zeolite molecular sieve 4Å: a reusable catalyst for fast and efficient conversion of epoxides to...
TRANSCRIPT
This article was downloaded by: [Umeå University Library]On: 08 October 2013, At: 09:04Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registeredoffice: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Phosphorus, Sulfur, and Silicon and theRelated ElementsPublication details, including instructions for authors andsubscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/gpss20
Zeolite Molecular Sieve 4Å: A ReusableCatalyst for Fast and Efficient Conversionof Epoxides to Thiiranes with ThioureaRonak Eisavi a , Behzad Zeynizadeh a & Mohammad Mehdi Baradarania
a Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science , Urmia University ,Urmia, Iran
To cite this article: Ronak Eisavi , Behzad Zeynizadeh & Mohammad Mehdi Baradarani (2011) ZeoliteMolecular Sieve 4Å: A Reusable Catalyst for Fast and Efficient Conversion of Epoxides to Thiiraneswith Thiourea, Phosphorus, Sulfur, and Silicon and the Related Elements, 186:9, 1902-1909, DOI:10.1080/10426507.2010.550267
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10426507.2010.550267
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the“Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as tothe accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinionsand views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Contentshould not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sourcesof information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever orhowsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arisingout of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Anysubstantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms &Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Phosphorus, Sulfur, and Silicon, 186:1902–1909, 2011Copyright C© Taylor & Francis Group, LLCISSN: 1042-6507 print / 1563-5325 onlineDOI: 10.1080/10426507.2010.550267
ZEOLITE MOLECULAR SIEVE 4A: A REUSABLE CATALYSTFOR FAST AND EFFICIENT CONVERSION OF EPOXIDESTO THIIRANES WITH THIOUREA
Ronak Eisavi, Behzad Zeynizadeh,and Mohammad Mehdi BaradaraniDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
Abstract Various epoxides are readily converted to their corresponding thiiranes bythiourea/zeolite molecular sieve 4Å system in refluxing MeOH. All reactions were carried outwithin 12–25 min to give thiiranes in 80%–99% yields. The catalyst saves its catalytic activityfor several times at this transformation. Stereospecific conversion of (R)-(+)-styrene oxide to(S)-(+)-styrene episulfide was achieved by this combination system.
Keywords Epoxide; thiirane; thiourea; stereospecific; zeolite molecular sieve 4Å
INTRODUCTION
Thiiranes (episulfides) are the simplest sulfur heterocycles and occur in nature,mostly in the plants.1 These three-member heterocyclic compounds have found wideapplication in pharmaceutical, pesticide, herbicide, and polymer industries.2 Moreover,they played a pivotal role as versatile building blocks in asymmetric synthesis.3 A lit-erature review shows that thiiranes are prepared by various methods; however, the moststraightforward synthesis is the conversion of epoxides to thiiranes by an oxygen–sulfurexchange reaction. This protocol has been achieved frequently by a combination of sul-fur transfer agents with Lewis acids, inorganic/organic solid supports, and other promot-ers. Thiourea,4 dimethylthioforamide,5 inorganic thiocyanates,6 polymer-supported thio-cyanates,7 and silica-supported KSCN8 or (NH2)2CS9 are the reagents that have beenused for the conversion of epoxides to thiiranes. The combination systems of differ-ent Lewis acids or reagents such as RuCl3,10 InBr3,11 BiCl3,12 Bi(TFA)3,13 Bi(OTf)3,13
TiO2,14 TiO(TFA)2,15 TiCl3(OTf),15 Mg(HSO4)2,16 Al(DS)3·3H2O,17 SbCl3,18 LiBF4,19
Received 20 December 2010; accepted 19 January 2011.The financial support of this work was gratefully acknowledged by the Research Council of Urmia University.Address correspondence to Behzad Zeynizadeh, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Urmia
University, Urmia, Iran. E-mail: [email protected]
1902
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Um
eå U
nive
rsity
Lib
rary
] at
09:
04 0
8 O
ctob
er 2
013
ZEOLITE MOLECULAR SIEVE 4Å 1903
LiClO4,20 SiO2-HBF4,21 I2,22 oxalic acid,23 montmorillonite K-10,24 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine,25 (NH4)8[CeW10O36].20H2O,26 CAN,27 Sn(TTP)(OTf)2,28 Sn(TT P)(BF4)2,29
[bmim]PF6,30 β-cyclodextrin,31 poly(4-vinylpyridine)-supported Ce(OTf)4,32 polystyrene-supported AlCl3,33 polymeric cosolvents,34 etidronic acid,35 and microwave irradiation36
with thiourea or NH4SCN have also been reported for this transformation. Moreover,solvent-free conversion of epoxides to thiiranes was achieved recently by thiourea/NH4Cl37
and Dowex-50WX8-supported thiourea38 systems.Although a vast variety of reagents or methods have been reported for the preparation
