1. 2 david humes theory of knowledge (1711-1776) scottish empiricist

35
1

Upload: dana-robinson

Post on 19-Jan-2018

238 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

3 An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding Foundation of all knowledge is in sensory experience

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

11

Page 2: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

22

David Hume’s Theory David Hume’s Theory of Knowledgeof Knowledge

(1711-1776)(1711-1776)Scottish EmpiricistScottish Empiricist

Page 3: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

33

An Enquiry Concerning An Enquiry Concerning Human UnderstandingHuman Understanding

Foundation of all knowledge is in Foundation of all knowledge is in sensory experiencesensory experience

Page 4: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

44

Can we have certain Can we have certain knowledge?knowledge?

YES!YES!

Page 5: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

55

Relation of IdeasRelation of Ideas

How our ideas relate to one anotherHow our ideas relate to one another

Analytic TruthsAnalytic TruthsTautologiesTautologies

Mathematical TruthsMathematical Truths

Page 6: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

66

Always can involve a contradictionAlways can involve a contradiction

““An unmarried man An unmarried man is notis not a bachelor” a bachelor”

Why is this a contradiction?Why is this a contradiction?

Because of how we define the termsBecause of how we define the terms

Page 7: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

77

All other knowledge?All other knowledge?

Page 8: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

88

Matters of FactMatters of Fact

Synthetic TruthsSynthetic Truths

Never can involve a contradictionNever can involve a contradiction

We can only have a high degree of We can only have a high degree of probabilityprobability

Page 9: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

99

ExampleExample

““The sun will rise tomorrow”The sun will rise tomorrow”

Page 10: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

1010

2 Types of Perceptions2 Types of Perceptions

Page 11: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

1111

ImpressionsImpressions

From From sense datasense data

ofofmind independent realitymind independent reality

Page 12: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

1212

Thoughts / IdeasThoughts / Ideas

FromFromOur memory ofOur memory of

ImpressionsImpressionsoror

ImaginationImagination

Page 13: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

1313

Difference between the two?Difference between the two?

Impressions are more lively than Impressions are more lively than thoughts or ideasthoughts or ideas

Page 14: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

1414

ExampleExample

Which is more lively:Which is more lively:

Actually burning your fingerActually burning your fingeroror

The memory of burning your finger?The memory of burning your finger?

Page 15: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

1515

Empirical Criteria of MeaningEmpirical Criteria of Meaning

1. All meaningful ideas must be traced 1. All meaningful ideas must be traced back to sense impressionback to sense impression

(Experience)(Experience)

Page 16: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

1616

2. Ideas and beliefs that cannot be traced 2. Ideas and beliefs that cannot be traced back to sense impression (experience) back to sense impression (experience)

are meaninglessare meaningless

Page 17: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

1717

ExampleExample

A golden mountainA golden mountain

A unicornA unicorn

GodGod

Page 18: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

1818

How would you explain color How would you explain color to a blind person?to a blind person?

You can’tYou can’t

They have no impression referenceThey have no impression reference

Page 19: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

1919

Cause and EffectCause and Effect

Page 20: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

2020

Page 21: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

2121

Cause and EffectCause and Effect

Cannot be traced back to impressionsCannot be traced back to impressions

It involves no contradictionIt involves no contradiction

Page 22: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

2222

For ExampleFor Example

Let’s take the sentence:Let’s take the sentence:

““X causes Y”X causes Y”

Where X and Y are both eventsWhere X and Y are both events

Page 23: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

2323

X is the event of billiard ball A X is the event of billiard ball A striking billiard ball Bstriking billiard ball B

Y is the event of billiard ball B moving Y is the event of billiard ball B moving after being struckafter being struck

Page 24: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

2424

Question:Question:Is the sentence “X causes Y” analytic?Is the sentence “X causes Y” analytic?

That is to say, is the sentence That is to say, is the sentence ““X does not cause Y” a self-contradiction?X does not cause Y” a self-contradiction?

Like:Like:

““A unmarried male is not a bachelor”A unmarried male is not a bachelor”

Page 25: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

2525

Answer:Answer:

NO!NO!

This sentence is not analytic!This sentence is not analytic!

Page 26: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

2626

Is this sentence synthetic?Is this sentence synthetic?

It seems that the answer will be yes It seems that the answer will be yes because this is the only alternativebecause this is the only alternative

But Hume had a problem with this But Hume had a problem with this answer too!answer too!

Page 27: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

2727

When he analyzed the concept of When he analyzed the concept of causality, he broke it down into three causality, he broke it down into three components:components:

1.1. PriorityPriority2.2. ContiguityContiguity3.3. Necessary ConnectionNecessary Connection

Page 28: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

2828

PriorityPriority

Means that X precedes YMeans that X precedes Y

This can be traced back to sense dataThis can be traced back to sense data

Page 29: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

2929

ContiguityContiguity

Means that X touches YMeans that X touches Y

This can also be traced back to sense This can also be traced back to sense datadata

Page 30: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

3030

Necessary Connection?Necessary Connection?

Means that if X happens, Y Means that if X happens, Y MUSTMUST happen happen

No matter how many times Hume looked No matter how many times Hume looked he could find no necessary connectionhe could find no necessary connection

Therefore, causality cannot be traced Therefore, causality cannot be traced back to sense databack to sense data

Page 31: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

3131

Implications?Implications?

Causality means that whenever we say Causality means that whenever we say that one thing (X) causes another thing that one thing (X) causes another thing

(Y)(Y)

We are really only reporting our own We are really only reporting our own EXPECTATIONS EXPECTATIONS

that X will be followed by Ythat X will be followed by Y

Page 32: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

3232

This is a psychological fact about us and This is a psychological fact about us and not a fact about the worldnot a fact about the world

Even if X was followed by Y innumerable Even if X was followed by Y innumerable times in the past, times in the past,

that does not justify our claim to know that does not justify our claim to know that it will do so again in the futurethat it will do so again in the future

Page 33: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

3333

And we assume that (A) caused (B)And we assume that (A) caused (B)

But all we have seen is two distinct But all we have seen is two distinct events that happen in successionevents that happen in succession

Page 34: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

3434

ExampleExample

The rooster always crows just before the The rooster always crows just before the sun risessun rises

Does that cause the sun to rise?Does that cause the sun to rise?NO!NO!

Page 35: 1. 2 David Humes Theory of Knowledge (1711-1776) Scottish Empiricist

3535

Causality is a matter ofCausality is a matter ofCUSTOMCUSTOM

andandHABITHABIT