workshop held at eating disorders alpbach 2013, the 21st … · 2019-11-26 · a characteristic...
TRANSCRIPT
Workshop held at Eating Disorders Alpbach 2013,
The 21st International Conference,
October 17-19, 2013
Interventions to improve eating
disorder health literacy in order
to reduce community burden. Phillipa Hay
School
of Medicine & Centre for
Health Research
Workshop Outline:
Theme ‘The treatment gap’ and how
to close it
• What contributes to it? - the role of eating
disorder mental health literacy
• Can it be reduced?
–our experience with targeted prevention
–professionals and people with an ED
• A new paradigm – integrated programs
addressing weight disorder and body
dissatisfaction
We know that
• There are effective treatments for common eating disorders (EDs) such as bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder
• Interventions, especially cognitive behavioural therapy need not be intensive and/or delivered by specialists
Hay P IJED May 2013 open access
Hay PJ, et al. Psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa and
binging. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 4.
We also know that
Eating disorders (EDs) in the
community are associated
with high burden and poor
health related quality of life
Studies of burden
Reviews support an eating disorder having a substantial impact on individual’s Health Related Quality of Life, in the mental health domain, i.e. their mental health limiting people in being able to do usual activities
• that remains when controlling for weight
• that is as severe or more severe than levels found in other major disorders such as major depression or ischaemic heart disease - Jenkins et al., (2011) Clinical Psychology Review
31: 113–12;1 Hay & Mond (2005)J Ment Health 14: 539-552.
And quality of like has also found
to be poor in..
• community women with body dissatisfaction without an eating disorder
–Mond et al 2013 BMC Public Health,
• community men & women with disordered eating behaviours
– Mitchison et al., 2012 PLOSOne
Despite impairment in
health related quality of life
very few people with an
eating disorder are accessing
effective treatments
Hart et al Clin Psychol Rev 2011
• Systematic review n=1 4 studies
• Pooled prevalence of treatment
seeking: 23.2% (95% CI=16.6, 31.4).
• Cases more likely to receive
treatment for weight loss than for
eating problem.
Many putative causes of the
Treatment Gap • Stigma, belief in self-reliance/self-help
• Lack of information & resources
• Accessibility including
– Cost to the patient
– Cost to the service – rationing
• Fear of change: “I was afraid of weight gain”
• Hepworth & Paxton , 2007, Cachelin & Striegel-Moore, 2006, Becker et al. 2004
And ?
Poor eating disorder
health literacy
Jorm 2007: “knowledge and beliefs about mental disorders that may aid in
their recognition, management and treatment”.
Views from:
community
men & women
practice attendees
clinicians:
doctors, psychologists, counsellors,
dietitians
presented with BN, AN, BED, EDNOS
vignettes
Australian studies of ED ‘health
literacy’
Consistent findings:
• Weight and desire to lose weight takes primacy
• A favourable regard for the weight control strategies of EDs
• Stigma and perceived discrimination is high
• Pessimism about treatment outcomes
• Low regard for ‘evidence-based’ Rχs – Exception CBT BN, BWLR χ BED
Contrasts better knowledge and
recognition in UK psychiatrists
although confidence to provide
treatment was limited
Jones et al (2013)
European Eating Disorders Review 21:
84–88
Solutions:
Taking treatment to the
sufferer – some
Australian developments
• Mental health first aid
• Training the non-specialist
• Online accessible help
Mental health first aid for
eating disorders: pilot
evaluation of a training
program for the public
Hart et al. BMC Psychiatry 2012, 12:98
Pilot evaluation with 6 month follow-
up
• 73 Students and staff university
residencies
• Improved recognition of bulimia nervosa
• Little change attitudes but already
empathetic
• Increased confidence in providing help
but no change in amount or type of help
provided
CEDD Online Learning Program for the non- specialist Cedd.org.au
highly interactive online course, using expert videos, role-plays, interactive exercises and quizzes.
provide a comprehensive training in the medical, psychological and dietetic management of eating disorders.
flexible learning format allows for the tailoring of the learning experience to a basic or more challenging level.
