world bank document€¦ · b. project status the pdo is to improve nutrition practices targeted to...

Document of

The World Bank

Report No: 107534-TP

RESTRUCTURING PAPER

ON A

PROPOSED PROJECT RESTRUCTURING

OF

COMMUNITY DRIVEN NUTRITION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

TRUST FUND TF017708

Date of Board Approval: May 16, 2014

TO THE

CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES IN THE REPUBLIC OF TIMOR LESTE

Date of Restructuring: August 31, 2016

Regional Vice President: Victoria Kwakwa

Acting Country Director: Mona Sur

Senior Global Practice Director: Timothy Evans

Practice Manager: Toomas Palu

Task Team Leader: Eileen Brainne Sullivan

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

1

ACRONYMS

CAP Community Action Plan

CRS Catholic Relief Services

DHS Demographic Health Survey

IP Implementation Progress

JICA Japanese International Cooperation Agency

JSDF Japanese Social Development Fund

MAF Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries

MEAL Monitoring Evaluation Accountability and Learning

MOH Ministry of Health

NGO Non-Governmental Organization

PDO Project Development Objective

2

DATA SHEET

Timor-Leste

Community Driven Nutrition Improvement (P145491)

EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC

Health, Nutrition & Population .

Report No: RES24897 .

Basic Information

Project ID: P145491 Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan

Regional Vice President: Victoria Kwakwa Original EA Category: Partial Assessment (B)

Country Director: Mona Sur (Acting) Current EA Category: Partial Assessment (B)

Senior Global Practice

Director: Timothy Evans Original Approval Date: 16-May-2014

Practice

Manager/Manager: Toomas Palu Current Closing Date: 31-Aug-2017

Team Leader(s): Eileen Brainne Sullivan .

Borrower: Catholic Relief Services

Responsible

Agency: Catholic Relief Services

.

Restructuring Type

Decision Authority: Country Director

Restructuring Level: II .

Financing ( as of 08-Aug-2016 )

Key Dates

Project TF Status Approval

Date Signing Date

Effectiveness

Date

Original

Closing Date

Revised

Closing Date

P145491 TF-17708 Effective 17-Jul-2014 12-Aug-2014 12-Aug-2014 31-Aug-2017 31-Aug-2017

Disbursements (in Millions)

Project TF Status Currency Original Revised Cancelle

d

Disburse

d

Undisbur

sed

%

Disburse

d

P145491 TF-17708 Effective USD 2.85 2.85 0.00 0.99 1.86 35 .

Policy Waivers

Does the project depart from the CPF in content or in other significant

respects? Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Does the project require any policy waiver(s)? Yes [ ] No [ X ] .

3

A. Summary of Proposed Changes

Change in Implementing Agency Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Change in Project's Development Objectives Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Change in Results Framework Yes [ X ] No [ ]

Change in Safeguard Policies Triggered Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Change of EA category Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Other Changes to Safeguards Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Change in Legal Covenants Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Change in Loan Closing Date(s) Yes [ X ] No [ ]

Cancellations Proposed Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Change to Financing Plan Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Change in Disbursement Arrangements Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Reallocation between Disbursement Categories Yes [ X ] No [ ]

Change in Disbursement Estimates Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Change to Components and Cost Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Change in Institutional Arrangements Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Change in Financial Management Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Change in Procurement Yes [ ] No [ X ]

Change in Implementation Schedule Yes [ X ] No [ ]

Other Change(s) Yes [ ] No [ X ] .

B. Project Status

The PDO is to improve nutrition practices targeted to children under the age of two and pregnant and

lactating women in targeted least developed communities and is expected to be met. Community

Mobilization, Awareness Raising and Participatory Planning has taken place in all sucos (48/50). The last

two sucos are waiting to see progress before they agree to participate in the project. Community Action

Plans were completed by mid-November 2015. Registration of beneficiaries followed in December 2015

and was finalized in March 2016. Delays were incurred in this process due to political tensions that

occurred for about 3-4 months where the project staff could not travel to the sub-districts of Laga, Baguia

and to a lesser extent Quelikai sub-district. The project is working in difficult to reach districts/sub-

districts, but also areas where volatile situations may arise due to political conflicts. Disbursements have

been low as the implementing agency, the Catholic Relief Services (CRS), has funded as planned a number

of activities under Component 1. The socialization of the project and Community Action Plans (CAP)

were completed. The CAP exercise was well received as it built on ownership of communities identifying

their issues/challenges and solutions through the problem/solution tree analysis. Component 1 activities

are now fully completed (mapping of household, participatory rural appraisals, suco council and

beneficiary meetings, and community action plans).

