writing an affidavit: tips and an example · child, young person1 and family. however, there are...
TRANSCRIPT
Information in this factsheet was derived from DCJ Practice Mandates and training (V1)
Last Updated 17 Dec 2019 1
Writing an affidavit: tips and an example
Introduction
Writing to a court standard may be a new area of work for Funded Service Providers
(FSPs). It is understandably daunting for many caseworkers including Department of
Communities and Justice staff.
Most Caseworkers experienced in writing affidavits will tell you they learnt from
making mistakes and having to fix them. Mistakes are part of learning.
No two affidavits will be the same, as they are specific to the circumstances of each
child, young person1 and family. However, there are some general rules which you
can follow to ensure your affidavit conforms to the court expectation for layout and
composition.
To be legally admissible at court, an affidavit’s must be:
• ‘sworn’ or ‘affirmed’ as true by the deponent (author)
• witnessed by an authorised person, which is usually a justice of the peace or legal
practitioner.
Affidavits tips:
• include all relevant facts
• write in the first person using an active voice
• use the correct naming conventions
• use the child or family’s own words
• use descriptions of what you saw and heard rather than conclusions
• provide context to situations which could be misinterpreted
• date all records and include the time of the event and who was present
• divide information under appropriate headings and sub-heading
• list information in chronological order
• use full sentences and be concise
• number pages and annexures
1 Throughout this document we use the word child in place of child or young person.
Information in this factsheet was derived from DCJ Practice Mandates and training (V1)
Last Updated 17 Dec 2019 2
• summarise annexures in the body of the affidavit, and annex them in full.
Do not include your feelings or personal judgements in your affidavit
Remember, our perceptions of events and conversations are seen through our own
lens, impacted by our life experiences and beliefs. Caseworker affidavits have a
significant influence over court outcomes – ensure you are as objective as possible
and just.
Language is the power your words have on practice. It frames whose
view of reality you are accepting and the type of change you hope to
create
Include all relevant facts:
Affidavits should contain comprehensive facts only, not your feelings or opinions.
The only exception to this is if you are a qualified expert, like a court clinician’s
assessment.
In a child protection context, facts are things you saw and heard or things you can demonstrate. Rather than drawing conclusions on conversations, describe what you
saw and heard, for example instead of saying ‘Amy was upset’ say ‘I saw Amy crying’.
Casework staff must include all relevant information in their affidavit, even if it
doesn’t support their preferred outcome or draws attention to poor casework .
Deliberately misleading the court or giving false and misleading evidence is
considered perjury.
Information in this factsheet was derived from DCJ Practice Mandates and training (V1)
Last Updated 17 Dec 2019 3
Write in the first person using an active voice:
Writing in the first person means writing from the author’s point of view.
I saw Fatima cry and her shoulders were shaking.
Writing in an active voice describes a sentence where the subject performs an action
stated by the verb, for example:
Mr Jones kicked Pearl on her left shin.
Writing in the first-person active voice is important in affidavit writing because it
describes events from the authors perspective and ensures descriptions are clear.
I went to Pearl’s school and spoke to her NOT Pearl was spoken to at school.
Use correct naming conventions:
Use consistent naming conventions throughout an affidavit. The first time you
reference a person, you need to use their full name (first, middle and surname) and then in brackets list the name you will refer to them as to for the remainder of the
affidavit. For children, this is usually their first name. For professionals and adults, it
is usually Ms or Mr Surname. You also need to include the date of birth for all subject
children, their parents and, in some cases, grandparents.
Example child: Pearl Anna Oswald, born 23 May 2010 (“Pearl”)
Example Manager Casework: Jane Smith (“Ms Smith”)
You should use these same naming conventions for any abbreviated word in your affidavit. For example, the first time you refer to DCJ, write: The Department of
Tip: When writing about conversations in an affidavit include:
▪ when the conversation took place
▪ where it took place
▪ who was present
▪ use the childsor parents own words when possible.
