working group recommendations - portrait of columbus
TRANSCRIPT
2Back to TOC
AgendaWelcome and OverviewArnie Good & Gordon HeckerYouth ages 14-21Or Mars, Jenni Goldson & Gary RosensteinYoung Adults 22+Erin Essak-Kopp, Ruthie WarshenbrotDayna Chessin & Michael Schottenstein
Baby Boomers & Seniors
David Kaplan & Amy ShevrinLow Income HouseholdsBen Berger, Steve Allen & Eugenia ErlijHomes with Children (0-13)Jay Moses, Jenny Glick & Rachel Weiss– BergerFinal ThoughtsArnie Good & Gordon Hecker
Portrait of Jewish Columbus
Back to TOC
The TaskEach working group is charged with answering the following questions:
What are the one or two programs or services that…1. …best promote engagement with the Jewish community?2. …could benefit the most from a community-wide effort to
increase their excellence, affordability and/or capacity?
3
Portrait of Jewish Columbus
5Back to TOC
Working Group Members
• Jenni Goldson Co-Chair• Gary Rosenstein Co-Chair• Or Mars Consultant• Elana Polster Staff• Jennie Cammeyer• Micah Goldfarb• Gary Kuhr• Miriam Portman• Brad Rozen• Beth Silverstein
6Back to TOC
Recommendation: Columbus Jewish Teen Initiative
The creation of a well-funded, expertly staffed Columbus Jewish Teen Initiative, a coordinated and comprehensive program, that will invest in relationship-building, leadership development and teen engagement.
7Back to TOC
Key Findings
• Portrait study
• Programs currently offered in Columbus
• Scan of Jewish Columbus
• Successful programs in other communities
8Back to TOC
Portrait Study Findings
• 1,550 households have a child 14-17
• 73% of households with children 14-17 are in Downtown/University or Bexley
• 86% of families in Bexley area state that being Jewish is very important in their lives
• 28-44% of families living in the perimeter areas claim that being Jewish is very important in their lives
• 1 in 3 children overall are being raised as "Jewish only"
9Back to TOC
Programs Currently Offered in Columbus
• BBYO and Movement Youth Groups • Birthright Israel• B’nai Tzedek Teen Philanthropy• Friendship Circle• High School and Middle School Jewish Outreach• Jewish Community Center (BBYO, JET, CIT program)• Summer Camps (Wise, Livingston, EKC, Ramah, Guci)• OSU Hillel• P2G Teen Trip to Israel• Wexner Service Corps
10Back to TOC
• Strategy and resources for engaging teens that are not connected to any of these programs (with a specific emphasis on teens who live in the geographic periphery of the Jewish community)
• Strategy and resources for coordinating programs with one another for more significant effectiveness and efficiency through collaboration
• Scholarships, grants, or alternative funding to help families afford youth group conferences, summer camps and Israel trips
• Educational planning for deepening the Jewish content of programs
• Additional personnel for individual relationship building with teens 14-18
• A database of all Columbus Jewish teens to insure increased engagement and to measure success.