In order to make behavior change more effective, CRS is implementing Components 2 and 3 (Nutrition

and Agriculture) simultaneously. This is based on observations that upon hearing messages about nutrition,

beneficiaries will be more engaged and more likely to change behavior if they have access to the

4

vegetable, protein and root crops they are learning about. Activities commenced, but were initially

delayed due the “El Nino” affecting Timor-Leste, particularly in the intervention sites (east of the country),

resulting in a late planting season. Community facilitation and nutrition education has been ongoing for

several months and planting of orange-flesh sweet potatoes was done four months ago with the first batch

available now in the community gardens. CRS has established very good relations with the municipal

authorities including the Municipal Health Services and the Municipal Agriculture Services. Further

consultation/coordination will be needed, in particular, working with the government’s Saude da Familia

program whereby a medical team of a doctor, nurse, midwife register all households and individuals, and

increase preventive and promotive care through the primary health care system, so that they are able to

respond to the questions communities may have on general health related issues. .

Development Objectives/Results

Project Development Objectives

Original PDO

The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve nutrition practices targeted to children under the

age of two and pregnant and lactating women in targeted least developed communities.

Change in Project's Development Objectives: N/A

5

CONTENTS

I. SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 6

II. PROJECT STATUS .............................................................................................................. 6

III. PROPOSED CHANGE ........................................................................................................ 8

6

RESTRUCTING PAPER

I. SUMMARY

1. The proposed changes are to extend the project closing date, through a no-cost

extension, for one additional year from August 31, 2017 to August 31, 2018. This would

extend the implementation period to four years, which is permitted under the Japanese

Social Development Fund (JSDF) Program. The results framework is being revised to be

clearer in definitions, and to reflect the baseline survey outcomes. Reallocation of funds

under the Grant Agreement categories of expenditure are also being requested due to

increased depth of activities for components 2 and 3 in particular.

II. PROJECT STATUS

1. The PDO is to improve nutrition practices targeted to children under the age of

two and pregnant and lactating women in targeted least developed communities and is

expected to be met. Community Mobilization, Awareness Raising and Participatory

Planning has taken place in all sucos (48/50). The last two sucos are waiting to see progress

before they agree to participate in the project. Community Action Plans were completed

by mid-November 2015. Registration of beneficiaries followed in December 2015 and was

finalized in March 2016. Delays were incurred in this process due to political tensions that

occurred for about 3-4 months where the project staff could not travel to the sub-districts

of Laga, Baguia and to a lesser extent Quelikai sub-district. The project is working in

difficult to reach districts/sub-districts, but also areas where volatile situations may arise

due to political conflicts. Disbursements have been low as the implementing agency, the

Catholic Relief Services (CRS), has funded as planned a number of activities under

Component 1. The socialization of the project and Community Action Plans (CAP) were

completed. The CAP exercise was well received as it built on ownership of communities

identifying their issues/challenges and solutions through the problem/solution tree analysis.

Component 1 activities are now fully completed (mapping of household, participatory rural

appraisals, suco council and beneficiary meetings, and community action plans).

2. In order to make behavior change more effective, CRS is implementing

Components 2 and 3 (Nutrition and Agriculture) simultaneously. This is based on

observations that upon hearing messages about nutrition, beneficiaries will be more

engaged and more likely to change behavior if they have access to the vegetable, protein

and root crops they are learning about. Activities commenced, but were initially delayed

due the “El Nino” affecting Timor-Leste, particularly in the intervention sites (east of the

country), resulting in a late planting season. Community facilitation and nutrition education

has been ongoing for several months and planting of orange-flesh sweet potatoes was done

four months ago with the first batch available now in the community gardens. CRS has

established very good relations with the municipal authorities including the Municipal

Health Services and the Municipal Agriculture Services. Further consultation/coordination

will be needed, in particular, working with the government’s Saude da Familia program

whereby a medical team of a doctor, nurse, midwife register all households and individuals,

and increase preventive and promotive care through the primary health care system, and

that they may respond to the questions communities may have on general health related

issues.

