working with spirit as a leed™ adaptation - usgbc.org 8-20-01... · the epsten group inc. atlanta...
TRANSCRIPT
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
Working with SPiRiT as a Working with SPiRiT as a LEED™ AdaptationLEED™ Adaptation
USGBC Fourth Annual Member SummitTucson AZ - August 20, 2001
Dagmar Epsten, AIA, CCSLEED™ Accredited Professional
President, THE EPSTEN GROUP, Inc.Atlanta, Georgia
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
Working with SPiRiT as a Working with SPiRiT as a LEED™ Adaptation LEED™ Adaptation
I. IntroductionII. CharrettesIII. LEED™ Adaptability IV. Credit InnovationsV. Process
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
I. IntroductionI. Introduction
Fort Monmouth Project• Renovation in Fort
Monmouth NJ• Future U.S. Military
Academy Preparatory School
• Approx. 160,000 sq.ft., $112.50/sq.ft, $18 Million
• 2 U-Shaped 3-story buildings
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
I. IntroductionI. Introduction
Fort Monmouth Charrette• Charrette on April 11 & 12,
2001• Fort Monmouth, NJ• Charrette Leaders:
Epsten, Jones, Gabler• Charrette Participants:
Corps of Engineers NY, DPW, Design Team, AMXIS
• FIRST USE OF SPiRiT v 1.4
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
I. IntroductionI. Introduction
Fort Monmouth Results• Not Platinum, but Silver• Project Recommendations• Charrette Report :
www.cecer.army.mil/SustDesign/FtMonmouth.pdfSustDesign/FtMonmouth.pdf
• SPiRiT Review: Documentation Suggestions, Charrette Lessons, Process
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
II. CharrettesII. Charrettes
6.C1 Holistic Delivery of FacilityIntent:Encourage a facility delivery process that actively engages all stakeholders in the design process to deliver a facility that meets all functional requirements while effectively optimizing tradeoffs among sustainability, first costs, life cycle costs and mission requirements.
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
II. CharrettesII. Charrettes
6.C1 Holistic Delivery of Facility• (1) Experienced team leaders.• (1) Train entire team.• (1) Identify project goals and metrics.• (1) Plan an execute charrettes.• (2) Identify and resolve tradeoffs among
sustainability, first costs, life cycle costs and mission requirements through charrettes and other collaborative processes.
• (1) Document required results … that achieve the project goals.
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
II. CharrettesII. Charrettes
6.C1 Holistic Delivery of FacilityRequirement – 2 pointsIdentify and resolve tradeoffs among sustainability, first costs, life cycle costsand mission requirements…
• (TEG Doc 1) Summary of life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) according to the Federal Facilities Council Technical Report, Sustainable Federal Facilities: A Guide To Integrating Value Engineering, Life Cycle Costing, and Sustainable Development, FFC # 142, 2000.
• (TEG Lesson 1) Have a draft of a life-cycle cost analysis prepared either by the project team or by the sustainable design experts for the second charrette.
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
III. LEED™ AdaptabilityIII. LEED™ Adaptability
SPiRiT in comparison with LEED™ :SPiRiT: Higher emphasis on
• Facility Delivery Process• Functionality – indoor, conveniences• Adaptability of building for future uses
SPiRiT: Less emphasis on standards/ quantity
• All of the 69 LEED™ credits use standards/ quantity
• Of the additional SPiRiT credits, only 1 does (Distributed Generation)
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
III. LEED™ AdaptabilityIII. LEED™ Adaptability
Higher SPiRiT emphasis makes sense for Fort Monmouth:Facility Delivery Process:
• No submittal to USGBC • Team w/o sustainability
experienceFunctionality – indoor,
conveniences:• High abuse by occupants• Amenities close-by (dining, athletic)
Adaptability of building for future uses:• Building built 1952, renovated 1979, 2002… 2027
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
III. LEED™ AdaptabilityIII. LEED™ Adaptability
Some conditions in Fort Monmouth NOT reflected in SPiRiTArmy base – like a campus– difficult to define boundaries of a site
• LEED™ needs site definition instructions
Force Protection –no bushes or trees
• Habitat landscaping not availableHigh water use - showers Commissioning needed, but “difficult”
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
III. LEED™ AdaptabilityIII. LEED™ Adaptability
Desirable: LEED™ Language Flexibility
• Not “Urban” Redevelopment but “Community Redevelopment”
• Not ASHRAE 90.1 but “or similar standard approved by USGBC” to account for TI 800-01
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
III. LEED™ AdaptabilityIII. LEED™ Adaptability
Perhaps: LEED™ Exceptions for credits generally not available.