Five modules covering skills required in
each step of the diagnosis, assessment and
treatment of clients, for both children and
adults, across all major eating disorder
diagnoses Each with a Core curriculum, required to pass the
quiz, an ’In Practice’ section offering a more in-depth
view of the topic and clinical tools, and a Resources
section
Evaluation promising, well-received, but
few complete all modules?
Structure – Maguire et al.
“Smart eating” online program
Leung et al. Journal of Eating Disorders
2013
1. Browse through the information on healthy eating
2. Solicit support from family members to overcome an eating disorder, and ask them to view the information about family education
3. Complete all health assessment questionnaires at baseline
4. Work through the worksheets on motivational enhancement
5. Follow the steps in the self-help strategies to overcome eating disorders
6. Use different strategies to promote psychological health
7. Complete all health assessment questionnaires again at 1, 3- and 6-month follow-up intervals to monitor personal progress
Our question
Do these strategies close the
treatment gap?
Women’s Eating Health and
Lifestyle (WEHL) studies
21
We sought to evaluate impact of a
GP Education group on their patients
• Education session run by a GP who was part of
the research group
• Well attended & well received
• Done at time of regular lunchtime meeting
• All GPs given GP guide
22
A GP’s Guide to
Common Eating
Disorders. Anita Star
23
DSM-IV Diagnostic Criteria for AN
What is Anorexia Nervosa (AN), Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and
Eating Disorders Not otherwise Specified (EDNOS)?
The distinguishing feature of AN is a marked loss of weight due to extreme dietary restriction. Medical complications,
including loss of menstruation, are a consequence of severe weight loss and may be life-threatening. While Anorexia
Nervosa (AN) tends to attract the most media attention, this disorder is uncommon (less than 0.5% of women) and affects
primarily adolescent girls.
1. Refusal to maintain body weight at or above a minimally normal weight for age and height (e.g., weight
loss leading to maintenance of body weight less than 85% of that expected; or failure to make expected
weight gain during period of growth, leading to body weight less than 85% of that expected).
• Intense fear of gaining weight or becoming fat, even though underweight.
• Disturbance in the way in which one's body weight or shape is experienced, undue influence of body
weight or shape on self-evaluation, or denial of the seriousness of the current low body weight.
• In postmenarcheal females, amenorrhea, i.e., the absence of at least three consecutive menstrual cycles.
A woman is considered to have amenorrhea if her periods
Page 3 of booklet
24
Further information
• The GP guide then has further information
about Eating Disorders, the Mental Health
Literacy study and the treatment of complex
patients
• A brief assessment tool SCOFF for Eating
disorders follows and this was discussed at the
GP education session
25
The following questions may assist in assessing if a patient has or is at high risk of an ED.
1.Do you think you have an eating disorder?
2. Do you worry about your shape and weight?
3.Have you had any eating binges (eg eating a lot in one go and feeling out of control)
The SCOFF screening tool questions
S- Do you make yourself Sick because you feel uncomfortably full?
C- Do you worry you have lost Control over how much you have eaten\
O- Have you recently lost more than 6.35 KilO grams (One Stone) in a 3 month period?
F- Do you believe yourself to be Fat when others say you are too thin?
F- Would you say Food dominates your life?
One point for every yes; a score of > 2 indicates further questioning is
warranted. (Morgan et al 1999).
A further two questions have been found to have a high sensitivity and specificity to BN (but are not diagnostic).
1.Are you satisfied with your eating patterns? (‘no’)
2. Do you ever eat in secret? (‘yes’)
A ‘no’ for question 1 and a ‘yes’ for question 2 indicates high suspicion for bulimia nervosa and further questioning is
warranted.
Why don’t people seek help?
Research suggests that despite the availability of effective treatments, few people with disordered eating seek treatment. A
study by Mond et al (2004) found in 525 ACT community women, with high levels of ED symptoms, only 19% had ever sought
specific treatment, and among those who did, treatment seeking for weight reduction was far more common than for an ED.
In addition, the mean number of years between their current age and age at first seeking treatment was 10.7 years. Similar
results have been found in women….
Booklet page 7
26
What Treatments Work For Disordered Eating?
