06/032010 v.30DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

For NPC Study Discussion Only1

National Petroleum CouncilFuture Transportation Fuels Study

Proposed Coordinating Subcommittee Conference Call

June 3, 2010

1

06/032010 v.30

Safety

22

06/032010 v.30DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

For NPC Study Discussion Only

Antitrust Reminders – NPC Studies

• Remember the Antitrust Guidelines, and don’t– Coordinate your companies’ plans, prices, outputs– Disclose your company’s non-public information– Use the study process to create competitive harm

• Check with counsel before you– Collect or discuss non-public data– Evaluate public data about future prices and costs– Discuss topics about whose legality you’re unsure

• Antitrust resources include: your lawyer, and– Mike Young (Anadarko) 832-636-7555– Doug Melin (Marathon) 419-421-3265– Jim Haynes (Chevron) 925-842-1298– Courtney Lynch (Chevron) 925-842-6474 – Kenly Webster (NPC) 202-898-0780

06/032010 v.30

CSC Meeting Attendees

Linda Capuano, Chair Marathon Oil Corporation

Michael Leister, Asst Chair Marathon Oil Corporation

Andy Oliver, Secretary National Petroleum Council

S. Shariq Yosufzai Chevron Corporation

Deanne Short, Demand Task Group Chair Caterpiller

Stephen Brand, Technology Task Group Chair ConocoPhillips

Joseph Caggiano Chevron Corporation

Deron Lovaas, Member Natural Resources Defense Council

Jan Mares, Member Resources for the Future

Margaret Montana, Member Shell Downstream, Inc.

Bill Reinert, Member Toyota Motor Sales

Jim Richardson Chevron Corporation

Chris Sultemeier, Member Walmart

Gene Tunison, Alt for Steve Hart ExxonMobil Refining & Supply

Todd Werpy, Member Archer Daniels Midland Company

Nelson Almond, Alt Asst to Chair Marathon Petroleum Company LLC

Ken Croy Marathon Oil Company

Clay Bretches/Scott Moore Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

Doug Melin Marathon Petroleum Company LLC

06/032010 v.30

Agenda

55

06/032010 v.30

CSC Meeting AgendaThursday 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM EST

SafetyAnti-trust Reminders A. OliverReview/Confirm Meeting Notes N. AlmondCalendar N. AlmondAction Item Review N. AlmondReport Outs

– Coordinating Subcommittee L. Capuano

• June 10th Executive Committee Presentation– Demand Task Group D. Short– Supply & Infrastructure Task Group S. Yosufzai– Technology Task Group S. Brand

• DARPA and the FE Projects Review

New Business – Round Robin AllSummarize New Action Items N. Almond

06/032010 v.30

Coordinating Subcommittee Calendar

Date Time (EST) Highlight

Recurring Meetings• Tues 2:00 pm (30 Min) CSC/Supply & Infrastructure• Tues 3:00 pm (30 min) CSC/Demand• Tues 4:00 pm (30 min) CSC/Bio Fuels• Wed 10:00 am (30 min) CSC/Technology• Thu 11:00 am – 1:00 pm Weekly CSC call• Fri 9:30 am Weekly Fuels/Resource Chair one-on-oneDetails• June 9 (W) 8:30-5:30 CSC meeting in Washington - One Day• June 10 (Th) 10:00-11:00 Executive Committee call• July 26-27 (M-T) 8:00-5:00 CSC in Houston - Marriott Bush International• Sept 13-14 (Tentative) Full National Petroleum Council Meeting• Sept 20-22 (M-W) CSC meeting in Washington – Three Days• Nov (TBD) CSC meeting in Washington – Two Days• Nov (TBD) Executive Committee – Two hour conf. callResources Study Dates for Reference• Thursday (PM) Weekly Resource CSC• June 2, 2010 Resources CSC meeting• July 2010 Resources Executive Committee• Sept 2010 Resources Executive Committee

