world ipv6 day ipv6matrix results presentation
DESCRIPTION
Presentation distributed for World IPv6 Day, on 8 June 2011. This contains results for IPv6 dual stack Web sites in April 2011 and compares them with results collected in September 2010.TRANSCRIPT
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 1
IPv6 Matrix Project
Tracking IPv6 connectivity Worldwide
http://www.ipv6matrix.org
Dr. Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond – [email protected] 2011 Update / World IPv6 Day Version / 8 June 2011
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 2
IPv6 Matrix Project
� ISOC England was awarded a Community Grants Programme award in November 2009
� Design and implementation of an “IPv6 Crawler,” software on a computer that crawls through the DNS at regular intervals in order to detect and test:� IPv6 DNS servers
� IPv6 compliant Web servers� IPv6 compliant SMTP mailers
� IPv6 compliant NTP servers.
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 3
Project Rationale
� Today, more than 95% of Internet traffic is generated by a small number of data sources – i.e. the world’s busiest Web Sites
� Without IPv6 accessible content, IPv6 has no chance of being used - ever.
� Take the 1 Million most popular Web site list from alexa.com as a starting point for the domains to be tested. Add more domains later.
� Test them for IPv6 connectivity
� This is equivalent to testing about 6.3 million hosts worldwide
� Use GeoIP database to estimate real host location
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 4
Project Teams
� London, UK:
� Project Management and support
� Hardware supply and installation
� Data Centre and IPv6 connectivity
� Nile University, Egypt:
� Software Programming
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 5
www.ipv6matrix.org Web Site
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 6
What are we tracking?
� Host IPv6 penetration
� Using IPv4 Geo-location coordinates
� Includes generic TLD (gTLDs, .com, .net, .org) and country code ccTLDs
� Two types of information:
� Infrastructure: DNS + Web + E-mail + Time server (NTP)This tracks all of the infrastructure required to run IPv6 Web services
� Web sites only (actual content)This tracks the Web services themselves. Usually this percentage is lower than the figure for the infrastructure
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 7
What are we archiving?
� Everything that we are tracking on the previous page, plus:
� Testing of connectivity to the above services in case IPv6 addresses are advertised but no service runs on them
� Tracing of route from London Docklands to each one of these hosts both using IPv4 and IPv6 – and archiving all of this information in text format
� A lot more data, accessible from the Web site archive
� In April 2011, the size of this database in text format is approx 60Gb and continually increasing (the testing software runs 24/7)
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 8
Europe Data snapshot
� Europe Map + figures
� (Web+NTP / WEB only)
Sept 20104.23%
2.39%
1.34%
1.91% 1.49%
2.20%
4.39%0.74%
0.20%
1.29%
4.29%
2.03%
1.47%
6.68%
3.20%
0.23% 0.56%
