© 2010 institute of nuclear power operations hprct 2010 site human performance event-free day reset...
TRANSCRIPT
© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010
SITE HUMAN PERFORMANCE EVENT-FREE DAY RESET CRITERIA
SITE HUMAN PERFORMANCE EVENT-FREE DAY RESET CRITERIA
Tom Kriesel
INPO
Tom Kriesel
INPO
© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010
Historical ReviewHistorical Review
© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010
Historical ReviewHistorical Review
• First Quarter 2009, plants started reporting data in Consolidated Data Entry (CDE) system• Monthly number of “Human Performance
Errors”
• Quartile ratings calculated by INPO based on monthly and quarterly data
• Industry data found under “Additional INPO Indicator Results” on Plant Information Center homepage
• First Quarter 2009, plants started reporting data in Consolidated Data Entry (CDE) system• Monthly number of “Human Performance
Errors”
• Quartile ratings calculated by INPO based on monthly and quarterly data
• Industry data found under “Additional INPO Indicator Results” on Plant Information Center homepage
© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010
Human Performance Event Performance IndicatorsHuman Performance Event Performance Indicators
© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010
Human Performance Event Performance IndicatorsHuman Performance Event Performance Indicators
© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010
Human Performance Event Performance IndicatorsHuman Performance Event Performance Indicators
© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010
Challenges with reported data in 2009Challenges with reported data in 2009
• Some stations reporting “errors” not meeting significance criteria in INPO 08-004 and CDE Data Element Manual, INPO 04-004• Not being detected and corrected by HU leads
• Action needed by HU leads• Know who is updating CDE for your site
• Ensure they are using correct site indicator for input data
• Validate correct data entered
• Some stations reporting “errors” not meeting significance criteria in INPO 08-004 and CDE Data Element Manual, INPO 04-004• Not being detected and corrected by HU leads
• Action needed by HU leads• Know who is updating CDE for your site
• Ensure they are using correct site indicator for input data
• Validate correct data entered
© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010
Challenges with reported data in 2009Challenges with reported data in 2009
• Again – only report data meeting the significance criteria for a station event (site clock reset) as defined in 08-004
• Why not change indicator title to “event” instead of “error”• “Event” term already used by INPO for analysis of
industry submitted operation experience reports
• Still being evaluated by analysis group at INPO
• Again – only report data meeting the significance criteria for a station event (site clock reset) as defined in 08-004
• Why not change indicator title to “event” instead of “error”• “Event” term already used by INPO for analysis of
industry submitted operation experience reports
• Still being evaluated by analysis group at INPO
© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010
Human Performance Event Performance IndicatorsHuman Performance Event Performance Indicators
• There is other “Human Performance Events” data in the Plant Information Center (PIC) • Not the same as the new 08-004 indicator
• Stations report number quarterly
• Determined by INPO Analysis Group review of submitted Operation Experience reports
• INPO Analysis Group tags Human Performance as applicable during analysis of submitted Operation Experience reports
• There is other “Human Performance Events” data in the Plant Information Center (PIC) • Not the same as the new 08-004 indicator
• Stations report number quarterly
• Determined by INPO Analysis Group review of submitted Operation Experience reports
• INPO Analysis Group tags Human Performance as applicable during analysis of submitted Operation Experience reports
© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010
What’s next?What’s next?• 18 months of industry data will be available
end of second quarter 2010; then• Calculation will start using rolling 18 months
(aligned with 08-004)
• Indicator will move into Plant Information Center (PIC)
• Targeted for implementation after 2010 second quarter
• Quartile values calculated using 18 month rolling data
• 18 months of industry data will be available end of second quarter 2010; then• Calculation will start using rolling 18 months
(aligned with 08-004)
• Indicator will move into Plant Information Center (PIC)
• Targeted for implementation after 2010 second quarter
• Quartile values calculated using 18 month rolling data
© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010
What’s next?What’s next?• Industry team worked hard to establish
station event criteria in 08-004, but based on roll-out experience it is time to revisit the criteria.
• Industry team worked hard to establish station event criteria in 08-004, but based on roll-out experience it is time to revisit the criteria.
© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010
SITE HUMAN PERFORMANCE EVENT-FREE DAY RESET CRITERIA
SITE HUMAN PERFORMANCE EVENT-FREE DAY RESET CRITERIA Definition of a Site Human Performance Event-Free Day (EFD)
Reset – When an event, as described in the table below, occurs
as a result of either of the following:
• an initiating action (error) by an individual or group of individuals (Re)
(event resulting from an active error)
• an initiating action (not an error) by an individual or group of
individuals during an activity conducted as planned (Md) (event
resulting from a flawed defense or latent organizational
weakness created within the last 18 months)
Definition of a Site Human Performance Event-Free Day (EFD)
Reset – When an event, as described in the table below, occurs
as a result of either of the following:
• an initiating action (error) by an individual or group of individuals (Re)
(event resulting from an active error)
• an initiating action (not an error) by an individual or group of
individuals during an activity conducted as planned (Md) (event
resulting from a flawed defense or latent organizational
weakness created within the last 18 months)