Scan of Jewish Columbus – Key Needs
11Back to TOC
Successful Programs in Other Communities
• North Shore Teen Initiative (Boston)• Jewish Teen Initiative (Denver)• Teen Israel Trips Initiative (Cincinnati)
12Back to TOC
Recommendation: Columbus Jewish Teen Initiative
The creation of a well-funded, expertly staffed Columbus Jewish Teen Initiative, a coordinated and comprehensive program, that will invest in relationship-building, leadership development and teen engagement by:
13Back to TOC
Focus:• 14-18 year olds• Build, enhance, and strengthen connection
between existing programs vs. creation of new programs
• Informal educational experiences
Recommendation: Columbus Jewish Teen Initiative
14Back to TOC
Recommendation: Columbus Jewish Teen Initiative
• Hiring a nationally recognized full-time director supported by an empowered advisory board
• Focusing on one-on-one relationship building by primarily going to the teens instead of trying to bring them to our institutions
• Incorporating appropriate levels of Jewish educational content for teen programs
15Back to TOC
Recommendation: Columbus Jewish Teen Initiative
Increasing teen leadership development to: • Empower and train teens to provide strong
leadership to their own programs and organizations
• Think strategically about communal collaboration (perhaps through a city-wide teen council)
16Back to TOC
Recommendation: Columbus Jewish Teen Initiative
Providing a significant minimum budget for:• Budget
– High quality Full Time Director– Internship/Ambassadors program– Database construction– Teen Leadership Development– Professional Development for Youth Group Directors– Collaboration Grants– Community-Wide Programs
– Administrative Costs $270,000• Scholarships for Immersion Programs $500,000
– Israel Trips– Summer Camps– Youth Group Conferences– Service Learning Trips
17Back to TOC
Measuring Success
• The number of teens participating in organized programs (based on data organized through this initiative)
• Overall teen engagement as measured by frequency and depth of engagement.
• Increased support for teen program staffing and engagement of funding partners
18Back to TOC
In short we recommend a paradigm shift: • Institution-based programming to relationship-based engagement• Deeper investment in our current teen opportunities • Teen leadership empowerment• Coordination and collaboration across institutional and denominational
lines
A well-funded, coordinated effort, with an expert professional staff and an active advisory board will insure that our teens will be active and contributing participants in the Jewish community and live enriched, satisfying, connected and inspired Jewish lives.
Final Thoughts
Portrait of Jewish ColumbusYoung Adults 22+ Working Group
Engaging People Where They Live, Work, and Play:
A Downtown Hub and Targeted Programming
November 3, 201419
20Back to TOC
Working Group Members
• Dayna Chessin Co-Chair• Michael Schottenstein Co-Chair• Erin Essak Kopp Staff• Ruthie Warshenbrot Staff
Members: – Matthew Goldstein– Brett Kaufman– Sara Kreinberg– Sara Scheinbach
– Lauren Sobol– Jonathan Stone– Ryan Vesler
21Back to TOC
Executive Summary
What do we want to achieve? - Continue to grow the Jewish young professional community by
providing reasons to stay, flourish and give back
Strategy- Build a stronger connection with new programmatic initiatives and a
downtown space that becomes part of their everyday lives
Measuring Success- 5 year goal = engage 30% of Jewish young professionals annually - 10 year goal = engage 60% of Jewish young professionals annually
22Back to TOC
Programs Currently Offered in Columbus
• ATID• Moishe House• High Street Synagogue (Torat Emet)• OSU Hillel / Graduates and Young
Professionals (GAP)• J-Connect at the Kollel
23Back to TOC
Successful Programs in Other Communities
• The Kavana Cooperative (Seattle) ‒ “Hillel for Adults”
• The Kitchen (San Francisco) ‒ “Religious startup”
• NextGen (Detroit) ‒ Model for young adult programming‒ 15 full time staff
• Sixth & I (Washington D.C.) ‒ Cultural hub
24Back to TOC
Focus Group Key Facts
• Jewish 22-44 yr olds are looking for:– Professional development
and networking opportunities– Substantive, content-driven
programming– A sense of belonging…
Back to TOC
Findings from the Portrait Study• Approximately 3,550
Jewish young professionals
• 72% of young Jewish households are located in the Downtown / University District Area
• 53% of those living downtown said “Jewish events are too far”
• 5% are JCC members25
26Back to TOC
Recommendation• Leverage the strength of the Columbus brand– Young, intelligent, innovative, entrepreneurial, increasingly
urban and thriving economically
• Columbus needs a new brand of outreach and engagement that reaches young professionals in their everyday lives– Downtown Hub– Targeted Programming
27Back to TOC
• Current programming needs to evolve to reach the thousands of people who aren’t currently engaged
• A downtown hub would provide an everyday destination for Jewish young professionals
Why a Downtown Hub?