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT). Findings from a large number of studies have shown that the most
effective treatment for BN and related conditions is a specific type of psychotherapy, known as CBT, which
aims to modify the dysfunctional attitudes to weight and shape underlying most problems with eating. CBT has
been shown to reduce binge eating and extreme weight-control behaviours, as well as improving symptoms of
depression.
Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), a form of psychotherapy focusing on relationships with other people, has
also been found to be effective, but it takes longer than CBT to work and it may not be appropriate for all
individuals.
Antidepressant Medications are also effective in reducing the frequency of binge eating and weight control
behaviours, while improving mood.
However, the effects are not as great as that obtained with CBT and
available evidence available suggests that they may not be sustained.
Antidepressants are likely to be helpful as a first step in treatment,
particularly where there are symptoms of anxiety or depression.
Combining CBT with antidepressant medication may also be helpful with BN or similar problems.
Generally side effects are minimal with newer antidepressant medications. The best evidence is for fluoxetine,
also known as Prozac or Lovan. Weight gain or loss is unlikely with CBT.
Booklet page 13
27
More GP information
• Various evidence based treatments are
described
• More in depth information about CBT
28
Why Does CBT Work?
A characteristic feature of all eating disorders is the tendency to judge self-worth largely, or even exclusively, in terms of
eating, shape and weight, and their control, rather than evaluating self-worth on the basis of perceived
performance in a variety of domains (e.g. interpersonal relationships, work and parenting). According to the cognitive-
behavioural theory of the maintenance of BN, this over-evaluation of weight and shape is the main factor responsible for
maintaining eating-disordered behaviour. The primary function of CBT is
therefore to change dysfunctional attitudes to weight and shape and this is why CBT is effective in treating a wide range
of eating problems. It is also
important to note that CBT focuses on changing current thoughts and
behaviours, regardless of what events in the past might have led to this state of affairs. This is in contrast to some other
forms of psychotherapy which
focus on causes that stem from the past. Finally, it should be noted that where problems with eating occur in people
who are overweight, implementation of CBT may need to be modified to encourage healthy food choices and/or
increased physical activity.
What happens During CBT?
When administered by a psychotherapist, such as a psychologist or counsellor, CBT generally involves 15-20 one-on-
one treatment sessions, each lasting about one hour, over a 5-month period. However, evidence is accumulating that
the use of a structured self-help treatment manual is also effective when supervised by a GP or other health
professional. In this sort of arrangement, the patient would work through the manual by themselves, but go to the
“therapist” (i.e. the GP or other health professional) every now and then to monitor progress. Regardless of how it is
administered, CBT usually involves three overlapping phases.
Booklet page 14
29
List of when and where to refer in ....
• Community Mental Health
• Child and Youth mental health service
• Community dietitians
• Private psychologists
• Child psychiatrist
• List of “approved” websites for patients
• with contact details and phone numbers
30
GP Clinics resources
• Both GP clinics were given the booklets for their
waiting rooms
• Clinic with GP education first knew that the brochure
was there and were shown it in detail
• Clinic with no GP education were shown the booklet
briefly & made aware the booklet was available
• Both were encouraged to give patients the booklet
31
A guide on
Common Eating
Problems
32
More information for patients
Information for patients follows with the same format as the GP guide:
What are eating disorders?
What treatments are available ?
How do they work?
What treatments don’t work
What happens during CBT
A chapter of a self help book by Peter Cooper was attached with information on how to purchase the book
List of reputable websites (as before)
& A waiting room poster
33
Waiting
room
poster:
34
Attendee Survey
• A written self-report survey was handed to adult women in waiting room
• Which they could fill it out then and return it in box or return it in a replied paid envelope
Results
• GPs appreciated the information
• Over 4 months 155 women completed a health
literacy survey
– 9% Clinical Level Eating Disorders (1 BN)
– 7% subclinical disordered eating
• But
– Most patients were unaware of the poster
– Almost no booklets were taken/given out
Next step: Direct action?