7

3. Disbursements will increase under the grant as implementation proceeds for

Components 2 and 3. The project is currently rated Moderately Satisfactory for both PDO

and Implementation Progress (IP). There are no overdue audits, and the audit report

received was unqualified.

4. CRS is very much committed to the project and to the outputs of this grant, and has

supplemented with their own funds to bolster quality outputs given the limitations of the

JSDF budget, especially on the baseline study (which they financed). The survey shows

that a reasonable level of knowledge and understanding exists of nutrition-specific

behaviours, as well as other aspects of maternal and child health and health care.

Behaviour, however, suggests significant gaps in understanding and/or ability to

implement that knowledge. A major factor causing the difficulties with achieving nutritious

food intake for mothers and young children originates with constraints to the supply of

these foods, underlying the relevance of the project. Key elements of the baseline study

highlighted improvements in the two districts compared to the national indicator (example

is exclusive breastfeeding which has a national baseline of 52% (DHS 2010), while the

project areas have a 71.3% rate (Baseline Survey CRS 2015)). The indicator relating to

treatment of children with diarrhoea shows relatively good awareness with some scope for

improvement. A very small proportion (15%) of mothers are consuming the required

amount of iron-rich food. This is consistent with the lack of dietary diversity revealed in

the indicator for young children, and suggests scope for rapid improvement with the design

of nutrition-specific intervention. Therefore the project indicators will be modified which

is part of this extension request.

5. During 2015, the local non-governmental organizations (NGOs) received training

on Monitoring Evaluation Accountability and Learning (MEAL) and on how best to work

at the community level, including data gathering for the project and the information

flowing from the community up to the partner organizations to be recorded in the database.

Additionally, reporting mechanisms, transparency and accountability mechanisms were

discussed and field testing of data collection forms conducted with the Partner

organizations. Accompaniment of partner organizations to obtain accurate data from the

community is an ongoing process.

6. The project’s collaboration and coordination with Ministry of Health (MOH) and

Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (MAF) at national, district, sub-district and suco level

starting with the early stage socialization of the nutrition project increased the involvement

of the relevant national, district and sub-district staff. From this socialization phase the

project was well received from all levels up to community level authorities and full

collaboration has been established.

7. The participation from CRS staff in national and district level nutrition meetings,

as well as the Cross-Sectoral Working Group (KONSSANTIL) and harmonization

meetings has also had benefits. Furthermore, through sharing experiences in these working

group meetings the project gets more buy-in from staff in the agriculture and health

services and promotes synergies.

8

III. PROPOSED CHANGES

8. The JSDF grant allows for a four-year implementation period, and given the current

context and circumstances outlined above, including implementation delays due to more

intensive socialization required for the project and necessary recruitment of consultants,

the request is to extend the project by one year, from August 31, 2017 to August 31,

2018. This is a no-cost extension. In order to accelerate implementation, the nutrition

specific and nutrition sensitive activities will be implemented in parallel given the delayed

rainy season and the need to respond to community expectations. As this is also an El Niño

year, there is a need to quickly move on the nutrition sensitive activities to counter the

effects of El Niño.

9. The results framework is being revised to bring further specificity and clarity, as

well as the addition of indicators to better track progress. Certain indicators have been

removed as repetitive. In addition, following the baseline survey, there is a need to reflect

the district outcomes from that survey to the result framework (see in annex with the

column that identifies those indicators that were added/deleted/changed).

10. A reallocation of funds under the Grant Agreement categories of expenditure is

being requested due to increased depth of activities for components 2 and 3 in particular.

This is due to a shift in the implementation approach to carry out in parallel both

Components 2 and 3 and meet the challenges described above with the delayed planting

season. A portion of funds under Part I of the project (Component 1) will now shift to