• Protect and Restore Open Space N/A due to Force Protection
• HCFC elimination• LEED™ Accreditation not required
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
III. LEED™ AdaptabilityIII. LEED™ Adaptability
Desirable: Extra/ Make-Up LEED™ Innovation Credits.
• 7 SPiRiT v1.4 credits are currently not proposed for LEED 3.0
• LEED 3.0: 10 Innovation Credits?
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
IV. Credit InnovationsIV. Credit Innovations
2 Functional Life of Facility and Supporting Systems 2 Adaptation, Renewal and Future Uses
8. NEW: FUTURE MISSIONS
3 Operation and Maintenance 3 Soldier and Workforce Productivity and Retention
7. NEW: CURRENT MISSION
7 Holistic Delivery of Facility 6. NEW: FACILITY DELIVERY PROCESS
1 Acoustic Environment/Noise Control 1 Facility In-Use Management Plan
5. INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
(no points added)3. MATERIALS ANDRESOURCES
1 Distributed Generation3. ENERGY ANDATMOSPHERE
(no points added) 2. WATER EFFICIENCY
1 Optimize Site Features 2 Minimize Facility Impact 1 Optimize Site Ecology
1. SUSTAINABLE SITES
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
IV. Credit InnovationsIV. Credit InnovationsEnvironmental Sustainability Indicators: Cole/ Larsson GBC 2000
M Pre-Operations ManagementE Economic PerformanceS Quality of ServicesQ IEQD LoadingsIndicatorsR Resource consumptionPerformanceEnergy, Land, Water, GHG EmissionsCore Indicators
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
IV. Credit InnovationsIV. Credit Innovations
Sustainable Sites SPiRiT (see LEED 3.0)
• Optimize Site Features (Solar/ wind & min. cut/fill)
LEED 2.0: • Reduced Site Disturbance
LEED 3.0: • Solar & View Access• Natural & Cultural Systems
Environmental Indicator: • (Energy) Resource Consumption -
Life-cycle energy use
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
IV. Credit InnovationsIV. Credit Innovations
Indoor Environmental QualitySPiRiT(see LEED 3.0)
• Acoustic Environment/ Noise ControlLEED™ 2.0
• No equivalentLEED™ 3.0
• Acoustic ControlEnvironmental Indicator
• IEQ, Noise and acousticsTEG
• Sound insulation, drawings/ specs. Standard, e.g. STC 45, plus NRC .15 for min 50% of areas
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
IV. Credit InnovationsIV. Credit Innovations
Sustainable SitesSPiRiT
• Facility Impact, Cluster Facilities (NEW)LEED™ 2.0 / 3.0
• No equivalentEnvironmental Indicator
• (Land) Resource consumption - Use of land and change in ecological value of land
TEG (Quantity)• Min. 60,000 sq.ft./acre
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
IV. Credit InnovationsIV. Credit Innovations
Sustainable SitesSPiRiT
• Facility Impact, Mitigate Potential Impacts (NEW)
LEED™ 2.0 / 3.0• No equivalent
Environmental Indicator• (GHG Emissions) Pre-
Operations Management -Transportation
TEG• Statement, beyond site
boundary
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
IV. Credit InnovationsIV. Credit Innovations
Sustainable SitesSPiRiTSite Ecology (NEW)
• Ongoing contamination vs. habitatLEED™ 2.0 / 3.0
• No equivalentEnvironmental Indicator
• (GHG Emissions) Loadings -Emission of gases, solid wastes, liquid effluent
TEG • Written management and mitigation plan
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
IV. Credit InnovationsIV. Credit Innovations
New: Current MissionSPiRiT
• High Quality Indoor Environment (NEW)LEED™ 2.0 / 3.0
• No equivalentEnvironmental Indicator
• IEQ, Daylighting, Illumination and visual access
TEG • Meet IES Standard e.g. IESNA Office
Lighting (ANSI Approved), or sample boards of finishes
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
IV. Credit InnovationsIV. Credit Innovations
New: Current MissionSPiRiT
• Highly Functional Work Environment (NEW)
LEED™ 2.0 / 3.0• No equivalent
Environmental Indicator• ???
