1. : ? , . . 3 2014 2. The Mirror of Time Tom Husseys Time Machine 2010 MAX. MIN. 3. , , ? , , ? ? ? , ? ? ? ? ? 4. : 100% 20% 5. I remember what I am I am what I remember 6. Singer, Salovey, 1993; Singer, Blagov, 2008. - , - 7. .., .. ? - ? 8. 9. 23.2 25.3 24.7 26 17.2 24.4 24 25.8 10 15 20 25 4 P=0.000 (TMAS) 10. 4 2,75 1,63 2,71 2,68 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 , "" " " 11. - --- --- --- 12. Janssen, S. M. J., Rubin, D. C., & St. Jacques, P. L. (2011). The temporal distribution of autobiographical memory: Changes in reliving and vividness over the lifespan do not explain the reminiscence bump. Memory & Cognition, 39, 1-11. 13. - Wh- ; ; , ; ; , , .. 2012 Fivush R.,1997, 1999, 2004, 2006, 2011 14. , , (, , , ). - , . - , , 2009; , 2010, , 2014 15. 100 82 37 64 0 20 40 60 80 100 > 31 (6,3 (1,6)) - (31,2 (7,2)). 2 6-11 1 () 2 () % 16. (5.2 ), (36 ). . : , ? : : : : -, ? : , : ? : : ? : : , ? ? : , , : , ? : : ? : : , ? : : , ! ? : : ? : , , : ? : : , , , . ? - ? : . 17. (, 1980) ( ) - - 18. - - ( ?) ( ) Q.Wang 19. - 3.3 4.5 4 ? ? 10/5 5/5 7/5 20. - ? ? ???? 21. , , , , . , , ??? 22. (10 ) (6 ) 2 . (9 ) 23. .. ? ? 24. , , David Rubin Dorothe Bertsen 25. Rubin, Bertsen, 2004 ; , , , 2005 , , , , , . . , , ? ( 1 100%). 7- . 26. % Age at event Emotion ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sum M M M SD M 93 79.91 6.70 28.08 2.45 2.58 77 81.27 6.17 26.90 3.11 2.52 68 99.34 5.69 6.13 0.42 1.24 56 84.20 5.67 22.05 3.86 1.30 1 52 94.80 6.06 16.33 5.26 2.44 32 97.81 6.41 34.35 17.32 -2.56 31 89.97 5.55 65.10 2.36 -0.06 . 26 98.50 6.12 19.42 0.95 1.12 24 97.04 6.29 49.09 11.51 -2.46 22 90.36 5.41 25.64 3.06 1.00 17 91.88 5.00 2.82 1.67 0.29 12 60.42 5.92 39.45 8.65 -2.00 / 12 66.67 5.75 3.42 0.90 0.58 11 98.64 6.64 4.78 2.22 2.91 11 95.73 6.36 8.56 4.36 1.18 11 99.55 6.36 13.18 1.17 -0.18 11 71.64 5.91 54.22 5.04 2.73 ___________________________________________________________________ __________ 27. % Age at event Emotion ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sum M M M SD M 10 67.50 5.20 21.33 2.45 1.30 9 98.89 6.67 1.33 0.50 2.11 9 69.89 6.67 50.63 17.20 -1.33 8 75.63 5.38 25.63 7.82 2.00 7 77.00 5.29 26.67 2.58 0.71 7 98.43 5.71 16.00 1.41 1.50 6 69.50 6.80 75.00 4.47 -3.00 6 98.67 7.00 2.20 0.45 2.17 Confirmation 6 75.00 4.33 13.67 0.52 2.33 Enter adulthood 6 94.00 6.67 19.40 6.39 1.17 Having peers 5 72.00 6.60 14.20 2.39 2.60 Empty nest 4 84.25 5.50 46.25 2.50 -0.75 First rejection 4 97.25 6.50 7.50 7.78 -3.00 4 81.25 6.75 30.00 0.00 3.00 First contact 4 96.25 6.75 1.00 1.15 1.50 4 77.50 4.75 0.00 0.00 1.50 4 95.00 5.75 16.25 4.79 0.75 40 87.47 5.97 20.56 18.96 0.75 ___________________________________________________________________ __________ 28. 29 52 54 82 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 life script events in life story M=10 M=13 M=15 M=41 % (Nourkova, 2009; Bohn, Bertsen, 2011) 29. % % 28 90% 25 53% 27 75% 23 63% 6 66% 7 75% 22 54% 17 61% 16.3 50% 13 35% 34 31% ---- ----- 65 30% ----- ------ 19.5 25% ----- ----- 49 23% ----- ------ 25.5 21% 20 36% ----- ------ 3.5 20% ----- ------ 16.7 17% 30. n=102; n=102 : : : 31. 1. . , , . 32. 33. , , - : ; ; *; *; . : ; ; , ; , . , , : *; , *. , . .. // . 2014 34. How you lie affects what you remember Kathleen M. Vieira, Sean M. Lane Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 2 (2013) 173178 N=24 1. 24 35. 3 1. 2. ( +) ( +) ( -) ( -) 36. % (/) 37. ( ) ? ( ) , , ! 38. ? ( 2 ) , ? , "-", ? ( 2 ) , , , . : 2014 N=50 2013 , 39. % (1 ) (/) 72 68 66 74 74 58 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 40. % (1 ) (/) 4 10 16 8 8 20 0 5 10 15 20 25