28Back to TOC
Downtown Hub
•A “daily use space” and downtown meeting spot for young professionals•Goal is to create engagement and connection around the things that people like and care to do every day
The Place To Be
Engage and Connect
Potential Services & Amenities
• Ambassador program for community outreach
• Professional development
• Spiritual Programming
• Philanthropic Events
• Coffee shop• Activity Space
⁻ Gym⁻ Basketball courts⁻ Yoga studio
• Restaurant / Bar• Programming space• Event space• Offices for staff of
Downtown Hub and Atid
30Back to TOC
Ambassador Program • Centered around one-on-one relationships • Reach people in their day-to-day lives and
connect them to the broader Jewish community– At work, in affinity groups and in neighborhoods
Manager (Staff)Retail/Finance
Ambassador(Volunteer)
Ambassador(Volunteer)
Ambassador(Volunteer)
Manager (Staff)LGBT/Interfaith
Ambassador(Volunteer)
Ambassador(Volunteer)
Ambassador(Volunteer)
31Back to TOC
Estimated Costs and Revenue Sources
• Programmatic = $155,000/year
• Downtown Hub = TBD– Potential Revenue Sources• Gym memberships (est.$40+ per month/person)• Fitness Classes• Restaurant/Coffee Shop/Bar• Sponsorships• Event space
32Back to TOC
• Meet people’s needs where they live, work and play– Provide them with the programs they want – In the location they are– Integrated into their everyday lives
Conclusion
34Back to TOC
Working Group Members
• Amy Shevrin Co-Chair• Ray Silverstein Co-Chair• David Kaplan Staff• Arlene Weiss• Dick Sabgir• Jessica Shimberg• Julie Weinerman• Keila Naparstek• Kirk Hilbrands• Randy Arndt
35Back to TOC
Overview
- Key findings- What works in other communities- Recommendations- Final thoughts
36Back to TOC
Key Findings from the Portrait Study
• Over 50% of all Jewish households are Baby Boomers and Seniors– Largest demographic group– Baby Boomers (45-64) are evenly spread out– Seniors (65+) are concentrated in the East
38Back to TOC
Programs Offered in Columbus
• Jewish engagement opportunities for Baby Boomers & Seniors are numerous– Synagogue programming and religious life– Programs in Jewish organizations– Board and volunteer opportunities
39Back to TOC
Working Group Insights
• Barriers to engagement:–Not aware of current engagement opportunities–Not feeling welcome or comfortable
participating–No personal connection
• Jewish Values– Tikkun Olam–Open tent
40Back to TOC
Key Findings from Other Studies
• 70% started volunteering when asked by someone who had a strong relationship with them (Harvard Public Health study, 2012)
• Baby Boomer volunteering is expected to grow by 50% during the current decade (U.S. Census, 2010)
• Individuals volunteer most frequently for organizations with religious affiliation (Bureau of Labor Statistics)
41Back to TOC
How Other Communities Successfully Engage
• Baltimore, Jewish Volunteer Connection- Create “Volun-teams” through a centralized office
• Portland, Tivnu - Builds homes (habitat for humanity), with Jewish learning and leadership development components
• Israel, Eschel Project- Seniors are trained to turn hobbies into micro-businesses
42Back to TOC
Recommendation #1: J-Link Columbus• What:
– Connect community members to Jewish engagement opportunities– Consists of existing programming and volunteering– Combination of outreach professionals and centralized data– Initiative housed in Federation
• How: – 4 outreach professionals with geographic responsibilities– Connecting one-on-one with community members– Guiding individuals to best serve their interests
• Measurements:– Participation, both hours & dollars
• Costs: – $300,000 - $400,000 per year
43Back to TOC
Recommendation #2: Columbus Service Corp
• What: – Volunteer groups comprised of Baby Boomers and Seniors– Service, social, learning, and leadership elements– Inspired by Wexner Service Corp
• How: – Professional staff develop curriculum and volunteer opportunities– Connect service corp members to leadership positions
• Measurements:– Participation, both hours & dollars
• Costs: – $100,000 - $150,000 per year– Personnel, curriculum development, operating costs
44
Portrait of Jewish Columbus
Low Income Jewish Households Working Group
RecommendationsNovember 3, 2014
45Back to TOC
Working Group
Dr. Steven Allen Co-Chair, Nationwide Children’s Eugenia Erlij Co-Chair, SolenisRabbi Benjamin Berger Consultant, The Wexner FoundationElana Polster Staff, The Columbus Jewish FederationDan Finkelman ConsultantBobbie Garber Columbus Metropolitan Housing AuthorityAlisa Isaac Community VolunteerAmy Klaben HomeportLaurie Stein Marsh Leadership ColumbusJennifer Marshall Formerly JFS, GoodwillMargie Pizzuti Goodwill
The working group met on five occasions between May and October.
