© williams mullen 2010 what to expect in government construction contracting february 23, 2010...
TRANSCRIPT
© Williams Mullen 2010
What to Expect in Government Construction Contracting
February 23, 2010February 23, 2010
Presented by:Presented by:
Robert E. KorrochRobert E. Korroch
Williams MullenWilliams Mullen
© Williams Mullen 2010
Part One:Primer on Government
Contracting
© Williams Mullen 2010
What is Different When the Owner is
the Government?
© Williams Mullen 2010.
4
Contracting with the sovereign– The requirement for competition– Socio-economic programs– The political factor
The government’s contracts are comprehensive– Federal Acquisition Regulations (“FAR”)– FAR provisions and clauses– Agency FAR supplements
© Williams Mullen 2010.
5
The government’s contracts contain unique requirements– Contractor duty to proceed during a dispute– Government’s unilateral right to terminate for its
convenience– Termination for default
The government is a powerful customer– Limited waivers of sovereign immunity– Numerous ways to “remedy” poor performance
© Williams Mullen 2010
Before You Bid
© Williams Mullen 2010.
7
Bid Should Take into Consideration Costs of Complying with Labor
Standards
Davis Bacon Act Copeland (Anti-Kickback) Act Contract Work Hours and Safety
Standards Act Collective Bargaining Agreements Equal Opportunity Regulations
© Williams Mullen 2010.
8
Be Prepared to Implement Compliance Programs
Written code of business ethics and conduct
Due diligence to prevent and detect criminal conduct and promote culture of compliance– Timely self-disclosure
© Williams Mullen 2010.
9
Compliance Programs
Business Ethics Awareness and Compliance Program– Training programs– Internal control system
Anti Kickback Act Gratuities Buy American
© Williams Mullen 2010
The Dilemma of Transparency—When to Self
Report
© Williams Mullen 2010.
11
More to do Before You Bid: CCR and ORCA Registration
Central contractor registration:– www.ccr.gov
Online representations and certifications application:– https://orca.bpn.gov
© Williams Mullen 2010.
12
Finding Opportunities
Focus Market research
– Customers in your region– Pre-solicitation and pre-bid conferences– Internet resources (e.g., www.fbo.gov)
© Williams Mullen 2010.
13
Study the Solicitation
Understand the evaluation factors that will be the basis for award
Understand the source selection criteria Evaluate the type of contract to
understand how risk of cost overruns is being shifted--Two ends of the spectrum:– Cost reimbursement contract: Government
(Owner) assumes the risk of cost overruns– Firm-Fixed Price contract: Contractor assumes
risk of cost overruns
© Williams Mullen 2010.
14
Risk Shifting
Myth: “I only bid firm-fixed price, so I don’t need a complicated accounting system.”
Truth: High likelihood of Government gaining access to cost data even under FFP– Requests for equitable adjustment under the
changes, suspension of work, and other clauses
– Claim for costs pursuant to a Termination for Convenience claim
© Williams Mullen 2010
Part Two:Hot Topics: Challenges that Arise from Teaming to Win Small Business Set-Aside Contracts
ACOE Update
© Williams Mullen 2010
Teaming For Small Business Set-Aside
Contracts
© Williams Mullen 2010.
17
The Teaming Push—Why?
Customer demands specialized technology, competencies, and highly skilled work force
Source selection criteria require depth of experience and past performance
Successful proposals are expensive to write
Not every bidder wins
© Williams Mullen 2010.
18
Small Business Set Aside Programs—The Other Reason for Teaming
Small business set-asides 8(a) Program HUBZone SBC SDVO SBC
© Williams Mullen 2010.
19
Size Standards: What is Small?
NAICS assigned to each procurement
Size standard based on either:
– Annual receipts: Total receipts over most recently completed three fiscal years divided by three; or
– Number of employees: Average number of employees for each of the pay periods for the preceding completed 12 calendar months.
© Williams Mullen 2010.
20
“Team Arrangement”
FAR uses the term “Team Arrangement” Generally describes two kinds of
relationships:– Joint Venture: Two or more companies form a
partnership or joint venture to act as potential prime contractor; or
– Teaming Agreement: A potential prime contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractors under a specified Government contract or acquisition program.
FAR 9.601
© Williams Mullen 2010.
21
FAR Policy
Government will recognize team arrangements; provided arrangements are identified and company relationships are fully disclosed in an offer.
FAR 9.603
© Williams Mullen 2010
Joint Venture
© Williams Mullen 2010.