of thiiranes from epoxides, however, most of these protocols suffer from some disadvan-tages. Therefore, the development and introduction of convenient methods that use cheap,reusable, and commercially available reagents is practically concerned and it is still indemand. So, we wish to introduce thiourea/zeolite molecular sieve (ZMS) 4Å system asan efficient and eco-friendly protocol for conversion of structurally different epoxides tothiiranes in refluxing MeOH (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
ZMSs are crystalline and highly porous materials that belong to the class of hydratedaluminosilicates.39 These micropores are of molecular sizes and give zeolites, adsorp-tion, catalytic,40 and ion exchange properties41 of paramount importance in the chem-ical industries. Moreover, interest is growing on the study of new zeolite applicationsrelated to process intensification,42 green chemistry,43 hybrid materials,44 medicine,45 ani-mal food uses,46 optical- and electrical-based applications,47 multifunctional fabrics,48 andnanotechnology.49
Thiourea has been one of the most widely used sulfurating agents for the conversionof epoxides to thiiranes; however, low reactivity, extended reaction times, low yield ofproducts, and, in some cases, desulfuration of the resulting thiiranes to olefins50 are themajor disadvantages of using thiourea as a sulfurating agent. Along the outlined strategies,a literature review shows that transformation of epoxides to thiiranes with thiourea in thepresence of ZMS 4Å has not been investigated yet. Therefore, in the course of our studies ingreen protocols for the preparation of thiiranes from epoxides37,38 and in order to evaluatethe influence of ZMS 4Å on this transformation, we decided to study the capability ofthiourea/ZMS 4Å system for the conversion of epoxides to thirranes.
The optimization experiments showed that the reaction of styrene oxide (1 mmol)with thiourea (2 mmol) in the presence of ZMS 4Å (0.1 g) was carried out successfully inrefluxing MeOH. The epoxide was converted to the corresponding thiirane in 98% yieldwithin 15 min. The effect of other solvents such as CH3CN, THF, acetone, n-hexane,and EtOH was also investigated for the typical experiment. The results showed that therate enhancement and yield of styrene episulfide in MeOH were higher than the othersolvents (Table 1). It is notable that in the absence of the molecular sieve, thiourea was
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Um
eå U
nive
rsity
Lib
rary
] at
09:
04 0
8 O
ctob
er 2
013
1904 R. EISAVI ET AL.
Table 1 Optimization of reaction conditions for conversion of styrene oxide to styrene episulfide withthiourea/zeolite molecular sieve 4Å (ZMS-4) systema
Reaction component molar ratio ZMS-4 (g) Solvent Condition Time (h) Conversion (%)b
Epoxide/thiourea (1:2) 0.1 n-hexane Reflux 240 50Epoxide/thiourea (1:2) 0.1 Acetone Reflux 300 55Epoxide/thiourea (1:2) 0.1 CH3CN Reflux 180 75Epoxide/thiourea (1:2) 0.1 THF Reflux 180 70Epoxide/thiourea (1:2) 0.1 EtOH Reflux 30 90Epoxide/thiourea (1:2) 0.05 MeOH Reflux 30 100Epoxide/thiourea (1:2) 0.1 MeOH Reflux 15 100Epoxide/thiourea (1:2) 0.1 MeOH r.t. 45 100Epoxide/thiourea (1:2) 0.2 MeOH Reflux 10 100Epoxide/thiourea (1:2) – MeOH Reflux 90 80
aAll reactions were carried out with 1 mmol of styrene oxide. bConversions less than 100% were determinedon the basis of recovered epoxide.
less efficient in the conversion of styrene oxide to styrene episulfide in refluxing MeOH(Table 1). The capability of this synthetic protocol was further investigated by the reactionof activated, deactivated, and cyclic epoxides with thiourea/ZMS 4Å system under theoptimized conditions. Table 2 shows the general trend and versatility of this syntheticmethod. As seen, all reactions were carried out successfully within 12–25 min to givethiiranes in 80%–99% yields. Moreover, the stereochemistry of this synthetic method wasstudied by the reaction of optically pure (R)-(+)-styrene oxide with thiourea/ZMS 4Åsystem at room temperature. (S)-(+)-Styrene episulfide was obtained in 95% yield and90% optical purity. The optical purity of the product was measured by comparing theobtained specific rotation ([α]25
D = +39.5 ◦, n-heptane) with the reported rotation ([α]25D =
−15.7◦, n-heptane, 35.8% ee) for (R)-(−)-styrene episulfide51 (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2
The green aspect of this synthetic method was studied by recovery of molecular sieve4Å from the reaction mixture and then reusing it for the conversion of styrene oxide tostyrene episulfide. The results showed that the regenerated molecular sieve saves its catalyticactivity for several times in the titled conversion. In addition, the efficiency of thiourea/ZMS4Å was highlighted by comparing some of our results with those of achieved by thiourea/120◦C,4 thiourea/SiO2,9 thiourea/NH4Cl,37 and thiourea/Dowex-50WX838 systems (Table 3).A case study shows that the present protocol is more efficient than the reported methods.