46Back to TOC
Primary Efforts
• Reviewed JPAR results and reassessed low income figures• Interviewed local synagogues, day schools and agencies• Reviewed report on poverty and programs offered by social service
agencies in Columbus
47Back to TOC
Key Findings from the Portrait Study
JEWISH POVERTY IS A REAL ISSUE
• Number of Jews in poverty* is difficult to ascertain− Best estimate of Jewish poverty rate in Columbus is ~16%, but data
is lacking
• 14% of respondents from households in poverty stated that being Jewish is “very important” to their life
• 1 in 5 households report costs prevent affiliation
* Poor = annual income <150% Federal Poverty Level (FPL)− Up to $35,325 for a family of 4
48Back to TOC
Working Group Findings
JEWISH POVERTY IN COLUMBUS NOT WELL UNDERSTOOD
• Minimal cross communication and collaboration amongst agencies• Leaders have difficulty identifying needs though high cost of affiliation
and living are clear challenges• Shame and stigma are barriers to self-identification and affiliation • Impoverished Jews are much more likely to be disaffiliated• Columbus is not alone
49Back to TOC
Working Group Findings
• 240 survivors of Nazi persecution (100+ on Medicaid)• 30-64 year-olds
including “working poor”
Respondent Age from Poor Jew-ish Households
AT RISK SEGMENTS OF THE POPULATION
50Back to TOC
Working Group Findings
EXISTING SERVICES IN COLUMBUS JEWISH COMMUNITY
• JFS and WHV are the primary service providers in the Jewish community ( Lack of data on what other community services families are utilizing.)
• All organizations including synagogues have touch points with poverty
• Discretionary funds distributed for incidental and Jewish life needs throughout organizations
• Scrip gift certificates are main sources of monetary support ($119k distributed since 2005)
Back to TOC
Recommendation #1
DEVELOP A COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION AND OUTREACH EFFORT
51
• Equip Jewish professionals (rabbis, synagogue and school administrators, agency leaders) with tools to respond and support Jews experiencing poverty
• Support community in identifying households in poverty in order to provide services more effectively
• Help reduce the emotional toll of poverty• Increase community awareness of Jewish poverty • Reduce misinformation and common dismissiveness• Reduce shame and stigma associated with poverty
Back to TOC
• Number of participants in training
• Number of synagogues participating in Shabbat on poverty
• Number of public events where “poverty” is on the agenda
• Number of Jews accessing services provided by Jewish community and broader Columbus social services
52
Recommendation #1Awareness, Outreach, and Education Campaign
KEY ACTIVITIES• Provide training for rabbis and
other professionals on the range of community services
• Coordinate annual Shabbat on poverty
• Create community summit on Jewish poverty
• Develop “speakers bureau” – first hand accounts to be shared in public events
• Provide educational materials at public points
SUCCESS MEASURES
53Back to TOC
Recommendation #2
INCREASE ACCESS TO RESOURCES PROVIDED BY JEWISH COMMUNITY
• Decrease barriers to inclusion• Serve as liaison to help negotiate reduced fees and additional support
from Jewish organizations• Increase knowledge of and access to current support services • Rapid response to emergency situations (e.g. Bonei Mishpochot,
increased visibility)• Reduce burden of organizations & synagogues to support financial needs
of constituents
54Back to TOC
Recommendation #2 Inclusion Gateway
SUCCESS MEASURES• Annual $ in fund• Annual $ distributed to households