23
Joint Ventures Rare for Small Business Set-Asides
A joint venture usually results in the creation of a new entity that would be considered to be large for SBA size purposes
Joint ventures for small business set-aside projects are not advisable except when they fall under special rules, e.g.– 8(a) Mentor and Protégé– JV among specially qualified small businesses
for an acquisition that exceeds one-half of the size standard
© Williams Mullen 2010
Teaming Agreement Overview
© Williams Mullen 2010.
25
Key Components of a Teaming Agreement
Identify the solicitation (the “program”) Specify each party’s responsibilities in
proposal preparation Exclusivity Process for entering into a subcontract Terms of the subcontract
– Agreed division of the statement of work– Subcontract pricing
© Williams Mullen 2010
Why All of This Detail in a Teaming Agreement?
© Williams Mullen 2010.
27
The Evil That Lurks inTeaming Arrangements: Affiliation
In determining the concern's size, SBA counts the receipts, employees, or other measure of size of the concern whose size is at issue and all of its domestic and foreign affiliates, regardless of whether the affiliates are organized for profit.
© Williams Mullen 2010.
28
Affiliation Scenario
Procurement is total small business set- aside– Small business prime teams with large
business sub
Size status is protested/award is lost Bidder accused of false certification or
submitting false claims
© Williams Mullen 2010.
29
Affiliation Definition
Concerns and entities are affiliates of each other when one controls or has the power to control the other, or a third party or parties controls or has the power to control both. It does not matter whether control is exercised, so long as the power to control exists.
© Williams Mullen 2010.
30
Bases for Affiliation
SBA will consider the totality of the circumstances.
SBA may find affiliation even though no single factor is sufficient to constitute affiliation.
© Williams Mullen 2010.
31
Bases for Affiliation
Ownership of stock or options Common management Identity of interest Newly organized concern rule Joint ventures
© Williams Mullen 2010.
32
Ostensible Subcontractor
A contractor and its ostensible subcontractor are treated as joint venturers, and therefore affiliates, for size determination purposes.
An ostensible subcontractor is a subcontractor that performs primary and vital requirements of a contract, or a subcontractor upon which the prime contractor is unusually reliant.
© Williams Mullen 2010.
33
Ostensible Subcontractor
Prime contractor unusually reliant on subcontractor– Bonding assistance (construction)– Cooperation in writing the proposal– Prime planning to use sub’s facilities– Cooperation in performing the work
© Williams Mullen 2010.
34
Ostensible Subcontractor
Subcontractor performing primary and vital requirements– Sharing of key employees– Prime planning to hire sub’s employees– Technical assistance– Contract management– Percentage of work
© Williams Mullen 2010.
35
Ostensible Subcontractor
SBA is particularly suspicious when the subcontractor is the incumbent contractor and is ineligible to submit a proposal because it exceeds the applicable size standard for that solicitation.
© Williams Mullen 2010.
36
Minimum Percentage of Work Requirements
For set-aside service contract, small business concern must perform at least 50 percent of the cost of the contract incurred for personnel with its own employees;
In the case of a contract for general construction, the concern will perform at least 15 percent of the cost of the contract with its own employees (not including the costs of materials). [50% for HUBZone]
© Williams Mullen 2010.
37
The Size Status Protest
Procedure Outcomes Awardee’s disadvantage:
– The first team to have its award protested loses
Collateral consequences:– False Statement: Knowingly and intentionally
certifying a large business as small.– False Claim: Certifying that a business is small
to obtain a benefit from the Government.
© Williams Mullen 2010.
38
Avoid the Pitfalls
Small business primes: Think twice about teaming with the large business incumbent.
Large business: Be willing to relinquish control to the small business prime.
Use Teaming Agreements, but show in the Agreement that the small business prime is running the show.
© Williams Mullen 2010.
39
Avoid the Pitfalls
In the Proposal: Discuss the Teaming Agreement and the small business prime contractor’s independence.
Be prepared to defend against a size status protest if you win (goes back to performing due diligence in choosing your teaming partner).
© Williams Mullen 2010
Three More Hot Topics
© Williams Mullen 2010.
41
New FAR Requirements
E-Verify– FAR 52.222-54
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Reporting Requirements– FAR 52.204-11
Project Labor Agreements– Executive Order 13502– Final FAR Rule Pending
© Williams Mullen 2010
Robert E. “Bob” KorrochRobert E. “Bob” KorrochNewport News, VA
757.249.5100
North Carolina Virginia Washington, D.C. London, England
www.williamsmullen.com
Contact Information