performance for future large-scale light sources.

– Eventual participation in construction of a large scale next generation light source wherever it is built.

– Accelerator research and training relevant to DoD ONR.

25

Summary

PAC role is to provide advice with respect to the experimental nuclear physics program which is the core activity of the laboratory.

We are concurrently constructing the 12 GeV Upgrade Project.

We are also taking opportunities to upgrade the laboratory facilities and infrastructure.

Consequently there are challenges to balance the different activities within constrained resources.

(But we are getting support from Office of Nuclear Physics.)

We are also looking to the long term future of Jefferson Laboratory