in need• Number of households
coordinated across agencies/synagogues
• Affiliation statistics amongst low income Jewish population in future surveys
• Database about low income population
KEY ACTIVITIES• Provide single contact for those
seeking help to cover expenses related to Jewish living
• Create fund that can be used to supplement cost of Jewish living
• Create fund that can respond to emergency need in response to catastrophic event
• Provide access/referral to further community-based job support and counseling services
55Back to TOC
Recommendation #3
SUPPORT CREATION OF SURVIVORS OF NAZI PERSECUTION FUND
• Close gap between needs and government funding− Reduction in Federal Food Assistance Program and Public
Medicaid funds (PASSPORT)• Address unique aging needs
− Importance of in-home care vs. institutional settings− High percentage of Russian speakers− Need for specialized training for caregivers (e.g. short-term
memory loss leaves individual with memory of trauma)
56Back to TOC
Recommendation #3Survivors of Nazi Persecution Fund
SUCCESS MEASURES• $ raised in fund• Number of survivors helped
KEY ACTIVITIES• Leverage the match and generosity
of Wexner Family matching gift• Increase profile of fund• Publicize the existing reality • Develop case studies/profiles for
publication
57Back to TOC
Recommendation #1 OUTREACH & EDUCATION
Summary
Recommendation #3 SURVIVOR FUND
Recommendation #2 INCLUSION GATEWAY
• Identify existing leader (s) to champion message (e.g.JCC, WHV, JFS)
• Professional with background in education, counseling/social work and poverty
• ~$20 -50k annual programming costs
• Strengthen existing programs • Can be considered in combination with
recommendation #1• ~$250K (PTE and/or FTE, programming, fund
development)
• $1.5 MM for fund
58
Portrait of Jewish Columbus
Homes with Children 0-13 Working Group Recommendations
November 3, 2014
59Back to TOC
Working Group Members
Rachel Weiss-BergerCo-chair
Jenny GlickCo-chair
Rabbi Jay MosesStaff
Elana PolsterStaff
Lara Blumberg Ilissa Eiferman Matthew Freedman Sara Saldoff
Jeremy Cohen (resigned – illness)
60Back to TOC
Meetings and Activities
The working group met six times between April and October.
The group completed the following key tasks:
• Review of data• Conducted local research• Conducted national research• Brainstormed, developed, and refined recommendations in
this report.
61
Prepared by KJ Steinman, based on analyses provided by JPAR. Please contact authors for technical details. 61
Three Key Findings from POJC
50%Percentage of children living
In Jewish households
with NO Jewish education
Jewish households with children are evenly
distributed across the 4 areas of residence in
Columbus
30%Percentage of
children in Jewish
household attending overnight
camp
62Back to TOC
Why Experiential Education?
21%As adults,
campers are more likely to feel that being Jewish is
very important. (Cohen et al, 2011)
Attending Jewish overnight camp leads to practicing
Judaism as adults.(Pew, 2013)
64Back to TOC
Recommendation: JCamp Columbus
Concept:
JCamp Columbus will increase the impact of the “magic” of Jewish overnight summer camping
• Summer camp spirit year round!• More Campers• Affordability
65Back to TOC
Recommendation: JCamp Columbus
Examples of JCamp Columbus in action:• Events bringing the spirit of camp into the
community.• Collaboration: join forces to spread the message of
the importance of camp.• Re-imagined camp fair• In-home gatherings of camp families: educational,
social, and fun• Scholarships and incentive coupons
66Back to TOC
Collectively, these camps served approximately 200 children in 2014.