Taking treatment directly to people
who are symptomatic but not in
treatment
Thereby using the tools
available to close the
treatment gap
RCTs of targeted
interventions
First RCT in the community
Aim: To test a health literacy intervention in
community women with disordered eating
(clinical levels of severity) who were not
currently in treatment
• Hay et al.(2007) Early Intervention in
Psychiatry, Vol 1, pp. 316-324.
328 interviewed
185 BN, BED or EDNOS
122 consented to ‘follow-up’ & were
random ized
61 intervent ion 61 cont rol
group
Participants
What each group received
Intervention: Information on eating disorders, in particular on evidenced
based treatments where treatments may be obtained locally.
A detailed description of self-help CBT book.
Feedback on their symptom profiles & prompt to seek treatment
Control group received: Lists and contacts of local specialist treatment facilities and
the (local) Eating Disorders support group & feedback on symptom profile
SF-12 Mental health component scores
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Baseline 6-month 12-month
Intervention
Control
Twelve-m onth follow-up
quality of life:
Other results:
Participation was associated in all with
Increased help-seeking
Improved identification of an eating disorder
Decreased pessimism about eating disorder treatment
But little change in regard for various treatments
Small effect of the intervention on symptoms and function
But we could only partially
replicate the outcomes in
second community based RCT
Hay et al (2011) Targeted prevention in bulimic eating disorders: randomized controlled trials of
a mental health literacy and self-help intervention. In: New Insights into the
Prevention and Treatment of Bulimia Nervosa. InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, pp. 69-84.
The third RCT
Aimed to investigate the impact of enhancing the MHL intervention by
• Adding an evidence-based pure self-help treatment book to the MHL intervention
• Adding eating and weight disorders health literacy (EWD-HL) on nutrition and exercise
• And ensuring people received it in a setting where health professionals were able to offer additional support
Specific aims:
• To test the ease of screening women in general
practice with untreated ED or symptoms and the
acceptance of an unsolicited self-help and EWD-
HL intervention.
• Secondary aims were to inspect symptomatic and
MHL outcomes compared to a non-specific self-
help intervention.
• PSH-CBT book & EWD HL versus PSH-self-esteem
book “Overcoming Low Self-esteem” (Fennell,
1999).
Self-help book of Cooper 1998
• Part 1: Psycho-education
• Part 2: SH CBT
– Monitoring
– Establishing a meal plan
– Learning to intervene
– Problem solving
– Eliminating dieting
– Changing your mind
• Additional information on nutritional & exercise advice for healthy weight management
Participants • 326 women were approached over 6-months in two
general practices.
• 163 were screened of whom 44 (13.5%) women met
criteria and 36 (80%) agreed to do the full
assessments and to have a follow-up assessment.
• Most were in full or part-time employment (57%)
were married or living as married (60%)
• Mean age was 40.1 years (SD 11.9) and mean BMI
was 30 (SD 7.5).
• The majority 40 (90%) were binge eating (7
subjective bingeing only) and 9 (20%) were using
laxatives, diuretics or self-induced vomiting
Results at 3 months
• Limited by low numbers and follow-up 52%
• EWD literacy group more likely to identify the
BED in the vignette
• Little change in perceived helpfulness of
evidence based treatments
• Severity ED Sx reduced across both groups
but no difference between groups
In regards to the value of self-help
books:
• It is likely that these are better provided in the context of a consultation where their role and relevance can be explained.
• Given that in MHL surveys identifying the main problem for the woman with a bulimic ED in the vignette is most often low self-esteem . it was of interest that the self-esteem SH book appeared better received and more found it personally helpful than the ED SH book which some may have perceived as stigmatising
And...
• Although more than half of the respondents reported reading and understanding a significant proportion of the self help material, this appears to have had no impact on curbing attempts to lose weight.
– At assessment, 29 (85%) women reported trying to lose weight in the previous six months whilst in the three month period between assessment and follow up 21 (91%) reported they had been trying to lose weight.