77

06/032010 v.30

Coordinating Sub-committee and Task Group Timeline

Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11

Coordinating Subcommittee Meetings

Supply & Infrastructure Task Group Supply & InfrastructureTechnology Task Group Technology

Biofuels Subgroup BiofuelsFossil Liquids Subgroup Fossil LiquidsElectric Subgroup ElectricNatural Gas Subgroup Natural GasEngine/Vehicle Subgroup Engine /VehicleNew Fuels Subgroup New Fuels

Define Fuel Characteristics of Interest

Demand Task Group Demand

Integration and Iterations of ScenariosDemand Task Group DemandSupply & Infrastructure Task Group Supply & InfrastructureTechnology Task Group

Subgroups

Study Activities

Communication and Outreach

TechnologySubgroups

Base Case and Acceleration Analysis

Develop and Pilot Sensitivity Analysis / Scenarios

Integrate and Iterate

Policy Insights - Report Validation and Review

Communications and Outreach

Base Case and Acceleration Analysis (Discovery)

Validate, Review and Document

Develop and Pilot Sensitivity Analysis / Scenarios

Provide Prel Findings to the Resources Study

Receive Prel Findings from Resources Study

Staffing

Study Meetings

NPC Council Meeting

Executive Committee Meeting

Staffing of Task Groups and Subgroups

Submit Draft and Final Report to Study Committee

Characteristics

06/032010 v.30

DARPA and Office of Fossil Energy Review

Technology Task Group

9DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

For NPC Study Discussion Only

06/032010 v.30

Technology Task Group Disruptive Technologies Review

DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Study Discussion Only

10

• Highlighted in Energy Secretary Chu’s Supplemental Letter ARPA-E – high-level review completed Office of Fossil Energy – high-level review completed, but there is a very long list of projects, many

similar projects under a theme (eg. biomass/coal co-gasification)• Office of Science. The ten Office of Science laboratories are: Ames Laboratory, Argonne National

Laboratory, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, and the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

• Other DARPA – high-level review completed

• So far, project primarily in biofuels, batteries/electrification, coal fuels, hydrogen from coal. Need to scan for R&D on others- eg. advanced engine technologies. Possibly being done in the Labs or private industry, but there has been recovery funding for advanced engine technologies

• Next steps• Work with sub groups to confirm disruptive technology scope • L1 SME group (which should include individuals from the organisations above) to review disruptive

technology scope

06/032010 v.30

DARPA Aviation Biofuels Activities Overview

11

Objective: bio-derived JP8

Processing Technologies• UOP. Hydrotreated Renewable Jet (HRJ) from renewable oils and fats. Two reaction sections: the Deoxygenation and

the Isomerization/Cracking. In the Deoxygenation, the feedstock oil is reacted with hydrogen to convert triglycerides and fatty acids to long chain normal paraffins, propane, water, and carbon oxides. In Isomerization/ Cracking section, the paraffins are converted to lower molecular weight jet range material (predominantly C9 to C15). Products are separated into a light fraction (LPG and others), a naphtha fraction and the jet (HRJ) fraction.

• Swedish Biofuels AB. Biofuels from biomass using grain crops, agricultural waste, wood and forestry waste. Sugars from feedstock are fermented into C2-C5 alcohols which is then converted by chemical synthesis into a mixture of C4-C18 hydrocarbons. The hydrocarbons are separated into biogasoline, kerosine and diesel.

Feedstock

Algae • General Atomics. Raceway ponds. Salt water. No GM strain. Patent-pending process improvements in growth

efficiency, cellular oil concentration, nutrient utilisation, reactor design, CO2 delivery and separation technology. Claims to be at ~ $6 or $7/gal

• SAIC. Wastewater. No GM strain. In 2001, SAIC researched and tested the use of periphyton algae for water treatment in Florida. Periphytons are a mixture of algae, cyanobacteria and other microbes that are important in water purification. As part of its DARPA contract, SAIC is developing several technologies and processes including integrating algae strain selection, water and nutrient sourcing, farming, harvesting, separation, triglyceride purification, algal oil processing, and economic modelling and analysis

Cellulosic• Logos Technologies and EdeniQ (incl. Novozymes, Ceres, NextStep, USDA, UC Davis). Corn to cellulose migration

plant (CCM), by adding stover (stalks, cobs and leaves) and switchgrass to current 1st gen operations. Portfolio of biological, chemical and mechanical technologies. Uses EdeniQ’s Cellunator- mechanical pretreatment that creates uniformly small particles without creating fines. EdeniQ also taking the same approach in Brazil.

DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Study Discussion Only

06/032010 v.30

Office of Fossil Energy – Selected Projects (not exhaustive)

12DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

For NPC Study Discussion Only

Project Technology Description Organisation Contact FTF subgroup

Continuation of Crosscutting Technology Development of Centre for Advanced Separation Technologies. Coal Fuels - Solid Fuels and Feedstocks

Develop advanced technologies in solid-solid and solid-liquid separations that can be used for producing high quality fuels

CAST (7 universities)

Roe-Hoan Yoon Fossil

Enzymatic Conversion of Coal to Liquid Fuels. Coal Fuels - Liquid Fuels

Create a novel process for the direct conversion of coal to liquid hydrocarbons by using enzymes specifically selected for this purpose

Coal Fuel Systems LLC

Richard Troiano Fossil

Product Characterization for Entrained Flow Coal/Biomass Co-Gasification. Coal Fuels - Liquid Fuels

Complete characterization of the gas, liquid, and solid products that result from the cogasification of three major coal types (bituminous, sub-bituminous, and lignite) with three biomass types: corn stover, wood, and switchgrass.

GE Energy and Environmental Research Corp

Boris Eiteneer Fossil

Production and Optimization of Coal-Derived, High-Hydrogen Content Fischer-Tropsch Liquids. Coal Fuels - Liquid Fuels

Production of barrel quantities of coal-derived liquids using iron-based FT)synthesis in a PDU-scale reactor. Investigate wax/catalyst separation, hydrotreating and hydrocracking of neat FT liquid products, and hydrogen yield from product reforming.

Headwaters Technology Innovation Group

Theo L.K. Lee Fossil

Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Utilization of Coal-Derived Fuels. Coal Fuels - Liquid Fuels

Develop a commercially viable Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) technology for coal-derived fuels building on copper-based design by Franklin Fuel Cells,

University of North Dakota Energy and Environmental Research Center

Phillip N. Hutton Fossil

Investigation of Hydrogen-Fueled Internal Combustion Engine Durability. Hydrogen from Coal

Evaluate the durability of a state-of-the-art hydrogen internal combustion engine (HICE) design. An existing state-of-the-art Engine design developed by participants ETEC and Roush Industries will be the basis of evaluation

Electric Transportation Engineering Corporation

Garrett Paul Beauregard

Fossil

06/032010 v.30

Future Transportation Fuels Study Action Items

•Refer to attached “Action Items Listing – Dated May 27, 2010”

06/032010 v.30

Future Transportation Fuels Study Core Committee Structure

Study Committee LeadershipChair Clarence Cazalot (Marathon)Government Cochair Dan Poneman (DOE)Alternate Gov Cochair Kristina Johnson (DOE)Supply & Infrastructure Vice Chair John Watson (Chevron)Demand Vice Chair Jim Owens (Caterpillar)Technology Vice Chair John Deutch (MIT)Secretary Marshall Nichols (NPC)

Supply & Infrastructure Task GroupChair S Yosufzai (Chevron)Govt. Cochair C Difiglio (DOE)Alt. Govt. Cochair T. White (DOE)Asst. Chair J Caggiano (Chevron)Secretary TBD (NPC)

Coordinating Subcommittee LeadershipChair Linda Capuano (Marathon)Government Cochair Steve Koonin (DOE)Alternate Government Cochair David Sandalow (DOE)Assistant Chair Mike Leister (Marathon)Supply & Infrastructure Task Group Chair Shariq Yosufzai (Chevron)Demand Task Group Chair Deanne Short (Caterpillar)Technology Task Group Chair Stephen Brand (ConocoPhillips)Secretary Andy Oliver (NPC)