6 Overnight Camps Serve ColumbusGUCI Ramah Stone
Livingston WiseEmma Kaufmann
67Back to TOC
Successful National Programs
• Foundation for Jewish Camp: One Happy Camper, Bunk Connect
• Harold Grinspoon Foundation: JCamp 180• Pearlstone Retreat Center, Baltimore
68Back to TOC
Recommendation: JCamp Columbus
Range of Costs:
$55k staff resources (part-time) and programming budget for local programs$250k incentive/scholarships
69Back to TOC
Recommendation: JCamp Columbus
Measuring Success:• Increase in number of children who attend
Jewish summer camps – Double within 5-7 years
• Improved collaborative relationships between camps, synagogues, and agencies.
• Palpable increase in the “camp spirit” in Columbus Jewish life: warmth, singing, creativity, experiential learning.
70Back to TOC
The NeedTo engage the multi-generational family – not just childrenCreate a local “crown jewel” of Columbus
71Back to TOC
Recommendation: Hoover Family Center
Concept:For many years, the Columbus JCC has used Camp Hoover as a day camp facility for local fourth through eighth graders. The facility is well-utilized now, but there is the potential for it to be so much more. Fast forward three to five years. Imagine the Hoover Family Center—the result of strong collaboration, planning and fundraising between The Wexner Foundation, the Jewish Federation of Columbus, and the Columbus JCC. The Hoover Family Center is a centrally located pluralistic retreat that will engage Jewish families across Columbus by offering meaningful family-oriented programming with minimal barriers to participation. The community facility will allow Jews to connect with one another while also fostering new opportunities for experiential Judaism.
72Back to TOC
Recommendation: Hoover Family Center
Concept:The immediate focus for programming will be on a multi-generational family camp that will serve as an opportunity for children to experience Jewish overnight camp at a younger age. Experiential Judaism at the Hoover Family Center is not limited to the summer months. The center’s Kosher kitchen will adjoin a conference center and social hall to allow for year-round retreats and gatherings. The center will be open to all local Jewish agencies and will serve as a destination for national Jewish scholars. While the primary mission of the Hoover Family Center is to engage local Jewish families with young children, the one-of-a-kind multi-purpose facility will be home to a multitude of programming.
73Back to TOC
Hoover Family Center:Possible Programs
Family camp programs including Bubbie Zaydie weekend retreats.
Expanded JCC day camp offerings
Experiential learning opportunities for young adults,
families, synagogues and organizations
Revenue from corporate or broader community groups beyond Jewish community
Back to TOC
Hoover Family Center:Possible Programs
Life cycle events Environmental, farming, and
outdoor programming
Regional hub
75Back to TOC
Recommendation: Hoover Family Center
Rationale / “The Why?”:• This process requested bold and visionary thinking.
This is a “big idea” worthy of the charge we were given.
• Underutilized property• Centrally located – serving all of Columbus• There is no Jewish retreat center in Ohio.• Easy entry point to Jewish overnight camp.• Create a shared collaborative space• Bringing the spirit of Jewish summer camping to all
ages at all seasons of the year.
76Back to TOC
Recommendation: Hoover Family Camp
Range of Costs:• Feasibility study required• Major capital improvements and facility
enhancements would be necessary
77Back to TOC
Recommendation: Hoover Family Center
Measuring Success:• Use current POJC study as a benchmark• Track alumni of the different programs at the Hoover
Family Center. Where/how do they engage? Youth groups, overnight camps, day schools, Synagogues, etc.
• Have Jewish relationships formed that might not have otherwise existed?
• Is there an increase in1. Regional organizations that utilize the facility?2. Amount of annual revenue—year over year?3. Quantity and quality of programs hosted by agencies?4. Quantity of private events?