workshop ii: annual departmental planning—assessment planning

17
Workshop II: Annual Departmental Planning—Assessment Planning

Upload: audra-vivian-mcdaniel

Post on 18-Jan-2016

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Workshop II: Annual Departmental Planning—Assessment Planning

Workshop II: Annual Departmental

Planning—Assessment Planning

Page 2: Workshop II: Annual Departmental Planning—Assessment Planning

Workshop Learning Objective:

• how to track, evaluate, and report progress on departmental goals:  

– how to set success standards (“measures”), record associated budget requests, record actions taken and results, analyze results, record improvements and recommendations for the future, and record budget implications for the future 

(Please note that the screen shots contained in this presentation vary slightly with what you will currently find in Tk20)

Page 3: Workshop II: Annual Departmental Planning—Assessment Planning

Please note:

On the new assessment framework, AES outcomes assessment activity (4-semester cycle)

has been merged into the annual planning process.

As in the past, AES unit leaders and academic department chairs are responsible for this annual

planning process.

Page 4: Workshop II: Annual Departmental Planning—Assessment Planning

Please also note that assessment of student learning goals will be treated at more length in a

separate workshop;

this workshop will focus on departmental operational planning and goals.

Page 5: Workshop II: Annual Departmental Planning—Assessment Planning

Evaluating progress on annual goals: the core

Page 6: Workshop II: Annual Departmental Planning—Assessment Planning

Bergen Terms and Tk20 Terms:

Means of Assessment (BCC) = Measure (Tk20)

Criterion for success (BCC) = Measure (build into Measure) (Tk20)

So, “measure” = means of assessment + criteria for success

Measure = how you know the goal has been met

Page 7: Workshop II: Annual Departmental Planning—Assessment Planning

On Measures:

• Multiple measures (both direct and indirect) make for more reliable assessment

• Measures should be observable• Measures should normally pertain to outcomes, rather

than processes• Some quantitative measures are normally appropriate;

may involve rubrics, counts, percentages, etc.• Supporting documents (e.g., assessment instruments)

can be uploaded in the Analysis tab• A target level of achievement is normally appropriate

Page 8: Workshop II: Annual Departmental Planning—Assessment Planning

Measures—top of the screen

Each outcome may have one or multiple measures. The measure is

created in the assessment plan, then results of each measure are entered

in the ‘Data Collection Form.’

Page 9: Workshop II: Annual Departmental Planning—Assessment Planning

Budget Request:

Within the Measures tab, you have the ability to make a budget request to support the

implementation of your goal.

Page 10: Workshop II: Annual Departmental Planning—Assessment Planning

Budget Request:

• Select the relevant fiscal year on the drop-down menu.

• Click on “Add New” to input the request.• Under “Purpose,” briefly explain how the request

supports the goal being tracked. • If you fund the goal with funds already allocated

to your department for a different purpose, input the amount in “Amount received” with the word ‘released’ next to it in parentheses.

Example: 500.00 (released)

Page 11: Workshop II: Annual Departmental Planning—Assessment Planning

Data Collection Form (Assessment Results)

The table entry allows for results to be entered at multiple intervals

A comment box can also be included for additional descriptions.

We can also add a browse button to allow additional data to be uploaded.

Page 12: Workshop II: Annual Departmental Planning—Assessment Planning

Results Form

Page 13: Workshop II: Annual Departmental Planning—Assessment Planning

Analysis Form

Page 14: Workshop II: Annual Departmental Planning—Assessment Planning

Good assessment tip:

In the Analysis section, focus on WHY the goal WAS met, or WASN’T met.

What actions, processes, or methods made the implementation successful?

What obstacles, events, or conditions prohibited achievement of the goal?

(Leave the recommendations for later!)

Page 15: Workshop II: Annual Departmental Planning—Assessment Planning

Recommendations

Page 16: Workshop II: Annual Departmental Planning—Assessment Planning

Recommendations – Budget Implications

Page 17: Workshop II: Annual Departmental Planning—Assessment Planning

Actions

The Actions section allows a place to indicate what improvements were made for

this assessment period in order to achieve the desired outcome. (Changes Implemented)