Parts II and III (Components 2 and 3), as CRS undertook extensive training of the local

partners, and development of training material, which they did in-house. In addition,

project start-up costs were covered by CRS, using their regional experts to develop a solid

foundation for the project and its design. Certain goods were deemed not needed and not

procured reducing the goods category under Part I. In addition to the slow implementation

on recruitment of consultants (nutrition and agriculture officers), the advent of an El Niño

year, the community training is being done in tandem for Parts 2 and 3 of the project to

align the information and behavior change elements with the implementation of the

nutrition-sensitive activities. Therefore funds are reallocated from Part I to Part II to

intensify training and implementation of the nutrition-specific activities in the

communities, increasing nutrition promotional education to communities from 50 to 350

groups, and addressing clean water through the addition of water filters. Part III will see

increased efficiencies by using inputs under another CRS project (provision of silos funded

under another CRS project can benefit the project communities), and the addition of

strengthening aquaculture options. CRS funded the project baseline as the budget under

the grant was insufficient to cover the quality, depth and scope. Part IV (a) and (b) has

increased slightly to intensify and reinforce training on M&E to local partners and

communities. In addition, the increase is due to the actual cost for the project audit and

inclusion of local compliance officer to improve capacity of NGO reporting/compliance.

11. Proceeds for Timor-Leste, Community Driven Nutrition Improvement Project,

P145491/TF018010 will be reallocated as follow:

Category of Expenditure Allocation (US Dollars) % of

Financing

9

Current (no change) Current Revised Current (no

change)

(1) Goods, Non-consulting

services, Consultants’ services,

Training and Workshops for Part 1

of the Project

602,000 434,000

100




of the Project

786,000 1,135,000 100




of the Project

1,018,000 794,000 100

(4) (a) Consultants’ services and

Training for Part 4(a) of the

Project.

148,000

184,500

100

(b) Consultants’ services and

Operating Costs for Part (4b)

of the Project.

296,000

302,500 100

TOTAL 2,850,000 2,850,000

ANNEX 1

Revised Results Framework

Comments

(January 2016)

YR 1

Aug 2014 -

July 2015

YR 2

Aug 2015 -

July 2016

YR3

Aug 2016 -

July 2017

YR4- End of

Project Target

Aug 2017 -

May 2018

Indicator One: Proportion of children 0 -

5 months of age who are exclusively

breastfed

No

Change

52%

(DHS

2009/10)

71.3% -- -- -- 75% Baseline & Endline Household

Survey

Questionnaire

Baseline & Endline

Consultant(s)

The original end of project target (60%) has been revised

upward based on the project baseline findings.

Indicator Two (Minimum Acceptable

Diet): Proportion of children 6-23

months provided with all 3 minimum

infant and young child feeding practices

No

Change

30%

(DHS

2009/10)

Breastfed:

3.1%;

Non-

Breastfed

0%

-- -- -- Breastfed:

3.25%;

(5% increase

over baseline)

Non-

breastfed:

Baseline & Endline Household

Survey

Questionnaire

Baseline & Endline

Consultant


downard based on the project baseline findings.

This is a composite indicator reflecting continued

breastfeeding, dietary diversity and meal frequency. Low levels

of minimum dietary diversity (6.48%) is the primary driver

behind the low baseline value of this indicator.Indicator Three: Proportion of children

under two years with diarrhea who are

provided continued feeding along with

ORS and/or increased fluids.

No

Change

63%

(DHS

2009/10)

53.8% -- -- -- 59%

(10% increase

over baseline)

Baseline & Endline Household

Survey

Questionnaire

Baseline & Endline

Consultant


downward based on the project baseline findings.

Indicator Four: Proportion of mothers

of children under two years of age who

consumed iron-rich foods

No

Change

53%

(DHS

2009/10)

15.4% -- -- -- 20.0% Baseline & Endline Household

survey

questionnaire (24

hour food recall)

Baseline & Endline

Consultant


downward based on the project baseline findings.

Project Development Objective (PDO): Improve nutrition practices targeted to children under the age of two and pregnant and lactating women in targeted least developed communities of

Timor-Leste

PDO Level Results IndicatorsDHS

Baseline

Frequency and

reports

Responsibility for

Data Collection

Baseline and Endline PDO Target Values

(Year 1 and Year 4)

The project has suffered a one year delay. Proposed revisions to

project targets are influenced by the delay and/or from findings

from the CDNIP baseline study completed in October 2015.

Detailed explanations of proposed revisions are provided

against each of the indicators below.