Demand Task GroupChair D Short (Caterpillar)Govt. Cochair J Conti (DOE)Alt. Govt. Cochair P. Holtberg (DOE)Asst. Chair TBDSecretary TBD (NPC)

Technology Task GroupChair S Brand (CoP)Govt. Cochair J Beaudry-Losique (DOE)Alt. Govt. Cochair TBD (DOE)Asst. Chair TBDSecretary TBD (NPC)

06/032010 v.30

Future Transportation Fuels Coordinating Sub-Committee Rosteras of May 11, 2010

Alternate

Chair Linda Capuano Marathon Oil

Gov’t Co-Chair Steve Koonin Department of Energy (DOE) Avi Gopstein

Alt. Gov’t Co-Chair David Sandalow Department of Energy (DOE) Carmen Difliglio

Asst. Chair Mike Leister Marathon Oil Nelson Almond

Demand Task Group Chair Deanne Short Caterpillar

Supply & Infrastructure Task Group Chair Shariq Yosufzai Chevron Joseph Caggiano

Technology Task Group Chair Stephen Brand ConocoPhillips

BioFuels Subgroup Chair Todd Werpy Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) Tom Binder

Fossil Liquids Subgroup Chair Steve Hart ExxonMobil Gene Tunison

Electric Subgroup Chair Bill Reinert Toyota

Natural Gas Subgroup Chair TBD

New Fuels Subgroup Chair Targeted for July

Engine/Vehicle Subgroup Chair Alan Taub General Motors

Member Arthur Rypinski Department of Transportation

Member Chris Sultemeier Wal-Mart

Member Mitch Jackson FedEx

Member Paul Sankey Deutsche Bank Adam Sieminski

Member Peggy Montana Shell Claudia Kolbinger

Member Jan Mares Resources for the Future

Member Deron Lovaas Natural Resources Defense Council Roland Hwang

Member Richard Newell EIA John Conti

Member Matt Rogers Department of Energy (DOE)

06/032010 v.30

Secretary Chu’s Request Letter – September 19, 2009Secretary Chu’s Supplemental Question – April 30, 2010Summary: Secretary Chu’s RequestOperating PrinciplesGuiding QuestionsFuel Clusters-Technology-Supply ChainCluster In a Practical WayTask Group Composition MatrixDOE Organization of Future Transportation Fuels ParticipantsKey Milestones for NPC Resource and Fuels Studies Reference Material From Resources Study

Appendix

16

06/032010 v.30 17

Secretary Chu’s Request Letter – September 19, 2009

06/032010 v.30

Secretary Chu’s Supplemental Question – April 30, 2010

06/032010 v.30DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

For NPC Study Discussion Only19

Summary: Secretary Chu’s Request

• Study Future Transportation Fuels prospects through 2030 for auto, truck, air, rail and waterborne transport

• Address fuel demand, supply, infrastructure, and technology

• Advise on policy options and pathways for integrating new fuels and vehicles into the marketplace, including infrastructure development

– Address the transition to an expanded suite of reliable, secure and clean, low-carbon transportation fuels

– Evaluating options, risks, and consequences

• Factors to consider include– Technological advances– Manufacturing, distribution and infrastructure– Market dynamics and economic competitiveness– Cost/benefit tradeoffs– Customer expectations and acceptance– Environmental, e.g., impact on carbon, land and water

19

06/032010 v.30DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

For NPC Study Discussion Only20

Operating Principles

• Scope then execute– Develop a detailed scope of work for each task group before commencing work

• Diversify thought– Identify and involve a broad and diverse set of interests to participate in the study to

maximize input and acceptance

• Promote consensus based leadership

• Maximize the use of prior studies– Provide a broad review of current research– Conduct new studies only as needed

