workplace savings 3.0

23
Solving America’s Retirement Savings Challenge Robert L. Reynolds President and Chief Executive Officer Putnam Investments

Upload: putnam-investments

Post on 29-Nov-2014

1.814 views

Category:

Economy & Finance


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Strengthening today’s defined contribution plan to meet the retirement income needs of tomorrow

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Workplace Savings 3.0

Solving America’sRetirement SavingsChallenge

Robert L. ReynoldsPresident andChief Executive OfficerPutnam Investments

Page 2: Workplace Savings 3.0

1

What is driving America’sretirement savings challenge?

• We live longer

• While programmed lifetimeincome sources decline

• Responsibility for investmentand lifetime income has shiftedto individuals

Page 3: Workplace Savings 3.0

2

0

5

10

15

20

2005 2015 2025 2035 2045

Medicare

Medicaid

Social Security

Entitlements as percent of GDP

Sources: GAO’s Sept. 2004 baseline extended analysis; Bruce Bartlett, Tax Reform Agenda for the 109th Congress 15 (2004).

Average tax revenueas percent of GDP

Absent reform, entitlements will dominatefederal budgets

18%

Page 4: Workplace Savings 3.0

3

2004 2030

Social Security replacement rates will decline

For earners retiring at age 65. After Medicare Part B deduction (2030 includes higher normal retirement age).Sources: Alicia H. Munnell; 2004. “A Bird’s Eye View of the Social Security Debate;” Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.

Average replacement rate of pre-retirement incomefrom Social Security

38.7%29.4%

Page 5: Workplace Savings 3.0

4

The first generation:Workplace Savings 1.0

• Purely voluntary for sponsorsand participants

• Multiple choices

• Heavily dependent oncommunication and education

• Continuous improvement infeatures and service

1982–2006:401(k) becomes America’splan of choice

Page 6: Workplace Savings 3.0

5

Workplace Savings 1.0While competition kept workplacefund fees down

The industry average expense ratio is a simple average of all mutual funds, and is not asset-weighted.Source: “The Economics of Providing 401(k) Plans: Services, Fees, Expenses, 2007,” ICI Research Fundamentals, December 2008.

Stock funds Bond funds Money market funds

Mutual fund expense ratios

Industry average(asset weighted)

401(k) average(asset weighted)

Industry average0.90

0.670.72

0.60

1.13 1.09

1997 2007

0.51

0.390.47

0.40

0.64 0.62

1997 2007

0.980.86

0.78 0.74

1.54 1.46

1997 2007

Page 7: Workplace Savings 3.0

6

Workplace Savings 1.0As Defined Contribution becameAmerica’s plan of choice

30

43

56

2926 24 22 20

75

19

33 36

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2008

American workers covered(Millions)

DB plansDC plans

Sources: EBRI, ICI, Bernstein Research, Empirical Research Partners, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2008; and American Benefits Council, 2/24/2009.

Page 8: Workplace Savings 3.0

7

6.6

7.1

7.47.5 7.5

1988 1993 1998 2003 2006

Workplace Savings 1.0But hit a ceiling on participationand savings rates

Sources: Standard & Poor’s, DALBAR, Bureau of Labor Statistics, EBRI, National Center for Health Statistics, FMR, 2007, 2008.

Participation rates(% of eligible workers) 69.9

63.1

56.9

64.763.4

1988 1993 1998 2003 2006

Deferral rates(% of salary)

Page 9: Workplace Savings 3.0

8

Workplace Savings 1.0The key lesson: Inertia, defaults, and designdetermine results

Source: sciencemag.org, Vol. 302, November 21, 2003.

Organ donor consent rates 99.98%

12.0%

Germany

Austria

Page 10: Workplace Savings 3.0

9

Workplace Savings 2.0:The PPA “nudge”

2006:The PensionProtection Actoffers a “nudge”

Page 11: Workplace Savings 3.0

10

Workplace Savings 2.0The Pension Protection Act passes in 2006

• Enabled auto enrollment andsavings escalation

• Endorsed defined lifecycle/balanced default options

• Provided legal safe harborfor employers

Page 12: Workplace Savings 3.0

11

Workplace Savings 2.0And PPA drove rapid change

11%

36%

2004 2007

Sources: Investment Company Institute, Center for Retirement Research, Profit Sharing/401k Council of America, 2008.

