www.company.com electronic content/ electronic document management system (ec/edms) project closeout...
TRANSCRIPT
www.company.com
Electronic Content/ Electronic Document Management System
(EC/EDMS) Project
Closeout PresentationDecember 15, 2010
Sandra Jaramillo, Director of State Records and Archives (SRCA)Joel Matek, CIO Tax and Revenue Department (TRD)Debra Saiz, ITPM Human Services Department (HSD)
www.company.com
History:
•HSD and TRD independently submitted funding requests to develop an EDMS Solution.
•SRCA, also submitted a request to assess the Electronic Records Environment in State Government.
•Per State CIO, the requests were combined into a multi-agency funding request in 2004-2005.
2
2004
C-3 Combined Multiagency
www.company.com
History: Appropriation Description
Subsection 6, Section 8, Chapter 114, Laws 2004, appropriation was approved for implementing a multi-agency system for imaging and archiving documents electronically to improve access, integration and accuracy of information.
3
Laws 2004Agency General Fund
Estimated Federal Fund Match
SRCA $180,000
TRD $636,952
HSD $383,048 $791,992
Total $1,200,000 $791,992
www.company.com
History: Split HSD and TRD into separate projects
CSED
•Procurement issues were addressed during FY2006.
•HSD Child Support Enforcement Division(CSED) reviewed the project and identified the best use of resources.
•HSD CSED and TRD RPD were selected to implement EDMS.
•HSD CSED and TRD RPD would implement independent EDMS Projects.
•Laws 2008, Chapter 3, Section 7, Subsection 25 Reauthorized the appropriation and granted a final extension through FY2010.
4
Project Review
20062007
2008
www.company.com
Consolidated Agency Budgets
Description General
Funds (GF) Appropriation
HSD GF TRD GF SRCA GF Total GF
Remaining After Expenditures
Federal Funds (FF)
Appropriation
HSD FF Expenditure
Total FF Remaining
After Expenditures
Expenditures
OCIO Letter of Oct. 19, 2004
$240,000
$240,000
FY04 Expenditures
-
-
-
FY05 Expenditures
(6,482)
(19,064)
(180,000)
34,454
(12,582) (12,582)
OCIO Letter Jul. 27, 2005
960,000
994,454
ACF Letter of Sep. 27, 2005
791,992
779,410 FY06 Expenditures
(29,418)
(86,523)
878,513 (57,105)
722,304
FY07 Expenditures
(27,887)
(81,606)
769,020 (51,733)
670,571
FY08 Expenditures
(201,923)
(407,759)
159,339 (391,968)
278,604
FY09 Expenditures
(14,035)
(42,000)
103,303 (27,245)
251,359
FY10 Expenditures
(100,051) 3,253
(194,216) 57,143
TOTALS
$1,200,000
$(379,795)
$(636,952)
$(180,000) $791,992
$(734,849)
Total Reverted
Funds$3,253 $57,143
5
www.company.com
SRCA: Project Description
• Goal: Assess electronic records environment in state government and formulate strategies for the capture and preservation of electronic records through an electronic records management systems (ERMS).
• Appropriation Allocation: $180K
• Timeline: March 2005, SRCA contracted Optimos Inc. to conduct assessment (SPD#30-000-00-0061).
• Completion: Assessment completed June 22, 2005.
6
www.company.com
SRCA: Outcome
•Document Creation
•Document Workflow
•Document Capture
•Document Classification
•Records Conservation
•Records Compliance
•Records Disposition
DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT
RECORDS MANAGEMENT
•Manage Content
•Define Context
•Enable Control
• SRCA developed a framework for implementation of a state-wide ERMS/EDMS solution.
HSD and TRD Goals
SRCA Goals
7
www.company.com
SRCA: Outcome/Benefits/Drawbacks
Outcome Benefits Drawbacks
SRCA developed a framework for implementation of a state-wide ERMS/EDMS solution.
Provided strategy for improving management of inactive electronic records residing in an EDMS.
No available funds to implement solution.
Provided strategy for moving from paper-based workflow process to EDMS driven process.
Length of time required to implement EDMS. Agencies have differing amounts of paper intensive business processes in place.
8
www.company.com
IndexInformation
HSD: Agency Project Description
CSED Staff can successfully reduce the time of access from a three to five day wait to a few minutes.
The HSD Electronic Document Management Systems (EDMS) project converts Child Support paper files into electronic formats.
Prepare Cases
ScanDocuments
StoreDocuments
Faster and Accurate Workflow
MainframePosting
9
Child Support ApplicationCourt OrdersEmployer VerificationAcknowledgement of Paternity (AOP) Form
www.company.com
HSD: Agency Project Cost
HSD’S EXPENDITURE
Description Original Budget ARRA Funds Total
Professional Service $503,703 $30,352 $534,055
Hardware $194,930 $36,855 $231,785
Software $415,803 $73,171 $488,974
Network $0 $0 $0
Other $208 $0 $208
Total $1,114,644 $140,378 $1,255,022
10
www.company.com
Procurement Issues Delay Project Six Months
HSD: Agency Project Timeline
11
Agencies to Submitted Request for Funding
SRCA to Completed the Assessment
EDMS Project Planned To End
Agencies Submitted Request for Funding
SRCA Completed the Assessment
Federal Review Delays Project Three Months
EDMS Project Planned Closeout
EDMS Project Closeout
Plan
Actual2004 2005
EDMS Pilot Goes Live in Three Offices
2006 2008 20092007 2010
Reconciliation of funds
Remaining Funds Used for Production Expansion to Remaining Office.