In summary, we have shown that structurally different epoxides are easily and effi-ciently converted to their corresponding thiiranes with thiourea/ZMS 4Å system in refluxingMeOH. Stereospecific conversion of (R)-(+)-styrene oxide to (S)-(+)-styrene episulfidewas achieved perfectly by this combination system. So, we think that the cheapness andreusability of molecular sieve 4Å, short reaction times, and high yields of the productsafford this synthetic method as a green and useful addition to the present methodologies.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Um
eå U
nive
rsity
Lib
rary
] at
09:
04 0
8 O
ctob
er 2
013
ZEOLITE MOLECULAR SIEVE 4Å 1905
Table 2 Conversion of epoxides to thiiranes with thiourea/zeolite molecular sieve 4Å systema
Molar ratioepoxide/ Time Yield
Epoxide Thiirane thiourea (min) (%)b Ref.
1:2 15 98 37
1:2 17 95 35
1:2 13 96 35
1:2 15 92 37
1:2 12 81 35
1:2 25 94 37
1:2 18 95 37
1:2 17 99 37
1:2 18 99 37
1:2 20 96 30
1:2 15 98 30
1:2 15 98 30
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Um
eå U
nive
rsity
Lib
rary
] at
09:
04 0
8 O
ctob
er 2
013
1906 R. EISAVI ET AL.
Table 2 Conversion of epoxides to thiiranes with thiourea/zeolite molecular sieve 4Å systema (Contonued)
Molar ratioepoxide/ Time Yield
Epoxide Thiirane thiourea (min) (%)b Ref.
1:2 20 97 37
1:2 15 97 37
1:2 15 95 37
1:2 16 93 30
1:2 25 80 30
1:2 16 92 30
aAll reactions were carried out in the presence of ZMS 4Å (0.1 g, per 1 mmol of epoxide) in refluxing MeOH.bIsolated yields.
EXPERIMENTAL
General
All reagents and substrates were purchased from commercial sources with the bestquality and were used without further purification. IR and 1H/13C NMR spectra wererecorded on Thermo Nicolet Nexus 670 FT-IR and 300 MHz Bruker Avance spectrometers,respectively. The products were characterized by their spectra data and comparison withthe reported data in literature. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was applied for thepurity determination of substrates, products, and reaction monitoring over silica gel 60 F254
aluminium sheet.
Conversion of Epoxides to Thiiranes with Thiourea/ZMS 4A System:
General Procedure
In a round-bottomed flask (10 mL) equipped with a magnetic stirrer and condenser,a solution of the epoxide (1 mmol) and thiourea (0.152 g, 2 mmol) in MeOH (3 mL)was prepared. Molecular sieve 4Å (0.1 g) was then added to the resulting solution andthe reaction mixture was stirred magnetically under reflux condition for 12–25 min. Theprogress of the reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion of the reaction, MeOHwas evaporated and diethyl ether (5 mL) was added to the reaction mixture followed bystirring for 5 min. The mixture was filtered and the organic solvent was evaporated to give
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Um
eå U
nive
rsity
Lib
rary
] at
09:
04 0
8 O
ctob
er 2
013
Tabl
e3
Com
pari
son
ofco
nver
sion
ofep
oxid
esto
thiir
anes
with
thio
urea
unde
rdi
ffer
entc
ondi
tions
a
Thi
oure
a/Z
MS-
4bT
hiou
rea/
120
◦ C4
Thi
oure
a/Si
O2
9T
hiou
rea/
NH
4C
l37T
hiou
rea/
Dow
ex-5
0WX
838
Thi
oure
aZ
MS
Tim
eY
ield
Thi
oure
aT
ime
Yie
ldT
hiou
rea
Silic
aT
ime
Yie
ldT
hiou
rea
NH
4C
lT
ime
Yie
ldT
hiou
rea
Dow
exT
ime
Yie
ldE
poxi
de(m
mol
)(g
)(m
in)
(%)
(mm
ol)
(min
)(%
)(m
mol
)(g
)(m
in)
(%)
(mm
ol)
(g)
(min
)(%
)(m
mol
)(g
)(m
in)
(%)
20.