Information in this factsheet was derived from DCJ Practice Mandates and training (V1)
Last Updated 17 Dec 2019 4
Communities and Justice (“DCJ”) and then you can use DCJ for the remainder of the
affidavit.
Use headings and list information in chronological order and be
concise:
Affidavits can become very lengthy. An affidavit providing historical casework
information is frequently in excess of 20 pages plus annexures. To keep information
clear, affidavits have a prescribed format:
• number each paragraph
• use headings and sub-headings to group similar information
• list facts chronologically within each heading
• use full sentences but be concise – every paragraph should describe an event or
issue.
• tables can be useful to make information clear.
It is expected that the first few paragraphs of an affidavit will follow a similar format,
that is:
1. who you work for and how long you have worked there
2. the qualifications you hold
3. your relationship to the subject child and the length of that relationship.
4. who you report to
5. confirm you have access to records on the subject child
6. affirm or swear that the contents of the affidavit are true.
Number pages and annexures correctly:
Sequencing pages and annexures in affidavits is very important, as it helps to
structure complex (and often lengthy) information:
• the pages of the affidavit must be sequenced numerically, i.e., page 1, page 2,
page 3. Do not include annexures in this sequence.
• the pages of each individual annexure must be numbered numerically.
Information in this factsheet was derived from DCJ Practice Mandates and training (V1)
Last Updated 17 Dec 2019 5
• annexures must be sequenced alphabetically, i.e., Annexure A, Annexure B,
Annexure C. If there are more than 26 annexures, the 27 th will be Annexure AA, and
the 28th will be Annexure AB.
Annexures:
When referencing an annexure in the body of an affidavit write:
“Annexed and marked “A” is a copy of…….”
Annexures must then be summarised, so the reader of the affidavit gets an
understanding of the results before reading the full annexure.
Each annexure attached must have the following introduction:
“This page and the following _ page/s comprise/s of the document referred to as Annexure _ in the affidavit of [insert deponent’s name] sworn/affirmed at
[insert place] on [insert date] before me [witness to sign and provide name
and qualification]”.
You must number the pages of an affidavit numerically from 1 to the end. The
annexure is numbered separately.
For more information about affidavits see the affidavits: the basics factsheet.
Below is a fictional example (from a Funded Service Provider).
Information in this factsheet was derived from DCJ Practice Mandates and training (V1)
Last Updated 17 Dec 2019 6
IN THE CHILDREN’S COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
AT SMARTVILLE
CASE NUMBER 2019/000111
Affidavit Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998
Child
Name Pearl Anna Oswald
23 May 2010
Application details
Type of application Care Application
Date application filed 28 March 2019
Affidavit
Name Sharon Porter
Address Short Street, Smartville NSW, 7777
Date affirmed 29 June 2019
I affirm:
1. I am employed as a family worker at Alternative Care (‘AC’) in Smartville. I have been
employed as a family worker since 18 July 2018.
2. I hold a Diploma of Community Services from Ballina TAFE.
Information in this factsheet was derived from DCJ Practice Mandates and training (V1)
Last Updated 17 Dec 2019 7
3. Since 30 April 2019, I have had the day to day responsibility for the casework in
relation to Pearl Anna Oswald born 23 May 2010 (“Pearl”). My Manager is Jane Smith
(“Ms Smith”).
4. Case management responsibility for Pearl was transferred from Department of
Communities and Justice (“DCJ”) to AC on 28 April 2019.
5. I have access to the AC records relating to Pearl. I have read those records.
Information referred to in this affidavit that is not known to me personally is contained
in those records.
6. All information referred to in this affidavit is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge.
Family Relationships
7. Sheree Oswald born 3 December 1987 (“Ms Oswald”) is Pearl’s mother.
8. Blake King born 6 January 1980 (“Mr King”) is Pearl’s father.
9. Tiara McNee (“Tiara”) is Pearl’s paternal half sibling. Tiara is married to Elvis McNee
(‘Elvis’). Tiara and Elvis have a child, Alex, who is aged 9 years. Tiara and Elvis are
Peal’s carers.