DC plans adoptingauto enrollment

DC plans offeringtarget date funds

12%

58%2004 2007

Auto-enrolledemployees whostayed in plan

2008

90%

Page 13: Workplace Savings 3.0

12

Workplace Savings 2.0But 2008 brought a once-in-a-lifetime shock

Sources: Putnam, 2008.

1-year stock market declinesgreater than 25%

-43%

-35%

-26%

-37%

1931 1937 1974 2008

Source: S&P 500 Index, 12/31/08.

Page 14: Workplace Savings 3.0

13

Workplace Savings 2.0Many near-term lifecycle funds now appear risky

63.1%59.2% 58.1% 57.0% 55.7% 55.0% 53.8% 53.0%

38.2%

28.0%

A B C D E F G H I

Source: Strategic Insight Simfund, February2009.

Equity allocation for the top 2010 lifecycle funds

Fund families

Industryaverage

47.2%

Putnam

Page 15: Workplace Savings 3.0

14

WorkplaceSavings

Strengthening today’sdefined contribution planto meet the retirement incomeneeds of tomorrow

Page 16: Workplace Savings 3.0

15

Workplace Savings 3.0Next generation plan design

• Build on PPA’s base of auto-enrollment, escalation,and defaults

• Include much stronger protection against volatility

• Built-in options for guaranteed lifetime income

• Provide advice and guidance for all participants

• Full, transparent disclosure of fees, risks, and responsibilities

• Provide legal safe harbor for employers who do theright thing

Page 17: Workplace Savings 3.0

16

Workplace Savings 3.0Consistent returns vs. market volatility

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

$100,000initialinvestment12/31/98

This example of hypothetically consistent returns is for illustrative purposes only. It does not reflect the performance of any Putnam fund, which will fluctuate. The returns above Treasury bills areachieved over consecutive three-year periods starting December 31, 1998, and rolling monthly. Treasury bills are represented by the Merrill Lynch U.S.Treasury Bill Index. Stocks are representedby the S&P 500 Index.You cannot invest directly in an index. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Treasurybills + 5%$163,125

Stocks$87,004

It can take years to recoverfrom a market setback.

It took stock investorsabout 3.5 years to recoverfrom the last bear market.

-38%

-37%

How long will ittake this time?

Page 18: Workplace Savings 3.0

17

Workplace Savings 3.0The growing programmed income “gap”

Today

Workincome

Traditionalpension

SocialSecurity

In 20 years

Investmentincome

Other retirement incomeGuaranteed income

Workincome

Traditionalpension

SocialSecurity

Investmentincome

The“Gap”

Page 19: Workplace Savings 3.0

18

Workplace Savings 3.0Guaranteed income could protect againstcatastrophic losses

30 years of withdrawals from a $1M retirement portfolio$2,378,771 $2,378,771

$640,390$524,889

$238,186

$1,352,090

No guarantee 50% guaranteed

Best-caseincome

Worst-caseincome

Median finalaccount value

Based on 5% annual withdrawals inflated each year by 3%.

Page 20: Workplace Savings 3.0

19

Workplace Savings 3.0We need industry innovationbacked by public policy

WorkplaceWorkplaceSavingsSavings3.03.0

Industryinnovation

Policysupport

Page 21: Workplace Savings 3.0

20

Extend workplace savings to all Americans

75 million Americans haveno workplace retirement plan

Office of Management and Budget, “A New Era of Responsibility:Renewing America’s Promise,” 2009.

Page 22: Workplace Savings 3.0

Solving America’sRetirement SavingsChallenge

Robert L. ReynoldsPresident andChief Executive OfficerPutnam Investments

Page 23: Workplace Savings 3.0

22

The opinions expressed today are those of Robert L. Reynolds, President andChief Executive Officer, Putnam Investments. Mr. Reynolds is affiliated withPutnam Retail Management.

Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges,and expenses of a fund before investing. For a prospectus containing thisand other information for any Putnam fund or product, call your financialrepresentative or call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581. Please read the prospectuscarefully before investing.