115
982
1565
22.
880
952
0.5
3095
20.
560
93
20.
118
992
1584
22.
812
095
20.
575
942
0.5
2091
20.
115
972
6077
22.
840
922
0.5
1593
20.
530
96
20.
120
972
6080
22.
845
932
0.5
3096
20.
520
95
20.
115
922
2592
22.
819
092
20.
540
652
0.5
6085
a All
reac
tions
wer
eca
rrie
dou
twith
1m
mol
ofth
eep
oxid
eun
der
the
defin
edco
nditi
ons.
b Pres
entm
etho
d.
1907
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Um
eå U
nive
rsity
Lib
rary
] at
09:
04 0
8 O
ctob
er 2
013
1908 R. EISAVI ET AL.
crude thiirane for further purification by a short-column chromatography over silica gel(80%–99% yield) (Table 2).
REFERENCES
1. T. L. Peppard, F. R. Sharpe, and J. A. Elvidge, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans., 1, 311–313 (1980).2. D. C. Dittmer, In Thiiranes and Thiirenes in Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry, A. R.
Katritzky and C. W. Rees, Eds. (Pergamon, Oxford, 1984), Vol 7, pp. 132–182.3. A. Bellomo and D. Gonzalez, Tetrahedron Lett., 48, 3047–3051 (2007).4. A. R. Kiasat, F. Kazemi, and M. F. Mehrjardi, Phosphorus, Sulfur, Silicon Relat. Elem., 179,
1841–1844 (2004).5. T. Takido, Y. Kobayashi, and K. Itabashi, Synthesis, 779–780 (1986).6. (a) H. Bouda, M. E. Borredon, M. Delmas, and A. Gaset, Synth. Commun., 17, 943–951 (1987);
(b) E. Vedejs and G. A. Krafft, Tetrahedron, 38, 2857–2881 (1982); (c) K. Jankowski and R.Harvey, Synthesis, 627–628 (1972); (d) M. Sander, Chem. Rev., 66, 297–339 (1966).
7. B. Tamami and A. R. Kiasat, Synth. Commun., 26, 3953–3958 (1996).8. M. O. Brimeyer, A. Mehrota, S. Quici, A. Nigam, and S. L. Regen, J. Org. Chem., 45, 4254–4255
(1980).9. N. Iranpoor, H. Firouzabadi, and A. A. Jafari, Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem., 180,
1809–1814 (2005).10. N. Iranpoor and F. Kazemi, Tetrahedron, 53, 11377–11382 (1997).11. J. S. Yadav, B. V. S. Reddy, and G. Baishya, Synlett, 396–398 (2003).12. I. Mohammadpoor-Baltork and H. Aliyan, Synth. Commun., 28, 3943–3947 (1998).13. I. Mohammadpoor-Baltork and A. R. Khosropour, Molecules, 6, 996–1000 (2001).14. B. Yadollahi, S. Tangestaninejad, and M. H. Habibi, Synth. Commun., 34, 2823–2827 (2004).15. N. Iranpoor and B. Zeynizadeh, Synth. Commun., 28, 3913–3918 (1998).16. P. Salehi, M. M. Khodaei, M. A. Zolfigol, and A. Keyvan, Synth. Commun., 33, 3041–3048
(2003).17. H. Firouzabadi, N. Iranpoor, and A. Khoshnood, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 274, 109–115 (2007).18. I. Mohammadpoor-Baltork and A. R. Khosropour, Asian Chem. Lett., 2, 123–127 (1998).19. F. Kazemi, A. R. Kiasat, and S. Ebrahimi, Synth. Commun., 33, 595–600 (2003).20. C. S. Reddy and S. Nagavani, Heteroatom Chem., 19, 97–99 (2008).21. B. P. Bandgar, A. V. Patil, V. T. Kamble, and J. V. Totre, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 273, 114–117
(2007).22. J. S. Yadav, B. V. Subba Reddy, S. Sengupta, M. K. Gupta, G. Baishya, S. J. Harshavardhana,
and U. Dash, Monatsh. Chem., 139, 1363–1367 (2008).23. F. Kazemi and A. R. Kiasat, Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem., 178, 1333–1337 (2003).24. I. Mohammadpoor-Baltork and H. Aliyan, J. Chem. Res., 122–123 (2000).25. B. P. Bandgar, N. S. Joshi, and V. T. Kamble, Tetrahedron Lett., 47, 4775–4777 (2006).26. V. Mirkhani, S. Tangestaninejad, and L. Alipanah, Synth. Commun., 32, 621–626 (2002).27. N. Iranpoor and F. Kazemi, Synthesis, 821–822 (1996).28. M. Moghadam, S. Tangestaninejad, V. Mirkhani, and R. Shaibani, Tetrahedron, 60, 6105–6111
(2004).29. M. Moghadam, S. Tangestaninejad, V. Mirkhani, I. Mohammadpoor-Baltork, and S. A. Taghavi,
Catal. Commun., 8, 2087–2095 (2007).30. J. S. Yadav, B. V. Subba Reddy, C. S. Reddy, and K. Rajasekhar, J. Org. Chem., 68, 2525–2527
(2003).31. K. Surendra, N. S. Krishnaveni, and K. Rama Rao, Tetrahedron Lett., 45, 6523–6526 (2004).32. N. Iranpoor, B. Tamami, and M. Shekarriz, Synth. Commun., 29, 3313–3321 (1999).33. B. Tamami and K. P. Borujeny, Synth. Commun., 34, 65–70 (2004).34. B. Tamami and M. Kolahdoozan, Tetrahedron Lett., 45, 1535–1537 (2004).