Current proceedings
Information in this factsheet was derived from DCJ Practice Mandates and training (V1)
Last Updated 17 Dec 2019 8
10. On 2 April 2019, an interim order was made by Smartville Children’s Court allocating
all aspects of parental responsibility for Pearl to the Minister for DCJ until further
order.
11. On 30 April 2019, a finding was made by Smartville Children’s Court that Pearl is in
need of care and protection.
Pearl’s placement
12. Pearl was placed with Tiara and Elvis McNee on 25 March 2019. She has lived with
them since.
13. Tiara and Elvis were fully authorised to be Pearl’s carers on 15 May 2019. They are
willing to provide long term care for Pearl if this is required.
14. I have undertaken five home visits to Pearl in her placement with Tiara and Elvis. On
average I have spent an hour each visit, talking to Pearl and her carers. On each
occasion, being 29 April 2019, 18 May 2019, 25 May 2019, 8 June 2019 and 28 June 2019,
I have observed Pearl as being happy and content with Tiara and Elvis. My
observations of the interaction between Pearl, Tiara, Elvis and Alex, suggest that Pearl
has quickly developed a close and loving relationship with the family.
Annexed and marked “A” is a copy of the home visit records.
Pearl’s health and education
Information in this factsheet was derived from DCJ Practice Mandates and training (V1)
Last Updated 17 Dec 2019 9
15. On entering Out of Home Care, Pearl was referred for an Out of Home Care Health
Pathways assessment. She was determined to be in generally good health but needs
extensive dental work. She has since attended an initial appointment with her dentist
for urgent fillings and has more appointments scheduled in the next three months for
less urgent work.
16. Since moving to her placement with Tiara and Elvis, Pearl has been attending
Smartville Primary School, the same school which Alex attends. On 28 June 2019, I had
a telephone conversation with Mr Arnold, Pearl’s teacher, who said to me words to the
following effect: Pearl has settled in really well and despite being a little below what
we would expect when she started is now generally in the mid-range of achievement.
She gets on well with the other students and appears to have made some close friends .
Contact arrangements
Since entering care in March 2019, a contact schedule was devised for Pearl to have
weekly contact visits with her mother. Pearl has contact with Ms Oswald on Tuesday
afternoon each week for about 2 hours. The contact is supervised by myself or
someone else employed by AC.
17. Since AC has had case management, there have been 20 scheduled contacts for Ms
Oswald and Pearl. Ms Oswald has attended 18 of these. The contact has been
positive. Ms Oswald and Pearl have a close and warm relationship and Ms Oswald is
able to engage with Pearl for extended periods and to attend to her needs during
the contact. Ms Oswald usually brings small gifts for Pearl and activities, such as
games and colouring books, which they can do together.
Annexed and marked “B” are copies of the contact records.
Information in this factsheet was derived from DCJ Practice Mandates and training (V1)
Last Updated 17 Dec 2019 10
18. On 15 May 2019, Ms Oswald advised me that she was unwell and would be unable to
attend the contact on 16 May 2019. On 16 June 2019, Ms Oswald also missed contact
with Pearl. When she had not arrived at contact, I called her, and Ms Oswald advised
that she had missed the train from Sydney.
19. Mr King was in jail in Sydney. On 15 June 2019, the Local Court at Sydney made a
two-year AVO prohibiting contact between Mr King and Pearl. AC has accordingly
not made arrangements for contact between Pearl and Mr King.
20. Pearl has had contact with her paternal extended family on several occasions since
AC has had case management which has been arranged by her carers. This has
included contact with her paternal grandmother, her cousins and other Aunts and
Uncles.
Ms Oswald’s progress in meeting the objectives outlined in the Summary Proposed Plan
21. The Summary of Proposed Plan required that Ms Oswald:
(a) demonstrate through supervised drug screens her abstinence from unlawful drug
use;
(b) maintain engagement with services including but not limited to FACS, Helping
Hands Women’s DV Assistance, Drug & Alcohol and Smartville Neighbourhood
Centre; and
(c) not be involved in any incidents of domestic violence.