The variations seen between DHS values for PDO-level

indicators and the values found in the CDNIP baseline study are

due to variations in the sampling frame and sample size used

for the two studies. The DHS values referenced in this table are

for a random sample taken from the whole of Timor-Leste,

while the CDNIP baseline is a random sample of only

communities targeted by the project. Moreover, since CDNIP

has intentionally targeted the least developed sucos in Baucau

and Viqueque—rather than a random sample from the whole of

the two districts—lower levels of some of the key IYCF and

maternal nutrition practices are not surprising. It is also worth

noting that the equivalent DHS samples from Baucau and

Project

Baseline

Data Collection

InstrumentsRevision

11

Year 1

annual

target

(Aug '14 -

Jul '15)

Year 2

annual

target

(Aug '15 -

July '16)

Year 3

annual

target (Aug

'16 - July

'17)

Year 4

annual

target

(Aug '17 -

May '18)

End of Project

Target

(Cumulative)

Intermediate Result (Component One): Community Mobilization, Awareness Raising and Participatory Planning

Intermediate Result indicator 1.1 :

Number of targeted communities

where a PRA is conducted by second

year.

Revised 0 36 200 N/A N/A 200 Semi-annual until

complete

PRA Summary

Report

MEAL Officer; CNC;

AC

Revision is not by end of project but by second year of project.

Indicator has been met.


Number of community-led action plans

for nutrition interventions (Component

2 and 3) available by project year 2.

No

Change

0 36 200 0 0 200 Semi-annual until

complete

Meeting report

(Annex - copy of

updated action

plans including

nutrition

sensitive

interventions)

MEAL Officer; CNC;

AC

Indicator has been met.


Number of communities that complete

the conditions for graduating to

component 3 by end of project.

Deleted 0 0 0 0 0 0 Semi-annual until

complete

Record Review:

• List of

community maps

completed

• Aldeia PRA

Report

• List of CNFs

• Learning

Session Tracking

Sheet with

participant list

• Meeting report

(Annex - copy of

updated action

plan)

M&E Officer; CNC,

AC

Components 2 and 3 running in parallel for greater impact so

this indicator is deleted.

Intermediate Result Indicator 2.1:

Number of curriculum/manual for

training of trainers (ToTs) with training

plan that are finalized by the end of

project year 2.

Deleted 0 0 0 0 0 0 once Completed

Manual

Program Manager Process indicator deleted as this element will be an integral

part of the IRI 2.2 and 2.3.

Intermediate Result Indicator 2.2 :

Number of Community Nutrition

Coordinators trained as trainers

(Training of Trainers) by end of project.

Revised 0 0 0 18 0 18 Annually Training report

with participant

list

Program Manager,

M&E Officer

Target changed from 17 to 18 to reflect increase requirement to

cover the target communities. Shift from year 2 to year 3.



Facilitators trained by Community

Nutrition Coordinators per annum.

Revised 0 0 0 350 350 350 annually Training report

with participants

list

M&E Officer, CNC Target of "500" changed to 350 as this is based on the number of

mothers in the Mother's Group. This may be increased based on

the increase of mother's joining and need for Community

Nutrition Facilitators to meet the increase.



Facilitator Learning Sessions conducted

by the end of the project.

Revised 0 0 147 392 294 833 Monthly

CNF Training

Attendance

Sheet

M&E Officer, CNC Annual targets revised based on the increase in community

learning sessions. Data collection instrument modified.


Percent of mothers / caretakers

attending small group sessions or

received home visit by end of project.

Revised 0 0% 0 50% 70% 70% Ongoing, compiled

monthly

CNF Mother &

Child Form, CNC

HH Register &

Tracking Sheet

M&E Officer, CNC,

CNF

Annual targets shifted from year 2 to years 3 and 4. Data

collection instrument modified. Change in indicator wording

from "Percent of targeted households receive counselling

either via home visits or small group sessions by end of project"

to "Percent of mothers / caretakers attending small group

sessions or received homevisit by end of project".

Intermediate Result (Component Two): Community Led Delivery of Nutrition Specific Interventions

Comments

(January 2016)

Project Targets

Responsible for

Data Collection

INTERMEDIATE RESULTS

Frequency and

reports

Data Collection

InstrumentsIR-level Results Indicators

Project

Baseline

12

Year 1

annual

target

(Aug '14 -

Jul '15)

Year 2

annual

target

(Aug '15 -

July '16)

Year 3

annual

target

(Aug'16 -

July '17)

Year 4

annual

target

(Aug '17 -

May '18)

End of Project

Target

(Cumulative)


Percentage of children 0 - 5 months of

age who are exclusively breastfed in

the previous 24 hours.