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Um
eå U
nive
rsity
Lib
rary
] at
09:
04 0
8 O
ctob
er 2
013
ZEOLITE MOLECULAR SIEVE 4Å 1909
35. L. Wu, Y. Wang, F. Yan, and C. Yang, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 31, 1419–1420 (2010).36. B. Kaboudin and H. Norouzi, Synthesis, 2035–2039 (2004).37. B. Zeynizadeh and S. Yeghaneh, Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem., 183, 2280–2286 (2008).38. B. Zeynizadeh and S. Yeghaneh, Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem., 184, 362–368 (2009).39. (a) J. Cejka, A. Corma, and S. Zones, Zeolites and Catalysis: Synthesis, Reactions and Applica-
tions (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2010); (b) J. Cejka, H. van Bekkum, A. Corma, and F. Schueth,Introduction to Zeolite Molecular Sieves (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007), 3rd ed.; (c) W. H. Flank,and G. T. Kerr, Perspectives in Molecular Sieve Science, ACS Symposium Series (ACS, Wash-ington, 1988), Vol 368; (d) V. Ya Nikolina, I. E. Neimark, and M. A. Piontkovskaya, Russ.Chem. Rev., 29, 509–521 (1960).
40. A. Corma, F. Rey, J. Rius, M. J. Sabater, and S. Valencia, Nature, 431, 287–290 (2004).41. S. M. Kuznicki, V. A. Bell, S. Nair, H. W. Hillhouse, R. M. Jacubinas, C. M. Braunbarth, B. H.
Toby, and M. Tsapatsis, Nature, 412, 720–724 (2001).42. A. Stankiewicz, Chem. Eng. Process., 42, 137–144 (2003).43. P. T. Anastas, M. M. Kirchhoff, and T. C. Williamson, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 221, 3–13 (2001).44. S. Choi, J. Coronas, E. Jordan, W. Oh, S. Nair, F. Onorato, D. F. Shantz, and M. Tsapatsis, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Eng., 47, 552–555 (2008).45. (a) M. Danilczuk, K. Dlugopolska, T. Ruman, and D. Pogocki, Mini Rev. Med. Chem., 8,
1407–1417 (2008); (b) J. Galownia, J. Martin, and M. E. Davis, Microporous MesoporousMater., 92, 61–63 (2006).
46. H. Oguz and V. Kurtoglu, Br. Poult. Sci., 41, 512–517 (2000).47. H. J. Schwenn, M. Wark, G. Schulz-Ekloff, H. Wiggerss, and U. Simon, Colloid Polym. Sci.,
275, 91–95 (1997).48. A. M. Grancaric, L. Markovic, and A. Tarbuk, Tekstil, 56, 533–542 (2007).49. M. Tsapatsis, AIChE J., 48, 654–660 (2002).50. H. Bouda, M. E. Borredon, M. Delmas, and A. Gaset, Synth. Commun., 19, 491–500 (1989).51. (a) E. Chiellini, M. Marchetti, and G. Ceccarelli, Int. J. Sulfur Chem. A, 1, 73–76 (1971); (b) K.
Soai and T. Mukaiyama, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 52, 3371–3376 (1979).
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Um
eå U
nive
rsity
Lib
rary
] at
09:
04 0
8 O
ctob
er 2
013