• Compliance with supervised drug screens
Information in this factsheet was derived from DCJ Practice Mandates and training (V1)
Last Updated 17 Dec 2019 11
22. Since case management was transferred to AC 28 April 2019, Ms Oswald has been
participating in supervised random urinary drug screens (“UDS”). AC notifies Ms
Oswald by text message when she needs to attend UDS and she is to provide a
sample within 24 hours of receiving the text or contact AC if she is unable to attend.
Information in this factsheet was derived from DCJ Practice Mandates and training (V1)
Last Updated 17 Dec 2019 12
23. The following table shows the requests for UDS that have been made, Ms Oswald’s
attendance and the result
UDS Request date Attendance date Result Additional Information
5 May 2019 Did not attend No explanation was
provided for non-
attendance.
16 May 2019 16 May 2019 Methamphetamine
detected
28 May 2019 28 May 2019 Methamphetamine
detected
1 June 2019 1 June 2019 Methamphetamine
detected
5 June 2019 5 June 2019 Clean
8 June 2019 8 June 2019 Clean
13 June 2019 Did not attend Explanation provided that in
Sydney for Court
20 June 2019 21 June 2019 Clean
26 June 2019 26 June 2019 Clean
Annexed and marked “C” are copies of the UDS results.
Information in this factsheet was derived from DCJ Practice Mandates and training (V1)
Last Updated 17 Dec 2019 13
24. On 8 June 2019, I telephoned Ms Owald’s Drug and Alcohol counsellor, Jason
Murray, who advised that Ms Oswald was engaging in the Drug Recovery Program.
He said to me words to the following effect: Sheree has been working hard to abstain
from drug use. She is making progress and reports that she has not used meth for the
past two weeks. So far in the program we have focussed on understanding
dependency and on harm reduction. We are now focussing on relapse prevention. We
have six more weeks before the Program is completed.
• (b) Engagement with services
25. On 9 May 2019, I met with Ms Oswald and she advised me that she had begun a 6-
week DV course at Helping Hands and that she had also enrolled in a parenting
course with the Neighbourhood Centre. She told me that both courses started the
next week. Ms Oswald also told me that Mr King had been ringing her from jail and
she had reported that to the Police.
26. On 8 June 2019, I telephoned the Helping Hands DV service to enquire about Ms
Oswald’s progress. I spoke to the Coordinator who said to me words to the following
effect: “Ms Oswald signed up to do the course in early May and attended the first two
sessions, but we haven’t seen her since that time. I left a few messages on her phone
but she didn’t call back”.
27. On 8 June 2019, I telephoned the Neighbourhood Centre to enquire about Ms
Oswald’s progress in the parenting courses. The Coordinator said to me words to
the following effect: “Ms Oswald signed up to do the courses in early May and
attended the first two sessions, but we haven’t seen her since early June”.
Information in this factsheet was derived from DCJ Practice Mandates and training (V1)
Last Updated 17 Dec 2019 14
28. As a result of this information, I attempted to contact Ms Oswald by telephone on 8
June 2019 and 14 June 2019. On each occasion I left a voice message when the call
went to message bank; and I also forwarded text messages asking her to call me
urgently. I did not receive any response.
29. On 17 June 2018, in company with Caseworker Robin Fox, I attended Ms Oswald’s
home and spoke to Ms Oswald. I asked why she had not been attending the courses
and she said to me words to the effect of: Everything has got on top of me. I’ve been
stressed about going to Court for the AVO with Blake. I’ve been trying to get clean and
stay clean. It’s just got too much.
30. I let Ms Oswald know that her last two UDS results were clean. I also acknowledged
that it would have been difficult and stressful for her to give evidence against Mr
King earlier that week. I did however confirm with Ms Oswald, that she needed to
attend and complete these courses so that we could continue to support a possible
restoration of Peal to her. Ms Oswald was visibly upset and was tearful throughout
the meeting. Ms Oswald agreed to re-commence attending the courses.
Annexed and marked “D” is a copy of my home visit record.
