© 2006 tda development remodelling the school workforce: an english perspective pat collarbone...
TRANSCRIPT
© 2006 TDA Development
Remodelling the School Workforce: an English perspective
Pat Collarbone
Futures Thinking for Education Conference, OECD
Hiroshima University, November 6th and 7th 2006
© 2006 TDA Development
3
The cultural shift
Short term
Reaction
Compliance
Autocratic
Competition
Independence
Stress
Universal learning
Long term
Initiative
Creativity
Distributed
Collaborative
Inter-dependence
Fulfilment
Personalised learning
The system is moving toward a new order of school that is networked, collaborative and with leadership shared within and between schools and other agencies.
© 2006 TDA Development
4
The national context
NationalPrescription
Schools leading reform
Dependency
2020
• Leading and managing change• Breaking down barriers• Maximising capacity• Increasing capability
The 1990s Now
Inter-dependency
© 2006 TDA Development
5
Healthy schools
Performance development
Building schools of the future
Extended schools
Remodelling the workforcePersonalised learning
Emerging technologies for learning
Inclusion
Multi-agency teamworking
Collaboration
The School
National priorities
Key focus: raising standards and securing life chances
© 2006 TDA Development
6
School workforce
FTE maintained school workforce in England, 1997-2006
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Th
ou
san
ds
Teachers Teaching assistants
Administrative staff Technicians
Other
Source: Annual Survey of Workforce Numbers, Annual School Census
© 2006 TDA Development
8
What we know from research: start early
Source: Feinstein, Economica (2003)
High SES; low early rank
Low SES;low early rank
High SES;high early rank
Low SES; high early rank
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
22 28 34 40 46 52 58 64 70 76 82 88 94 100 106 112 118
Age in months
Average p
ositio
n in the d
istr
ibution
© 2006 TDA Development
9
Attainment (GCSE) and levels of deprivation (2006)
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
9 34 17 4 69 33 13 47 18 48 NA 77 106 73 148 105 147 121 67 142 124
Secondary FSM rank (/148)
Pe
rce
nta
ge
5+ A*-Cinc E+M
FSM
Natio
nal A
verage
© 2006 TDA Development
10
Raising standards and making a difference to the life chances of every child
Extendedservicesin and aroundschools
ECMChildren’s services
Healthservices
Private and vol.
orgsYouthjustice
Youthservices
The Children
Act2004
© 2006 TDA Development
11
The agenda
The current context
The standards agenda
Remodelling
The future
© 2006 TDA Development
12
Remodelling offers a platform for developing school processes …
… by creating capacity and capability to
extend community resources
promote teamwork in schools
enhance professionalism
leverage and build on existing networks
collaborate beyond school boundaries
personalise the offer and improve pupil outcomes
lead reform
develop social partnerships
use independent change agents
increase capacity for future change
© 2006 TDA Development
13
System-wide change requires a significant investment to build relationships and connections
“Whole Child” responsibility
– all agencies
Information sharing across
agencies
Common Assessment Framework
Integrated inspection of
Children’s Services
Local Safeguarding
Children’s Board
Local Strategic
Partnership
Connexions
Children’s Trust
Police and Youth
Justice
Multi-disciplinary
project teams
Children’s Centres
Healtheg Primary Care Trust
Parent Groups
Faith Groups
Business Partnerships
Sports/Arts Groups
Voluntary Organisations
Other Schools
Social Services
Local Authority
Pupil Representation
Children
Schools
Statutory Duty for multi-agency
co-operation
Specified accountability
eg “Lead Professional”
© 2006 TDA Development
14
During the change process we experience the emotional curve . . .
+ve
-ve
Surprise – “Gosh this remodelling stuff is really interesting.”
Em
otio
na
l Sta
te
Discover Deepen Develop Deliver Sustain
Frustration – “There’s so much to do - I don’t know where to start!”
Despair – “I can’t see a clear way forward with this”
Optimism, enthusiasm – “Hey this remodelling stuff is actually working!”
Hope, exploration – “Now it’s all beginning to make sense.”
Commitment – “This is the way it’s got to be.”
Mobilise
© 2006 TDA Development
15
When change doesn’t work – it’s rarely for rational reasons
rational political
emotional
2+2 = 4
Uncertainty?
relieffear
anger
confidenceexcitement
sadness
© 2006 TDA Development
16
Leading change
building
trust
redesigning
jobs
changing
organisational
structures
developing
learning
cultures
Take
risks
Share
leadership
Inspire
others
Coach
others
© 2006 TDA Development
17
Take hold of the future
• Prepare for the unexpected
• Acquire faster reaction times
• Identify teams and partners
• Implement flatter structures
• Recognise the global village
• Develop cultural sensitivity
• Invest in technology
• Create “family”
• Instil purpose and meaning
• Recognise that leadership will be everything
Adapted from Dixon, 2002
© 2006 TDA Development
18
The agenda
The current context
The standards agenda
Remodelling
The future
© 2006 TDA Development
19
International perspectives on workforce remodelling
Transformed
Reforming
Repairing
Static
Pulled by schools Pushed on schools
‘Reform ceiling’
UK
USA*
Australia*
Norway
Germany*
Japan
HayGroup, 2005
* Federal system
© 2006 TDA Development
20
HayGroup conclusions
• workforce modernisation is a potentially powerful lever for raising standards
• developing staff skills, managing performance and targeting scarce expertise can improve the quality of teaching and learning
• these reforms can improve morale and equity within the profession itself
BUT
• no government can change the workforce unless it believes, and the workforce itself believes, that it is something which can be changed
• to manage workforce reform successfully we also need to manage performance and progression among the multitude of new careers and roles that come into existence
HayGroup, 2005
© 2006 TDA Development
21
2020: What this might mean for learning in schools …
Greater use of multiple information sources; multi-layered use of
human reference points
There will be more family learning taking place
Older young people are more likely to be less subject focused
There will be a greater use of ongoing learning profiles and
assessment for learning
6
7
8
9Learners will include the staff of the schools
Greater differentiation of content, delivery style and pace
Schools will also have provision for adult learners
2
3
Pupils and their parents will be more directly involved in the design
and delivery of the curriculum
4
1
Teachers will continue to lead educational input
There will be more flexibility with regard to attendance and learning
methodologies
5 10
© 2006 TDA Development
22
2020: What this might mean for schools …
Schools will work as global villages with networks operating worldwide
Schools will have higher adult / pupil ratios than currently exist
Specialist subject teaching will be common from age 8 to 14
Many school sites will be centres of multi-agency working
6
7
8
9Schools will operate more openly within formal collaborative networks
Most will offer a 24/7/365 service for learners
Many will operate a 2 shift system with a range of staff available
2
3
Schools will be community learning centres
4
1
There is likely to be greater private / community investment in schooling
Principals/headteachers may no longer run schools
5 10
© 2006 TDA Development
23
2020: Need to know, understand and be able to do …
Entry qualifications to the profession will be more rigorous
than they currently are
Teachers will be required to demonstrate high levels of
emotional intelligence particularly if they teach the 3 to 14 age groups
Teachers will specialise in the pedagogy and brain development of differentiated age groups – e.g. 3 to
8, 8 to 14, 14 to adulthood
Teachers will have a better understanding of pedagogy,
learning styles and brain development
Performance development will be a key part of ongoing professionalism
Teachers will lead and manage teams of assistants
© 2006 TDA Development
24
The future is not a result of choices among alternative paths offered by the present, but a place that is created--created first in the mind and will, created next in activity.
The future is not some place we are going to, but one we are creating. The paths are not to be found, but made, and the activity of making them, changes both the maker and the destination.
John Schaar