Deleted 71.3% 71.3% 74% 75% 75% Year 2: Baseline

(Oct 2015); Year 3:

Sept/Oct 2016 ;

July 2017;

Year 4: Endline

CNC household

progress

questionnaire

(LQAS survey)

Baseline &

Endline HH

survey

M&E Officer, CNC This is reflected in the PDO indicators.


Progress Toward Minimum Dietary

Diversity: Proportion of children 6 - 23

months who received food from three

or more food groups in the previous 24

hours.

Deleted 30% 30% 33% 35% 35% Year 2: Baseline

(Oct 2015); Year 3:

Sept/Oct 2016 ;

July 2017;

Year 4: Endline

CNC household

progress

questionnaire

(LQAS survey)

Baseline &

Endline HH

survey

MEAL Officer, CNC Very low levels of minimum dietary diversity assessed at

baseline (6.48%), and DPO Indicator 2 will be what is monitored.


Percentage of children 0 - 23 months of

age with diarrhea who were given

continued feeding along with ORS or

increased fluids.

Revised 53.8% 53.8% 57.5% 59% 59% Year 2: Baseline

(Oct 2015); Year 3:

Sept/Oct 2016 ;

July 2017;

Year 4: Endline

CNC household

progress

questionnaire

(LQAS survey)

Baseline &

Endline HH

survey

M&E Officer, CNC Targets added based on baseline study findings. Delays in

implementation mean that year 2 uses baseline data. Yearly

data collection will be from CNC household progress

questionnaire; Endline survey will be in year 4.


Percentage of mothers of children 0 - 23

months of age who reporting

consuming iron-rich food in the

previous 24 hours.

Revised 15.4% 15.4% 18% 20% 20.0% Year 2: Baseline

(Oct 2015); Year 3:

Sept/Oct 2016 ;

July 2017;

Year 4: Endline

CNC household

progress

questionnaire

(LQAS survey)

Baseline &

Endline HH

survey

M&E Officer, CNC Targets added based on baseline study findings. Delays in

implementation mean that year 2 uses baseline data. Yearly

data collection will be from CNC household progress

questionnaire; Endline survey will be in year 4.

Project

Baseline

Frequency and

reports

Data Collection

Instruments

Responsible for

Data Collection

Project Targets

IR-level Results Indicators


Comments

(January 2016)

13

Year 1

annual

target

(Aug '14 -

Jul '15)

Year 2

annual

target

(Aug '15 -

July '16)

Year 3

annual

target

(Aug'16 -

July '17)

Year 4

annual

target

(Aug '17 -

May '18)

End of Project

Target

(Cumulative)


Number of guidelines including

technical specifications for each option

of component 3 interventions available

by year 3

Deleted 0 0 0 0 0 0 Once Copy of

completed

guidelines

Program Manager Process indicator deleted as this element will be an integral

part of the IRI 3.2 and 3.3.


Percentage of trained household

representatives practicing one or more

of the recommended planting to post-

harvest practices for the production of

nutritious staple and minor crops by

end of project.

Revised 0 80% 80% 0% 80% Ongoing in years 2

and 3 during

periods of sweet

potato cultivation

Sweet Potato

Tracking Sheet

AC Year targets established; data collection instruments revised.


Percentage of target households

producing vegetables through

homestead gardens by the end of

project.

Revised 0 60% 70% 70% Ongoing from year

2

AC HH Tracking

Sheet

AC Year targets established; data collection instruments revised.


Percentage of target households with

established homestead protein

production by end of project.

Revised 0 60% 70% 70% Ongoing from year

2

AC HH Tracking

Sheet

AC Indicator statement revised from "fish" to "protein". This

revision is based on the expansion of option 3 from only fish

production to multiple protein production options including

chickens or high protein crops. Year targets established; data

collection instruments revised.

Intermediate Result (Component Three): Community Led Delivery of Nutrition-sensitive Interventions

Responsible for

Data Collection

Project Targets

IR-level Results IndicatorsProject

Baseline

Frequency and

reports

Data Collection

Instruments


Comments

(January 2016)

world bank document€¦ · b. project status the pdo is to improve nutrition practices targeted to...

Documents