0.63%
3.40%
4.34%
0.41%
10.74%0.67%
2.32% 2.80% 3.48%
1.12%
4.88%
1.39% 1.47% 1.38%7.91%
9.00%
8.33%
3.56% 1.69%
2.59%
3.91%
0.59%
13.91%
3.77%
6.36%
0.93%1.65%
11.95%
5.25%
3.01%
0.39% 0.69%
1.81%
3.94%
4.05%
1.34%
13.42%18.91%
2.84%
IPv6 Host Penetration
Infrastructure
- DNS
- Web
- NTP
6.57%
1.74%
8.38%
2.01%
April 2011
Sept 2010
April 2011
Sept 2010Sept 2010
April 2011
Sept 2010
Low Sample
Low accuracy
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 9
Europe Data snapshot
� Europe Map + figures
� (Web+NTP / WEB only)
April 2011
2.29%
0.41%
0.14%
0.24% 0.64%
0.00%
0.99%0.74%
0.06%
0.48%
0.64%
0.47%
0.80%
0.26%
0.84%
0.35% 0.11%
0.10%
2.79%
0.09%
0.12%
4.01%0.42%
0.43% 1.55% 1.73%
0.11%
2.25%
0.30% 0.59% 0.27%1.46%
0.21%
1.69%
0.98% 0.08%
0.20%
0.62%
0.41%
0.74%
1.37%
3.15%
0.42%0.23%
4.13%
0.64%
1.28%
0.50% 0.39%
0.16%
3.21%
0.14%
0.55%
16.38%24.68%
1.33%
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
10.10%
0.30%
11.53%
0.48%
Sept 2010
Low Sample
Low accuracy
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 10
Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change
sept-10 apr-11
Moldova (*) 13.42% 18.91% 5.49%
France 2.39% 13.91% 11.52%
Switzerland 10.74% 11.95% 1.21%
Denmark 6.68% 9.00% 2.32%
Slovakia 6.57% 8.38% 1.81%
Finland 2.03% 8.33% 6.30%
Netherlands 4.39% 7.91% 3.52%
Bosnia and Herzegovina (*) 7.73% 7.73%
Slovenia 6.52% 6.52%
Czech Republic 3.48% 6.36% 2.88%
Croatia 6.36% 6.36%
Austria 2.32% 5.25% 2.93%
Norway 3.20% 4.88% 1.68%
Lithuania 4.34% 4.05% -0.29%
Belarus 3.40% 3.94% 0.54%
Estonia 4.29% 3.91% -0.38%
Portugal 4.23% 3.77% -0.46%
Sweden 1.47% 3.56% 2.09%
Greece 1.34% 3.01% 1.67%
Republic of Macedonia (*) 2.92% 2.92%
Italy 2.80% 2.84% 0.04%
Serbia (*) 2.61% 2.61%
United Kingdom 1.34% 2.59% 1.25%
Hungary 1.74% 2.01% 0.27%
Ukraine 0.63% 1.81% 1.18%
Russia 0.20% 1.69% 1.49%
Poland 1.12% 1.65% 0.53%
Belgium 1.49% 1.47% -0.02%
Ireland 1.91% 1.39% -0.52%
Germany 0.74% 1.38% 0.64%
Iceland 2.20% 1.29% -0.91%
Spain 0.67% 0.93% 0.26%
Romania 0.56% 0.69% 0.13%
Latvia 0.41% 0.59% 0.18%
Bulgaria 0.10% 0.46% 0.36%
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
IPv6 Host Penetration
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 11
Country WEB % change
sept-10 apr-2011
Moldova (*) 16.38% 24.68% 8.30%
Slovakia 10.10% 11.53% 1.43%
Switzerland 4.01% 4.13% 0.12%
Belarus 2.79% 3.21% 0.42%
Czech Republic 1.73% 3.15% 1.42%
Norway 0.84% 2.25% 1.41%
Republic of Macedonia (*) 2.11% 2.11%
Finland 0.47% 1.69% 1.22%
Croatia 1.53% 1.53%
Netherlands 0.99% 1.46% 0.47%
Portugal 2.29% 1.37% -0.92%
Italy 1.55% 1.33% -0.22%
Slovenia 1.28% 1.28%
Greece 0.55% 1.28% 0.73%
Sweden 0.80% 0.98% 0.18%
France 0.41% 0.74% 0.33%
Austria 0.43% 0.64% 0.21%
Estonia 0.64% 0.62% -0.02%
Belgium 0.64% 0.59% -0.05%
Hungary 0.30% 0.48% 0.18%
Iceland 0.00% 0.48% 0.48%
Spain 0.42% 0.42% 0.00%
Lithuania 0.12% 0.41% 0.29%
Romania 0.11% 0.39% 0.28%
Ireland 0.24% 0.30% 0.06%
Germany 0.74% 0.27% -0.47%
Bulgaria 0.10% 0.26% 0.16%
Poland 0.11% 0.23% 0.12%
Denmark 0.26% 0.21% -0.05%
United Kingdom 0.14% 0.20% 0.06%
Ukraine 0.10% 0.16% 0.06%
Latvia 0.09% 0.14% 0.05%
Russia 0.06% 0.08% 0.02%
