wp2: participatory innovation network · pdf file · 2016-01-26–...
TRANSCRIPT
1/26/2016
1
WP2: Participatory innovation network
• Objectives– Participatory design of agroecological practices adapted to farmer needs,
market demand and local contexts,– Support village communities in managing their on‐farm experiments and
demonstration activities,– ‘Experiment – Demonstration – Training’ network managed by multiple
stakeholders including farmers’ groups, district officers, private sector, etc.)
• Expected outputs– A range of innovative agricultural systems tested on‐farm and diffusing
through farmers field schools and other farmer to farmer learning initiatives,– A consortium of stakeholders managing and innovation network combining
on‐farm and on‐station experiments, demonstrations and training,– Lessons from the participatory innovation network are documented.
WP2 ‐ Diagnosis
2D1. Study of innovative agricultural systems at national, provincial and district levels
• literature review and surveys of on‐going projects• documenting promising agroecological practices• potential obstacles to their adoption/diffusion
2D2. Village level agroecological baseline• science‐based environmental baseline • indicators development and calibration (including livestock)• carbon, biodiversity and soil measurements and analysis
WP2. Participatory innovation network 2D 2A 2M
1/26/2016
2
WP2 ‐ Action
2A1. On‐farm experiments‐demonstration‐training• On‐farm experiments (comparison innovative vs traditional practice)• On‐farm demonstration sites (1‐2 per pilot village, total of 1 ha)• Training – farmer field schools
2A2. Farmers innovation network• Support to technical service centre at provincial level• Germplasm collection, seeds production, …• Field days, cross‐visits, peer‐to‐peer farmers & traders exchanges
WP2. Participatory innovation network 2D 2A 2M
LANDSCAPE UNITS
Lowland Rice
Terraces Rice
Residential areas ‐ Gardens Upland crops ForestRiver
Water quality, siltation
Pest pressure, soil fertility, water and labor scarcity…
Diversification of agricultural income
Weed management, soil fertility, erosionAlternatives to burning and/or tillage
Stop deforestation
Main issues
1/26/2016
3
AGRO‐ECOLOGICAL OPTIONS FOR ECO‐FRIENDLY INTENSIFICATION
Lowland Rice
Terraces Rice
Settlement area ‐ Gardens
Pest pressure, soil fertility, water and labor scarcity…
• Fish/duck‐rice production systems• Dry season production cycles• IPM, compost, SRI…
• Diversification• IPM, compost…
River
Water quality, siltation
• Uncultivated buffer zone (5‐10m) • Protection of rivers banks (trees, bamboos, vetiver, grasses…)
River bank protection with Vetiver
Dry season lowland diversification (winter soybean, vegetable…)
IPM/ Bio‐insecticide (Agrisud)
LANDSCAPE UNITS
AGRO‐ECOLOGICAL OPTIONS FOR ECO‐FRIENDLY INTENSIFICATION
Settlement area ‐ Gardens
Diversification of agricultural income
Weed management, soil fertility, erosionAlternatives to burning and/or ploughing
• Crop post‐processing (dryer, silo)• Organic vegetable• Forage plots (cut and carry)• Dry season fodder (silage, urea treatment…)
• Agricultural diversification (frogs, mushrooms, trees, honey…)
…
Rice straw treatment with urea
Forage plot for livestock feeding
Improvement of pig raising conditions
Organic vegetable
Compost
EM production (plant & livestock)
1/26/2016
4
LANDSCAPE UNITS
AGRO‐ECOLOGICAL OPTIONS FOR ECO‐FRIENDLY INTENSIFICATION
Upland crops
Weed management, soil fertility, erosionAlternatives to burning and/or ploughing
• Crops diversification• Improved pasture• Conservation agriculture• Managed/ improved fallows• Agroforestry• Contour hedgerows• Natural vegetative strips…
Intercropping
Direct seeding (CA/SCV)
Diversification with legumes:‐Maize + pigeon pea‐Maize + rice bean‐ Cassava + stylosanthes …
LANDSCAPE UNITS
AGRO‐ECOLOGICAL OPTIONS FOR ECO‐FRIENDLY INTENSIFICATION
Forest
Weed management, soil fertility, erosionAlternatives to burning and/or ploughing
Stop deforestation
• NTFPs• Plantation
NTFPS: bamboo shot, cardamom …
Agroforestry and/or diversification of monospecific plantations…
1/26/2016
5
Experiment Demonstration Training (EDT)
Expe/Demo/Training in few villagesFarmer Field Schools
Diagnosis: Farm typology – Identification of innovative agricultural systems
Expe/Demo/Training in station
LUP zone n°1Controlled tests
Farmers’ Innovation NetworkIncluding other villages
Participatory definition of research objectives and design
Criteria and modalities for assessment
LUP zone n°1Farmers’ tests
LUP zone n°…Controlled tests
LUP zone n°..Farmers’ tests
Controlled tests..
Seed collections..
Farmers validation
Farmers validation
Farmers validation
Farmers validation
Farmers validation
Understand the determinants for
successful adoption of new production systems
Formulate policy recommendations
for agricultural research & extension
Offer technical references & training to extension
services (Lot C of NUDP)
Identify enabling conditions for a
sustainable EDT systemunder multi‐stakeholders’
governance
Process includes all stakeholders: farmers, traders, research, government
Monitoring & Evaluation
Farmers innovation network
Impact Assessment
WP2 – Monitoring
2M1. Participatory evaluation of innovation system performance• Performances of the tested innovations at the plot level (yield, biomass ),• Dissemination of the innovations (GIS‐based monitoring),• Management of the innovation network, governance mechanisms
2M2. Impact analysis of innovative practices on ecosystem services• Changes in soil carbon and biodiversity, etc.• Impacts on resistance , resilience and mitigation to climate change • Monitoring changes in farmers skills and knowledge
WP2. Participatory innovation network 2D 2A 2M
Expected impacts Agroecological mechanisms involved
Resistance to climate change
‐ Increase water infiltration and water holding capacity (soil organic matter and root density),‐ Surface mulch improves soil porosity and increases infiltration and absorption capacity,‐ Reduce the risk of erosion, land slides and flooding during heavy rains,
Resilience to climatic events
‐ Reduced yield fluctuations between dry and wet years compared to conventional farming practices.‐ Reduced negative effects of adverse climatic events through enhanced agricultural biodiversity,‐ Enhanced capacity to cope with the emergence of new pests, weeds and diseases due to global warming.
Climate change mitigation
‐Participatory land use planning contributes to the demarcation of areas dedicated to forest regeneration or reforestation while land use can be intensified in agricultural areas through agro‐ecological practices,‐ Conservation Agriculture facilitates carbon sequestration in the soil .