Project Reinstated
HSD and TRD Split Funds
Deployed EDMS
www.company.com
HSD: Outcome/Benefits/Drawbacks
Outcome Benefits Drawbacks
Open to 410 Users (Field Staff, Call Center Staff, Corresponding Posting Staff).
Reliable, faster and easier retrieval of documents.
Deployed to17 field offices. Simultaneous access to documents by multiple people.Requires vendor support Maintenance and Operations.
The ability to scan and manage the Application, Court Order, Employment Verification and Acknowledgement of Paternity (AOP) Form.
Ability to share case files across related lines of business.
The system will process over 40,000 pages of material per month.
Reduces the time of access from a 3 to 5 day wait to a few minutes.
Accessible from any Child Support Enforcement System (CSES) networked computer.
Manage subsequent updates.
HSD CSED established a document database.
With approximately 63,000 open Child Support Cases every office and every case has need of the ability to have the Application, Court Order, Employment Verification and Acknowledgement of Paternity (AOP) Form captured and managed.
Future document data storage costs.
HSD selected IBM”s robust enterprise-class platform.
Manageable to rollout to additional users, and/or expand its capabilities further.
Requires technical staff to be IBM Certified.
12
www.company.com
HSD: Moving Forward
HSD’s EDMS FileNet System is built on an enterprise-class platform.•Equipped to roll out applications to additional users.•Built to expand on its capabilities further.
Operating System
Storage Device Drivers
Document Imaging
Data Base Service
Base Application Service
Document Management
Integrated Document
Archiving & Retrieval
Routine Workflow
The Structure of HSD’s EDMS
13
www.company.com
TRD: Project Description
• Goal:
– Improve TRD services specifically for Motor Vehicle Division (MVD) and the Revenue Processing Division (RPD)
– Improve business processes for Motor Vehicle citations with ECM solutions, including:
• Document Imaging
• Electronic Document Management
• Workflow Management
• Appropriation Allocation: $636,952
14
www.company.com
TRD: Project Cost
TRD’s Cost Breakdown of General Funds Expenditures
Professional Services $410,482
Hardware $32,589
Software $193,673
Other $208
Total $636,952
15
www.company.com
TRD: Outcome/Benefits/Drawbacks
Outcome Benefits Drawbacks
Established metadata and procedural process with SRCA; available as a model for future TRD ECM projects.
Clear advantages for MVD: data is accessible in minutes instead of days/weeks.
No real process improvement for RPD with MVD citations.
Central repository of citation material.Scanned citations available from 85 field offices instead of only microfilm at HQ.
Only used intermittently due to RPD issues/preferences.
Needed stronger TRD executive support; competition for resources.
RPD resources not available during tax season (Dec – May).
TRD does not have the budget for maintenance and operation.
16
www.company.com
TRD: Lessons Learned
17
• Citation record is complicated; may have been better to start ECM with simpler record series, smaller scope.
• “Black box” solution does not allow modifications without vendor assistance/cost.
• TRD requires a highly sophisticated KFI application to fulfill the high volume citation processes for MVD; this solution did not allow TRD to reach daily goals.
• Officer handwriting causes most citations to require data entry, don’t go through automatic path.
• Should have put emphasis on TRACS and receiving data electronically instead of ECM for MVD citations.
• Key staff turnover and lack of adequate cross training had negative affects.
www.company.com
Future Expansion
The Future for Enterprise
Content Management
System
Web ContentManagement
Records Management
Digital Asset Management
Email Archiving
Forms Processing
WorkflowManagement
Document Centric
Collaboration
18
• Expanding on the ECMS Investment:
• The EDMS platform has the potential to expand its capabilities to seven additional modules.
• Evaluate future options based on business process.
• Evaluate future resources based on potential cost savings.
www.company.com
In Conclusion:
• Secure funding for an Enterprise Content Management System which will serve as a Centralized Electronic Records Repository.
• Promulgate metadata standards to ensure the accurate and low cost capture, management and legal disposition of inactive electronic records.
• Adopt an ECM strategy that combines a centralized approach to records management with distributed implementation of electronic document management systems.
29
www.company.com
Lessons Learned
• Sufficient resources (staff and funding) are required for the implementation of an enterprise content management solution. This prevents delays and allows the work to be carried out in a timely fashion.
• Records management should be recognized as a core business function. This allows for records to be controlled and accessible.
• For EDMS to succeed, automated workflow analysis is a critical business functions. This allows continuous field office performance improvement through automation capabilities.
• A solid data governance structure is required for an effective Enterprise e-records management. This allows for the overall management of the availability, usability, integrity, and security of the data employed in an enterprise.
20
www.company.com
Questions:21