Bosnia and Herzegovina (*) 0.00% 0.00%
Serbia (*) 0.00% 0.00%
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 12
Europe Trends
� France with large rise in infrastructure
� Likely to be caused by a main hosting
provider, ovh.net, installing dual-stack
Name-servers
� Slovakia and Switzerland leading with
dual-stack Web sites
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 13
Asia Data snapshot
0.20%
0.09%
1.52%2.52%
1.50%
0.39%
0.20%
0.65%
7.38%
8.59%
3.03%3.16%
1.01%
1.31%
0.25%
2.78%
1.89% 0.09%
0.89%
0.56%
1.46%
1.18%
5.40%
1.36%
0.24%
1.69%
0.11%
2.16%
0.24%
1.49%
3.42%
0.09% 2.81%3.24%
1.39%
0.00%
0.65%
2.94%
0.42%
0.56%
1.95%8.54%
3.50%
10.64%
25.00%23.81%
April 2011
Sept 2010
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
IPv6 Host Penetration
Low Sample
Low accuracy
SG: 32.24%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 14
Asia Data snapshot
0.06%
0.11%
0.11%0.42%
1.58%
0.48%
0.18%
0.14%
0.00%
1.94%
3.03%0.52%
0.00%
0.15%
0.09%
3.09%
0.51% 0.00%
0.00%
0.56%
0.87%
1.03%
0.61%
1.01%
0.29%
0.08%
0.12%
1.39%
0.03%
0.17%
3.88%
5.26% 0.18%0.77%
1.23%
0.00%
0.68%
2.94%
0.38%
0.56%
3.70%1.89%
0.55%
0.00%
50.00%50.00%
April 2011
Sept 2010
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
Low Sample
Low accuracy
SG: 0.00%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 15
Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change
sept-11 apr-11
Singapore 0.00% 32.24% 32.24%
Armenia (*) 7.38% 10.64% 3.26%
Sri Lanka (*) 8.59% 8.54% -0.05%
Indonesia 3.16% 5.40% 2.24%
Malaysia 1.89% 3.50% 1.61%
Philippines (*) 2.78% 3.42% 0.64%
New Zealand 2.52% 3.24% 0.72%
Oman (*) 3.03% 2.94% -0.09%
Australia 1.52% 2.81% 1.29%
Hong Kong n/a 2.37%
Taiwan 1.18% 2.16% 0.98%
Qatar (*) 0.89% 1.95% 1.06%
Russia 0.20% 1.69% 1.49%
Japan 1.31% 1.49% 0.18%
Saudi Arabia (*) 1.50% 1.39% -0.11%
Thailand 1.46% 1.36% -0.10%
United Arab Emirates (*) 0.65% 0.65% 0.00%
Pakistan 0.56% 0.56% 0.00%
Iran 0.39% 0.42% 0.03%
South Korea 0.25% 0.24% -0.01%
India 0.20% 0.24% 0.04%
China 0.09% 0.11% 0.02%
Vietnam (*) 0.09% 0.09% 0.00%
Kuwait (*) 1.01% 0.00% -1.01%
IPv6 Host Penetration
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 16
Country WEB % change
sept-10 apr-11
Vietnam (*) 0.00% 5.26% 5.26%
Philippines (*) 3.09% 3.88% 0.79%
Qatar (*) 0.00% 3.70% 3.70%
Oman (*) 3.03% 2.94% -0.09%
Sri Lanka (*) 1.94% 1.89% -0.05%
Taiwan 1.03% 1.39% 0.36%
Saudi Arabia (*) 1.58% 1.23% -0.35%
Thailand 0.87% 1.01% 0.14%
New Zealand 0.42% 0.77% 0.35%
United Arab Emirates (*) 0.14% 0.68% 0.54%
Hong Kong n/a 0.67%
Indonesia 0.52% 0.61% 0.09%
Pakistan 0.56% 0.56% 0.00%
Malaysia 0.51% 0.55% 0.04%
Iran 0.48% 0.38% -0.10%
India 0.18% 0.29% 0.11%
Australia 0.11% 0.18% 0.07%
Japan 0.15% 0.17% 0.02%
China 0.11% 0.12% 0.01%
Russia 0.06% 0.08% 0.02%
South Korea 0.09% 0.03% -0.06%
Singapore 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Armenia (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Kuwait (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 17
Asia Trends
� Singapore leading by far in infrastructure but trailing in dual-stack Web Site content
� China results abnormally very low –content not dual stacked or IPv6 behind firewall?