31. On 28 June 2019, I telephoned Helping Hands who confirmed that Ms Oswald has
attended on 22 June 2019. I also telephoned the Neighbourhood Centre who
advised that Ms Oswald had recommenced attendance on 18 June 2019 and had
attended two further sessions since that date.
(c) not be involved in any incidents of domestic violence.
Information in this factsheet was derived from DCJ Practice Mandates and training (V1)
Last Updated 17 Dec 2019 15
32. On 15 June 2019, Ms Oswald gave evidence to the Local Court at Sydney in relation
to the family violence that she had experienced in relationship with Mr King and that
Pearl witnessed. The Local Court made a 2-year AVO order for her and Pearl’s
protection.
33. I also sought information from NSW Police under Chapter 16A about whether there
have been any further reports or complaints regarding domestic violence involving
Ms Oswald since Pearl entered care. On 27 June 2019, I was advised by NSW Police ,
that other than the reports that Ms Oswald made regarding the calls by Mr King while
he was in jail, there had been no further reported incidents.
Future Plans for the child
34. On 27 June 2018, I participated in a meeting involving my manager, Jane Smith, and
DCJ caseworker Mary Jones and her Manager Michael Matthews and casework
specialist Trudy Valentine. A decision was made to continue to support Pearl being
restored to Ms Oswald.
Annexed and marked “E” is a copy of the meeting record.
35. On 28 June 2019, I attended Ms Oswald’s home and told her that the decision had
been made to continue to support restoration of Pearl to her. I advised Ms Oswald
that she needed to keep working on keeping clean, on attending the Drug Recovery
Program and the parenting and domestic violence courses. I acknowledged the
progress she had already made and said that we needed to see this continue. Ms
Oswald said to me words to the following effect: I will do everything I can to have
Pearl live with me again. I hadn’t realised how bad things had gotten between me and
Blake or how bad it was for Peal to see that. I don’t want her to grow up thinking that
violence like that is OK. I’m trying to stay clean. It’s hard, but I know I need to keep
clean for myself and for Pearl.
Information in this factsheet was derived from DCJ Practice Mandates and training (V1)
Last Updated 17 Dec 2019 16
Annexed and marked “F” is a copy of the record of my visit with Ms Oswald.
36. On 28 June 2019, I also attended Tiara and Elvis’ home to let them know that the
decision had been made to continue to support restoration between Pearl and Ms
Oswald. Tiara said that she and Elvis were willing to support restoration, but they
were concerned that Ms Oswald would not be able to keep things together and that
Pearl would end up being more traumatised and upset. I told Tiara and Elvis that a
restoration wouldn’t occur until Ms Oswald had been able to show that she had
made some longer-term changes and until the Court approved that as a plan for
Pearl. Tiara and Elvis said they wanted what was best for Pearl. They said if
restoration to Ms Oswald couldn’t proceed, they wanted to continue to care for
Pearl.
37. I also spoke to Pearl. Pearl told me that she loves living with Tiara and Elvis and
Alex. She said she feels safe and happy. She said she misses Ms Oswald and that
she looks forward to seeing her. She said to me words to the following effect: I miss
Mum and I love her. I want her to get better. I love Auntie Tiara and Uncle Elvis and
living here, but I love my Mum too.
Annexed and marked “G” is a copy of my home visit record.
Signature
Affirmed at
Signature of deponent
Date
Before me:
Name of witness
Information in this factsheet was derived from DCJ Practice Mandates and training (V1)
Last Updated 17 Dec 2019 17
Capacity Justice of the Peace Other [please specify]
Registration number
I certify the following matters concerning the person who made this affidavit (the
deponent):
1. I saw the face of the deponent; or [delete whichever option if inapplicable]
I did not see the face of the deponent because the deponent was wearing a face covering but I am satisfied that the deponent had a special justification for not removing the covering.
2. I have known the deponent for at least 12 months; or [delete whichever option if
inapplicable]
I have confirmed the deponent’s identity using the following identification document:
Identification document
relied on
Signature
Date
[NOTE: The deponent and witness must sign each page of the Affidavit .