year emission scenario -- b1 a1b a2€¦ · ericameria linearifolia. a, potential suitable habitat...

1
Figure 75. Ericameria linearifolia. A, Potential suitable habitat for species based on average annual and monthly precipitation and temperature from 1971 to 2000, continuous model output with no threshold. B, Potential suitable habitat, binary output using .5 threshold. C-E, Potential suitable habitat predicted by year 2050 under emission scenario (C), B1, (D), A1B, (E), A2. F-H, Potential suitable habitat predicted by year 2100 under emission scenario (F), B1, (G), A1B, (H), A2. I-K, Number of 2050 emission scenario models predicting each suitability class, (I), increased suitability, (J), maintained suitability, (K), decreased suitabil- ity. L-N, Number of 2100 emission scenario models predicting each suitability class, (L), increased suitabil- ity, (M), maintained suitability, and (N), decreased suitability. EXPLANATION Potential Suitable Habitat, Current No threshold High : 0.797972 Low : 9.70534e-006 Potential Suitable Habitat, Current No threshold High : 0.966768 Low : 1.08146e-024 Year Emission Scenario -- B1 A1B A2 Year Suitability Class -- Increased Maintained Decreased 2100 2050 2100 2050 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N 0 300 600 Miles EXPLANATION Model Agreement 0 models 1 model 2 models 3 models EXPLANATION Potential Future Suitable Habitat Unsuitable Decreased Increased Maintained EXPLANATION Potential Suitable Habitat, Current Threshold: 50% Unsuitable Suitable EXPLANATION

Upload: others

Post on 29-Jan-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Figure 75. Ericameria linearifolia. A, Potential suitable habitat for species based on average annual and

    monthly precipitation and temperature from 1971 to 2000, continuous model output with no threshold. B,

    Potential suitable habitat, binary output using .5 threshold. C-E, Potential suitable habitat predicted by year

    2050 under emission scenario (C), B1, (D), A1B, (E), A2. F-H, Potential suitable habitat predicted by year

    2100 under emission scenario (F), B1, (G), A1B, (H), A2. I-K, Number of 2050 emission scenario models

    predicting each suitability class, (I), increased suitability, (J), maintained suitability, (K), decreased suitabil-

    ity. L-N, Number of 2100 emission scenario models predicting each suitability class, (L), increased suitabil-

    ity, (M), maintained suitability, and (N), decreased suitability.

    EXPLANATION

    Potential Suitable Habitat, Current

    No threshold

    High : 0.797972

    Low : 9.70534e-006

    Potential Suitable Habitat, Current

    No threshold

    High : 0.966768

    Low : 1.08146e-024

    Year Emission Scenario -- B1 A1B A2

    Year Suitability Class -- Increased Maintained Decreased

    2100

    2050

    2100

    2050

    A B

    C D E

    F G H

    I J K

    L M N

    0 300 600

    Miles

    EXPLANATION

    Model Agreement

    0 models

    1 model

    2 models

    3 models

    EXPLANATION

    Potential Future Suitable Habitat

    Unsuitable

    Decreased

    Increased

    Maintained

    EXPLANATION

    Potential Suitable Habitat, Current

    Threshold: 50%

    Unsuitable

    Suitable

    EXPLANATION