� Less reliability of results due to smaller sample size in many countries of the region
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 18
Africa Data snapshot
36.63%
8.82%
5.56%
8.33%
0.79%0.81%
8.51%
7.87%
35.62%
8.82%
April 2011
Sept 2010
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
IPv6 Host Penetration
Low Sample
Low accuracy
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 19
Africa Data snapshot
0.00%
0.00%
1.85%
14.29%
0.34%0.29%
14.29%
2.44%
0.00%
0.00%
April 2011
Sept 2010
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
Low Sample
Low accuracy
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 20
Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change
sept-10 apr-11
Tunisia (*) 36.63% 35.62% -1.01%
Senegal (*) 8.82% 8.82% 0.00%
Tanzania (*) 8.33% 8.51% 0.18%
Kenya (*) 5.56% 7.87% 2.31%
South Africa 0.79% 0.81% 0.02%
IPv6 Host Penetration
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
The small number of hosts tested make the results
for most of Africa appear higher than they really are
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 21
Country WEB % change
sept-10 apr-11
Tanzania (*) 14.29% 14.29% 0.00%
Kenya (*) 1.85% 2.44% 0.59%
South Africa 0.34% 0.29% -0.05%
Tunisia (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Senegal (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
The small number of hosts tested make the results
for most of Africa appear higher than they really are
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 22
Africa Trends
� Very few countries with IPv6
connectivity
� Dual Stack Islands starting to appear
� Can be compared with the growth of
Internet connectivity in the nineties
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 23
Compare Historical data on
African Internet Connectivity
June 1994 May 1997
Source: Internetology - http://www.nsrc.org/codes/bymap/ntlgy/ntlgy.htm
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 24
North/South America
0.37%
1.52%0.23%
0.98%
1.40%
April 2011
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
IPv6 Host Penetration
Low Sample
Low accuracy
6.00%
6.09%
8.30%
0.32%
1.95%
PR: 3.51%
0.29%
2.81%
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 25
North/South America
0.61%
1.31%0.23%
0.21%
0.24%
April 2011
IPv6 Host Penetration
Low Sample
Low accuracy
3.23%
2.26%
25%
0.28%
1.80%
PR: 6.67%
Web only
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 26
Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change
sept-10 apr-11
Uruguay (*) 8.30% 8.30%
Venezuela (*) 6.09% 6.09%
Guatemala (*) 6.00% 6.00%
Puerto Rico (*) 3.51% 3.51%
Cuba (*) 2.81% 2.81%
Ecuador (*) 1.95% 1.95%
Brasil 1.52% 1.52%
United States 1.40% 1.40%
Canada 0.98% 0.98%
Mexico 0.37% 0.37%
Chile 0.32% 0.32%
Colombia (*) 0.29% 0.29%
Costa Rica (*) 0.23% 0.23%
For (*) the small number of hosts tested make the results
in many countries appear higher than they really are
IPv6 Host Penetration
Infrastructure
- DNS or
- Web or
- E-mail or
- NTP
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 27
Country WEB % change
sept-10 apr-11
Uruguay (*) 25.00% 25.00%
Puerto Rico (*) 6.67% 6.67%
Guatemala (*) 3.23% 3.23%
Venezuela (*) 2.26% 2.26%
Ecuador (*) 1.80% 1.80%
Brasil 1.31% 1.31%
Mexico 0.61% 0.61%
Chile 0.28% 0.28%
United States 0.24% 0.24%
Costa Rica (*) 0.23% 0.23%
Canada 0.21% 0.21%
Cuba (*) 0.00% 0.00%
Colombia (*) 0.00% 0.00%
For (*) the small number of hosts tested make the results
in many countries appear higher than they really are
IPv6 Host Penetration
Web only
(*) Low Sample
Low accuracy
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 28
America Trends
� North America trailing behind Europe
� Elsewhere, data based on low number
of Web sites, needs to be taken in
moderation (the restricted number of
hosting providers can make figures
jump several percentage points)
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 29
Worldwide Trends
� We are seeing a slow growth in dual stack IPv4-IPv6 implementation
� The figures are still very small
� There is a small decrease in percentage in some countries, which would point to unstable peering agreements (the IPv6 network is less closely meshed than the IPv4 network)
� Bearing in mind the Asia Pacific Regional Internet Registry has run out of IPv4 addresses, it is alarming to see so few Web sites up and running IPv6 in that region.
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 30
Future work / funding required
� Add more domains to be tested
� Add more features to be tested
� Current front end Web Pages are only an example of possible analysis
� Develop new data visualisation
� Perform further analysis
� Perform historical/time analysis from archives
� Develop an engine to write automated reports
� Duplicate Crawler to other regions
IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.orgPage 31
Thank you
CTMInternational
Contact: ISOC England – [email protected]