• Examine the facts then address policy– Advance basic analytical work sufficiently to reach consensus on the essential facts– Policy recommendation based upon an agreed upon factual environment

• Assess policy through three lenses– Environment– Economic– Security

• Integrate policy with NPC Resource Development study as necessary

• Plan communication and outreach – at inception and completion of the study

20

06/032010 v.30DRAFT – DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE

For NPC Study Discussion Only21

Guiding Questions

1. Define criteria for 2030 transportation fuels and relative improvement– Environment less GHG, land and water use– Security available resources, reliable infrastructure– Economic capital investment, operating costs, achievable at scale,

competitive,subsidy requirements

2. Describe 2030 baseline for transportation fuels based upon available studies

3. Identify technological advances, changes in supply, infrastructure and demand that could accelerate the transition to a more environmentally friendly, secure and economically competitive fuel mix

4. Provide insight on government and industry investments which could increase the probability of technological advances

5. Provide insight on the environment impacts such as GHG, water and land use

6. Provide insight on acceptance of these accelerated transportation fuels

7. Consider 2050 – describe the potential 2030 interim states or scenarios which could accelerate progress to a more advanced fuels mix by 2050

21

06/032010 v.30NPC Draft – Do Not Cite or Quote

FEEDSTOCK / RAW

MATERIALS

FEEDSTOCKDISTRIBUTION

CONVERSION / MANUFACTURING

PRODUCTDISTRIBUTION

FUEL CLUSTERS

Fossil Hydrocarbon

Biofuels

Natural Gas

Electricity

Post-2050 Fuels

APPLICATION/ END USE

Auto

Truck

Rail

Water

Air

31

2

Classify fuels into clusters

Trace each cluster through baseline and alternative pathways along the supply chain -- use various assumptions about technology, volumes, infrastructure, unit costs, policy, etc.

Connect supply inputs to end-use options

Technology

Fuel Clusters -Technology - Supply Chain (Simple Flowchart)

06/032010 v.30 23

Supply & Infrastructure DemandTechnology

Cluster In a practical Way

Task Groups

FossilLiquids

Electric 2050 FuelsBiofuels Natural Gas

Fuel Clusters

Transportation Clusters

Auto Rail AirBus Truck Water

Cross Cutting Topics

Anti-Trust Communication GHG/CarbonPolicy Security Environment

Pipeline

Engine Clusters

Internal Combustion

Electric Turbine

Passenger Freight

Land Air Water

2050 Engines

EconomicFinancial

06/032010 v.30 24

Task Group Composition Matrix

Demand

Supply & Infrastructure

Technology

Potential Task Group MembersGov’t Resource

SuppliersDistributors (Resource & Product)