TEG• Ergonomics
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
IV. Credit InnovationsIV. Credit Innovations
New: Future MissionsSPiRiT
• Adaptation, Future Uses (NEW)LEED™ 2.0 / 3.0
• No equivalentEnvironmental Indicator
• (Energy) Quality of Service –Flexibility and adaptability
TEG (Quantity )• Min. three uses
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
IV. Credit InnovationsIV. Credit Innovations
New: Future MissionsSPiRiT
• Smallest Facility (and design for recycling) (NEW)
LEED™ 2.0 / 3.0• No equivalent
Environmental Indicator• (Land) Resource Consumption
- Net consumption of materialsTEG
• Program w/o contingency, plan for future expansion
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
V. ProcessV. Process
Min. 25 out of 100Min. 26 out of 69
SELF-CERTIFICATIONSubmittal, peer review, certification
Not available unless registeredDocumentation binder/ calculations using TOOLS
Facility Delivery ProcessLEED™ 3.0Design/ Construction Meetings
DeletedLEED™ 2.0 LEED™ Accredited Professional no process requirements
Not available unless registeredQuestions on web
Not requiredRegister on web
SPiRiTLEED™
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
V. ProcessV. Process
Ft. Monmouth SPiRiT points49 out of 100 = 49%“Silver”
Ft. Monmouth LEED points 28 out of 69 = 41%“Certified”
Min. 25 out of 10025+ Bronze35+ Silver50+ Gold75+ Platinum
Min. 26 out of 69 26+ Certified33+ Silver39+ Gold52+ Platinum
SPIRITLEED™
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
V. ProcessV. Process
Typical Corps of Engineers project:• Most: Design/Build• Some: A/E Design + Bid + Build• Few: COE Design + Bid + Build
Currently no quality control for sustainable design except for
• Contractor’s submittals• Typical services
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
V. ProcessV. ProcessService Documentation vs. Performance Data
Maintenance costs
Manufacturers’ data
LandscapingManufacturers’ Data
WATER COSTS
Receipts ArchitecturalDescriptions/ Reports
ELECTRICAL COSTS
Testing results Civil EngineeringSpecifications
HVAC OPERATING COSTS
Photographs MEP SystemsDrawings
PerformanceContractor CommissioningDesign
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
V. ProcessV. ProcessPotential Quality Control for SPiRiT:
Review of operational data
Highest Control
USGBC certification
USGBC certification
High-Highest Control
Review of construction data
Independent review of documentation
Checklist / review/ report in end
High Control
SDD Documentation
SDD Documentation
Continuous SDD review
Medium-High Control
No controlIndependent SDD input
CharrettesMedium Control
“Build to requirement”
“Design to requirement”
Bronze Requirement
Low Control
ConstructionDesign COE
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
V. ProcessV. Process
COE/ Military Bases to consider:
• Extended warranty period/ retainage/ service contracts/ commissioning: 3 – 12 months
• Request user training• Verify operational data
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
V. ProcessV. ProcessTo go to SPiRiT Bronze Level – min. 25 points:
28 points > 25 points min. 12 points
Roof surfaces: 1 pt.Roof surfaces: 1 pt.
Water reduction: 1 pt.Water reduction: 1 pt.Facility Delivery: 6 pts out of 7 ptsNo process points
Optimize Energy: 20 pts50% New or Existing over TI 800-01
Optimize Energy: max. 10 pts60% New, 50% Existing over ASHRAE 90.1
Prerequisites, including • Fundamental Commissioning,• Minimum Energy using TI 800-01
instead of ASHRAE 90.1
PrerequisitesSPIRIT – TEG RecommendationsLEED™ 2.0
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
More InformationMore Information
http://www.cecer.army.mil/ sustdesign/
http://www.hqda.army.mil/ acsimweb/fd/linksSDD.htm
http://www.buildingsgroup.nrcan.gc.ca/ Projects_e/GBTool.htmlSupport Manual, Office Buildings (Environmental Indicators)
THEEPSTENGROUPInc.ATLANTAGA
Discussion: SPiRiTDiscussion: SPiRiT
• Should LEED™ be adapted? Or not, but be more flexible?
• Need for more new credits?• Standards/ quantities for all?• Process? • Control: Documentation/ Data?