So we decided to return to the
community women in the first
RCT and explore in thematic
analysis their experiences in
help-seeking
In particular:
1. What contributed to a good/bad experience?
2. What were the barriers?
Evans et al (2010)
328 ACT community women interviewed
185 EDs – most EDNOS/BED
122 consented to ‘follow-up’ & were randomized
61 to health literacy intervention 61 to controls
71 (58.2%) completed year 4 follow-up survey
57 completed interviews
Help-seeking
• Most (~75%) for weight loss
• Also for
–Disordered eating and nutrition
–Weight gain
–Other issues related to mental health and
fatigue
• Mostly from GPs, also commercial weight
loss program, dieticians
Stigma
• “She’s a psychiatrist it’s that stigma. Oh god will she
lock me up?”
• “….we lived out in the country ..there just wasn’t
anything like that there. And also one of the other big
things with this was the whole stigma of it. Like my
Mum didn’t even want me to go out of the house in
case somebody saw me and knew what I was
suffering from.”
“The Brush Off”
Don’t ask, don’t tell
• “I don’t think that they really took the eating thing
into consideration as my mental health… I don’t think
they understood that my eating problems were as
important to me”
• “I don’t know whether it was because perhaps I was
still in the healthy weight range … but she didn’t really
diagnose it as a serious issue … I would vomit every
day … and to me that was pretty serious”
Under recognition
• “It’s almost like you have to drop your weight down
to a level where everyone goes, ‘oh my god,
something’s wrong’ before people will help you. You
can’t go in there at normal weight and say I’m having
problems and get help”
• “She measured me and said I’m considered obese so I
just need to lose weight now. But I didn’t tell her
about my eating habits or anything in the past..”
Also in this community study–
despite help seeking and trying to
lose weight we found that: • Weight instability was more common
than weight stability
–and the former was associated with poorer mental health
• There was a noted persistence of eating disorder symptoms and behaviours Hay et al., Nutrients 2013,
Darby et al EWD2009
Poorer self view &
increased
Body image concerns
Disordered eating &
extreme weight control behaviours
Poorer mental health
& quality of life
Fluctuating weight
And mindful that ED MHL studies
consistently find
• Favourable regard for weight losing strategies of EDs
• Fear weight gain with treatment
• Stigma of eating problems e.g., AN comparable to obesity (but not simple)
– Hepworth & Paxton IJED 2007 40:493-504; Zwickert &
Rieger Journal of Eating Disorders 2013 1:5
CBT and weight loss (Hay et al 2009 Cochrane Library)
Direct action 2?
Taking Rχ to the sufferer by integrating
Rχ for eating disorders with programs
for weight management and obesity
Or thus in..
...developing strategies to help people
with EDs understand their problems and
how to effectively seek treatment we
may need to more directly target weight
concern and deliver community
interventions in mental health stigma-
free contexts such as ‘lifestyle’ or ‘well
being’ centres....
With a paradigm shift in
both areas
Promotion of healthy eating and healthy
lifestyles (including activity)
Positive sense of self and societal acceptance
of a range of body types
Would be associated with less disordered
eating and more weight stability & perhaps
even less obesity
Healthy Approach to WeIght and
Food in Eating Disorders
(HAPIFED)
Integrates CBT-E with Weight
management – Adds:
• Psychoeduction about metabolism of weight
loss and ‘set point’
• Appetite regulation – hungry and non-hungry
eating
• Internal control vs external (potions/calories)
• Exercise for health – Loughborugh Eating and
Activity TheraPy LEAP
• Mood regulation skills
The Australian 8/12/99
Women today
Height 164.5 cm
Weight 65.9 kg
BMI 24.4
Women in the 1920s
Height 161.7 cm
Weight 61.5 kg
BMI 23.5
Women’s Eating Health and Lifestyle (WEHL)
studies
• Jonathan Mond UWS • Susan Paxton La Trobe • Frances Quirk JCU • Bryan Rodgers ANU • Cathy Owen ANU
• Carlie de Angelis
– Aberdeen
• Anita Darby, JCU • Carolyn Clark JCU • Jodi Nilsson JCU • Elizabeth Evans UWS • Marta Sawoniewska UWS • Ati Jhajj UWS
Funding:
Private Practice
Fund of The
Canberra Hospital
ACT Health and
Community Care &
ACT Mental Health
Rotary Health
Research Fund
James Cook
University
University of
Western Sydney