Resource Processing/ Conversion

Auto Makers/Component Suppliers

Non-auto Engines/ Prime Movers

Interest Groups/ NGO’sIndustry Association

Universities/ Laboratories/Technical Consortia

Consultancies/Professional Societies

06/032010 v.30

Office of the SecretaryDr. Steven Chu, Secretary

Daniel B. Poneman,Deputy Secretary

Office of the SecretaryDr. Steven Chu, Secretary

Daniel B. Poneman,Deputy Secretary

Office of theUnder Secretary

Dr. Kristina M. JohnsonUnder Secretary

Office of theUnder Secretary

Dr. Kristina M. JohnsonUnder Secretary

Office of theUnder Secretary for Science

Dr. Steven E. KooninUnder Secretary for Science

Office of theUnder Secretary for Science

Dr. Steven E. KooninUnder Secretary for Science

Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy

Catherine R. Zoi

Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy

Catherine R. Zoi

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary

Dr. Henry C. Kelly

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary

Dr. Henry C. Kelly

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Renewable

Energy

Jacques Beaudry-Losique

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Renewable

Energy

Jacques Beaudry-Losique

Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy

Dr. James J. Markosky

Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy

Dr. James J. Markosky

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Oil &

Natural Gas

Christopher Smith

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Oil &

Natural Gas

Christopher Smith

Energy Information Administration

Dr. Richard G. NewellAdministrator

Energy Information Administration

Dr. Richard G. NewellAdministrator

Office of Policy &International Affairs

David B. SandalowAssistant Secretary for Policy

& International Affairs

Office of Policy &International Affairs

David B. SandalowAssistant Secretary for Policy

& International Affairs

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy

Analysis

Dr. Carmen Difiglio

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy

Analysis

Dr. Carmen Difiglio

Office of the Chief of Staff

Matthew C. RogersSenior Advisor to the

Secretary

Office of the Chief of Staff

Matthew C. RogersSenior Advisor to the

Secretary

Office of Integrated Analysis & Forecasting

John C. ContiDirector

Office of Integrated Analysis & Forecasting

John C. ContiDirector

Immediate Office of theUnder Secretary for

Science

Avi GopsteinSenior Advisor

Immediate Office of theUnder Secretary for

Science

Avi GopsteinSenior Advisor

Office of Fossil Energy, Environmental Science

& Policy Analysis

Nancy L. JohnsonDirector

Office of Fossil Energy, Environmental Science

& Policy Analysis

Nancy L. JohnsonDirector

DOE Organization of Future Transportation Fuels Participants

06/032010 v.30

Key Milestones for NPC Resource and Fuels Studies

Resource Study Fuels Study

Review Proposed Study Plan - Executive Committee1 Meeting/Call (S-2/S-3) April 2010 Mid June 2010

Renew NPC Membership (S-1) May 2010

NPC Request/DOE Approval to Establish Study Committee2 with Proposed Committee Membership (NPC Chair/S-2). NPC Chair Appoints Committee Membership and Work Formally Commences.

May 2010 July 2010

Study Committee Review/Approval of Study Plan May/June 2010 (electronic) July 2010 (electronic)

CSC Updates to Executive Committee (S-2/S-3) July and Sept 2010 June and November 2010

Full NPC Meeting - Progress of Studies and Interactions with Study Leaders (e.g., possible Resources Study Committee Meeting and Joint Study Leadership Dinner on Preceding Day) (S-1, S-2/S-3)

September 2010

2-Study Integration and Outreach/Communication Ongoing Ongoing

Update on Initial Findings - Executive Committee Meeting/Call (S-2/S-3) November 2010 February 2011

Resource Study Committee Review/Approval of Draft Report (S-2/S-3) Janurary/February 2011

Resource Study Draft Report to NPC Membership (NPC) February 2011 (electronic)

Full NPC Meeting – Approval/Submittal of Final Resource Study Report by NPC, Update on Fuels Study, and Interactions with Study Leaders (e.g., possible Fuels Study Committee Meeting and Joint Study Leadership Dinner on Preceding Day) (S-1, S-2/S-3) March 2011

Fuels Study Committee Review/Approval of Draft Report (S-2/S-3) TBD

Fuels Study Draft Report to NPC Membership (NPC) TBD

Full NPC Meeting – Approval/Submittal of Final Fuels Study Report by NPC and Update on Resource Study Outreach (S-1, S-2/S-3) October 2011

Post Report Outreach and DOE Reply (NPC and DOE) April-May 2011 Nov-Dec 2011

06/032010 v.30

Reference Material From Resources Study

06/032010 v.30

Overlapping Areas – Per Resource Study Presentation

• Natural gas use as a transportation fuel will be examined in the transportation study. Natural gas transportation demand (direct and indirect use) will be incorporated into the resource study.

• Oil demand for the U.S. economy is predominately for transportation which will be covered in the transportation fuels study. The resource study will provide a high-level overview of oil demand for completeness.

• All conventional and unconventional North American natural gas and oil resources and production, including infrastructure needed to bring supply to the refinery or city-gate, will be addressed in the resource study.

*Source: “Resources Study – Draft Integration Plan April 19, 2010”

06/032010 v.30 *Source: “Resources Study – Draft Integration Plan April 19, 2010”